Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan of the Ministry of Agriculture

Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Ministry of Agriculture Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh iii Abbreviations ix Message by the Minister xiii Message by the Agriculture Secretary xiv Executive Summary xv 1. Background, Scope and Outline 1 1.1 Background, scope and objectives 1 1.2 Outline of the Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 3 2. Situational Assessment 5 2.1 Role of Agriculture in Bangladesh Economy 5 2.2 Rank of Bangladesh Agriculture in the World 5 2.3 Current State of Agriculture in Bangladesh 9 2.4 Major constrains for agriculture development in Bangladesh 22 2.5 Government Measures to Support agriculture 24 2.6 PEST (Political-Economic-Social-Technological) Context 25 2.7 SWOT (Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats) Analysis 34 2.8 Multi-stakeholders' analysis 36 3. Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate and Development Issues and Challenges 39 3.1 Organizational Structure of the Ministry of Agriculture 39 3.2 Functions of the Ministry of Agriculture 44 3.3 Legal Mandate and Citizens Charter 45 3.4 Policy and Regulatory Framework 47 3.5 Interrelations of policies of the Ministry of Agriculture with national planning and policies 49 3.6 Major development issues and challenges 52 3.7 Inter-ministry and intra-ministry cross-cutting issues and Co-ordination 55 4. Strategic Objectives and Ministry Level Performance indicators 57 4.1 Vision, Mission, Core Values/Driving Principles of the Ministry of Agriculture 57 4.2 Medium Term Strategic Objectives and Desirable Actions 58 4.3 Linking Strategies with Policies 60 Contents Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan iv 4.4 Ministry-level Performance Indicators 61 4.5 Past trends of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 62 4.6 Projections of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 65 4.7 Food-grains Requirements for Food security 66 5. Programs/Projects and Financing Needs 71 5.1 Identification of Programs/Projects/Activities and Linkages with Policies 71 5.2 Prioritization of Programs/Projects/Activities 73 5.3 Policy choices for implementation of Programs/Projects/Activities and sources of financing 74 5.4 Annual Business Plan for Projects (Department/Agency wise medium term costing of development projects) 74 5.5 Trends of Agriculture Ministry budget, Actual Expenditure and Medium Term Costing of Development and Non-development 74 6. Annual Performance Plan 81 6.1 Agency/Department-wise dominant performance parameters for Programs/Projects/Activities with baseline and yearly targets for five years 81 6.2 Broad procurement plan for five years 81 7. Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism and Methodology 85 7.1 Monitoring and evaluation system and mechanism 85 7.2 Monitoring and evaluation technique 87 7.3 Concluding observation 88 Annexes 89 References 225 Contents v Tables Table 2.1 Ranks of Various Parameters Relating to Bangladesh Agriculture in the World 6 Table 2.2 Comparative Role of Agriculture in Bangladesh, SAARC and Selected Asian Economies - I 8 Table 2.3 Comparative Role of Agriculture in Bangladesh, SAARC and Selected Asian Economies - II 9 Table 2.4 Trends of Annual Real GDP Growth Rates and Share in Ovreall GDP of Agriculture 10 Table 2.5 Shares of Sub-sectors within Agriculture GDP 12 Table 2.6 Weights of Value Added of Crops in 2009-10 13 Table 2.7 Food grains Production 14 Table 2.8 Sectoral Distribution of Employment 15 Table 2.9 Agricultural Credit Disbursement, Recovery and Outstanding Balance 16 Table 2.10 Share of Agriculture subsidy 18 Table 2.11 Population Projections for the Years 2011 to 2051 28 Table 2.12 Trends of sectoral growth rates and shares since 1992 30 Table 2.13 Macroeconomic Scenario of Sixth Five Year Plan 32 Table 2.14 Projection of Agriculture Growth Rates and Shares in GDP during the Sixth Five Year Plan 32 Table 2.15 Nominal Wage Rate Indices (Base 1969-70=100) 33 Table 2.16 Yearly Average Consumer Price Index (CPI): Base 1995-96 =100 33 Table 2.17 Projected Pattern of Employment 34 Table 2.18 SWOT (Strengths-Weakness-Opportunities-Threats) Analysis for Agriculture 35 Table 2.19 Stakeholders Analysis for the Ministry of Agriculture 36 Table 3.1 Synthesis of Agriculture Ministry Policies 47 Table 3.2 Programs and Sub-Programs of the Country Investment Plan for Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition 56 Table 4.1 Major strategic objectives and desirable actions of the Ministry of Agriculture 59 Table 4.2 Linkages between strategic objectives and major policy documents of the Ministry of Agriculture 60 Table 4.3 Trends of total and net cropped area 63 Table 4.4 Long term trends of crops GDP at constant prices and List of Tables, Figures, Boxs and Annexes Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan vi selected agricultural inputs during 2010-11 64 Table 4.5 Projections of KPIs of the Ministry of Agriculture 65 Table 4.6 Average per capita per day food (grams) and calorie intake of a citizen of Bangladesh, 2010 67 Table 4.7 Food grain Production and Requirement 1971-72 to 2016-17 68 Table 4.8A Projected Demand for Rice in next five years 69 Table 4.8B Projected Demand for Wheat in next five years 69 Table 4.8C Projected Demand for Potato in next five years 69 Table 4.8D Projected Demand for Pulses in next five years 70 Table 5.1 Share of Agriculture Ministry budget during 2007-2011 75 Table 5.2 Ministry of agriculture budget and actual expenditure during 2007-2011 75 Table 5.3 Total Non-Development and Development costs over the medium term 76 Table 5.4 Department/Agency wise Medium Term costing of Development Projects 76 Table 5.5 Department/Agency wise Medium Term Non-Development Costs 78 Table 6.1 Year-wise projection and costing of irrigation machineries and other equipments 82 Table 6.2 Demand and use of different fertilizer from 2010-11 to 2011-12 and projections from 2012-13 to 201 4-15 83 Table 6.3 Plan for seed production/procurement and costing from 2012-13 to 2016-17 84 Table 7.1 Proposed marks (scores) for input/output/outcomes/KPIs for M&E 88 Table 7.2 Rating of an Agency or the Ministry on the basis of scores 88 Figures Figure 2.1 Trends of Annual growth rates of Agricultural value added 11 Figure 2.2 Share of Agriculture Sub-sectors in overall GDP 11 Figure 2.3 Budget allocation for Agriculture Subsidy from 1996-97 to 2012-13 19 Figure 2.4 Trends of sector growth rates in 1992-2011 31 Figure 2.5 Trends of sector shares in overall GDP in 1992-2011 31 Boxes Box 2.1 Pros and cons of agricultural subsidies 20 Contents vii Box 2.2 International practices of agricultural subsidies 21 Box 2.3 World Trade Organization and agriculture subsidies 22 Box 2.4 Trends of Poverty ratios 28 Box 2.5 Trends of income inequality (Gini Coefficient) 29 Box 2.6 Trends of expenditure inequality (Gini Coefficient) 30 Box 3.1 Organizational structure of the Ministry of Agriculture 43 Box 3.2 Organogram of the Ministry of Agriculture 44 Box 3.3 Functions of the Ministry of Agriculture 44 Box 3.4 List of Acts, law, Rules, Ordinance, Notification, Long term Policy, Resolution and Committees, Charter of Citizens of the Ministry of Agriculture 45 Box 3.5 Major Development Issues of Bangladesh Agriculture 54 Box 3.6 Major Challenges of Bangladesh Agriculture 54 Box 4.1 Key Performance Indicators of the ministry of Agriculture 61 Annexes Annex 1 Composition of Technical Committee to prepare MTSBP 90 Annex 2 Indices of Area and Production of Crops 91 Annex 3 Past trends of Agricultural inputs and outputs 94 Annex 4 Methodology for the projections of KPIs for the LMs 96 Annex 5 Ministry Level Medium Term Strategy 105 Annex 6 Annual Business Plan for Projects (Department/Agency wise Medium Term costing of Development Projects) 109 Annex 7 Department/Agency wise Annual Performance Plans 213 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan viii ix ADB Asian Development Bank ADP Annual Development Programme ADPRC ADP Review Committee AEZ Agro-Ecological Zone AIS Agricultural Information Services ATI Agricultural Training Institutes BADC Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation BANHRDB Bangladesh Applied Nutrition and HRD Board BARI Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute BARC Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council BARD Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development BBS Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics BC Budget Circular BEPZA Bangladesh Export Processing Zones Authority BHWDB Bangladesh Haors and Wetland Development Board BINA Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture BJMA Bangladesh Jute Mills Association BJRI Bangladesh Jute Research Institute BMB Budget Management Branch BMC Budget Management Committee BMD Bangladesh Meteorological Department BMDA Barind Multipurpose Development Authority BMRC Budget Monitoring and Resource Committee BRRI Bangladesh Rice Research Institute BSRI Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute BWG Budget Working Group CAO Chief Accounts Officer CCA Climate Change Adaptation CDB Cotton Development Board CFW Cash for Work CGA Controller General of Accounts CHT Chittagong Hill Tract CIP Country Investment Plan CPTU Central Procurement Technical Unit DAE Department of Agricultural Extension ABBREVIATIONS Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan DAM Department of Agricultural Marketing DLS Department of Livestock Services DMC Disaster Management Committees DMTBF Deepening Medium Term Budget Framework DOF Department of Fisheries DPEC Departmental Project Evaluation Committee DPP Development Project Proforma/Proposal DPR Detailed Project Report EAD External Affairs Division EC/ NEC Executive Committee of the National Economic Council EEC European Economic Community ERD Economic Relations Division EU European Union FABA Foreign Aid Budget Accounts FAO Food and Agriculture organization FD Finance Division FDI Foreign Direct Investment FFW Food for Work FM Finance Minister GAP Gap Analysis Program GED General Economics Division GFS Government Finance Statistics GoB Government of Bangladesh HIES Household Income and Expenditure Survey HIPC Highly Indebted Poor Country HPN Health, Population and Nutrition HR Human Resources HYV High Yielding Variety iBAS Integrated Budget and Accounting System IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ICOR Incremental Capital Output Ratio IDB Islamic Development Bank ICT Information and Communication Technology IDDP Intensive Dairy Development Program IFC International Finance Corporation IMED Implementation, Monitoring & Evaluation Division IMF International Monetary Fund x Abbreviations xi IPM Integrated Pest Management IRD Internal Resources Division IRRI International Rice Research Institute IT Information Technology KPI Key Performance Indicators LFS Labor Force Survey LMs Line Ministries M&E Monitoring & Evaluation MBF Ministry Budget Frameworks MDG Millennium Development Goals MEW Macroeconomic Wing MFI Micro Finance Institutions MIC Middle Income Country MIS Management Information System MOA Ministry of Agriculture MOF Ministry of Finance MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTBF Medium Term Budget Framework MTSBP Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan MW Mega Watt NAP National Agriculture Policy NEC National Economic Council NEP National Education Policy NGO Nongovernment Organization NIPMP National Integrated Pest Management Policy NSAPR National Strategy for Accelerated Poverty Reduction NSP National Seed Policy OECD Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation PC Planning Commission PD Programming Division PEC Program Evaluation Committee PEST Political-Economic-Social-Technology Analysis PFDS Public Food Distribution System PM Prime Minister PPP Purchasing Power Parity PW/C Planning Wing/ Cell PWD Public Works Department Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan RADP Revised Annual Development Programme R&D Research and Development RTPP Revised Technical Assistance Project Proforma SCA Seed Certification Agency SD Sector Division SEZ Special Economic Zone SP Strategic Plan SPEMP Strengthening Public Expenditure Management Programme SRDI Soil Resources Development Institute SRI System of Rice Intensification SFYP Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015) SMEs Small and Medium Enterprises SWOT Strength-Weakness-Opportunities-Threats Analysis SWAp Sector Wide Approach TA Technical Assistance TPP Technical Assistance Project Proforma/Proposal TYRIP Three Year Rolling Investment Plan USG Urea Super Granules VAT Value Added Tax VDP Village Development Party VGD Vulnerable Development Program VTE Vocational and Technical Education WARPO Water Resources Planning Organization WB World Bank WMIP Water Management Improvement Project WTO World Trade Organization xii xiii The Government has decided to prepare Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan (MTSBP) for strategic Ministries. I am delighted that the MTSBP for the Ministry of Agriculture has been prepared, covering the five-year period 2012-2013 to 2016-2017. In the environment of major structural change in the economy, agriculture today contributes about one-fifth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and provides employment to 48 percent of the labor force; 70 percent of the rural population directly or indirectly depends on agriculture for their livelihood. It remains the main source of raw material for the agro-based industry. Bangladesh has made significant stride in food production. A food-deficit country is now recognized for surplus in major staples but, we have no room for complacency. It would be our endeavor to explore areas to increase agricultural production and productivity. MTSBP is a step in this direction. In order to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of government expenditure, Agriculture Ministry has been preparing its annual budget under the Medium Term Budget Framework since FY 2005-2006. The process has established linkages between budget allocations and national and Ministry level policies, strategies and priorities. I believe the MTSBP would deepen the Medium Term Budgeting process by identifying appropriate programs, projects and activities and the related outcomes, outputs, physical inputs and financial resources. The MTSBP has documented the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats as well as major challenges and development issues in agriculture. It analyses the mission, vision, strategic objectives and core values of Agriculture Ministry and the programs, projects, activities and resource requirement to achieve them. It enables us to understand whether resources are being allocated in consistent with the policies and priorities of the Ministry, besides paving the way for further research on issues related to agricultural planning and development in our country. I extend my sincere thanks to the Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture for his guidance in preparing the MTSBP, and to the national and international consultants engaged in this project for sharing their experience. The co-operation of the Finance Division, Ministry of Finance, the Departments and Agencies under the Agriculture Ministry, and its officers have enriched the document. I thank all of them. Begum Matia Chowdhury Message xiv I am delighted to learn that the Ministry of Agriculture has completed preparation of Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan (MTSBP) as a part of Deepening Medium Term Budget Framework process. I am particularly happy to learn that the Ministry of Agriculture is the first amongst the Government Ministries/Division to have been chosen for preparing this document. The importance of the Agriculture sector in our social and economic advancement can't be over emphasized. It is one of the major contributor of our GDP and still responsible for creating nearly half of employment opportunities in rural Bangladesh. From food security and nutritional point of view, this sector ranked second to none. The Agriculture sector will continue to play pivotal role in stabilization of Bangladesh's socio-economic development progression. MTSPB should play an important role for sustaining development outcome of the sector by ensuring optimal use of available resources. Participatory process establishes ownership and credibility of such medium term strategic document, and facilitates its implementation. The MTSBP for the Agriculture sector has been prepared in broad participation and active support of all stakeholders directly involved in the development and management of the Agriculture sector. It has set an example how easily a complex process of planning and budgeting instruments can be put in best use to achieve our national development goals. I must recognize that involving wider stakeholders in its preparation would have been ideal; but time constraint didn't permit us to consult with the wider group. Let me take this opportunity to offer my sincere thanks for the valuable contribution of all the members of the "Technical Committees" in preparation of this milestone document. My colleagues in the Ministry of Agriculture, particularly the Policy Planning, Budget, Planning and Seed Wing, have worked diligently and relentlessly with the NARS and other agencies in bringing out this document. I must also thank the Ministry of Finance and DMTBF technical personnel for their guidance and invaluable support in finalizing the MTSBP. I hope that the MTSBP will help to guide the Government and our valued development partners in identifying specific projects/ programs and investment requirement for the agriculture sector in the medium term. It will also help improving efficacy of public investment in Agriculture sector in order to achieve our overarching national goal of eradicating poverty and hunger from Bangladesh. Any comments and suggestion for improvement of the document will be highly appreciated. Dr. S M Nazmul Islam Message xv Role of Agriculture in Bangladesh Economy In Bangladesh, as in all developing countries, agriculture1 plays a critical role in ensuring food security. It is a special sector as it has a universal role for providing food, a basic need for the survival of mankind. It also nurtures deeply cherished traditions, cultural heritage and social stability over time. But, agriculture sector is subject to high degree of risks caused by weather shocks, natural disaster and volatility of international prices of food and fertilizers. All these factors make medium and long term strategic business planning for agriculture all the more important given its sensitivity and implication in socio-economic progression of the developing countries. It is a very difficult as well and demands prudent and coherent thought process. Bangladesh with the seventh largest population size in the world and very high population density is basically an agrarian economy. Despite a declining trend of its share in overall gross domestic product (GDP) from 31.2 percent in 1985-86 to about 20 percent in 2010-11 mainly due to rapid expansion of industry and service sectors, agriculture remains the major source of income for the rural poor in Bangladesh. About 70 percent of the rural population and 48 percent of total labor force depend on agriculture and related farm and non-farm activities for their livelihood. Improvement in agricultural sector performance and sustaining its growth are critical from food security point of view as well as for reduction of rural poverty and unemployment. Recent Progress of Agriculture in Bangladesh Despite natural hazards, agriculture performance in the recent past has been satisfactory with significant acceleration of the growth rates in all sub-sectors. During the ast decade (2000-2010) agriculture registered an average growth rate of 3.6 percent per annum supported by a growth rate 3.5 percent by crops and horticulture, 3.1 percent by animal husbandry, 5.1 percent by forestry and 3 percent by fishery. Growth rates of crops and fishery have been volatile as these sub-sectors are affected most by weather shocks and natural disasters. Constraints for Agriculture Development Major constraints for agriculture development include the following: (a) Shrinking arable land (b) Declining soil health (c) Wide yield gap and regional variation of crop yields (d) Inadequate marketing facilities and post-harvest management (e) Impact of climate change and natural disaster Executive Summary 1 As per definitions under the United Nations System of National Accounts (UN-SNA), agriculture sector comprises crops, horticulture, floriculture, animal husbandry, fishing and forestry. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan (f) Imbalance use and inadequate availability of quality agricultural inputs (g) Lack of adequate resources for agriculture development (h) Inadequate price support policies (i) Fragmentation of land and small farm size (j) Insufficient investment for flood control and irrigation (k) Inadequate access to institutional agricultural credit Supportive Measures for Agriculture and Food Security Major supportive measures and incentives provided by the government to agricultural producers and consumers include the following: (a) Formulating 'National Agriculture Policy, 2013', Country Investment Plan (CIP) and other important policies, acts, laws, ordinance, rules and guidelines for agriculture development (b) Prices for important agricultural inputs, including fertilizer are subsidized (c) Production, preservation and distribution of quality seeds for various crops (d) Setting floor price (procurement prices) for crop production (e) Ensure access to agriculture credits at lower interest rate with simple procedure (f) Establishment of marketing clubs and growth centers for agriculture (g) Establishment of assemble centre for agricultural commodities and formation of co operative based marketing groups/association (h) Expand the agribusiness, processing and value addition activities (i) Develop effective value and supply chain linkage for different agricultural commodities (j) Conduct training for capacity development (k) Delivery of extension services for agriculture (l) Public distribution of food grains at subsidized prices (m) Agreement on establishment of 'SAARC Seed Bank' (n) Introduction of E-agriculture program (o) Master plan for developing agriculture across the coastal zone (p) Increasing public storage capacity and maintaining buffer stocks Major Development Issues and Challenges for Bangladesh Agriculture Major development issues and challenges facing Bangladesh agriculture include the following: First is the issue of augmenting investment in agriculture and rural infrastructure. Second, given the vicissitudes caused by weather shocks, there is an urgent need to bring more area under irrigation. xvi Executive Summary Third, appropriate measures are required to gradually move away from the subsidy based regime to a more productive and competitive agriculture system. Fourth, to reduce dependence on imports of food items like pulses, edible oils etc. Fifth, agricultural diversification and commercialization is called for to increase farm income and of agricultural laborers for faster reduction of rural poverty. Sixth, propelling growth of non-cereal food products to address the issue of unbalanced diet, particularly of the poor. Seventh, adoption of appropriate policies to dampen effect on agricultural prices arising out of volatility of international prices of food items and fertilizers. Eighth, appropriate strategies to meet the growing demand for food as a result of population growth and rapid urbanization. Vision, Mission and Core Values The Ministry of Agriculture has a Vision to achieve self-sufficiency in food grains production and a Mission to ensure food security for all citizens by increasing production and productivity in crop sector. They have the requisite core values and are guided by the desirable principles to achieve the stated Vision and Mission. Performance Indicators The Ministry of Agriculture is primarily concerned with the development of crops within agriculture sector. MBF deals with key performance indicators (KPI) which are indicators of outputs/outcomes resulting from the projects/programs/activities because in budgeting we are interested to judge the performance of given expenditure, irrespective of the composition of physical inputs. But, in MTSBP we are also interested in examining the availability and utilization of inputs and to judge their productivity and efficiency. Besides, in many cases it may be difficult to judge the value for money in terms of output and outcomes unless we examine the quantity and quality of the physical inputs used for implementation of projects and programs. So in the medium term strategy and business plan, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) also include inputs and intermediate outputs which are used for production of outputs. Programs/Projects/Activities The Technical Committee considered all feasible programs/projects/activities to achieve the specified outputs/outcomes of the Ministry of Agriculture. It may be reiterated here that the Ministry Budget Framework (MBF) prepared as a part of the medium term budgeting provides yearly allocations of expenditure for all approved and unapproved projects/ programs/ activities for the budget year and four forward years on the basis of ministry wise financial ceilings provided by the Finance Division. But the MTSBP is prepared without any formal ceilings on expenditure, although realistic resource levels are kept in view. The MTSBP considers approved and anticipated projects/ programs/activities for establishing an effective linkage between the strategic policy objectives and a realistic expenditure plan for the Agriculture Ministry and its subordinate agencies. Particularly, the Technical Committee has conceived all feasible projects/ xvii Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan programs which could be implemented by the Agencies/Departments. However, a participative approach by all the Departments/Agencies under the Ministry and a combination of top-down and bottom-up approach were adopted to finalize the lists of projects and programs in the MTSBP. As in the case of preparation of the MTSBP, programs/projects are graded as "Top priority (TP)", "Medium Priority (MP)"and "Low Priority (LP)". While discussing sources of financing and implementation of projects/ programs, the Technical Committee explored various policy options such as (a) Private Sector & NGO Participation; (b) Public-Private Partnership (PPP) and (c) Activities to be implemented by the Government. Financing Needs Past trends of developmental, non-developmental and overall budget for the Ministry of Agriculture during 2007-08 to 2011-12 indicate that despite very good absorption capacity and budget implementation records by the Ministry, the share of the MOA has shown a declining trend in overall development budget, non-development budget, recurrent budget, capital budget and total budget of the government. This may be due to higher needs for material production sectors such as energy and power, and services sector such as education and health. The ratio of MOA expenditure in total government revenue, overall GDP and crop sector GDP has also remained stagnant over the years. However, on considering the strategic importance of the MOA for ensuring food security and also for poverty alleviation, Finance Division may consider higher allocation for MOA. As per the MTSBP, projected expenditures of the Ministry of Agriculture are expected to rise from Taka 10009 crore (amounting to 9.75% of Crops GDP) in 2012-13 to Taka 13364 crore (amounting to 9.52% of Crops GDP) in 2015-16 and Taka 12783 crore (amounting to 8.2% of Crops GDP) in 2016-17. Annual Performance Plan The MTSBP provides details of dominant performance indicators and their yearly targets for each Department and Agencies under the Ministry. These KPIs for inputs and outputs will be monitored and evaluated and necessary reports will be prepared to judge financial and physical compliance, efficiency and effectiveness of projects/programs and to take corrective measures during the planning horizon. Procurement Plan The MTSBP also provides detailed procurement plans for quality seeds, fertilizers and machinery and equipment for minor irrigation. Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring and Evaluation and reporting form an integral part of an effective Medium Term Strategic Business Planning and performance based budgeting. Plan becomes successful and the value for money is realized only when the proposed targets for outcomes/ outputs are achieved. xviii Executive Summary MTSBP discusses in detail the monitoring and evaluation methodology, techniques and institutional set-up in the Ministry. In addition to the normal monitoring and evaluation of projects implementation by the ADP Review Committee chaired by the Minister and the Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED) of the Ministry of Planning, it is necessary to monitor and evaluate the trends of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for both Outputs and Inputs and other performance parameters indicated for projects/programs being implemented by the agencies and departments in order to judge the efficiency and effectiveness2 of the projects/programs/activities. For these activities, it is necessary to strengthen the M&E cells in the Secretariat and Agencies/Departments and to upgrade the needed ICT infrastructure and inter-linkages. Concluding observation The Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan and the Annual Performance Plans are living documents and may have to be reviewed/modified/updated at periodic intervals in order to take care of dynamics of the change in internal and external economic environment and major policy changes and consistent with new policy by the government to make them realistic, operational and effective. In general such reviews and modifications are made after three years. It may be mentioned that a soft version of the MTSBP will be posted on the Website of the Ministry of Agriculture. As and when necessary this document may be reviewed/modified/updated accordingly. xix 2 There are three types of evaluation depending on evaluating the actual inputs, outputs and outcomes in relation to planned/ budgeted inputs, outputs and outcomes. While comparison of actual inputs with planned inputs (both financial and physical) determines (financial/ physical) compliance, comparison of actual outputs with planned outputs determines the efficiency of a project, and comparison of actual outcomes with planned outcomes determines the effectiveness of a project. Background, Scope and Outline 1.1 Background, Scope and Objectives Background The government of Bangladesh introduced Medium Term Budget Framework (MTBF) in FY2005-06 for institutionalising linkage between policies, strategies and budget in order to link more effectively intra- and inter-sector budget allocations with government’s priorities for the medium term and to have a focus on outputs and outcomes rather than inputs and activities. Ministry of Agriculture was one of four line ministries selected for piloting MTBF on the basis of its strategic importance in poverty reduction and economic development of Bangladesh. Significant progress on MTBF has been made since then and by the fiscal year 2011-12, the MTBF has been rolled out to all ministries, divisions and other institutions in Bangladesh. As a part of a wider project being executed by the Finance Division for strengthening and deepening MTBF in line ministries, it has been decided to prepare Medium Term Strategy and Business Plans (MTSBP) for ten major ministries. Considering the importance and contribution of agriculture sector in Bangladesh economy, the Ministry of Agriculture has been selected first among all strategic ministries for piloting the MTSBP. 1 C h a p t e r 1 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Scope and Objectives The Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan (MTSBP) for the Ministry of Agriculture is a comprehensive plan for the Ministry and all Agencies and Departments for five years (2012-2016). It is a combination of a Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan and Annual Performance Plan for the Ministry, and form the basis for the preparation of the subsequent Ministry Budget Frameworks (MBF) and the Annual Demand for Grants. The focus, scope and objectives of the Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan and the Annual Performance Plan are summarized below: A. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan (MTSBP) Purpose: MTSBP sets out the ministry’s vision, mission, strategic goals, policies, programs/ projects/activities for a five-year period, as mandated under the Allocation of Business. For preparation of MTSBP, no explicit resource ceiling have been set, though, there may be implicit ceilings on financing depending on constraints of other inputs such as manpower, ICT, capacity building, infrastructure facilities, etc. Focus: The Strategy and Business Plan focuses on strategic outcomes and objectives for the Ministry of Agriculture and its Agencies in entirety, and specifies programs/projects/ activities to achieve these identified objectives. Linked: MTSBP has been prepared in a manner consistent with the Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015), Perspective Plan (2010-2021), Vision 2021, Millennium Development Goals, policy documents, Citizens’ Charter, and the MBF documents of the Ministry of Agriculture. Timeframe: It covers a period of five years from 2012 to 2016, coinciding with the last four years of the Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015) and an additional year as the terminal year. Updating: MTSBP is a living document and therefore may be reviewed and modified during the five-year period. However, in general, such reviews and modifications are made after three years and limited to changes in underlying policy framework or significant changes in internal and external environment. Besides, as and when necessary, this document may be reviewed/modified/updated accordingly. B. Annual Performance Plan Purpose: Annual Performance Plan specifies the performance indicators and targets for projects/programs/activities for the MTSBP period. Focus: It focuses on strict time schedules to implement budgeted programs/projects/ activities and to monitor the associated performance indicators and targets. Linked: It is linked to the Strategic Plan, the Annual Demand for Grants and the MBF. In-year monitoring of the Annual Performance Plan may be conducted through special surveys and the preparation of quarterly and annual performance reports. Timeframe: The Annual Performance Plan covers the MTSBP period. Updating: In general, in-year changes to the plan should not be done on routine basis. Rather, it may be done sparingly and judiciously on the basis significant changes in strategies, policies or resources under the MTBF due to unforeseen events, natural disasters or external developments affecting the agriculture sector. 2 Background, Scope and Outline 1.2 Outline of the Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Following this chapter on Background, Scope and Outline, the Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan for the Ministry of Agriculture comprises five additional chapters as per the Contents and Operational Guidelines3 for the preparation of MTSBP for Line Ministries and Divisions. Chapter-2 on Situational Assessment discusses the role and current state of agriculture in Bangladesh, organizational structure and functions of the Ministry of Agriculture, political economic-social-technological (PEST) context, Strengths-Weakness-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) Analysis and multi-stakeholders’ analysis. Chapter-3 deals with legal mandate, major issues and development challenges, policy and regulatory framework, main aspects of Citizens Charter, and interrelations of MTSBP with national Sixth Five Year Plan, Perspective Plan and Vision 2021. Chapter-4 identifies strategic objectives and linkages between strategic objectives and major policy documents of the Ministry of Agriculture, Key performance indicators of the Ministry on the basis of Vision, Mission, Core Values/Driving Principles, and makes an analysis of past trends of key performance indicators (KPIs). It makes year-wise projections of key performance indicators for the planning period on the basis of standard statistical and econometric techniques. This chapter also describes projection of major food grain requirements for food security during the planning horizon. Chapter-5 specifies programs/projects and activities, estimates financing needs for imple mentation of these programs/projects and indicates sources of financing. Chapter-6 provides the Annual Performance Plans for the Secretariat and all Agencies and Departments under the Ministry of Agriculture. Chapter-7 identifies existing monitoring and evaluation system and proposed M & E mechanism and technique of the Annual Performance Plan. Chapters are supported by essential Annexes on data base and methodology. The MTSBP ends with selected references on the subject. Annex 1 indicates the composition of Technical Committee to prepare MTSBP, Annex 2 indicates the Area and Production of Crops, Annex 3 provides the trend of Agricultural inputs and outputs during the last decade (2000-2010), Annex 4 provides methodology for the projections of input and output/outcome KPIs for the medium term planning horizon (2012-2016), Annex 5 presents Ministry level medium term strategy, Annex 6 presents the Department/Agency wise cost estimates of projects while Annex 7 provides Department/Agency wise Annual Performance Plans. 3 3 Finance Division (2012) An Operational Guide to Prepare Medium Term Strategic Business Plans (MTSBP) For Line Ministries/Division, pp.1-42, Strengthening Public Expenditure Management Program, Deepening Medium Term Budgeting Framework and Financial Accountability Project, Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh, April 2012. 5 Situational Assessment 2.1 Role of Agriculture in Bangladesh Economy In Bangladesh, as in all low income developing countries, agriculture is a very special sector for various reasons, particularly the following: First, agriculture has a universal role for providing food, a basic need linked to the survival of mankind. It has also a strategic role of political importance, particularly in times of internal and external threats, conflicts and civil war. Second, it is linked to deeply cherished traditions and a special way of life of the rural and ethnic communities over many years. It seeks to nurture cultural heritage, social stability and the preservation of the natural environment. Third, most important from a development perspective, three quarters of the world’s poor still depend on agriculture for employment of last resort. Fourth, Agriculture growth is subject to uncertainty and risks caused by weather shocks, natural disaster, and highly volatile international prices of food products. In addition the peril of Climate Change is feared to adversely affect the agricultural production most. All these factors make strategic planning and choices of policies and programs for agriculture very important and highly sensitive. For a poor and developing country like Bangladesh with large and growing population and high population density, the issues related to food security, nutrition, employment generation, poverty reduction, rural development and overall social welfare need to be examined comprehensively before formulating a medium term strategic plan for agriculture. 2.2 Rank of Bangladesh Agriculture in the World Agricultural sector (comprising crops and horticulture, animal husbandry, forestry and fishing) is a prime sector to raise income of the people, improve food security and reduce poverty in Bangladesh. It is also an important sector to meet the Vision 2021 objectives and to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) targets “to halve the proportion of poor and those who suffer from hunger by 2015.” Agriculture contributes about one fifth to overall GDP of Bangladesh, employs 48 percent of labor force and is the major source of livelihood for 70 percent of rural people. Relative position of Bangladesh in the world in terms of various parameters relating to agriculture sector is presented in Table 2.1. It may be observed from this table that, in the world, Bangladesh ranks first in terms of arable land as a percentage of land area, and agricultural raw materials imports as percentage of total merchandise imports; fifth in terms of rice production (currently Bangladesh ranks fourth after China, Indonesia and C h a p t e r 2 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Japan), rice consumption and area under rice production; 15th in irrigated land as percentage of crop land; 16th in terms of arable land, 12th in cotton imports, 15th in cotton use and 39th in cotton production; 20th in fertilizer use; 18th in banana production, 14th in terms of land under cereal production, and 12th in terms of mango production. In farm employment Bangladesh ranks 2nd in terms of workers per hectare. But, the land yields are very low. It ranks 14 (out of 23 countries) in terms rice yield and 17th (out of 26 countries) in terms of wheat. 6 Table 2.1: Ranks of Various Parameters Relating to Bangladesh Agriculture in the World Items Value Rank out of Countries Total Area (‘000 sq.km) 144 [99th of 248] Population (million) in 2011 150.5 [7th of 240] GDP PPP adjusted (US$ Billion) in 2010 259 [46th of 227] GDP per capita (US dollar) in 2010 700 [187 of 213] Agricultural machinery (Number of tractors) 5,530 [101st of 190] Agricultural machinery (number of tractors per 100 hectares of arable land) 6.94 [164th of 188] Agricultural raw materials exports (percentage of merchandise exports) 1.94 % [61st of 154] Agricultural raw materials imports (percentage of merchandise imports) 8.81 % [1st of 155] Agriculture GDP at 2000 US$ (per capita) US$92.5 [104th of 164] Agriculture GDP at current US$ (per $ GDP) US$193.2 per $1,000 of GDP [46th of 182] Agriculture GDPat current US$ (per capita) US$81.8 [123rd of 182] Arable and permanent cropland 8.48 million hectares [30th of 148] Arable land as % of land area 61.11 % of land area [1st of 199] Arable land 7.96million hectares [16th of 199] Area under Rice 10.9million hectares [5th of 23] Area under Wheat 0.57million hectares [25th of 26] Banana production 624.7 thousand metric tons [18th of 48] Cereal production 111 thousand metric tons [71st of 149] Cereal production growth 23% [49th of 149] Cotton imports 1,025 thousand bales [12th of 109] Cotton production 129 thousand bales [39th of 109] Cotton stocks 183 thousand bales [25th of 109] Cotton use 1,100 thousand bales [15th of 109] Crop production index 104.9 % [108th of 182] Fertilizer consumption per hectare of land 1,780.17 g/ha of arable land [34th of 169] Total Area (‘000 sq.km) 144 [99th of 248] Population (million) in 2011 150.5 [7th of 240] GDP PPP adjusted (US$ Billion) in 2010 259 [46th of 227] GDP per capita (US dollar) in 2010 700 [187 of 213] Agricultural machinery (Number of tractors) 5,530 [101st of 190] Agricultural machinery (number of tractors per 100 hectares of arable land) 6.94 [164th of 188] Agricultural raw materials exports (percentage of merchandise exports) 1.94 % [61st of 154] Agricultural raw materials imports (percentage of merchandise imports) 8.81 % [1st of 155] Agriculture GDP at 2000 US$ (per capita) US$92.5 [104th of 164] Agriculture GDP at current US$ (per $ GDP) US$193.2 per $1,000 of GDP [46th of 182] Agriculture GDPat current US$ (per capita) US$81.8 [123rd of 182] Arable and permanent cropland 8.48 million hectares [30th of 148] Arable land as % of land area 61.11 % of land area [1st of 199] Arable land 7.96million hectares [16th of 199] Area under Rice 10.9million hectares [5th of 23] Area under Wheat 0.57million hectares [25th of 26] Banana production 624.7 thousand metric tons [18th of 48] Cereal production 111 thousand metric tons [71st of 149] Cereal production growth 23% [49th of 149] Cotton imports 1,025 thousand bales [12th of 109] Cotton production 129 thousand bales [39th of 109] Cotton stocks 183 thousand bales [25th of 109] Cotton use 1,100 thousand bales [15th of 109] Crop production index 104.9 % [108th of 182] Fertilizer consumption per hectare of land 1,780.17 g/ha of arable land [34th of 169] Items Value Rank out of Countries Situational Assessment 7 Fertilizer consumption 1.42million metric tons [20th of 169] Food production index 104.6 % [105th of 182] Grains - Rice consumption 26.4 million metric tons [5th of 17] Grains - Rice imports 500 thousand metric tons [16th of 38] Grains - Rice production 26 million metric tons [5th of 16] Production of Wheat 1.25 million metric tons [27th of 26] Grains -Wheat imports 1.3 million metric tons [19th of 43] Irrigated land (% of cropland) 56.12 % [15th of 164] Agriculture labor as % of total labor force 54.7% [44th of 149] Land under cereal production (hectares) 11.782 million hectares [14th of 176] Livestock production index 102.6 % [107th of 181] Mango (Area of High 12 Producers)a 51,000 hectares [12th of 12] Meat production growth 72% [34th of 149] Permanent cropland (% of land area) 3.53 % of land area [17th of 187] cropland 345,000 hectares [56th of 181] Pesticide use(per hectare) 0.4 kg [31st of 45] Root and tuber production 1.93 million metric tons [42nd of 149] Root and tuber production growth 12% [64th of 149] Tractor concentration 0.7 [121st of 147] Tractors(Number) 5,530 [94th of 147] Agriculture value added - annual % growth 2.21 % [79th of 164] value added at constant 2000 US$ 13.11billion at 2000 US$ [20th of 164] value added at current US$ 11.6 billion US$ [23rd of 172] value added per worker (constant 2000 US$) 323 constant 2000 US$ [125th of 163] Workers per hectare 4.6 [2nd of 148] Yield of Rice(tons per hectare) 3.6 [14th of 23] Yield of Wheat(tons per hectare) 2.21 [17th of 26] Fertilizer consumption 1.42million metric tons [20th of 169] Food production index 104.6 % [105th of 182] Grains - Rice consumption 26.4 million metric tons [5th of 17] Grains - Rice imports 500 thousand metric tons [16th of 38] Grains - Rice production 26 million metric tons [5th of 16] Production of Wheat 1.25 million metric tons [27th of 26] Grains -Wheat imports 1.3 million metric tons [19th of 43] Irrigated land (% of cropland) 56.12 % [15th of 164] Agriculture labor as % of total labor force 54.7% [44th of 149] Land under cereal production (hectares) 11.782 million hectares [14th of 176] Livestock production index 102.6 % [107th of 181] Mango (Area of High 12 Producers)a 51,000 hectares [12th of 12] Meat production growth 72% [34th of 149] Permanent cropland (% of land area) 3.53 % of land area [17th of 187] cropland 345,000 hectares [56th of 181] Pesticide use(per hectare) 0.4 kg [31st of 45] Root and tuber production 1.93 million metric tons [42nd of 149] Root and tuber production growth 12% [64th of 149] Tractor concentration 0.7 [121st of 147] Tractors(Number) 5,530 [94th of 147] Agriculture value added - annual % growth 2.21 % [79th of 164] value added at constant 2000 US$ 13.11billion at 2000 US$ [20th of 164] value added at current US$ 11.6 billion US$ [23rd of 172] value added per worker (constant 2000 US$) 323 constant 2000 US$ [125th of 163] Workers per hectare 4.6 [2nd of 148] Yield of Rice(tons per hectare) 3.6 [14th of 23] Yield of Wheat(tons per hectare) 2.21 [17th of 26] Source: http://www.nationmaster.com on the basis of the primary sources: viz. a. FAO, United Nations; b. World Development Indicators, World Bank, c. World Resources Institute; d. Production Estimates & Crop Assessment Division, FAS, USDA; e. Agri-Food Business Development Centre; c. United States Department of Agriculture. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Table 2.2 and 2.3 presents selected indices for agriculture in Bangladesh compared to those in the member countries of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)4 and some other developing economies in Asia (viz. Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines and Thailand). Among the SAARC member countries, Bangladesh ranks first in terms of agriculture land (also arable land) as percentage of total land, and cereal yield and fertilizer use per hectare. But per capita land holding is the second lowest. 8 Table 2.2: Comparative Role of Agriculture in Bangladesh, SAARC and Selected Asian Economies - I Country name Agriculture value added as % GDP Irrigated land as % of total agri. land Agriculture land as % of total Land Crop area as % of total land area Arable land as % of total land 2010 2009 2009 2010 2009 SAARC Afghanistan 30 4.8 58.1 0.2 11.9 Bangladesh 19 56.1 70.3 7.5 61.1 Bhutan 19 6.8 13.2 0.7 2.0 India 19 35.1 60.5 3.9 53.1 Maldives 3 26.7 10.0 13.3 Nepal 36 27.7 29.6 0.8 16.7 Pakistan 21 73.9 34.1 1.1 26.5 Sri Lanka 13 41.6 15.5 19.1 Other Asia Cambodia 36 31.5 0.9 22.1 China 10 56.2 1.5 11.8 Indonesia 15 29.6 10.5 13.0 Malaysia 11 24.0 17.6 5.5 Myanmar 36 19.0 1.7 16.9 Philippines 12 40.1 16.9 18.1 Thailand 12 38.7 7.2 29.9 2010 2009 2009 2010 2009 SAARC Afghanistan 30 4.8 58.1 0.2 11.9 Bangladesh 19 56.1 70.3 7.5 61.1 Bhutan 19 6.8 13.2 0.7 2.0 India 19 35.1 60.5 3.9 53.1 Maldives 3 26.7 10.0 13.3 Nepal 36 27.7 29.6 0.8 16.7 Pakistan 21 73.9 34.1 1.1 26.5 Sri Lanka 13 41.6 15.5 19.1 Other Asia Cambodia 36 31.5 0.9 22.1 China 10 56.2 1.5 11.8 Indonesia 15 29.6 10.5 13.0 Malaysyy ia 11 24.0 17.6 5.5 Myanmar 36 19.0 1.7 16.9 Philippines 12 40.1 16.9 18.1 Thailand 12 38.7 7.2 29.9 Country name Agriculture value added as % GDP Irrigated land as % of total agri. land Agriculture land as % of total Land Crop area as % of total land area Arable land as % of total land 4 The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) is an organization of South Asian nations, founded in December 1985 and dedicated to economic, technological, social, and cultural development emphasizing collective self reliance. Sri Lanka, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Bangladesh are its seven founding members, and Afghanistan joined the organization in 2005. Situational Assessment 2.3 Current State of Agriculture in Bangladesh Agriculture performance in the recent past had been satisfactory. During the last decade (2000-2010) agriculture registered an average growth rate of 3.6 percent per annum supported by a growth rate 3.5 percent by crops and horticulture, 4.1 percent by animal husbandry, 5.1 percent by forestry and 3 percent by fishery (Table 2.4). Growth rates of crops and fishery have been volatile as these sub-sectors are affected most by weather shocks and natural disasters. However, during the last five years there was significant acceleration of the growth rates in all sub-sectors. Thanks to favorable weather, effective management in distribution of inputs and better access to credit and extension services, agriculture recorded a strong growth of 5.1 percent in 2010-11 on a high of 5.3 percent achieved in 2009-10. 9 Table 2.3: Comparative Role of Agriculture in Bangladesh, SAARC and Selected Asian Economies - II Country name Arable land per person (hectare) Cereal yield (kg per hectare) Agriculture employment as % of total employment Rural population as % of total population Fertilizer consumption kg per hectare 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 SAARC Afghanistan 0.23 1,908 75 Bangladesh 0.05 4,144 60 72 281.7 Bhutan 0.11 2,177 65 63 31.9 India 0.13 2,537 70 167.8 Maldives 0.01 2,000 60 97.5 Nepal 0.08 2,295 82 1.4 Pakistan 0.12 2,592 63 217.2 Sri Lanka 0.06 3,974 33 85 257.9 Other Asia Cambodia 0.28 3,108 77 7.1 China 0.08 5,521 55 488.4 Indonesia 0.10 4,876 40 46 181.4 Malaysia 0.06 3,800 14 28 769.8 Myanmar 0.23 3,989 66 5.4 Philippines 0.06 3,232 35 34 140.5 Thailand 0.22 2,938 42 66 125.1 Japan 0.03 5852 4 33 235.1 Korea 0.03 6196 7 18 388.8 Vietnam 0.07 5161 71 402.3 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 SAARC Afghanistan 0.23 1,908 75 Bangladesh 0.05 4,144 60 72 281.7 Bhutan 0.11 2,177 65 63 31.9 India 0.13 2,537 70 167.8 Maldives 0.01 2,000 60 97.5 Nepal 0.08 2,295 82 1.4 Pakistan 0.12 2,592 63 217.2 Sri Lanka 0.06 3,974 33 85 257.9 Other Asia Cambodia 0.28 3,108 77 7.1 China 0.08 5,521 55 488.4 Indonesia 0.10 4,876 40 46 181.4 Malaysyy ia 0.06 3,800 14 28 769.8 Myanmar 0.23 3,989 66 5.4 Philippines 0.06 3,232 35 34 140.5 Thailand 0.22 2,938 42 66 125.1 Japan 0.03 5852 4 33 235.1 Korea 0.03 6196 7 18 388.8 Vietnam 0.07 5161 71 402.3 Country name Arable land per person (hectare) Cereal yield (kg per hectare) Agriculture employment as % of total employment Rural population as % of total population Fertilizer consumption kg per hectare Source: World Development Indicators, 2011. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Estimated Growth Rate for 2011-12 Prospects of agricultural production in FY2011-12 are fairly good. Favorable monsoon, continued fiscal incentives and other support for agriculture is expected to contribute favorably in agricultural production in FY2011-12. However, growth rate in overall agricultural production has been estimated to be 2.53 percent (significantly down from 5.13 percent achieved in FY2010-11); the deceleration of agricultural growth is basically due to marginal growth rate of 0.94 percent by the crop sector (significantly lower than 5.65 percent achieved in FY2010-11). Overall GDP growth rate in FY2011-12 is expected to be 6.32 percent aided by a growth of 2.53 percent in agriculture, 9.47 percent in industry and 6.06 percent in services. Presently, agriculture accounts for about 20 per cent of the GDP and provides livelihoods to 48 per cent of the total population in Bangladesh. 10 Table 2.4: Trends of Annual Real GDP Growth Rates and Share in Overall GDP of Agriculture (in percentage) Notes: 1. CV stands for coefficient of variation = 100 x Standard Deviation/Arithmetic Mean. 2. FY2012 stands for fiscal year July 2011 to June 2012. Other years have similar interpretation. Source: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Real GDP Growth Rates (percent) Shares in Overall GDP (percent) Year AGR Crops LiveSt Forestry Fishing AGR Crops LiveSt Forestry Fishing FY1981 3.3 4.5 2.0 1.4 0.4 30.9 23.5 3.5 1.2 2.7 FY1986 3.3 3.6 2.1 4.8 2.3 31.2 22.3 3.9 1.8 3.2 FY1991 2.2 0.8 2.3 3.2 7.9 29.5 20.2 3.7 2.0 3.6 FY1996 3.1 1.7 2.5 3.5 7.1 24.6 14.4 3.2 1.9 5.1 FY2001 3.1 6.2 2.8 4.9 -4.5 23.3 13.5 2.7 1.8 5.3 FY2002 0.0 -2.4 4.7 4.9 2.2 21.9 12.4 2.6 1.8 5.1 FY2003 3.1 2.9 4.5 4.4 2.3 21.0 12.0 2.5 1.8 4.7 FY2004 4.1 4.3 5.0 4.2 3.1 17.8 11.7 2.4 1.7 4.4 FY2005 2.2 0.2 7,2 5.1 3.7 19.3 11.2 2.3 1.6 4.2 FY2006 4.9 5.0 6.2 5.2 3.9 18.9 11.1 2.4 1.5 3.9 FY2007 4.6 4.4 5.5 5.2 4.1 19.3 11.5 2.4 1.5 3.9 FY2008 3.2 2.7 2.4 5.5 4.2 19.0 11.5 2.3 1.4 3.8 FY2009 4.1 4.0 3.5 5.7 4.2 18.7 11.3 2.4 1.4 3.7 FY2010 5.3 6.1 3.4 5.2 4.2 18.6 11.2 2.4 1.3 3.6 FY2011 5.1 5.7 3.5 5.4 5.4 18.4 11.1 2.4 1.3 3.6 FY2012 2.5 0.9 4.0 5.0 5.0 18.3 11.1 2.4 1.2 3.5 2001-12 3.6 3.5 4.1 5.1 3.0 19.6 11.7 2.4 1.6 4.2 CV (%) 43 74 29 9 89 9 6 5 12 14 FY1981 3.3 4.5 2.0 1.4 0.4 30.9 23.5 3.5 1.2 2.7 FY1986 3.3 3.6 2.1 4.8 2.3 31.2 22.3 3.9 1.8 3.2 FY1991 2.2 0.8 2.3 3.2 7.9 29.5 20.2 3.7 2.0 3.6 FY1996 3.1 1.7 2.5 3.5 7.1 24.6 14.4 3.2 1.9 5.1 FY2001 3.1 6.2 2.8 4.9 -4.5 23.3 13.5 2.7 1.8 5.3 FY2002 0.0 -2.4 4.7 4.9 2.2 21.9 12.4 2.6 1.8 5.1 FY2003 3.1 2.9 4.5 4.4 2.3 21.0 12.0 2.5 1.8 4.7 FY2004 4.1 4.3 5.0 4.2 3.1 17.8 11.7 2.4 1.7 4.4 FY2005 2.2 0.2 7,2 5.1 3.7 19.3 11.2 2.3 1.6 4.2 FY2006 4.9 5.0 6.2 5.2 3.9 18.9 11.1 2.4 1.5 3.9 FY2007 4.6 4.4 5.5 5.2 4.1 19.3 11.5 2.4 1.5 3.9 FY2008 3.2 2.7 2.4 5.5 4.2 19.0 11.5 2.3 1.4 3.8 FY2009 4.1 4.0 3.5 5.7 4.2 18.7 11.3 2.4 1.4 3.7 FY2010 5.3 6.1 3.4 5.2 4.2 18.6 11.2 2.4 1.3 3.6 FY2011 5.1 5.7 3.5 5.4 5.4 18.4 11.1 2.4 1.3 3.6 FY2012 2.5 0.9 4.0 5.0 5.0 18.3 11.1 2.4 1.2 3.5 2001-12 3.6 3.5 4.1 5.1 3.0 19.6 11.7 2.4 1.6 4.2 CV (%) 43 74 29 9 89 9 6 5 12 14 Real GDP Growth Rates (percent) Shares in Overall GDP (percent)Year AGR Crops LiveSt Forestry Fishing AGR Crops LiveSt Forestry Fishing Situational Assessment Composition of Agriculture Value Added Among the agriculture sub-sectors, in recent years (FY2011-12) the crops had the largest share (11.1 percent) in overall GDP followed by fishing (3.5 percent), livestock (2.4 percent) and forestry (1.2 percent) in the order mentioned (Table-2.4). However, as mentioned earlier, the growth rates of crops and fishing and so of agriculture had been highly volatile or unstable over the years. Within agriculture, crops have the dominant share (60%) followed by fishing (22%), livestock (12%) and forestry (8%) in agricultural value added (Table 2.5). 11 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 Crops Y1 98 0 Y1 98 5 Y1 99 0 Y1 99 5 Y2 00 0 Y2 00 1 Y2 00 2 Y2 00 3 Y2 00 4 Y2 00 5 Y2 00 6 Y2 00 7 Y2 00 8 Y2 00 9 Y2 01 0 Y2 01 1 Livestock Forestry Fishing Figure 2.1: Trends of Annual Growth Rates of Agricultural Value Added (in %) 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 Crops Y1 98 0 Y1 98 5 Y1 99 0 Y1 99 5 Y2 00 0 Y2 00 1 Y2 00 2 Y2 00 3 Y2 00 4 Y2 00 5 Y2 00 6 Y2 00 7 Y2 00 8 Y2 00 9 Y2 01 0 Y2 01 1 Livestock Forestry Fishing Figure 2.2: Shares of Agriculture Sub-sectors in Overall GDP (in percentage) Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Notes: 1. CV stands for coefficient of variation = 100 x Standard Deviation/Arithmetic Mean. 2. FY2012 stands for fiscal year July 2011 to June 2012. Other years have similar interpretation. Source: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Within crops during 2009-10, paddy had the dominant share (65.9 percent) followed by vegetables (10.2%), fruits (5.9%), spices (4.8%), beverages (2.7%) and fibers (2.5%) while oilseeds (1.8%), sugarcane (1.5%), pulses (1.3%) and wheat (1.2%) had marginal shares in overall crop value added (Table 2.6).The country depend highly on imports of edible oils, pulses and sugar to meet domestic demand and faces high international prices of food items, which are major sources of domestic inflation. Source: Table 4.05, page 108, 2009 National Accounts, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, August 2010. 12 Table 2.5: Shares of Sub-sectors within Agriculture GDP (in %) Year Crops Livestock Forestry Fishing Total AGR FY1981 76.1 11.2 4.0 8.8 100.0 FY1986 71.4 12.5 5.7 10.4 100.0 FY1991 68.5 12.4 6.9 12.2 100.0 FY1996 58.6 13.1 7.5 20.9 100.0 FY2001 57.8 11.7 7.9 22.7 100.0 FY2002 56.6 11.9 8.3 23.2 100.0 FY2003 57.1 11.9 8.4 22.6 100.0 FY2004 57.9 11.8 8.4 22.0 100.0 FY2005 57.9 12.1 8.4 21.6 100.0 FY2006 58.8 12.5 8.0 20.6 100.0 FY2007 59.7 12.3 7.8 20.2 100.0 FY2008 60.6 12.1 7.5 19.8 100.0 FY2009 60.4 12.6 7.4 19.6 100.0 FY2010 60.4 13.0 7.2 19.4 100.0 FY2011 60.3 13.0 7.1 19.6 100.0 FY2012 57.4 14.2 8.2 20.2 100.0 Ave.2001-12 59.5 12.3 8.0 21.5 100.0 CV (%) 4 4 8 9 0 FY1981 76.1 11.2 4.0 8.8 100.0 FY1986 71.4 12.5 5.7 10.4 100.0 FY1991 68.5 12.4 6.9 12.2 100.0 FY1996 58.6 13.1 7.5 20.9 100.0 FY2001 57.8 11.7 7.9 22.7 100.0 FY2002 56.6 11.9 8.3 23.2 100.0 FY2003 57.1 11.9 8.4 22.6 100.0 FY2004 57.9 11.8 8.4 22.0 100.0 FY2005 57.9 12.1 8.4 21.6 100.0 FY2006 58.8 12.5 8.0 20.6 100.0 FY2007 59.7 12.3 7.8 20.2 100.0 FY2008 60.6 12.1 7.5 19.8 100.0 FY2009 60.4 12.6 7.4 19.6 100.0 FY2010 60.4 13.0 7.2 19.4 100.0 FY2011 60.3 13.0 7.1 19.6 100.0 FY2012 57.4 14.2 8.2 20.2 100.0 Ave.2001-12 59.5 12.3 8.0 21.5 100.0 CV (%) 4 4 8 9 0 Year Crops Livestock Forestry Fishing Total AGR Situational Assessment Productivity and Growth The general agricultural sectors are Rice crops, Jute, Cotton, Sugarcane, Flower, Sericulture, Horticulture, Fisheries, Vegetables, Livestock, Soil Development, Seed development and distribution. Nuclear Agriculture has brought a new dynamic change in the agricultural sector of Bangladesh. Bangladesh has realized significant productivity-led growth in agriculture in the course of last three decades. Production of rice, the major staple, increased nearly four-fold since 1972 and reached 34.88 million tons in 2011-12 making Bangladesh almost self-sufficient in food grain. The MTBF target is to reach the production level of 35.50 million tons by 2015-16.The crop intensity has increased from 148 to 181 percent. Increase in rice production has been possible largely through increase in yield from 1.05 to 2.2 tons per hectare. Adoption of HYV, saline tolerant and short duration variety of seeds, application of minor irrigation, fertilizer, development of market infrastructure, input subsidy assisted in enhancing output of crop agriculture. Source: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. 