National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy (NALEP). The Implementation Framework, Plan and Budget

National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy (NALEP) The Implementation Framework, Plan and Budget Republic of South Sudan GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH SUDAN (GOSS) MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY (MAF) MINISTRY OF ANIMAL RESOURCES AND FISHERIES (MARF) National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy (NALEP) The Implementation Framework, Plan and Budget Prepared by Agriculture and Livestock Extension Task Force JUBA, May 2011 This document is intended as a guidance resource to support the implementation of the National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy (NALEP) in South Sudan for the next five years. Although each step in this Implementation Framework should be completed, the level of details depends on the circumstances of individual initiatives, projects and programmes. It is worth to note that it should include, at all levels, the involvement of all stakeholders in extension service provision, and be attractive for the private and non state actors (NSA) to participate in the delive- ry of extension services and the commercialization of agriculture. Written by: Agriculture and Livestock Task Force. Document published with the financial support of the European Commission and the technical assistance of FAO. Photo credits: Cover: Woman working, Augustino Atillio Page 10: Fishermen, Augustino Atillio Page 11: Teak Forest Yambio, Purna Chhettri and Susan Kilobia Page 18: Poultry farming, Purna Chhettri and Susan Kilobia Page 25: Group meeting under Ficus tree, Purna Chhettri and Susan Kilobia iii Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT v FOREWORD vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii 15 THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK (LOGFRAME) 3 15.1 The main narrative summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 15.2 Key Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVIs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 15.3 Main Means Of Verification (MOVs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 15.4 The key Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 16 THE OPERATIONAL PLAN 15 16.1 Specific Objectives, Results and Activity narratives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 16.2 The Workplan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 17 KEY IMPLEMENTING ACTORS AND INTERACTIONS 27 17.1 The implementation institutional setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27 17.2 The key implementing actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 17.3 Interactions of Implementing Actors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29 17.4 The Regulatory Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 18 THE BUDGET 34 18.1 Budget structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 18.2 Total costs estimates (in USD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 ANNEXES 34 Annex 1: The methodology followed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 Annex 2: The Logframe of the NALEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42 Annex 3: The Operational Plan Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52 Annex 4: Detailed Budget for NALEP implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58 iv Abbreviations and Acronyms ALSF Agriculture and Livestock Stakeholder Forum CAADP Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme CAHW Community Animal Health Worker CBO Community Based Organization ERCC Extension and Research Coordinating Committee ESP Extension Service provider FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FBO Faith Based Organization FFS Farmer Field School FINA Farmers’ Information Needs Assessment GoSS Government of the Republic of South Sudan Log Frame Logical Framework MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry MARF Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries MDG Millennium Development Goals MOV Means of Verification NALEP National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy NGO Non Governmental Organization NPA Norwegian peoples Aid NSA Non State Actor OVI Objectively Verifiable Indicator SMS Subject Matter Specialist SPCRP Sudan Productive Capacity Recovery Programme TDT Technology development and transfer UNDP United Nations Development Programme USAID United States Agency for International Development UNDP United Nations Development Programme USD United States Dollar v Acknowledgement The NALEP document and its Implementation Framework is an outcome of a collaborative work carried out by a Task Force. First and foremost, the Task Force wishes to acknowledge the source of funding that enabled this work to be accomplished. In particular, we would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the European Commission (EC) and World Bank (WB) for the finalization of the National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy and its Implementation Framework. The Task Force is also grateful to the Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations (FAO) for the technical assistance provided through Ms. Michelle Glenn, who compiled inputs from States’ consultative workshops, Mr. John Preissing who critically revised the Implementation Framework and the policy document and made significant recommendations and Mr. Menwuyellet Moussie, for his relentless support and inputs. Equally important, we are indebted to the members of the larger working group and the senior officials in the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) and Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries (MARF), for having read through the draft policy document and made invaluable comments, contributions and recommendations. Our sincere thanks go to Messrs Francis Luala and Simon Baka who helped in facilitating the consultative workshops at the States level. The Taskforce would also like to thank all persons who assisted in the realization of the undertaking. Over 300 people were consulted in the course of this policy formulation and implementation framework process through workshops in the ten states of South Sudan and meetings with members of the technical committees in the MAF and MARF. We thank them for sharing their time, experiences, and insights so generously with us. We would also like to thank the Undersecretaries of the two ministries and acknowledge the efforts made by Dr Loro George Leju, Dr John Kanisio and Mr John Choul in initiating the process which formed the basis for our work. Task Force core team: 1. Mr Augustino Atillio, Director, Department of Extension, Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries. 2. Mr Joseph Brok, Director, Department of Extension, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 3. Dr Purna Chhetri, Extension Specialist, SPCRP, UN FAO. 4. Mr Ezana Getahun, Programme Manager, Norwegian People’s Aid. 5. Mr Arne Eriksson, Consultant, European Union. vi Foreword This document presents the Implementation Framework, Plan and Budget of the National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy (NALEP). It is complementary to the main NALEP document. It is structured in four main sections, namely: the Logical Framework, the Operational Plan, The Key Implementing Actors and Interactions, and the Budget. The numeration of these sections is a continuation of the one of the main NALEP document. The first three sections give an indication on what the Republic of South Sudan should do, would it be willing to guarantee for its farmers, animal raisers and fishermen a pluralistic extension system, most likely to transform its agriculture and livestock sector from a subsistence-systems-based one to a more efficient one capable to help the country achieve in a relatively short period of time food security, wealth creation and national economic growth through science based, market oriented, competitive and profitable agricultural and livestock systems. The fourth section (The Budget) presents information on what the Republic of South Sudan needs at once to provide its crops producers, animal raisers, fishermen and people earning their living from natural resources from the forest with the kind of effective and efficient extension services. Otherwise, it theoretically represents the maximum costs that Government of South Sudan and all stakeholders may need to secure in order to guarantee ideal extension services to a vast majority of producers to achieve the goal mentioned above. In practice, however this document is a kind of guide to which to refer, or from which to tap to design any proper extension action for any segment of the national territory, or to the benefit of any socio-economic segment of the population, to achieve an optimal transformation of their agricultural and livestock systems, provided a certain number of key conditions (peace, environment stability, GoSS’ commitment to NALEP implementation…) are durably met. The content stems from the entire NALEP document. Mention of specific sections or sub-sections however is made wherever it is deemed necessary. vii Executive Summary South Sudan is going through rapid transformation. Since the installation of Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the semi autonomous Government in 2005, South Sudan has been committed to meeting the dreams and aspirations of its people. As more than 90 percent of the people depend on agriculture and livestock for their livelihood, the provision of efficient, effective and participatory extension services is seen as key in achieving these national goals. To strengthen extension services provision, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) and Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries (MARF) have developed National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy Directives. This policy document along with its accompanying Implementation Framework is aimed at promoting the development of extension services that can contribute to the wellbeing of the people of South Sudan. In recognizing the role that the private sector can play in extension provision and the need to make extension services responsible and accountable to client needs, the new policy have features that: 1) calls for the adoption of pluralistic and participatory extension services; 2) encourages the privatization of extension services; 3) ensures that research priorities and extension messages meet farmer needs; 4) focuses on developing human resources to commensurate with emerging needs; 5) promotes the use of multiple approaches to meet diversified client needs and agro-ecological zones; 6) promotes empowerment of clientele and service providers; 7) seeks to assure that extension facilitating factors vital to motivate extension service providers (ESPs) are considered in agriculture development activities; 8) address the financing of extension services; and 9) provides a focus on cross cutting issues such as HIV/AIDS, gender and environment affecting agricultural development. The National Agriculture and Livestock Policy and its Implementation Framework have been developed through a participatory process which was led by the Directors of Departments of Extension from MAF and MARF supported by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations’ Sudan Productive Capacity Recovery Programme (SPCRP) and the Support to Agriculture and Forestry Programme, supported by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund. The new policy indeed builds on the past work done by the two ministries. The Task Force reviewed and improved the policy directives based viii on emerging needs and gap analysis, supported by state level sharing and validation workshops where key stakeholders from the government, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), private sector and farmer unions/associations were invited to contribute. Indeed the process and the product can be considered home grown. The National Agriculture and Livestock Policy Directives are also accompanied by implementation guidelines, developed through a consultative process through State level consultative workshops. The challenge ahead will be to develop State level extension implementation strategies. The GoSS, with the support of key partners, presents in this document the operationalization of the policy through the development of a detailed implementation framework along with budgets, time frame and monitoring indicators designed to meet the demands of individual states in line with the guiding principles of NALEP. 1 LOGICAL FRAMEWORK 2 3 15 THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK (LOGFRAME) The complete Log frame table of the NALEP is presented in Annex 2. The design of the NALEP Logical Framework (Log frame), Operational Plan and its budget was prepared by the Agriculture and Livestock Extension Task Force with the support of Mr. Nehru Essomba (SPCRP, international consultant) as well as key national level stakeholders through different consultations and a validation workshop. The NALEP Log frame is harmonized with the NALEP policy document and it has 10 specific objectives that are expected to be completed by the end of July 2016 (the time frame for the operational plan starts in July 2011 for a five years period till July 2016). 15.1 The Main Narrative Summaries The five main narrative summaries of the Log frame (Goal, Overall Objective, Specific Objectives, Results, and Activities) stem from the content of Section 3 (Policy on agriculture and livestock extension services) of the main NALEP document. The numeration of Results is nested to the one of Specific Objectives (example: Result 1.1. = Result number 1 of Specific Objective number 1), and the one of Activities to the one of Results (example: Activity 3.1.3 = Activity number 3 of Result number 3.1). The Goal The Goal targeted through the NALEP implementation is: To transform agriculture and livestock from traditional/subsistence systems to achieve food security, wealth creation and national economic growth through science based, market oriented, competitive and profitable agricultural and livestock systems. It corresponds to the NALEP mission as defined in section 3.2 of the main document. The Overall Objective The Overall Objective to be reached is: To guide the establishment and implementation of a pluralistic extension system which will be instrumental in achieving national agricultural and livestock goals, efficiently contribute to the national economy and reduction of poverty, through developing 4 and improving the efficiency of sustainable agriculture, livestock, water, forestry and rangeland resource sub-sector activities, based on sound environmental practices. It corresponds to the NALEP objective presented in Section 3. The Specific Objectives The ten Specific Objectives are formulated as below: 1. To create a favorable and enabling environment for quality and effective extension services to a broad clientele at all levels 2. To provide a quality and effective extension service to a broad clientele at all levels 3. To promote a wide range of participatory extension approaches and methods 4. To empower rural households and their institutions for the use of appropriate rural services and the adoption of appropriate extension messages 5. To strengthen stakeholders linkages, and the coordination and networking among ESPs at all levels 6. To develop and strengthen human and institutional capacity of extension service providers at all levels including training institutions, for a more effective technology development and transfer (TDT) 7. To promote the provision of facilitating factors for effective extension service delivery 8. To promote and mainstream crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services 9. To develop an effective and sustainable funding mechanism in favor of technology development and rural extension 10. Develop an effective research- extension – user partnership and linkages that will facilitate a research system responsive to farmers needs They derive from the eleven policy statements contained in section 3.4 of the main NALEP document. The