跳到主要内容
Nelum
马来西亚的法律

Malaysia Plastics Sustainability Roadmap 2021 - 2030

颁布于 2021 · 文本截至 2026-10-01

以研究形式发布的公开法律与官方指引,不构成法律、税务或金融建议。

研究内容本身以英文撰写。标题和标签已翻译,调查结果和引文未翻译。

关于这部法律

语言
English
类型
policy
国家
马来西亚
主题
Environment, Waste and hazardous substances
关键词
pollution control, business/industry/corporations, capacity building, circular economy, ecofriendly products/ecofriendly processes, education, environmental planning, fiscal and market measures, good practices, hazardous waste, hazards, innovation, packaging/labelling, monitoring, plastic, processing/handling, protection of environment, recycling/reuse, sustainable development, sustainable use, waste disposal, waste domestic sources, waste management, waste non-domestic sources, waste prevention, policy/planning
类别
*

在哪里阅读

    该法律没有记录来源链接。

文本

所收录的法律原文,按条款排列。每个条款都有自己的链接。

  1. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes with written permission from the Ministry of Environment & Water (KASA). Published in 2021 by MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & WATER (KASA), MALAYSIA Block F11, Complex F Federal Government Administrative Centre 62000 Putrajaya MALAYSIA www.kasa.gov.my 1. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) 2. Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) 3. Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia (UIAM) 4. Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) 1. Association of Malaysian Express Carriers (AMEC) 2. Gabungan Persatuan-Persatuan Penjaja dan Peniaga Kecil Melayu Malaysia (GPPPKMM) 3. Malaysia Plastics Recyclers Association (MPRA) 4. Malaysia Retailers Association (MRA) 5. Malaysian Petrochemicals Association (MPA) 6. Malaysian Plastics Manufacturers Association (MPMA) 7. Malaysian Recycling Alliance Berhad (MAREA) 8. Small and Medium Enterprise Association (SAMENTA) 1. Bank Pembangunan Malaysia Berhad 2. CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd 3. Hong Leong Bank Berhad 4. HSBC Amanah Malaysia Berhad 5. HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad 6. United Overseas Bank Limited Acknowledgement Government Sector This Malaysia Plastics Sustainability Roadmap was developed through the active and dedicated participation of various stakeholders, representing federal and state governments, international organisations, academia, associations, industry players, financial institutions, and non-governmental organisations. All the valuable inputs were discussed, analysed and consolidated to shape this document. The Ministry of Environment and Water would like to express our highest appreciation to the World Bank Group for supporting the background studies prior to the formulation of this Roadmap. Our sincerest appreciation also goes to Malaysia Green Technology and Climate Change Centre (MGTC) and WWF-Malaysia for the facilitation rendered during the stakeholder engagements and drafting processes. We are very grateful for the contributions, inputs and insight from the organisations below: Economic Planning Unit (EPU) Ministry of Entrepreneur Development and Cooperatives (MEDAC) Ministry of Federal Territories (KWP) Ministry of Finance (MOF) Ministry of Health (MOH) Ministry of Housing and Local Government (KPKT) Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) Ministry of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs (KPDNHEP) Department of Environment (DOE) Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (JAKIM) Department of National Solid Waste Management (JPSPN) Department of Standards Malaysia (Standards Malaysia) Malaysian Bioeconomy Development Corporation Sdn. Bhd. (BioEconomy) Malaysia Green Technology and Climate Change Centre (MGTC) Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA) Malaysia Productivity Corporation (MPC) SIRIM Berhad SIRIM QAS International Sdn. Bhd. SME Corporation Malaysia (SMECorp) Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Management Corporation (SWCORP) Economic Planning Division, Kedah Economic Planning Division, Perlis Economic Planning Unit, Kelantan Economic Planning Unit, Negeri Sembilan Economic Planning Unit, Sarawak Economic Planning Unit, Selangor Kedah State Secretary Office Johor State Secretary Office Ministry of Local Government and Housing Sarawak Penang Green Council Terengganu State Secretary Office International Organisations The World Bank Group United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Waste and Resource Action Programme (WRAP) 1. 2. 3. Academia Associations Financial Institutions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 2021-2030 i Non-Governmental Organisations Alam Flora Sdn Bhd BASF Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Binsen Plastic Industry Sdn. Bhd. Canter Industries Sdn. Bhd. Chong Wah Plastics Sdn. Bhd. Coca-Cola Bottlers Malaysia Centre for Research, Advisory and Technology (CREATE) Diyou Fibre (M) Sdn. Bhd. Dutch Lady Milk Industries Berhad Erianas Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. E-idaman Sdn. Bhd. E-Interglobal WM Sdn. Bhd. Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd. Green Resource Recovery Sdn. Bhd. Guardian Health and Beauty Sdn. Bhd. Hatta Dolmat Design Heng Hiap Industries Sdn. Bhd. Isetan of Japan Sdn. Bhd. KDEB Waste Management Sdn. Bhd. KLEAN Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Lasaju Consulting Sdn Bhd Lean Lee Trading Co. Sdn. Bhd. Logomas Packaging Sdn. Bhd. Lotte Chemical Titan Holding Sdn. Bhd. Lotuss Stores (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Lulu Group Retail Sdn. Bhd. Malakoff Corporation Berhad Malaysia Airlines Berhad Megafoam Containers Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. Meranti Global Waste Management Miracle Spectrum Sdn. Bhd. Nestle Products Sdn. Bhd. NUDE the Zero Waste Store Pembersihan MYMY Sdn. Bhd. Perkhidmatan Pembersihan Ikhlas Sdn. Bhd. Petronas Chemical Group Berhad Petronas Dagangan Berhad Q-Wizard Solutions Sdn. Bhd. Recron (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. ResourceCo Asia (M) Sdn. Bhd. RS Polymer Sdn. Bhd. Scientex Packaging Film Sdn. Bhd. See Hau Global Sdn Bhd Sha Sejahtera Ent. She Academy & Consultancy (M) Sdn Bhd Sipro Plastic Industries Sdn. Bhd. SOGO (KL) Department Store Sunanjaya Sdn. Bhd. TetraPak Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. The Food Purveyor Sdn. Bhd. Thong Guan Plastic & Paper Industries Sdn. Bhd. Topflight Plastics Sdn. Bhd. Tycoplas Sdn. Bhd. Wahbo (M) Sdn. Bhd. Watson’s Personal Care Stores Sdn. Bhd. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Amanah Lestari Alam Blue Hope Fuze Ecoteer Outdoor Adventures Sdn Bhd Glimpse of Malaysia Impactlution / Generasi Peduli Sampah RCOMM Lestari Reef Check Malaysia Sampah, Menyampah! WWF Malaysia Yayasan Tzu Chi Zero Waste Malaysia Private Sector 2021-2030 ii We need to shift to a sustainable and circular plastics economy, where we produce and use plastics consciously, and at the same time, tap the economic value from this plastic waste. YB Dato’ Sri Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man Minister of Environment and Water 2021-2030 1 Foreword COVID-19 virus has already rocked the world in terms of health, safety, economy and social wellbeing in every country. This has challenged us to build resilience as we wade through this pandemic, and the road ahead has to be on a green recovery pathway. We need to keep the balance and embrace the planetary health approach to understand that going green is also development. The increase in plastic consumption during a pandemic era increases the burden of waste management system and the environmental risk, particularly from plastic and marine pollution. We need to shift to a sustainable and circular plastics economy, where we produce and use plastics consciously, and at the same time, tap the economic value from this plastic waste. In moving forward, Circular Economy is the best practicable model of production and consumption, reducing pressure on the environment, improving the circularity of the supply of raw materials, stimulating innovation, extending product life-cycle, and boosting economic growth while closing the loop. Malaysia Plastics Sustainability Roadmap, 2021-2030 outlines strategies and action plans to achieve greater plastic circularity levels in Malaysia. We hope that this roadmap will be the guidance policy to all stakeholders in ensuring plastic sustainability along the value chain guided by the concept of circularity and be part of the solution towards a sustainable environment. Damage has appeared in land and sea because of the doing of the people’s hands, that He may make them taste something of what they have done, so that they may come back (QS. Ar-Rum: 41) 2021-2030 2 Sustainable consumption and production patterns are important to reduce the usage of natural resources and environmental degradation, which leads to planetary health. YBhg. Dato’ Seri Ir. Dr. Zaini Ujang Secretary General Ministry of Environment and Water 2021-2030 3 Preface With today's expanding global population, limited capital, resources, and unprecedented climate change impacts, one thing is certain: the existing economic's linear model will not support sustainable living. New approaches, such as green, environmentally friendly, or circular economy models are evolving, but not yet at scale. Malaysia has always promoted sustainable development by balancing economic growth and environmental protection, in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs). Sustainable consumption and production patterns are important to reduce the usage of natural resources and environmental degradation, which leads to planetary health. Align with the sustainable development agenda, Malaysia is moving towards plastic circularity to close the waste loop and protect the environment. We will build on the findings of current studies and provide ongoing support and guidance to key players within the plastic value chain to adopt circularity. Shifting from a linear to a circular economy for plastics is crucial to decoupling Malaysia's growth from environmental degradation and will help ensure a more sustainable way of life for future generations. In preserving and sustaining the environment while generating the economy, we need a mutual understanding of shifting towards competitive global supply chains to encourage more multinational and smaller and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) to build sustainable and inclusive business models. These development approaches cannot just be about what governments spend, but it must harness the unprecedented resources of our interconnected world. Adhering to the SDG's objectives to ultimately achieve the goals, the government would have to measure, monitor progress and manage the efficacy of the policy and interventions along its course. As a result, companies will need to analyse their business strategy's effect on the SDGs and change accordingly. This approach will need data, and information to be collected, verified and reported. 2021-2030 This Malaysia Plastics Sustainability Roadmap is crafted to help inform all stakeholders about the opportunities and necessary measures we must take to unlock the potential value of the plastics industry and subsequently achieve plastics circularity while also supporting the government and global agenda towards a healthier, cleaner and sustainable Malaysia. 4 Table Of Contents ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GLOSSARY & WORKING DEFINITION CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview of global and Malaysia plastics landscape 1.1.1 The global plastics industry 1.1.2 The global plastics challenges 1.1.3 Malaysia plastics landscape 1.2 Challenges to plastics circularity and sustainability in Malaysia CHAPTER 2 - MALAYSIA PLASTICS SUSTAINABILITY ROADMAP 2.1 Objective 2.2 Scope 2.3 Strategies 2.3.1 Improving product design, collection and sorting outcomes 2.3.2 Market development and innovation to grow a circular economy 2.3.3 Building capacity for reprocessing and manufacturing of recycled product nationally 2.3.4 Harmonising standards, regulations and messaging across jurisdictions 2.4 Transitioning to A Sustainable Plastics Economy 2.4.1 Extended Producer Responsibility 2.4.2 Producer Responsibility Organisation 2.4.3 Halal rPET 2.4.4 Communicating circularity and sustainability 2.4.5 Other key enablers CHAPTER 3 - SETTING NATIONAL TARGETS 3.1 Problematic SUPs 3.2 Plastic Packaging Recyled 3.3 Plastic Packaging Recyclability 3.4 Recycled Content 3.5 Collected For Recycling (CFR) rate 3.6 Halal rPET CHAPTER 4 - ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES CHAPTER 5 - WAY FORWARD 5.1 National Governance for Plastic Circularity 5.1.1 National Steering Committee 5.1.2 Technical Committee 5.1.3 Think Tank 6 8 9 - 12 13 - 20 13 13 14 15 19 21 - 34 21 22 23 23 23 28 29 30 30 31 32 33 34 35 - 40 35 36 36 37 38 38 41 - 46 47 47 47 47 47 2021-2030 5 Abbreviations CAGR CFR C&D EMF EOL EPR EPS ESG E&E FMCG HDPE LDPE LLDPE MAREA MASPA MFA MNC MPMA MPRA MRF MSW Mt PE PET PP PRO PS PVC R&D rPET SAS SDG UNEP WWF ZWM compound annual growth rate Collected-for-recycling construction and demolition Ellen MacArthur Foundation end-of-life extended producer responsibility expanded polystyrene environment, social and governance electrical & electronics fast moving consumer goods high-density polyethylene low-density polyethylene linear low-density polyethylene Malaysia Recycling Alliance Malaysia Sustainable Plastic Alliance Material flow analysis Multi-national company Malaysia Plastic Manufacturing Association Malaysian Plastic Recycling Association material recovery facility municipal solid waste million tonnes polyethylene polyethylene terephthalate polypropylene producer responsibility organisation polystyrene polyvinyl chloride research and development recycled PET separation at source Sustainable Development Goal of the United Nations United Nation Environment Programme World Wildlife Fund Zero Waste Malaysia 2021-2030 6 Malaysia Plastics Sustainability Roadmap 2021-2030 7 Executive Summary Plastic pollution and marine litter are global crises that need to be addressed in a systematic approach along the entire plastic value chain. As Malaysia has always promoted sustainable development by balancing economic growth with environmental protection and societal well-being, this Roadmap will be used to guide the country towards a sustainable plastic economy, enabled through the principles of circularity. A circular economy for plastics is based on the principles of designing out waste and pollution, while ensuring that the use of plastics offers the highest environmental, social, and economic benefits to the population. Achieving a circular economy for plastics ensures that problematic and unnecessary plastics are phased out up-front, and that plastics at the end of life-cycles are designed to be reused, recycled, or disposed of in a clean and sanitary way, and safely returned to nature where there is any leakage from collection systems. As well as benefitting the environment, this approach will create innovation in materials and processes in Malaysia, boosting the country’s economic competitiveness. It also provides significant environmental and public health benefits to the nation. This document outlines strategies and action plans to achieve greater levels of plastic circularity in Malaysia. The Roadmap is based on science and has been developed in an inclusive manner. The Government conducted a study to understand the concept and mechanisms of a circular economy, and the current ecosystem including policy, regulations, technology, research & development and financing opportunities for plastic from production to end-of-life treatment in Malaysia. Existing options and future opportunities to improve plastic circularity were tested for the viability in the Malaysian economic and regulatory context. This was done by engaging with representatives from public and private stakeholders, civil societies, academicians, as well as financial institutions. What is clear, is that success will only be achieved through a whole nation approach. Each and every part of the society has its part to play and this is a journey that we are all in together. 