13 Table 2.6: Weights of Value Added of Crops in 2009-10 Value added (Billion Taka) Share in total value added (In percentage to total) Crops Current prices Fixed prices Current prices Fixed prices A Major Crops 452.22 258.43 67.48 69.16 A.1 Paddy 427.09 246.10 63.73 65.86 A.2 Wheat 8.91 4.45 1.33 1.19 A.3 Oth. cereals 16.22 7.88 2.42 2.11 B Minor Crops 217.93 115.24 32.5 30.84 B.1 Beverages 21.91 10.24 3.27 2.74 B.2 Fibres 18.30 9.45 2.73 2.53 B.3 Fruits 52.74 21.90 7.87 5.86 B.4 Oliseeds 9.85 6.65 1.47 1.78 B.5 Pulses 7.71 4.75 1.15 1.27 B.6 Spices 33.04 17.75 4.93 4.75 B.7 Sugarcane 8.64 5.68 1.29 1.52 B.8 Vegetables 64.54 38.23 9.63 10.23 B.9 Other crops 1.21 0.60 0.18 0.16 Total 670.15 373.67 100.0 100.0 A Maja or Crops 452.22 258.43 67.48 69.16 A.1 Paddy 427.09 246.10 63.73 65.86 A.2 Wheat 8.91 4.45 1.33 1.19 A.3 Oth. cereals 16.22 7.88 2.42 2.11 B Minor Crops 217.93 115.24 32.5 30.84 B.1 Beverages 21.91 10.24 3.27 2.74 B.2 Fibres 18.30 9.45 2.73 2.53 B.3 Fruits 52.74 21.90 7.87 5.86 B.4 Oliseeds 9.85 6.65 1.47 1.78 B.5 Pulses 7.71 4.75 1.15 1.27 B.6 Spices 33.04 17.75 4.93 4.75 B.7 Sugarcane 8.64 5.68 1.29 1.52 B.8 Vegetables 64.54 38.23 9.63 10.23 B.9 Other crops 1.21 0.60 0.18 0.16 Total 670.15 373.67 100.0 100.0 Value added (Billion Taka) Share in total value added (In percentage to total) Crops Current prices Fixed prices Current prices Fixed prices Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Diversification of Agriculture Over the years, agriculture sector has undergone rapid diversification, particularly in the fishery, livestock and poultry sectors. The contribution of fisheries and livestock in agriculture GDP has averaged 21.5 percent and 12.3 percent respectively during the decade 2001-2010 owing to changing dietary preferences and domestic demand for high value food products, and tapping of the lucrative export market by the producers. Inland fishery experienced higher growth largely due to the cultivation and export of shrimp. Agriculture Exports Agricultural exports increased at an average annual rate of 5 percent in the recent past and accounted for about 10 percent of the total exports. Shrimp exports– the country’s second largest export item after readymade garments– accounted for nearly 5 percent of total export value. In the fiscal year 2009-10, Bangladesh earned US$ 687.5 million by exporting agricultural products which was 4.24 percent of total export earning amounting to US$16.205 billion. In addition to the exports of main agricultural commodities such as, raw jute, jute goods, tea, frozen foods, the Government has taken a slew of measures to increase exports of non-traditional agricultural commodities. Agriculture Imports Two prolonged floods and cyclones in 2007 caused 1.1 million tons shortfall of domestic food production causing unusual rise in food imports and exposing the nation to high international food prices. In 2008, grain imports increased to 3.4 million tons worth US$ 2.9 billion, which accounted for 17 per cent of total exports earnings in the year. This created upward pressure on the trade deficit. Domestic price of rice and wheat increased by over 60 percent between December 2007 and August 2008. During FY2009-10, the total import of food grain was 3.45 million metric tonnes (rice 0.087 million metric tonnes, wheat 3.36 million metric tonnes), whereas import in FY 2008-09 was 3.013 million metric tonnes (0.603 million metric tonnes of rice and 2.41 million metric tonnes wheat). 14 Table 2.7: Food grains Production (in Lakh metric tons) Food grains 2002 03 2003 04 2004 05 2005 06 2006 07 2007 08 2008 09 2009 10 2010 11 2011 12 2012 13 Aus 18.51 18.32 15.00 17.45 15.12 15.07 18.95 17.09 21.33 23.33 23.70 Aman 111.15 115.21 98.20 108.10 108.41 96.62 116.13 133.07 127.91 127.98 133.00 Boro 122.22 128.37 138.37 139.75 149.65 177.62 178.09 183.41 186.17 187.59 187.60 Total Rice 251.88 261.90 251.57 265.53 273.18 289.31 313.17 322..57 335.41 337.97 344.30 Wheat 15.07 12.53 9.76 7.35 7.25 8.44 8.44 9.69 9.72 9.95 10.36 Maize 1.75 2.41 3.56 5.22 8.99 13.46 7.30 8.87 15.52 19.54 20.42 Total 268.70 276.44 264.89 277.87 289.42 311.21 328.96 341.13 360.65 348.85 375.08 Aus 18.51 18.32 15.00 17.45 15.12 15.07 18.95 17.09 21.33 23.33 23.70 Aman 111.15 115.21 98.20 108.10 108.41 96.62 116.13 133.07 127.91 127.98 133.00 Bororr 122.22 128.37 138.37 139.75 149.65 177.62 178.09 183.41 186.17 187.59 187.60 Total Rice 251.88 261.90 251.57 265.53 273.18 289.31 313.17 322..57 335.41 337.97 344.30 Wheat 15.07 12.53 9.76 7.35 7.25 8.44 8.44 9.69 9.72 9.95 10.36 Maize 1.75 2.41 3.56 5.22 8.99 13.46 7.30 8.87 15.52 19.54 20.42 Total 268.70 276.44 264.89 277.87 289.42 311.21 328.96 341.13 360.65 348.85 375.08 Food grains 2002 03 2003 04 2004 05 2005 06 2006 07 2007 08 2008 09 2009 10 2010 11 2011 12 2012 13 Situational Assessment Agriculture Employment Despite a declining trend of its share in overall gross domestic product (GDP) from 31.2 percent in 1985-85 to 19.6 percent in 2009-10 mainly due to rapid expansion of services and industry sectors, agriculture remains the main source of income for the rural poor in Bangladesh. About 70 percent of the rural population and 48 percent of total labor force (Table 2.8) depend directly or indirectly on agriculture and related farm and non-farm activities for their livelihood. Agriculture has strong forward and backward linkages with other sectors and is a major source of supply of raw materials for the growing agro-based industries and nonfarm rural economies. Besides, agricultural productions are the largest source of market for a variety of consumer goods, including consumer durables. Hence, improvement in agricultural sector performance and sustaining its growth rate are critical for reduction of rural poverty and unemployment. A World Bank study indicates that the agriculture growth is, on average, twice as effective in reducing poverty as non agricultural growth. Source: Labor Force Surveys, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Like other poor agrarian economies, Bangladesh suffers from what is known as the problem of “disguised unemployment” and “seasonal unemployment” in agriculture and informal services, where people are temporarily employed with low hours, low wages and low productivity. About 78 percent of the labor force is engaged in informal sector activities (agriculture and informal services). Agricultural Credit With a view to ensuring food security and improving the socio-economic condition of the country, agricultural credit programs are in operation for disbursement of rural and agriculture credits through State-owned Commercial Banks (SCBs) and specialized banks including the private and the foreign banks operating in Bangladesh. SCBs and agricultural banks are also carrying out micro-credit interventions for poverty alleviation. During FY2008-09, credit disbursement stood at Tk.9,284 crore against the target of Tk 9,379 crore. A target of credit disbursement through Bangladesh Krishi Bank, Rajshahi Krishi Unnoyon Bank, four SCBs, Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB) and Bangladesh Shilpo Bank, the private and foreign commercial banks was set at Tk. 11,512 crore for FY2009-10, out of which, Tk.11,117 crore was disbursed amounting to 96.6 percent of the target. The overall situation relating to agricultural credit during FY2002 03 to FY2009-10 is presented in Table 2.9. 15 Table 2.8: Sectoral Distribution of Employment (in percentage to total) Year 1974 1981 1985 1986 1989 1991 1996 2000 2001 2003 2006 2010 Agriculture 78.0 61.0 57.8 57.2 56.6 53.0 48.8 50.8 51.0 51.8 48.1 47.0 Industry 8.0 8.7 9.4 10.1 10.1 10.0 10.1 9.9 10.0 10.0 11.1 18.0 Services 14.0 30.3 32.8 32.7 33.3 37.0 41.1 39.3 39.0 38.2 40.8 35.0 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Agriculture 78.0 61.0 57.8 57.2 56.6 53.0 48.8 50.8 51.0 51.8 48.1 47.0 Industry 8.0 8.7 9.4 10.1 10.1 10.0 10.1 9.9 10.0 10.0 11.1 18.0 Servrr ices 14.0 30.3 32.8 32.7 33.3 37.0 41.1 39.3 39.0 38.2 40.8 35.0 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Year 1974 1981 1985 1986 1989 1991 1996 2000 2001 2003 2006 2010 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Source: Bangladesh Bank. Fertilizer Fertilizer is one of the most important agricultural inputs, and availability and optimal use of chemical fertilizers is critical for boosting yields and sustaining soil quality. Fertilizers used in Bangladesh are mainly urea, triple super phosphate (TSP) and muriate of potash (MOP) and Di Amonium Phosphate (DAP). The increased cultivation of High-yielding variety (HYV) crops and expanding irrigation facilities led to about four times increase in the consumption of fertilizer in Bangladesh from 870,000 tons in 1980 to 3.44 million tons in 2009-10. Bangladesh meets only part of its total fertilizer needs from domestic production and depends largely on imports. Fertilizer markets continue to be subjected to numerous government intervention. While the retail sales have been privatized, production and distribution of fertilizer at the wholesale level continues to be dominated by the public sector. The government plays a major role in importing heavily subsidized fertilizer – urea and non-urea. While import and distribution of non-urea such as TSP, MoP and DAP fertilizers are mostly done by private sector entities and partly by the public sector i.e. Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation, imports of urea fertilizers are entirely done by the public sector i.e. Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation. Urea, which provides nitrogen – a key nutrient for soils, accounts for more than three-fourth of fertilizer use. Subsidy for urea creates nutrients imbalance in fertilizer use by the farmers. In addition to explicit budgetary subsidies, domestic urea production is cross-subsidized through discounted purchase of natural gas – the most important raw material in urea production – from the state-owned gas utility BOGMC. Encouraging use of “Guti Urea” (USG) and organic fertilzers are good option for optimal use of urea which can help reduce fiscal burden arising from the import of urea from the international market. Optimal use of fertilizer plays a key role in boosting yields, sustaining soil quality. It also has the potential to lower the government subsidy on fertilizer. Seed Availability of quality seed is an essential ingredient for increasing agricultural production. Since independence, Bangladesh’s remarkable success in tripling cereal production from 16 Table 2.9: Agricultural Credit Disbursement, Recovery and Outstanding Balance Fiscal Year Target Disbursement Recovery Balance 2002-03 3560.53 3278.37 3516.31 11913.35 2003-04 4378.94 4048.41 3135.32 12705.95 2004-05 5537.91 4956.78 3171.15 14039.84 2005-06 5892.21 5496.21 4164.35 15376.79 2006-07 6351.30 5292.51 4676.00 14582.56 2007-08 8308.55 8580.66 6003.70 17822.50 2008-09 9379.23 9284.46 8377.62 19598.15 2009-2010 11512.30 11116.88 10112.75 22588.58 2002-03 3560.53 3278.37 3516.31 11913.35 2003-04 4378.94 4048.41 3135.32 12705.95 2004-05 5537.91 4956.78 3171.15 14039.84 2005-06 5892.21 5496.21 4164.35 15376.79 2006-07 6351.30 5292.51 4676.00 14582.56 2007-08 8308.55 8580.66 6003.70 17822.50 2008-09 9379.23 9284.46 8377.62 19598.15 2009-2010 11512.30 11116.88 10112.75 22588.58 Fiscal Year Target Disbursement Recovery Balance Situational Assessment under 11 million MT to over 35 million MT, particularly rice, is largely attributed to the availability of quality inputs including seed. Major driver of crop production have been development and diffusion of improved varieties of seeds. Over three-fourth of the area under rice is now cropped with improved varieties of seeds developed by Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) and Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA). Gradual adoption of these improved varieties by replacing low-yielding traditional varieties has contributed to increase in yield, reduction in unit cost of production, and increase in profitability in farming. The NARS and the DAE have and will continue to carry out program for training and support services for adoption and development of improved seed varieties. Public sector now accounts for about 20 percent of supply stream of seed. Re-energizing BADC’s capacity to produce quality seed from foundation seed to breeder seed played a crucial role in augmenting public sector’s contribution to make available standard and quality seeds to the farmers. BADC, in accordance with the seed policy of 1993, is now mainly focused on the production of seeds of paddy, wheat, potato, and jute in their seed farms. BADC produces foundation seeds from breeder seed of cereal crops in its 23 farms, jute seeds in 2 farms, vegetable potato seeds in 2 farms, and pulse and oil seeds in 3 farms. It also engages farmers to multiply seed on contract basis. Introduction of contract seed growers has a strong ramification. The country’s SFYP emphasizes that production program of all other crops beyond foundation seed will be done by contract growers. According to the “Seed Policy” the public sector efforts will be supplemented by developing and encouraging private sector growers. Irrigation Further increase in crop production and bringing additional land under crop area or conversion of non-crop area under cultivation depends on expansion of irrigation facilities and more effective water management, particularly expansion of irrigation infrastructure like power pumps, shallow tube well, deep tube well and floating pumps based ground water irrigation. Public intervention (through development projects) in increasing irrigated land hinges on optimal mix of use of underground and surface water in an integrated and planned manner in order to increase cropping intensity, diversification and yield in an environ-ment friendly method. Farmers are encouraged and motivated for efficient water use management. The efficacy of new technology of AWD (Alternate Wetting and Drying) is being demonstrated to the farmers and received better response from them. The tech nological process has been supported by public and private investment for infrastructure for irrigation, flood control and drainage, because the optimum exploitation of the yield potential of improved varieties depend on good water control. The area irrigated has expanded rapidly since 1989 with the liberalization in the import of diesel engines and reduction in import duties and withdrawal of restrictions on standardization of irrigation equipment. Conservation of ground water and its use to reduce pressure on underground water on environmental consideration like global warming, climate change, and reduction of water flow to our part of the international rivers from the upper riparian countries would receive major attention. The Government has undertaken many projects to build over-ground and buried pipe irrigation canals in order to install power driven pumps, and to prevent wastage of irrigation water. Excavating/re-excavating canals, building of dams in mountain stream and rubber dams would continue to receive due attention. 17 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Following expansion of irrigation facilities and more effective water management, 206000 hectares were added annually between 1978-92, more than double the expansion of the past. As a result of these conscious decisions the irrigation coverage increased from 53.65 lakh hectares in FY2004-05 to 56.90 lakh hectors in FY2009-10. Current estimates suggest that during the next two decades, 15,000-20,000 hectares per year could be brought under irrigation, making it a major source of prospective agricultural growth. Agriculture Subsidies Agriculture subsidy played an important role in fostering agricultural production in Bangladesh and helped small and marginal farmers’ to continue to engage in production of food grain. It also helps to realize dual objectives of the Government to stabilize input and food grain prices. Unrestrained subsidy, however, not only creates fiscal burden but also artificially depresses market price of food grain. Experience suggests that investment in research, extension, irrigation and marketing infrastructure yields better result in the long run than providing unrestrained subsidy. This warrants in-depth policy review regarding subsidy regime. As given in the following table (Table 2.10), agriculture subsidy in Bangladesh accounts for 0.77 percent of GDP, 4.3 percent of overall budgetary expenditure, 6.1 percent of total revenue and 75.6 percent of total budget for the Ministry of Agriculture during 2011-12. However, it may be observed from the table that the neighboring India provides much more agriculture subsidy as a percentage of GDP or overall budget or total revenue, although it is more or less the same in terms of the total budget for the Ministry of Agriculture. From the statistics given in the following table and graph (Figure 2.3), it can be observed Table 2.10: Share of Agriculture subsidy (in percentage) Fiscal Year Agriculture subsidy as % of GDP at current market prices Agriculture subsidy as % of Total Budget Agriculture subsidy as % of Total Revenue Agriculture subsidy as % of Agriculture Ministry Budget 2007-08 0.73 4.2 6.4 64.0 2008-09 0.94 6.2 8.4 75.7 2009-10 0.72 4.5 6.2 73.9 2010-11 0.72 4.4 6.0 67.6 2011-12 0.77 4.3 6.1 75.6 Information for India 2012-13 1.32 8.4 13.4 74.6 2007-08 0.73 4.2 6.4 64.0 2008-09 0.94 6.2 8.4 75.7 2009-10 0.72 4.5 6.2 73.9 2010-11 0.72 4.4 6.0 67.6 2011-12 0.77 4.3 6.1 75.6 InII foff rmrr atitt on foff r InII didd aii 2012-13 1.32 8.4 13.4 74.6 Fiscal Year Agriculture subsidy as % of GDP at current market prices Agriculture subsidy as % of Total Budget Agriculture subsidy as % of Total Revenue Agriculture subsidy as % of Agriculture Ministry Budget Source: a. Finance Division, Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh; and b. Union Budget for 2012-13, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. 18 Situational Assessment that agriculture subsidy in FY2000-01 amounted to 100 crore taka, which increased 70 times to 7000 crore taka in FY2011-12 and it has been increased substantially at 12000 crore taka in FY2012-13. Increased prices for important agricultural inputs in the international market, such as urea and non-urea fertilizer, electricity and diesel for tube wells and irrigation pumps are subsidized either at the retail or the wholesale level. Although these subsidies reduce agriculture production costs, improve farm profitability, encourage production, improve food security and bring down food prices, they also put a substantial financial burden on budgetary resources. Increasing subsidies resulted in lower public investments in agriculture research and development, extension services and water and irrigation infrastructure. Investment in these sectors decreased from 5.2 percent of total expenditures in 2004 to 2.7 percent in 2007. Expenditure on research and development at only 0.3 percent of agricultural GDP is very low compared to 0.62 percent for other developing countries and 2.80 percent for developed countries.5 In the event of crises and natural disasters subsidy plays an important role to prevent production shock. The increase in subsidy should not be at the expense of investment in Research and Development which is crucial to sustain and enhancement of agricultural production. Unusual increase and volatile international price of imported agricultural inputs, such as urea and non-urea fertilizer, raw material for fertilizer, electricity and diesel necessitated providing agricultural subsidy to sustain production and safeguard farmers’ interest. 19 212 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 122 27 85.5 100 200 200 300 Amount of Subsidy 800 1100 1541 3900 5785 4950 5700 7000 12000 19 96 9 7 19 97 9 8 19 98 9 9 19 99 2 00 0 20 00 0 1 20 01 0 2 20 02 0 3 20 04 0 5 20 05 0 6 20 06 0 7 20 07 0 8 20 08 0 9 20 09 1 0 20 10 1 1 20 11 1 2 20 12 1 3 20 03 0 4 Financial year Agriculture Subsidy 1996 -97 212 1997 -98 122 1998 -99 27 1999 -00 85.5 2000 -01 100 2001 -02 200 2002 -03 200 2003 -04 300 2004 -05 800 2005 -06 1100 2006 -07 1541 2007 -08 3900 2008 -09 5785 2009 -10 4950 2010 -11 5700 2011 -12 7000 2012 -13 12000 Source: Finance Division. Figure 2.3: Budget allocation for Agriculture Subsidy from 1996-97 to 2012-13 5 Bangladesh Public Expenditure and Institutional Review - Towards a better quality of public expenditure, June-2010 by World Bank. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan International Practices, WTO and Agriculture Subsidies As a member of WTO Bangladesh has some rights and obligations in terms of participating in international trade. Among the WTO agreements some like Agreement on Agriculture (AoA), Agreement on Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures have direct relevance to agricultural production, input and output pricing, supporting agriculture and agricultural trade. Being a LDC country, AoA of the WTO provide some unique opportunity to assist our farmers and traders in the form of support/subsidy. Under the current provision of AoA, being a LDC, Bangladesh can give support/subsidy amounting upto 10% of its total monetary value of agricultural output, which is de 20 Pros and Cons of Agriculture Subsidies 1. Agriculture subsidies help in increasing agriculture production and keeping food prices and food inflation under control in short and medium term. 2. However, any subsidies lead to irrational and non-optimal allocation of resources among sectors. 3. Agriculture subsidies, in the long run, reduce economic efficiency in agriculture, reduce farmers’ profit margin, distort competitiveness in international trade and reduce investments in agriculture, particularly for R&D, extension services and infrastructure development. However, carefully targeted subsidies tend to result in improved overall economic efficiency and increased social welfare by providing safety nets to the poor. Box-2.1 Situational Assessment minimis level. Bangladesh’s current level of support/subsidy to agriculture is within this de minimis level. The major challenge is how to continue support/subsidy to agriculture within the WTO system to protect the interests of our farmers and making our agriculture economically efficient and globally competitive in the long run. A regime without farm subsidies will be an ideal one, provided it is accepted in all countries in the world. But the present situation is far away from the ideal one. Developed countries, by increasing their farm subsidies by quantum jumps are distorting global agricultural prices. Due to lack of financial resources, Bangladesh like other developing countries cannot match the developed ones in rendering high levels of agricultural subsidies. In such a situation, the good option would be optimally target agricultural subsidies and gradual withdrawn of subsidy to agriculture and diverting the money to agriculture research, extension and market infrastructure. 21 International Practices of Agriculture Subsidies  Agricultural subsidies of developed countries are many times their external aid. Total agriculture support in European Union (EU) amounts to about US$100 billion.  An average cow in the EU received a subsidy of $2.2 a day in 2005 compared with 767 million poor in the Asia and Pacific accounting for 21% of their population living on an income less than $1 per day and 48% earning less than $2 per day.  In 2002 US cotton producers received a subsidy of $2.9 billion which was more than entire GDP of Lao PDR or of Cambodia.  Agriculture sector support (subsidies to farmers and consumers and government R&D contributions) as percentage of GDP is just 0.12% for Australia in 2010, compared with OECD average of 0.85%.  In 2010, New Zealand farmers received the lowest level of subsidies with 1% of their farm income generated by government support, compared to OECD average of 20%.  Australia ranked second lowest with 3.2% of farm income derived from government support, and Norway had the highest level at 60%.  Agriculture accounts for less than 10% of external trade and less than 5% of GDP and employment in these countries.  But, Bangladesh is basically rural based agrarian economy and agriculture contributes 20 percent of GDP. International Examples of Targeted Subsidies  Farmers Card in India,  Food Stamps in Sri Lanka,  BPL (Below the Poverty Line) Ration cards and Food for Works Program in India,  Proposed Fertilizer Coupons replacing untargeted fertilizer subsidy in India,  Proposed Smart Cards with fixed amount to purchase mix of items (food, fertilizers, medicine, kerosene, diesel) in India  Cash Transfer to small and marginal farmers and vulnerable section of people (conditional or unconditional) in Latin America Box-2.2 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 2.4 Major Constraints for Agriculture Development in Bangladesh Shrinking arable land: Bangladesh is one of the world’s most densely populated countries and has limited scope for area expansion, as most of the arable land has already been brought under cultivation. Arable land is contracting 1 percent per year due to pressure of increased population, urbanization, industrial and service sector development, human settlement, building of infrastructure, river erosion and most importantly, as a consequence of fallout of climate and environmental change. The loss indeed is very alarming and needs to be addressed immediately. Due to this reason, vertical integration in production system is the main option for increasing agricultural production prospect of Bangladesh in coming years. Declining soil health: Soil is the greatest resource of Bangladesh. Over the last 2-3 decades, enormous pressure has been exerted on the soil resource to produce more food for its vast population. Intensification of agricultural land use has increased remarkably, along with increasing use of modern crop varieties, which in turn has resulted in deterioration of soil health. Many soil health related problems have been identified which hinder crop production. The problems are depletion of organic matter and soil fertility, nutrient deficiency, soil salinity, soil acidity, highsoil erosion, degraded rice soils, sandy soils, drought, drainage impedance, and water logging. These problems have arisen largely due to irrational human interventions. Appropriate actions are needed to solve the soil health related problems. Wide yield gap and regional variation of crop yields: The country is suffering from low yields per hectare, low quality of both agricultural inputs and products, volatility in production over time and regions, and wide disparities of productivity over regions and crops. Future growth of agriculture will largely depend on raising yield of major food grains, as average yield rates in Bangladesh are low in comparison with other countries 22 World Trade Organization and Agriculture Subsidies WTO distinguishes three kinds of agriculture subsidies as indicated below:  Amber Box: Trade-distorting subsidies- product-specific support (direct support and administered prices), and non-specific support (insurance and subsidies for capital and inputs). Subsidies in this category are mandated to be reduced and eventually eliminated under the WTO regime.  Blue Box: Subsidy directly linked to historical production (acreage support that limits production by imposing production quotas or requiring farmers to use a part of their land for specific crops). Blue Box support is not subject to WTO reduction commitments.  Green Box: Decoupled support paid directly to farmers regardless of current production or prices. These include support for environmental programs, R&D, pest control, extension and infrastructure provisions, buffer stock for food security, domestic food aid for poverty reduction and employment programs, relief from natural disasters, and government income insurance and income safety-net programs.  Green Box support is expected to cause little or no trade distortion and is not subject to WTO reduction commitments. Box-2.3 Situational Assessment in the region. Flood, cyclone, drought, salinity coupled with regional production variations and prices instability add to the miseries and threaten sustainability of crop agriculture growth. Inadequate marketing facilities and post-harvest management: In the existing agricultural marketing system of Bangladesh there are many middlemen active in different stages of marketing chain that deprives farmers of receiving due price for their produce. On the other hand the consumers invariably end up paying extra price. To ensure justice to both producers and consumers in a competitive environment, it becomes imperative to reduce the number of middlemen from the marketing chain by forming rural cooperatives and connecting producers with the rural and urban markets directly. In recent years there have been some efforts to develop horticulture and floriculture. This process needs to be facilitated by the creation of critical infrastructure for cold storage, refrigerated transportation, improved processing, packaging and quality control for crop based agriculture products. Impact of Climate change and natural disaster: The country is affected frequently by flood, drought, cyclone and salinity due to climate change. As a result, soil fertility, crop productivity and food security would be seriously threatened. In Bangladesh, about 1 million ha of the coastal region is saline. But very few varieties are available for combating salinity. Drought affects annually 2.5 million ha in kharif and 1.2 million ha in dry season. Kharif drought affects aman rice severely. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2001), costal area of Bangladesh may go under saline water by 2050. Due to the rise in temperature, crop production will be reduced by 30%. Climate change, especially temperature rise would decrease the boro rice by 55-62% and wheat by 61% by 2050 in Bangladesh (New Age, 2008). Sufficient varieties of crops and appropriate technologies are not available to cope with the adverse impact of climate change. Imbalance use and inadequate availability of quality agricultural inputs: As arable land area is shrinking due to urbanization and environmental pressures, judicious use of agricultural inputs, mainly High-yielding and hybrid seed varieties, fertilizer, and irrigation, has crucial role in increasing cropping intensity and yield. Excessive fertilizer is used without proper analysis of the soil quality. Again, wastage of water in irrigation is often seen. Conservation of rain water during monsoon is virtually non-existent that could be utilized for irrigating crops during dry season. Studies show that irrigation with surface water instead of underground water might reduce the vulnerability to hazards of climate change. Timely and appropriate measures for pests and diseases management are also important. But the technologies resistant to pest and diseases are still very limited. In terms of the use of high quality seeds, we are still lacking behind. Farmers are using low quality seed that is considered to be one of the major constraints to crop productivity. Lack of adequate resources for agriculture development: Agriculture sector requires more public and private investment as other sectors in services and infrastructure. The emerging areas in agriculture like horticulture, floriculture, organic farming, genetic engineering, food storage facilities, agro-based industries, branding and packaging and financial derivatives have high potentials of growth. Development of rural infrastructure, rural extension services, agro-based and food processing industries are essential for generating higher employment and reducing poverty in both rural and urban areas. 23 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Inadequate price support policies: A distinct bias in agricultural price support policies in favor of rice distorted cropping pattern and input usage. Crop production is highly dependent on procurement prices announced by the government. A shift from minimum support price system to developing efficient agriculture product markets is essential for crop diversification and broad-based agricultural development. Fragmentation of land and Small Farm Size: As is the case elsewhere in Asia, the sector is dominated by smallholders with an average farm size of only 0.68 ha and more than half of all farms are smaller than 0.4 ha. Insufficient investment for flood control and irrigation: Given the geo morphological environment– with large parts of the country’s productive agricultural land being flood-prone– Bangladesh has traditionally invested heavily in water control and irrigation infrastructure, in particular flood control and drainage projects, which continue to absorb about half of the development budget. Inadequate access to institutional agricultural credit: About 90% farmers of Bangladesh are small and marginal (owner of below 2.5 acres of land). They are very often constrained by finance and thus cannot afford high cost for production and other production related management cost. The availability of bank credits to agriculture and agro-based industries, favorable terms of conditions for credit is essential to attract investment in agriculture. 2.5 Government Measures to Support Agriculture Government continued to provide fiscal, monetary and other measures to boost agriculture production. While the state-controlled distribution system for agricultural inputs gradually dismantled and the sector opened up for private sector participation, the government continues to play a major role, with numerous market interventions still existing on the production side. Major supportive measures and incentives provided by the government to agricultural producers and consumers include the following: a. Prices for important agricultural inputs, such as electricity and diesel for tube wells and irrigation pumps, and fertilizer are still subsidized either at the retail or the wholesale level. These subsidies are intended to reduce farming production costs, improve farm profitability and encourage production increases at the margin. This will, in turn, improve food security and bring down food prices. b. Formulating 'National Agriculture Policy, 2013' and other important policies, acts, laws, ordinance, rules, guidelines for agriculture development c. Distribution of hybrid-rice seeds, d. Uninterrupted electricity supply for irrigation at subsidized rates, e. Higher procurement prices for agriculture production; f. Better access to agriculture credits, farmers-friendly agricultural credit policy and helping farmers to open bank accounts with Tk10 only, g. The establishment of marketing clubs and growth centers for marketing agriculture products; 24 Situational Assessment h. Better delivery of extension services for agriculture; i. Public distribution of food grains at subsidized prices through monetized and non-monetized channels, including open market sales, fair price cards, feeding and development of vulnerable groups and food-for-work programs in both rural and urban areas in order to minimize the hardship of the vulnerable and working groups from the higher cost of living due to rising food prices. j. Encourage Public Private Partnership (PPP) to enhance the supportive measures for agriculture and food security. k. Strengthen campaign to change food habits through spreading awareness of nutritional food values among people. l. Train farmers to use balanced inputs. m. Develop coordination between government and farmers for proper utilization of khas land. n. Develop satellite based awareness system to inform farmers regularly about upcoming flood, cyclone, storm etc. o. Develop farmers database and farmers agro-input assistance cards. p. Enhanced agricultural rehab grants to victims of natural calamities. q. Support to accelerated mechanization of agriculture. r. Encourage surface water irrigation agreement on establishment of 'SAARC Seed Bank'. s. Introduction of E-agriculture program. t. Produce a master plan for developing agriculture across the coastal zone. u. Increasing public storage capacity and building buffer stocks. v. Establishment of marketing clubs and growth centers for agriculture. w. Establishment of assemble centre for agricultural commodities and formation of co-operative based marketing groups/association. x. Expand the agribusiness, processing and value addition activities. y. Develop effective value and supply chain linkage for different agricultural commodities. z. Conduct training for capacity development. 2.6 PEST (Political-Economic-Social-Technological) Context Physiography of Bangladesh and Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZs) Bangladesh forms the largest delta in the world stretching from near the foot-hills of the Himalayan mountains in the north to the Bay of Bengal in the south. Agriculture production 25 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan is highly influenced by the land use pattern, agro ecology, soil physiographic and climatic factors of a country. According to the variations of these factors and agricultural potential, the total land area has been classified into 30 agro ecological zones which are grouped into 20 major physiographic zones.6 Except the hilly regions in the north-east and south-east and some areas of high land in the northern part, the country consists of plain and fertile land. A network of rivers with a total length of about 24140 kilometers exist in the country, of which the Padma, the Jamuna, the Teesta, the Brahmaputra, the Surma, the Meghna and the Karnaphuli are important ones. The alluvial soil is continuously enriched by heavy silts deposited by rivers during the rainy season. Bangladesh is mainly an agricultural country. Agriculture is the single largest producing sector of the economy and it contributes 20.24% to the total Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the country. This sector also accommodates 48.1% of the labor force. GDP growth rate of Bangladesh overwhelmingly depends on the performance of the agriculture sector. Due to natural calamities like flood, cyclone, drought, loss of production in both food and cash crops are almost a regular phenomenon. Yet in recent years, there has been a substantial increase in food grain production. Agricultural holding in Bangladesh is generally small but use of modern machinery and equipment is gradually increasing. Rice, jute, sugarcane, potato, pulses, wheat, tea and tobacco are the principal crops of Bangladesh. Crop diversification programme, credit supply, extension work and research and subsidized input distribution policies pursued by the government have yielded positive results. The country is now on the threshold of attaining self-sufficiency in food grain production. Political Context Any strategic business plan cannot ignore the political economy and aspirations of the people. Bangladesh is a country of the People’s Republic with multi-party parliamentary democracy, free press, wide spread media and independent judiciary. Therefore, a medium term plan for the economy or any sector needs to be based on general political consensus for its sustainability over time. Any policy reforms cannot be implemented or successful unless the government is able to take the people along. An effective medium term plan must represent win-win situation for all the stakeholders involved in the development process. If all the people of Bangladesh are well educated, trained and healthy and live longer, they can participate more in the development process, can contribute more to development and also can gain more from economic development. Social Context Bangladesh has achieved significant progress in economic and social development in the last decade. It recorded almost 6 percent economic growth annually during 2000-2010 with low inflation, stability of domestic debt, remarkable reduction in the poverty ratio and significant improvement in social indicators, such as life expectancy, fertility control, child mortality, literacy and enrollment rates, which, in many cases, exceed other countries in the region and outside (World Bank, 2011). 26 6 For details of Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZs), see Chapter-1 on Introduction in 2009 Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh, published by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). Situational Assessment “Sustained economic growth and public spending in key priority areas have contributed to the impressive social outcomes observed over the years. The country has outperfor med most low-income countries on achievement of social indicators. Sustained expenditures on education and health in partnership with the NGO community helped to increase gross primary school enrollment from 72 percent in 1980 to 91 percent in 2010. Bangladesh has already attained the Millennium Development Goal of eliminating gender disparity in primary and secondary school enrollment. With the sharp decline in infant mortality from 92 per 1,000 live births in 1991 to 41 in 2010, and in child mortality from 146 per 1,000 in 1991to 54 in 2010, Bangladesh is set to achieve the targeted two-thirds reduction in these indicators from 1991 levels by 2015. Maternal Mortality reduced from 574 per 100,000 live births in 1991 to 194 in 2010. Sustained investments in roads and rural infrastructure have established one of the most extensive road networks in a developing country with significant social and economic benefits. Food security has improved markedly, even for the very poor; extreme poverty fell by 29.6 percent from 25 percent of the population in 2005 to 17.6 percent in 2010. At the same time, there has been steady fall in income poverty with the people below the poverty line declining from 59 percent in 1991 to 31.5 percent in 2010” (SFYP 2011). Demographic Profile Bangladesh with an estimated population of about 152 million is presently Asia’s fifth and the World’s eighth most populous country. Even though the population growth rate has fallen from 3% per annum during the first five year plan (1973-78) to presently about 1.3% p.a. (BBS, 2009), the number of population is expected to grow by another 40% by mid-century, to about 200 million, and finally stabilize around 240 million several decades later. The rural population (about 73% of the total population) is projected to remain around 140 million by 2025, mainly due to rural to urban migration while the urban population will continue to be increasing. The urban population currently constitutes one-third slum and two-third non-slum population; however the slums are growing at twice the rate (5% p.a.) of the overall urban growth rate (2.5% p.a.) implying that the slums will account for a rapidly increasing proportion of urban dwellers. Identifying massive increase in population as an obstacle to economic growth, the Government formulated the National Population Policy, which seeks to reduce fertility to replacement level (TFR 2.2) by 2015. This requires a further TFR decline of 0.5 children per couple. However at replacement level the country will still be adding about two million people annually. An increased population size will have greater demand for agricultural products to maintain food security. Investments in non-farm sector and in rural areas are required to stem the migration of people from rural to urban areas and 27 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan creating unsustainable pressures on services and utilities on urban dwellers including sanitation and water supply for urban slums. Poverty Ratio As per the Sixth Five Year Plan (Vol-1, page-13) “Poverty is the single most important socio-economic policy challenge for Bangladesh. It has been striving for a long time to reduce the incidence of poverty and to improve the living standards of its millions of impoverished citizens. Bangladesh has made substantial progress in reducing poverty, where the percent of population living below the poverty line went down from more than 80 percent in early 1970s to 31.5 percent in FY2010”. Other measures of poverty, such as poverty gap ratio and squared poverty gap show long-term trends similar to those for poverty ratio or headcount ratio. The decline in poverty ratio is the result of sustained economic growth over the past two decades, particularly the growth of manufacturing 28 Table 2.11: Population Projections for the Years 2011 to 2051 Scenario-A Scenario-B Average Year Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total 2006 73.0 68.8 141.8 73.1 68.9 142 73.1 68.9 141.9 2011 77.9 73.6 151.4 78.7 74.4 153.1 78.3 74.0 152.3 2016 82.7 78.3 161 84 79.6 163.6 83.4 79.0 162.3 2021 88.1 83.7 171.7 89.4 84.9 174.3 88.8 84.3 173.0 2026 93.4 88.9 182.2 94.7 90.2 184.9 94.1 89.6 183.6 2031 98.1 93.5 191.6 99.7 35 194.7 98.9 64.3 193.2 2036 102.1 97.5 199.5 104 99.3 203.3 103.1 98.4 201.4 2041 105.6 100.9 206.5 107.9 103.1 211 106.8 102.0 208.8 2046 108.9 104 212.9 111.5 106.3 217.8 110.2 105.2 215.4 2051 112 106.7 218.6 114.7 109.2 223.9 113.4 108.0 221.3 2006 73.0 68.8 141.8 73.1 68.9 142 73.1 68.9 141.9 2011 77.9 73.6 151.4 78.7 74.4 153.1 78.3 74.0 152.3 2016 82.7 78.3 161 84 79.6 163.6 83.4 79.0 162.3 2021 88.1 83.7 171.7 89.4 84.9 174.3 88.8 84.3 173.0 2026 93.4 88.9 182.2 94.7 90.2 184.9 94.1 89.6 183.6 2031 98.1 93.5 191.6 99.7 35 194.7 98.9 64.3 193.2 2036 102.1 97.5 199.5 104 99.3 203.3 103.1 98.4 201.4 2041 105.6 100.9 206.5 107.9 103.1 211 106.8 102.0 208.8 2046 108.9 104 212.9 111.5 106.3 217.8 110.2 105.2 215.4 2051 112 106.7 218.6 114.7 109.2 223.9 113.4 108.0 221.3 Scenario-A Scenario-B AverageYear Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Trends of Poverty Ratios (In percentage to total population) Box-2.4 Year Rural Urban National FY74 82.9 81.4 FY82 73.8 66.0 FY92 61.2 44.9 58.8 FY96 55.2 29.4 51.0 FY00 52.3 35.2 48.9 FY05 43.8 28.4 40.0 FY10 35.2 21.3 31.5 FY92 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 FY96 Rural Urban National FY00 FY05 FY10 Source: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Household Income and Expenditure Surveys. Situational Assessment 29 and services sectors contributed by the double-digit growth of export-oriented ready made garment (RMG) enterprises. The remarkable growth in the inflow of remittances also helped reduce poverty by supporting the expansion of construction and services sectors and by providing a strong safety net. Rural poverty ratios had been always higher than urban poverty ratios. In 1974, rural poverty ratio at 82.9 percent was marginally higher than urban poverty ratio at 81.4 percent. However, over the years the differences widened. The rural poverty ratio declined by 47.7 percentage points during the period 1974 to 2010 while urban poverty ratios declined by 60 percentage points during the same period. So we need more focus on reduction of rural poverty. Income and Expenditure Inequality There is considerable concern in Bangladesh about the growing income inequality. Successive Household Income and Expenditure Surveys (HIES) indicate that the distribution of income is much more unequal than the distribution of consumption. Income inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient for the distribution of income increased substantially during the 1980s and the 1990s. While Gini inequality ratio increased from 0.451 in 2000 to 0.467 in 2005, it declined to 0.458 in 2010. The reduction was mainly due to reduction of inequality in urban areas, while rural income inequality continued to have increasing trend during 2000-2010. Measures of expenditure inequality, which is a more reliable measure of inequality in view of the reporting bias in income data in HIES, shows similar trends of inequality over time. Indeed, expenditure inequalities are much lower than income inequalities. Macroeconomic Context Despite the global financial crisis since 2008 and frequent natural disaster at home, Bangladesh has achieved an average real GDP growth rate of nearly 6 percent per year during 2000-2010 supported by a growth rate of 3.6percent by agriculture, 7.5 percent by industry and 6.1 percent by services. In the fiscal year 2011-12, the country is expected to achieve 6.2 per cent real GDP growth aided by a growth rate of 2.5 percent in agriculture, 9.5 percent in industry and 6.1 percent in services. Trends of Income Inequality (Gini Coefficient) Box-2.5 Year National Urban Rural 2000 0.451 0.497 0.393 2005 0.467 0.497 0.428 2010 0.458 0.452 0.431 2000 2005 2010 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 RuralUrbanNational Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015) Targets The Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015) has set a target of 7 per cent for real GDP growth rate in FY2012, which is projected to accelerate to 8 percent by FY2015 in an attempt to transform Bangladesh into a middle income group country by 2021. Agriculture sector, accounting for 20 percent of the aggregate GDP of the economy, will continue to play an important role in achieving the overall growth target for the Sixth 30 Trends of Expenditure Inequality (Gini Coefficient) Box-2.6 Year National Urban Rural 1991-92 0.26 0.31 0.25 1995-96 0.31 0.37 0.27 2000 0.31 0.37 0.27 2005 0.33 0.36 0.28 2010 0.32 0.34 0.28 1991 1995 2000 2005 2010 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 RuralUrbanNational Table 2.12: Trends of sectoral growth rates and shares since 1992 (in percent) Real GDP Growth Rates (percent) Shares in Overall GDP (percent) Year GDP Agriculture Industry Services GDP Agriculture Industry Services FY1993 4.6 2.5 7.8 3.9 100 26.2 23.8 49.9 FY1996 4.6 3.1 6.9 4.0 100 25.7 24.9 49.5 FY2001 5.3 3.1 7.5 5.5 100 24.1 25.9 50.0 FY2002 4.4 0.0 6.5 5.4 100 22.7 26.4 50.9 FY2003 5.3 3.1 7.3 5.4 100 21.8 26.3 52.0 FY2004 6.3 4.1 7.6 5.7 100 21.0 26.6 52.4 FY2005 6.0 2.2 8.3 6.4 100 20.1 27.2 52.6 FY2006 6.6 4.9 9.7 6.4 100 19.6 27.9 52.5 FY2007 6.4 4.6 8.4 6.9 100 19.2 28.4 52.4 FY2008 6.2 3.2 6.8 6.5 100 19.0 28.5 52.5 FY2009 5.7 4.1 6.5 6.3 100 18.7 28.7 52.6 FY2010 5.8 4.7 6.0 6.4 100 18.8 28.5 52.6 FY2011 6.7 5.1 8.2 6.2 100 18.3 29.6 52.1 FY2012 6.2 2.5 9.5 6.1 100 17.9 30.1 52.0 Average 2001-12 5.9 3.6 7.5 6.1 100 20.3 27.6 52.0 CV (%) 12 42 14 8 - 9 4 2 FY1993 4.6 2.5 7.8 3.9 100 26.2 23.8 49.9 FY1996 4.6 3.1 6.9 4.0 100 25.7 24.9 49.5 FY2001 5.3 3.1 7.5 5.5 100 24.1 25.9 50.0 FY2002 4.4 0.0 6.5 5.4 100 22.7 26.4 50.9 FY2003 5.3 3.1 7.3 5.4 100 21.8 26.3 52.0 FY2004 6.3 4.1 7.6 5.7 100 21.0 26.6 52.4 FY2005 6.0 2.2 8.3 6.4 100 20.1 27.2 52.6 FY2006 6.6 4.9 9.7 6.4 100 19.6 27.9 52.5 FY2007 6.4 4.6 8.4 6.9 100 19.2 28.4 52.4 FY2008 6.2 3.2 6.8 6.5 100 19.0 28.5 52.5 FY2009 5.7 4.1 6.5 6.3 100 18.7 28.7 52.6 FY2010 5.8 4.7 6.0 6.4 100 18.8 28.5 52.6 FY2011 6.7 5.1 8.2 6.2 100 18.3 29.6 52.1 FY2012 6.2 2.5 9.5 6.1 100 17.9 30.1 52.0 Average 2001-12 5.9 3.6 7.5 6.1 100 20.3 27.6 52.0 CV (%) 12 42 14 8 - 9 4 2 Real GDP Growth Rates (percent) Shares in Overall GDP (percent)Year GDP Agriculture Industry Servrr ices GDP Agriculture Industry Servrr ices Notes: 1. CV stands for coefficient of variation = 100 x Standard Deviation/Arithmetic Mean 2. FY2012 stands for fiscal year July 2011 to June 2012. Other years have similar interpretation Source: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Situational Assessment Plan. Assuming no monsoon failures and no external shocks that might have adverse impact on agriculture sector, its growth rate is projected to average around 4.4 percent per year (Table 2.13), which is an exceptionally good performance when compared with the past. 31 Figure 2.4: Trends of Sector Growth Rates in 1992-2011 (In percent per annum) 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 GDP Argiculture Industry Services Y1992 Y1995 Y2000 Y2001 Y2002 Y2003 Y2004 Y2005 Y2006 Y2007 Y2008 Y2009 Y2010 Y2011 Figure 2.5: Trends of Sector Shares in Overall GDP in 1992-2011 (In percent per annum) 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Y1992 Y1995 Y2000 Y2001 Y2002 Y2003 Y2004 Y2005 Y2006 Y2007 Y2008 Y2009 Y2010 Y2011 Argiculture Industry Services Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan The projected agriculture sector growth is based on the continued emphasis on agricultural productivity and diversification supported by input subsidies, farm credits and expenditures on rural infrastructure development. As the feasibility of arable land expansion is limited, much of the additional growth in agriculture would originate from infusion of new technology, variety of crops and rise in factor productivity. The country’s SFYP envisioned a factor productivity gain of 10 percent. In order to increase the food 32 Table 2.13: Macroeconomic Scenario of Sixth Five Year Plan Macro indicators FY2010 Actual FY2011 Estimated FY2012 Projected FY2013 Projected FY2014 Projected FY2015 Projected 1. Real GDP growth rate (%) 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.2 7.6 8.0 a) Agriculture growth rate (%) 5.2 5.0 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 b) Industry growth rate (%) 6.6 9.2 9.6 9.9 10.5 11.5 c) Services growth rate (%) 6.5 6.6 6.8 7.1 7.3 7.8 2. Gross domestic investment as % of GDP (%) 24.4 24.7 26.8 29.6 31.0 32.5 3. National savings as % of GDP 30.0 28.4 26.7 29.4 30.7 32.1 4. CPI inflation rate (%) 7.3 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 1. Real GDP growth rate (%) 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.2 7.6 8.0 a) Agriculture growth rate (%) 5.2 5.0 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 b) Industry growth rate (%) 6.6 9.2 9.6 9.9 10.5 11.5 c) Servrr ices growth rate (%) 6.5 6.6 6.8 7.1 7.3 7.8 2. Gross domestic investment as % of GDP (%) 24.4 24.7 26.8 29.6 31.0 32.5 3. National savings as % of GDP 30.0 28.4 26.7 29.4 30.7 32.1 4. CPI inflation rate (%) 7.3 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 Macro indicators FY2010 Actual FY2011 Estimated FY2012 Projo ected FY2013 Projo ected FY2014 Projo ected FY2015 Projo ected Table 2.14: Projection of Agriculture Growth Rates and Shares in GDP During the Sixth Five Year Plan Source: FY 2012-15 SFYP projections. Situational Assessment production, enhance access to food and ensure nutrition, the Government has formulated a Country Investment Plan (CIP) for food security and agriculture development based on the National Food Policy and its Plan of Action, to be implemented within the framework of the SFYP. Inflation and Rural wage In general, food inflation has been significantly higher than non-food inflation (with exception of 2012), and the rate of increase of agriculture wages has been lower than that for industrial wages. Agricultural real wages grew by only 0.3 percent annually between 1980 and 2009 as compared with 2.6 percent in manufacturing and 0.6 percent in services. Although the gap between the average real wages in manufacturing and agriculture reflects to some extent the productivity gap, the existence of large and unorganized labor force in agriculture is one of the major factors for low agriculture wages. Agriculture Labor As discussed earlier, agriculture sector is characterized by seasonal and disguised unemployment. In order to boost employment in the non-agricultural sector, the manufacturing sector along with construction and organized services will be the engines of high growth. Accelerated growth in manufacturing, construction and services sectors projected under the Sixth Five Year Plan is expected to create 10.4 million new jobs in these sectors, which would help to absorb all new entrants in the job market (about 9.2 million) and also to shift sizable numbers of workers (about 1.2 million) from the agriculture sector. Those who will be left with agriculture will receive higher wages with planned program of crop diversification and commercialization of agriculture. The changing pattern of projected employment is shown in Table 2.17. 33 Table 2.15: Nominal Wage Rate Indices (Base 1969-70=100) Year General Manufacturing Construction Agriculture 1995-96 1900 2064 1754 1738 2000-01 2489 2832 2356 2141 2008-09 5026 6128 4311 4274 1995-96 1900 2064 1754 1738 2000-01 2489 2832 2356 2141 2008-09 5026 6128 4311 4274 Year General Manufacturing Construction Agriculture Table 2.16: Yearly Average Consumer Price Index (CPI): Base 1995-96 =100 National Urban Rural Year General Food Non food General Food Non food General Food Non food 1995-96 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2000-01 127 130 122 126 133 119 127 129 124 2009-10 222 241 197 217 252 183 223 235 202 1995-96 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2000-01 127 130 122 126 133 119 127 129 124 2009-10 222 241 197 217 252 183 223 235 202 National Urban Rural Year General Food Non food General Food Non food General Food Non food Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 2.7 SWOT (Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats) Analysis ‘Strengths’ indicate internal favorable factors and ‘Weakness’ refers to internal unfavorable factors, while ‘Opportunities’ refer to external favorable factors and ‘Threats’ refer to external unfavorable factors for an agency. SWOT analysis sets the stage for preparation of a Strategic Business Plan for a Line Ministry. It helps to identify the strategic objectives and strategies to fulfill the vision, mission and goals of a budgetary agency. Strengths and Weaknesses relating to a ministry organization and its business areas are identified in terms of internal resources such as manpower, skill, money, information and communications technology; the Acts and regulatory framework under which a LM works; management, research and development facilities, production, value added, investment and employment etc. of the business areas under the charge of the LM. Opportunities and Threats are identified in terms of external factors such as political, economic, social, cultural and demographic environment; external assistance by donors, external collaboration, international treaties and global public policies, terms of trade, exchange rate, world prices, external trade, smuggling, immoral and illegal trade of goods and services related to the business areas of the ministry. A SWOT analysis helps to identify the strategies to be adopted for the medium term planning. Basic purpose is to identify strategies that depend on internal strengths and try to take advantage of external opportunities. At the same time strategies are framed to tackle weakness by desired capacity building and to face threats and contingent liabilities by appropriate measures. 