50 CFR § 679.120 - Halibut Deck Sorting

860 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) § 679.120 Shoreside Processor EDR, and Annual Trawl Catcher/Processor EDR forms are available on the NMFS Alaska Re gion Web site at www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov, or by con tacting NMFS at 1–800–304–4846. (d) EDR certification. A person re quired to submit an EDR under para graph (a) of this section, or the des ignated representative, if applicable, must submit the EDR certification statement as either: (1) Part of the entire EDR. A person submitting the applicable EDR form must attest to the accuracy and com pletion of the EDR by signing and dat ing the certification portion of the ap plicable EDR form; or (2) EDR certification only. A person submitting a completed EDR certifi cation only must attest that they meet the conditions exempting them from submitting the entire EDR as described in the certification portion of the ap plicable EDR form and sign and date the certification portion of the form. (e) Verification of EDR data. (1) NMFS, the DCA, or the DDCA will con duct verification of information with a person required to submit the applica ble EDR, or if applicable, that person’s designated representative. (2) The person required to submit the applicable EDR or designated rep resentative, if applicable, must respond to inquiries by NMFS, the designated DCA, or the DDCA within 20 days of the date of issuance of the inquiry. (3) The person required to submit the applicable EDR or designated rep resentative, if applicable, must provide copies of additional data to facilitate data verification. NMFS, the DCA, or the DDCA may review and request cop ies of additional data provided by the person required to submit the applica ble EDR form or designated representa tive, if applicable, including but not limited to, previously audited or re viewed financial statements, work sheets, tax returns, invoices, receipts, and other original documents substan tiating the data submitted in an EDR form. (f) DCA authorization. Except for EDR data submitted as required under § 679.94(a), the DCA is authorized to re lease unaggregated EDR data to au thorized data users in blind data for mat only. [79 FR 71318, Dec. 2, 2014] Subpart K—Halibut Deck Sorting SOURCE: 84 FR 55054, Oct. 15, 2019, unless otherwise noted. § 679.120 Halibut deck sorting. (a) Applicability. The owner and oper ator of a mothership or catcher/proc essor using trawl gear in the non-pol lock groundfish fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska and the Bering Sea and Aleu tian Islands Management Area must comply with the requirements of this section when participating in halibut deck sorting as defined at § 679.2. (b) Catch monitoring requirements—(1) Catch weighing. When halibut deck sorting, all catch, except halibut sorted on deck, must be weighed on a NMFS approved scale in compliance with the scale requirements at § 679.28(b). Each haul must be weighed separately, all catch must be made available for sam pling by a NMFS-certified observer, and no sorting of catch, except halibut sorted on deck, may take place prior to weighing. When halibut deck sorting, no fish may be weighed on a NMFS-ap proved scale used to weigh catch at sea unless two observers are available to complete data collection duties, one on deck and one in the factory. A visual signal, specified in paragraph (e)(8) of this section, must be used to indicate when catch may not be weighed. (2) Observer sampling station. An ob server sampling station meeting the re quirements at § 679.28(d) must be avail able at all times. (3) Observer coverage requirements. Comply with the observer coverage re quirements at § 679.51(a)(2). (4) Sample storage. Provide a storage space sufficient to accommodate a minimum of 10 observer sampling bas kets. This space must be within or ad jacent to the observer sampling sta tion. (5) Vessel crew in tanks or bins. Com ply with the bin monitoring standards at § 679.28(i)(1). VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00870 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 861 Fishery Conservation and Management § 679.120 (6) Observer deck sampling station. An observer deck sampling station meet ing the requirements at § 679.28(d)(9) must be available at all times. (7) Video monitoring. Comply with the video monitoring standards specified at § 679.28(l). (c) Pre-cruise meeting. Notify the Ob server Program by phone at 1 (907) 581– 2060 (Dutch Harbor, AK) or 1 (907) 481– 1770 (Kodiak, AK) at least 24 hours prior to departure when the vessel will be carrying an observer who has not previously been deployed on that vessel within the last 12 months. Subsequent to the vessel’s departure notification, but prior to departure, NMFS may con tact the vessel to arrange for a pre cruise meeting. The pre-cruise meeting must minimally include the vessel op erator or manager and any observers assigned to the vessel. (d) Deck Safety Plan. Annually submit and have an approved Deck Safety Plan prior to participating in halibut deck sorting. The owner and operator must comply with all the requirements de scribed in the NMFS-approved Deck Safety Plan. (1) Deck Safety Plan requirements. A Deck Safety Plan must: (i) Describe the route for observers to safely access and leave the deck sam pling station and specify locations where observers may shelter during gear retrieval and movement. (ii) Describe hazardous areas and po tentially hazardous conditions that could be encountered on deck. (iii) Describe communication proce dures to inform the observer when it is safe to access the deck. These proce dures must identify who will tell the observer it is safe to access the deck, how that communication will happen, and how they will communicate with the observer if a new safety hazard arises while on deck. (iv) List personal protective equip ment that must be worn by the ob server while on deck. (v) List all personnel the observer may contact to report safety issues, in cluding safety hazards identified by the observer that are not covered by the Deck Safety Plan, deviations from the Deck Safety Plan, and any conditions that would require the suspension of halibut deck sorting. (vi) Provide procedures to ensure the observer’s safety while working in the deck sampling station. (vii) Include a scale drawing showing the deck sampling station, the routes to access and exit the deck sampling station, emergency muster location, and safety hazards that could be en countered on deck. (2) Approval. NMFS will approve a Deck Safety Plan if it meets the re quirements specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. The vessel must be inspected by NMFS prior to ap proval of the Deck Safety Plan to en sure that the vessel conforms to the elements addressed in the Deck Safety Plan. NMFS will normally complete its review of the Deck Safety Plan within 14 working days of receiving a com plete Deck Safety Plan and conducting a Deck Safety Plan inspection. If NMFS disapproves a Deck Safety Plan, the vessel owner and operator may re submit a revised Deck Safety Plan or file an administrative appeal as set forth under the administrative appeals procedures set out at 15 CFR part 906. (3) Deck Safety Plan inspection. The vessel owner and operator must submit a complete Deck Safety Plan to NMFS by fax (206–526–4066) or email (station.inspections@noaa.gov) at least 10 working days in advance of the re quested date of inspection. (4) Location. Deck Safety Plan inspec tions will be conducted on vessels tied up at docks in Kodiak, Alaska, Dutch Harbor, Alaska, and in the Puget Sound area of Washington State. (5) Changes to the Deck Safety Plan. The vessel owner and operator may propose a change to the Deck Safety Plan by submitting a Deck Safety Plan addendum to NMFS. NMFS may re quire a Deck Safety Plan inspection described at paragraph (d)(3) of this section before approving the adden dum. (e) Vessel operator responsibilities. The operator of a vessel subject to this sec tion must comply with the following: (1) Deck sorting safety meeting. Provide the observer with a copy of the NMFS approved Deck Safety Plan and make available all other applicable inspec tion reports described at § 679.28. The deck sorting safety meeting must be conducted prior to departing port and VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00871 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 862 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) § 679.121 must include the observer, vessel oper ator, and key crew member who will be responsible for providing notification or reasonable assistance during halibut deck sorting. All elements of the ves sel’s Deck Safety Plan must be re viewed with the observer during this meeting. (2) Observer notification. Before hal ibut deck sorting, notify the observer at least 15 minutes prior to bringing fish on board. (3) Observer present. Conduct halibut deck sorting only when an observer is present in the deck sampling station. (4) Time limit. Conduct halibut deck sorting only within the time limit indi cated on the Observer Sampling Sta tion Inspection Report. The time limit begins when the codend is opened on deck. When the time limit is reached, all halibut deck sorting must stop. (5) Single sorting pathway. Convey all halibut sorted on deck to the observer deck sampling station via a single pathway. (6) Careful handling. Handle all hal ibut sorted on deck with a minimum of injury. (7) Sorting pace. Do not pressure or rush the observer to move halibut through the sampling process faster than the observer can handle. (8) Visual signal. Use a visual signal to indicate to vessel crew when catch may not to be weighed on a NMFS-ap proved scale specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The visual signal must be on the conveyor belt adjacent to the flow scale and visible in the view of a camera required at § 679.28(b)(8). § 679.121 [Reserved] APPENDIX A TO PART 679—PERFORM ANCE AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SCALES USED TO WEIGH CATCH AT SEA IN THE GROUNDFISH FISH ERIES OFF ALASKA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Belt Scales 2.1 Applicability 2.2 Performance Requirements 2.2.1 Maximum Permissible Errors 2.2.1.1 Laboratory Tests 2.2.1.2 Zero Load Tests 2.2.1.3 Material Tests 2.2.2 Minimum Flow Rate (Smin) 2.2.3 Minimum Totalized Load (Smin) 2.2.4 Influence Quantities 2.2.4.1 Temperature 2.2.4.2 Power Supply 