Results The thirteen results are as follows: 1.1. NALEP is endorsed at the highest possible level of the GoSS within one year. 1.2. NALEP is adopted by States and implemented at all levels starting second year. 5 1.3. International partnerships are built around NALEP in support of its implementation starting first year. 2.1. Range of appropriate and needs-based extension services are delivered to a broad range of clientele starting second year. 3.1. Relevant and appropriate extension approaches, methods and guidelines are developed and documented starting first year, and disseminated starting second year. 4.1. Rural Households have access to improved skills, tools and techniques for their adoption and use starting third year. 5.1. The setup of institutional arrangements for the implementation of the NALEP is functional at all levels starting second year. 6.1. Capacity of training institutions is strengthened starting second year. 6.2. Capacity of human resources is strengthened at all levels starting second year. 7.1. Support for extension facilitation factors (markets, inputs, credit facilities, infrastructures, irrigation facilities, subsidies…) is increased starting second year. 8.1. The promotion of cross cutting issues is enhanced and mainstreamed in all extension programmes starting first year. 9.1. Funding of extension service delivery is shared between the public, private, NSAs and the farmers themselves starting second year. 10.1. A strategic and an operational plan for agricultural research, extension and education are developed for GoSS and State levels starting second year. They derive from the understatements of the eleven policy statements contained in section 3.4 of the main NALEP document. The Activities The thirty-nine activities defined under the results above are the following: 1.1.1. Present the NALEP, its Implementation and Regulatory Frameworks to the Council of Ministers through MAF and MARF (year 1) 1.1.2. Allocate and mobilize appropriate resources for the implementation of NALEP at all levels (years 1-5) 1.2.1. Launch and disseminate the NALEP to the States (year 1) 1.2.2. Implement the reform of extension organization and management structures at GoSS, State and County levels (years 2-5) 1.3.1. Initiate and formalize as many international partnerships as possible around the 6 NALEP implementation framework, including with the implementation process of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) (years 1-5) 2.1.1. Develop gender sensitive norms, standards, guidelines and a system of registration for ESPs (years 1-2) 2.1.2. Conduct farmers’ information needs assessment at all levels (FINA) (years 1- 2) 2.1.3. Plan and implement extension programmes based on FINA (years 2-5) 2.1.4. Establish multi lateral and bi lateral partnerships to harmonize and coordinate the delivery of extension services (years 1-5) 2.1.5. Facilitate the implementation of NALEP through increased resources for extension (years 1-5) 3.1.1. Create (year 1) and sustain a database of appropriate documents on participatory extension approaches and methods (years 1-5) 3.1.2. Identify, test, adapt and upscale relevant participatory extension approaches and methods (years 1-5) 3.1.3. Develop appropriate extension packages and messages based on agro ecological and socio-economic situations (years 1-5) 4.1.1. Facilitate the formation of groups and associations for easy access to extension services, inputs and technologies (years 1-5) 4.1.2. Increase women representation in all extension activities at all levels to better reach female farmers and women-headed households (years 1-5) 4.1.3. Provide needs-based training and advice to ESPs and clientele using different approaches, including FFS (years 1-5) 4.1.4. Disseminate extension packages using cost effective methods and approaches (years 2-5) 4.1.5. Establish farmers information centers at Payam level (years 2-5) 5.1.1. Develop ToR and implementation guidelines for the NALEP implementation committee, fora and professional working groups(year 1) 5.1.2. Establish NALEP implementation committee at GoSS level (year 1) 5.1.3. Establish professionals working groups at national and State levels (year 1) 5.1.4. Establish NALEP agriculture and livestock stakeholder fora at all levels (year 1) 6.1.1. Update and implement training curriculum of training centers and institutes of MAF and MARF (years 1-5) 6.1.2. Develop minimum staffing levels with minimum qualification and experience required for ESPs (years 1-2) 6.2.1. Develop norms, standards and guidelines for ESPs (year 1) 7 6.2.2. Assess training needs of ESPs, including state and NSAs at all levels (years 1- 2) 6.2.3. Identify and train ESPs according to needs identified (years 2-5) 7.1.1. Develop a communication strategy for advocacy, lobbying and facilitation in favor of extension services using all available channels (radio, TV, internet…) at all levels, mobilize resources and implement (years 2-5) 7.1.2. Facilitate the establishment of linkages of farmers to providers of facilitation factors (traders, market information sources, input suppliers, micro-credit institutions, irrigation…) (years 1-5) 7.1.3. Develop a clear strategy on subsidies for farmers (years 1-5) 8.1.1. Conduct a study to identify and prioritize cross cutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services specific to Southern Sudan (year 1) 8.1.2. Develop capacity through the training of ESPs on cross-cutting issues identified and ways to address it (years 2-5) 8.1.3. Institute a yearly national conference and follow-up meetings at State, County and Payam on the promotion and mainstreaming of cross cutting issues in extension programmes (year 1) 9.1.1. Organize a study to delineate areas of intervention for private and public extension services (year 1) 9.1.2. Develop and establish a sustainable funding mechanism in favor of extension services, based on the results and recommendations of the study (years 2-3) 9.1.3. Initiate and establish a donor coordination meeting to mobilize financial support for a coordinated extension service delivery (year 1) 10.1.1. Develop a strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education at Goss and State levels (years 1-2) 10.1.2. Mobilize resources necessary for the implementation of a strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education at Goss and State levels (years 2-5) 10.1.3. Support existing training institutions and other educational facilities to carry out adaptive research with on-farm trials and on-station research (years 2-5) 15.2 Key Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVIs) Key Objectively Verifiable Objectives (OVIS) of the effective implementation of NALEP are the following: 8 For the goal • Increase in the percentage of population living in food security at all levels • Decrease in the percentage of the population living below poverty line (less than USD 2 /day) • Increase in the contribution of agriculture and livestock to national economic growth • Increase in technology adoption in agricultural and livestock development • Increase in the rate of market-oriented agricultural and livestock production systems For the Overall Objective • Increase in the number of private and NSAs in extension systems • Presence of farmers and farmers institutions in decision-making bodies of ESPs • Increase in the number of farmers organizations • Increase in the demand for extension services • Increase in the production and productivity in crops, livestock, fisheries and forest products • Increase in the agricultural input use index at all levels For Specific Objectives • Official endorsement of the NALEP by the GoSS Council of Ministers and States • At least 8 of the 10 states implement NALEP by end of year 2, and all the 10 by year 5 • Increase in the number of female staff of the extension service system by 5 to 10% every year, at all levels • Existence of a national database on extension participatory approaches and methods by end of year 2 • Increase in the number of extension recipients groups and associations at the levels of Payams and counties • Existence of the NALEP implementation Committee and its organs at GoSS level • Existence of rehabilitated infrastructures in training centers and institutes of MAF and MARF; at least 4 of the 6 centers fully rehabilitated, and equipped with essential resources 9 • Existence of a national communication strategy for advocacy, lobbying and facilitation in favor of extension services • Effective institution of a yearly national conference on the promotion and mainstreaming of cross cutting issues in extension programmes • Existence of a functional funding mechanism in favor of technology development and rural extension • Existence of a strategic and an operational plans documents for agricultural research, extension and education For Results • Increase in quality and quantity of human resources allocated to extension services by GoSS, States and NGOs • Increase in the number of private and NSAs participating effectively in extension service delivery and the commercialization of agriculture at all levels • Increase in the number of partnerships between GoSS and international stakeholders backing up agricultural technology development, extension, and education • Quality of extension packages and documents produced by ESPs • Appropriateness of extension approaches and methods to ecological and socio- economic situations of the country • Participation of rural organizations in NALEP-inspired platforms of exchanges (fora) and decision making bodies (committees and working groups) at all levels • Existence of updated curriculum of training centers and institutes of MAF and MARF • Existence of administrative instructions indicating minimum staffing levels at all levels • Existence of a strategy on subsidies to farmers 15.3 Main Means Of Verification (MOVs) Some of the main MOVs of most of the indicators above are listed below: For the Goal • National and international reports (World Bank, International Monetary Fund…) on the state of the national economy 10 • International reports (UNDP, FAO…) on the state of development, agricultural development, food security • MDG reports • National reports on the state of development, agricultural development, food security For the Overall Objective • International reports (UNDP, FAO…) on the state of development, agricultural development, food security • Periodic reports of NALEP-related projects/programmes • National reports on the state of development, agricultural development, food security For the Specific Objectives and Results • Official Journal of the Southern Sudan • Laws and rules of GoSS and States concerning agriculture, livestock, and forestry development, with regard to extensions services, and the involvement of private and NSAs, and the commercialization of agriculture • Periodic reports of NALEP-related projects/programmes • Annual budget allocations of MAF, MARF, NGOS, and States ministries in charge of agriculture, livestock, and forests • Reports on extension services and activities by MAF, MARF, NGOS, and States ministries in charge of agriculture, livestock, and forests • Project portfolios of GoSS international partners • Reports of ESPS active in the field • Extension documents produced by ESPs • Farmers and farmers’ organizations surveys • Reports of NGOS and other stakeholders on extension service 11 15.4 The Key Assumptions Some of the key assumptions formulated in view of the achievement of results and objectives defined above are given below: • The Republic of South Sudan suffers no major conflict outbreak • No major climatic disaster occurs • NALEP is effectively and sustainably implemented • NALEP is complemented by other appropriate development programmes/projects • GoSS and States are committed to supporting extension services in general, and NALEP and related activities at all levels, in particular • All stakeholders are committed to supporting NALEP and extension services at all levels • GoSS and States are effectively committed to empowering the farmers and supporting farmers’ organizations, and ESPs • The decentralization process is effective • Laws and rules are effectively implemented • MAF and MARF secure appropriate resources and appropriate partners 13 OPERATIONAL PLAN 14 15 16 THE OPERATIONAL PLAN 16.1 Specific Objectives, Results and Activity Narratives 1 To create a favorable and enabling environment for quality and effective extension services to a broad clientele at all levels 1.1. The NALEP is endorsed at the highest possible level of the GoSS within one year 1.1.1. Present the NALEP, its Implementation and Regulatory Frameworks to the Council of Ministers through MAF and MARF (year 1) The Task Force will prepare all working all working documents that MAF and MARF will need to present the NALEP document and its Implementation, Plan and Budget annex document to the Council of Ministers. For the NALEP Regulatory Framework, the Task Force will need to have a suitable consultant for assistance with regard to working documents needed by MAF and MARF in terms of law(s), rules and regulations necessary for NALEP sustainability and its functional modalities, the creation of NALEP-related new institutions, procedures and modalities of interactions among stakeholders involved in NALEP implementation. 1.1.2. Allocate and mobilize appropriate resources for the implementation of NALEP at all levels (years 1-5) 1.2. NALEP is adopted by States and implemented at all levels starting second year 1.2.1. Launch and disseminate the NALEP to the States (year 1) GoSS Officials at all levels and all stakeholders involved in NALEP implementation should be involved. This activity will include field visits, meetings all levels, within a coherent programme schedule, and a lot of communication through all media (newspaper, radio, television, internet…) at all levels. 1.2.2. Implement the reform of extension organization and management structures at GoSS, State and County levels (years 2-5) This activity will deal with making the institutional setup proposed for NALEP functional. It will require, after the appropriate regulatory framework is in place, to work on allocating and making available resources at all levels. Meetings, field visits, monitoring, communication actions will be necessary for that. 16 1.3. International partnerships are built around NALEP in support of its implementation starting first year. 1.3.1. Initiate and formalize as many international partnerships as possible around the NALEP implementation framework, including with the implementation process of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) (years 1-5) MAF and MARF will organize a Roundtable of Development Partners for the implementation of NALEP at the national level. All partners involved in development technical assistance, financing, and activities should be invited to initiate discussions on what could be done, how, where and by whom. A permanent organ to periodically monitor the process should be established early during year 1. This organ should meet regularly every year. MAF and MARF will also ensure, in particular, that GoSS adhere to the CAADP and its financing process at the level of the African Union (AU) and of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), as well as to the AU 2003 Maputo Declaration on Agriculture and Food Security, in case the Government of Sudan was not already involved. In case this latter was already involved, MAF and MARF should strengthen linkages with these processes and in particular engage in the formulation of a Compact Plan, which will be national agricultural investment plan with the CAADP framework for the financing of agriculture in the Republic of South Sudan. Technical assistance in this endeavour could be sought from partners such as FAO, the World Bank… 2 To provide a quality and effective extension service to a broad clientele at all levels 2.1. Range of appropriate and needs-based extension services are delivered to a broad range of clientele starting second year 2.1.1. Develop gender sensitive norms, standards, guidelines and a system of registration for ESPs (years 1-2) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF develop normative documents needed. 