34 Table 2.17: Projected Pattern of Employment (million) Sector FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Agriculture 23.2 23 22.8 22.6 22.3 22 Manufacturing 6.1 6.7 7.4 8.0 8.7 9.7 Construction 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 Services 21.2 22.3 23.2 24.6 25.8 27 Total employment 52.4 54.1 55.8 57.6 59.5 61.6 Employment Growth (%) 4.0 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 Additional Employment 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 Unemployment Rate (%) 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 Labor Force 54.5 56.2 58 59.9 61.8 63.7 Agriculture 23.2 23 22.8 22.6 22.3 22 Manufacturing 6.1 6.7 7.4 8.0 8.7 9.7 Construction 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 Servrr ices 21.2 22.3 23.2 24.6 25.8 27 Total employment 52.4 54.1 55.8 57.6 59.5 61.6 Employment Growth (%) 4.0 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 Additional Employment 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 Unemployment Rate (%) 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 Labor Force 54.5 56.2 58 59.9 61.8 63.7 Sector FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Situational Assessment 35 Table 2.18: SWOT (Strengths-Weakness-Opportunities-Threats) Analysis for Agriculture Strengths (i) Agriculture generates 20% of GDP and employs 48% of labor force (ii) Significant extension systems for farm technology (iii) Experts and scientists are available for agricultural R&D (iv) Wide networks of Agricultural input providers (v) Potentials for uti8lization of hilly areas for farming (vi) Scope for crop diversification and expansion of hybrid technology (vii) Scope for Higher output of value added agricultural products (viii) Water is available for irrigation (ix) A facilitative institutional and regulatory framework exists In te rn a l F a c to rs U n d e r c o n tr o l o f th e M in is tr y o f A g ri c u lt u re Weaknesses (i) Weak Agricultural marketing system and High post harvest loss (ii) Limited Access to institutional agricultural credit (iii) Low efficiency of input use (water, fertilizer, pesticides) (iv) Inadequate technology to meet export market requirement (v) Inadequate infrastructural facilities for advanced agricultural science (vi) Less coordination among public and private universities for R&D (vii) Insufficient Use of ICT in extension system (viii) Inadequate support for farmers/ entrepreneurs training, (ix) Inadequate supply of quality inputs (e.g. fertilizer, seed). (x) Internal resources are fragmented and functions are duplicative. (xi) Climate change fallout E x te rn a l F a c to rs N o t U n d e r c o n tr o l o f th e M in is tr y o f A g ri c u lt u re Opportunities (a) Favorable agro-climate throughout the year for crop production. (b) Export potentials for High-value crops to upstream & ethnic markets. (c) Donors’ support for agriculture and irrigation. (d) Private sectors participation in seed and other input management (e) High world food prices provide significant incentives to farmers. (f) Export markets for horticulture, floriculture& agro based products. (g) Scope of exports of poultry and fisheries products. (h) Substantial inflows of remittances by the Bangladeshis living abroad. (i) Scope for developing rural based and cultural tourism. Strengths (i) Agriculture generates 20% of GDP and employs 48% of labor force (ii) Significant extension systems for farm technology (iii) Experts and scientists are available for agricultural R&D (iv) Wide networks of Agricultural input providers (v) Potentials for uti8lization of hilly areas for farming (vi) Scope for crop diversification and expansion of hybrid technology (vii) Scope for Higher output of value added agricultural products (viii) Water is available for irrigation (ix) A facilitative institutional and regulatory framework exists Weaknesses (i) Weak Agricultural marketing system and High post harvest loss (ii) Limited Access to institutional agricultural credit (iii) Low effff iciency of input use (water, fertilizer, pesticides) (iv) Inadequate technology to meet export market requirement (v) Inadequate infrastructural facilities for advanced agricultural science (vi) Less coordination among public and private universities for R&D (vii) Insuffff icient Use of ICT in extension system (viii) Inadequate support for farmers/ entrepreneurs training, (ix) Inadequate supply of quality inputs (e.g. fertilizer, seed). (x) Internal resources are fragmented and functions are duplicative. (xi) Climate change fallout Opportrr unities (a) Favorable agro-climate throughout the year for crop production. (b) Export potentials for High-value crops to upstream & ethnic markets. (c) Donors’ support for agriculture and irrigation. (d) Private sectors participation in seed and other input management (e) High world food prices provide significant incentives to farmers. (f) Export markets for horticulture, floriculture& agro based products. (g) Scope of exports of poultry and fisheries products. (h) Substantial inflows of remittances by the Bangladeshis living abroad. (i) Scope for developing rural based and cultural tourism. In te rn a l F a c to rs U n d e r c o n tr o l o f th e M in is tr yrr o f A g ri c u lt u re E x te rn a l F a c to rs N o t U n d e r c o n tr o l o f th e M in is tr y o f A g ri c u lt u re Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 2.8 Multi-Stakeholders’ Analysis The business scope of the Ministry of Agriculture is wide and ranges from crop development to agro-based industries with the help of various projects and agencies in the field of research and development, agriculture extension services, agricultural engineering and agro-economics. This ministry also addresses a large number of stakeholders in the country. Stakeholders can be grouped under two broad groups viz. primary and secondary stakeholders. Primary stakeholders are those who are affected directly by the activities of the Ministry either in a positive or negative way and secondary stakeholders are those who are engaged in an intermediary role with the goods and services produced/ delivered by the Ministry. Stakeholders can also be categorized according to their roles (such as contributor, imple menter or beneficiary) on the delivery of goods and services. Identification of stakeholders helps us assess what the stakeholders want from the ministry, what are their particular interests and what are the potential impacts of the Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan (MTSBP) on the interest groups.7 Table 2.19 provides the Stakeholders Analysis for the Ministry of Agriculture. 36 7 During Mid-term review, we have plan to conduct a workshop engaging major stakeholders (Planning Commission, concerned Ministries/Divisions, NGO's, Media, civil society, local Govt. institutions, local administration, Agricultural exporters, Agricultural Research Institutes/Agriculture Scientists, Agro-based industries, Bank and other Financial institutions etc.) Table-2.19: Stakeholders Analysis for the Ministry of Agriculture Power Stakes Major Stakeholders (Priorities of interest) Roles and Functions How can stakeholders block the Ministry of Agriculture? What the Ministry of Agriculture want from stakeholders? How the Ministry of Agriculture can help stakeholders? Finance Division (High) Allocation of adequate resources Inadequate budget, non-release of funds Adequate financial resources Timely, effective and efficient implementation of projects, proper audit and accounting ERD(High) Mobilization of adequate external resources Inadequate external resources Adequate external resources for financing projects needing foreign exchange Timely, effective, efficient and transparent utilization of external resources IMED(High) Timely monitoring of implementation of projects Delays in preparing monitoring reports Timely preparation of monitoring reports Providing necessary data and information BBS(High) Conducting surveys and proving relevant information for budgeting and result based monitoring Delays in surveys and providing inadequate data and information Conducting surveys and statistical analysis in time Proving full cooperation for designing and conducting statistical surveys Finance Division (High) Allocation of adequate resources Inadequate budget, non-release of funds Adequate financial resources Timely, effff ective and effff icient implementation of projo ects, proper audit and accounting ERD(High) Mobilization of adequate external resources Inadequate external resources Adequate external resources for financing projo ects needing foreign exchange Timely, effff ective, effff icient and transparent utilization of external resources IMED(High) Timely monitoring of implementation of projo ects Delays in preparing monitoring reports Timely preparation of monitoring reports Providing necessary data and information BBS(High) Conducting surveys and proving relevant information for budgeting and result based monitoring Delays in surveys and providing inadequate data and information Conducting surveys and statistical analysis in time Proving full cooperation for designing and conducting statistical surveys Power StakesMaja or Stakeholders (Priorities of interest) Roles and Functions How can stakeholders block the Ministryrr of Agriculture? What the Ministryrr of Agriculture want from stakeholders? How the Ministryrr of Agriculture can help stakeholders? Contd. Situational Assessment 37 Programming Division(High) Approval of the Annual Development Program (ADP) and Revised Annual Development Program (RADP)including inclusion of new Development Project proposal for ADP/RADP Delay in finalization of ADP and RADP Timely publication of ADP and RADP Timely, effective and efficient review and finalization of ADP and RADP Sector Divisions of the Planning Commission (High) Approval of development projects Non-approval or delays in approval of projects Sufficient development finance and timely approval of projects Timely, effective and efficient implementation of projects, accountability, transparency Donors and Development Partners (Medium to High) Providing adequate external resources Unreasonable conditionality for disbursement Timely and adequate disbursement of funds Proper utilization of funds,transparency, proper monitoring, auditing, accounting, reporting Ministries of Fisheries & Animal Resource, Environment and Forest, Water Resources, Disaster Management and Relief Division, Food Division, RuralDevelopment and Co-operative Division, Ministry of Land(Medium to High) Convergence of policies and programs under cross-cutting issues. Efficiency and effectiveness of delivery of public goods and services under the cross cutting issues Narrow sectoral interests can block or hamper crops growth, leakage of funds allocated for cross-cutting and sector-wide projects and programs Convergence for more inclusive growth. Timely delivery of public goods and services under the cross-cutting issues Timely, effective and efficient implementation of agriculture projects. Timely monitoring and evaluation, accountability, transparency Farmers, agriculture labor and rural households (Medium to High) Providing full cooperation for supply of labor and other inputs, social audit Misuse of agriculture subsidies and other government support Proper utilization of public resources and government support, efficient social audit Timely supply of quality seeds, adequate Agriculture credits, efficient extension services and marketing networks Agricultural Research Institutes/ Agriculture Scientists (Medium to High) Capacity development for R&D, provision of training Too much focus on basic and non commercial research, devoid of practical uses Commercializing research and developing efficient technology Provision of adequate funds for R&D Programming Division(High) Approval of the Annual Development Program (ADP) and Revised Annual Development Program (RADP)including inclusion of new Development Projo ect proposal for ADP/RADP Delay in finalization of ADP and RADP Timely publication of ADP and RADP Timely, effff ective and effff icient review and finalization of ADP and RADP Sector Divisions of the Planning Commission (High) Approval of development projo ects Non-approval or delays in approval of projo ects Suffff icient development finance and timely approval of projo ects Timely, effff ective and effff icient implementation of projo ects, accountability, transparency Donors and Development Partners (Medium to High) Providing adequate external resources Unreasonable conditionality for disbursement Timely and adequate disbursement of funds Proper utilization of funds,transparency, proper monitoring, auditing, accounting, reporting Ministries of Fisheries & Animal Resource, Environment and Forest, Water Resources, Disaster Management and Relief Division, Food Division, RuralDevelopment and Co-operative Division, Ministry of Land(Medium to High) Convergence of policies and programs under cross-cutting issues. Effff iciency and effff ectiveness of delivery of public goods and services under the cross cutting issues Narrow sectoral interests can block or hamper crops growth, leakage of funds allocated for cross-cutting and sector-wide projo ects and programs Convergence for more inclusive growth. Timely delivery of public goods and services under the cross-cutting issues Timely, effff ective and effff icient implementation of agriculture projo ects. Timely monitoring and evaluation, accountability, transparency Farmers, agriculture labor and rural households (Medium to High) Providing full cooperation for supply of labor and other inputs, social audit Misuse of agriculture subsidies and other government support Proper utilization of public resources and government support, effff icient social audit Timely supply of quality seeds, adequate Agriculture credits, effff icient extension services and marketing networks Agricultural Research Institutes/ Agriculture Scientists (Medium to High) Capacity development for R&D, provision of training Too much focus on basic and non commercial research, devoid of practical uses Commercializing research and developing effff icient technology Provision of adequate funds for R&D Contd. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 38 Producers and importers of fertilizers (High) Supply of fertilizers to farmers at affordable prices Inefficient distribution channels Adequate supply of fertilizers in right mix and quality Providing adequate subsidies Producers and importers of seed (High) Supply of seeds to farmers Inefficient distribution channels and adulterated seeds of low quality Adequate and timely supply of quality seeds at affordable price Providing adequate subsidies and creating a level playing field for both public and private sectors, declaring seed industry as a thrust sector, liberalization of seed import and extending seed certification service Agro-based industries (Medium to High) Developing agro based and food processing industries and developing backward and forward linkages Practicing monopolistic practices and cartels Fair trade and production practices Creating enabling environment for development and growth of agro based industries NGOs (Low to Medium) Spreading of awareness, implanting some projects Fictitious NGOs, Spreading misinformation Awareness generation, Social audit Financial resources and creating enabling environment Bank and other Financial institutions (Medium to High) Providing agriculture credits High lending rates, non-disbursement of approved loans Adequate agriculture credits Strengthening financial rules and regulations Media (Medium to High) Spreading of awareness, providing knowledge of agriculture activities Spreading mis information Awareness generation, Social audit Financial support and creating enabling environment Agricultural exporters (Medium to High) Facilitating exports of agriculture goods and agro-based products Unfair trade practices Efficient export services Creating enabling environment for exports of agro based products Transport organizations (Low to medium) Providing adequate transport services at reasonable freight rates Charging exorbitant freight rates Adequate transport services at reasonable freight rates Creating enabling environment for public and private transport Political leaders (High) Political support for government policies and programs Opposition to much needed policies and programs because of political ideology Support for government policies and programs Timely implementation of major projects and high lighting positive impact on development and poverty reduction Civil Societies (Medium to High) Build awareness for food security Misuse of subsidies and other government support Generating public awareness for food security Supply of food grains at reasonable prices Producers and importers of fertilizers (High) Supply of fertilizers to farmers at affff ordable prices Ineffff icient distribution channels Adequate supply of fertilizers in right mix and quality Providing adequate subsidies Producers and importers of seed (High) Supply of seeds to farmers Ineffff icient distribution channels and adulterated seeds of low quality Adequate and timely supply of quality seeds at affff ordable price Providing adequate subsidies and creating a level playing field for both public and private sectors, declaring seed industry as a thrust sector, liberalization of seed import and extending seed certification service Agro-based industries (Medium to High) Developing agro based and food processing industries and developing backward and forwrr ard linkages Practicing monopolistic practices and cartels Fair trade and production practices Creating enabling environment for development and growth of agro based industries NGOs (Low to Medium) Spreading of awareness, implanting some projo ects Fictitious NGOs, Spreading misinformation AwAA areness generation, Social audit Financial resources and creating enabling environment Bank and other Financial institutions (Medium to High) Providing agriculture credits High lending rates, non-disbursement of approved loans Adequate agriculture credits Strengthening financial rules and regulations Media (Medium to High) Spreading of awareness, providing knowledge of agriculture activities Spreading mis information AwAA areness generation, Social audit Financial support and creating enabling environment Agricultural exporters (Medium to High) Facilitating exports of agriculture goods and agro-based products Unfair trade practices Effff icient export services Creating enabling environment for exports of agro based products Transport organizations (Low to medium) Providing adequate transport services at reasonable freight rates Charging exorbitant freight rates Adequate transport services at reasonable freight rates Creating enabling environment for public and private transport Political leaders (High) Political support for government policies and programs Opposition to much needed policies and programs because of political ideology Support for government policies and programs Timely implementation of maja or projo ects and high lighting positive impact on development and poverty reduction Civil Societies (Medium to High) Build awareness for food security Misuse of subsidies and other government support Generating public awareness for food security Supply of food grains at reasonable prices Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges 3.1 Organizational Structure of the Ministry of Agriculture The Ministry of Agriculture is a major spending ministry accounting for 5.7 percent of total budget allocation during 2011-12. The Ministry with about 55+ officials comprises seven wings as indicated below: 1. Administration and Input Wing 2. Policy Planning and Coordination Wing 3. Planning Wing 4. Audit Wing 5. Extension Wing 6. Research Wing and 7. Seed Wing The MOA is led by a Minister supported by a Secretary, two Additional Secretaries, seven Joint Secretaries, a Joint Chief and a number of Deputy Secretaries/Chiefs, Sr. Assistant Secretaries/Chiefs and Assistant Secretaries/Chiefs (ref. MOA Organogram). C h a p t e r 3 39 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Departments and Agencies There are 15 Departments/Agencies (listed below and shown in the Flow Chart) working under the administrative control of the Ministry of Agriculture. They have various responsibilities such as production and development of paddy and wheat to ensure food security; increased production of high value crops like maize, pulse, oil seed, vegetables and fruits; development of High Yielding Varieties (HYV) of cash crops such as Jute, Kenaf and Mesta and Cotton; marketing, research, extension and provision of inputs such as irrigation, quality seeds, fertilizer, pesticides and insecticides. Ministry of Agriculture has the primary responsibility for formulation of policies, strategies and programs for these subjects, while their implementation rests with the following departments and agencies working under the MOA. 1. Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) 2. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC) 3. Barind Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA) 4. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC) 5. Bangladesh Agriculture Research Institute (BARI) 6. Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) 7. Bangladesh Jute Research Institute (BJRI) 8. Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute (BSRI) 9. Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA) 10. Seed Certification Agency (SCA) 11. Cotton Development Board (CDB) 12. Bangladesh Institute of Research and Training on Applied Nutrition (BIRTAN) 13. Agricultural Information Service (AIS) 14. Department of Agricultural Marketing (DAM) 15. Soil Resources Development Institute (SRDI) Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) is the largest agency of the Agriculture Ministry that supports the farmers through application, demonstration and dissemination of modern technologies developed by research organizations and its adoption. The agricultural development in Bangladesh has been largely led by an effective Agricultural Extension Services. It is also entrusted with the responsibility to organize the farmers and setting up farmers field schools for dissemination of best agricultural practices. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC) is responsible for timely supply of agricultural inputs (seeds, fertilizer and irrigation) to the farmers. In addition, the BADC provides mechanical equipment (tractors, harvesters and other accessories as well as irrigation equipment) to the farmers. It plays a vital role in expanding irrigated area throughout Bangladesh by different projects/programmes. However, its core task is multiplication, production and supply of High-yielding varieties of seeds. It has as many as 32 Seed Multiplication Farms and 75 Contract Growers Zones 40 Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges for this purpose. Seeds are mechanically processed in 52 Seed Processing Centers in and around the seed production zones. These seeds are distributed through 100 sales centers of BADC to the farmers throughout Bangladesh. Barind Multipurpose Development Authority(BMDA) is created directly under the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) for catering the agricultural development need of difficult terrain of the so-called Barind Tract areas, which spread over greater Rajshahi, Dinajpur, Rangpur and Bogra District, where the soil is hard and red, and unfavorable for cultivation due mainly to water scarcity. This specialized agency has been entrusted with responsibility to introduce agricultural innovations to make the area productive by adopting modern technology for irrigation, plantation, seed multiplication, storage, and rain water harvesting. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC) is an apex body of National Agricultural Research System (NARS)that is entrusted to ensure coordination of research activities among 12 NARS institutes and its dissemination. It is also responsible for Human Resource Development (HRD) of the different agriculture research institutions. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) is the largest multi-crop research institute conducting research on a large number of crops, such as cereals (except rice) tubers, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables, fruits, spices, flowers, etc. BARI also conducts research on non-commodity areas, such as soil and crop management, disease and insect management, irrigation and water management, development of farm machinery, improvement of cropping and farming system research, post-harvest handling and processing, and socio-economic studies related to production, marketing, and consumption. It has so far developed a total of 835 improved technologies including 393 improved varieties of different crops and 442 production technologies. Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA) conducts advanced research for development of crops through adopting modern technology. It has already developed 37 improved varieties of different crops and seeds for large-scale cultivation with the help of radiation techniques. It has also developed shorter duration crop (BINA 7) that can be harvested in 105-110 days instead of 145-150 days. Seed Certification Agency (SCA) has been performing its role for certification of all breeder, foundation and certified seeds of four notified crops – Rice, Wheat, Jute and Potato from both public and private sectors. It coordinates the variety evaluation and release mechanism for notified crops, carries out post-market quality control through inspection and testing and enforces the provisions of seed legislation. Cotton Development Board (CDB) has been established under the Ministry of Agriculture to introduce and promote cotton cultivation in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Institute of Research and Training on Applied Nutrition (BIRTAN): Its mandate is to develop human resources of various government and non governmental organizations in food based nutrition through short training courses, advocacy meetings, symposium, workshops and mass media support. Agriculture Information Service (AIS) established in Ministry of Agriculture in 1961 plays a significant role in disseminating best agricultural practices among all the stakeholders, particularly among farmers, by providing mass media support through radio, television, documentary film and print media specially poster, folder, leaflet, booklet, newsletter, magazine, banner, festoon. Besides, the organization has success 41 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan fully implemented various ICT interventions in Agriculture (e-krishi). The organization’s promotional activities include reaching the grass root level farmers through mobile van and organization of cultural program to promote best practices. Department of Agricultural Marketing (DAM) of the Ministry of Agriculture is a key organ of the agricultural system of Bangladesh that helps farmers by providing access to market places to sell their produce and supply them with price information. It has undertaken an e-government initiative for utilizing Information and Communications Technology (ICT) power to develop and disseminate critical Agricultural Market Information to farmers, traders, government, development agencies and other stakeholders. Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) is exclusively working for the research and development of cereal products through radical change in rice production system, replacement of the low-yielding traditional varieties and age old production practices of rice by high-yielding varieties and improved production technologies. Bangladesh Jute Research Institute (BJRI) is responsible for developing improved variety of jute,“kenaf” and “mesta” and its improved fiber and seed production technology, nutrient management, pest management and distribution among the farmers, and providing training to farmers, extension officers and field workers to disseminate the evolved technologies. Besides, BJRI is responsible for diversified jute products from sole jute and blending it with other natural and synthetic fiber. It also provides training to weavers/small entrepreneurs for making jute goods. Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute (BSRI) is responsible for innovation and expansion of production technologies for high yielding varieties of sugarcane and other different sweetening crops/plants, training for extension workers and farmers involved in sugarcane cultivation, and organizing training program including higher education for agricultural scientists and farm workers. Soil Resource Development Institute (SRDI) established under the Ministry of Agriculture is responsible for conducting detailed and semi-detailed soil survey, soil health condition, distribution of soil kits including distribution of soil guide and manual to ensure rational and optimal use of soil resource in the country. Organizational Structure of the MOA for performing its functions and respon-sibilities is presented in the following Flow Chart and the Organogram. 42 Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges 43 Organizational Structure of the Ministry of Agriculture Box-3.1 Source: Ministry of Agriculture. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 3.2 Functions of the Ministry of Agriculture Functions of the Ministry of Agriculture as per the Allocation of Business8 are reproduced in BOX 3.3 below: 44 Organogram of the Ministry of Agriculture Box 3.2 Source: Ministry of Agriculture Functions of the Ministry of Agriculture 1. Agricultural research and education. 2. Agricultural extension and training. 3. Soil survey. 4. Specifications of agricultural implements and machineries. 5. Communication with International Organizations. 6. Development of crops, viz, cotton, tobacco, vegetables and fruits, wheat etc. 7. Marketing of agricultural products. 8. Agricultural credit and taccavi loan. 9. Agricultural assistance and rehabilitation. 10. Agriculturist associations and agricultural co-operatives. 11. Planning Cell - preparation, evaluation, preservation, supply of seeds/fertilizers/insecticides. 12. Agricultural inputs viz, procurement, installation, management and maintenance of tube-wells and power-pumps. 13. Production and preservation of seeds. Box 3.3 8 Government of People's Republic of Bangladesh (2010) Allocation of business among the different ministries and divisions (schedule I of the Rules of Business 1996) (Revised up to June 2010), Cabinet Division. Contd. Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges 3.3 Legal Mandate and Citizens Charter Box 3.4 presents a list of major Acts, Law, Charter of Citizens, Ordinances, Major Notifications, Long Term Policy Documents, Rules, Resolution and Reports of Committees etc. affecting the functions of the Ministry of Agriculture. 45 List of Acts, Law, Rules, Ordinance, Notification, Long Term Policy, Resolution and Committees, Charter of Citizens of the Ministry of Agriculture 1. Acts/Ordinances 1.1 The Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 1.2 Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) Act, 1973 1.3 The Seeds (Amendment) Act, 2005 1.4 Fertilizer Management (Amendment) Act, 2009 1.5 Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC) Law 14 August, 1996 1.6 Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC) Ordinance 1961 1.7 The Pesticides Ordinances 1971 1.8 Cotton Development Board (CDB) Ordinance 1972 1.9 Seed Certification Agency (CDA) Ordinance 1972 1.10 Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) Ordinance 1976 1.11 The Seed Ordinance 1977 1.12 The Bangladesh Jute Research Institute Act, 1974 1.13 The Bangladesh Jute Research Institute Ordinance 1983 1.14 The Bangladesh Jute Research Institute (Amendment) Act, 1996 1.15 Bangladesh Nuclear Agriculture Institute Ordinance 1984 1.16 The Bangabandhu National Agriculture Award Fund Ordinance 1976 1.17 Fertilizer Management Ordinance amendment ordinance 2008 Box 3.4 14. Survey for irrigational purpose. 