2021-2030 8 Biodegradable plastics States adopting and implementing Act 672 (Solid Waste and Public Cleansing management Act 2007) - WP (Kuala Lumpur & Putrajaya), Negeri Sembilan, Melaka, Johor, Pahang, Kedah and Perlis. Referring to plastics usage in automotive manufacturing for a range of parts and components. Act-State A plastic in which all the organic carbon can be converted into biomass, water, carbon dioxide, and/or methane via the action of naturally occurring microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi, in timeframes consistent with the ambient conditions of the disposal method. (ASTM) Circular economy The polymerization of long polymer chains into monomers through a chemical reaction by means of heat and/or chemical agents to produce monomer, chemical raw materials and/or fuels. Automotive sector Chemical recycling As envisioned in cradle-to-cradle thinking, the circular economy is defined as an economic model in which resources like plastics are used more efficiently through the three guiding principles of “reduce, reuse and recycle” where possible, while redesigning materials to return to nature if they escape the loop. Collected-for-recycling (CFR) Denotes the tonnage or percentage of a particular resin collected through the informal and formal collection sectors within the country, which is then sold to processors and/or recyclers for recycling purposes, as compared to total plastic waste generation. CFR = Plastic waste collected and accepted for recycling process / total plastic waste generated Plastic that undergoes degradation by biological processes during composting to yield CO2, water, inorganic compounds, and biomass at a rate consistent with other known compostable materials and that leaves no visible, distinguishable, or toxic residue (ASTM). Compostable plasticsConstruction sector Referring to application of plastics in construction sector, including insulation, roofing, pipes, and laminates. Companies which produce packaging material by converting raw material. Deposit Return System A system in which a surcharge is added to the product price on certain products and containers. When consumers return these containers or products after they have become waste, the surcharge is refunded. Refers to actors at the post-consumption stage, including waste management companies, the informal sector, recyclers, and other end-of-life treatment solution providers. Downstream Converter Electrical & electronics Referring to plastics application in E&E products as well as for its packaging. End of the product lifecycle which prevents users from receiving benefits, indicating that the product is at the end of its useful life. End-of-lifeExpanded polystyrene Expanded polystyrene, manufactured from styrene, is a thermal plastic material supplied to moulders in the form of a polystyrene bead. The beads, which contain a blowing agent, are processed and moulded into low-density foam articles, such as protective packaging, and foam insulation for building and construction. Glossary & Working Definition 2021-2030 9 An environmental policy tool that makes producers responsible for the entire life cycle of the products that they introduce on the market, from their design until end-of-life (including waste collection and recycling). Extended producer responsibility Homogeneous plastics Products that move off the shelves of retail shops quickly, which therefore require constant replenishing. Fast-moving consumer goods include processed foods, prepared meals, beverages, baked goods, fresh foods, frozen foods, ready-to-eat, consumer electronics, medicines (medication that can be purchased without a prescription), cleaning products, cosmetics and toiletries, as well as office supplies. Consist of self-employed individual plastic waste collectors includes scavengers, waste pickers, junk shops, aggregators, scrap dealers that play a significant role in the collection and recovery of reusable or recyclable waste, either directly from the source where no formal collection systems exist, hauler trucks, or landfills and dumpsites, and offered for sale to recyclers directly or through intermediaries to earn a livelihood. Fast-moving consumer goods The same type of plastic scraps and clean with no residue contained. Low-density polyethylene Domestic household waste collection method, typically in urban and suburban areas, where the residents sort their domestic waste according to material type. It is usually accomplished by personnel using specially built vehicles to pick up household waste in provided bins that are acceptable to, or prescribed by, the municipality and are placed on the kerb. Informal sector High-density polyethylene (HDPE) is famous for its tensile strength and ability to stand high temperatures. HDPE is used in wide variety of application, including bottles, durable containers, grocery bags, plastic pipe, water coolers as well as fuel tanks, inner and outer protective covers for automotive application. High-density polyethylene Kerbside collection This type of plastic has excellent resistance to acids, bases and vegetable oils. LDPE has significantly relative transparency, toughness, and flexibility, which make it ideal for both packaging and nonpackaging application such as meat and poultry wrapping, dairy products, snacks and sweets, frozen food bags, baked goods. Linear low-density polyethylene This type of low-density polyethylene increases the degree of crystallinity, which results in impact strength and higher tensile than LDPE. This polyethylene can be processed into thinner films with better environmental stress crack resistance. LLDPE is used predominantly in film applications, but can also be used in cable covering, toys, lids, buckets and containers, and pipes. Companies which produce plastic products by converting raw/ recycled material. ManufacturerMaterial flow analysis An analytical method to quantify flows and stocks of materials or substances in a well-defined system. Amount of loss when: (i) plastic resins are not recycled into product (based on best circular scenario for that particular resin); or (ii) the resins are not recycled at all (e.g. when disposed of in a landfill). Material value unlocked Refers to potential monetary benefit from plastic recycling. Material value unlocked = value yield x CFR rate The processing of plastic waste into secondary raw material or products without significantly changing the chemical structure of the material – (as defined by Basel Convention). Mechanical recycling Material value loss Midstream Refers to actors at the distribution and consumption stage such as wholesalers, distributors, traders, retailers and consumers. Municipal waste / municipal solid waste Refer to any substances or scrap materials which the user discards or intends to discard everyday such as product packaging, clothing, bottles, food scrap, etc. Plastic which is inadequately disposed of or leaks out of collection systems. Mismanaged plastic waste 2021-2030 10 States not adopting Act 672 (Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Management Act 2007) – Sabah (including WP Labuan), Pulau Pinang, Perak, Selangor, Terengganu, Kelantan, Sarawak. Non Act-State Plastics Companies who introduce plastic into the market, comprises of producers, manufacturers, importers, converters and brand owners.These companies are obliged to pay an eco-modulated fees structure to compensate the potential impact of plastic introduced into the market. Plastic leakage is the potential amount of macro- and micro plastics that are not kept in a circular loop or properly managed at their end-of-life, thus leaking into the environment. Obliged parties Synthetic or semi-synthetic material made of petroleum. Polyethylene terephthalate Also known as PE and used in polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). Plastic leakage Packaged daily necessities application using plastics for various products including processed foods, beverages, dry foods, fresh foods, baked food, cosmetics and toiletries, ready-to-eat, frozen foods, consumer electronics, health and hygiene products, office supplies and stationery. Packaging sector Polyethylene Polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, is a strong, durable and recyclable material that is used for soda bottles, water bottles and food jars. Polypropylene Polypropylene, also known as PP, is a food-safe plastic. It’s used to hold all kinds of foods,beverages and medications. It can also be used to make carpeting, roof membranes and fabric. Polystyrene is a hard, solid plastic, that is often used in products that require clarity, such as food packaging and laboratory ware. When combined with various colorants, additives or other plastics, polystyrene is used to make appliances, electronics, automobile parts, toys, gardening pots and equipment and more. PolystyrenePolyvinyl chloride A polymer of vinyl chloride used to make a diverse range of cost-effective products with various levels of technical performance suited to a wide range of applications. PVC products include everything from medical devices such as medical tubing and blood bags, to footwear, electrical cables; packaging, stationery, profiles and toys. The status after an item has been used for its intended purpose. Post-consumer material may be generated by household or commercial establishments. Recyclable Characteristic of a product, packaging, or associated component that can be diverted from the waste stream through available processes and programs and can be collected, processed, and returned to use in the form of raw materials or products Recycled plastic divided by the total amount of plastic waste generated. Material that is reused and avoided is not included in the recycling rate. Recyling rate = recycled plastic / total amount of plastic waste generated Recycling rate (Plastic) Post-consumer Resin Substances which can be organic or inorganic in nature and widely used as raw materials in the manufacturing of plastic products Reverse vending machine A device that accepts used (empty) beverage containers like bottles and cans and returns money, points, rewards to the user. Characteristics of a product that can be used in the same form for the same or a different purpose. In this case, the product does not become a waste. Reusable 2021-2030 11 Recycled PET (rPET) stands for recycled polyethylene terephthalate. PET is a strong, durable and recyclable material that is used for soda bottles, water bottles and food jars, while rPET can be made into such products as blankets, insulation, car parts, shoes and more. Recycled PET Sustainable design Separation at source (SAS) requires the consumers to sort their waste into categories, to be disposed of and recycled separately. Mainly refers to actors at the production level such as resin producers, plastics manufacturers (also referred to as converters), importers and brand owners. Separation at source The integration of environmental aspects into the product development process, by balancing ecological and economic requirements. Sustainable design should consider environmental aspects at all stages of the product development process, striving for products which make the lowest possible environmental impact throughout the product life cycle. volume yield X price yield, where: volume yield = output volume / input volume, and price yield = price for recycled resin / price for most valuable recycled resin Upstream Common plastic items intended to be used only once by consumers before they are disposed of. Single-use plastics Value yield 2021-2030 12 Plastics have become one of the most utilised and important materials in our lives due to its versatility, durability, flexibility and convenience, in addition to being lightweight and low-cost. This is reflected in the production of plastics which have doubled since 2000, outpacing all other bulk materials such as steel, aluminium and cement . In 2019, global plastics production reached 368 million tonnes and the annual global production of plastics is projected to reach 600 million tonnes in 2050, almost double the figure recorded in 2015 . The growth of plastics consumption is in parallel with its production. As emerging economies grow, their consumption of plastics is