17 2.1.2. Conduct farmers’ information needs assessment at all levels (FINA) (years 1-2) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF conduct a survey at all levels, using a FINA approach. 2.1.3. Plan and implement extension programmes based on FINA (years 2-5) 2.1.4. Establish multi lateral and bi-lateral partnerships to harmonize and coordinate the delivery of extension services (years 1-5) This activity will be implemented by MAF and MARF alongside Activity 1.3.1. 2.1.5. Facilitate the implementation of NALEP through increased resources for extension (years 1-5) This activity concerns all partners (GoSS, States, Development Partners, NGOS and other Stakeholders). 3 To promote a wide range of participatory extension approaches and methods 3.1. Relevant and appropriate extension approaches, methods and guidelines are developed and documented starting first year, and disseminated starting second year 3.1.1. Create (year 1) and sustain a database of appropriate documents on participatory extension approaches and methods (years 1-5) This activity will require that MAF and MARF search for appropriate technical assistance from well indicated Development Partners during year 1. 3.1.2. Identify, test, adapt and upscale relevant participatory extension approaches and methods (years 1-5) 3.1.3. Develop appropriate extension packages and messages based on agro ecological and socio-economic situations (years 1-5) 4 To empower rural households and their institutions for the use of appropriate rural services and the adoption of appropriate extension messages 4.1. Rural Households have access to improved skills, tools and techniques for their adoption and use starting third year 18 4.1.1. Facilitate the formation of groups and associations for easy access to extension services, inputs and technologies (years 1-5) 4.1.2. Increase women representation in all extension activities at all levels to better reach female farmers and women-headed households (years 1-5) 4.1.3. Provide needs-based training and advice to ESPs and clientele using different approaches, including FFS (years 1-5) 4.1.4. Disseminate extension packages using cost effective methods and approaches (years 2-5) 4.1.5. Establish farmers information centers at Payam level (years 2-5) 5 To strengthen stakeholders linkages, and the coordination and networking among ESPs at all levels 5.1.1. Develop ToR and implementation guidelines for the NALEP implementation committee, fora and professional working groups (year 1) This activity will be undertaken with the assistance of an appropriate consultant who will draft the working document to be finalized by the Task Force. It should be conducted in coherence with Activity 1.1.1 5.1.2. Establish NALEP implementation committee at GoSS level (year 1) 5.1.3. Establish professionals working groups at national and State levels (year 1) 5.1.4. Establish NALEP agriculture and livestock stakeholder fora at all levels (year 1) 6 To develop and strengthen human and institutional capacity of extension service providers at all levels including training institutions, for a more effective technology development and transfer (TDT) 6.1. Capacity of training institutions is strengthened starting second year 6.1.1. Update and implement training curriculum of training centers and institutes of MAF and MARF (years 1-5) The updating exercise will be undertaken in year 1 with the assistance of an appropriate consultant who will draft the working document to be finalized by the Task Force. 19 6.1.2. Develop minimum staffing levels with minimum qualification and experience required for ESPs (years 1-2) 6.2. Capacity of human resources is strengthened at all levels starting second year 6.2.1. Develop norms, standards and guidelines for ESPs (year 1) This activity will be undertaken with the assistance of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants who will draft the working document to be finalized by the Task Force. It should be conducted in coherence with Activity 1.1.1 6.2.2. Assess training needs of ESPs, including state and NSAs at all levels (years 1-2) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF conduct a survey at all levels. 6.2.3. Identify and train ESPs according to needs identified (years 2-5) 7 To promote the provision of facilitating factors for effective extension service delivery 7.1. Support for extension facilitation factors (markets, inputs, credit facilities, infrastructures, irrigation facilities, subsidies…) is increased starting second year 7.1.1. Develop a communication strategy for advocacy, lobbying and facilitation in favor of extension services using all available channels (radio, TV, internet…) at all levels, mobilize resources and implement (years 2-5) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF 7.1.2. Facilitate the establishment of linkages of farmers to providers of facilitation factors (traders, market information sources, input suppliers, micro-credit institutions, irrigation…) (years 1-5) 7.1.3. Develop a clear strategy on subsidies for farmers (years 1-5) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF 20 8 To promote and mainstream crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services 8.1. The promotion of cross cutting issues is enhanced and mainstreamed in all extension programmes starting first year 8.1.1. Conduct a study to identify and prioritize cross cutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services specific to Southern Sudan (year 1) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF 8.1.2. Develop capacity through the training of ESPs on cross-cutting issues identified and ways to address it (years 2-5) 8.1.3. Institute a yearly national conference and follow-up meetings at State, County and Payam on the promotion and mainstreaming of cross cutting issues in extension programmes (year 1) 9 To develop an effective and sustainable funding mechanism in favor of technology development and rural extension 9.1. Funding of extension service delivery is shared between the public, private, NSAs and the farmers themselves starting second year 9.1.1. Organize a study to delineate areas of intervention for private and public extension services (year 1) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF 9.1.2. Develop and establish a sustainable funding mechanism in favor of extension services, based on the results and recommendations of the study (years 2- 3) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF 9.1.3. Initiate and establish a donor coordination meeting to mobilize financial support for a coordinated extension service delivery (year 1) 21 10 Develop an effective research- extension – user partnership and linkages that will facilitate a research system responsive to farmers needs 10.1. A strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education are developed for GoSS and State levels starting second year 10.1.1. Develop a strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education at Goss and State levels (years 1-2) MAF and MARF may need to request an appropriate technical assistance with FAO or any other well indicated Development Partner. 10.1.2. Mobilize resources necessary for the implementation of a strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education at Goss and State levels (years 2-5) 10.1.3. Support existing training institutions and other educational facilities to carry out adaptive research with on-farm trials and on-station research (years 2-5) 16.2 The Workplan The NALEP Workplan is presented in Figure 5 below. It shows the sequence of implementation of activities, according to deadlines already provided in their narratives above within a five-year timeframe. The starting point of NALEP is the month of July 2011. Annual deadlines for activities are therefore fixed at every month of July up till 2016. 22 Specific Objective Results Activities Deadline (July 2016) July- 12 July- 13 July- 14 July- 15 July- 16 1. To create a favorable and enabling environment for quality and effective extension services to a broad clientele at all levels 1.1 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.3 1.3.1 2. To provide a quality and effective extension service to a broad clientele at all levels 2.1 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 3. To promote a wide range of participatory extension approaches and methods 3.1 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 4. To empower rural households and their institutions for the use of appropriate rural services and the adoption of appropriate extension messages 4. 1 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5 5. To strengthen stakeholders linkages, and the coordination and networking among ESPs at all levels 5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.1.4 6. To develop and strengthen human and institutional capacity of extension service providers at all levels including training institutions, for a more effective technology development and transfer (TDT) 6.1 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.2 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 23 7. To promote the provision of facilitating factors for effective extension service delivery 7.1 7.1.1 7.1.2 7.1.3 8. To promote and mainstream crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services 8.1 8.1.1 8.1.2 8.1.3 9. To develop an effective and sustainable funding mechanism in favor of technology development… 9.1 9.1.1 9.1.2 10. Develop an effective research- extension – user partnership and linkages that will facilitate a research system responsive to farmers needs 10.1 10.1.1 10.1.2 10.1.3 Specific Objective Results Activities Deadline (July 2016) July- 12 July- 13 July- 14 July- 15 July- 16 25 KEY IMPLEMENTING ACTORS AND INTERACTIONS 26 27 17 KEY IMPLEMENTING ACTORS AND INTERACTIONS 17.1 The Implementation Institutional Setup The institutional setup proposed for NALEP implementation is given in Figure 6. It multi layered structure, which will carry responsibilities going beyond NALEP, will covers the GoSS, State, County and Payam levels. It has been thoroughly described in Section 4.4 of the main document. On top, at the GOSS level, will be the Inter-ministerial Steering Committee. The Technical Committee established under it will include all key sector stakeholders. A NALEP Implementation Committee will be formed under this latter to coordinate the work of making the policy operational. The implementation committee will have a number of Working Groups under it including notably, the one in charge of Extension and Research Coordination. 28 Figure 6: The institutional setup proposed for the implementation of NALEP Interministerial Technical Committee (GOSS) State Agriculture & Livestock Stakeholder County Agriculture & Livestock Stakeholder Payam Agriculture & Livestock Stakeholder Extension Clientele Groups NALEP implementation Sub-Committee Other Sub-Committees Ext. & Research Coordinating Committee Other Committees Ext. & Research Coordinating Committee Other Committees Payam Implementation Team Working Groups (e. g Ext. & Res. Coordination) Other Working Groups GoSS Level State Level County Level Grass Root Level Payam Level 29 17.2 The key implementing actors Within and beyond the institutional setup presented above, actors to be involved in NALEP implementation can be grouped under four main categories: Government bodies, Development Partners, Extension Service Providers and the Extension Clientele itself. The Government bodies comprise the GoSS, the governments of States, the Counties and Payams administrations, and all the field lower structures controlled by the Government. Extension Service Providers include public as well private and non state actors. Research institutions, Higher Education Institutions, NGOs, CBOs, Public extensions providers, etc belong to this last group. The category of Development Partners would basically include multilateral as well as bilateral donors, development agencies of the United Nations system and international NGOs. 17.3 Interactions of Implementing Actors Actors involved in the implementation of NALEP could interact among themselves in many ways, formally (through agreements, contracts or any other formal links) or not. These various links inter-related or not, are summarized in Figure 3. Partnerships will be one category of these links. They will concern two or more actors of the Government bodies (GoSS or States), the Development Partners and the Extension Service Providers, in situations where actors concerned will come together to cooperate in favor of extension service delivery or organization. Financing will be another reason for interaction. It will correspond to situations where a donor (Government body or a Development partner) or a group of donors will provide financial resources for actions of extension service delivery or supervision/coordination of this latter. It would involve the donor(s), the beneficiaries, and the specific implementing actor(s). A typical supervision situation will be one where an actor, usually a technical public body, will have the responsibility to look over activities implemented by Extension Service Providers to ensure that the service is provided within the norms in enforcement. The alter ego of this situation will be one of reporting, in which the supervisee(s) will have to report to the supervisor(s) and other stakeholder(s) on activities convened. 30 Fi g u re 7 : A n il lu st ra ti o n o f in te ra ct io n s th at m ay e xi st a m o n g t h e m ai n a ct o rs o f N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n G ov er n m en t B o d ie s The NALEP implementation Extension Service Providers D ev el o p m n t Pa rt n er s Ex te n si o n C lie n te le G ro u p s In te rm in is te ri al T ec h n ic al C o m m it te e (G O SS ) St at e A g ri cu lt u re & L iv es to ck S ta ke h o ld er C o u n ty A g ri cu lt u re & L iv es to ck S ta ke h o ld er Pa ya m A g ri cu lt u re & L iv es to ck S ta ke h o ld er Ex te n si o n C lie n te le G ro u p s N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n Su b -C o m m it te e O th er Su b -C o m m it te es Ex t. & R es ea rc h C o o rd in at in g C o m m it te e O th er C o m m it te es Ex t. & R es ea rc h C o o rd in at in g C o m m it te e O th er C o m m it te es Pa ya m Im p le m en ta ti o n Te am W o rk in g G ro u p s (e . g E xt . & R es . C o o rd in at io n ) O th er W o rk in g G ro u p s G o SS L ev el St at e Le ve l C o u n ty L ev el G ra ss R o o t L ev el Pa ya m L ev el 31 17.4 The Regulatory Framework The regulatory framework will be constituted of all NALEP-related official documents (laws, rules, norms, guidelines…) in enforcement the Republic of Sudan, which would provide the foundation for the various actions undertaken to be legal and guarantee conditions of their effectiveness and efficiency in extension services delivery. In case some of these documents may not be available, it will be necessary to have them established and approved / endorsed by the appropriate authorities. Figure 4 illustrates the backgorund provided by the Regulatory Framework for NALEP implementing actors and their interactions. It is important that the regulatory framework be conducive for all actors, so as to enable them to efficiently participate in the interactions in which they will be involved. It will be necessary that it be closely monitored by Government authorities to that end. Three main areas will be of interest for making the regulatory framework conducive: • The creation of new NALEP-inspired bodies. The organs of the institutional setup for the implementation of NALEP should receive some kind of official or legal existence, through Figure 8: An illustration of the background constituted by the Regulatory Framework for NALEP implementation Government Bodies Th e N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n Ex te n si o n S er vi ce P ro vi d er s Developmnt Partners Extension Clientele Groups Regulatory 32 official documents carrying the clear description of their mandates, their structure, the role of various factors involved, etc. • The procedures and modalities guidelines for interactions described above. A minimum codification and formalization of the various types of interactions to be established for the implementation of NALEP will be indispensable, to avoid overlapping and redundancy, and promote synergy as much as possible in the process. • The normative framework for ESPs, which will include the norms and guidelines, and other documents presenting the instructions to be followed or respected by all actors in their involvement with NALEP implementation. 