2.3 Technical Requirements 2.3.1 Indicators and Printers 2.3.1.1 General 2.3.1.2 Values Defined 2.3.1.3 Units 2.3.1.4 Value of the Scale Division 2.3.1.5 Range of Indication 2.3.1.6 Resettable and Non-resettable Val ues 2.3.1.7 Rate of Flow Indicator 2.3.1.8 Printed Information 2.3.1.9 Permanence of Markings 2.3.1.10 Power Loss 2.3.1.11 Adjustable Components 2.3.1.12 Audit Trail 2.3.1.13 Adjustments to Scale Weights 2.3.2 Weighing Elements 2.3.2.1 Speed Measurement 2.3.2.2 Conveyer Belt 2.3.2.3 Overload Protection 2.3.2.4 Speed Control 2.3.2.5 Adjustable Components 2.3.2.6 Motion Compensation 2.3.3 Installation Conditions 2.3.4 Marking 2.3.4.1 Presentation 2.4 Tests 2.4.1 Minimum Test Load 2.4.2 Laboratory Tests 2.4.2.1 Influence Quantity and Disturb ance Tests 2.4.2.2 Zero-Load Tests 2.4.2.3 Material Tests 2.4.3 Annual Scale Inspections 2.4.3.1 Zero-Load Tests 2.4.3.2 Material Tests 3. Automatic Hopper Scales 3.1 Applicability 3.2 Performance Requirements 3.2.1 Maximum Permissible Errors 3.2.1.1 Laboratory Tests 3.2.1.2 Increasing and Decreasing Load Tests 3.2.2 Minimum Weighment (Smin) 3.2.3 Minimum Totalized Load (Lot) 3.2.4 Influence Quantities 3.2.4.1 Temperature 3.2.4.1.1 Operating Temperature 3.2.4.2 Power Supply 3.3 Technical Requirements 3.3.1 Indicators and Printers 3.3.1.1 General 3.3.1.2 Values Defined 3.3.1.3 Units 3.3.1.4 Value of the Scale Division 3.3.1.5 Weighing Sequence 3.3.1.6 Printing Sequence 3.3.1.7 Printed Information 3.3.1.8 Permanence of Markings 3.3.1.9 Range of Indication 3.3.1.10 Non-resettable Values VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00872 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 863 Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, App. A 3.3.1.11 Power Loss 3.3.1.12 Adjustable Components 3.3.1.13 Audit Trail 3.3.1.14 Zero-Load Adjustment 3.3.1.14.1 Manual 3.3.1.14.2 Semi-automatic 3.3.1.15 Damping Means 3.3.1.16 Adjustments to Scale Weights 3.3.2 Interlocks and Gate Control 3.3.3 Overfill Sensor 3.3.4 Weighing Elements 3.3.4.1 Overload Protection 3.3.4.2 Adjustable Components 3.3.4.3 Motion Compensation 3.3.5 Installation Conditions 3.3.6 Marking 3.3.6.1 Presentation 3.4 Tests 3.4.1 Standards 3.4.2 Laboratory Tests 3.4.2.1 Influence Quantity and Disturb ance Tests 3.4.2.2 Performance Tests 3.4.3 Annual Scale Inspections 4. Platform Scales and Hanging Scales 4.1 Applicability 4.2 Performance Requirements 4.2.1 Maximum Permissible Errors 4.2.1.1 Laboratory Tests 4.2.1.2 Increasing and Decreasing Load and Shift Tests 4.2.2 Accuracy Classes 4.2.3 Minimum Load 4.2.4 Influence Quantities 4.2.4.1 Temperature 4.2.4.1.1 Operating Temperature 4.2.4.2 Power Supply 4.3 Technical Requirements 4.3.1 Indicators and Printers 4.3.1.1 General 4.3.1.2 Values Defined 4.3.1.3 Units 4.3.1.4 Value of the Scale Division 4.3.1.5 Printed Information 4.3.1.6 Permanence of Markings 4.3.1.7 Power Loss 4.3.1.8 Adjustable Components 4.3.1.9 Zero-Load Adjustment 4.3.1.9.1 Manual 4.3.1.9.2 Semi-automatic 4.3.1.10 Damping Means 4.3.2 Weighing Elements 4.3.2.1 Overload Protection 4.3.2.2 Adjustable Components 4.3.2.3 Motion Compensation 4.3.3 Installation Conditions 4.3.4 Marking 4.3.4.1 Presentation 4.4 Tests 4.4.1 Standards 4.4.2 Laboratory Tests 4.4.2.1 Influence Quantities and Disturb ance Tests 4.4.2.2 Performance Tests 4.4.3 Annual Scale Inspections 5. Definitions ANNEX A OF APPENDIX A TO PART 679— INFLUENCE QUANTITY AND DISTURBANCE TESTS A.1 General A.2 Test considerations A.3 Tests A.3.1 Static Temperatures A.3.2 Damp Heat, Steady State A.3.3 Power Voltage Variation A.3.4 Short Time Power Reduction A.3.5 Bursts A.3.6 Electrostatic Discharge A.3.7 Electromagnetic Susceptibility A.4 Bibliography 1. Introduction (a) This appendix to part 679 contains the performance and technical requirements for scales to be approved by NMFS for use to weigh, at sea, catch from the groundfish fish eries off Alaska. The performance and tech nical requirements in this document have not been reviewed or endorsed by the Na tional Conference on Weights and Measures. Regulations implementing the requirements of this appendix and additional requirements for and with respect to scales used to weigh catch at sea are found at 50 CFR 679.28(b). (b) Revisions, amendments, or additions to this appendix may be made after notice and opportunity for public comments. Send re quests for revisions, amendments, or addi tions to the Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Ju neau, AK 99802. (c) Types of Scales Covered by Appendix— This appendix contains performance and technical requirements for belt, automatic hopper, platform, and hanging scales. (d) Testing and Approval of Scales Used to Weigh Catch at Sea—Scales used to weigh catch at sea are required to comply with four categories of performance and technical re quirements: (1) Type evaluation; (2) initial inspection after installation while the vessel is tied up at a dock and is not under power at sea; (3) annual reinspection while the ves sel is tied up at a dock and is not under power at sea; and (4) daily at-sea tests of the scale’s accuracy. This appendix contains only the performance and technical require ments for type evaluation and initial and an nual reinspections by an authorized scale in spector. 2. Belt Scales 2.1 Applicability. The requirements in this section apply to a scale or scale system that employs a conveyor belt in contact with a weighing element to determine the weight of a bulk commodity being conveyed across the scale. 2.2 Performance Requirements—2.2.1 Max imum Permissible Errors. For laboratory tests of a scale and initial inspections and annual reinspections of an installed scale when the vessel is tied up at a dock and is not under VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00873 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 864 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) Pt. 679, App. A power at sea, the following maximum per missible errors (MPEs) are specified: 2.2.1.1 Laboratory Tests. See annex A to this appendix A for procedures for disturb ance tests and influence factors. a. Disturbances. ±0.18 percent of the weight of the load totalized. b. Influence Factors. ±0.25 percent of the weight of the load totalized. c. Temperature Effect at Zero Flow Rate. The difference between the values obtained at zero flow rate taken at temperatures that differ by 10 °C ±0.2 °C must not be greater than 0.035 percent of the weight of the load totalized at the maximum flow-rate for the time of the test. 2.2.1.2 Zero Load Tests. For zero load tests conducted in a laboratory or on a scale in stalled on a vessel and conducted when the vessel is tied up at a dock and not under power at sea, ±0.1 percent of the value of the minimum totalized load or 1 scale division (d), whichever is greater. 2.2.1.3 Material Tests. For material tests conducted in a laboratory or on a scale in stalled on a vessel and conducted when the vessel is tied up at a dock and not under power at sea, ±1.0 percent of the known weight of the test material. 2.2.2 Minimum Flow Rate (Qmin). The min imum flow rate must be specified by the manufacturer and must not be greater than 35 percent of the rated capacity of the scale in kilograms per hour (kg/hr) or metric tons per hour (mt/hr). 2.2.3 Minimum Totalized Load (Smin). The minimum totalized load must not be less than the greater of— a. Two percent of the load totalized in 1 hour at the maximum flow rate; b. The load obtained at the maximum flow rate in 1 revolution of the belt; or c. A load equal to 800 scale divisions (d). 2.2.4 Influence Quantities. The following requirements apply to influence factor tests conducted in the laboratory. 2.2.4.1 Temperature. A belt scale must comply with the performance and technical requirements at a range of temperatures from ¥10 °C to + 40 °C. However, for special applications the temperature range may be different, but the range must not be less than 30 °C and must be so specified on the scale’s descriptive markings. 2.2.4.2 Power Supply. A belt scale must comply with the performance and technical requirements when operated within a range of ¥15 percent to + 10 percent of the power supply specified on the scale’s descriptive markings. 2.3.1 Technical Requirements. 2.3.1 Indicators and Printers. 2.3.1.1 General. A belt scale must be equipped with an indicator capable of dis playing both the weight of fish in each haul or set and the cumulative weight of all fish or other material weighed on the scale be tween annual inspections (‘‘the cumulative weight’’), a rate of flow indicator, and a printer. The indications and printed rep resentations must be clear, definite, accu rate, and easily read under all conditions of normal operation of the belt scale. 2.3.1.2 Values Defined. If indications or printed representations are intended to have specific values, these must be defined by a sufficient number of figures, words, or sym bols, uniformly placed with reference to the indications or printed representations and as close as practicable to the indications or printed representations but not so positioned as to interfere with the accuracy of reading. 2.3.1.3 Units. The weight of each haul or set must be indicated in kilograms, and the cumulative weight must be indicated in ei ther kilograms or metric tons and decimal subdivisions. 2.3.1.4 Value of the Scale Division. The value of the scale division (d) expressed in a unit of weight must be equal to 1, 2, or 5, or a decimal multiple or sub-multiple of 1, 2, or 5. 2.3.1.5 Range of Indication. The range of the weight indications and printed values for each haul or set must be from 0 kg to 999,999 kg and for the cumulative weight must be from 0 to 99,999 metric tons. 2.3.1.6 Resettable and Non-resettable Values. The means to indicate the weight of fish in each haul or set must be resettable to zero. The means to indicate the cumulative weight must not be resettable to zero with out breaking a security means and must be reset only upon direction of NMFS or an au thorized scale inspector. 