projected to surge accordingly. The global plastics market size increased from USD502 billion in 2015 to USD568.9 billion in 2019 and USD579.7 billion in 2020 . It is projected to grow to USD616.82 billion in 2028, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.0% in the forecast period, which is from 2021-2028. Polypropylene (PP), low density polyethylene (LDPE/LLDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are the most produced resin type globally. Figure 1 shows the trend for global production of key plastic resin (1980 – 2050). Demand for plastic production and usage cuts across multiple economic sectors. Demand for plastics is particularly high in the food & beverage packaging, consumer goods packaging, automotive, and electrical & electronics sectors. Plastics have the ability to ensure food quality, minimise food deterioration and avoid contamination, while providing flexibility, elasticity and durability. The packaging sector consumes the largest proportion of plastics, accounting for 36% of global plastics production in 2015. The upward trend is expected to continue, consistent with the plastics production projection for 2020 – 2050. Since most plastic packaging is designed as single-use plastics, it is report ed to contribute half of all plastic waste in 2015. The construction sector is the second largest consumer of plastics (16%), followed by textiles (14%) . In terms of resins used, polyolefin-based plastics comprise the largest share globally. Specifically, the polyethylene (PE) product segment is the most commonly used resin with over 30% market share. PE Resins (including HDPE, LDPE/LLDPE) are widely used for packaging applications due to its superior properties such as durability, cost and efficiency . CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 3 4 5 1 2 1.1.1 The global plastics industry 1.1 Overview of Global and Malaysia Plastics Landscape 1 2 3 4 5 6 IEA. 2018. The future of petrochemicals: Towards more sustainable plas�cs and fer�lizers. Paris. Interna�onal Energy Agency Ibid. Sta�sta. 2021. Global Market Value of Plas�c. www.sta�sta.com/sta�s�cs/1060583/global-market-value-of-plas�c [20 September 2021] Sco�, A., Pickard, S., Sharp, S. 2020. Phasing out Plas�cs. h�ps://odi.org/en/publica�ons/phasing-out-plas�cs/ [20 September 2021] Market Research Future. 2021. Global Plas�cs Market by Type, Size, Growth and Forecast to 2027, h�ps://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/plas�cs-market-8347 [3 September 2021] IEA. 2020. Produc�on of key thermoplas�cs 1980-2050. Paris. Interna�onal Energy Agency 2021-2030 Key thermoplas�cs PET HDPE PVC LDPE PP PS Other 6 Figure 1: Global production trend on key resin (1980 - 2050) 1980 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 13 The magnitude of the problem of mismanaged plastics lies in the fact that plastics can persist for several decades. When plastics break-up it can create microplastics which might be invisible to the human eye but are harmful to natural ecosystems when it accumulated in the environment. Based on studies conducted on plastic waste that has ended up in shorelines and coastal regions, researchers have found that around 79% of microplastics are less than 5 years old. The need to tackle plastic pollution in general and microplastics specifically is live and urgent. Close to 370 million tonnes of plastic were consumed in 2019, and overall plastic waste collection volumes were estimated to be 45% to 50% of the total consumption. The global plastic waste management market size is expected to increase from USD32.9 billion in 2019 to USD239.4 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 3.05% over the 2020-2025 forecast period. However, the reality is that plastic waste management is inadequate at a global level. Globally, one third of plastics (32%) ends up in the natural environment as mismanaged waste. The majority of this ends up on land, which then makes its way into the marine environment. Even when it is properly collected and disposed of, less than a third of plastics waste is recycled while the remainder either sent to landfills or incinerated or sent for energy recovery. A 2014 study by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) estimated the natural capital cost of plastics resulting from environmental degradation, contributions to climate change, and health impacts amounted to USD75 billion annually in the consumer goods industry alone . Whereas WWF found out that the pollution, emissions and clean-up costs of plastic produced in 2019 alone could be USD3.7 trillion. It is also estimated that 11 million tonnes of plastic waste are entering the ocean every year . Packaging accounts for more than 40% of overall plastic consumption and comprises more than 55% of total global plastic waste.However, less than 15% of the plastic packaging waste generated is collected for recycling and huge amounts leak into the environment. This not only results in a yearly losses of USD80 to 120 billion, but without any intervention or mitigation, there could be more plastic than fish (by weight) in the ocean by 2050 . 9 8 10 7 1.1.2 The global plastic challenges 7 8 9 10 European Metal Recycling. 2020. Global Plas�c Waste Management Market Report and Forecast 2020-2025. h�ps://www.expertmarketresearch.com/files/images/Global-Plas�c Waste-Management-Market-Report-and-Forecast-2020-2025.png [23 September 2021] UNEP. 2014. Valuing plas�c: the business case for measuring, managing and disclosing plas�c use in the consumer goods industry. Nairobi. United Na�ons Environment Programme World Wildlife Fund. 2021. Plas�cs: The costs to society, the environment and the economy. h�ps://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/wwf pctsee report english.pdf [20 September 2021] Ellen MacArthur Founda�on. 2017. The New Plas�cs Economy: Rethinking the future of plas�cs & catalysing ac�ons. h�ps://ellenmacarthurfounda�on.org/the-new-plas�cs economy-rethinking-the-future-of-plas�cs-and-catalysing [22 September 2021] Urbanisation Industrialisation Economic Growth Lifestyle Change 2021-2030 14 Factors contributing to increasing plastic waste generation . The plastics industry contributes a significant amount to Malaysia’s economy. A total turnover of RM33.10 billion was registered in 2019 , representing an increase of 6.8% from RM30.98 billion in 2018. Export grew by 2.9% from RM14.60 billion in 2018 to RM15.03 billion in 2019, while import of plastic products grew 5.4% to RM11.89 billion . Exports however declined by 11% to RM13.3 billion in 2020 due to a weaker global economy caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Looking from the resin importation and production perspective, Malaysia is a net exporter of plastic resin. According to Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), the country imported close to 3.1 million tonnes of resin in 2019, while exporting 3.5 million tonnes. In total, Malaysia’s consumption of key resin adds up to 1.7 million tonnes, with the largest volumes comprised of PP, PE, LDPE/LLDPE, HDPE and PET (for polyester and packaging purposes). Detailed volume of resin produced and consumed can be found in Figure 2 . In terms of consumption , the packaging, electrical & electronics (E&E), construction and automotive sectors account for 91% of the Malaysian plastics manufacturing industry’s RM33.10 billion annual turnover (see Figure 3 for details). Packaging is the largest end-use sector, consuming 48% of resin to produce plastic bags, containers, films, plates, sheets, foil, strip bottles and boxes. Characteristics such as flexibility, strength, lightness, stability, impermeability, and ease of sterilization make plastics an ideal packaging material for all types of commercial and industrial users, in both flexible and rigid formats. The E&E comes is the second largest consumer, with 27% of total resin consumption and mainly used for electrical components/ parts and home appliances such as casings for television sets, radios, parts for 11 12 13 1.1.3 Malaysia plastic landscape Plastics production 11 12 13 Malaysia Plas�c Manufacturer Associa�on. 2020. Annual Report 2020. h�ps://mpma.org.my/v4/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/MPMA-AR2020-FINAL-30092020.pdf [22 September 2021] Ministry of Interna�onal Trade and Industry. 2019. MITI Report 2019. h�ps://www.mi�.gov.my/mi�/resources/MITI%20Report/MITI REPORT 2019.pdf [21 September 2021] World Bank. 2021. Market Study for Malaysia: Plas�c Circularity Opportuni�es and Barriers 2021-2030 15 air-conditioning units, telephones and accessories. Construction and automotive are the third largest consuming sectors (8%), where plastics are typically used for insulation, roofing, pipes and laminates for construction due to its durability and resistance to corrosion, effective insulation, cost-efficiency, hygiene and ease of installation, operation and maintenance. Plastics provide energy absorption, weight reduction and innovative design, while contributing to passenger safety, which is crucial in the automotive sector. Plastics are used to manufacture a range of exterior and interior parts and components, from engine components to chassis, exterior to interior, to electrical and safety units. Household, agriculture and others use the remaining resin at 3% each, mainly due to plastics’ resistance to aggressive environment and to most chemicals, making it suitable for products that require longer lifespan. Malaysia’s annual per capita plastic packaging consumption is high among all the Southeast Asian countries at 16.78 kg/person . Total household plastic packaging consumption in the country was estimated at 523,000 metric tonnes in 2020. This consumption is mainly driven by private households, small businesses, and other end users, such as schools, hospitals, and government buildings. 14 15 14 Packaging Electrical & Electronics Automotive Construction Household Agriculture Others 48% 27% 8% 8% 3% 3% 3% Figure 3: Plastic end-use by sector in Malaysia in 2019 15 Figure 2: Production and trade volume of key resins in Malaysia in 2019, in tonnes. Data collated based on World Bank’s Material Flow Analysis. Production data based on industry sources . World Wildlife Fund. 2021. Plas�c packaging in Southeast Asia and China. h�ps://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/resource/ Plas�c Packaging in SE Asia and China2020 WWF%20-%20Copy.pdf [19 September 2021] World Bank. 2021. Market study for Malaysia: plas�c circularity opportuni�es and barriers. Washington. The World Bank 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 PET packaging local production local consumption PET polyester PP HDPE LDPE/LLDPE 2021-2030 16 Based on the study by World Bank on plastic circularity opportunities in Malaysia, it was reported that only 24% of plastics (from four main resins (PET, PP, LDPE/LLDPE and HDPE)) introduced to the market in 2019 were recycled . While 13% were either being processed for energy recovery or being sent to sanitary landfill, the remaining 63% were not recycled or disposed of in proper facilities, which contributed to leakage into the environment, as seen in Figure 4. Waste management systems are constantly challenged by increasing waste generation and the limited resources and infrastructures in place, with plastics providing the second highest amount of overall domestic waste . Malaysian household waste generation varies geographically and by economic status, ranging from 0.85 to 1.5kg per person per day. Based on the estimated population, an annual post-consumer plastic waste generation was 1.07 million tonnes in 2016 . Comprising mostly PET, PP, LDPE/LLDPE, and HDPE, this figure rose to 1.4 million tonnes in 2019. Around 0.14 – 0.37 million tonnes of mismanaged plastic waste leaked into the ocean, as reported by Jenna Jambeck in 2016. This figure grows exponentially with increased plastic waste. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 16 17 18 17 16 18 Magnitude of the problem Figure 4: Material flow analysis on four main resins, 2019 NSWMD. 2013. Survey on SW Composi�on, Characteris�cs & Exis�ng Prac�ce of SW Recycling in Malaysia. Putrajaya. Department of Na�onal Solid Waste Management. WWF Malaysia. 2020. Study on EPR scheme assessment for packaging waste in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya. World Wildlife Fund Malaysia World Bank. 2021. Market study for Malaysia: plas�c circularity opportuni�es and barriers. Washington. The World Bank Including virgin + recycled resin converted locally + imported end packaged product – exported plas�c product Plas�cs produced into products which consumed and disposed in 2019 only Stocks/inventory and yet to be consumed/disposed Plas�c recycling (2019) rates; PS, PVC, Others – less recycling value, hazardous & no recycling technology Plas�c waste disposed in legally operated landfill, e.g.: Bukit Tagar Sanitary Landfill, Worldwide Landfill Park Waste-to-Energy facility, e.g.: WTE plant (Langkawi & Kajang), landfill gas (Bukit Tagar & Jeram), processed engineered fuel (ResourceCo) Contaminated with other substances including organic waste & ink + leaked from the SWM stream + illegal dumping; product by-design is not recycling friendly, less recycling value, no recycling technology Illegal dumping Including illegal recycling facili�es, e.g.: Jenjarom & Sg. Petani Plas�cs li�ered remains on land Plas�cs li�ered found on coastal areas as well as in the ocean, not including ghost nets and abandoned fishing gears (fishing lines, buoy, etc.) 2021-2030 17 Plastic brought to the market 1.69MT 1 Plastic disposed (2019) 1.4MT 2 Future disposal 0.29MT 3 Plastic recycled 0.32MT (24%) 4 Plastic not recycled / proper landfill 0.89MT (63%) 7 Plastic disposed in unsanitary landfill 0.59MT (66%) 8 Plastic openly burned 0.07MT (7%)9 Plastic leakages (littered) 0.01MT (1%) 10 Plastic leakages (marine debris) 0.22MT (24%) 11 32% PET packaging, 30% PP, 28% HDPE, 10% LDPE material processed [excluding PS, PVC, Other]* 2-5% process loss during recycling Plastic in energy recovery 0.05MT (3%) 6 Plastic in sanitary landfill 0.14MT (10%) 5 PET - packaging PET - polyester PP LDPE/LLDPE HDPE Resin Average CFR rate (%) 36.5 79 29 91 109 Value yield (%) Material value unlocked (%) Material value loss (USD million)/year Market potential Table 1: Potential value loss for key resins, 2019 19 20 World Bank. 2021. Market study for Malaysia: plas�c circularity opportuni�es and barriers. Washington. The World Bank ibid However, due to a 24% recycling rate of plastic and a value yield of 77% from the resins which were recycled, only USD234 million (19%) per year is being unlocked. This results in USD1.0 to 1.1 billion of potential material value that is untapped. Table 1 summarizes the potential value loss for these key resins for 2019. In 2019, 1.69 million tonnes of PET, PP, LDPE/LLDPE and HDPE were brought into the Malaysian market, and 1.4 million tonnes were estimated to be disposed (managed or unmanaged) in the same year. The total material value disposed of, if recycled, had the potential value equal to USD1.3 billion. 