33 THE BUDGET 34 18 THE BUDGET 18.1 Budget Structure The budget is structured in two main components: the General Costs, and the Specific Operational Costs for Activities. The first component presents estimated costs under three sub-components: the GoSS, the State and the County levels. Every sub-component includes itemized costs for the rehabilitation of infrastructures, non expendable procurement, and expendable procurement, the personnel, contracts with ESPs, training, travels, and general operation costs. The second component presents exclusively operational costs that would be needed to implement the 39 specific activities identified for the NALEP. As indicated in the foreword of this document, this budget presents information on what the Republic of South Sudan could need at once if it were to provide its crops producers, animal raisers, fishermen and people getting their living out natural resources from the forest with ideal extension services, over the entire national territory and for the benefit of all the agricultural and livestock systems, in the most efficient and effective way. Otherwise, it theoretically represents the maximum costs that GoSS and all stakeholders would need to secure, in order to guarantee ideal extension services to all its producers, through NALEP implementation. 18.2 Total Costs Estimates (in USD) The total budget necessary to implement the NALEP over the entire national territory, under the conditions presented in the foreword of this document amounts to USD 137,837,631 (one hundred thirty seven million eight hundred thirty seven thousand six hundred thirty one US dollars), of which USD 108,408,706 (one hundred eight million four hundred eight thousand and seven hundred and six US dollars) would fall under General Costs and USD 29,428,925 (twenty nine million four hundred twenty eight thousand and nine hundred twenty five US dollars) under Specific Operational Costs for Activities. 35 Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total A. General Costs A.1 GoSS Level 1,783 033 1,266,357 1,310,679 1,588,830 1,404,033 7,352,932 A.2 State Level 6,466,333 3,566,955 3,691,798 5,229,083 3,954,747 22,908,917 A.3 County Level 20,795,603 12,476,203 12,912,870 18,129,591 13,832,590 78,146,857 Sub-total A – General Costs 29,044,969 17,309,515 17,915,348 24,947,504 19,191,369 108,408,706 B. Specific Operational Costs for Activities B.1 Specific Objective 1 185,000 46,575 48,205 49,892 51,639 381,311 B.2 Specific Objective 2 65,000 77,625 21,425 22,174 22,950 209,174 B.3 Specific Objective 3 530,000 439,875 337,436 349,246 361,470 2,018,027 B.4 Specific Objective 4 95,000 4,005,450 4,145,641 4,290,738 4,440,914 16,977,743 B.5 Specific Objective 5 290,000 217,350 224,957 232,831 240,980 1,206,118 B.6 Specific Objective 6 170,000 181,125 80,342 83,154 86,064 600,685 B.7 Specific Objective 7 70,000 124,200 53,561 55,436 57,376 360,573 B.8 Specific Objective 8 200,000 51,570 53,561 55,436 57,376 418,123 B.9 Specific Objective 9 100,000 113,850 107,123 0 0 320,973 B.10 Specific Objective 10 150,000 1,728,450 1,628,262 1,685,251 1,744,235 6,936,198 Sub-total B – Specific Operational Costs 1,855,000 6,986,250 6,700,512 6,824,159 7,063,004 29,428,925 Grand Total 30,899,969 24,295,250 24,615,861 31,771,663 26,254,373 137,837,631 Table 1: The total estimates costs (in USD) for the NALEP implementation over a 5-year period 36 This total amount would be fragmented into USD 30,899,969 (thirty million eight hundred ninety nine thousand and nine hundred sixty nine US dollars) for the first year of implementation, USD 24,295,250 (twenty four million two hundred ninety five thousand and two hundred fifty US dollars) for the second year, USD 24,615,861 (twenty four million six hundred fifteen thousand and eight hundred sixty one US dollars) for the third year, USD 31,771,663 (thirty one million seven hundred seventy one thousand and six hundred sixty three US dollars) for the fourth year, and USD 26,254,373 (twenty six million two hundred fifty four thousand and three hundred seventy three US dollars). 37 ANNEXES Annex 1: The Methodology Followed The formulation of the draft of this document was conducted by the NALEP Task Force in an iterative process within and between four progressive steps: 1 The Log frame A standard Log frame table was adapted to fit the specific case of the NALEP. It was not developed out of a standard Logical Framework Approach, as it was meant to translate the content of the already existing NALEP main document into action. Thus the five main narrative summaries of the Log frame (Goal, Overall Objective, Specific Objectives, Results, and Activities) were defined based on the content of Section 3 (Policy on agriculture and livestock extension services) of the main NALEP document, as was mentioned in section 15.1. The ten Specific Objectives were derived from the eleven Policy Statements presented in section 3.4 of the main NALEP document. Their correspondence with these latter is presented in Table A1.a below. The Results expected under each Specific Objective as well as corresponding Activities could be defined after that, before the OVIs, MOVs and assumptions could be worked out. Assumptions were not developed for Results, as OVIs, MOVs and Assumptions were not elaborated for Activities. 2 Operational plan worksheet The Operational Plan Worksheet was developed to present Specific Objectives, Results, and Activities in a logic sequence, and for every Activity, the key implementing actors, the specific operational costs, and the deadline to have it completed. It should be mentioned that the specific operational cost (titled Indicative cost in the worksheet) column was completed after the budget was finalized. The starting for NALEP implementation was fixed to July 2011. 38 3 Budget Quantities considered for some of the budgetary lines are given in Table A1.b. Items concerned were Vehicles, Data processing equipments, and Printing and reproduction materials. The number of States considered was 10, the number of Counties 79 and the number of Payam (for bicycles) was 513. The base of some of the lump sum calculations is given in Table A1.c. The budgetary lines concerned were the Rehabilitation of infrastructures, Non expendable procurement, Expendable procurement, Personnel, Contracts with ESPs, Training, Travels and General operations expenses. Costs were estimated on a yearly base, except where specifically mentioned. Vehicle operation and maintenance was estimated on the base of 1/3 of the procurement of the vehicle. Insurance was estimated at 2% of the vehicle or equipment cost. The year 2011 served as a reference for all costs estimates. Beginning from year 2 (2012), the inflation rate considered was estimated at 3.5%. Costs estimates were adjusted to this rate using the inflation rate index of value 1.035 in year 2, value 1.071225 in year 3, value 1.108718 in year 4 and value 1.147523 in year 5. 4 Validation workshop The draft NALEP Log frame, Operational plan Worksheet, and Budget were presented to a panel of GoSS authorities from MAF and MARF, in presence of representatives of main Development Partners. The finalization of the document was made based on their amendments, comments and recommendations. 39 Table A1.a: Correspondence between the NALEP statements and the specific objectives N° NALEP Policy Statements N° Specific Objective 1 Extension services provision and organization: The Government will create capacity for quality extension services to the large number of clients, and encourage broad involvement of stakeholders in service provision 2 To provide a quality and effective extension service to a broad clientele at all levels 2 Privatization and commercialization: The government will create a favorable environment for private sector participation in extension service provision. 1 To create a favorable and enabling environment for quality and effective extension services to a broad clientele at all levels 3 Extension approaches and methods: Extension service providers will use and test multiple approaches and methods aiming at developing models for reaching various clienteles. 3 To promote a wide range of participatory extension approaches and methods 4 Contents and choice of extension messages: Contents and choice of extension messages will be developed based on clients’ socio- economic and cultural context. 5 Clientele empowerment: The service providers, public or private, will contribute to clientele empowerment. 4 To empower rural households and their institutions for the use of appropriate rural services and the adoption of appropriate extension messages1 6 Stakeholder coordination and networking: Strengthen coordination and networking among extension service providers, clientele and other stakeholders. 5 To strengthen stakeholders linkages, and the coordination and networking among ESPs at all levels 7 Human Resource Development of extension service providers: Extension service personnel will be recruited, trained and equipped to respond to the emerging needs of the clientele, including gender considerations. 6 To develop and strengthen human and institutional capacity of extension service providers at all levels including training institutions, for a more effective technology development and transfer (TDT) 8 Technology Development and Packaging: The government will develop a strategy to promote research, extension and farmers linkages 10 Develop an effective research- extension – user partnership and linkages that will facilitate a research system responsive to farmers needs 9 Extension facilitating factors: Extension service providers will contribute to improved access to extension facilitating factors by strengthening linkages between agriculture, livestock and rural development actors. 7 To promote the provision of facilitating factors for effective extension service delivery 10 Financing of extension services: The government will ensure that private and public financial allocation is sufficient to meet the requirements of extension services. 9 To develop an effective and sustainable funding mechanism in favor of technology development and rural extension 11 Mainstreaming crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services delivery: ESPs will address relevant cross- cutting issues in their extension activities 8 To promote and mainstream crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services 40 Table A1.b: Quantities and cost per unit of some of the items appearing in the NALEP Budget Description Year 1 Year 4 Total Cost/unit (US$) GoSS level Vehicles 4WD 2 2 4 45,000 Pick-up 2 2 4 35,000 Data processing equipments Computer + access. 10 10 20 3,000 Printing and reproduction materials Large size Photocopier + access. 2 2 4 3,000 Medium size Photocopier + access. 4 4 8 1,500 Small size Photocopier + access. 10 10 20 750 State level Vehicles 4WD 10 10 20 45,000 Pick-up 20 20 40 35,000 Data processing equipments Computer + access. 20 20 40 3,000 Printing and reproduction materials Large size Photocopier + access. 10 10 20 3,000 Medium size Photocopier + access. 10 10 20 1,500 Small size Photocopier + access. 20 20 40 750 County level Vehicles 4WD pick-up hard top 79 79 158 35,000 Motorbikes 316 316 632 3,000 Bicycles for Payams 513 513 1026 100 Data processing equipments Computer + access. 158 158 316 3,000 Printing and reproduction materials Small size Photocopier + access. 79 79 158 750 41 Table A1.c: Base of lump sum calculations per year (USD) of the NALEP Budget Description GoSS Per State Per County A.1.a Rehabilitation of infrastructures (yr 1) 200,000 100,000 50,000 A.1.b Non expendable procurement Office furniture (year 1) 150,000 75,000 30,000 Agricultural equipment 20,000 10,000 5,000 A.1.c Expendable procurement Data processing supplies 15,000 7,500 2,500 Printing and reproduction supplies 20,000 10,000 5,000 Office stationery 25,000 12,500 6,250 Agricultural inputs 10,000 5,000 2,500 A.2.d Personnel Salary supplements 240,000 60,000 60,000 Consultants 100,000 Other personnel costs (5% personnel) 17,000 3,000 1,000 A.2.e Contracts with ESPs 200,000 50,000 10,000 A.2.f Training 200,000 50,000 10,000 A.2.g Travels Local travels 150,000 50,000 12,000 International travels 50,000 A.2.h General operation expenses Coordination meetings 60,000 24,000 12,000 Miscellaneous 50,000 20,000 10,000 42 A n n ex 2 : Th e Lo g f ra m e o f th e N A LE P N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s G o al To t ra ns fo rm a gr ic ul tu re a nd li ve st oc k fr om tr ad iti on al /s ub si st en ce s ys te m s to a ch ie ve f oo d se cu rit y, w ea lth c re at io n an d na tio na l e co no m ic gr ow th t hr ou gh s ci en ce b as ed , m ar ke t or ie nt ed , co m pe tit iv e an d pr ofi ta bl e ag ric ul tu ra l a nd liv es to ck s ys te m s • In cr ea se in t h e p er ce n ta g e o f p o p u la ti o n li vi n g in f o o d s ec u ri ty at a ll le ve ls • D ec re as e in t h e p er ce n ta g e o f th e p o p u la ti o n li vi n g b el o w p o ve rt y lin e (l es s th an U SD 2 /d ay ) • In cr ea se in t h e co n tr ib u ti o n o f ag ri cu lt u re a n d li ve st o ck t o n at io n al e co n o m ic g ro w th • In cr ea se in t ec h n o lo g y ad o p ti o n in a g ri cu lt u ra l a n d li ve st o ck d ev el o p m en t • In cr ea se in t h e ra te o f m ar ke t- o ri en te d a g ri cu lt u ra l a n d li ve st o ck p ro d u ct io n s ys te m s • N at io n al a n d in te rn at io n al r ep o rt s (W o rl d B an k, In te rn at io n al m o n et ar y Fu n d … ) o n t h e st at e o f th e n at io n al ec o n o m y • In te rn at io n al r ep o rt s (U N D P, F A O … ) o n t h e st at e o f d ev el o p m en t, ag ri cu lt u ra l d ev el o p m en t, f o o d se cu ri ty • M D G r ep o rt s • N at io n al r ep o rt s o n t h e st at e o f d ev el o p m en t, a g ri cu lt u ra l d ev el o p m en t, f o o d s ec u ri ty • Th e So u th er n S u d an s u ff er s n o m aj o r co n fl ic t o u tb re ak • N o m aj o r cl im at ic d is as te r o cc u rs • N A LE P is e ff ec ti ve ly a n d su st ai n ab ly im p le m en te d an d c o m p le m en te d b y o th er a p p ro p ri at e d ev el o p m en t p ro g ra m m es / p ro je ct s O ve ra ll O b je ct iv e 43 To g ui de t he e st ab lis hm en t an d im pl em en ta tio n of a p lu ra lis tic e xt en si on s ys te m w hi ch w ill b e in st ru m en ta l i n ac hi ev in g na tio na l a gr ic ul tu ra l an d liv es to ck g oa ls , e ffi ci en tly c on tr ib ut e to t he na tio na l e co no m y an d re du ct io n of p ov er ty , th ro ug h de ve lo pi ng a nd im pr ov in g th e ef fic ie nc y of s us ta in ab le a gr ic ul tu re , l iv es to ck , w at er , f or es tr y an d ra ng el an d re so ur ce s ub -s ec to r ac tiv iti es , ba se d on s ou nd e nv iro nm en ta l p ra ct ic es . Th is o b je ct iv e w ill b e ac h ie ve d t h ro u g h : • Th e em p o w er m en t o f fa rm er s to ad eq u at el y re sp o n d t o f o o d s ec u ri ty is su es a n d t h e g ro w in g d em an d s o f d o m es ti c an d in te rn at io n al m ar ke ts fo r cr o p , l iv es to ck a n d f o re st p ro d u ct s th ro u g h t h e tr an sf er o f ad ap te d r es ea rc h te ch n o lo g ie s, • O rg an iz in g f ar m er s in v ia b le r u ra l o rg an iz at io n s, P ro vi si o n o f ru ra l ad vi so ry a n d e xt en si o n s er vi ce , a n d r u ra l cr ed it ; s u p p ly /m ar ke ti n g o f im p ro ve d fa rm in p u t an d o u tp u t; im p ro ve m en t, co m m er ci al iz at io n a n d in te n si fi ca ti o n o f fa rm in g s ys te m s • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f p ri va te an d N SA s in e xt en si o n s ys te m s • Pr es en ce o f fa rm er s an d f ar m er s in st it u ti o n s in d ec is io n -m ak in g b o d ie s o f ES Ps • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f fa rm er s o