2.3.1.7 Rate of Flow Indicator. Permanent means must be provided to produce an audio or visual signal when the rate of flow is less than the minimum flow rate or greater than 98 percent of the maximum flow rate. 2.3.1.8 Printed Information. The informa tion printed must include— a. For catch weight: i. The vessel name; ii. The Federal fisheries or processor per mit number of the vessel; iii. The haul or set number; iv. The total weight of catch in each haul or set; v. The total cumulative weight of all fish or other material weighed on the scale; and vi. The date and time the information is printed. b. For the audit trail: i. The vessel name; ii. The Federal fisheries or processor per mit number of the vessel; iii. The date and time (to the nearest minute) that the adjustment was made; iv. The name or type of adjustment being made; and v. The initial and final values of the pa rameter being changed. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00874 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 865 Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, App. A 2.3.1.9 Permanence of Markings. All re quired indications, markings, and instruc tions must be distinct and easily readable and must be of such character that they will not tend to become obliterated or illegible. 2.3.1.10 Power Loss. In the event of a power failure, means must be provided to retain in a memory the weight of fish in each haul or set for which a printed record has not yet been made, the cumulative weight, and the information on the audit trail. 2.3.1.11 Adjustable Components. An adjust able component that when adjusted affects the performance or accuracy of the scale must be held securely in position and must not be capable of adjustment without break ing a security means unless a record of the adjustment is made on the audit trail de scribed in 2.3.1.12. 2.3.1.12 Audit Trail. An audit trail in the form of an event logger must be provided to document changes made using adjustable components. The following information must be provided in an electronic form that can not be changed or erased by the scale oper ator, can be printed at any time, and can be cleared by the scale manufacturer’s rep resentative upon direction by NMFS or by an authorized scale inspector: a. The date and time (to the nearest minute) of the change; b. The name or type of adjustment being made; and c. The initial and final values of the pa rameter being changed. 2.3.1.13 Adjustments to Scale Weights. The indicators and printer must be designed so that the scale operator cannot change or ad just the indicated and printed weight values. 2.3.2 Weighing Elements. 2.3.2.1 Speed Measurement. A belt scale must be equipped with means to accurately sense the belt travel and/or speed whether the belt is loaded or empty. 2.3.2.2 Conveyer Belt. The weight per unit length of the conveyor belt must be prac tically constant. Belt joints must be such that there are no significant effects on the weighing results. 2.3.2.3 Overload Protection. The load re ceiver must be equipped with means so that an overload of 150 percent or more of the ca pacity does not affect the metrological char acteristics of the scale. 2.3.2.4 Speed Control. The speed of the belt must not vary by more than 5 percent of the nominal speed. 2.3.2.5 Adjustable Components. An adjust able component that can affect the perform ance of the belt scale must be held securely in position and must not be capable of ad justment without breaking a security means. 2.3.2.6 Motion Compensation. A belt scale must be equipped with automatic means to compensate for the motion of a vessel at sea so that the weight values indicated are with in the MPEs. Such means shall be a ref erence load cell and a reference mass weight or other equally effective means. When equivalent means are utilized, the manufac turer must provide NMFS with information demonstrating that the scale can weigh ac curately at sea. 2.3.3 Installation Conditions. A belt scale must be rigidly installed in a level condition. 2.3.4 Marking. A belt scale must be marked with the— a. Name, initials, or trademark of the man ufacturer or distributer; b. Model designation; c. Non-repetitive serial number; d. Maximum flow rate (Qmax); e. Minimum flow rate (Qmin); f. Minimum totalized load (Smin); g. Value of a scale division (d); h. Belt speed; i. Weigh length; j. Maximum capacity (Max); k. Temperature range (if applicable); and l. Mains voltage. 2.3.4.1 Presentation. The markings must be reasonably permanent and of such size, shape, and clarity to provide easy reading in normal conditions of use. They must be grouped together in a place visible to the op erator. 2.4 Tests. 2.4.1 Minimum Test Load. The minimum test load must be the greater of— a. 2 percent of the load totalized in 1 hour at the maximum flow rate; b. The load obtained at maximum flow rate in one revolution of the belt; or c. A load equal to 800 scale divisions. 2.4.2 Laboratory Tests. 2.4.2.1 Influence Quantity and Disturbance Tests. Tests must be conducted according to annex A and the results of these tests must be within the values specified in section 2.2.1.1. 2.4.2.2 Zero-Load Tests. A zero-load test must be conducted for a time equal to that required to deliver the minimum totalized load (‘‘min). At least two zero-load tests must be conducted prior to a material test. The results of these tests must be within the values specified in section 2.2.1.2. 2.4.2.3 Material Tests. At least one mate rial test must be conducted with the weight of the material or simulated material equal to or greater than the minimum test load. The results of these tests must be within the values specified in section 2.2.1.3. 2.4.3 Annual Inspections. 2.4.3.1 Zero-Load Tests. A zero-load test must be conducted for a time equal to that required to deliver the minimum totalized load (Smin). At least one zero-load test must be conducted prior to each material test. The results of this test must be within the values specified in section 2.2.1.2. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00875 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 866 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) Pt. 679, App. A 2.4.3.2 Material Tests. At least one mate rial or simulated material test must be con ducted with the weight of the material or simulated material equal to or greater than the minimum test load. The results of these tests must be within the values specified in section 2.2.1.3. 3. Automatic Hopper Scales 3.1 Applicability. The requirements in this section apply to a scale or scale system that is designed for automatic weighing of a bulk commodity in predetermined amounts. 3.2 Performance Requirements. 3.2.1 Maximum Permissible Errors. For lab oratory tests of a scale and initial inspection and annual reinspections of an installed scale when the vessel is tied up at a dock and is not under power at sea, the following MPEs are specified: 3.2.1.1 Laboratory Tests. See annex A to ap pendix A for procedures for disturbance test and influence factors. a. Disturbances. Significant fault (sf) (±scale division). b. Influence Factors. ±1 percent of test load. 3.2.1.2 Increasing and Decreasing Load Tests. For increasing and decreasing load tests conducted in a laboratory or on a scale installed on a vessel tied up at a dock and not under power at sea, ±1.0 percent of the test load. 3.2.2 Minimum Weighment (Smin). The min imum weighment must not be less than 20 percent of the weighing capacity, or a load equal to 100 scale intervals (d), except for the final weighment of a lot. 3.2.3 Minimum Totalized Load (Lot). The minimum totalized load must not be less than 4 weighments. 3.2.4 Influence Quantities. The following requirements apply to influence factor tests conducted in the laboratory: 3.2.4.1 Temperature. A hopper scale must comply with the metrological and technical requirements at temperatures from ¥10 °C to + 40 °C. However, for special applications the temperature range may be different, but the range must not be less than 30 °C and must be so specified on the scale’s descriptive markings. 3.2.4.1.1 Operating Temperature. A hopper scale must not display or print any usable weight values until the operating tempera ture necessary for accurate weighing and a stable zero-balance condition have been at tained. 3.2.4.2 Power Supply. A hopper scale must comply with the performance and technical requirements when operated within ¥15 per cent to + 10 percent of the power supply spec ified on the scale’s descriptive markings. 3.3 Technical Requirements. 3.3.1 Indicators and Printers. 3.3.1.1 General. a. A hopper scale must be equipped with an indicator and printer that indicates and prints the weight of each load and a no-load reference value; and a printer that prints the total weight of fish in each haul or set and the total cumulative weight of all fish and other material weighed on the scale between annual inspections (‘‘the cu mulative weight’’). The indications and printed information must be clear, definite, accurate, and easily read under all condi tions of normal operation of the hopper scale. b. A no-load reference value may be a posi tive or negative value in terms of scale divi sions or zero. When the no-load reference value is zero, the scale must return to a zero indication (within ±0.5 scale division) when the load receptor (hopper) is empty following the discharge of all loads, without the inter vention of either automatic or manual means. 3.3.1.2 Values Defined. If indications or printed representations are intended to have specific values, these must be defined by a sufficient number of figures, words, or sym bols, uniformly placed with reference to the indications or printed representations and as close as practicable to the indications or printed representations but not so positioned as to interfere with the accuracy of reading. 3.3.1.3 Units. The weight of each haul or set must be indicated in kilograms, and the cumulative weight must be indicated in ei ther kilograms or metric tons and decimal subdivisions. 3.3.1.4 Value of the Scale Division. The value of the scale division (d) expressed in a unit of weight must be equal to 1, 2, or 5, or a decimal multiple or sub-multiple of 1, 2, or 5. 3.3.1.5 Weighing Sequence. For hopper scales used to receive (weigh in), the no-load reference value must be determined and printed only at the beginning of each weigh ing cycle. For hopper scales used to deliver (weigh out), the no-load reference value must be determined and printed only after the gross-load weight value for each weighing cycle has been indicated and printed. 3.3.1.6 Printing Sequence. Provision must be made so that all weight values are indi cated until the completion of the printing of the indicated values. 