15. Import, management and maintenance of agricultural implements and machineries. 16. Preservation of crops. 17. Secretariat administration including financial matters. 18. Administration and control of subordinate offices and organizations under this Ministry. 19. Administration of B.C.S. (Agriculture). 20. Liaison with International Organizations and matters relating to treaties and agreements with other countries and world bodies relating to subjects allotted to this Ministry. 21. All laws on subjects allotted to this Ministry. 22. Inquires and statistics on any of the subjects allotted to this Ministry. 23. Fees in respect of any of the subjects allotted to this Ministry except fees taken in courts. Box 3.3 Source: Allocation of business among the different ministries and divisions (schedule I of the Rules of Business 1996) (Revised up to June 2010), Cabinet Division. (cont). Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 46 1.18 The Bangabandhu National Agriculture Award Fund Ordinance 1976 1.19 Fertilizer Management Ordinance amendment ordinance 2008 1.20 'East Bengal (Food Stuff) Price Control & Anti Hoarding Order, 1953 1.21 Agricultural Market Regulation Act,1964 (Amended in 1984) 1.22 Agricultural Marketing and Business Law 2011 2. Rules 2.1 Destructive Insects and Pest Rules, 1966 2.2 Dept. of Agro. Extension (DAE) Technical & Non-Technical Staff Recruitment Rules, 1985 2.3 The Pesticides Rules, 1985 2.4 The Seed Rules, 1998 2.5 Fertilizer Management Rules 2007 2.6 National Agriculture Award Rules 2009 3. Long Term Policies 3.1 National Agriculture Policy, 2013 3.2 National Integrated Pest Management Policy, 2002 3.3 The National Seed Policy, 1993 3.4 Integrated Small scale Irrigation Policy, 2011 3.5 Crop variety and Technology Development Policy, 2010 3.6 Policy for the determination of irrigation charge rate 2009 3.7 National Jute Policy, 2002 3.8 New Agricultural Extension Policy, 1996 4. Gazette Notification 4.1 Soil Research Institute (SRI): Bangladesh Gazette Notification, October 1983 4.2 Establishment of Seed Certification Agency gazette, January 1974 4.3 Evaluation and registration procedures for Hybrid Rice varieties, December 2003 5. MOA Resolution 5.1 Bangladesh Applied Nutrition & Human Resources Development Board 6. Reports of the Committees 6.1 Parliamentary Standing Committee 6.2 National Fertilizer Distribution Committee 6.3 National Fertilizer Standardization Committee 6.4 National Seed Board 6.5 Fertilizer Management for Port 6.6 Pesticide Technical Advisory Committee Box 3.4 Source: Ministry of Agriculture Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges Citizens Charter Ministry of Agriculture has well-defined Citizens Charter which clearly indicates the ministry’s functions and responsibilities, officers in charge of wide range of public services and duties, time limits for final execution of respective responsibilities and procedures for redress of grievances and complaints. Services and duties include not only services for government staff (such as pensions, advances, postings, transfers, promotions, regularization, government procurement, implementation of policies and programs, external trade of agricultural goods, contribution to international organizations, donor’s funds, foreign tours, education and assignments, approval of projects and programs, sanctions and disbursements, staff car, accommodation, residential telephone etc.), but also various services to the farmers and general people (such as distribution of fertilizers, seeds, national awards for agriculture, fixation of prices etc.). 3.4 Policy and Regulatory Framework Achieving self-sufficiency in food grains, in particular rice production has been the overriding objective of agricultural policies in Bangladesh. However, sustainable food security, production of economic and high value crops, development of agro-based industry, meeting nutrition demand of the nation, creation of employment opportunities, development of rural economy, alleviation of poverty, enhancement of agricultural exports etc. remain other major objectives of agricultural policies (Table 3.1). 47 Table 3.1: Synthesis of Agriculture Ministry Policies Major Issues Existing Agriculture Ministry Policy Documents Objective: Create an enabling environment for sustainable growth in agriculture for reducing poverty and ensuring food security through increased production and employment opportunity. Program areas: NAP identifies 9 program areas where actions or policies might be undertaken i.e. Research and Development, Agricultural Extension, Seeds and Planting materials, Fertilizer management, Irrigation, mechanization in Agriculture, Agricultural marketing, Women in Agriculture, Human Resource Development National Agriculture Policy, 2013 Objective: (i) Attainment of self-sufficiency in food grain and increase production of other nutritional crops, (ii) Ensuring sustainable agricultural growth through more efficient and balanced usage of land, water and other resources, (iii) Increasing foreign exchange earnings through agricultural exports, (iv) introducing high value cash crops, (v) Improving quality and availability of seeds (vi) Reducing environmental degradation, (vii) Increasing fish, livestock and forestry production, and (viii) Conserving and developing forest resources. Program areas: The NAEP lists 11 Program areas, called components. These components include efficient extension support to all categories of farmers, decentralization, demand-led extension, working with groups of all kinds, strengthened extension-research linkage, training of extension personnel, appropriate extension methodology, integrated extension activities, coordinate extension activities, and integrated environmental support. New Agricultural Extension Policy Cont. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 48 Major Issues Existing Agriculture Ministry Policy Documents Objective: Enable farmers to grow healthy crops and thereby increase their income on a sustainable basis while improving the environment and community health. Program areas: Maintaining ecological balance, Executing appropriate actions on pesticides, Operating an effective system for implementing the national IPM program, developing human resources as the core of IPM, conducting research on IPM. National Integrated Pest Management Policy 2002 Program areas: Small scale Irrigation Policy identifies 17 program areas where actions or policies might be undertaken i.e. ensure the availability and effective use of irrigation water, expansion of irrigation coverage, reduction of irrigation cost through effective irrigation management, priority to surface water in irrigation works, test the quality of soil and water and determine the availability of irrigation water, increase crop production by using on farm water management technology, increase cropping intensity and crop production through effective irrigation management system, increase crop production through supplementary irrigation and assist the farmers to avail supplementary irrigation during drought season, development of rural economy and alleviation of poverty through encouraging poor, disadvantaged and unemployed young male and female, increase awareness of the farmers about irrigation technology, provide necessary training and technological assistance to promote irrigation skills and repair and maintenance of irrigation machineries, accelerate research in improved irrigation machineries, monitoring of surface water and appropriate irrigation management strategies, ensure optimum utilization of limited water resources through use of modern technologies such as remote sensing, geographical information system and modeling, preparation and regular updating of ground water zoning map on the basis of the quality of ground water level, create region wise (coastal, hill, char, haor, etc.) irrigation system suitable for crops, encourage the use of surface water in areas where it is available, fix irrigation charge considering the kind of machineries and infrastructure, soil quality and crop pattern. Small scale Irrigation Policy Objective: The overall objective of the National Seed Policy is to make the best quality seeds of improved varieties conveniently and efficiently available to farmers with a view to increasing crop production, farmer's productivity, per capita farm income and export earnings. To achieve the objective, the main strategies are: Strengthening the institutional capability of the public and private sector entities and promoting their balanced development by providing equitable opportunities from breeding to marketing of seeds and strengthening seed certification and quality control to ensure availability of quality seeds to farmers. The National Seed Policy, 1993 Program areas: Policy for the Innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety of crops and technologies identifies 6 program areas where actions or policies might be undertaken i.e., Innovation of salinity tolerant High yielding variety and appropriate technologies, Innovation of drought tolerant High yielding variety and appropriate technologies, Innovation of heat tolerant High yielding variety and appropriate technologies, Innovation of flash flood, water-logging and submergence tolerant High yielding variety and appropriate technologies, Innovation of short duration High yielding variety and appropriate technologies, Innovation of low input responsive/nutrient efficient High yielding variety and appropriate technologies. Policy for the Innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety of crops and technologies Contd. Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges 3.5 Interrelations of Policies of the Ministry of Agriculture with National Planning and Policies The policies of the Ministry of Agriculture have been formulated in consistency with the macroeconomic policies indicated under the national level documents such as Vision 2021 and Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015), and also the United Nations documents such as Millennium Development Goals. The preparation of MTSBP has been aligned with the strategies, policies and programs indicated in the Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015), Vision 2021 and Millennium Development Goals (MDG). Crop Sector Related Vision 2021 Vision 2021 is a perspective plan to build Bangladesh a middle income and technology based country by 2021. The salient features of the perspective plans related to agriculture sector stand as follows: 2013: Self-Sufficiency in food. 2021: Contribution of agriculture, industry and service sector to GDP will stand at 15, 40 and 45 percent respectively in place of 22, 28 and 50 percent respectively in 2007. 2021: Labor in agriculture comes down to 30% of the country’s total from 48% at present. 2021: 85% of the population have standard nutritional food. 2021: Poor people ensured a minimum of 2122 kilo calories of food, per capita, per day. SFYP Objectives for Crop Sub-Sector Agriculture plays an important role in achieving economic and social progress in Bangladesh. It is still considered as the lifeline of our economy as 70 percent of rural population directly or indirectly depends on agriculture for their livelihood. The agriculture sector absorbs nearly half of country’s labor force and contributes 19 percent 49 Major Issues Existing Agriculture Ministry Policy Documents Objective: Throughout Bangladesh, deep or shallow tube-well, along with other irrigation machinery is needed in the Aush/Boro/Aman season for the purpose of irrigation; an acceptable irrigation charge rate is appropriate and necessary. Policy for the determination of irrigation charge rate 2009 The NJP is concerned with three specific issues-production of raw jute, development of a commercially viable jute industry sector in the country and promote the export market for both jute and jute products. The report has focused on the following program areas: problems of jute sector, commodity-oriented jute production, improvement of the jute rottening system, improvement of the quality of jute goods, accelerate advertising activities to promote the use of jute goods in both domestic and international market. National Jute Policy Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan to Bangladesh’s gross domestic product. Agriculture, particularly cereals, is the principal source of energy and nutrition intake for the vast majority of our population, particularly rural population. Therefore, the level of farm production and prices are key determinants of poverty and human welfare in Bangladesh. Experts believe that the remarkable progress made by Bangladesh in the field of economic and social development can be largely attributed to the success of agricultural sector. A tripling of agricultural production in three decades, from under 10.0 million tons in the 1970s to 33 million tons in 2010, has reduced the enormous pressure on the national coffer, releasing fiscal resources for critical infrastructure and for human resource development such as education, and health services. Agriculture also contributes significantly to export earnings of (Bangladesh) and its outputs are used as an important source of raw materials for many industries. Rapid growth in agriculture will therefore contribute to the overall economic growth of Bangladesh, which in turn will expand national capacity to create employment opportunities, especially for the poor and public investment in physical and human capital formation, creating a virtuous development cycle. Acceleration of the rate of growth in agriculture to 3.0 percent per annum and above in the new millennium has propelled our GDP growth to over 6 percent in real terms in recent years. In a normal year, Bangladesh is now self-sufficient in rice production. Notwithstanding the remarkable achievement registered by the agricultural sector in food grain production, Bangladesh has been facing persistent challenges in achieving food security for the vast majority of the poor estimated to be around 47 million. Apart from natural disasters, fluctuations of input prices create instability in food grain production and prices. This is further exacerbated by volatility in basic food grain prices in the international market. Sudden increases of the price of staples such as rice and flour reduce the purchasing power of the poor. Since almost half of the rural poor depends on the agriculture sector for employment, the growth of this sector and favorable terms of trade for agricultural commodities are critical for increasing incomes of the poor and to expand their capacity to purchase food. As in many developing countries, Bangladesh tries to maintain a delicate balance between the interests of producers and consumers in food grain prices. Given the land scarcity and rapidly increasing population, Bangladesh has no alternative but to go for vertical integration in the agricultural production system in pursuit of the higher production frontier. Encouraging agricultural growth requires various policies ranging from applying new technologies and extension services to ensuring access to resources by the small and marginal farmers. Availability of quality inputs and their efficient uses are also vital for increasing food grain production and help maintain soil health. Development of marketing infrastructure and diversification of agriculture into higher value products are pre-requisites for raising farm income. Therefore, it is imperative that the public sector plays a pro-active role in delivering key public goods in agriculture, particularly in improving the ability of farmers to adopt new technologies and appropriate mix of incentives to pursue profitable operations. Particular attention would be given to develop and adopt technologies and improved agricultural practices in ecologically vulnerable areas of the southern belt, saline prone areas and flood and drought prone locations. In recognition to women’s contributions to farm activities and agricultural growth (pre- and post-harvest activities, field crop production) special measures would be taken to increase women’s participation in these areas. The main 50 Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges objective of the plan will be to extend the concept of food security well beyond that of basic food grain availability, to make available enough varied and nutritious food and by providing well compensated employment thus ensuring economic access to food by all, particularly for the rural poor. Diversification, commercialization and mechanization of agriculture will also receive greater attention. In addition to these broad targets, the Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015)9 has indicated the following basic objectives of agriculture in Bangladesh.  To attain self-sufficiency in food grain production;  To increase productivity and real income of farming families in rural areas;  To ensure equal wage for men and women labor at agriculture;  To encourage export of vegetables and fruits;  To promote modern farm practices in drought, submergence, saline prone areas;  To encourage research on proper use of genetically modified technology in farms;  To gradually shift HYV, irrigation-fed Boro rice production to the Southern areas;  To utilize irrigated north-eastern uplands for wheat, maize, corn, horticulture;  To emphasize on yield gap reduction for Aus and Aman crops;  To strengthen farming /cropping system based technology transfer;  To increase production of jute by improving jute variety and retting system;  To include oil crops and spices for increased production;  To encourage research and extension for the promotion of pulses crop;  To bring coastal and hilly areas under intensive cultivation;  To ensure efficient and balanced utilization of land, water and other resources;  To encourage comparatively large farm to graduate into commercial farming;  To promote the use of modern technologies with the help of ICT;  To form cooperatives and special growth center only for the actual growers;  To strengthen agricultural mechanization for enhancing production;  To develop crop zoning market based agriculture on the basis of AEZ.  To restore germplasm specially for minor fruits;  To develop community based seed production, storage, and dissemination system;  To strengthen decentralized knowledge based extension system. MDG Strategies for Crop Sector: The Millennium Development Goals has indicated 5 goals for Bangladesh in which the following goal is related to crop sub-sector. GOAL-1: Eradicate Extreme poverty and hunger Target-2: Halve between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger. 51 9 For detailed discussion on challenges and issues, consult Chapter-1 on Strategy for Raising Farm Productivity and Agricultural Growth (pp.1-49) in Part-2 of the Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015), published by the General Economic Division, Planning Commission, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, December 2011. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 3.6 Major Development Issues and Challenges Promoting more rapid agriculture growth is important not only to achieve higher economic growth, but also to lift large number of rural households out of the poverty and unemployment trap. Here are various issues that need to be addressed for development of agriculture production. First is the issue of augmenting investment in agriculture which contributes only 20% of GDP but accounts for 48% of employment and supports nearly two-third of population. The importance of agriculture in the economic, social and political fabric of Bangladesh goes well beyond what is indicated by its contribution to the economy. While agriculture has diversified from food grains into areas such as fruits and vegetables, floriculture, dairy and poultry, there is considerable loss of output due to inadequate storage and transport facilities and lack of sufficient food processing capacities. More public and private investment on these post-harvest activities is required not only to increase value addition in agriculture but also to improve linkages among agricultural development, rural industrialization and development of agro-processing and agro-based industries. It would help in poverty reduction and employment generation, particularly in the rural areas, which is the home of almost 75 per cent of poor households in Bangladesh. Second: Given the vicissitudes caused by weather shocks, especially deficiency in rainfall, there is an urgent need to bring more area under irrigation, which can be regarded as a priority area for agriculture investment. Third: Appropriate measures are required to move gradually away from the subsidy based regime to a more productive and internationally competitive agriculture system. Many economists believe that it may be more productive to develop rural infrastructure 52 Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges rather than providing subsidies on food, fertilizers, power and fuel which are generally open ended and non-targeted. Although in a poor country like Bangladesh it may not be feasible to abolish all these subsidies in the short and even in the medium term, it is necessary to make these subsidies targeted so that the benefits reach the weaker and vulnerable sections of the society, such as small and marginal farmers, farm labor and urban poor. However, considering the administrative and monitoring costs, targeting of all subsidies to directly benefit the poor is a challenging task for the government. Fourth: Agricultural diversification and commercialization is of paramount importance to increase farm income and to guarantee higher wages for the agricultural laborers for rural poverty reduction. Fifth: Despite the progress made during the last two decades, Bangladesh is a net importer of both rice and wheat and is yet to achieve self-sufficiency in food production. It is also a net importer of pulses, edible oils, spices, fruits, sugar, milk and milk products. The total import bill now accounts for over one-fifth of the export earnings of the country. The Sixth Plan emphasizes for import substitution of these crops through promotion of crop diversification. Sixth: Volatility of international prices and fluctuation in production of food items often triggers import demands creating pressure on foreign exchange. Production of import substitute crop agriculture item need to be strategically emphasized. In the recent past, high international prices of food had serious impact on the food security in Bangladesh. The Sixth Plan emphasizes at reducing the dependence on imports for basic necessities such as rice, pulses, oils and sugar to overcome nutritional imbalance and to reduce high inflation of food prices in the domestic market. Seventh: Though intake of food and non-food item has increased over the years, significant gap continues between intake of quality food and non-food item and recommended level. The per capita intake of rice increased over time and reached 477 gm per person per day for rural area and 389 gm for urban area. The intake of potato and vegetables also increased over time and reached 250 gm per person per day, close to the norm for achieving balanced nutrition. But, the intakes of quality food items such as pulses, oils, fish and livestock products remain much below the level recommended by nutritionists for achieving balanced nutrition. In addition, prices of pulses, oils, fish and meat increased at a faster rate than that of rice, indicating growing demand-supply imbalance for non-cereal food items. The Sixth Plan emphasizes on faster growth of non cereal food products to address the issue of unbalanced diet. Such a situation renders diversification of food production and improvement of its quality important. Eighth: Continued decrease of crop area largely due to urbanization and population growth, loss of soil fertility, detrimental effects of climate change, fragmentation of agricultural land holdings, management of irrigation water in the back drop of continued depletion of ground water level, degradation of land are some of the other major challenges that Bangladesh crop agriculture is facing. As mentioned earlier, most of the arable land has been brought under crop production, and crop intensities have shown an increasing trend. Further increase of crop production will depend on increasing yields for various crops. In order to meet the growing demand for food as a result of growing population and urbanization, production of cereal must increase by over 3 Lakh tons per year. The Sixth Plan has recommended multi-pronged objectives, strategy and policies to tackle this issue. 53 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan In addition to these broad challenges, the Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015) has identified a number of development issues for the agriculture sector as indicated in BOX 3.5. A World Bank Report entitled “Bangladesh Public Expenditure and Institutional Review Towards a Better Quality of Public Expenditure” has also identified a set of development challenges faced by Bangladesh Agriculture. These are reproduced in BOX 3.6. 54 Major Development Issues of Bangladesh Agriculture (a) Dominance of cereal food production: National Agriculture Policy 2013, National Agriculture Policy Plan of Action 2004, APB and other major crop sector policy documents mainly focus on food production. (b) Inadequate progress with diversification and commercialization; (c) Lack of modernization of soil and water tests; (d) Lack of modern form of production-contract farming and value chain; (e) Absence of effective linkages among farm and non-farm sectors; (f) Absence of modern technologies to co-opt with climate change; (g) Unstable market prices of agricultural products, which act as a barrier for farmers to select crop-mix for cultivation in the following season/year, (h) Very little stress to agro-based industrialization, (i) Depletion of soil health/ soil fertility, (j) Depletion of underground water table, (k) Unwise development of infrastructures (dams, roads, etc.) blocking drainage, (l) Non-zonal based cultivation and lack of development of market chain, (m) Overlapping of irrigation units with less command area, causing huge loss of underground water and resulting in depletion of ground water table. (n) Overdose of chemical fertilizer by the farmer is a threat to soil health. Box 3.5 Major Challenges of Bangladesh Agriculture (a) "Despite agricultural growth rates averaging 3.7% during 2000-2010, markedly higher than during previous decades, the challenges remain substantial." (b) "Gains in food security at both the national and household level are frequently threatened by the occurrence of supply and price shocks caused by natural disasters." (c) "The impact of frequent natural disasters is compounded by the widespread prevalence of under nutrition and malnutrition." (d) "Beyond the short term, significant increases in agricultural productivity are required for food supply to keep pace with rising demand. Population and income growth continue to put upward pressure on food demand." (e) "Being one of the world's most densely populated countries, there is little scope for area expansion. Future growth will continue to rely on raising yield on major food grains, but yield growth of most crops- including rice- has been stagnating." (f) "Undersupply and underutilization of agricultural inputs, including High-yielding crop seeds, fertilizer, and irrigation contribute to wide gaps between the potential and the realized yields for all crops in the country." Box 3.6 Source: Sixth Five Year Plan, Part-2. Source: “Bangladesh Public Expenditure and Institutional Review- Towards a Better Quality of Public Expenditure” Volume II, World Bank, June 2010. Organizational Structure, Functions, Legal Mandate, Development Issues and Challenges 3.7 Inter-ministry and Intra-Ministry Cross-Cutting Issues and Coordination The Bangladesh Country Investment Plan (CIP) for agriculture, food security and nutrition, prepared jointly by various ministries and divisions and endorsed by the Government of Bangladesh on 14 June 2010 provides a good example of inter- and intra ministry linkages as regards coherent set of priority investment programs to improve food security and nutrition in an integrated manner. It is a comprehensive plan and aims to: “(i) plan and invest resources in a coordinated way; (ii) increase convergence and alignment of budget and external sources of funding, and; (iii) to mobilize additional resources. Proposed investments relate to strengthening physical, institutional and human capacities in the field of agriculture, water management, fisheries, livestock, agricultural marketing, food management, safety nets, nutrition and food safety”. The CIP builds on the solid foundation of the existing policies, strategies and plans in support of food security. In particular, the CIP is based on Accelerated Poverty Reduction II (December 2009), Draft Perspective Plan (2010-2021), Draft Sixth Five Year Plan (2010-2015), the National Food Policy (NFP 2006), 26 areas of intervention contained in the NFP-Plan of Action (PoA 2008-2009), sectoral policy documents10 and the 2010 monitoring report of the NFP-PoA11. Table 3.2 summarizes the programs included under the CIP. The detailed sub-programs and the concerned implementing agencies are summarized in the table 3.2. It may be observed from this table that the Ministry of Agriculture and various Agencies under it are directly involved with the implementation of a number of programs/sub-programs. 