rg an iz at io n s • In cr ea se in t h e d em an d f o r ex te n si o n s er vi ce s • In cr ea se in t h e p ro d u ct io n a n d p ro d u ct iv it y in c ro p s, li ve st o ck , fi sh er ie s an d f o re st p ro d u ct s • In cr ea se in t h e ag ri cu lt u ra l i n p u t u se in d ex a t al l l ev el s • In te rn at io n al r ep o rt s (U N D P, F A O … ) o n t h e st at e o f d ev el o p m en t, ag ri cu lt u ra l d ev el o p m en t, f o o d se cu ri ty • Pe ri o d ic r ep o rt s o f N A LE P- re la te d p ro je ct s/ p ro g ra m m es • N at io n al r ep o rt s o n t h e st at e o f d ev el o p m en t, a g ri cu lt u ra l d ev el o p m en t, f o o d s ec u ri ty • G o SS is c o m m it te d t o su p p o rt in g N A LE P as a w h o le a n d it s ac ti vi ti es a t al l l ev el s • G o SS a n d S ta te s ar e ef fe ct iv el y co m m it te d t o em p o w er in g t h e fa rm er s an d s u p p o rt in g f ar m er s o rg an iz at io n , a n d E SP s • D ec en tr al iz at io n p ro ce ss is ef fe ct iv e 44 N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s Sp ec ifi c o b je ct iv es 1. To c re at e a fa vo ra b le a n d e n ab lin g en vi ro n m en t fo r q u al it y an d ef fe ct iv e ex te n si o n s er vi ce s to a b ro ad c lie n te le a t al l l ev el s It s h o u ld in cl u d e, a t al l l ev el s, t h e in vo lv em en t o f al l s ta ke h o ld er s in ex te n si o n s er vi ce p ro vi si o n , a n d b e at tr ac ti ve f o r th e p ri va te a n d n o n st at e ac to rs ( N SA ) to p ar ti ci p at e in t h e d el iv er y o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s an d t h e co m m er ci al iz at io n o f ag ri cu lt u re • O ffi ci al e n d o rs em en t o f th e N A LE P b y th e G o SS C o u n ci l o f M in is te rs a n d St at es • In cr ea se in fi n an ci al r es o u rc es al lo ca te d t o e xt en si o n s er vi ce s b y G o SS , S ta te s, N G O s an d p ar tn er s • In cr ea se in q u al it y an d q u an ti ty o f h u m an r es o u rc es a llo ca te d t o ex te n si o n s er vi ce s b y G o SS , S ta te s an d N G O s • A va ila b ili ty o f an u p d at ed r eg u la to ry fr am ew o rk f o r ag ri cu lt u ra l te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t, e xt en si o n , an d e d u ca ti o n • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f p ar tn er sh ip s b et w ee n G o SS a n d in te rn at io n al s ta ke h o ld er s b ac ki n g u p ag ri cu lt u ra l t ec h n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t, ex te n si o n , a n d e d u ca ti o n • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er a n d t h e d iv er si ty o f ac ti ve E SP S at a ll le ve ls • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f p ri va te an d N SA s p ar ti ci p at in g e ff ec ti ve ly in e xt en si o n s er vi ce d el iv er y an d t h e co m m er ci al iz at io n o f ag ri cu lt u re a t al l l ev el s • Ex is te n ce o f ex te n si o n c o m m it te es , fo ra a n d w o rk in g g ro u p s at a ll le ve ls • O ffi ci al J o u rn al o f th e So u th er n Su d an • La w s an d r u le s o f G o SS a n d S ta te s co n ce rn in g a g ri cu lt u re , l iv es to ck , an d f o re st ry d ev el o p m en t, w it h re g ar d t o e xt en si o n s se rv ic es , a n d t h e in vo lv em en t o f p ri va te a n d N SA s, a n d th e co m m er ci al iz at io n o f ag ri cu lt u re • Pe ri o d ic r ep o rt s o f N A LE P- re la te d p ro je ct s/ p ro g ra m m es • A n n u al b u d g et a llo ca ti o n s o f M A F, M A R F, N G O S, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in ch ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , l iv es to ck , a n d fo re st s • R ep o rt s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce s an d ac ti vi ti es b y M A F, M A R F, N G O S, an d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , l iv es to ck , a n d f o re st s • Pr o je ct p o rt fo lio s o f G o SS in te rn at io n al p ar tn er s • La w s an d r u le s ar e ef fe ct iv el y im p le m en te d • D ec en tr al iz at io n p ro ce ss is ef fe ct iv e • G o SS a n d a n d S ta te s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g ex te n si o n s er vi ce s 45 N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s 2. To p ro vi d e a q u al it y an d e ff ec ti ve ex te n si o n s er vi ce t o a b ro ad cl ie n te le a t al l l ev el s • A t le as t 8 o f th e 10 s ta te s im p le m en t N A LE P b y en d o f ye ar 2 , a n d a ll th e 10 b y ye ar 5 • Ex is te n ce o f g en d er s en si ti ve n o rm s, st an d ar d s an d g u id el in es d o cu m en ts fo r ES Ps • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f ex te n si o n p ro je ct s/ p ro g ra m m es b ei n g a ct u al ly im p le m en te d a n d t h ei r n at io n al te rr it o ry c o ve ra g e • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f ES Ps ef fe ct iv el y o p er at io n al in t h e fi el d • Im p ro ve d q u al it y o f ex te n si o n p ac ka g es a n d d o cu m en ts p ro d u ce d b y ES Ps • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f fa rm er s o rg an iz at io n s, a n d h o u se h o ld b en efi ti n g f ro m e xt en si o n s er vi ce s p ro vi si o n • In cr ea se in t h e q u an ti ty a n d q u al it y o f co m m o d it ie s an d o th er ag ri cu lt u ra l p ro d u ce s co m in g f ro m ru ra l a re as • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f fe m al e st af f o f th e ex te n si o n s er vi ce s ys te m b y 5 to 1 0% e ve ry y ea r, at a ll le ve ls • R ep o rt s o f M A F, M A R F, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • R ep o rt s o f ES PS a ct iv e in t h e fi el d • Ex te n si o n d o cu m en ts p ro d u ce d b y ES Ps • Fa rm er s an d f ar m er s o rg an iz at io n s su rv ey s • R ep o rt s o f N G O S a n d o th er st ak eh o ld er s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce • A ll st ak eh o ld er s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g N A LE P an d e xt en si o n s er vi ce s at a ll le ve ls • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s 3. To p ro m o te a w id e ra n g e o f p ar ti ci p at o ry e xt en si o n a p p ro ac h es an d m et h o d s • Ex is te n ce o f a n at io n al d at ab as e o n ex te n si o n p ar ti ci p at o ry a p p ro ac h es an d m et h o d s b y en d o f ye ar 2 • A p p ro p ri at en es s o f ex te n si o n ap p ro ac h es a n d m et h o d s to ec o lo g ic al a n d s o ci o -e co n o m ic si tu at io n s o f th e co u n tr y • M o re t h an 5 0% o f Pa ya m s an d co u n ti es c o ve re d b y ex te n si o n se rv ic es b y ye ar 5 • R ep o rt s o f M A F, M A R F, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • R ep o rt s o f ES PS a ct iv e in t h e fi el d • Ex te n si o n d o cu m en ts p ro d u ce d b y ES Ps • Fa rm er s an d f ar m er s o rg an iz at io n s su rv ey s • R ep o rt s o f N G O S a n d o th er st ak eh o ld er s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce • A ll st ak eh o ld er s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g N A LE P an d e xt en si o n s er vi ce s at a ll le ve ls • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s 4. To e m p o w er r u ra l h o u se h o ld s an d th ei r in st it u ti o n s fo r th e u se o f ap p ro p ri at e ru ra l s er vi ce s an d t h e ad o p ti o n o f ap p ro p ri at e ex te n si o n m es sa g es • Pa rt ic ip at io n o f ke y ru ra l o rg an iz at io n s in N A LE P- in sp ir ed p la tf o rm s o f ex ch an g es ( fo ra ) an d d ec is io n m ak in g b o d ie s (c o m m it te es an d w o rk in g g ro u p s) a t al l l ev el s • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f ex te n si o n re ci p ie n ts g ro u p s an d a ss o ci at io n s at th e le ve ls o f Pa ya m s an d c o u n ti es • In cr ea se in t h e fe m al e st af f ra ti o o f th e ex te n si o n s er vi ce s ys te m a t al l le ve ls • R ep o rt s o f M A F, M A R F, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • R ep o rt s o f N A LE P- in sp ir ed f o ra a n d d ec is io n m ak in g b o d ie s • Fa rm er s an d f ar m er s o rg an iz at io n s su rv ey s • R ep o rt s o f N G O S an d o th er st ak eh o ld er s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce • A ll st ak eh o ld er s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g N A LE P an d e xt en si o n s er vi ce s at a ll le ve ls • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s 46 N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s 5. To s tr en g th en s ta ke h o ld er s lin ka g es , a n d t h e co o rd in at io n a n d n et w o rk in g a m o n g E SP s at a ll le ve ls • Ex is te n ce o f th e N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n C o m m it te e an d it s o rg an s at G o SS le ve l • Ex is te n ce o f ag ri cu lt u re a n d li ve st o ck st ak eh o ld er f o ra a n d it s o rg an s at St at e, C o u n ty , a n d P ay am le ve ls • Ex is te n ce o f N A LE P- in sp ir ed p la tf o rm s o f ex ch an g es ( fo ra ) an d o f d ec is io n m ak in g b o d ie s (c o m m it te es an d w o rk in g g ro u p s) a t al l l ev el s • R ep o rt s o f M A F, M A R F, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • R ep o rt s o f N A LE P- in sp ir ed f o ra a n d d ec is io n m ak in g b o d ie s • R ep o rt s o f N G O S an d o th er st ak eh o ld er s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce • A ll st ak eh o ld er s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g N A LE P an d e xt en si o n s er vi ce s at a ll le ve ls • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s 6. To d ev el o p a n d s tr en g th en h u m an an d in st it u ti o n al c ap ac it y o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce p ro vi d er s at a ll le ve ls in cl u d in g t ra in in g in st it u ti o n s, fo r a m o re e ff ec ti ve t ec h n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d t ra n sf er ( TD T) Th e in st it u ti o n al c ap ac it y st re n g th en in g sh o u ld a im a t p ro m o ti n g e ff ec ti ve re se ar ch -e xt en si o n -u se r p ar tn er sh ip a n d lin ka g es in T D T • Ex is te n ce o f u p g ra d ed e xt en si o n tr ai n in g s ta ff • Ex is te n ce o f u p d at ed e xt en si o n cu rr ic u lu m o f tr ai n in g c en te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F • Ex is te n ce o f re h ab ili ta te d in fr as tr u ct u re s in t ra in in g c en te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F; a t le as t 4 o f th e 6 ce n te rs f u lly r eh ab ili ta te d , an d e q u ip p ed w it h e ss en ti al re so u rc es • Ex is te n ce o f ad m in is tr at iv e in st ru ct io n s in d ic at in g m in im u m st af fi n g le ve ls a t al l l ev el s • W o rk in g d o cu m en ts o n n o rm s, st an d ar d s an d g u id el in es d o cu m en ts fo r ES Ps • Fi el d v is it s in t ra in in g c en te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F • Tr ai n in g m an u al s o f tr ai n in g c en te rs an d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F • D is cu ss io n s w it h t ra in ee s o f tr ai n in g ce n te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F • V is it s to M A F an d M A R F • A ll st ak eh o ld er s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g N A LE P an d e xt en si o n s er vi ce s at a ll le ve ls • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s 7. To p ro m o te t h e p ro vi si o n o f fa ci lit at in g f ac to rs f o r ef fe ct iv e ex te n si o n s er vi ce d el iv er y • Ex is te n ce o f a n at io n al co m m u n ic at io n s tr at eg y fo r ad vo ca cy , lo b b yi n g a n d f ac ili ta ti o n in f av o r o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s • Ex is te n ce o f lin ka g es o f fa rm er s to p ro vi d er s o f fa ci lit at in g f ac to rs (t ra d er s, in p u ts s u p p lie rs , m ic ro -c re d it in st it u ti o n s… ) fo r ex te n si o n • Ex is te n ce o f a st ra te g y o n s u b si d ie s to fa rm er s • W o rk in g d o cu m en ts o f an d r ep o rt s o n t h e d ev el o p m en t o f a n at io n al co m m u n ic at io n s tr at eg y fo r ad vo ca cy , lo b b yi n g a n d f ac ili ta ti o n in f av o r o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • V is it s to M A F, M A R F, a n d S ta te s • A ll st ak eh o ld er s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g N A LE P an d e xt en si o n s er vi ce s at a ll le ve ls • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s 8. To p ro m o te a n d m ai n st re am cr o ss cu tt in g is su es in a g ri cu lt u re an d li ve st o ck e xt en si o n s er vi ce s • Ex is te n ce o f an o ffi ci al p ri o ri ty li st o f cu tt in g a cr o ss is su es in a g ri cu lt u ra l an d li ve st o ck e xt en si o n • Ef fe ct iv e in st it u ti o n o f a ye ar ly n at io n al c o n fe re n ce o n t h e p ro m o ti o n a n d m ai n st re am in g o f cr o ss c u tt in g is su es in e xt en si o n p ro g ra m m es • A rc h iv es o f th e d ep ar tm en ts o f ex te n si o n o f M A F an d M A R F • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F • W o rk in g d o cu m en ts o f an d re p o rt s o n t h e o rg an iz at io n o f a ye ar ly n at io n al c o n fe re n ce o n t h e p ro m o ti o n a n d m ai n st re am in g o f cr o ss c u tt in g is su es in e xt en si o n p ro g ra m m e • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s 47 N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s 9. To d ev el o p a n e ff ec ti ve a n d su st ai n ab le f u n d in g m ec h an is m in fa vo u r o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l e xt en si o n • Ex is te n ce o f a fu n ct io n al f u n d in g m ec h an is m in f av o u r o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l e xt en si o n • W o rk in g d o cu m en ts o f an d r ep o rt s o n t h e d ev el o p m en t o f a fu n ct io n al fu n d in g m ec h an is m in f av o u r o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l ex te n si o n • R ep o rt s o f M A F, M A R F an d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F in st it u ti o n s in c h ar g e o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l e xt en si o n • V is it s to M A F an d M A R F in st it u ti o n s in c h ar g e o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l e xt en si o n • A ll st ak eh o ld er s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g N A LE P an d e xt en si o n s er vi ce s at a ll le ve ls • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s 10 . D ev el o p a n e ff ec ti ve r es ea rc h - ex te n si o n – u se r p ar tn er sh ip an d li n ka g es t h at w ill f ac ili ta te a re se ar ch s ys te m r es p o n si ve t o fa rm er s n ee d s • Ex is te n ce o f a st ra te g ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s d o cu m en ts f o r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n a n d ed u ca ti o n • R ep o rt s an d w o rk in g d o cu m en ts o n th e st ra te g ic a n d o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n an d e d u ca ti o n • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F • V is it s to M A F an d M A R F • A ll st ak eh o ld er s ar e co m m it te d t o s u p p o rt in g N A LE P an d e xt en si o n s er vi ce s at a ll le ve ls • M A F an d M A R F se cu re ap p ro p ri at e re so u rc es a n d ap p ro p ri at e p ar tn er s R es u lt s 1. 1. T h e N A LE P is e n d o rs ed a t th e h ig h es t p o ss ib le le ve l o f th e G o SS w it h in o n e ye ar • O ffi ci al e n d o rs em en t o f th e N A LE P b y th e G o SS C o u n ci l o f M in is te rs a n d St at es • A va ila b ili ty o f an u p d at ed r eg u la to ry fr am ew o rk f o r ag ri cu lt u ra l te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t, e xt en si o n , an d e d u ca ti o n • O ffi ci al J o u rn al o f th e So u th er n Su d an • La w s an d r u le s o f G o SS a n d S ta te s co n ce rn in g a g ri cu lt u re , l iv es to ck , an d f o re st ry d ev el o p m en t, w it h re g ar d t o e xt en si o n s se rv ic es , a n d t h e in vo lv em en t o f p ri va te a n d N SA s, a n d th e co m m er ci al iz at io n o f ag ri cu lt u re 1. 