3.3.1.7 Printed Information. The informa tion printed must include— a. For catch weight: i. The vessel name; ii. The Federal fisheries or processor per mit number of the vessel; iii. The haul or set number; iv. The total weight of catch in each haul or set; v. The total cumulative weight of all fish or other material weighed on the scale; and vi. The date and time the information is printed. b. For the audit trail: i. The vessel name; VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00876 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 867 Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, App. A ii. The Federal fisheries or processor per mit number of the vessel; iii. The date and time (to the nearest minute) of the change; iv. The name or type of adjustment being made; and v. The initial and final values of the pa rameter being changed. 3.3.1.8 Permanence of Markings. All re quired indications, markings, and instruc tions must be distinct and easily readable and must be of such character that they will not tend to become obliterated or illegible. 3.3.1.9 Range of Indication. The range of the weight indications and printed values for each haul or set must be from 0 kg to 999,999 kg and for the cumulative weight must be from 0 to 99,999 metric tons. 3.3.1.10 Non-Resettable Values. The cumu lative weight must not be resettable to zero without breaking a security means and must be reset only upon direction by NMFS or by an authorized scale inspector. 3.3.1.11 Power Loss. In the event of a power failure, means must be provided to retain in a memory the weight of fish in each haul or set for which a printed record has not yet been made, the cumulative weight, and the information on the audit trail described in 3.3.1.13. 3.3.1.12 Adjustable Components. An adjust able component that, when adjusted, affects the performance or accuracy of the scale must not be capable of adjustment without breaking a security means, unless a record of the adjustment is made on the audit trail de scribed in 3.3.1.13. 3.3.1.13 Audit Trail. An audit trail in the form of an event logger must be provided to document changes made using adjustable components. The following information must be provided in an electronic form that can not be changed or erased by the scale oper ator, can be printed at any time, and can be cleared by the scale manufacturer’s rep resentative upon direction of NMFS or by an authorized scale inspector: a. The date and time (to the nearest minute) of the change; b. The name or type of adjustment being made; and c. The initial and final values of the pa rameter being changed. 3.3.1.14 Zero-Load Adjustment. A hopper scale must be equipped with a manual or semi-automatic means that can be used to adjust the zero-load balance or no-load ref erence value. 3.3.1.14.1 Manual. A manual means must be operable or accessible only by a tool out side of, or entirely separate from, this mech anism or enclosed in a cabinet. 3.3.1.14.2 Semi-Automatic. A semi-auto matic means must be operable only when the indication is stable within ±1 scale division and cannot be operated during a weighing cycle (operation). 3.3.1.15 Damping Means. A hopper scale must be equipped with effective automatic means to bring the indications quickly to a readable stable equilibrium. Effective auto matic means must also be provided to permit the recording of weight values only when the indication is stable within plus or minus one scale division. 3.3.1.16 Adjustments to Scale Weights. The indicators and printer must be designed so that the scale operator cannot change or ad just the indicated and printed weight values. 3.3.2 Interlocks and Gate Control. A hopper scale must have operating interlocks so that— a. Product cannot be weighed if the printer is disconnected or subject to a power loss; b. The printer cannot print a weight if ei ther of the gates leading to or from the weigh hopper is open; c. The low paper sensor of the printer is ac tivated; d. The system will operate only in the se quence intended; and e. If the overfill sensor is activated, this condition is indicated to the operator and is printed. 3.3.3 Overfill Sensor. The weigh hopper must be equipped with an overfill sensor that will cause the feed gate to close, activate an alarm, and stop the weighing operation until the overfill condition has been corrected. 3.3.4 Weighing Elements. 3.3.4.1 Overload Protection. The weigh hop per must be equipped with means so that an overload of 150 percent or more of the capac ity of the hopper does not affect the metrological characteristics of the scale. 3.3.4.2 Adjustable Components. An adjust able component that can affect the perform ance of the hopper scale must be held se curely in position and must not be capable of adjustment without breaking a security means. 3.3.4.3 Motion Compensation. A hopper scale must be equipped with automatic means to compensate for the motion of a vessel at sea so that the weight values indi cated are within the MPEs. Such means shall be a reference load cell and a reference mass weight or other equally effective means. When equivalent means are utilized, the manufacturer must provide NMFS with in formation demonstrating that the scale can weigh accurately at sea. 3.3.5 Installation Conditions. A hopper scale must be rigidly installed in a level condition. 3.3.6 Marking. A hopper scale must be marked with the following: a. Name, initials, or trademark of the man ufacturer or distributer; b. Model designation; c. Non-repetitive serial number; d. Maximum capacity (Max); e. Minimum capacity (min); f. Minimum totalized load (Smin); g. Minimum weighment; VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00877 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 868 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) Pt. 679, App. A h. Value of the scale division (d); i. Temperature range (if applicable); and j. Mains voltage. 3.3.6.1 Presentation. Descriptive markings must be reasonably permanent and grouped together in a place visible to the operator. 3.4 Tests. 3.4.1 Standards. The error of the standards used must not exceed 25 percent of the MPE to be applied. 3.4.2 Laboratory Tests. 3.4.2.1 Influence Quantity and Disturbance Tests. Tests must be conducted according to annex A and the results of these tests must be within the values specified in section 3.2.1.1. 3.4.2.2 Performance Tests. Performance tests must be conducted as follows: a. Increasing load test. At least five increas ing load tests must be conducted with test loads at the minimum load, at a load near capacity, and at 2 or more critical points in between; and b. Decreasing load test. A decreasing load test must be conducted with a test load ap proximately equal to one-half capacity when removing the test loads of an increasing load test. 3.4.3 Annual Inspections. At least two increasing load tests and two decreasing load tests must be conducted as specified in 3.4.2.2. Additionally, tests must be conducted with test loads approximately equal to the weight of loads at which the scale is normally used. 4. Platform Scales and Hanging Scales 4.1 Applicability. The requirements in this section apply to platform and hanging scales used to weigh total catch. Platform scales used only as observer sampling scales or to determine the known weight of fish for a ma terial test of another scale are not required to have a printer under sections 4.3.1 and 4.3.1.5 or an audit trail under section 4.3.1.8. 4.2 Performance Requirements. 4.2.1 Maximum Permissible Errors. For lab oratory tests of a scale and initial inspection and annual reinspections of an installed scale while the vessel is tied up at a dock and is not under power at sea, the following MPEs are specified: 4.2.1.1 Laboratory Tests. See annex A to this appendix A for procedures for disturb ance tests and influence factors. a. Disturbances. Significant fault (±1 scale division); and b. Influence Factors. See Table 1 in section 4.2.1.2. 4.2.1.2 Increasing and Decreasing Load and Shift Tests. Increasing and decreasing load and shift tests conducted in a laboratory or on a scale installed on a vessel while the ves sel is tied up at a dock and is not under power at sea, see Table 1 as follows: TABLE 1—INFLUENCE FACTORS Test load in scale divisions (d) Maximum permis sible error (d) Class III 1 Class IIII 0 <m2 ≤500 .......................... 0 <m ≤50 ............. 0.5 500 <m ≤2000 ..................... 50 <m ≤200 ......... 1.0 2000 <m .............................. 200 <m ................ 1.5 1 Scale accuracy classes are defined in section 4.2.2, table 2. 2 Mass or weight of the test load in scale divisions. 4.2.2 Accuracy Classes. Scales are divided into two accuracy classes, class III and class IIII. The accuracy class of a scale is des ignated by the manufacturer. The design of each accuracy class with respect to number of scale divisions (n) and the value of the scale division (d) is specified according to table 2: TABLE 2—ACCURACY CLASSES Accuracy class Value of scale division (d) Number of scale divi sions (n) Minimum Maximum III ............... 5 g or greater 500 10,000 IIII .............. 5 g or greater 100 1,000 4.2.3 Minimum Load: For a Class III scale, 20d; for a Class IIII scale, 10d. 4.2.4 Influence Quantities. The following requirements apply to influence factor tests conducted in the laboratory. 4.2.4.1 Temperature. A scale must comply with the performance and technical require ments at temperatures from ¥10 °C to + 40 °C. However, for special applications the temperature range may be different, but the range must not be less than 30 °C and must be so specified on the descriptive markings. 4.2.4.1.1 Operating Temperature. A scale must not display or print any usable weight values until the operating temperature nec essary for accurate weighing and a stable zero-balance condition have been attained. 4.2.4.2 Power Supply. A scale must comply with the performance and technical require ments when operated within ¥15 percent to + 10 percent of the power supply specified on the scale’s descriptive markings. 4.3 Technical Requirements. 4.3.1 Indicators and Printers. 4.3.1.1 General. A scale must be equipped with an indicator and a printer. The indica tions and printed information must be clear, definite, accurate, and easily read under all conditions of normal operation of the scale. 