2021-2030 2.5 67 2 26 30 75 22 259 285 10 84 8 258 283 28 74 20 327 376 18 Figure 5: Key challenges mapping Lack of domestic R&D on sustainable design and material innovation for end product (extrusion technology, eco and better performing resins) industry led - home country Lack of circularity integration in corporate decision-making (manufacturing/production) Lack of awareness of responsible consumption among consumers(behaviour) Consumers price sensitivity towards alternative product and services (market sentiment) Limited responsible investment for innovative SMEs (access to financing from local financial institution) Lack of clarity around using recycled content in food grade applications Absence of extended producers responsibility (EPR) scheme Unsatisfactory quality of local plastic waste (SAS- buy back) Limited materials recovery (recycling) capacity (CFR, distribution of facilities in the country) lack of alternative end-of-life solutions for local plastic waste (recycling technology) Absence of macro data to monitor plastic production, consumption, plastic waste collection and materials recovery (including recycling) Unclear plan to phase-out problematic SUPs Inadequate and incoherent policies around plastic consumption and disposal (state vs non-state act) Unsatisfactory enforcement of policies (SAS, illegal recycling facilities) 1 Im p ac t Control 2 34 1.2 Challenges to Plastics Circularity and Sustainability in Malaysia Based on a comprehensives literature review and stakeholder consultation, 14 key challenges have been identified across plastics value chain which require specific interventions with pragmatic approaches. These challenges have been analysed in terms of their root causes that can be grouped into four categories: market/economy, technology, regulatory, and culture/society. These have been mapped to reflect the level of control and impact as seen in Figure 5. The first quadrant represents key challenges that require industry interventions, while key challenges in the 2nd quadrant calls for government interventions. The 3rd quadrant highlights the enforcement issues and the 4th quadrant is about providing funding for R&D activities. Table 2 further explains the challenges that may create bottlenecks for plastics circularity and sustainability in Malaysia. 2021-2030 19 Lack of clarity around using recycled content in food grade applications Absence of extended producers responsibility (EPR) scheme Unsatisfactory quality of local plastic waste (SAS – buy back) Limited materials recovery (recycling) capacity (CFR, distribution of facilities in the country) Lack of alternative end-of-life solutions for local plastic waste (recycling technology) Absence of macro data to monitor plastic production, consumption, plastic waste collection and materials recovery (including recycling) Lack of circularity integration in corporate decision-making (manufacturing/ production) Lack of awareness on responsible consumption among consumers (behaviour) Consumers’ price sensitivity towards alternative products and services (market sentiment) Limited responsible investment for innovative SMEs (access to financing from local financial institution) Lack of domestic R&D on sustainable design and material innovation for end product (extrusion technology, eco and better performing resins) – industry led – home country Inadequate and incoherent policies around plastic consumption and disposal (state vs non-state act Unsatisfactory enforcement of policies (SAS, illegal recycling facilities) Unclear plan to phase-out problematic SUPs Challenges Bottlenecks/Barriers Uncertainties and unclear policy direction, as well as guidelines around the use of recycled content have limited the usage of locally produced recycled resin in F&B packaging. This also relates to the concern over halal status for food-contact packaging made of recycled resin. The lack of practicing separation at source among households contributes to the low-quality waste stream. Consumers should be incentivised or rewarded through a buy-back program to encour age them to segregate and send their plastic waste to a proper drop-off/recycling centre. The adoption of EPR schemes in Malaysia has been limited to voluntary efforts from the private sector around packaging. EPR schemes are regarded as useful interventions for reducing plastic pollution, as they help to shift the responsibility of end-of-life treatment to producers or importers who have introduced the products into the market place. Such schemes can promote reducing waste at source, improve product design, and encourage producers to explore circular business models. Only 24% of the total plastic waste are being collected for recycling. The lack of recovery activities/processes leads to low-quality waste and uneven distribution of facilities across geographies. Alternative EOL solutions to mechanical recycling, such as chemical recycling, are limited in application. While mechanical recycling may be the best available technology for rigid plastic, chemical recycling should be able to take care of the soft-plastic/films, etc. Information on production volumes per plastic application is lacking, as is data on plastics consumption, waste collection, and recycling. This lack of national-level data, and independent and authoritative source of information, poses obstacles for various value chains as well as the government. While Malaysia does not plan to outright ban any particular plastic product, it is now clear that problematic SUPs need to be phased-out. However, there are no details on the plan. Identification of a list of problematic SUPs is needed at the national level prior to phasing them out. Circularity integration is lacking in the steps of product design, procurement and production due to concerns over cost, quality and performance. Low awareness level and knowledge around the circular economy among corporates also hinders the adoption of circular models in their business operations. Inadequate education efforts and convenience leads to a lack of awareness of responsible consumption among consumers. Levels of awareness also differs among different segments of consumers, where young, urban consumers are relatively more conscientious in their consumption behaviours than other age and geographical groups. Malaysian consumers are convenience- and cost driven. The premium price makes a product or service less appealing to consumers, thus discouraging brand owners from widely adopting circular solutions into their product and service portfolios. The recycling industry and wider circular economy innovation is often misunderstood and not seen as an investable opportunity by local financial institutions. Interventions that allow for more accessible financing can help innovative SMEs grow and contribute toward plastic circularity and sustainability. There is lack of R&D funding for sustainable design and material innovations both from the government and within the private sector. To move forward, more funding needs to be made available to support R&D endeavours in extrusion technology, producing sustainable and better performing resin as well as products. The solid waste management differs in Act 672 state and non-state. This led into inconsistent implementation at a nationwide scale. Effective enforcement across the value chain is important in improving waste management. Lack of enforcement will contribute to low compliance with the waste segregation at source mandate, and lax oversight of the recycling industry. This creates a blurred line between legal and illegal operations. 2021-2030 Table 2: Summary of challenges to plastics circularity and sustainability in Malaysia 20 CHAPTER 2 - MALAYSIA PLASTICS SUSTAINABILITY ROADMAP 2.1 Objective To sustainably address plastic pollution in Malaysia, ensuring economic development, environmental protection and societal wellbeing To provide guidance and promote sustainable business practices in ensuring plastics circularity and sustainability through circular economy approach To harmonise actions along plastic value chain through adoption of life cycle approach 2021-2030 21 2.2 Scope Table 3: Resin classification (adopted from American Chemistry Council) plastic bottles for soft drinks, water, juice, food jars ovenable film and microwavable food trays textile, monofilament, carpet, strapping, films and engineering mouldings rFiber: carpet, fleece jacket, comforter fill, bags, etc rPET (food-grade): containers for food, beverages bottles rPET (non food-grade): Films, sheets, strapping USE (virgin resin) USE (recycled resin) 1 PET This Roadmap will cover four types of resin: PP, PET, HDPE and LDPE/LLDPE. These resins are the most highly produced and disposed of in Malaysia, commonly used for single-use packaging with shorter application lifetimes and possess the highest recyclable value as reflected in Table 3. As mentioned in Section 1.2, four sectors have been identified as the top end-users of plastics; packaging, electrical and electron ics, construction and automotive. In the first and second phase of this Roadmap, effort is concentrated on ensuring plastic sustainability and circularity in the packaging sector. As we progress along, the effort will be extended to the remaining sectors accordingly. In-line with the government’s circular economy and sustainability agenda in the 12th Malaysia Plan, this Roadmap will be part of national efforts to balance between socioeconomic development and environmental sustainability. Supporting the Malaysia Roadmap towards Zero Single-Use Plastics, the aim and target of this Roadmap is to set Malaysia on a pathway to plastics sustainability for 2030, and beyond. To ensure implementation of the Roadmap is monitored and kept up-to-date, a mid-term review will be carried out in 2026. The implementation of this Roadmap calls for whole-of-nation participation, involving federal and state authorities, industry players, academia, civil societies, and the public. As a living document, this Roadmap will be updated from time to time, taking into account advancements in technology and real-time circumstances in accordance with national priorities. 2 HDPE 4 LDPE LLDPE 5 PP packaging application: shampoo bottles, plastic bags automotive application: fuel tanks, inner and outer protective covers rHDPE for packaging application rHDPE for industrial application: automotive and electronics components USE (virgin resin) USE (recycled resin) films for both packaging and non-packaging application such as meat and poultry wrapping, dairy products, snacks and sweets, frozen food bags, baked goods rLDPE/rLLDPE for plastic lumber, furniture, trash bags, sheeting, films for agriculture, flooring USE (virgin resin) USE (recycled resin) rigid and flexible packaging automotive application - battery cases and trays, bumpers, fender liners, interior trim, instrumental panels and door trims fibres and fabrics rPP for packaging application rPP for industrial application: automotive, electronics and furniture industries USE (virgin resin) USE (recycled resin) 2021-2030 22 mismanaged waste. This can be achieved through a proper kerbside collection, where waste is separated according to types to reduce contamination. Community collection centres also play a significant role in collecting more plastic waste as it is within reach, hence making it easier for the public to drop-off their recyclables. Reward scheme like reverse vending machines, or buy-back programmes can be introduced to incentivise recycling effort and increase awareness among the public. A range of actions are required to achieve higher-quality outcomes in sorting facilities. These should include efforts to mainstream locally fragmented informal sectors/scavengers. The role played by informal sectors has the potential to contribute to the overall waste management ecosystem. Malaysia should start tapping the potential which lies within informal sectors by embarking on initiatives such as formal registration processes through a controlled mechanism. In addition, changes to industry standards and contractual arrangements that demand a higher-quality sorting outcome will facilitate improvements along with more robust data collection. To complement the measures above, Malaysia will also take necessary action in phasing out the most problematic single-use plastics based on an application’s necessity, recyclability, toxicity, disruption to recycling process, and probability of being mismanaged. The list will be prioritised based on consumption, impact and available alternatives . Certain types of exemption may be provided for deployment of biodegradable technology to mitigate initial impact on industry and consumers. New standards will be developed to govern this and reference can be made with other internationally accepted standards such as the ASTM D6400-05, D5338-09, ISO 17088, ISO 14855-2, ASTM D7081-05, D6691-05, ISO 14852-199, ISO 14851 and BSI PAS 9017 standards. In coming up with national problematic single-use plastic list, consultation will take place across industries and consumers to build a balanced perspective on what to be deemed as problematic plastic in Malaysia. Ellen MacArthur Founda�on. 2020. The circular economy solu�on to plas�c pollu�on. h�ps://plas�cs.ellenmacarthurfounda�on.org/breaking-the-plas�c-wave-perspec�ve [10 September 2021] 21 21 2.3 Strategies 2.3.1 