2. N A LE P is a d o p te d b y St at es a n d im p le m en te d a t al l l ev el s st ar ti n g se co n d y ea r • Ev o lu ti o n o f th e in st it u ti o n al s et u p o f th e ex te n si o n s er vi ce s ys te m • A m o u n t o f fi n an ci al r es o u rc es al lo ca te d t o e xt en si o n s er vi ce s b y G o SS , S ta te s, N G O s an d p ar tn er s • In cr ea se in q u al it y an d q u an ti ty o f h u m an r es o u rc es a llo ca te d t o ex te n si o n s er vi ce s b y G o SS , S ta te s an d N G O s • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f p ri va te an d N SA s p ar ti ci p at in g e ff ec ti ve ly in e xt en si o n s er vi ce d el iv er y an d t h e co m m er ci al iz at io n o f ag ri cu lt u re a t al l l ev el s • La w s an d r u le s o f G o SS a n d S ta te s co n ce rn in g a g ri cu lt u re , l iv es to ck , an d f o re st ry d ev el o p m en t, w it h re g ar d t o e xt en si o n s se rv ic es , a n d t h e in vo lv em en t o f p ri va te a n d N SA s, a n d th e co m m er ci al iz at io n o f ag ri cu lt u re • Pe ri o d ic r ep o rt s o f N A LE P- re la te d p ro je ct s/ p ro g ra m m es • A n n u al b u d g et a llo ca ti o n s o f M A F, M A R F, N G O S, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in ch ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , l iv es to ck , a n d fo re st s • R ep o rt s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce s an d ac ti vi ti es b y M A F, M A R F, N G O S, an d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , l iv es to ck , a n d fo re st s Pr o je ct p o rt fo lio s o f G o SS in te rn at io n al p ar tn er s 48 N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s 1. 3. I n te rn at io n al p ar tn er sh ip s ar e b u ilt ar o u n d N A LE P in s u p p o rt o f it s im p le m en ta ti o n s ta rt in g fi rs t ye ar • In cr ea se in t h e n u m b er o f p ar tn er sh ip s b et w ee n G o SS a n d in te rn at io n al s ta ke h o ld er s b ac ki n g u p ag ri cu lt u ra l t ec h n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t, ex te n si o n , a n d e d u ca ti o n • Pe ri o d ic r ep o rt s o f N A LE P- re la te d p ro je ct s/ p ro g ra m m es • R ep o rt s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce s an d ac ti vi ti es b y M A F, M A R F, N G O S, an d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , l iv es to ck , a n d f o re st s • Pr o je ct p o rt fo lio s o f G o SS in te rn at io n al p ar tn er s 2. 1. R an g e o f ap p ro p ri at e an d n ee d s- b as ed e xt en si o n s er vi ce s ar e d el iv er ed t o a b ro ad r an g e o f cl ie n te le s ta rt in g s ec o n d y ea r • Q u al it y o f ex te n si o n p ac ka g es a n d d o cu m en ts p ro d u ce d b y ES Ps • In cr ea se in t h e q u an ti ty a n d q u al it y o f co m m o d it ie s an d o th er ag ri cu lt u ra l p ro d u ce s co m in g f ro m ru ra l a re as t o t h e m ar ke ts • In cr ea se in f em al e st af f ra ti o o f th e ex te n si o n s er vi ce s ys te m a t al l l ev el s • R ep o rt s o f ES PS a ct iv e in t h e fi el d • Ex te n si o n d o cu m en ts p ro d u ce d b y ES Ps • Fa rm er s an d f ar m er s o rg an iz at io n s su rv ey s • R ep o rt s o f N G O S a n d o th er st ak eh o ld er s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce 3. 1. R el ev an t an d a p p ro p ri at e ex te n si o n a p p ro ac h es , m et h o d s an d g u id el in es a re d ev el o p ed a n d d o cu m en te d s ta rt in g fi rs t ye ar , a n d d is se m in at ed s ta rt in g s ec o n d y ea r • Ex is te n ce o f a n at io n al d at ab as e o n ex te n si o n p ar ti ci p at o ry e xt en si o n ap p ro ac h es a n d m et h o d s • A p p ro p ri at en es s o f ex te n si o n ap p ro ac h es a n d m et h o d s to ec o lo g ic al a n d s o ci o -e co n o m ic si tu at io n s o f th e co u n tr y • R ep o rt s o f ES PS a ct iv e in t h e fi el d • Ex te n si o n d o cu m en ts p ro d u ce d b y ES Ps • Fa rm er s an d f ar m er s o rg an iz at io n s su rv ey s • R ep o rt s o f N G O S a n d o th er st ak eh o ld er s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce 4. 1. R u ra l H o u se h o ld s h av e ac ce ss to im p ro ve d s ki lls , t o o ls a n d te ch n iq u es f o r th ei r ad o p ti o n a n d u se s ta rt in g t h ir d y ea r • Pa rt ic ip at io n o f ru ra l o rg an iz at io n s in N A LE P- in sp ir ed p la tf o rm s o f ex ch an g es ( fo ra ) an d d ec is io n m ak in g b o d ie s (c o m m it te es a n d w o rk in g g ro u p s) a t al l l ev el s • In cr ea se in f em al e st af f ra ti o o f th e ex te n si o n s er vi ce s ys te m a t al l l ev el s • R ep o rt s o f M A F, M A R F, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • R ep o rt s o f N A LE P- in sp ir ed f o ra a n d d ec is io n m ak in g b o d ie s • Fa rm er s an d f ar m er s o rg an iz at io n s su rv ey s • R ep o rt s o f N G O S an d o th er st ak eh o ld er s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce 5. 1. T h e se tu p o f in st it u ti o n al ar ra n g em en ts f o r th e im p le m en ta ti o n o f th e N A LE P is fu n ct io n al a t al l l ev el s st ar ti n g se co n d y ea r • Ex is te n ce o f th e N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n C o m m it te e an d it s o rg an s at G o SS le ve l • Ex is te n ce o f ag ri cu lt u re a n d li ve st o ck st ak eh o ld er f o ra a n d it s o rg an s at St at e, C o u n ty , a n d P ay am le ve ls • N A LE P- in sp ir ed p la tf o rm s o f ex ch an g es ( fo ra ) an d o f d ec is io n m ak in g b o d ie s (c o m m it te es a n d w o rk in g g ro u p s) a t al l l ev el s • R ep o rt s o f M A F, M A R F, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • R ep o rt s o f N A LE P- in sp ir ed f o ra a n d d ec is io n m ak in g b o d ie s • R ep o rt s o f N G O S an d o th er st ak eh o ld er s o n e xt en si o n s er vi ce 49 N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s 6. 1. C ap ac it y o f tr ai n in g in st it u ti o n s is st re n g th en ed s ta rt in g s ec o n d y ea r • Ex is te n ce o f u p d at ed c u rr ic u lu m o f tr ai n in g c en te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F • Ex is te n ce o f re h ab ili ta te d in fr as tr u ct u re s in t ra in in g c en te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F • Fi el d v is it s in t ra in in g c en te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F • Tr ai n in g m an u al s o f tr ai n in g c en te rs an d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F • D is cu ss io n s w it h t ra in ee s o f tr ai n in g ce n te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F 6. 2. C ap ac it y o f h u m an r es o u rc es is st re n g th en ed a t al l l ev el s st ar ti n g se co n d y ea r • Ex is te n ce o f ad m in is tr at iv e in st ru ct io n s in d ic at in g m in im u m st af fi n g le ve ls a t al l l ev el s • W o rk in g d o cu m en ts o n n o rm s, st an d ar d s an d g u id el in es d o cu m en ts fo r ES Ps • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F • V is it s to M A F an d M A R F 7. 1. S u p p o rt f o r ex te n si o n f ac ili ta ti o n fa ct o rs ( m ar ke ts , i n p u ts , c re d it fa ci lit ie s, in fr as tr u ct u re s, ir ri g at io n fa ci lit ie s, s u b si d ie s… ) is in cr ea se d st ar ti n g s ec o n d y ea r • Ex is te n ce o f lin ka g es o f fa rm er s to p ro vi d er s o f fa ci lit at in g f ac to rs (t ra d er s, in p u ts s u p p lie rs , m ic ro -c re d it in st it u ti o n s… ) fo r ex te n si o n • Ex is te n ce o f a st ra te g y o n s u b si d ie s to fa rm er s • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F, a n d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • V is it s to M A F, M A R F, a n d S ta te s 8. 1. T h e p ro m o ti o n o f cr o ss cu tt in g is su es is e n h an ce d a n d m ai n st re am ed in a ll ex te n si o n p ro g ra m m es s ta rt in g fi rs t ye ar • Ex is te n ce o f an o ffi ci al p ri o ri ty li st o f cu tt in g a cr o ss is su es in a g ri cu lt u ra l an d li ve st o ck e xt en si o n • Ef fe ct iv e in st it u ti o n o f a ye ar ly n at io n al c o n fe re n ce o n t h e p ro m o ti o n a n d m ai n st re am in g o f cr o ss c u tt in g is su es in e xt en si o n p ro g ra m m es • A rc h iv es o f th e d ep ar tm en ts o f ex te n si o n o f M A F an d M A R F • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F • W o rk in g d o cu m en ts o f an d re p o rt s o n t h e o rg an iz at io n o f a ye ar ly n at io n al c o n fe re n ce o n t h e p ro m o ti o n a n d m ai n st re am in g o f cr o ss c u tt in g is su es in e xt en si o n p ro g ra m m e 9. 1. F u n d in g o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce d el iv er y is s h ar ed b et w ee n t h e p u b lic , p ri va te , N SA s an d t h e fa rm er s th em se lv es s ta rt in g s ec o n d ye ar • Ex is te n ce o f a fu n ct io n al f u n d in g m ec h an is m in f av o u r o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l e xt en si o n • W o rk in g d o cu m en ts o f an d r ep o rt s o n t h e d ev el o p m en t o f a fu n ct io n al fu n d in g m ec h an is m in f av o u r o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l ex te n si o n • R ep o rt s o f M A F, M A R F an d S ta te s m in is tr ie s in c h ar g e o f ag ri cu lt u re , liv es to ck a n d f o re st s • R ep o rt s o f M A F an d M A R F in st it u ti o n s in c h ar g e o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l e xt en si o n • V is it s to M A F an d M A R F in st it u ti o n s in c h ar g e o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l e xt en si o n 10 .1 . A s tr at eg ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n an d e d u ca ti o n a re d ev el o p ed f o r G o SS a n d S ta te le ve ls s ta rt in g se co n d y ea r • Ex is te n ce o f a st ra te g ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s d o cu m en ts f o r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n a n d ed u ca ti o n • R ep o rt s an d w o rk in g d o cu m en ts o n th e st ra te g ic a n d o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n an d e d u ca ti o n 50 N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s A ct iv it ie s 1. 1. 1. Pr es en t th e N A LE P, it s Im p le m en ta ti o n a n d R eg u la to ry F ra m ew o rk s to t h e C o u n ci l o f M in is te rs t h ro u g h M A F an d M A R F (y ea r 1) 1. 1. 2. A llo ca te a n d m o b ili ze a p p ro p ri at e re so u rc es f o r th e im p le m en ta ti o n o f N A LE P at a ll le ve ls ( ye ar s 1- 5) 1. 2. 1. La u n ch a n d d is se m in at e th e N A LE P to t h e St at es ( ye ar 1 ) 1. 2. 2. Im p le m en t th e re fo rm o f ex te n si o n o rg an iz at io n a n d m an ag em en t st ru ct u re s at G o SS , S ta te a n d C o u n ty le ve ls ( ye ar s 2- 5) 1. 3. 1. In it ia te a n d f o rm al iz e as m an y in te rn at io n al p ar tn er sh ip s as p o ss ib le a ro u n d t h e N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n f ra m ew o rk , i n cl u d in g w it h t h e im p le m en ta ti o n p ro ce ss o f th e C o m p re h en si ve A fr ic a A g ri cu lt u re D ev el o p m en t Pr o g ra m m e (C A A D P) ( ye ar s 1- 5) 2. 1. 1. D ev el o p g en d er s en si ti ve n o rm s, s ta n d ar d s, g u id el in es a n d a s ys te m o f re g is tr at io n f o r ES Ps ( ye ar s 1- 2) 2. 1. 2. C o n d u ct f ar m er s’ in fo rm at io n n ee d s as se ss m en t at a ll le ve ls ( FI N A ) (y ea rs 1 -2 ) 2. 1. 3. Pl an a n d im p le m en t ex te n si o n p ro g ra m m es b as ed o n F IN A ( ye ar s 2- 5) 2. 1. 4. Es ta b lis h m u lt i l at er al a n d b i l at er al p ar tn er sh ip s to h ar m o n iz e an d c o o rd in at e th e d el iv er y o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 2. 1. 5. Fa ci lit at e th e im p le m en ta ti o n o f N A LE P th ro u g h in cr ea se d r es o u rc es f o r ex te n si o n ( ye ar s 1- 5) 3. 1. 1. C re at e (y ea r 1) a n d s u st ai n a d at ab as e o f ap p ro p ri at e d o cu m en ts o n p ar ti ci p at o ry e xt en si o n a p p ro ac h es a n d m et h o d s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 3. 1. 2. Id en ti fy , t es t, a d ap t an d u p sc al e re le va n t p ar ti ci p at o ry e xt en si o n a p p ro ac h es a n d m et h o d s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 3. 1. 3. D ev el o p a p p ro p ri at e ex te n si o n p ac ka g es a n d m es sa g es b as ed o n a g ro e co lo g ic al a n d s o ci o -e co n o m ic s it u at io n s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 4. 1. 1. Fa ci lit at e th e fo rm at io n o f g ro u p s an d a ss o ci at io n s fo r ea sy a cc es s to e xt en si o n s er vi ce s, in p u ts a n d t ec h n o lo g ie s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 4. 1. 2. In cr ea se w o m en r ep re se n ta ti o n in a ll ex te n si o n a ct iv it ie s at a ll le ve ls t o b et te r re ac h f em al e fa rm er s an d w o m en -h ea d ed h o u se h o ld s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 4. 1. 3. Pr o vi d e n ee d s- b as ed t ra in in g a n d a d vi ce t o E SP s an d c lie n te le u si n g d if fe re n t ap p ro ac h es , i n cl u d in g F FS ( ye ar s 1- 5) 4. 1. 4. D is se m in at e ex te n si o n p ac ka g es u si n g c o st e ff ec ti ve m et h o d s an d a p p ro ac h es ( ye ar s 2- 5) 4. 1. 5. Es ta b lis h f ar m er s in fo rm at io n c en te rs a t Pa ya m le ve l ( ye ar s 2- 5) 5. 1. 1. D ev el o p T o R a n d im p le m en ta ti o n g u id el in es f o r th e N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n c o m m it te e, f o ra a n d p ro fe ss io n al w o rk in g g ro u p s( ye ar 1 ) 5. 1. 2. Es ta b lis h N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n c o m m it te e at G o SS le ve l ( ye ar 1 ) 5. 1. 3. Es ta b lis h p ro fe ss io n al s w o rk in g g ro u p s at n at io n al a n d S ta te le ve ls ( ye ar 1 ) 5. 1. 4. Es ta b lis h N A LE P ag ri cu lt u re a n d li ve st o ck s ta ke h o ld er f o ra a t al l l ev el s (y ea r 1) 6. 1. 1. U p d at e an d im p le m en t tr ai n in g c u rr ic u lu m o f tr ai n in g c en te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 6. 1. 2. D ev el o p m in im u m s ta ffi n g le ve ls w it h m in im u m q u al ifi ca ti o n a n d e xp er ie n ce r eq u ir ed f o r ES Ps ( ye ar s 1- 2) 6. 2. 1. D ev el o p n o rm s, s ta n d ar d s an d g u id el in es f o r ES Ps ( ye ar 1 ) 6. 2. 2. A ss es s tr ai n in g n ee d s o f ES Ps , i n cl u d in g s ta te a n d N SA s at a ll le ve ls ( ye ar s 1- 2) 6. 2. 3. Id en ti fy a n d t ra in E SP s ac co rd in g t o n ee d s id en ti fi ed ( ye ar s 2- 5) 6. 3. 1. D ev el o p a s tr at eg ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n a n d e d u ca ti o n a t G o ss a n d S ta te le ve ls ( ye ar s 1- 2) 6. 3. 2. M o b ili ze r es o u rc es n ec es sa ry f o r th e im p le m en ta ti o n o f a st ra te g ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n a n d e d u ca ti o n a t G o ss a n d S ta te le ve ls ( ye ar s 2- 5) 7. 1. 1. D ev el o p a c o m m u n ic at io n s tr at eg y fo r ad vo ca cy , l o b b yi n g a n d f ac ili ta ti o n in f av o r o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s u si n g a ll av ai la b le c h an n el s (r ad io , T V, in te rn et … ) at a ll le ve ls , m o b ili ze r es o u rc es a n d im p le m en t (y ea rs 2 -5 ) 7. 1. 2. Fa ci lit at e th e es ta b lis h m en t o f lin ka g es o f fa rm er s to p ro vi d er s o f fa ci lit at io n f ac to rs ( tr ad er s, m ar ke t in fo rm at io n s o u rc es , i n p u t su p p lie rs , m ic ro -c re d it in st it u ti o n s, ir ri g at io n … ) (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 7. 1. 3. D ev el o p a c le ar s tr at eg y o n s u b si d ie s fo r fa rm er s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) 8. 1. 1. C o n d u ct a s tu d y to id en ti fy a n d p ri o ri ti ze c ro ss c u tt in g is su es in a g ri cu lt u re a n d li ve st o ck e xt en si o n s er vi ce s sp ec ifi c to S o u th er n S u d an ( ye ar 1 ) 8. 1. 2. D ev el o p c ap ac it y th ro u g h t h e tr ai n in g o f ES Ps o n c ro ss -c u tt in g is su es id en ti fi ed a n d w ay s to a d d re ss it ( ye ar s 2- 5) 8. 1. 