4.3.1.2 Values Defined. If indications or printed representations are intended to have specific values, these must be defined by a sufficient number of figures, words, or sym bols, uniformly placed with reference to the indications or printed representations and as close as practicable to the indications or VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00878 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 869 Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, App. A printed representations but not so positioned as to interfere with the accuracy of reading. 4.3.1.3 Units. The weight units indicated must be in terms of kilograms and decimal subdivisions. 4.3.1.4 Value of the Scale Division. The value of the scale division (d) expressed in a unit of weight must be equal to 1, 2, or 5, or a decimal multiple or sub-multiple of 1, 2, or 5. 4.3.1.5 Printed Information. The informa tion printed must include— a. For catch weight: i. The vessel name; ii. The Federal fisheries or processor per mit number of the vessel; iii. The haul or set number; iv. Net weight of the fish. b. For the audit trail: i. The vessel name; ii. The Federal fisheries or processor per mit number of the vessel; iii. The date and time (to the nearest minute) of the change; iv. The name or type of adjustment being made; and v. The initial and final values of the pa rameter being changed. 4.3.1.6 Permanence of Markings. All re quired indications, markings, and instruc tions must be distinct and easily readable and must be of such character that they will not tend to become obliterated or illegible. 4.3.1.7 Power Loss. In the event of a power failure, means must be provided to retain in a memory the weight of the last weighment if it is a non-repeatable weighment. 4.3.1.8 Adjustable Components. a. An adjustable component that, when ad justed, affects the performance or accuracy of the scale must be held securely in position and must not be capable of adjustment with out breaking a security means. b. An audit trail in the form of an event logger must be provided to document changes made using adjustable components. The following information must be provided in an electronic form that cannot be changed or erased by the scale operator, can be print ed at any time, and can be cleared by the scale manufacturer’s representative upon di rection of NMFS or an authorized scale in spector: i. The date and time (to the nearest minute) of the change; ii. The name or type of adjustment being made; and iii. The initial and final values of the pa rameter being changed. 4.3.1.9 Zero-Load Adjustment. A scale must be equipped with a manual or semi-auto matic means that can be used to adjust the zero-load balance or no-load reference value. 4.3.1.9.1 Manual. A manual means must be operable or accessible only by a tool outside of or entirely separate from this mechanism or enclosed in a cabinet. 4.3.1.9.2 Semi-automatic. A semi-automatic means must meet the provisions of 4.3.1.8 or must be operable only when the indication is stable within ±1 scale division and cannot be operated during a weighing cycle (oper ation). 4.3.1.10 Damping Means. A scale must be equipped with effective automatic means to bring the indications quickly to a readable stable equilibrium. Effective automatic means must also be provided to permit the recording of weight values only when the in dication is stable within plus or minus one scale division. 4.3.2 Weighing Elements. 4.3.2.1 Overload Protection. The scale must be so designed that an overload of 150 per cent or more of the capacity does not affect the metrological characteristics of the scale. 4.3.2.2 Adjustable Components. An adjust able component that can affect the perform ance of the scale must be held securely in po sition and must not be capable of adjustment without breaking a security means. 4.3.2.3 Motion Compensation. A platform scale must be equipped with automatic means to compensate for the motion of a vessel at sea so that the weight values indi cated are within the MPEs. Such means shall be a reference load cell and a reference mass weight or other equally effective means. When equivalent means are utilized, the manufacturer must provide NMFS with in formation demonstrating that the scale can weigh accurately at sea. 4.3.3 Installation Conditions. A platform scale must be rigidly installed in a level con dition. When in use, a hanging scale must be freely suspended from a fixed support or a crane. 4.3.4 Marking. A scale must be marked with the following: a. Name, initials, or trademark of the man ufacturer or distributor; b. Model designation; c. Non-repetitive serial number; d. Accuracy class (III or IIII); e. Maximum capacity (Max); f. Minimum capacity (min); g. Value of a scale division (d); h. Temperature range (if applicable); and i. Mains voltage. 4.3.4.1 Presentation. Descriptive markings must be reasonably permanent and grouped together in a place visible to the operator. 4.4 Tests. 4.4.1 Standards. The error of the standards used must not exceed 25 percent of the MPE applied. 4.4.2 Laboratory Tests. 4.4.2.1 Influence Quantities and Disturbance Tests. Tests must be conducted according to annex A to this appendix A, and the results of these tests must be within the values specified in section 4.2.1.1. 4.4.2.2 Performance Tests. Performance tests must be conducted as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00879 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 870 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) Pt. 679, App. A a. Increasing load test. At least five increas ing load tests must be conducted with test loads at the minimum load, at a load near capacity, and at 2 or more critical points in between. b. Shift test (platform scales only). A shift test must be conducted during the increasing load test at one-third capacity test load cen tered in each quadrant of the platform. c. Decreasing load test. A decreasing load test must be conducted with a test load ap proximately equal to one-half capacity when removing the test loads of an increasing load test. 4.4.3 Annual Scale Inspections. At least two increasing load tests, shift tests, and decreasing load tests must be con ducted as specified in section 4.4.2.2. Addi tionally tests must be conducted with test loads approximately equal to the weight of loads at which the scale is normally used. The results of all tests must be as specified in Table 1 in section 4.2.1.2. 5. Definitions Adjustable component—Any component that, when adjusted, affects the performance or accuracy of the scale, e.g., span adjust ment or automatic zero-setting means. Man ual or semi-automatic zero-setting means are not considered adjustable components. Audit trail—An electronic count and/or in formation record of the changes to the val ues of the calibration or configuration pa rameters of a scale. Automatic hopper scale—A hopper scale adapted to the automatic weighing of a bulk commodity (fish) in predetermined amounts. Capacities vary from 20 kg to 50 mt. It is generally equipped with a control panel, with functions to be set by an operator, in cluding the start of an automatic operation. (See definition of hopper scale). Belt scale—A scale that employs a conveyor belt in contact with a weighing element to determine the weight of a bulk commodity being conveyed. It is generally a part of a system consisting of an input conveyor, the flow scale, and an output conveyor. The con veyor belt may be constructed of various ma terials, including vulcanized rubber, canvas, and plastic. The capacity is generally speci fied in terms of the amount of weight that can be determined in a specified time, and can vary from, for example, 1 ton per hour to 100 or more tons per hour. An operator gen erally directs the flow of product onto the input conveyor. Calibration mode—A means by which the span of a scale can be adjusted by placing a known ‘‘test weight’’ on the scale and manu ally operating a key on a key board. Disturbances—An influence that may occur during the use of a scale but is not within the rated operating conditions of the scale. Event logger—A form of audit trail con taining a series of records where each record contains the identification of the parameter that was changed, the time and date when the parameter was changed, and the new value of the parameter. Final weighment—The last partial load weighed on a hopper scale that is part of the weight of many loads. Hanging scale—A scale that is designed to weigh a load that is freely suspended from an overhead crane or it may be permanently in stalled in an overhead position. The load re ceiver may be a part of the scale such as a pan suspended on chains, or simply a hook that is used to ‘‘pick-up’’ the container of the commodity to be weighed. The tech nology employed may be mechanical, electro-mechanical, or electronic. The loads can be applied either manually or by such means as a crane. Hopper scale—A scale designed for weighing individual loads of a bulk commodity (fish). The load receiver is a cylindrical or rectan gular container mounted on a weighing ele ment. The weighing element may be me chanical levers, a combination of levers and a load cell, or all load cells. The capacity can vary from less than 20 kg to greater than 50 mt. The loads are applied from a bulk source by such means as a conveyor or storage hop per. Each step of the weighing process, that is the loading and unloading of the weigh hopper, is controlled by an operator. Indicator—That part of a scale that indi cates the quantity that is being weighed. Influence factor—A value of an influence quantity, e.g., 10°, that specifies the limits of the rated operating conditions of the scale. Influence quantity—A quantity that is not the subject of the measurement but which influences the measurement obtained within the rated operating conditions of the scale. Influence quantity and disturbance tests— Tests conducted in a laboratory to determine the capability of the scale under test to per form correctly in the environmental influ ences in which they are used and when sub jected to certain disturbances that may occur during the use of the scale. Initial verification—The first evaluation (in spection and test) of a production model of a weighing instrument that has been type evaluated to determine that the production model is consistent with the model that had been submitted for type evaluation. Known weight test—A test in which the load applied is a test weight with a known value simulating the weight of the material that is usually weighed. Load receiver—That part of the scale in which the quantity is placed when being weighed. Material test—A test using a material that is the same or similar to the material that is usually weighed, the weight of which has been determined by a scale other than the scale under test. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00880 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 871 Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, App. A Maximum flow-rate—The maximum flow rate of material specified by the manufac turer at which a belt scale can perform cor rectly. Minimum flow-rate—The minimum flow rate specified by the manufacturer at which a belt scale can perform correctly. Minimum load—The smallest weight load that can be determined by the scale that is considered to be metrologically acceptable. Minimum totalized load—The smallest weight load that can be determined by a belt scale that is considered to be metrologically acceptable. Minimum weighment—The smallest weight that can be determined by a hopper scale that is considered to be metrologically ac ceptable. Motion compensation—The means used to compensate for the motion of the vessel at sea. No-load reference value—A weight value ob tained by a hopper scale when the load re ceiver (hopper) is empty of the product that was or is to be weighed. Non-repeatable weighment—A process where the product after being weighed is disposed of in such a manner that it cannot be re trieved to be reweighed. Number of scale divisions (n)—The number of scale divisions of a scale in normal oper ation. It is the quotient of the scale capacity divided by the value of the scale division. n = Max/d Performance requirements—A part of the regulations or standards that applies to the weighing performance of a scale, e.g., MPEs. Performance test—A test conducted to de termine that the scale is performing within the MPE applicable. Periodic verification—A verification of a weighing instrument at an interval that is specified by regulation or administrative ruling. Platform scale—A scale by the nature of its physical size, arrangement of parts, and rel atively small capacity (generally 220 kg or less) that is adapted for use on a bench or counter or on the floor. A platform scale can be self contained, that is, the indicator and load receiver and weighing elements are all comprised of a single unit, or the indicator can be connected by cable to a separate load receiver and weighing element. The tech nology used may be mechanical, electro-me chanical, or electronic. Loads are applied manually. Rated capacity—The maximum flow-rate in terms of weight per unit time specified by the manufacturer at which a belt scale can perform correctly. Scale division (d)—The smallest digital sub division in units of mass that is indicated by the weighing instrument in normal oper ation. Sealing—A method used to prevent the ad justment of certain operational characteris tics or to indicate that adjustments have been made to those operational characteris tics. Security seals or means—A physical seal such as a lead and wire seal that must be broken in order to change the operating or performance characteristics of the scale, or a number generated by the scale whenever a change is made to an adjustable component. The number must be sequential and it must not be possible for the scale operator to alter it. The number must be displayed whenever the scale is turned on. Significant fault—An error greater than the value specified for a particular scale. For a belt scale: A fault greater than 0.18 percent of the weight value equal to the minimum totalized load. For all other scales: 1 scale division (d). A significant fault does not in clude faults that result from simultaneous and mutually independent causes in the belt scale; faults that imply the impossibility of performing any measurement; transitory faults that are momentary variations in the indications that cannot be interpreted, memorized, or transmitted as a measure ment result; faults so serious that they will inevitably be noticed by those interested in the measurement. Simulated material test—A test in which the load applied is test material simulating the weight of the material that is usually weighed. Simulated test—A test in which the weight indications are developed by means other than weight, e.g., a load cell simulator. Stationary installation—An installation of a scale in a facility on land or a vessel that is tied-up to a dock or in dry dock. Subsequent verification—Any evaluation of a weighing instrument following the initial verification. Suitability for use—A judgement that must be made that certain scales by nature of their design are appropriate for given weigh ing applications. Technical requirements—A part of the regu lations or standards that applies to the oper ational functions and characteristics of a scale, e.g., capacity, scale division, tare. Testing laboratory—A facility for con ducting type evaluation examinations of a scale that can establish its competency and proficiency by such means as ISO Guide 25, ISO 9000, EN 45011, NVLAP, NTEP. Type evaluation—A process for evaluating the compliance of a weighing instrument with the appropriate standard or regulation. User requirements—A part of the regula tions or standards that applies to the oper ator/owner of the scale. Weighment—A single complete weighing op eration. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00881 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 872 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) Pt. 679, App. A ANNEX A OF APPENDIX A TO PART 679— INFLUENCE QUANTITY AND DISTURBANCE TESTS A.1 General—Included in this annex are tests that are intended to ensure that elec tronic scales can perform and function as in tended in the environment and under the conditions specified. Each test indicates, where appropriate, the reference condition under which the intrinsic error is deter mined. A.2 Test Considerations A.2.1 All electronic scales of the same category must be subjected to the same per formance test program. A.2.2 Tests must be carried out on fully operational equipment in its normal oper ational state. When equipment is connected in other than a normal configuration, the procedure must be mutually agreed to by NMFS and the applicant. A.2.3 When the effect of one factor is being evaluated, all other factors must be held relatively constant, at a value close to normal. The temperature is deemed to be relatively constant when the difference be tween the extreme temperatures noted dur ing the test does not exceed 5 °C and the var iation over time does not exceed 5 °C per hour. A.2.4 Before the start of a test, the equip ment under test (EUT) must be energized for a period of time at least equal to the warm up time specified by the manufacturer. The EUT must remain energized throughout the duration of the test. A.3 Tests Test Characteristics under test Condi tions applied A.3.1 Static temperatures ........... Influence factor MPE A.3.2 Damp heat, steady state ... Influence factor MPE A.3.3 Power voltage variation ..... Influence factor MPE A.3.4 Short time power reduction Disturbance .... sf A.3.5 Bursts ................................. Disturbance .... sf A.3.6 Electrostatic discharge ...... Disturbance .... sf A.3.7 Electromagnetic suscepti bility. Disturbance .... sf A.3 Tests A.3.1 Static Temperatures Test method: Dry heat (non condensing) and cold. Object of the test: To verify compliance with the applicable MPE under conditions of high and low temperature. Reference to standard: See Bibliography (1). Test procedure in brief: The test consists of exposure of the EUT to the high and low temperatures specified in section 2.2.4.1 for belt scales, section 3.2.4.1 for automatic hop per scales, and section 4.2.3.1 for platform scales and hanging scales, under ‘‘free air’’ condition for a 2-hour period after the EUT has reached temperature stability. The EUT must be tested during a weighing operation consisting of: For belt scales—the totalization of the Smin, 2 times each at approximately the minimum flow rate, an intermediate flow rate, and the maximum flow rate. For platform, hanging, and automatic hopper scales—tested with at least five different test loads or simulated loads under the following conditions: a. At a reference temperature of 20 °C fol lowing conditioning. b. At the specified high temperature, 2 hours after achieving temperature stabiliza tion. c. At the specified low temperature, 2 hours after achieving temperature stabiliza tion. d. At a temperature of 5 °C, 2 hours after achieving temperature stabilization. e. After recovery of the EUT at the ref erence temperature of 20 °C. Test severities: Duration: 2 hours. Number of test cycles: At least one cycle. Maximum allowable variations: a. All functions must operate as designed. b. All indications must be within the appli cable MPEs. Conduct of test: Refer to the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Publica tions mentioned in section A.4 Bibliography (a) for detailed test procedures. Supplementary information to the IEC test procedures. Preconditioning: 16 hours. Condition of EUT: Normal power supplied and ‘‘on’’ for a time period equal to or great er than the warm-up time specified by the manufacturer. Power is to be ‘‘on’’ for the duration of the test. Adjust the EUT as close to a zero indication as practicable prior to the test. Test Sequence: a. Stabilize the EUT in the chamber at a reference temperature of 20 °C. Conduct the tests as specified in the test procedure in brief and record the following data: i. Date and time, ii. Temperature, iii. Relative humidity, iv. Test load, v. Indication, vi. Errors, and vii. Functions performance. b. Increase the temperature in the chamber to the high temperature specified. Check by measurement that the EUT has reached tem perature stability and maintain the tempera ture for 2 hours. Following the 2 hours, re peat the tests and record the test data indi cated in this A.3.1 Test Sequence section. c. Reduce the temperature in the chamber as per the IEC procedures to the specified low temperature. After temperature sta bilization, allow the EUT to soak for 2 hours. Following the 2 hours, repeat the tests and record the test data as indicated in this A.3.1 Test Sequence section. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00882 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 873 Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, App. A d. Raise the temperature in the chamber as per the IEC procedures to 5 °C. After tem perature stabilization, allow the EUT to soak for 2 hours. Following the 2 hours, re peat the tests and record the test data as in dicated in this A.3.1 Test Sequence section. NOTE: This test relates to a ¥10 °C to + 40 °C range. For special ranges, it may not be necessary. e. Raise the temperature in the chamber as per the IEC procedures and to the 20 °C ref erence temperature. After recovery, repeat the tests and record the test data as indi cated in this A.3.1 Test Sequence section. A.3.2 Damp Heat, Steady State Test method: Damp heat, steady state. Object of the test: To verify compliance with the applicable MPE under conditions of high humidity and constant temperature. Reference to standard: See section A.4 Bibli ography (b) Test procedure in brief: The test consists of exposure of the EUT to a constant tempera ture at the upper limit of the temperature range and of a constant relative humidity of 85 percent for a 2-day period. The EUT must be tested during a weighing operation con sisting of the following: For belt scales—the totalization of the Smin, 2 times each at approximately the minimum flow rate, an intermediate flow rate, and the maximum flow rate. For platform, hanging, and automatic hopper scales—tested with at least five different test loads or simulated loads at a reference tem perature of 20 °C and a relative humidity of 50 percent following conditioning, and at the upper limit temperature and a relative hu midity of 85 percent 2 days following tem perature and humidity stabilization. Test severities: Temperature: upper limit. Humidity: 85 percent (non-condensing). Duration: 2 days. Number of test cycles: At least one test. Maximum Allowable Variations: a. All functions must operate as designed. b. All indications must be within the appli cable MPE. Conduct of the test: Refer to the IEC Publi cations mentioned in section A.4 Bibliog raphy (b) for detailed test procedures. Supplementary information to the IEC test procedures. Preconditioning: None required. Condition of EUT: a. Normal power supplied and ‘‘on’’ for a time period equal to or greater than the warm-up time specified by the manufacturer. Power is to be ‘‘on’’ for the duration of the test. b. The handling of the EUT must be such that no condensation of water occurs on the EUT. c. Adjust the EUT as close to a zero indica tion as practicable prior to the test. Test Sequence: a. Allow 3 hours for stabilization of the EUT at a reference temperature of 20 °C and a relative humidity of 50 percent. Following stabilization, conduct the tests as specified in the test procedures in brief and record the following data: i. Date and time, ii. Temperature, iii. Relative humidity, iv. Test load, v. Indication, vi. Errors, and vii. Functions performance. b. Increase the temperature in the chamber to the specified high temperature and a rel ative humidity of 85 percent. Maintain the EUT at no load for a period of 2 days. Fol lowing the 2 days, repeat the tests and record the test data as indicated in this A.3.2 Test Sequence section. c. Allow full recovery of the EUT before any other tests are performed. A.3.3 Power Voltage Variation A.3.3.1 AC Power Supply Test method: Variation in AC mains power supply (single phase). Object of the test: To verify compliance with the applicable MPEs under conditions of varying AC mains power supply. Reference to standard: See section A.4 Bibli ography (c). Test procedure in brief: The test consists of subjecting the EUT to AC mains power dur ing a weighing operation consisting of the following: For belt scales—while totalizing the Smin at the maximum flow rate. For platform, hanging, and automatic hopper scales—at no load and a test load between 50 percent and 100 percent of weighing capacity. Test severities: Mains voltage: Upper limit U (nom) + 10 percent. Lower limit U (nom) ¥15 percent. Number of test cycles: At least one cycle. Maximum allowable variations: a. All functions must operate correctly. b. All indications must be within MPEs specified in sections 2, 3, or 4 of this appendix to part 679. Conduct of the test: Preconditioning: None required. Test equipment: a. Variable power source, b. Calibrated voltmeter, and c. Load cell simulator, if applicable. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00883 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 874 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) Pt. 679, App. A Condition of EUT: a. Normal power supplied and ‘‘on’’ for a time period equal to or greater than the warm-up time specified by the manufacturer. b. Adjust the EUT as close to a zero indica tion as practicable prior to the test. Test sequence: a. Stabilize the power supply at nominal voltage ±2 percent. b. Conduct the tests specified in the test procedure in brief and record the following data: i. Date and time, ii. Temperature, iii. Relative humidity, iv. Power supply voltage, v. Test load, vi. Indications, vii. Errors, and viii. Functions performance. c. Reduce the power supply to ¥15 percent nominal. d. Repeat the test and record the test data as indicated in this A.3.3 Test Sequence sec tion. e. Increase the power supply to + 10 per cent nominal. f. Repeat the test and record the test data as indicated in this A.3.3 Test Sequence sec tion. g. Unload the EUT and decrease the power supply to nominal power ±2 percent. h. Repeat the test and record the test data as indicated in this A.3.3 Test Sequence sec tion. NOTE: In case of three-phase power supply, the voltage variation must apply for each phase successively. Frequency variation ap plies to all phases simultaneously. A.3.3.2 DC Power Supply Under consideration. A.3.4 Short Time Power Reduction Test method: Short time interruptions and reductions in mains voltage. Object of the test: To verify compliance with the applicable significant fault under condi tions of short time mains voltage interrup tions and reductions. Reference to standard: See section A.4 Bibli ography (d) IEC Publication 1000–4–11 (1994). Test procedure in brief: The test consists of subjecting the EUT to voltage interruptions from nominal voltage to zero voltage for a period equal to 8-10 ms, and from nominal voltage to 50 percent of nominal for a period equal to 16-20 ms. The mains voltage inter ruptions and reductions must be repeated ten times with a time interval of at least 10 seconds. This test is conducted during a weighing operation consisting of the fol lowing: For belt scales—while totalizing at the max imum flow rate at least the Smin (or a time sufficient to complete the test). For platform, hanging, and automatic hopper scales—tested with one small test load or simulated load. Test severities: One hundred percent voltage interruption for a period equal to 8-10 ms. Fifty percent voltage reduction for a period equal to 16-20 ms. Number of test cycles: Ten tests with a min imum of 10 seconds between tests. Maximum allowable variations: The dif ference between the weight indication due to the disturbance and the indication without the disturbance either must not exceed 1d or the EUT must detect and act upon a signifi cant fault. Conduct of the Test: Preconditioning: None required. Test equipment: a. A test generator suitable to reduce the amplitude of the AC voltage from the mains. The test generator must be adjusted before connecting the EUT. b. Load cell simulator, if applicable. Condition of EUT: a. Normal power supplied and ‘‘on’’ for a time period equal to or greater than the warm-up time specified by the manufacturer. b. Adjust the EUT as close to zero indica tion as practicable prior to the test. Test sequence: a. Stabilize all factors at nominal ref erence conditions. b. Totalize as indicated in this A.3.4 Test Sequence section and record the— i. Date and time, ii. Temperature, iii. Relative humidity, iv. Power supply voltage, v. Test load, vi. Indications, vii. Errors, and viii. Functions performance. c. Interrupt the power supply to zero volt age for a period equal to 8-10 ms. During interruption observe the effect on the EUT and record, as appropriate. d. Repeat the steps four times in this A.3.4 Test Sequence section, making sure that there is a 10 second interval between repeti tions. Observe the effect on the EUT. e. Reduce the power supply to 50 percent of nominal voltage for a period equal to 16-20 ms. During reduction observe the effect on the EUT and record, as appropriate. f. Repeat the steps four times in this A.3.4 Test Sequence section, making sure that there is a 10 second interval between repeti tions. Observe the effect on the EUT. A.3.5 Bursts Test method: Electrical bursts. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00884 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 875 Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, App. A Object of the test: To verify compliance with the provisions in this manual under condi tions where electrical bursts are super imposed on the mains voltage. Reference to standard: See section A.4 Bibli ography (e) Test Procedure in brief: The test consists of subjecting the EUT to bursts of double exponential wave-form tran sient voltages. Each spike must have a rise in time of 5 ns and a half amplitude duration of 50 ns. The burst length must be 15 ms, the burst period (repetition time interval) must be 300 ms. This test is conducted during a weighing operation consisting of the fol lowing: For belt scales—while totalizing at the max imum flow rate at least the Smin (or a time sufficient to complete the test). For platform, hanging, and automatic hopper scales—tested with one small test load or simulated load. Test severities: Amplitude (peak value) 1000 V. Number of test cycles: At least 10 positive and 10 negative randomly phased bursts must be applied at 1000 V. Maximum allowable variations: The dif ference between the indication due to the disturbance and the indication without the disturbance either must not exceed the val ues given in sections 2.2.1.1b., 3.2.1.1b., and 4.2.1.1b, of this appendix, or the EUT must detect and act upon a significant fault. Conduct of the test: Refer to the IEC Publi cation referenced in section A.4 Bibliography (e) for detailed test procedures. Supplementary information to the IEC test procedures: Test equipment: A burst generator having an output imped ance of 50 ohms. Test conditions: The burst generator must be adjusted be fore connecting the EUT. The bursts must be coupled to the EUT both on common mode and differential mode interference. Condition of EUT: a. Normal power supplied and ‘‘on’’ for a time period equal to or greater than the warm-up time