55 10 Sector policy documentsinclude the national seed policy, flood action plan, national extension policy, livestock sector road map (2006), the fisheries sector road map (2006), the national disaster management plan (2007-2015) and the Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (2009). 11 The preparation of the NFP-PoA was very inclusive, and the result of joint efforts by the following line Ministries/ Divisions: 1. Ministry of Agriculture 2. Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs 3. Ministry of Environment and Forests 4. Ministry of Finance 5. Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock 6. Ministry of Food and Disaster Management (Food Division and DMR Division) 7. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare 8. Ministry of Industries 9. Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives 10. Ministry of Land 11. Ministry of Social Welfare 12. Ministry of Water Resources 13. Ministry of Women and Children Affairs This effort was carried out in close consultation with private sector representatives, civil society organizations, NGOs, farmer groups and organizations, representatives from research and academia and the Bangladesh Development Partners viz. FAO, USAID and the EU who have been providing capacity building and technical support to the Government over the years. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 56 Table-3.2 Programs and Sub-Programs of the Country Investment Plan for Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition Programs Sub-Programs Main Institutions and Development Partners (DPs) involved Source: Bangladesh Country Investment Plan- A Road Map towards investment in agriculture, food security and nutrition. Strategic Objectives and Ministry Level Performance Indicators 4.1 Vision, Mission, Core Values/Driving Principles of the Ministry of Agriculture Vision Achieving food security for all Mission Ensure food security by increasing production, productivity in the crop sector, improving marketing system as well as diversification of crops and encouraging production of more nutritious crops. C h a p t e r 4 57 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Core Values/ Guiding Principles Attitude: Our team is professional, reliable, committed and fully dedicated. Drive: We are driven by principles to maintain high standards of performance and to deliver excellent services for all stakeholders. Fairness: We act with objectivity, honesty, empathy, impartiality, accountability and transparency. Focus: Our focus is to achieve agricultural development and food security for all. Learning: We have open mind to learning and sharing knowledge and information. Teamwork: We cooperate with one another and our partners to achieve our goals. 4.2 Medium Term Strategic Objectives and Desirable Actions Major Strategic objectives for the Crop Sub-sector The Sixth Plan describes crop sub-sector Strategic Objectives in detail. From overall perspective, we can indicate following major Strategic Objectives for the Crop Sub sector: i. Create enabling environment for agricultural development ii. Enhance production and productivity of crops iii. Enhance accessibility of affordable inputs and credit to farmers iv. Enhance land productivity and promote sustainable land use and environmental conservation v. Promote market access and product development for crops Desirable Actions Notwithstanding short-term policy support contributing to higher crop production, accelerated growth in agriculture in the medium term will depend on a number of policy actions by the government, as indicated in Table 4.1. Strategic Objectives and Ministry Level Performance Indicators 59 Table 4.1 Major Strategic Objectives and Desirable Actions of the Ministry of Agriculture Desirable Actions Major Strategic Objectives  Review, develop and harmonize various agriculture policies;  Review, develop and harmonize legal and regulatory framework;  Advocate fiscal, monetary and other incentives for agriculture;  Advocate appropriate trade and tariff policies consistent with WTO regime  Strengthen public-private partnership in agriculture,  Mainstream poverty reduction and gender issues in agriculture;  Augment public investment in R&D for accelerating technological progress in agriculture;  Improve access to information and use of ICT for agriculture development;  Strengthen linkages among research institutions, extension services and their commercial applications by the farmers, NGOs and local government bodies;  Strengthen client-orientation by decentralizing program development to the upazila level; 1. Create enabling environment for agricultural development  Enhance adaptive research and development activities and effective research-extension linkages for agriculture development  Review and strengthen agricultural extension system and services;  Increase coverage of cultivable land under high yielding varieties and hybrid;  Raise cropping intensity by spread of short duration and hybrid multiple cropping;  Enhance rice production and yields through a breeding strategy focusing on grain quality, shorter maturity and hybrid and/or super rice;  Pursue balanced development of cereal and other crops;  Reduction of pre-harvest and post-harvest crop losses;  Targeted food security programmes;  Crop-specific development programs  Increasing awareness about food value and nutrition through publications, meetings and workshops  Strengthen Monitoring and Evaluation system 2. Enhance production and productivity of crops  Supply adequate quantity of quality inputs at affordable prices  Enhance production of quality seeds of different crops in both public and private sector and strengthen seed monitoring and evaluation activities  Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully level seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence  Ensure supply of quality fertilizers and pesticides at reasonable prices  Ensure access to agriculture credits at affordable interest rates  Expansion of minor irrigation coverage by encouraging optimal use of surface water  Increasing the area of arable land by reducing water logging and sub mergence  Procurement of irrigation machinery and increasing its availability 3. Enhance accessibility of affordable inputs and credit to farmers Contd. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 60 Desirable Actions Major Strategic Objectives  Efficient management of water resources  Appropriate land-use policy and regulation to high agricultural land diversion;  Promote mechanized farming  Promote agriculture in coastal areas and hilly terrains  Application of contemporary science and technology to tackle environmental degradation, soil erosion, climate change, etc.  Identification and classification of soil and land resources through soil survey  Extension of soil test facilities to Upazila and Union level  Popularize the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer among the farmers 4. Enhance land productivity and promote sustainable land use and environmental conservation  Provide market information  Promote market development by strengthening cold storage facilities, transportation system and supply chains for crops  Announcement of appropriate procurement prices for food grains  Development and maintenance of market infrastructure  Providing technological support and technical assistance to agricultural entrepreneurs  Co-ordination with relevant Government department and private sector to expand market reach for agricultural commodities  Exploit potential for diversification into higher-value crops for domestic and external markets  Improve marketing linkages and information networking  Commercialize agriculture production by encouraging forward linkages with agro-based industries 5. Promote market access and product development for crops Table 4.2 Linkages between strategic objectives and major policy documents of the Ministry of Agriculture Policy Document Major Strategic Objectives  All Acts, Policies, Rules and Regulations  Fiscal regime and other government support for agriculture 1. Create enabling environment for agricultural development  National Agriculture Policy,  New Agricultural Extension Policy,  National Integrated Pest Management Policy,  The National Seed Policy of Bangladesh,  Small scale Irrigation Policy,  Policy for the Innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety crops and technologies,  Policy for the determination of irrigation charge rate,  National Jute Policy 2. Enhance production and productivity of crops 4.3 Linking Strategies with Policies Contd. Strategic Objectives and Ministry Level Performance Indicators A combined table indicating the linkages among Strategic objectives, relevant policy documents, desirable actions and related Departments/Agencies to implement those actions are shown in Annex-5. This would facilitate the preparation of Ministry Budget Framework (MBF). 4.4 Ministry-level Performance Indicators The Ministry of Agriculture is primarily concerned with the development of crops within agriculture sector. The Ministry’s MBF identifies the following performance indicators as a result of implementation of the specified activities related to the medium term objectives. (Box 4.1) 61 Desirable Actions Major Strategic Objectives  National Agriculture Policy,  New Agricultural Extension Policy,  The National Seed Policy of Bangladesh,  Small scale Irrigation Policy,  Policy for the innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety crops and technologies,  Policy for the determination of irrigation charge rate 3. Enhance accessibility to affordable input and credit to farmers  National Agriculture Policy,  New Agricultural Extension Policy,  Policy for the innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety crops and technologies 4. Enhance land productivity and promote sustainable land use and environmental conservation  National Agriculture Policy,  New Agricultural Extension Policy,  The National Seed Policy of Bangladesh,  Small scale Irrigation Policy,  Policy for the innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety crops and technologies,  Policy for the determination of irrigation charge rate 5. Promote market access and product development for crops Key Performance Indicators of the Ministry of Agriculture 1. Innovation of technologies and improved varieties of crops 2. Expansion of soil sample testing facilities 3. Expansion of minor irrigation facilities on arable land 4. Production of crops: (a) Rice, (b) Wheat, (c) Pulses and (d) Oil seed 5. Production of cash crops: a) Jute, b) Cotton, c) Sugarcane, d) Potato, e) Spices and f) Maize Box 4.1 Detail year-wise target of Key Performance Indicators in MBF of the Ministry of Agriculture is shown in Annex 4 (Table A4.7). The aforementioned KPIs (Box 4.1) have been selected by the Ministry of Agriculture to attain ministries strategic objectives over long run. An in-depth analysis of the KPIs Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 4.5 Past Trends of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) The Ministry Budget Framework (MBF) deals with Key Performance Indicators (KPI) which are indicators of outputs/outcomes resulting from the projects/programs/activities because in budgeting we are interested to judge the performance of given expenditure i.e. the value for money, irrespective of the composition of physical inputs to produce these outputs. But, in medium term planning we are also interested in examining the availability, quality, delivery and utilization of inputs and to judge their productivity and efficiency.12 Therefore, the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in the Medium Term Strategic Planning include not only the outputs but also the major inputs to produce these outputs and whose delivery falls under the responsibility of the Ministry of Agriculture. Major inputs for crop production include the following: a. Total and net cropped area b. Irrigation c. Fertilizers d. Pesticides and insecticides e. Quality seeds for rice, wheat, pulses, edible oils, jute, potato etc. Table 4.3 indicates that the total cropped area and net cropped area have remained more or less invariant since 2000-01 and there is very little scope to enhance these areas. Therefore, agriculture growth in future will depend on the availability and quality of other inputs for agriculture production such as irrigation, quality seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and agriculture credits. 62 reveals that among five KPIs, expansion of soil sample testing facilities is directly related to realize two strategic objectives of the Ministry namely (i) Enhance production and productivity of crops and (ii) Enhance land productivity and promote sustainable land use and environmental conservation. Another important KPI such as expansion of minor irrigation facilities on arable land is also appropriately aligned with Ministries strategic objectives i.e., enhance production and productivity of crops and accessibility to affordable inputs and credit to farmers. Other than these two KPIs, the remaining three KPIs such as, Innovation of technologies and improved varieties of crops, production of crops: (a) Rice, (b) Wheat, (c) Pulse and (d) Oil seed and production of cash crops: (a) Jute, (b) Cotton, (c) Sugarcane, (d) Potato, (e) Spices and (f) Maize is being reorganized/ rationalized in the following manner to establish clear linkages to achieve strategic objectives of the Ministry over long run. 1. Coverage of areas under improved varieties of crops and technologies (Unit of measurement will be % of total arable land) 2. Coverage of major crop production against demand 3. Coverage of agricultural market information 12 The PFM Guidelines issued by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank and OECD prescribe that for medium term strategic planning the key performance indicators may include suitable indicators for inputs, intermediate outputs, outputs and outcomes. For detailed discussion, consult the following documents: (1) Chap-15, Strengthening Performance in Public Expenditure Management, pp.1-32, in Managing Government Expenditure, by Salvatore Schiavo-Campo and Daniel Tommasi, the ADB, April 1999. (2) Annex D: Performance Indicators for Public Financial Management, pp.136-143, in Public Expenditure Management Handbook, pp.1-193, World Bank, Washington D.C., June 1998. (c) pp.136-138, pp.365-367 and pp.463-465 in Managing Public Expenditure- A Reference Book for Transition Countries, ed. Richard Allen and Daniel Tommasi, OECD, 2001. Strategic Objectives and Ministry Level Performance Indicators Annex Tables A2.1 to A2.3 presents trends of indices of area and production of various crops. It may be observed from these tables that in recent years there had been declining trend of cultivated areas under Aus rice, wheat, pulses, sugarcane, fibers and fruits, whereas there is increasing trend of areas under Aman and Boro rice, maize, oil seeds, spices and condiments. Areas under vegetable production have remained more or less invariant over time. Table 4.4 presents long term trends of Crops GDP at constant (1995-96) market prices and selected agricultural inputs (such as cropped area, irrigated area, pesticides, fertilizer use, quality seeds and agricultural credits) since 1990-91. The Pearson log-linear correlation coefficients between crop (and also horticulture) GDP and agricultural inputs are very high. The high value of the correlation coefficients indicates that these inputs exert significant favorable impact on the production of crops. 63 Table 4.3 Trends of Total and Net Cropped Area Year Forest Not available for cultivation Cultivable Waste Current Fallows Net cropped area Area sown more than once Total cropped area 1989 -90 4703 7783 863 2686 20633 14117 34750 1990 -91 4693 7958 1442 2379 20198 14482 34680 1991 -92 4674 9885 1532 862 19716 14405 34121 1992 -93 4674 10137 1512 928 19418 14438 33856 1993 -94 4674 10355 1566 984 19090 14225 3331 1994 -95 4861 10128 1547 1000 19133 14280 33413 1995 -96 5317 9788 1314 969 19281 14110 33391 1996 -97 5329 9681 1295 963 19401 14688 34089 1997 -98 5572 9268 1241 898 19690 15210 34810 1998 -99 5572 9141 1100 1115 19741 14752 34493 1999 -00 6490 8435 781 862 20101 15166 35267 2000 -01 6490 8427 794 987 19970 15365 35335 2001 -02 6365 8676 799 1005 19824 15252 35076 2002 -03 6418 8685 764 957 19845 15281 35126 2003 -04 6418 8697 736 957 19843 15286 35129 2004 -05 6420 8724 663 1157 19703 15142 34845 2005 -06 6420 8802 640 1518 19289 14655 33944 2006 -07 6420 8835 634 1514 19266 14656 33922 2007 -08 6420 8872 596 1598 19187 15093 34280 2008 -09 6420 8835 572 1171 19621 15993 35614 1989 -90 4703 7783 863 2686 20633 14117 34750 1990 -91 4693 7958 1442 2379 20198 14482 34680 1991 -92 4674 9885 1532 862 19716 14405 34121 1992 -93 4674 10137 1512 928 19418 14438 33856 1993 -94 4674 10355 1566 984 19090 14225 3331 1994 -95 4861 10128 1547 1000 19133 14280 33413 1995 -96 5317 9788 1314 969 19281 14110 33391 1996 -97 5329 9681 1295 963 19401 14688 34089 1997 -98 5572 9268 1241 898 19690 15210 34810 1998 -99 5572 9141 1100 1115 19741 14752 34493 1999 -00 6490 8435 781 862 20101 15166 35267 2000 -01 6490 8427 794 987 19970 15365 35335 2001 -02 6365 8676 799 1005 19824 15252 35076 2002 -03 6418 8685 764 957 19845 15281 35126 2003 -04 6418 8697 736 957 19843 15286 35129 2004 -05 6420 8724 663 1157 19703 15142 34845 2005 -06 6420 8802 640 1518 19289 14655 33944 2006 -07 6420 8835 634 1514 19266 14656 33922 2007 -08 6420 8872 596 1598 19187 15093 34280 2008 -09 6420 8835 572 1171 19621 15993 35614 Year Forest Not available for cultivation Cultivable Waste Current Fallows Net cropped area Area sown more than once Total cropped area Pearson Correlations Coefficients between Crop GDP and Agriculture Inputs Between Area Irrigated Pesticides Fertilizer Seeds Credits Crops GDP 0.669 0.961 0.960 0.763 0.917 0.951 Crops GDP 0.669 0.961 0.960 0.763 0.917 0.951 Pearson Correlations Coeffff icients between Crop GDP and Agriculture Inputs Between Area Irrigated Pesticides Fertilizer Seeds Credits Source: Prepared on the basis of primary data given in various issues of Agriculture Statistics, B.B.S. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan We have also fitted exponential time trends and statistical equations showing relations between crop GDP and various inputs. The detailed results are given in Annex Table A3.1, which indicate that the crop-GDP has very high correlation and significant elasticity’s with most of the agriculture inputs and outputs. The exponential time trends for area, production and yields for various crops indicate increasing trends except for areas and production for Aus and Aman rice, wheat, pulses, oilseeds and sugarcane. The coefficient of variation (CV) for most of the variables is very high. This implies that the areas, production and yields for various crops are unstable over time due to uncertainties and risks caused by unfavorable monsoons and natural disasters. 64 Table 4.4: Long Term Trends of Crops GDP at Constant prices and Selected Agricultural Inputs during 1990-91 to 2010-11 Crops GDP Cropped Area Irrigated Area Pesticides Fertilizer Use Seeds Credits Year Taka Acres % of total Area '000 tons Tons Tons Taka 1990 -91 243.2 34.7 21.58 7.15 2.11 27.95 5.96 1991 -92 245.9 34.1 23.40 7.45 2.29 28.89 7.95 1992 -93 248.3 33.9 23.75 7.66 2.32 27.82 8.42 1993 -94 244.2 33.3 24.40 7.85 2.22 21.59 11.00 1994 -95 235.8 33.4 25.36 9.22 2.64 29.44 14.90 1995 -96 239.9 33.4 26.30 11.22 3.02 37.11 14.82 1996 -97 255.4 34.1 26.59 11.37 3.04 34.47 15.17 1997 -98 258.1 34.8 26.76 11.61 2.62 27.87 16.43 1998 -99 266.1 34.5 28.22 14.34 2.82 34.02 30.06 1999 -00 287.7 35.3 31.60 15.63 2.83 29.48 28.51 2000 -01 30 5.5 35.3 31.54 15.40 2.89 36.27 30.20 2001 -02 298.2 35.1 33.82 17.39 3.29 37.15 29.55 2002 -03 306.8 35.1 33.91 18.08 3.30 33.96 32.78 2003 -04 319.9 35.1 33.98 22.12 3.36 38.31 40.48 2004 -05 320.3 34.8 38.05 25.47 3.76 45.13 49.57 2005 -06 336.4 33 .9 39.46 31.52 3.68 55.60 54.96 2006 -07 351.3 33.9 40.07 37.71 3.55 76.12 52.93 2007 -08 360.7 34.3 41.86 48.69 4.09 74.13 85.81 2008 -09 375.2 35.6 41.31 45.17 3.01 91.79 92.84 2009 -10 398.2 35.8 39.32 42.24 3.13 103.57 111.17 2010 -11 419.7 36.1 50.99 43.55 3.82 130.94 121.84 1990 -91 243.2 34.7 21.58 7.15 2.11 27.95 5.96 1991 -92 245.9 34.1 23.40 7.45 2.29 28.89 7.95 1992 -93 248.3 33.9 23.75 7.66 2.32 27.82 8.42 1993 -94 244.2 33.3 24.40 7.85 2.22 21.59 11.00 1994 -95 235.8 33.4 25.36 9.22 2.64 29.44 14.90 1995 -96 239.9 33.4 26.30 11.22 3.02 37.11 14.82 1996 -97 255.4 34.1 26.59 11.37 3.04 34.47 15.17 1997 -98 258.1 34.8 26.76 11.61 2.62 27.87 16.43 1998 -99 266.1 34.5 28.22 14.34 2.82 34.02 30.06 1999 -00 287.7 35.3 31.60 15.63 2.83 29.48 28.51 2000 -01 30 5.5 35.3 31.54 15.40 2.89 36.27 30.20 2001 -02 298.2 35.1 33.82 17.39 3.29 37.15 29.55 2002 -03 306.8 35.1 33.91 18.08 3.30 33.96 32.78 2003 -04 319.9 35.1 33.98 22.12 3.36 38.31 40.48 2004 -05 320.3 34.8 38.05 25.47 3.76 45.13 49.57 2005 -06 336.4 33 .9 39.46 31.52 3.68 55.60 54.96 2006 -07 351.3 33.9 40.07 37.71 3.55 76.12 52.93 2007 -08 360.7 34.3 41.86 48.69 4.09 74.13 85.81 2008 -09 375.2 35.6 41.31 45.17 3.01 91.79 92.84 2009 -10 398.2 35.8 39.32 42.24 3.13 103.57 111.17 2010 -11 419.7 36.1 50.99 43.55 3.82 130.94 121.84 Crops GDP Cropped Area Irrigated Area Pesticides Fertilizer Use Seeds CreditsYear Taka Acres % of total Area '000 tons Tons Tons Taka Source: Primary data given in various issues of Agriculture Statistics, B.B.S. Strategic Objectives and Ministry Level Performance Indicators 4.6 Projections of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Ministry Budget Framework (MBF) for the years 2012-13 to 2016-17 prepared by the Agriculture Ministry provides the projections of major outputs within the resource constraints provided by the Finance Division for preparing the MBF. However, there are no projections for inputs, which form an integral component of MTSBP. Here we have adopted the standard statistical techniques on the basis of time series data for the projection of both input KPIs and output KPIs which are consistent with the Sixth Five Year Plan. The methodology, data base and the projections are discussed in detail in Annex A4.1 to A4.6. The projections are summarized here in Table 4.5. 65 Table 4.5: Projections of KPIs of the Ministry of Agriculture (Production in million metric tonnes) Items 2010 2011 2011 12 P*2012 2013 P*2013 2014 P*2014 2015 P*2015 2016 P*2016 2017 Ave GR Aus Rice Prod 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 -0.02 Aman Rice Prod 12.79 12.91 13.02 13.14 13.26 13.38 13.50 0.91 Boro Rice Prod 18.62 18.99 19.37 19.76 20.15 20.55 20.97 2.00 Total Rice Prod 33.54 34.03 34.53 35.03 35.54 36.07 36.60 1.46 Wheat Prod 0.97 0.99 1.01 1.03 1.05 1.07 1.09 2.00 Pulses Prod 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.26 2.00 Oilseeds Prod 0.84 0.90 0.97 1.04 1.12 1.20 1.29 7.40 Spices Prod 1.47 1.61 1.76 1.92 2.09 2.28 2.49 9.18 Sugarcane Prod 4.67 4.81 4.96 5.10 5.26 5.41 5.58 3.00 Jute Prod 1.52 1.57 1.62 1.68 1.73 1.79 1.85 3.31 Potato Prod 8.33 9.12 9.99 10.94 11.98 13.12 14.37 9.51 Maize Prod 1.00 1.12 1.26 1.41 1.58 1.77 1.98 12.00 Input KPIs (Area in ‘000 Acres, seeds and fertilizers in ‘000 tons and credits in lakh taka) Aus Rice Area 2750 2680 2612 2546 2481 2418 2357 -2.54 Aman Rice Area 13951 13907 13862 13818 13775 13731 13687 -0.32 Boro Rice Area 11788 12068 12355 12648 12949 13257 13572 2.38 Rice Area 28489 28655 28829 29012 29204 29405 29615 0.65 Wheat Area 923 932 942 951 960 970 980 1.00 Pulses Area 627 633 640 646 652 659 666 1.00 Oilseeds Area 1300 1330 1361 1393 1425 1458 1492 2.32 Spices Area 850 875 901 928 956 984 1013 2.97 Sugarcane Area 287 293 299 305 311 317 323 2.00 Jute Area 1751 1781 1811 1842 1873 1905 1938 1.70 Potato Area 1137 1207 1281 1360 1443 1532 1626 6.15 Maize Area 425 459 496 535 578 624 674 8.00 Agrl Credits 12184 13884 15821 18028 20543 23408 26674 13.95 Aus Rice Prod 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 2.13 -0.02 Aman Rice Prod 12.79 12.91 13.02 13.14 13.26 13.38 13.50 0.91 Boro Rice Prod 18.62 18.99 19.37 19.76 20.15 20.55 20.97 2.00 Total Rice Prod 33.54 34.03 34.53 35.03 35.54 36.07 36.60 1.46 Wheat Prod 0.97 0.99 1.01 1.03 1.05 1.07 1.09 2.00 Pulses Prod 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.26 2.00 Oilseeds Prod 0.84 0.90 0.97 1.04 1.12 1.20 1.29 7.40 Spices Prod 1.47 1.61 1.76 1.92 2.09 2.28 2.49 9.18 Sugarcane Prod 4.67 4.81 4.96 5.10 5.26 5.41 5.58 3.00 Jute Prod 1.52 1.57 1.62 1.68 1.73 1.79 1.85 3.31 Potato Prod 8.33 9.12 9.99 10.94 11.98 13.12 14.37 9.51 Maize Prod 1.00 1.12 1.26 1.41 1.58 1.77 1.98 12.00 Input KPIs (Area in ‘000 AcAA res, seeds and feff rtilizers in ‘000 tons and credits in lakh taka) Aus Rice Area 2750 2680 2612 2546 2481 2418 2357 -2.54 Aman Rice Area 13951 13907 13862 13818 13775 13731 13687 -0.32 Boro Rice Area 11788 12068 12355 12648 12949 13257 13572 2.38 Rice Area 28489 28655 28829 29012 29204 29405 29615 0.65 Wheat Area 923 932 942 951 960 970 980 1.00 Pulses Area 627 633 640 646 652 659 666 1.00 Oilseeds Area 1300 1330 1361 1393 1425 1458 1492 2.32 Spices Area 850 875 901 928 956 984 1013 2.97 Sugarcane Area 287 293 299 305 311 317 323 2.00 Jute Area 1751 1781 1811 1842 1873 1905 1938 1.70 Potato Area 1137 1207 1281 1360 1443 1532 1626 6.15 Maize Area 425 459 496 535 578 624 674 8.00 Agrl Credits 12184 13884 15821 18028 20543 23408 26674 13.95 Items 2010 2011 2011 12 P*2012 2013 P*2013 2014 P*2014 2015 P*2015 2016 P*2016 2017 AvAA e GR Contd. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Note: P*= Projection The projections presented in Table 4.5 are based on the following set of assumptions: 1. There will be no major monsoon failures or no internal or external shocks during the planning period which might have adverse impact on agriculture. 2. The Government will continue to pursue the existing favorable policy package for agriculture. 3. Past trends and pattern of crop production and areas under cultivation of various crops will continue in future. It may be observed from Table 4.5 that the projected KPIs for some of the outputs (such as rice and wheat) are significantly different from those projected under the MBF for the Budget 2012-13 presented in Annex Table A4.7. The differences are due to the following reasons: a. Coverage and definitions of crops are different as our analysis is based on the data obtained from the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. b. Our projections are consistent with the Sixth Five Year Plan target of about 5 percent growth rate for the crops and horticulture sub-sector within agriculture. c. As MBF projections are made within MTBF expenditure ceilings for the Agriculture Ministry, there is no guarantee that the Sixth Plan targets will be realized either for the crops sub-sector or for the overall agriculture sector. 