3. In st it u te a y ea rl y n at io n al c o n fe re n ce a n d f o llo w -u p m ee ti n g s at S ta te , C o u n ty a n d P ay am o n t h e p ro m o ti o n a n d m ai n st re am in g o f cr o ss c u tt in g is su es in ex te n si o n p ro g ra m m es ( ye ar 1 ) 9. 1. 1. O rg an iz e a st u d y to d el in ea te a re as o f in te rv en ti o n f o r p ri va te a n d p u b lic e xt en si o n s er vi ce s (y ea r 1) 51 N ar ra ti ve S u m m ar y O b je ct iv el y V er ifi ab le In d ic at o rs M ea n s o f V er ifi ca ti o n A ss u m p ti o n s 9. 1. 2. D ev el o p a n d e st ab lis h a s u st ai n ab le f u n d in g m ec h an is m in f av o u r o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s, b as ed o n t h e re su lt s an d r ec o m m en d at io n s o f th e st u d y (y ea rs 2 -3 ) 9. 1. 3. In it ia te a n d e st ab lis h a d o n o r co o rd in at io n m ee ti n g t o m o b ili ze fi n an ci al s u p p o rt f o r a co o rd in at ed e xt en si o n s er vi ce d el iv er y (y ea r 1) 10 .1 .1 . D ev el o p a s tr at eg ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n a n d e d u ca ti o n a t G o ss a n d S ta te le ve ls ( ye ar s 1- 2) 10 .1 .2 . M o b ili ze r es o u rc es n ec es sa ry f o r th e im p le m en ta ti o n o f a st ra te g ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n a n d e d u ca ti o n a t G o ss a n d S ta te le ve ls , a n d im p le m en t (y ea rs 2 -5 ) 10 .1 .3 . Su p p o rt e xi st in g t ra in in g in st it u ti o n s an d o th er e d u ca ti o n al f ac ili ti es t o c ar ry o u t ad ap ti ve r es ea rc h w it h o n -f ar m t ri al s an d o n -s ta ti o n r es ea rc h ( ye ar s 2- 5) 52 A n n ex 3 : Th e O p er at io n al P la n T ab le Sp ec ifi c O b je ct iv es R es u lt s A ct iv it ie s K ey Im p le m en ti n g A ct o rs In d ic at iv e B u d g et (U SD ) Ti m el in e 1. To c re at e a fa vo ra b le an d e n ab lin g en vi ro n m en t fo r q u al it y an d e ff ec ti ve e xt en si o n se rv ic es t o a b ro ad cl ie n te le a t al l l ev el s It s h o u ld in cl u d e, a t al l le ve ls , t h e in vo lv em en t o f al l s ta ke h o ld er s in e xt en si o n se rv ic e p ro vi si o n , a n d b e at tr ac ti ve f o r th e p ri va te an d n o n s ta te a ct o rs ( N SA ) to p ar ti ci p at e in t h e d el iv er y o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s an d th e co m m er ci al iz at io n o f ag ri cu lt u re 1. a. Th e N A LE P is en d o rs ed a t th e h ig h es t p o ss ib le le ve l o f th e G o SS w it h in o n e ye ar a. 1. 1. 1. P re se n t th e N A LE P, it s Im p le m en ta ti o n a n d R eg u la to ry F ra m ew o rk s to t h e C o u n ci l o f M in is te rs t h ro u g h M A F an d M A R F (y ea r 1) N A LE P Ta sk F or ce , M A F an d M A RF 10 ,0 00 Ju ly 2 01 2 1. 1. 2. A llo ca te a n d m o b ili ze a p p ro p ri at e re so u rc es f o r th e im p le m en ta ti o n o f N A LE P at a ll le ve ls ( ye ar s 1- 5) M A F an d M A RF , S ta te s 25 ,7 00 Ju ly 2 01 6 b . N A LE P is a d o p te d b y St at es a n d im p le m en te d a t al l le ve ls s ta rt in g s ec o n d ye ar 1. 2. 1. L au n ch a n d d is se m in at e th e N A LE P to t h e St at es (y ea r 1) M A F, M A RF , S ta te s 15 0, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 2 1. 2. 2. I m p le m en t th e re fo rm o f ex te n si o n o rg an iz at io n an d m an ag em en t st ru ct u re s at G o SS , S ta te a n d C o u n ty le ve ls ( ye ar s 2- 5) M A F, M A RF , S ta te s 82 ,8 00 Ju ly 2 01 6 c. In te rn at io n al p ar tn er sh ip s ar e b u ilt a ro u n d N A LE P in s u p p o rt o f it s im p le m en ta ti o n st ar ti n g fi rs t ye ar 1. 3. 1. I n it ia te a n d f o rm al iz e as m an y in te rn at io n al p ar tn er sh ip s as p o ss ib le a ro u n d t h e N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n f ra m ew o rk , i n cl u d in g w it h t h e im p le m en ta ti o n p ro ce ss o f th e C o m p re h en si ve A fr ic a A g ri cu lt u re D ev el o p m en t Pr o g ra m m e (C A A D P) ( ye ar s 1- 5) M A F an d M A RF , a nd in te rn at io na l p ar tn er s 10 2, 80 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 53 Sp ec ifi c O b je ct iv es R es u lt s A ct iv it ie s K ey Im p le m en ti n g A ct o rs In d ic at iv e B u d g et (U SD ) Ti m el in e 2. To p ro vi d e a q u al it y an d e ff ec ti ve e xt en si o n se rv ic e to a b ro ad cl ie n te le a t al l l ev el s 1. 1. 1. 1. d . R an g e o f ap p ro p ri at e an d n ee d s- b as ed ex te n si o n s er vi ce s ar e d el iv er ed t o a b ro ad ra n g e o f cl ie n te le st ar ti n g s ec o n d y ea r a. a. a. a. 2. 1. 1. D ev el o p g en d er s en si ti ve n o rm s, s ta n d ar d s, g u id el in es a n d a s ys te m o f re g is tr at io n f o r ES Ps (y ea rs 1 -2 ) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n 10 ,1 75 Ju ly 2 01 3 2. 1. 2. C o n d u ct f ar m er s’ in fo rm at io n n ee d s as se ss m en t at a ll le ve ls ( FI N A ) (y ea rs 1 -2 ) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n, N G O s 10 1, 75 0 Ju ly 2 01 3 2. 1. 3. P la n a n d im p le m en t ex te n si o n p ro g ra m m es b as ed o n F IN A ( ye ar s 2- 5) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n, S ta te m in is tr ie s of ag ric ul tu re , l iv es to ck an d fo re st ry , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 41 ,4 00 Ju ly 2 01 6 2. 1. 4. E st ab lis h m u lt i l at er al a n d b i l at er al p ar tn er sh ip s to h ar m o n iz e an d c o o rd in at e th e d el iv er y o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, Pa rt ne rs … 25 ,7 00 Ju ly 2 01 6 2. 1. 5. F ac ili ta te t h e im p le m en ta ti o n o f N A LE P th ro u g h in cr ea se d r es o u rc es f o r ex te n si o n ( ye ar s 1- 5) St at e m in is tr ie s of ag ric ul tu re , l iv es to ck an d fo re st ry , 25 ,7 00 Ju ly 2 01 6 54 Sp ec ifi c O b je ct iv es R es u lt s A ct iv it ie s K ey Im p le m en ti n g A ct o rs In d ic at iv e B u d g et Ti m el in e 3. To p ro m o te a w id e ra n g e o f p ar ti ci p at o ry ex te n si o n ap p ro ac h es a n d m et h o d s 1. e. R el ev an t an d ap p ro p ri at e ex te n si o n ap p ro ac h es , m et h o d s an d g u id el in es a re d ev el o p ed a n d d o cu m en te d st ar ti n g fi rs t ye ar , an d d is se m in at ed st ar ti n g s ec o n d ye ar a. 3. 1. 1. C re at e (y ea r 1) a n d s u st ai n a d at ab as e o f ap p ro p ri at e d o cu m en ts o n p ar ti ci p at o ry ex te n si o n a p p ro ac h es a n d m et h o d s (y ea rs 1- 5) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n 20 3, 50 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 3. 1. 2. I d en ti fy , t es t, a d ap t an d u p sc al e re le va n t p ar ti ci p at o ry e xt en si o n a p p ro ac h es a n d m et h o d s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n, Re se ar ch c en te rs , U ni ve rs iti es 77 1, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 3. 1. 3. D ev el o p a p p ro p ri at e ex te n si o n p ac ka g es an d m es sa g es b as ed o n a g ro e co lo g ic al an d s o ci o -e co n o m ic s it u at io n s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) M A F, M A RF , N SA s, a nd p ro fe ss io na l w or ki ng g ro up s 56 4, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 4. To e m p o w er ru ra l h o u se h o ld s an d t h ei r in st it u ti o n s fo r th e u se o f ap p ro p ri at e ru ra l s er vi ce s an d t h e ad o p ti o n o f ap p ro p ri at e ex te n si o n m es sa g es 1. 1. 1. f. R u ra l H o u se h o ld s h av e ac ce ss to im p ro ve d sk ill s, t o o ls a n d te ch n iq u es f o r th ei r ad o p ti o n an d u se s ta rt in g th ir d y ea r a. a. a. 4. 1. 1. F ac ili ta te t h e fo rm at io n o f g ro u p s an d as so ci at io n s fo r ea sy a cc es s to e xt en si o n se rv ic es , i n p u ts a n d t ec h n o lo g ie s (y ea rs 1- 5) St at e m in is tr ie s of a gr ic ul tu re , l iv es to ck an d fo re st ry , P ub lic E SP s, N G O S, N SA s, Pa rt ne rs … 10 2, 80 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 4. 1. 2. I n cr ea se w o m en r ep re se n ta ti o n in a ll ex te n si o n a ct iv it ie s at a ll le ve ls t o b et te r re ac h f em al e fa rm er s an d w o m en -h ea d ed h o u se h o ld s (y ea rs 1 -5 ) St at e m in is tr ie s of a gr ic ul tu re , l iv es to ck an d fo re st ry , P ub lic E SP s, N G O S, N SA s, Pa rt ne rs … 12 8, 50 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 4. 1. 3. P ro vi d e n ee d s- b as ed t ra in in g a n d a d vi ce to E SP s an d c lie n te le u si n g d if fe re n t ap p ro ac h es , i n cl u d in g F FS ( ye ar s 1- 5) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n, St at e m in is tr ie s of a gr ic ul tu re , l iv es to ck a nd fo re st ry , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 25 7, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 4. 1. 4. D is se m in at e ex te n si o n p ac ka g es u si n g c o st ef fe ct iv e m et h o d s an d a p p ro ac h es ( ye ar s 2- 5) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n, St at e m in is tr ie s of a gr ic ul tu re , l iv es to ck a nd fo re st ry , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 10 3, 50 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 4. 1. 5. E st ab lis h f ar m er s in fo rm at io n c en te rs a t Pa ya m le ve l ( ye ar s 2- 5) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n, St at e m in is tr ie s of a gr ic ul tu re , l iv es to ck a nd fo re st ry , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 15 ,5 25 ,0 00 Ju ly 2 01 6 55 Sp ec ifi c O b je ct iv es R es u lt s A ct iv it ie s K ey Im p le m en ti n g A ct o rs In d ic at iv e B u d g et Ti m el in e 5. To s tr en g th en st ak eh o ld er s lin ka g es , a n d th e co o rd in at io n an d n et w o rk in g am o n g E SP s at al l l ev el s 1. 1. 5. 1. T h e se tu p o f in st it u ti o n al ar ra n g em en ts fo r th e im p le m en ta ti o n o f th e N A LE P is fu n ct io n al a t al l le ve ls s ta rt in g se co n d y ea r a. a. 5. 1. 1. D ev el o p T o R a n d im p le m en ta ti o n g u id el in es f o r th e N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n co m m it te e, f o ra a n d p ro fe ss io n al w o rk in g g ro u p s (y ea r 1) M A F an d M A RF , N G O S, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 30 ,0 00 Ju ly 2 01 2 5. 1. 2. E st ab lis h N A LE P im p le m en ta ti o n co m m it te e at G o SS le ve l ( ye ar s 1- 5) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n, St at e m in is tr ie s of a gr ic ul tu re , l iv es to ck a nd fo re st ry , N G O S, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 25 7, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 2 5. 1. 3. E st ab lis h p ro fe ss io n al s w o rk in g g ro u p s at n at io n al a n d S ta te le ve ls s ta rt in g ( ye ar s 1- 5) M A F an d M A RF D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n, St at e m in is tr ie s of a gr ic ul tu re , l iv es to ck a nd fo re st ry , N G O S, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 30 8, 40 0 Ju ly 2 01 2 5. 1. 4. E st ab lis h N A LE P ag ri cu lt u re a n d li ve st o ck st ak eh o ld er f o ra a t al l l ev el s st ar ti n g (y ea rs 1 -5 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 56 4, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 2 6. To d ev el o p a n d st re n g th en h u m an a n d in st it u ti o n al ca p ac it y o f ex te n si o n se rv ic e p ro vi d er s at a ll le ve ls in cl u d in g tr ai n in g in st it u ti o n s, f o r a m o re e ff ec ti ve te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d t ra n sf er (T D T) Th e in st it u ti o n al ca p ac it y st re n g th en in g s h o u ld ai m a t p ro m o ti n g ef fe ct iv e re se ar ch - ex te n si o n -u se r p ar tn er sh ip a n d lin ka g es in T D T g . C ap ac it y o f tr ai n in g in st it u ti o n s is st re n g th en ed st ar ti n g s ec o n d ye ar a. 6. 1. 1. U p d at e an d im p le m en t tr ai n in g cu rr ic u lu m o f tr ai n in g c en te rs a n d in st it u te s o f M A F an d M A R F st ar ti n g ( ye ar 1- 5) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 15 3, 50 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 6. 1. 2. R eh ab ili ta te in fr as tr u ct u re s an d p ro vi d e ad eq u at e re so u rc es s ta rt in g ( ye ar s 1- 2) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , S ta te s an d Pa rt ne rs … 10 1, 75 0 Ju ly 2 01 3 h . C ap ac it y o f h u m an r es o u rc es is s tr en g th en ed a t al l l ev el s st ar ti n g se co n d y ea r a. a. 6. 2. 1. D ev el o p m in im u m s ta ffi n g le ve ls w it h m in im u m q u al ifi ca ti o n a n d e xp er ie n ce re q u ir ed f o r ES Ps w it h in ( ye ar 1 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 20 ,0 00 Ju ly 2 01 2 6. 2. 2. A ss es s tr ai n in g n ee d s o f ES Ps , i n cl u d in g st at e an d N SA s at a ll le ve ls w it h in y ea r (y ea rs 1 -2 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 10 1, 75 0 Ju ly 2 01 3 6. 2. 3. I d en ti fy a n d t ra in E SP s ac co rd in g t o n ee d s id en ti fi ed ( ye ar s 2- 5) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 20 7, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 56 Sp ec ifi c O b je ct iv es R es u lt s A ct iv it ie s K ey Im p le m en ti n g A ct o rs In d ic at iv e B u d g et Ti m el in e 7. To p ro m o te th e p ro vi si o n o f fa ci lit at in g fa ct o rs f o r ef fe ct iv e ex te n si o n se rv ic e d el iv er y 1. i. Su p p o rt f o r ex te n si o n fa ci lit at io n f ac to rs (m ar ke ts , i n p u ts , cr ed it f ac ili ti es , in fr as tr u ct u re s, ir ri g at io n f ac ili ti es , su b si d ie s… ) is in cr ea se d s ta rt in g se co n d y ea r a. 7. 1. 1. D ev el o p a c o m m u n ic at io n s tr at eg y fo r ad vo ca cy , l o b b yi n g a n d f ac ili ta ti o n in fa vo r o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce s u si n g a ll av ai la b le c h an n el s (r ad io , T V, in te rn et … ) at a ll le ve ls , m o b ili ze r es o u rc es a n d im p le m en t (y ea rs 2 - 5 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 14 4, 90 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 7. 1. 2. F ac ili ta te t h e es ta b lis h m en t o f lin ka g es o f fa rm er s to p ro vi d er s o f fa ci lit at io n f ac to rs (t ra d er s, m ar ke t in fo rm at io n s o u rc es , in p u t su p p lie rs , m ic ro -c re d it in st it u ti o n s, ir ri g at io n … ) (y ea rs 1 -5 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , S ta te s, N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 10 2, 80 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 7. 1. 3. D ev el o p a c le ar s tr at eg y o n s u b si d ie s fo r fa rm er s (y ea rs 1 -2 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 10 1, 75 0 Ju ly 2 01 3 8. To p ro m o te a n d m ai n st re am cr o ss cu tt in g is su es in ag ri cu lt u re an d li ve st o ck ex te n si o n se rv ic es j. Th e p ro m o ti o n o f cr o ss c u tt in g is su es is e n h an ce d an d m ai n st re am ed in a ll ex te n si o n p ro g ra m m es st ar ti n g fi rs t ye ar a. a. 8. 1. 1. C o n d u ct a s tu d y to id en ti fy a n d p ri o ri ti ze cr o ss c u tt in g is su es in a g ri cu lt u re a n d liv es to ck e xt en si o n s er vi ce s sp ec ifi c to So u th er n S u d an ( ye ar 1 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 10 0, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 2 8. 1. 2. D ev el o p c ap ac it y th ro u g h t h e tr ai n in g o f ES Ps o n c ro ss -c u tt in g is su es id en ti fi ed a n d w ay s to a d d re ss it ( ye ar s 2- 5) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 20 7, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 8. 1. 3. In st it u te a y ea rl y n at io n al c o n fe re n ce an d f o llo w -u p m ee ti n g s at S ta te , C o u n ty an d P ay am o n t h e p ro m o ti o n a n d m ai n st re am in g o f cr o ss c u tt in g is su es in ex te n si o n p ro g ra m m es ( ye ar 1 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , N G O s, N SA s, P ar tn er s… 10 0, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 2 9. To d ev el o p a n ef fe ct iv e an d su st ai n ab le fu n d in g m ec h an is m in f av o u r o f te ch n o lo g y d ev el o p m en t an d r u ra l ex te n si o n 1. 