Improving product design, collection and sorting outcomes 2.3.2 Market development and innovation to grow a circular economy One of the key steps in plastic sustainability is to ensure that materials are kept in circulation for as long as possible (in its highest possible value), can easily be recovered and recycled, and effectively reused. This can be done at the product design stage, as well as during the collection and sorting of plastic waste. Design is one of the key elements in the circular economy approach, where the aim is to design out waste from the ecosystem. It must consider the hazard, exposure, and energy used during the material extraction, manufacturing, consumption and end-of-life management. Improving product design includes simplifying a product to be mono-material as an alternative to flexible packaging, using recycled resin as material input without compromising product quality and performance, easy disassembly, as well as designing out problematic material. A focus on the design element of plastics allows us to produce products where material value can be optimised and can be kept in the loop for longer. As well as being designed to remain in the loop as much as possible, products also needs to be redesigned to ensure it does not harm to nature should it ends up in the environment as mismanaged waste. Mismanaged waste is currently the end-of-life scenario for 63% of plastics in Malaysia. While this Roadmap contains concrete action to reduce the level of mismanaged plastic waste, we must also ensure that Malaysia’s contribution to plastics pollution is tackled urgently. New technol ogies and standards now exist to ensure that while remaining recyclable, plastic packaging materials can return to nature safely. Malaysia will adopt new standards and the uptake of advanced technologies. Plastic waste collection and sorting need to be strengthened to ensure cleaner waste streams and reduce the amount of Developing an advanced plastic waste collection and recycling market in Malaysia requires industry to rethink the packaging, rethink the product, and rethink the business model. Three Key Innovation Strategies PHASE-OUT REUSE MATERIAL CIRCULATION Malaysia aims to achieve plastic sustainability by adopting these 2021-2030 23 Ellen MacArthur Founda�on. 2020. Upstream Innova�on: a guide to packaging solu�ons. h�ps://ellenmacarthurfounda�on.org/upstream innova�on-a-guide-to-packaging-solu�ons [19 September 2021] 22 22 PHASE-OUT “Apeel” an edible coating made from plant material that extends the shelf-life of fresh fruit and vegetables “Ooho” an edible and home compostable ‘blobs’ for beverages and condiments made from seaweed. Products that do not serve an essential function need to be indirectly phased-out through innovation. This includes development of new products that function similarly or better, without jeopardising the quality and efficiency, while remaining easily recyclable. For example, a few innovations are already being introduced in the global market to replace plastic packaging. One of them is “Apeel” - an edible coating made from plant material that extends the shelf-life of fresh fruit and vegetables, replacing the usual plastic wrapping. Another example is “Ooho”, an edible and home compostable ‘blobs’ for beverages and condiments made from seaweed.“Ooho” can be used as a sachet for takeaway sauces and condiments, as well as single-use beverage bottles and cups . “Thong Guan Industries Berhad, a local plastic converter, has produced nano stretch film that can replace the normal multi-layered stretch film, used to wrap pallets and goods. Nano stretch film is a plastic film that is not only very thin, but provides good grip and better load stability and durability. It is also resistant to tear and puncture, consistent in performance and fit for high-speed wrapping.” 2021-2030 This will not only reduce the operational cost, but also the consumption and wastage of material. 24 REUSE Table 4: Example of REUSE model implementation in Malaysia This strategy focuses on reusing packaging, rather than discarding after one use. These models have been implemented in Malaysia by local business operators through the Zero Waste Pledge Certification programme initiated by Zero Waste Malaysia (ZWM). “Zero Waste Malaysia is a non-profit organisation registered under The Registry of Malaysia and a community group based in Malaysia advocating for sustainable development and aiming to increase the local community’s awareness of sustainable living. With a vision to mainstream zero waste lifestyle, ZWM encourages the community to minimise the general waste footprint and embrace the circular economy by challenging conventional methods to reduce waste generation and utilise waste as input material .” Users refill a reusable container at home with refills delivered to the door. Users retain the ownership of the packaging and are responsible for cleaning their reusables. Minus Zero Waste Store (Johor) LiquidETC “Roving Refillery” (Selangor) PYNG Zero Waste (Johor) TM Organic Farms (Pahang) How it works Refill at home Refill on the go Example of local players Users refill a reusable container at the store – either a zero-waste store or a traditional grocery store. Users retain the ownership of the packaging and are responsible for cleaning their reusables. Seedy Zero Waste Store (Selangor) Nude The Zero Waste Store (Selangor) The Hive Bulk Food (Kuala Lumpur) Zero Waste Earth Store (Selangor) The Natural Marketplace (Selangor) Healthea Grocer (Pahang) Kita Refill (Kuala Lumpur) How it works Example of local players User Buys Container User Uses Product User Cleans At Home User Refills On The Go User Buys Container User Uses Product User Acquires Refills (in-store or online with home delivery) User Refills Container Zero Waste Malaysia. 2021. www.zerowastemalaysia.org23 2021-2030 23 25 Return at home Return on the go Users subscribe to a service provider that allows them to return empty packaging from home. A service-provider then takes care of cleaning and redistribution of the packaging. My Milk Home Delivery (Selangor) Thanks Nature Store (Selangor) How it works Example of local players Users purchase a product whereas the packaging can be returned to the seller or a drop off point. The packaging is either cleaned or the business takes care of the cleaning. Homemade4all (Kuala Lumpur) Fruitsfarm in the City (Selangor) Hup Teck Soy Sauce Factory (Perak) How it works Example of local players User Purchases Product (in returnable packaging User Uses Product User Returns Packaging (at store or at drop-off point such as mailbox) Business Cleans And Refills User Subscribes to service User Uses Product Business Picks Up Empty Packaging (Swaps with new product) User Acquires Refills (in-store or online with home delivery) Business Cleans And Refills 2021-2030 26 “KLEAN Malaysia, for example, has been collaborating with Shell Malaysia where a few units of smart RVMs are placed at some Shell stations in Kuala Lumpur. Public will be rewarded with points upon depositing their used plastic containers and bottles, and these points can be redeemed for rewards from KLEAN’s partners via the KLEAN App .” KLEAN. 2021. www.klean.asia 24 To ensure material circulation, plastic waste has to be properly collected, sorted, treated and processed into recycled resin. Besides collecting plastic waste using the conventional method, for example kerbside collection and drop-off point/ centre, Malaysia should introduce and implement initiatives such as Reverse Vending Machine (RVM) and Deposit Return Scheme (DRS). We can also leverage the existing fleet-system and logistics service to recover plastic waste from households. Similar to the ‘return at home’ or ‘return on the go’ model highlighted above, e-hailing and food delivery services can be mobilised to collect homogenous and clean plastic. 24 MATERIAL CIRCULATION 2021-2030 27 Moving forward, Malaysia should look into advanced technology to improve the efficiency of the recycling industry. Advanced recycling is one of the potential areas to be explored. It breaks down plastic material through the effect of chemical processes, converting them into their original building components, specialty polymers, new plastics feedstocks, fuel, waxes and other valuable products . In the coming years, a ground breaking process may be needed to remove colour, odour and plastic waste contaminants into the "virgin-like" resin that is the basis for plastic products . “PETRONAS Chemical Group (PCG) together with Plastic Energy Ltd. have collaborated to develop a solution that turns non-recyclable plastic waste into crude naphthalene in Malaysia. This new technology helps divert low quality, mixed plastic waste from being accumulated by turning it into naphthalene quality oil (TACOIL), which can be used to produce virgin quality polymers. In 2020, both organisations completed a feasibility study to establish a facility that converts plastic waste to crude naphthalene. Following this, both organisations will continue with the next phase of the project, which is a detailed engineering study of the facility.” The establishment of an efficient systemic loop supply chain is needed to enhance recycling industries and market competitiveness. This requires a joint effort from all sectors, from the collection, sorting and recycling to the manufacturing and post-consumer, with legislation and enforcement in place . The most significant limitation of recycling is that not all materials can be recycled. Public’s confusion about types of materials that can be recycled often leads them to placing recyclables in the trash and being wasted, vice-versa. Other challenges in the recycling ecosystem are obsolete infrastructures, reduced markets for recycled materials and varieties of methods used to measure recycling performance . The lack of capability to collect plastic waste results in large annual loss of recyclable material and affects the effectiveness of recycling industry. Pre-consumer industrial waste is homogeneous and clean in nature, making recycling it much easier . However, because the volumes of post-consumer waste are far greater than those generated in commerce and industry, both post-consumer and post-industrial waste must be collected and processed together in order to attain high overall recycling rates . While attempts are being made to enhance the quality of some recyclables with market value, we should not forget that manually performed sorting procedures yields limited results. Most known common form of recycling in Malaysia is the traditional method, otherwise known as mechanical recycling, which is only feasible for homogeneous and single stream resin type. Thus, it is important to stay updated with latest sorting and recycling technologies. Since plastic products are getting more complex to fulfil business needs and might add problems to existing recycling procedures, an alternative solution to traditional recycling is needed . Advanced recycling technology picks-up where conventional recycling ends by concentrating on commonly used materials but difficult to recycle. 2.3.3 Building capacity for reprocessing and manufacturing of recycled product nationally 25 26 27 28 31 29 30 United States Environmental Protec�on Agency. 2019. Na�onal Framework for Advancing the U.S. Recycling System. h�ps://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/documents/na�onal framework.pdfepa.gov) [19 September 2021] Chen, H.L., Nath, T.K., Chong, S. et al. 2021. The plas�c waste problem in Malaysia: management, recycling and disposal of local and global plas�c waste. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 437. Patel, M., von Thienen,N., Jochem, E., Worrell, E. 2000. Recycling of plas�cs in Germany. Resources, Conserva�on and Recycling. 29 American Chemistry Council. 2021. What is Advanced Recycling? And Why is it So Important for Mee�ng the Growing Demand for Recycled Plas�cs? h�ps://www.americanchemistry.com/chemistry-in-america/news-trends/blog-post/2021/what-is-advanced-recycling and-why-is-it-so-important-for-mee�ng-the-growing-demand-for-recycled-plas�cs [17 September 2021] ibid Na�onal Geographic. 2021. Innova�ons in recycling. h�ps://www.na�onalgeographic.com/science/ar�cle/partner-content-innova�ons-in-recycling [17 September 2021] NSWMD, 2011. A Study on Plas�c Management in Peninsular Malaysia. Putrajaya. Department of Na�onal Solid Waste Management. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2021-2030 28 With Basel Convention amendments taking effect in January 2021, countries around the world need to create a recycling system that no longer depends on resources from overseas. The strict requirement of this cross-boundary movement of plastic is reducing the inflow of plastic waste (to be processed and used as raw material) and will somehow force the countries to utilise domestic plastic scrap. Subsequently, the countries will have to invest in managing their own plastic waste to be reproduced as consumer product. As a developing country, Malaysia could explore various mechanisms to encourage adoption of an effective recycling system, thus achieving the objective of circularity. Local industries are encouraged to innovate and adopt sustainable design that promote reuse of materials, recycled materials and/or improving the current complex packaging (including packaging that involve multi components or layers). Local industries are encouraged to innovate and adopt sustainable design. These mechanisms include introducing incentives for related and relevant efforts, usage of fiscal tools (i.e.: negative price incentives, eco-modulation of EPR, etc) to drive the domestic market, certifications of products as well as services opportunities. Raising the importance of circularity in business process also needs to be highlighted in the sustainability reporting of listed companies, and as Malaysia is heading towards that move, plastic circularity should be added into that. This could possibly attract more investments and generate more income, contributing to our GDP. At present, standards, regulations and messages vary widely across different ministries and agencies in Malaysia. This provides a confusing outcome for businesses and consumers looking for the right thing. Harmonising Malaysia’s standards and policies for give a clear direction of best practices will lead to better outcomes in managing plastic waste. Harmonised standards are necessary to create conditions for a true circular economy by filling in regulatory gaps on issues like material efficiency, durability, repairability, reusability, and recyclability. Standards can ensure a proper management of the supply chain and material flows (production, consumption, post-consumption phase). Most importantly, properly enforced standards give consumers and businesses a guarantee that the product or process they are using will perform according to the set expectations. When applied to the end-of-life of plastics, standards are of the utmost importance. To date, many standards in this space have taken the form of test methods rather than specifications. A test method simply sets the criteria for how a material should be tested, but does not specify the outcome of those tests. The most up-to-date standards from around the world now take the form of specifications, where pass-fail criteria are added to ensure that not only is a repeatable test method followed, but a desired outcome is achieved. It is also important that standards are shown to be equivalent to real-world performance. Harmonising and developing standards, together with relevant regulations, is not an end in itself. That said, it is an important tool to ensure that the demands for resource-efficient and environment-friendly goods and services is stimulated and increased in Malaysia. Partnership with industry and civil society remains critical for effective delivery. As much as innovation being promoted as a catalyst to circularity and sustainability, it should not disrupt the existing waste management ecosystem. Malaysia is looking forward to technologies where plastics do not degrade into microplastics and harm the people and planet. Products that fulfil such standards may be certified and labelled accordingly, upon thorough assessment by the certification body, and assured against credible standards. Malaysia also welcomes the development of technologies and standards, as well as adoption of international best standards that allow for a sustainable plastic ecosystem. Demand For Recycled Material (Local Feedstock) 2.3.4 Harmonising standards, regulations and messaging across jurisdictions 2021-2030 29 Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is one of the policy instruments under the circular economy approach that can effectively push for plastic sustainability. Through EPR, all stakeholders in the plastic value chain shall extend their financial and/or physical responsibility across plastic value chain including designing, improvement of product design, and treatment or disposal of their post-consumer products. EPR for plastic products will be implemented in a phased approach and is beyond CSR, involving all players along the plastic value chain. The scheme is to be driven by an independent entity and upon its implementation, is expected to be financially self-sustaining based on industry contributions. The implementation of the EPR scheme will begin with a voluntary scheme before transitioning to a mandatory scheme. This takes into consideration the readiness and capabilities of industry players, especially the small and medium-sized enterprises.In the first two years (2021-2022) during the Inception Phase, the government together with industry associations and relevant organisations will advocate for EPR adoption and readiness of the industry through various EPR capacity building programs, as well as implementation of INSPiRE program which will start in 2022. Before moving into a mandatory EPR scheme in 2026, adoption of Voluntary EPR Phase will be implemented nationwide between 2023 to 2025. The Government’s expectation will be for industry to participate in the Voluntary EPR phase. Obliged parties will contribute an eco-modulated fee to fund the operational cost (to collect, sort, recycle and dispose of their post-consumer waste), and this fee will differ according to type of material and its recoverability and recyclability, as well as production volume and turnover. An independent organisation referred to as the Producer Responsibility Organisation (PRO) will be in the forefront of the EPR scheme. To ensure smooth transition from voluntary to mandatory schemes, an EPR governance framework will be developed starting in 2022. This will also take into consideration the existing policies, acts and frameworks across ministries and sectors (environment, trade, consumer rights, waste management, etc.) as well as standards and other measures used globally.The EPR governance framework will incorporate the EPR target, responsibilities of each party, eco-modulated fee structure, and mechanism for product improvement. 2.4 Transitioning to A Sustainable Plastics Economy 2.4.1 Extended Producer Responsibility Before moving into a mandatory EPR scheme in 2026, adoption of Voluntary EPR Phase will be implemented nationwide between 2023 to 2025. The Government’s expectation will be for industry to participate in the Voluntary EPR phase. 2021-2030 30 Producer Responsibility Organisation (PRO) is a third-party entity that coordinates and carries out collection, sorting, and recycling of packaging waste on behalf of the producers. PRO is central for operating the EPR scheme and interacts with all stakeholders in the value chain, including public agencies and local authorities, which are traditionally in charge of waste management. Although the impact of EPR on competition depends on the contextual and design characteristics of the schemes, one central feature is the market structure at the level of Producer Responsibility Organisations, particularly the number of competing PROs offering compliance services to producers. In addition to the number of competing PROs, the possibility and existence of individual compliance schemes must also be considered. These factors will all be worked through as part of the design process for the EPR scheme. “In Malaysia, a voluntary PRO known as Malaysian Recycling Alliance (MAREA) was established in January 2021 as an industry-led, pioneering initiative towards a circular economy. Founded by 10 like-minded FMCG companies that are taking the lead in EPR in Malaysia, their goals primarily revolve around enhancing collection, promoting the use of recycled and renewable materials, as well as minimising post-consumer packaging leakage into the environment.” 2.4.2 Producer Responsibility Organisation Financing the collection and treatment of the product at the end of its life cycle by collecting fees and redistributing the corresponding financial amounts Managing the corresponding data Organising and/or supervising these activities. PROs exist to exert three main functions: EPR schemes managed by one single PRO EPR schemes managed by several non-competing PROs (e.g., they cover different product categories) EPR schemes managed by several competing PROs. The three most frequent configurations are: 2021-2030 31 There is a need to provide regulatory clarity/guidance regarding the use of recycled resin in food contact packaging through revision of the 1983 Food Act and Halal certification standards. This will reduce risk for companies that would otherwise be unwilling to produce and use recycled resin for their packaging. Previously, the existing standards for halal packaging prescribed under MS 2565:2014 Halal Packaging–General Guidelines and within the purview of the Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (JAKIM)— the agency responsible for the Islamic affairs in Malaysia. The relevant requirements are contained in MS2565:2014 section 3.2(d), stating that packaging made for direct food contact application shall not be made from recycled material. Thus, under this standard, it is clear that food-grade recycled resin cannot be used for halal food contact packaging. However, looking at the potential of bottle-to-bottle initiative as a low hanging fruit to spur the recycling rate of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) through circular economy model in Malaysia, KASA has been actively advocating the need for halal certification of recycled PET (rPET) as well as the material cleansing process to the members of the Halal Consumable Goods Working Group (WG) which consists of experts from JAKIM, Ministry of Health, Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM), MATRADE, Halal Development Corporation, Persatuan Pengguna Islam Malaysia (PPIM), academia and others. The Department of Standards Malaysia (JSM) act as the secretariat. Going forward Malaysia will recognise the use of recycled resin in producing food-contact packaging. Hence, the current development of Halal Consumable Goods-General Requirements (MS2738:2021) is expected to push the domestic, regional, as well as global halal rPET market. Local recyclers and producers are encouraged to provide better recycling facilities which are in compliance with halal cleansing requirement prescribed under MS2738:2021. Henceforth, this Roadmap focuses on the development of a halal rPET ecosystem based on the current mechanical recycling system. Looking at the increased demand for rPET globally which is projected at USD21.56 billion value in 2028, it is pertinent and necessary for local producers and recyclers to also look into other types of resins and recycling methods. 2.4.3 Halal rPET 2021-2030 32 The Sustainability Ins�tute. 2020. Engaging Consumers to Reduce and Recycle. h�ps://www.sustainability.com/thinking/engaging-consumers-to-reduce-and-recycle/ [22 September 2021] 32 One of the challenges in ensuring plastic circularity and sustainability is getting back used plastics from consumers and then transferring it to recycling plants . Without consumer participation, there will not be enough material to drive a viable circular economy for plastics. Despite the increase in awareness raising campaign to beat plastic pollution, change in consumers behaviour to embrace plastic circularity agenda is still minimal. Brand owners play an important role in conveying the message and influencing consumer behaviour to create a more circular and sustainable plastic economy. The right consumer messaging from brands can reinforce positive new beliefs among customers, shape emerging habits and ultimately nudge consumers toward more environmentally responsible behaviours, leveraging the push and pull effect. The quality of a company’s communication and its ability to strike the right tone on environmental issues, especially plastics pollution, will increasingly become a competitive advantage. Malaysian consumers – especially younger consumers – are demanding that brands tackle the problem. As a result, consumers are pushing brands to take action which in turn encourages a positive feedback loop as more and more society are influenced by the positive messaging. Similarly, awareness and behavioural change within businesses is necessary to ensure plastic sustainability is designed into supply chain. Awareness of circular economy principles, such as sustainable design, could translate directly into business decisions that improve circularity. For example, instead of using a coffee cup lid made of polystyrene, which are not easily recycled given Malaysia’s current recycling capacity, coffee shops can change to PP or HDPE cup lids which allows for higher recyclability . Advo cating positive messaging on redesigning products should be the core component of sustainability effort to tackle plastic pollution. In the past decade, there is a growing environmental awareness among individuals and communities within Malaysia. This, by and large, resulted from campaigns and education programmes organised by public interest groups which include non-governmental organisations (NGOs), civil societies and other community-based organizations. As such, these groups play an important role in contributing efforts towards sustainability and circularity through participation, advocacy, promoting awareness and education, community engagement, environmental monitoring, developing awareness projects and campaigns, research and development and lastly training and capacity building. 