specified by the manufacturer. b. Adjust the EUT as close to a zero indica tion as practicable prior to the test. Test Sequence: a. Stabilize all factors at nominal ref erence conditions. b. Conduct the test as indicated in this A.3.5 Test Sequence section and record the— i. Date and time, ii. Temperature, iii. Relative humidity, iv. Test load, v. Indication, vi. Errors, and vii. Functions performance. c. Subject the EUT to at least 10 positive and 10 negative randomly phased bursts at the 1000 V mode. Observe the effect on the EUT and record, as appropriate. d. Stabilize all factors at nominal ref erence conditions. e. Repeat the test and record the test data as indicated in this A.3.5 Test Sequence sec tion. A.3.6 Electrostatic Discharge Test method: Electrostatic discharge (ESD). Object of the test: To verify compliance with the provisions of this manual under condi tions of electrostatic discharges. Reference to standard: See section A.4 Bibli ography (f) Test procedure in brief: A capacitor of 150 pF is charged by a suit able DC voltage source. The capacitor is then discharged through the EUT by connecting one terminal to ground (chassis) and the other via 150 ohms to surfaces which are nor mally accessible to the operator. This test is conducted during a weighing operation con sisting of the following: For belt scales—while totalizing at the max imum flow rate at least the Smin (or a time sufficient to complete the test). For platform, hanging, and automatic hopper scales—test with one small test load or simu lated load. Test severities Air Discharge: up to and including 8 kV. Contact Discharge: up to and including 6 kV. Number of test cycles: At least 10 discharges must be applied at intervals of at least 10 seconds between discharges. Maximum allowable variations: The difference between the indication due to the disturbance and the indication with out the disturbance either must not exceed the values indicated in sections 2.2.1.1 b., 3.2.1.1 b., and 4.2.1.1 b. of this appendix, or the EUT must detect and act upon a signifi cant fault. Conduct of the test: Refer to the IEC Publi cation mentioned in section A.4 Bibliography (d) for detailed test procedures. Supplementary information to the IEC test procedures. Preconditioning: None required. Condition of EUT: a. The EUT without a ground terminal must be placed on a grounded plate which projects beyond the EUT by at least 0.1 m on all sides. The ground connection to the ca pacitor must be as short as possible. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00885 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 876 50 CFR Ch. VI (10–1–22 Edition) Pt. 679, App. A b. Normal power supplied and ‘‘on’’ for a time period equal to or greater than the warm-up time specified by the manufacturer. Power is to be ‘‘on’’ for the duration of the test. c. The EUT must be operating under stand ard atmospheric conditions for testing. d. Adjust the EUT as close to a zero indica tion as practicable prior to the test. Test sequence: a. Stabilize all factors at nominal ref erence conditions. b. Conduct test as indicated in this A.3.6 Test Sequence section and record the— i. Date and time, ii. Temperature, iii. Relative humidity, iv. Power supply voltage, v. Test load, vi. Indication, vii. Errors, and viii. Functions performance. c. Approach the EUT with the discharge electrode until discharge occurs and then re move it before the next discharge. Observe the effect of the discharge on the EUT and record, as appropriate. d. Repeat the above step at least nine times, making sure to wait at least 10 sec onds between successive discharges. Observe the effect on the EUT and record as appro priate. e. Stabilize all factors at nominal ref erence conditions. f. Repeat the test and record the test data as indicated in this A.3.6 Test Sequence sec tion. A.3.7 Electromagnetic Susceptibility Test method: Electromagnetic fields (radi ated). Object of the Test: To verify compliance with the provisions in this manual under conditions of electro magnetic fields. Reference to standard: See section A.4 Bibli ography (g). Test procedure in brief: a. The EUT is placed in an EMI chamber and tested under normal atmospheric condi tions. This test is first conducted at one load in a static mode, and the frequencies at which susceptibility is evident are noted. Then tests are conducted at the problem fre quencies, if any, during a weighing operation consisting of the following: For belt scales—while totalizing at the max imum flow rate at least the Smin (or a time sufficient to complete the test). It is then ex posed to electromagnetic field strengths as specified in the Test severities in this sec tion A.3.7 of this annex to appendix A of this part. For platform, hanging, and automatic hopper scales—tested with one small test load. b. The field strength can be generated in various ways: i. The strip line is used at low frequencies (below 30 MHz or in some cases 150 MHz) for small EUT’s; ii. The long wire is used at low frequencies (below 30 MHz) for larger EUT’s; iii. Dipole antennas or antennas with cir cular polarization placed 1 m from the EUT are used at high frequencies. c. Under exposure to electromagnetic fields the EUT is again tested as indicated above. Test severities: Frequency range: 26-1000 MHz. Field strength: 3 V/m. Modulation: 80 percent AM, 1 kHz sine wave. Number of test cycles: Conduct test by con tinuously scanning the specified frequency range while maintaining the field strength. Maximum allowable variations: The dif ference between the indication due to the disturbance and the indication without the disturbance either must not exceed the val ues given in this manual, or the EUT must detect and act upon a significant fault. Conduct of the test: Refer to the IEC Publi cation referenced in section A.4 Bibliography (g) for detailed information on test proce dures. Supplementary information to the IEC test procedures. Test conditions: a. The specified field strength must be es tablished prior to the actual testing (without the EUT in the field). At least 1 m of all ex ternal cables must be included in the expo sure by stretching them horizontally from the EUT. b. The field strength must be generated in two orthogonal polarizations and the fre quency range scanned slowly. If antennas with circular polarization, i.e., log-spiral or helical antennas, are used to generate the electromagnetic field, a change in the posi tion of the antennas is not required. When the test is carried out in a shielded enclosure to comply with international laws prohib iting interference to radio communications, care needs to be taken to handle reflections from the walls. Anechoic shielding might be necessary. Condition of EUT: a. Normal power supplied and ‘‘on’’ for a time period equal to or greater than the warm-up time specified by the manufacturer. Power is to be ‘‘on’’ for the duration of the test. The EUT must be operating under standard atmospheric conditions for testing. b. Adjust the EUT as close to a zero indica tion as practicable prior to the test. VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00886 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B 877 Fishery Conservation and Management Pt. 679, App. A Test sequence: a. Stabilize all factors at nominal ref erence conditions. b. Conduct the test as indicated in this A.3.7 Test Sequence section and record the— i. Date and time, ii. Temperature, iii. Relative humidity, iv. Test load, v. Indication, vi. Errors, and vii. Functions performance. c. Following the IEC test procedures, ex pose the EUT at zero load to the specified field strengths while slowly scanning the three indicated frequency ranges. d. Observe and record the effect on the EUT. e. Repeat the test and observe and record the effect. f. Stabilize all factors at nominal reference conditions. g. Repeat the test and record the test data. A.4 Bibliography Below are references to Publications of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), where mention is made in the tests in annex A to appendix A of this part. a. IEC Publication 68–2–1 (1974): Basic envi ronmental testing procedures. Part 2: Tests, Test Ad: Cold, for heat dissipating equip ment under test (EUT), with gradual change of temperature. IEC Publication 68–2–2 (1974): Basic envi ronmental testing procedures, Part 2: Tests, Test Bd: Dry heat, for heat dissipating equip ment under test (EUT) with gradual change of temperature. IEC Publication 68–3–1 (1974): Background information, Section 1: Cold and dry heat tests. b. IEC Publication 68–2–56 (1988): Environ mental testing, Part 2: Tests, Test Cb: Damp heat, steady state. Primarily for equipment. IEC Publication 68–2–28 (1980): Guidance for damp heat tests. c. IEC Publication 1000–4–11 (1994): Electro magnetic compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Test ing and measurement techniques, Section 11. Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations immunity tests. Section 5.2 (Test levels—Voltage variation). Section 8.2.2 (Execution of the test-voltage variation). d. IEC Publication 1000–4–11 (1994): Electro magnetic compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Test ing and measurement techniques, Section 11: Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations immunity tests. Section 5.1 (Test levels—Voltage dips and short interruptions. Section 8.2.1 (Execution of the test-voltage dips and short interruptions) of the max imum transit speed and the range of oper ating speeds. e. IEC Publication 1000–4–4 (1995): Electro magnetic compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Test ing and measurement techniques—Section 4: Electrical fast transient/burst immunity test. Basic EMC publication. f. IEC Publication 1000–4–2 (1995): Electro magnetic compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Test ing and measurement techniques—Section 2: Electrostatic discharge immunity test. Basic EMC Publication. g. IEC Publication 1000–4–3 (1995): Electro magnetic compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Test ing and measurement techniques—Section 3: Radiated, radio-frequency electromagnetic field immunity test. [63 FR 5845, Feb. 4, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 33783, May 25, 2000] VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:57 Jan 13, 2023 Jkt 256248 PO 00000 Frm 00887 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Q:\50\50V13.TXT PC31sf ra tti ni o n LA P JZ K W 1R 2 w ith $ $ JO B