1. k. Fu n d in g o f ex te n si o n s er vi ce d el iv er y is sh ar ed b et w ee n th e p u b lic , p ri va te , N SA s an d t h e fa rm er s th em se lv es st ar ti n g s ec o n d ye ar a. a. 9. 1. 1. O rg an iz e a st u d y to d el in ea te a re as o f in te rv en ti o n f o r p ri va te a n d p u b lic ex te n si o n s er vi ce s (y ea r 1) M A F an d M A RF a nd P ar tn er s 10 0, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 2 9. 1. 2. D ev el o p a n d e st ab lis h a s u st ai n ab le fu n d in g m ec h an is m in f av o u r o f ex te n si o n se rv ic es , b as ed o n t h e re su lt s an d re co m m en d at io n s o f th e st u d y (y ea rs 2 -3 ) M A F an d M A RF a nd P ar tn er s 20 7, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 4 9. 1. 3. I n it ia te a n d e st ab lis h a d o n o r co o rd in at io n m ee ti n g t o m o b ili ze fi n an ci al s u p p o rt f o r a co o rd in at ed e xt en si o n s er vi ce d el iv er y (y ea r 1) M A F an d M A RF 10 ,3 50 Ju ly 2 01 2 57 Sp ec ifi c O b je ct iv es R es u lt s A ct iv it ie s K ey Im p le m en ti n g A ct o rs In d ic at iv e B u d g et Ti m el in e 10 . D ev el o p a n ef fe ct iv e re se ar ch - ex te n si o n – u se r p ar tn er sh ip a n d lin ka g es t h at w ill f ac ili ta te a re se ar ch s ys te m re sp o n si ve t o fa rm er s n ee d s 10 .1 . A s tr at eg ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l re se ar ch , ex te n si o n a n d ed u ca ti o n a re d ev el o p ed f o r G o SS a n d S ta te le ve ls s ta rt in g se co n d y ea r 10 .1 .1 . D ev el o p a s tr at eg ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , e xt en si o n an d e d u ca ti o n a t G o ss a n d S ta te le ve ls (y ea rs 1 -2 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , D ep ar tm en ts o f re se ar ch o f M A F an d M A RF , R es ea rc h ce nt er s, U ni ve rs iti es 30 5, 25 0 Ju ly 2 01 3 10 .1 .2 . M o b ili ze r es o u rc es n ec es sa ry f o r th e im p le m en ta ti o n o f a st ra te g ic a n d a n o p er at io n al p la n s fo r ag ri cu lt u ra l r es ea rc h , ex te n si o n a n d e d u ca ti o n a t G o ss a n d S ta te le ve ls , a n d im p le m en t (y ea rs 2 -5 ) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , D ep ar tm en ts o f re se ar ch o f M A F an d M A RF , R es ea rc h ce nt er s, U ni ve rs iti es 82 ,8 00 Ju ly 2 01 6 10 .1 .3 . Su p p o rt e xi st in g t ra in in g in st it u ti o n s an d o th er e d u ca ti o n al f ac ili ti es t o c ar ry o u t ad ap ti ve r es ea rc h w it h o n -f ar m t ri al s an d o n -s ta ti o n r es ea rc h ( ye ar s 2- 5) D ep ar tm en ts o f ex te ns io n of M A F an d M A RF , D ep ar tm en ts o f re se ar ch o f M A F an d M A RF , R es ea rc h ce nt er s, U ni ve rs iti es 6, 21 0, 00 0 Ju ly 2 01 6 58 Annex 4: Detailed Budget for NALEP implementation Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total A. General Costs A.1 GoSS level A.1.a Rehabilitation of infrastructures (year 1) 200.000 0 0 0 0 200.000 A.1.b Non expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 160,000 0 0 177,395 0 337,395 4WD Jeep 90,000 0 0 99,785 0 189,785 4WD Pick-up 70,000 0 0 77,610 0 147,610 Data processing equipments 30,000 0 0 33,262 0 63,262 Printing and reproduction materials 19,500 0 0 21,620 0 41,120 Big photocopier + accessories 6,000 0 0 6,652 0 12,652 Medium photocopier + accessories 6,000 0 0 6,652 0 12,652 Small photocopier + accessories 7,500 0 0 8,315 0 15,815 Office furniture (year 1) 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 Agricultural equipment for demonstration and adaptive trials 20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249 A.1.b Sub-total Non expendable procurement 379,500 20,700 21,425 254,451 22,950 699,026 A.1.c Expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Data processing supplies 15,000 15,525 16,068 16,631 17,213 80,437 Printing and reproduction supplies 20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249 Office stationery 25,000 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 134,062 Agricultural inputs for demonstration and adaptive trials 10,000 10,350 10,712 11,087 11,475 53,625 A.1.c Sub-total Expendable procurement 70,000 72,450 74,986 77,610 80,327 375,373 A.1.d Personnel 0 0 0 0 Salaries and salary supplements 240,000 248,400 257,094 266,092 275,406 1,286,992 Consultants 100,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 536,247 Other personnel costs 17,000 17,595 18,211 18,848 19,508 91,162 Sub-total A.1.d Personnel 357,000 369,495 382,427 395,812 409,666 1,914,400 A.1.e Contracts with ESPs 200,000 207,000 214,245 221,744 229,505 1,072,493 A.1.f Training 200,000 207,000 214,245 221,744 229,505 1,072,493 A.1.g Travels 0 0 0 0 Local travels 150,000 155,250 160,684 166,308 172,128 804,370 International travels 50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123 Sub-total A.1.g Travels 200,000 207,000 214,245 221,744 229,505 1,072,493 59 Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total A.1.h General operation expenses 0 0 0 0 Vehicles operation and maintenance 53,333 55,200 57,132 59,132 61,201 285,998 Vehicles insurance 3,200 3,312 3,428 3,548 3,672 17,160 Equipment operation and maintenance 10,000 10,350 10,712 11,087 11,475 53,625 Coordination Meetings 60,000 62,100 64,274 66,523 68,851 321,748 Miscellaneous 50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123 Sub-total A.1.h General operation expenses 176,533 182,712 189,107 195,726 202,576 946,654 Sub-total A.1 GoSS level 1,783,033 1,266,357 1,310,679 1.588.830 1.404.033 7.352.932 A.2 State level A.2.a Rehabilitation of infrastructures (year 1) 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 A.2.b Non expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 1,150,000 0 0 1,275,026 0 2,425,026 4WD Jeep 450,000 0 0 498,923 0 948,923 4WD Pick-up 700,000 0 0 776,103 0 1,476,103 Data processing equipments 60,000 0 0 66,523 0 126,523 Printing and reproduction materials 60,000 0 0 66,523 0 126,523 Big photocopier + accessories 30,000 0 0 33,262 0 63,262 Medium photocopier + accessories 15,000 0 0 16,631 0 31,631 Small photocopier + accessories 15,000 0 0 16,631 0 31,631 Office furniture (year 1) 750,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 Agricultural equipment for demonstration and adaptive trials 100,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 536,247 A.2.b Sub-total Non expendable procurement 2,120,000 103,500 107,123 1,518,943 114,752 3,964,318 A.2.c Expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Data processing supplies 75,000 77,625 80,342 83,154 86,064 402,185 Printing and reproduction supplies 100,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 536,247 Office stationery 125,000 129,375 133,903 138,590 143,440 670,308 Agricultural inputs for demonstration and adaptive trials 50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123 A.2.c Sub-total Expendable procurement 350,000 362,250 374,929 388,051 401,633 1,876,863 A.2.d Personnel 0 0 0 0 Salaries and salary supplements 600,000 621,000 642,735 665,231 688,514 3,217,480 Other personnel costs 30,000 31,050 32,137 33,262 34,426 160,874 A.2.d Sub-total Personnel 630,000 652,050 674,872 698,492 722,939 3,378,354 A.2.e Contracts with ESPs 500,000 517,500 535,613 554,359 573,762 2,681,233 A.2.f Training 500,000 517,500 535,613 554,359 573,762 2,681,233 A.2.g Travels 0 0 0 0 Local travels 500,000 517,500 535,613 554,359 573,762 2,681,233 A.2.g Sub-total Travels 500,000 517,500 535,613 554,359 573,762 2,681,233 A.2.h General operation expenses 0 0 0 0 Vehicles operation and maintenance 383,333 396,750 410,636 425,009 439,884 2,055,612 Vehicles insurance 23,000 23,805 24,638 25,501 26,393 123,337 Equipment operation and maintenance 20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249 Coordination Meetings 240,000 248,400 257,094 266,092 275,406 1,286,992 Miscellaneous 200,000 207,000 214,245 221,744 229,505 1,072,493 A.2.h Sub-total General operation expenses 866,333 896,655 928,038 960,519 994,137 4,645,683 Sub-total A.2 State level 6,466,333 3,566,955 3,691,798 5,229,083 3,954,747 22,908,917 A.3 County level (including all levels below) 60 Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total A.3.a Rehabilitation of infrastructures (year 1) 3,950,000 0 0 0 0 3,950,000 A.3.b Non expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 3,764,300 0 0 4,173,547 0 7,937,847 4WD pick-up hard top 2,765,000 0 0 3,065,605 0 5,830,605 Motorbikes 948,000 0 0 1,051,065 0 1,999,065 Bicycles for Payams 51,300 0 0 56,877 0 108,177 Data processing equipments 474,000 0 0 525,532 0 999,532 Printing and reproduction materials 59,250 0 0 65,692 0 124,942 Small photocopier + accessories 59,250 0 0 65,692 0 124,942 Office furniture (year 1) 493,750 0 0 0 0 493,750 Agricultural equipment for demonstration and adaptive trials 197,500 204,413 211,567 218,972 226,636 1,059,087 A.3.b Sub-total Non expendable procurement 4,988,800 204,413 211,567 4,983,742 226,636 10,615,158 A.3.c Expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Data processing supplies 197,500 204,413 211,567 218,972 226,636 1,059,087 Printing and reproduction supplies 395,000 408,825 423,134 437,944 453,272 2,118,174 Office stationery 493,750 511,031 528,917 547,429 566,589 2,647,718 Agricultural inputs for demonstration and adaptive trials 197,500 204,413 211,567 218,972 226,636 1,059,087 A.3.c Sub-total Expendable procurement 1,283,750 1,328,681 1,375,185 1,423,317 1,473,133 6,884,066 A.3.d Personnel 0 0 0 0 Salaries and salary supplements 4,740,000 4,905,900 5,077,607 5,255,323 5,439,259 25,418,088 Other personnel costs 79,000 81,765 84,627 87,589 90,654 423,635 A.3.d Sub-total Personnel 4,819,000 4,987,665 5,162,233 5,342,911 5,529,913 25,841,723 A.3.e Contracts with ESPs 790,000 817,650 846,268 875,887 906,543 4,236,348 A.3.f Training 790,000 817,650 846,268 875,887 906,543 4,236,348 A.3.g Travels 0 0 0 0 Local travels 948,000 981,180 1,015,521 1,051,065 1,087,852 5,083,618 A.3.g Sub-total Travels 948,000 981,180 1,015,521 1,051,065 1,087,852 5,083,618 A.3.h General operation expenses 0 0 0 0 Vehicles operation and maintenance 1,254,767 1,298,684 1,344,137 1,391,182 1,439,874 6,728,643 Vehicles insurance 75,286 77,921 80,648 83,471 86,392 403,719 Equipment operation and maintenance 158,000 163,530 169,254 175,177 181,309 847,270 Coordination Meetings 948,000 981,180 1,015,521 1,051,065 1,087,852 5,083,618 Miscellaneous 790,000 817,650 846,268 875,887 906,543 4,236,348 A.3.h Sub-total General operation expenses 3,226,053 3,338,965 3,455,828 3,576,782 3,701,970 17,299,597 Sub-total A.3 County level (including all levels below) 20,795,603 12,476,203 12,912,870 18,129,591 13,832,590 78,146,857 Sub-total A General Costs 29,044,969 17,309,515 17,915,348 24,947,504 19,191,369 108,408,706 B. Specific Operational Costs for Activities 1.1.1. Present the NALEP, its Implementation and Regulatory … (year 1) 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000 1.1.2. Allocate and mobilize appropriate resources for the … (years 1-5) 5,000 5,175 5,356 5,544 5,738 26,812 1.2.1. Launch and disseminate the NALEP to the States (year 1) 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000 1.2.2. Implement the reform of extension organization … (years 2-5) 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 87,249 61 Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total 1.3.1. Initiate and formalize as many int. partnerships … (years 1-5) 20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249 Sub-total Specific objective 1 185,000 46,575 48,205 49,892 51,639 381,311 2.1.1. Develop gender sensitive norms, standards … (years 1-2) 5,000 5,175 0 0 0 10,175 2.1.2. Conduct farmers’ information needs… (years 1-2) 50,000 51,750 0 0 0 101,750 2.1.3. Plan and implement extension programmes… (years 2-5) 10,350 10,712 11,087 11,475 43,625 2.1.4. Establish multi lateral and bi lateral partnerships … (years 1-5) 5,000 5,175 5,356 5,544 5,738 26,812 2.1.5. Facilitate the implementation of NALEP … (years 1-5) 5,000 5,175 5,356 5,544 5,738 26,812 Sub-total Specific objective 2 65,000 77,625 21,425 22,174 22,950 209,174 3.1.1. Create (year 1) and sustain a database … (years 1-5) 100,000 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 209,062 3.1.2. Identify, test, adapt and upscale relevant … (years 1-5) 150,000 155,250 160,684 166,308 172,128 804,370 3.1.3. Develop appropriate extension packages… (years 1-5) 150,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 586,247 Sub-total Specific objective 3 530,000 439,875 337,436 349,246 361,470 2,018,027 4.1.1. Facilitate the formation of groups and associations … (years 1-5) 20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249 4.1.2. Increase women representation in all … (years 1-5) 25,000 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 134,062 4.1.3. Provide needs-based training and advice to ESPs… (years 1-5) 50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123 4.1.4. Disseminate extension packages using … (years 2-5) 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 109,062 4.1.5. Establish farmers information centers… (years 2-5) 3,881,250 4,017,094 4,157,692 4,303,211 16,359,247 Sub-total Specific objective 4 95,000 4,005,450 4,145,641 4,290,738 4,440,914 16,977,743 5.1.1. Develop ToR and implementation guidelines… (year 1) 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000 5.1.2. Establish NALEP implementation… (years 1-5) 50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123 5.1.3. Establish professionals working groups … (years 1-5) 60,000 62,100 64,274 66,523 68,851 321,748 5.1.4. Establish NALEP agriculture and … (years 1-5) 150,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 586,247 Sub-total Specific objective 5 290,000 217,350 224,957 232,831 240,980 1,206,118 6.1.1. Update and implement training curriculum… (year 1-5) 50,000 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 159,062 6.1.2. Rehabilitate infrastructures and provide … (years 1-2) 50,000 51,750 0 0 0 101,750 6.2.1. Develop minimum staffing levels with … (year 1) 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 6.2.2. Assess training needs of ESPs, including… (years 1-2) 50,000 51,750 0 0 0 101,750 6.2.3. Identify and train ESPs according to… (years 2-5) 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 218,123 Sub-total Specific objective 6 170,000 181,125 80,342 83,154 86,064 600,685 7.1.1. Develop a communication strategy for… (years 2 - 5) 51,750 32,137 33,262 34,426 151,574 62 Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total 7.1.2. Facilitate the establishment of linkages… (years 1-5) 20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249 7.1.3. Develop a clear strategy on subsidies… (years 1-2) 50,000 51,750 0 0 0 101,750 Sub-total Specific objective 7 70,000 124,200 53,561 55,436 57,376 360,573 8.1.1. Conduct a study to identify and prioritize… (year 1) 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 8.1.2. Develop capacity through the training of ESPs… (years 2-5) 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 218,123 8.1.3. Institute a yearly national conference… (year 1) 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Sub-total Specific objective 8 200,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 418,123 9.1.1. Organize a study to delineate areas of... (year 1) 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 9.1.2. Develop and establish a sustainable funding… (years 2-3) 103,500 107,123 0 0 210,623 9.1.3. Initiate and establish donor coordination… (year 1) 10,350 0 0 0 10,350 Sub-total Specific objective 9 100,000 113,850 107,123 0 0 320,973 10.1.1. Develop a strategic and an operational… (years 1-2) 150,000 155,250 0 0 0 305,250 10.1.2. Mobilize resources necessary for… (years 2-5) 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 87,249 10.1.3 Support existing training institutions... (years 2-5) 1,552,500 1,606,838 1,663,077 1,721,285 6,543,699 Sub-total Specific objective 10 150,000 1,728,450 1,628,262 1,685,251 1,744,235 6,936,198 Sub-total B Specific Operational Costs for Activities 1,855,000 6,986,250 6,700,512 6,824,159 7,063,004 29,428,925 C Grand Total 30,899,969 24,295,765 24,615,861 31,771,663 26,254,373 137,837,631 1 Takes into account gender issues of the NALEP statement n° 7