32 33 Hooker, L. Four solu�ons to the disposable coffee cup problem. h�ps://www.bbc.com/news/business-40951041 [19 September 2021] 2.4.4 Communicating Circularity and Sustainability 2021-2030 33 33 “With the power and expertise to engage and influence the public, NGOs and civil societies are some of the critical groups that can support in communicating the message to the public and drive behaviour change in the long term.” Research, development and innovation (R,D&I) can be a catalyst for plastic circularity and sustainability where researchers develop practical solutions. These can include designing and formulating better products, producing new technologies to improve recycling, providing alternatives to help in phasing-out problematic plastic products, or redesigning sustainable packaging with nature in mind. However, the circular economy concept is still new in Malaysia and not getting as much attention from the research funding providers as necessary. Malaysia needs to expand existing R,D&I funding to include plastic sustainability and circularity as part of its scope. A dedicated fund that focuses on specific elements, for example sustainable design, high performance materials, extrusion and recycling technologies, and industry symbiosis would be very beneficial to the industries. Beyond the classic model of funding provision, Malaysia is also looking at creating new partnerships between academia and industry. This will include developing national competency and expertise for new emerging technologies in line with international best practices and technological advancement. Financial institutions have a key role in encouraging and stimulating circularity by investing in sustainable consumption and production . According to UNEP, financial institutions can support circularity in many ways, including: 34 2.4.5 Other key enablers Research, Development And Innovation (R,D&I) To date, national-level data regarding plastics is fragmented and not comprehensive. Information of production volume per application is not accessible, neither is data on plastic consumption, plastic waste collected, and plastic waste recycled (material processed). Based on the national economic statistics from DOSM, plastic manufacturing falls under the overall manufacturing activities, making it difficult to understand the total sales of plastics by local manufacturers at end-use sector level. On the other hand,considering the lack of a harmonised plastic waste collection system and the involvement of the informal sectors, it is challenging to access the volume of plastics and the specifics such as resin type and application within the municipal waste stream on a national level. The existence of complete and consolidated data is crucial to map the market potential through the material flow analysis. As of now, data collection largely relies on voluntary reporting from the industry through various platforms. Thus, there is a need to collect data through an open data platform, where it can be done more systematically, transparently and holistically. Plastic Data Analytics Re-orienting investments towards more sustainable technologies and businesses that enhance the circularity of economies; finance restorative and regenerative business models in a sustainable manner over the long-term; start developing strategy execution pathways to contribute to the creation of a low-carbon and climate resilient through circular model; Integrating the circularity or 9-R concept (Refuse, Reuse, Reduce, Redesign, Repurpose,Remanufacture, Repair, Refurbish, Recycle) in financing policies, product development and client engagement Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) component, identify significant impacts and set targets related to resource efficiency in the transition. Alternative Financing 34 UNEP Finance Ini�a�ve. 2020. Financing Circularity: Demys�fying Finance for Circular Economies. Nairobi. United Na�on Environment Programme 2021-2030 34 The most significant step Malaysia can take is reducing unnecessary SUPs to lessen the burden on the waste management system. In order to achieve a circular economy for plastics, it is important to carefully consider what is put into the market in the first place. This commitment recognises that principle, and signals the intent of companies to actively identify problematic and unnecessary plastic packaging in their portfolio and to take action to phase-out those through redesign, innovation, and new (reuse) delivery models. CHAPTER 3 - SETTING NATIONAL TARGETS The list will be prioritized based on consumption, impact and available alternatives, developed through discussion with stakeholders. The process of phasing out problematic SUPs will start with identification of national problematic SUPs in 2022 and the overall phasing-out process will be done progressively. 3.1 Phasing out problematic SUPs The criteria listed below (but not limited to) is provided to help identify problematic or unnecessary plastic items: It is not reusable, recyclable or compostable It contains, or its manufacturing requires, hazardous chemicals that pose a significant risk to human health or the environment (applying the precautionary principle) It can be avoided (or replaced by a reuse model) while maintaining utility It hinders or disrupts the recyclability or compostability of other items It has a high likelihood of being littered or ending up in the natural environment. 2021-2030 35 36 This target aims to achieve a national plastic recycling rate of an average 25% for all locally generated post-consumer plastic packaging waste. A systemic approach is required bringing together businesses, government, and citizens – all playing key roles in stimulating the system change and behaviour change required to achieve this target. This target was set based on the recent data on the recycling rate for plastic packaging in Malaysia and feedback from the Malaysia Plastic Recycling Association and Malaysia Plastic Manufacturers Association. Target number (3) on switching to 100% recyclable will help achieve this target by having more high-quality recyclable packaging for material recovery. In a circular economy, waste and pollution are designed out, products and materials are kept in use, ensuring closing the loop for a regenerative natural system. Each process, service, product or packaging item needs to be designed to fit such ecosystem. This means that each piece of (plastic) packaging is readily recyclable after several reuse cycles. 100% recyclability rate of plastic packaging commitments are important, as the circularity of a packaging item starts with its design phase. While existing solutions are available and proven to be viable, further innovation in business models, packaging designs, collecting, sorting, and recycling technologies will be required to achieve this commitment in a viable way that reduce detrimental impact on the environment. 3.2 25% post-consumer plastic packaging to be recycled by 2025 3.3 100% recyclability of plastic packaging by 2030 2023 15% 2025 25% 2025 50% 2030 100% 2021-2030 “Efforts and actions taken should be focusing on domestic materials recovery by supplying high quality recyclables post-consumer plastic packaging waste to the recycling sector, to reduce their dependence on importation of plastic wastes from other countries. Therefore, it is more crucial than ever to improve domestic recycling in Malaysia. 37 2023 10% 2025 13% 2030 15% Products and components are to be made from as much recycled content as possible (where technically possible). This supports reducing dependency on virgin (fossil) feedstocks and creates a demand-pull for recycled plastics. It sets a clear direction to stimulate investments in the collection, sorting and recycling industries. It is important that industries with requirements for high-quality materials, such as the packaging industry, maximise the use of recycled content (keeping in mind regulatory constraints, such as food contact and health and safety regulations). Firstly, keeping materials at their highest utility and value at all times maximises the number of possible future use-cycles of the material. Secondly, because if all plastics were to be recycled into lower-quality applications - the ‘high-quality industries’ such as packaging would remain dependent on continuous virgin material input. This target was determined based on the latest commitment from consumer brands on their ability to achieve a certain percentage of recycled content in their packaging, much higher than the 15% average, at about 25-30% at the moment. By taking into consid eration the challenges faced by domestic producers and small-medium enterprises (SMEs) to achieve similar commitment levels to the MNCs, Government has proposed to lower the average recycled content target to 15% to ensure all producers, including domestic producers/brands, are involved in achieving similar goals. 3.4 15% average recycled content by 2030 The Government reserves the right to revise the target based on progress made at annual review points. A dedicated target for each category of material is to be established by a think tank, guided by industry input. 2021-2030 38 The weighted average of the CFR rates of all key resin in Malaysia for 2019 is 24%. This is very low compared to the global rate. For example, the global CFR for PET is between 55% - 57%, while ours is only at 28% - 45%. To ensure continuous supply of feedstocks and unlock maximum potential value from domestic plastic waste, average CFR rate across resin types need to reach 76% by 2030. Increasing collection for recycling is also key to reducing the level of mismanaged plastic waste in Malaysia from its current high level of 63%. A number of interventions must take place to increase the CFR rate to 40% in 2025 and 76% in 2030, as follows: 3.5 76% average collected for-recycling (CFR) rate by 2030 3.6 Post-consumer halal rPET standards by 2022 Increase sorting efficiency of post-consumer collection of plastics; Set recycled content targets across all major end-use applications; Mandate “sustainable design” standards for all plastics application, especially packaging; Encourage increase in recycling capacities (mechanical and chemical) Industry-specific requirements to collect post-use products The halal rPET market is estimated to be worth of USD21.56 billion by 2028. However, current halal standards does not allow for food-contact packaging made from recycled resin. As mentioned in Section 2.4.3, the current development of Halal Consumable Goods - General Requirements (MS2738:2021) will chart the pathway for halal certification of products made from recycled resin focusing on rPET through mechanical recycling. Other key activities and targets are reflected in Figure 6. 2021-2030 2025 40% 2030 76% 39 2021-2030 MALAYSIA PLASTICS SUSTAINABILITY ROADMAP, 2021—2030 Catalysing Sustainability and Circularity towards A New Plastics Economy Identifying problematic SUPs Establishment of Think Tank Establishment of TWG for data sharing platform Inception of Voluntary EPR (2021-2022) MASPA MAREA (2021 - 2023) Adoption of Voluntary EPR (2023 - 2025) Phasing out problematic SUPs (2023-2030) of recycled content for packaging (2025-2026) 2021 2023 2025 Adoption of Voluntary EPRInception of Voluntary EPR PLASTIC BUSTERS Program 01 02 Setting minimum threshold EPR governance framework (2022-2024) CE Data Network Platform (2022-2025) Empowering informal Sector (2022-2026) Mandating sustainable design Improvising plastic recovery management and setting minimum threshold for CFR Increase demand for recycled material (2024-2030) Full implementation of mandatory EPR for packaging Mid-term review 2022 2024 2026 INSPiRE Program Figure 6 40 2021-2030 MALAYSIA PLASTICS SUSTAINABILITY ROADMAP, 2021—2030 Catalysing Sustainability and Circularity towards A New Plastics Economy of recycled content for packaging (2025-2026) Setting minimum threshold of recycled content for automotive (2027-2029) 2025 2027 2029 Start mandatory EPR by 2026 | Full implementation of mandatory EPR for packaging 02 03 R,D&I Funding Market-based instrument and alternative financing Training for SMEs (Module development and training program) Communication, Education and Public Awareness (CEPA & Behavioral Change activities) Circular Economy Award RESOURCES WASTE Full implementation of mandatory EPR for packaging Mandatory waste management plan (divert plastic from landfill) for construction sector (2028-2029) Setting minimum threshold for recycled content for construction Plastic's End-of-Life Vehicle Scheme (Automotive) 2026 2028 2030 41 CHAPTER 4 - ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Government Social Sector Value Chain Players In Malaysia’s plastics value chain, there is a complex mix of actors. For simplicity, the components are mapped against three categories of up-, mid- and downstream activities. Figure 7 presents a high-level overview of aggregated value chains in the plastics industry across sectors, including the key actors across the value chain, the social sector, and the government. In the upstream segment, petrochemical companies and importers make resins available as commodities to converters, while different industries procure and convert specific resins into their semi-manufactured or final products, which are sold domestically or exported abroad. In the midstream, consumers purchase products or services that involve plastics usage via retailers and wholesalers who distribute the goods. In the downstream segment, formal and informal waste management actors link households and businesses to EOL facilities, which range from landfilling to advanced recycling or recovery plants. Furthermore, other stakeholders have cross-cut ting involvement or influence in the plastics value chain. Financial service institutions help finance new business endeavours, academia conducts research regarding circularity solutions, while NGOs’ advocacy and research work typically aims to promote targeted solutions. Understanding these actors’ roles in shaping the value chain is important for allocating the roles and responsibilities as well as as mobilising resources for the implementation of this roadmap Malaysia will only be successful in building a circular economy for plastics in Malaysia if we take a whole-of-nation approach. Brand Owners Wholesalers Scrap importers (recyclers) Recyclers**(including SME,NGO, informal) Incinerators Landfillers Tailgate sorters/ waste pickers/ scavengers* Retailers Plastic Converters Upstream Midstream Downtream Design/Production (intermediary or final product) Import/Production (plastic resin or intermediary products) Usage (incl. distribution) Treatment/Disposal (recycle,dump,incinerate) Collection/Sorting *informal sector Made to order ** including waste-to-fuel facilities Resin Producers Importers Consumers Collectors (waste management, SME,NGO) Aggregators Financial Service Institutions (Commercial banks, venture capital, etc) Academia (universities, research institutes) International Organisations (development agencies, donor organisation, etc) NGOs (advocacy and research group) Ministries (e.g. KASA, KPKT,MITI) Federal Departments/ Central Agencies (e.g. DOE, EPU) State/local Authorities (e.g. Sabah state goverment, DBKL) Figure 7: Overview of key stakeholders across Malaysia’s Plastic Value Chain 2021-2030 42 Table 5 suggests roles and responsibilities of key players for each action plans. Phasing out problematic and unnecessary single-use plastics (SUPs) 5 problematic SUPs phased out Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA leads the research effort with assistance from other ministries/agencies to identify the items and principles or strategies needed. The role of other ministries/agencies will be identified in the study itself. Roles and responsibilities of Government Brand owners and plastics manufacturers lead this initiative through voluntary commitment to phase out and support the plan, and look into other business models to provide alternatives to consumers. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector Environmental NGOs continue to advocate and increase awareness among companies as well as consumers, and share relevant feedback to government based on their engagement/ findings on the ground Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Mandating sustainable design 50% of plastic packaging to be recycled Expected Outcome Action Plan MITI leads and develops the standards that support the sustainable design initiative KASA provides technical advice for the standard development Specific bodies/ agencies (e.g., CIDB, MARII, Automotive Business Development Committee) of the sector as co- lead of the initiative Roles and responsibilities of Government Associations advocate members to adopt the sustainable design standard in their design Industry adopts and implements based on guidance available Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs assist through advocacy, raising awareness and capacity building, and as well outreach efforts Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Implementation of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme for plastics Voluntary EPR scheme adopted (2021 – 2025) Mandatory EPR scheme adopted nationwide by 2026 Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA and KPKT leads the effort to convene on establishing a governance framework for EPR schemes in line with national circular economy policy. This includes setting collection targets and obliged companies. KASA advocates and works on the implementation of EPR for plastics in accordance with the governance framework. MITI provides technical advice on the identification of obliged companies for the mandatory scheme. MEDAC advises and guides SMEs in transitioning to circularity and implement EPR KPDNHEP develops opportunities for distributors network/ businesses in the plastic value chain, and advise on EPR scheme effect on domestic market. KKM advises on the food and product safety Other ministries/agencies advise and assist the implementation of EPR in relevance to their jurisdiction Roles and responsibilities of Government Producer Responsibility Organisation (PRO) represents local and international brand owners active in the Malaysian market will play the key role in advocating EPR, providing input on EPR governance framework and setting up the modulated fees. Trade / industry associations provide stakeholders feedback on the governance framework and EPR implementation. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs provide advocacy, dialogues between government and industry, education and awareness. Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector 2021-2030 43 Improvising plastic recovery and setting minimum CFR rate 40% CFR rate by 2025 76% CFR rate by 2030 Expected Outcome Action Plan KPKT leads with the initiative to develop mechanisms to improve plastic recovery State governments to co-lead the effort and advocate to the concessionaires within the state. KASA assists in setting direction to achieve the target set. MOF advises on the appropriate financial instruments. Roles and responsibilities of Government Waste management companies (i.e., the three concessionaires in Act 672 states and private contractors in others) support the implementation of such waste collection services. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs assist through advocacy, raising awareness and capacity building, and as well outreach efforts Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector N/A Increase demand for recycled material Domestic demand for local recycled material increased Expected Outcome Action Plan Technical Working Group consists of JAKIM, Standards Malaysia KASA, and MOH work on revising current standards. MOH reviews and revises current 1983 Food Act (Act 281) based on current needs MITI provides/promotes incentives scheme for Halal products as to encourage the industry uptake Roles and responsibilities of Government Industry players comply and start incorporating recycled material in the production according to the standard Manufacturing association design CEPA program on Halal certification standards for awareness Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector 2021-2030 44 Alignment between MASPA and MAREA Strengthen public-private collaboration Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA develops collaboration and workplan to synergise both entities Roles and responsibilities of Government MAREA advises and collaborate with KASA. Industry provides inputs to the workplan. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs advises and collaborate with KASA Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Empowering Informal Sector Informal sector mainstreamed Expected Outcome Action Plan KPKT integrates informal sector into the ecosystem KASA integrates participation of informal sectors within plastic circularity efforts MITI provides incentives to recycling industries Roles and responsibilities of Government PRO & Recyclers bridge and encourage involvement of informal sectors through various mechanisms PRO facilitates the responsibility of producers to take back plastic waste from open market by engaging informal sectors to recycle or process and the compliance Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs assist through advocacy, raising awareness and capacity building, and as well outreach efforts to empower informal sector Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Setting minimum threshold of recycled content for packaging 15% recycled content in product by 2025 Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA provides technical input to the implementation Specific bodies/ agencies of the sector as co-lead of the initiative Roles and responsibilities of Government Associations advocate members to incorporate recycled content as feedstock during manufacturing processes Industry set target collectively on the threshold of recycled content in packaging Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector N/A Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector 2021-2030 45 R,D&I funding Local innovation and adoption of circular economy solution increased Expected Outcome Action Plan MOSTI (including MAGIC), MOHE and MTDC to improve access to funding plastics circularity projects/ solutions. Roles and responsibilities of Government Companies across four prioritised sectors apply for R,D&I funding. Private industries to include R,D&I allocation for development of plastic circularity solutions within organisation Start-ups and SMEs (e.g., via the SME Association of Malaysia) that are eligible apply for the fund. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector Research institutions apply for R,D&I funding. Multilateral development institutions and donor organisations provide financial support for the R,D&I scheme. Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Market-based instrument and alternative financing Number of companies adopting circular economy/ plastic sustainability approach increased Expected Outcome Action Plan MOF and MITI lead the effort to finalise the scope, level, and eligibility of the incentives. KASA (including MGTC) leads the update of green procurement criteria to cover products and provides technical advice on material efficiency and refurbishment/ remanufacturing related technologies. Roles and responsibilities of Government Companies provide stakeholder feedback on the scope of the incentives, and green procurement scope and criteria. Financial service institutions facilitate the industry players in financing applications and report on the progress to the government. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs enter strategic collaborations with national and local governments to provide technical guidance to businesses on: i) the conditions for eligibility of incentives and encourage them to adapt their business models to take advantage of the intervention. ii) complying with the government's specifications. Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector CE Data Network Platform Market data available and accessible Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA develops the platform and establish a technical working group (TWG) that consists of experts to work together in defining problems and issues regarding national plastic circularity data. This TWG will be responsible to decide on: i) Type of data including data confidentiality, integrity and sensitivity ii) Sharing platform including open data iii) Harmonised reporting Other ministries mandate their agencies and companies that fall under their jurisdiction to submit the data and share available information Roles and responsibilities of Government Bursa Malaysia mandates reporting of plastic production/ volume put in market and plastic sustainability efforts under its sustainability reporting criteria (for listed companies) Companies contribute information and data Associations contribute and verify information and data Industry representatives become part of TWG and contribute relevant feedback to enhance the implementation of the platform Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs encourage companies to report/ contribute data Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Type of data including data confidentiality, integrity and sensitivity Sharing platform including open data Harmonised reporting 2021-2030 2021-2030 Training for SMEs Number of local SME personnel trained in CE increased Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA and MGTC to develop the training module and programme. MEDAC and SMECORP support the programme by providing the training need analysis and promote it to the SMEs. MITI (MPC) facilitates best practices and productivity among SMEs Roles and responsibilities of Government Industry players participate in the training programme and provide feedback where relevant. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector Relevant NGOs to assist in content development and promotion where relevant Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector PLASTICBUSTERS Program Create awareness among public servants as well as public to prevent unnecessary use of plastics, and practice good plastic management Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA leads the initiative, developing implementation guideline for civil service. Other ministries replicate and implement the program. Roles and responsibilities of Government Business operators in the government premises support the initiative through suitable means, in line with the guidelines provided. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs advocate the importance of plastic circularity and create awareness. Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector INSPiRE Program Create success stories for Malaysia sustainability and circularity initiatives Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA implements the program to nudge industrial behavioural change Roles and responsibilities of Government Interested companies participate in the program as role model /catalyst for a sustainable plastic value chain Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector N/A Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Communication, Education and Public Awareness (CEPA) and Behavioural Change Programmes Improved corporate action and behavioural change Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA and other relevant ministries organise CEPA and behavioural change program Roles and responsibilities of Government Industry players and Association collaborate with government to organise and disseminate relevant information to industry players/ public Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs collaborate with government to organise and disseminate relevant information to industry players/ public Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Circular Economy Award Improved corporate action Expected Outcome Action Plan KASA establishes and organises the award and its criteria SME enhances criteria of related current award schemes to include plastic sustainability. Roles and responsibilities of Government Associations disseminate and encourage its members to qualify for the award. Roles and responsibilities of Private Sector NGOs to assist in developing the criteria and disseminate information about the award. Roles and responsibilities of Civil Sector Table 5: Implementation and resource mobilisation plan 46 5.1.1 National Steering Committee (Joint Steering Committee) 5.1 National Governance for Plastic Circularity With this Plastic Sustainability Roadmap, Malaysia enters a new era of progress towards a circular and sustainable economy for plastics. This Roadmap sets out a robust and clear way forward underpinning our Malaysia’s contribution in tackling the global challenge of plastic pollution. In consultation with industry, civil society and other stakeholders, the Government will ensure that the Roadmap is carried out and the specific actions identified are delivered. Clear governance architectures will be put in place to oversee and steer the implementation of the Roadmap. The implementation of this Roadmap will be reported as one of the key agenda under the National Steering Committee for Roadmap towards Zero Single-Use Plastics, 2018 – 2030. 5.1.2 Technical Committee A technical committee will be established to oversee the overall implementation of this Roadmap. This committee will work together with the dedicated division under KASA. Specific committee(s) may be established to address specific action plans/technical issues. 5.1.3 Think Tank A strategic Think Tank comprising government representatives, industry experts, academia, and civil society organisations will be established. This think tank will look into identifying collective interests and coordinate across different stakeholders to catalyse action towards plastic sustainability, specifically on (but not limited to): CHAPTER 5 - WAY FORWARD 2021-2030 Microplastics issue; Standards harmonisation; Creating sustainable demand for recycled resin; Multi-disciplinary research on plastic (social, economy and environment); and EPR mechanisms. “New plastic economy” definition; Target setting; Market forces; Cost-pass through; 47

Malaysia Plastics Sustainability Roadmap 2021 - 2030 · Nelum