4.7 Foodgrains Requirements for Food Security As indicated earlier the Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan of the Ministry of Agriculture has been prepared with a Mission “to ensure food security for all” embedded in the Vision “to achieve self-sufficiency in food production”. In a globalised economy with free trade and movement of goods, services, capital and manpower, self-sufficiency in the agriculture sector means that the sector should be able to finance imports of food-grains and other raw materials and machinery with the help of foreign exchange generated by 66 Urea 2253 2266 2279 2291 2304 2318 2331 0.57 TSP 435 425 415 405 396 386 377 -2.35 MOP 365 378 391 404 418 432 447 3.45 Gypsum 105 103 101 100 98 96 95 -1.73 Fertilizer 3817 3852 3888 3924 3960 3997 4034 0.93 Aus paddy Seed 49 42 36 30 26 22 19 -14.82 Aman Seed 139 153 168 185 203 224 246 10.01 Boro paddy Seed 118 123 127 132 138 143 148 3.90 Total Paddy seed 306 322 339 357 375 395 416 5.27 Wheat Seed 39 41 43 44 46 48 50 4.03 Urea 2253 2266 2279 2291 2304 2318 2331 0.57 TSP 435 425 415 405 396 386 377 -2.35 MOP 365 378 391 404 418 432 447 3.45 Gypsum 105 103 101 100 98 96 95 -1.73 Fertrr ilizer 3817 3852 3888 3924 3960 3997 4034 0.93 Aus paddy Seed 49 42 36 30 26 22 19 -14.82 Aman Seed 139 153 168 185 203 224 246 10.01 Boro paddy Seed 118 123 127 132 138 143 148 3.90 Total Paddy seed 306 322 339 357 375 395 416 5.27 Wheat Seed 39 41 43 44 46 48 50 4.03 Items 2010 2011 2011 12 P*2012 2013 P*2013 2014 P*2014 2015 P*2015 2016 P*2016 2017 Ave GR Items 2010 2011 2011 12 P*2012 2013 P*2013 2014 P*2014 2015 P*2015 2016 P*2016 2017 AvAA e GR Strategic Objectives and Ministry Level Performance Indicators the exports of the sector. Food security means that the domestic production of food grains should be sufficient to meet the domestic demand for food grains without any resort to imports. So we need to estimate and project demand for foodgrains to ensure food security for all. As per international best practices for demand projections for food grains, total requirements for food grains consist of two parts- direct demand and indirect demand. Direct demand for food grains implies human demand for food grains for basic needs of calories for survival and getting energy for works. Indirect demand for food grains consists of requirements for seeds, pre-harvest and post-harvest loss, transit loss, feeds for animal husbandry, poultry and fishery, requirements by hotels, restaurants, bakeries and food processing and agro-based industries. Table 4.6 indicates the average per capita per day food (grams) and calorie intake of a citizen of Bangladesh during 2010 as per the “Household Income and Expenditure Survey, 2010” conducted by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). According to this survey, the average per capita consumption of cereals amounted to 463.9 grams per day. Another survey conducted by the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) in 2011 indicated that the average consumption of food grains was 501.26 grams per day per person. Source: Household Income and Expenditure Survey, 2010. Note: * includes tea, soft drinks, bread, biscuits, betel nuts, betel leaves, etc. Projections of Food Grains Demand On the basis of basic data and information collected from the Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE), Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) and Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) we estimate food grains requirements during 2001-2011 67 Table-4.6 Average per capita per day food (grams) and calorie intake of A citizen of Bangladesh, 2010 Food Item Grams Percentage Kilo calorie Percentage Cereals (Rice, wheat, others) 463.9 46.4 1617.2 69.7 Potato 70.3 7.0 68.2 2.9 Vegetables 166.1 16.6 89.1 3.8 Pulses 14.3 1.4 50.2 2.2 Milk/milk products 33.7 3.4 27.4 1.2 Edible oil 20.5 2.1 184.1 7.9 Meat/Poultry/Eggs 26.2 2.6 33.8 1.5 Fish 49.5 5.0 66.1 2.9 Condiments/ Spices 66.0 6.6 67.9 2.9 Fruits 44.7 4.5 31.1 1.3 Sugar 8.1 0.8 33.5 1.4 Miscellaneous* 36.5 3.6 49.9 2.2 Total 1000.0 100.0 2318.3 100.0 Cereals (Rice, wheat, others) 463.9 46.4 1617.2 69.7 Potato 70.3 7.0 68.2 2.9 Vegetables 166.1 16.6 89.1 3.8 Pulses 14.3 1.4 50.2 2.2 Milk/milk products 33.7 3.4 27.4 1.2 Edible oil 20.5 2.1 184.1 7.9 Meat/Poultry/Eggs 26.2 2.6 33.8 1.5 Fish 49.5 5.0 66.1 2.9 Condiments/ Spices 66.0 6.6 67.9 2.9 Fruits 44.7 4.5 31.1 1.3 Sugar 8.1 0.8 33.5 1.4 Miscellaneous* 36.5 3.6 49.9 2.2 Total 1000.0 100.0 2318.3 100.0 Food Item Grams Percentage Kilo calorie Percentage Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan and project food grains demand for the period 2012-2016. These results are given in Table 4.7. These estimates and projections are based on the following assumptions: i. Direct food grain demand is calculated @501.26 gm per day per head (as per BIDS Study, 2011). ii. Indirect demand includes seed, wastage, feed for animal husbandry, fisheries and poultry, and requirements by the food processing industries, hotels, restaurants, bakeries, which together is assumed to be 14.5 percent of gross food grains output (as per BIDS study 2011). iii. Buffer stocks are assumed to be 3 million tonnes w.e.f. 2011-12. It may be observed from the table 4.7 that complete food security will be reached by 2015. However, if we ignore the need for building a minimum level of buffer stock to take care of adverse impact of unfavorable monsoons and natural disasters, the country is already on the verge of attaining food security for all. Table 4.7: Food grain Production and Requirement (2000-01 to 2016-17) (thousand metric tons) Production Import/ Aid Year Mid-Year Populati on (Million) Direct Demand Indirect Demand Buffer Stock Food grains total Demand Rice Wheat Maize Total (Rice+ wheat) Availabi lity Gap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2000-01 132 24059 3902 0 27961 25085 1673 149 26907 1554 28461 1554 2001-02 133 24416 3781 0 28197 24300 1606 172 26078 1799 27877 1799 2002-03 135 24700 3896 0 28596 25188 1507 175 26870 3221 30091 3221 2003-04 136 24919 4014 0 28933 26190 1253 241 27684 2799 30483 2799 2004-05 138 25258 3841 0 29099 25157 976 356 26489 3375 29864 3375 2005-06 139 25450 4032 0 29482 26553 735 522 27810 2459 30269 2459 2006-07 142 25980 4197 0 30177 27318 725 899 28942 2420 31362 2420 2007-08 144 26346 4513 0 30859 28931 844 1346 31121 3457 34578 3457 2008-09 146 26712 4769 0 31481 31317 844 730 32891 3013 35904 3013 2009-10 148 27078 4946 0 32024 32257 969 887 34113 3454 37567 3454 2010-11 150 27444 5229 0 32673 33541 972 1552 36065 5313 41378 5313 2011-12 152 27812 5111 3000 35923 34030 982 236 35248 1855 37103 1855 2012-13 154 28222 5215 3000 36437 34526 992 450 35968 469 36437 469 Projected Imports 2013-14 157 28633 5319 3000 36952 35031 1001 650 36682 270 36952 270 2014-15 159 29045 5409 3000 37454 35544 1011 750 37305 149 37454 149 2015-16 161 29457 5501 3000 37958 36067 1022 850 37939 19 37958 19 2016-17 163 29872 5594 3000 38466 36598 1032 950 38580 -114 38466 -114 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2000-01 132 24059 3902 0 27961 25085 1673 149 26907 1554 28461 1554 2001-02 133 24416 3781 0 28197 24300 1606 172 26078 1799 27877 1799 2002-03 135 24700 3896 0 28596 25188 1507 175 26870 3221 30091 3221 2003-04 136 24919 4014 0 28933 26190 1253 241 27684 2799 30483 2799 2004-05 138 25258 3841 0 29099 25157 976 356 26489 3375 29864 3375 2005-06 139 25450 4032 0 29482 26553 735 522 27810 2459 30269 2459 2006-07 142 25980 4197 0 30177 27318 725 899 28942 2420 31362 2420 2007-08 144 26346 4513 0 30859 28931 844 1346 31121 3457 34578 3457 2008-09 146 26712 4769 0 31481 31317 844 730 32891 3013 35904 3013 2009-10 148 27078 4946 0 32024 32257 969 887 34113 3454 37567 3454 2010-11 150 27444 5229 0 32673 33541 972 1552 36065 5313 41378 5313 2011-12 152 27812 5111 3000 35923 34030 982 236 35248 1855 37103 1855 2012-13 154 28222 5215 3000 36437 34526 992 450 35968 469 36437 469 Projo ected Imports 2013-14 157 28633 5319 3000 36952 35031 1001 650 36682 270 36952 270 2014-15 159 29045 5409 3000 37454 35544 1011 750 37305 149 37454 149 2015-16 161 29457 5501 3000 37958 36067 1022 850 37939 19 37958 19 2016-17 163 29872 5594 3000 38466 36598 1032 950 38580 -114 38466 -114 Production Import/ Aid Year Mid-Year Populati on (Million) Direct Demand Indirect Demand Buffff eff r Stock Food grains total Demand Rice Wheat Maize Total (Rice+ wheat) AvAA ailabi lity Gap Source of Basic Data: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) and Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE). 68 Strategic Objectives and Ministry Level Performance Indicators Alternative Projections of Food Grains Demand An attempt was made to estimate demand separately for each of major cereals viz. rice, wheat, potato and pulses. The projections and the underlying assumptions are given in Tables 4.8A to 4.8D. The projections from two sources differ for some crops but lead to the same conclusion that Bangladesh is on the verge of attaining complete food security in near future. 69 Table 4.8 A: Projected Demand for Rice in next five years (lakh metric tons) Uses 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 2015 -16 2016 -17 1. Human consumption 227 231 234 237 240 243 2. Post -harvest lost (assumed to be 5% of gross production) 16.8 16.9 17.0 17.0 17.1 17.2 3. Food processing industry (assumed to be 1% of gross production) 3.35 3.37 3.39 3.40 3.40 3.40 4. Seeds and wastage, feed, private stocking (assumed to be 12% of gross production) 40.2 40.5 41.0 41.5 42.0 42.0 5. Buffer stock by government 12.5 13 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 6. Total demand 299.8 304.8 308.9 312.9 317.0 320.6 1. Human consumption 227 231 234 237 240 243 2. Post -harvrr est lost (assumed to be 5% of gross production) 16.8 16.9 17.0 17.0 17.1 17.2 3. Food processing industry (assumed to be 1% of gross production) 3.35 3.37 3.39 3.40 3.40 3.40 4. Seeds and wastage, feed, private stocking (assumed to be 12% of gross production) 40.2 40.5 41.0 41.5 42.0 42.0 5. Buffff er stock by government 12.5 13 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 6. Total demand 299.8 304.8 308.9 312.9 317.0 320.6 Uses 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 2015 -16 2016 -17 Table 4.8 B: Projected Demand for Wheat in next five years (lakh metric tons) Uses 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1. Human consumption 14.2 14.4 14.6 14.8 15.0 15.2 2. Food processing industry (assumed to be 25 lakh ton per annum) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 3. Seeds and wastage, feed, private stocking (assumed to be about 12% of gross production) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 4. Buffer stock by government - - - - - 5. Total demand 40.4 40.6 40.8 41.0 41.2 41.4 1. Human consumption 14.2 14.4 14.6 14.8 15.0 15.2 2. Food processing industryrr (assumed to be 25 lakh ton per annum) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 3. Seeds and wastage, feed, private stocking (assumed to be about 12% of gross production) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 4. Buffff er stock by government - - - - - 5. Total demand 40.4 40.6 40.8 41.0 41.2 41.4 Uses 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Table 4.8 C: Projected Demand for Potato in next five years (lakh metric tons) Uses 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 201 5-16 2016 -17 1. Human consumption 38.4 39.0 39.5 40.0 40.6 41.1 2. Post-harvest lost (assumed to be around 20% of gross production) 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 3. Food processing industry (assumed to be 10% of gross production) 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 4. Seeds and wastage, feed, private stocking 8.0 8.3 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.6 5. Total demand 71.3 72.2 72.9 73.5 74.1 74.5 1. Human consumption 38.4 39.0 39.5 40.0 40.6 41.1 2. Post-harvrr est lost (assumed to be around 20% of gross production) 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 3. Food processing industry (assumed to be 10% of gross production) 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 4. Seeds and wastage, feed, private stocking 8.0 8.3 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.6 5. Total demand 71.3 72.2 72.9 73.5 74.1 74.5 Uses 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 201 5-16 2016 -17 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 70 Table 4.8 D: Projected Demand for Pulses in next five years (lakh metric tons) Uses 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1. Human consumption 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.3 8.4 2. Food processing industry (assumed to be 1% of gross production) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 3. Seeds and wastage, feed, private stocking (assumed to be 12% of gross production) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 4. Buffer stock by government - - - - - 5. Total demand 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.6 8.7 1. Human consumption 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.3 8.4 2. Food processing industryrr (assumed to be 1% of gross production) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 3. Seeds and wastage, feed, private stocking (assumed to be 12% of gross production) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 4. Buffff er stock by government - - - - - 5. Total demand 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.6 8.7 Uses 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Programs/Projects and Financing Needs 5.1 Identification of Programs/Projects/Activities and Linkages with Policies The Ministry Budget Framework (MBF) prepared as a part of medium term budgeting provides yearly allocations of expenditure for all approved and unapproved projects/ programs/activities for the budget year and four forward years. But the allocations are made on the basis of Ministry/Division wise financial ceilings provided by the Finance Division on the basis of anticipated resources to be available over the medium term. However, the basic objective of the Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan is to consider all desirable programs/projects/activities of the Ministry of Agriculture over the planning horizon in order to achieve the stated strategic objectives. So in the MTSBP we have considered both approved and anticipated projects/programs/activities for establishing an effective linkage between the policy documents and a realistic expenditure plan for the Ministry of Agriculture and its subordinate departments and agencies. Particularly efforts have been made to conceive all feasible projects and programs which could be implemented by the Agencies/Departments. C h a p t e r 5 71 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Ideas and concepts of project/programs originate from many sources like the Ministry/ Division, Development Partners, implementing agencies, sector Divisions of the Planning Commission and monitoring and implementation reports by the IMED etc. All such concepts have been examined thoroughly before identifying the desired programs/ projects. But, the main responsibility of subsequent preparation of detailed program/ project proposals through the standard DPP and RDPP for Development Projects and TPP and RTPP for Technical Assistance Projects, as prescribed by the Planning Commission13, will remain with the implementing Ministries/Divisions/Agencies. List of on-going and proposed programs/projects/activities are shown separately in the Annex-6 (on-going projects are in tables A6.1.1 to A6.1.15, listed expected projects in tables A6.2.1 to A6.2.11 and priority area wise projects are in A6.3.1 to A6.3.6). Strategy and business plan by any Line Ministry/Division should assist the Medium Term Budget process by the Finance Division. To do so, new programs/projects/activities which are either being conceived or in the pipelines are also shown in the medium term strategy and business plan. Subsequently detailed pre-feasibility studies and cost-benefit analysis as per established procedures and formats set out by the Planning Commission will be prepared for their usual appraisal by the Line Ministry, Planning Commission and the ECNEC before these are included in the budget for a particular year during the planning period. Therefore, the proposed total expenditures for all projects/programs/activities (including unapproved ones) may exceed the MTBF expenditure ceilings set out by the Finance Division in order to allow for strategic assessments and selections of projects/ programs by the Line Ministries/ Divisions. Finance Division and the Planning Commission subsequently can select the projects/programs according to their priority set out in the MTSBP and within the budget ceiling during the budget process. However, efforts have been made and due care has been taken to make the planned expenditures realistic and implementable by the ministry and its agencies. In fact, the yearly MTSBP expenditures are more or less comparable to the planned development expenditures projected under the Sixth Five Year Plan (2011-2015). In order to identify and specify the projects and programs over time, a Technical Committee comprising the heads of all Departments and Agencies and representatives of the budget and planning wings was formed by the Ministry/Division with the head of the Policy Planning Wing as convenor. A combination of top-down and bottom-up approach was adopted to finalize the lists of projects and programs included in the MTSBP. Initially certain guidelines were discussed by the Technical Committee and the Agencies and Departments were encouraged to come up with the list of appropriate and desirable projects and programs which would best satisfy their stated strategic objectives. These were further discussed in the meetings of the Technical Committee and modifications were suggested. The top-down and bottom-up consultations moved back and forth until a convergence was reached and proposals were approved by all the members of the Technical Committee. 72 13 It is well known that the Planning Commission (PC) prepares and circulates procedures and general guidelinesfor preparation, appraisal and approval of projects (see Project Preparation, Processing, Approval and Revision Procedures for Public Sector, pp.1-90, Planning Commission, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2008). Line Ministries and Divisions are required to submit project proposals in the prescribed format of Development Project Proforma/ Proposal (DPP) and Revised DPP (RDPP) for Development Projects, and Technical Project Proforma/ Proposal (TPP) and Revised TPP (RTPP) for Technical Assistance Projects funded by the donors. Programs/Projects and Financing Needs These tables also provide information on the starting and completion years of projects/programs, total project cost, dominant strategic objectives, major activities, dominant outputs and sources of funding. 5.2 Prioritization of Programs/Projects At present, under MTBF system, Ministry Budget Framework (MBF) for Ministry/Division provide information of on-going and expected projects/programs for the budget year and four forward years. However, all these projects/programs are regarded as priority projects/programs and prepared within the ceiling set by the Finance Division. For the preparation of MTSBP, no such explicit ceiling has been set, though, there may be implicit ceiling on financing depending on constraints of other inputs such as manpower, ICT, capacity building, etc. In the MTSBP, programs/projects are graded as “High priority (HP)”, “Medium Priority (MP)” and “Low Priority (LP)”. In determining the priorities of projects and programs included in the MTSBP, due considerations were given to National and Ministry/Division level Policy, Planning documents, Vision, Mission, strategic objectives of concerned Ministry/Division. The priorities were also guided by the standard guidelines issued by the Planning Commission for inclusion of projects for the Annual Development Programme (ADP) and guidelines of the Finance Division for inclusion of programs. These guidelines clearly indicate priority areas which include a variety of factors such poverty alle viation, employment genera tion, training-based human resource development, rural livelihood programs, develop ment of backward areas, development of SMEs, infra structure development, ICT and digitization, environment friendly projects, rehabilitation of damages caused by natural calamities, agro-based indus tries, self-employment, rural development, food security, nutrition, empower-ment of women, expansion of exports, water management, expan sion of irrigation, etc. As indicated earlier all the pro-posals and priorities put forward by the Agencies and Departments were extensively debated and discussed in the Ministry level Technical Committee meetings and unanimous decisions were taken in the meeting. Annex 6 indicates priorities of all projects included under the MTSBP and probable year of starting of those projects during MTSBP period which will be helpful to match between resource allocation given by the Finance Division and Ministries demand for resources to implement those projects. 73 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 5.3 Policy Choices for Implementation of Programs/Projects/ Activities and Sources of Financing While discussing sources of financing and implementation of projects/programs, the Technical Committee explored various policy options such as the following:  Private Sector & NGO Participation  Public-Private Partnership (PPP)14  Activities to be implemented by the Government  Activities to be implemented by the Donor agencies or Development partners It may be observed from tables in Annex-6 that all the projects/programs/activities will be financed and implemented by the government and Donor agencies or Development partners. However, private and NGO participation will be explored for implementation of some of the projects/programs in order to achieve better efficiency and effectiveness of projects and to share costs and risks involved in execution of projects/programs/ activities. 5.4 Annual Business Plan for Projects (Department/Agency wise Medium Term Costing of Development Projects) Annex 6 indicate year-wise expenditures for all projects/programs included under the MTSBP for the period 2012-2013 to 2016-2017 (On-going projects cost are shown in tables A6.1.1 to A6.1.15, listed expected projects cost in tables from A6.2.1 to A6.2.11 and priority area wise projects cost are shown in A6.3.1 to A6.3.6). Project wise activities and dominant outputs are also presented in these tables. 5.5 Trends of Agriculture Ministry Budget, Actual Expenditure and Medium Term Costing of Development and Non-development Expenditure Before discussing the projected expenditures for the MTSBP period, it is interesting to observe the trends of developmental, non-developmental and overall budget for the Ministry of Agriculture during the past five years from 2007-08 to 2011-12 as given in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. It is observed that total Budget allocation, both Development and Non-Development of MOA increased during the past five years from 2007-08 to 2011-12 (Table 5.2). It may also be observed that despite very good absorption capacity and budget implementation records by the Ministry of Agriculture, the share of the MOA has shown a declining trend in overall development budget, non-development budget, 74 14 It may be mentioned here that there are detailed guidelines on "POLICY AND STRATEGY FOR PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP), 2010" issued by the government on August 2, 2010. These guidelines clearly indicate the objectives, basic concepts, applicability, sectoral coverage, eligibility of the private sector, investment size, types of financial participation by the private sector, linked components, incentives to private sector, institutional framework, composition of Public-Private Partnership Advisory Council (PPPAC), roles of the LMs/ FD/ Planning Commission, methods and procedures for formulation, appraisal and approval of projects, exit policy, disclosure of information, investment targets under the Five Year Plan, and procedures and methods for small and large projects under public-private partnership. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan recurrent budget, capital budget and total budget of the government (Table 5.1). This may be due to higher needs for other sectors such as energy, power, education and health. The ratio of MOA expenditure in total government revenue, overall GDP and crop sector GDP has also remain stagnant over the years (Table 5.1). However, on considering the strategic importance of the MOA for ensuring food security and also for poverty alleviation, Finance Division may consider higher allocation for MOA. Agency-wise projected development and non-developmental expenditures per year over the planning horizon (2012-13 to 2016-17) are presented in Tables 5.4 and 5.5 respectively. The results are summarized in Table-5.3 which indicates that projected expenditures of the Ministry of Agriculture are expected to rise from Taka 9777.9 crore (amounting to 9.52% of Crops GDP) in 2012-13 to Taka 13978 crore (amounting to 9.95% of Crops GDP) in 2015-16 and Taka 15382.2 crore (amounting to 9.87% of Crops GDP) in 2016-17. 75 Fiscal Year MOA Budget as % of total Budget MOA Developme nt Budget as % of total Developme nt Budget MOA Non Developme nt Budget as % of total Non Developme nt Budget MOA Recurrent Budget as % of total Recurrent Budget MOA Capital Budget as % of total capital Budget MOA Budget as % of total Revenue MOA Budge t as % of GDP MOA Budge t as % of Crops GDP 2007-08 6.52 3.21 7.61 8.90 2.59 10.08 1.12 10.07 2008-09 8.12 3.20 9.82 10.34 2.21 11.05 1.24 11.37 2009-10 6.06 3.19 7.11 7.63 2.61 8.42 0.96 8.89 2010-11 6.49 2.80 7.96 8.79 1.90 8.86 1.06 9.90 2011-12 5.74 2.41 6.93 8.30 1.28 8.06 1.01 10.01 2007-08 6.52 3.21 7.61 8.90 2.59 10.08 1.12 10.07 2008-09 8.12 3.20 9.82 10.34 2.21 11.05 1.24 11.37 2009-10 6.06 3.19 7.11 7.63 2.61 8.42 0.96 8.89 2010-11 6.49 2.80 7.96 8.79 1.90 8.86 1.06 9.90 2011-12 5.74 2.41 6.93 8.30 1.28 8.06 1.01 10.01 Fiscal Year MOA Budget as % of total Budget MOA Developme nt Budget as % of total Developme nt Budget MOA Non Developme nt Budget as % of total Non Developme nt Budget MOA Recurrent Budget as % of total Recurrent Budget MOA Capital Budget as % of total capital Budget MOA Budget as % of total Revenue MOA Budge t as % of GDP MOA Budge t as % of Crops GDP Source: iBAS, Finance Division. Table 5.2: Ministry of Agriculture budget and actual expenditure during 2007-2011 Non Development Development Total Actual as % of Budget Year Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual Non-Dev Dev. Total 2007-08 5359 5343 748 735 6107 6078 99.70 98.26 99.53 2008-09 6875 6259 775 724 7650 6983 91.04 93.42 91.28 2009-10 5760 6452 944 905 6704 7357 112.01 95.87 109.74 2010-11 7397 7417 1042 1025 8439 8442 100.27 98.37 100.04 2011-12 8243 8767 1022 998 9265 9764 106.36 97.65 105.40 2007-08 5359 5343 748 735 6107 6078 99.70 98.26 99.53 2008-09 6875 6259 775 724 7650 6983 91.04 93.42 91.28 2009-10 5760 6452 944 905 6704 7357 112.01 95.87 109.74 2010-11 7397 7417 1042 1025 8439 8442 100.27 98.37 100.04 2011-12 8243 8767 1022 998 9265 9764 106.36 97.65 105.40 Non Development Development Total Actual as % of BudgetYear Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual Non-Dev Dev. Total Source: iBAS, Finance Division. Table 5.1: Share of Agriculture Ministry budget during 2007-2011 (taka crore) Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 76 Table 5.3: Total Non-Development and Development Costs over the Medium Term Year wise costing (Taka Crore) Items 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Non-Development 847615 93998 10025 10757 11517 Development 1301.9 2046 2606 3221 3865.2 Total expenditure 9777.9 11445 12631 13978 15382.2 Memorandum Items: GDP at current prices 1041356 1187534 1356694 1548227 1764504 Crops GDP at current prices 102684 113979 126517 140434 155882 Total Exp as % of GDP 0.94 0.96 0.93 0.90 0.87 Total Exp as % of Crops GDP 9.52 10.041 9.98 9.95 9.87 Non-Development 847615 93998 10025 10757 11517 Development 1301.9 2046 2606 3221 3865.2 Total expenditure 9777.9 11445 12631 13978 15382.2 Memorandum Items: GDP at current prices 1041356 1187534 1356694 1548227 1764504 Crops GDP at current prices 102684 113979 126517 140434 155882 Total Exp as % of GDP 0.94 0.96 0.93 0.90 0.87 Total Exp as % of Crops GDP 9.52 10.041 9.98 9.95 9.87 Year wise costing (Taka Crore)Items 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Table 5.4: Department/Agency wise Medium Term costing of Development Projects Year wise Project cost (Tk in Crore) Executing Agency Project Status Total Project cost (Tk in Crore) Expenditure upto June 2012(Tk in Crore) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Ongoing Projects 173.6 26.9 56.2 55.6 25.0 10.0 0.0 Expected Projects16 10.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Ministry of Agriculture Subtotal 183.6 26.9 57.2 57.6 27.0 12.0 3.0 Ongoing Projects 1711.0 557.1 323.3 326.5 201.8 186.3 116.1 Expected Projects 2242.9 0.0 16.0 114.5 400.0 649.4 1063.0 DAE Subtotal 3953.9 557.1 339.3 441.1 601.8 835.6 1179.1 Ongoing Projects 2580.1 873.7 391.2 552.4 481.3 233.4 47.9 Expected Projects 2529.3 0.0 16.0 173.4 467.6 704.0 1168.3 BADC Subtotal 5109.4 873.7 407.2 725.8 949.0 937.4 1216.2 Ongoing Projects 427.8 91.7 93.6 92.1 86.2 64.3 0.0 Expected Projects 505.2 0.0 4.0 35.7 62.4 135.3 267.8 BARI Subtotal 933.0 91.7 97.6 127.8 148.6 199.5 267.8 Ongoing Projects 166.9 41.0 43.3 32.5 28.8 18.9 2.4 Expected Projects 251.4 0.0 2.0 17.4 51.0 80.0 101.0 BRRI Subtotal 418.3 41.0 45.3 49.9 79.8 98.9 103.4 Ongoing Projects 279.4 113.9 77.6 87.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Expected Projects 48.8 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.1 12.8 25.8 BARC Ongoing Projo ects 173.6 26.9 56.2 55.6 25.0 10.0 0.0 Expected Projo ects16 10.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Ministry of Agriculture Subtotal 183.6 26.9 57.2 57.6 27.0 12.0 3.0 Ongoing Projo ects 1711.0 557.1 323.3 326.5 201.8 186.3 116.1 Expected Projo ects 2242.9 0.0 16.0 114.5 400.0 649.4 1063.0DAE Subtotal 3953.9 557.1 339.3 441.1 601.8 835.6 1179.1 Ongoing Projo ects 2580.1 873.7 391.2 552.4 481.3 233.4 47.9 Expected Projo ects 2529.3 0.0 16.0 173.4 467.6 704.0 1168.3BADC Subtotal 5109.4 873.7 407.2 725.8 949.0 937.4 1216.2 Ongoing Projo ects 427.8 91.7 93.6 92.1 86.2 64.3 0.0 Expected Projo ects 505.2 0.0 4.0 35.7 62.4 135.3 267.8BARI Subtotal 933.0 91.7 97.6 127.8 148.6 199.5 267.8 Ongoing Projo ects 166.9 41.0 43.3 32.5 28.8 18.9 2.4 Expected Projo ects 251.4 0.0 2.0 17.4 51.0 80.0 101.0BRRI Subtotal 418.3 41.0 45.3 49.9 79.8 98.9 103.4 Ongoing Projo ects 279.4 113.9 77.6 87.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Expected Projo ects 48.8 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.1 12.8 25.8BARC Year wise Projo ect cost (Tk in Crore) Executing Agency Projo ect Status Total Projo ect cost (Tk in Crore) Expenditure upto June 2012(Tk in Crore) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 15 Non-development projections are made on the basis of FY2011-12 revised Budget allocation (Taka 8243 crore) and FY2012-13 original Budget (Taka 7675 crore). Subsequently, in the revised budget for FY2012-13, the amount of allocation increased to Taka 13732 crore. This significant increase in budget provision is due mainly to quantum jump in agriculture subsidy. Non-Development expenditure except subsidy remains almost stable over the year. As agriculture subsidy constitute a major portion (Taka 12000 crore in FY12-13) of non-development expenditure, the future years cost estimates have been made in this document may differ in the subsequent years due to variation of input prices (mainly fertilizer) in the international market. Given that the MTSBP is a living document and likely to undergo revision in the third year, any change/ or actual allocation will be reflected in the revised document. 16 Expected project cost comprises both listed expected project cost (Annex 6.2.1 to A6.2.11) and priority area wise expected project cost (Annex 6.3.1 to Annex 6.3.6) (contd.) Programs/Projects and Financing Needs 77 Subtotal 328.2 113.9 79.6 89.9 6.1 12.8 25.8 Ongoing Projects 32.4 4.2 15.5 7.0 5.4 0.3 0.0 Expected Projects 452.8 0.0 2.0 21.7 60.5 132.1 236.5 DAM Subtotal 485.2 4.2 17.5 28.7 66.0 132.3 236.5 Ongoing Projects 6.0 1.5 0.8 1.8 1.0 0.9 0.0 Expected Projects 212.8 0.0 0.0 13.0 40.0 90.0 69.8 SCA Subtotal 218.8 1.5 0.8 14.8 41.0 90.9 69.8 Ongoing Projects 138.3 53.6 15.7 16.4 31.6 20.7 0.4 Expected Projects 91.5 0.0 1.0 7.5 12.6 25.0 45.3 SRDI Subtotal 229.8 53.6 16.7 24.0 44.2 45.7 45.7 Ongoing Projects 45.6 16.9 7.5 12.4 8.8 0.0 0.0 Expected Projects 91.2 0.0 1.0 8.3 16.8 25.0 40.2AIS Subtotal 136.8 16.9 8.5 20.6 25.7 25.0 40.2 Ongoing Projects 29.1 8.7 8.4 10.1 1.9 0.0 0.0 Expected Projects 186.4 0.0 2.0 15.0 30.1 56.4 82.9 Subtotal 215.5 8.7 10.4 25.1 32.0 56.4 82.9 Ongoing Projects 1471.6 472.5 156.0 256.3 245.0 307.3 34.5 Expected Projects 695.8 0.0 6.0 60.0 130.2 200.0 299.7 Subtotal 2167.4 472.5 162.0 316.3 375.2 507.3 334.2 Ongoing Projects 118.2 32.0 20.0 15.0 18.0 20.0 13.2 Expected Projects 212.8 0.0 1.0 16.0 50.5 62.8 82.6 Subtotal 331.0 32.0 21.0 31.0 68.5 82.8 95.8 Ongoing Projects 14.1 1.8 4.9 6.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 Expected Projects 120.0 0.0 2.0 15.0 30.0 50.0 23.0 Subtotal 134.1 1.8 6.9 21.0 31.4 50.0 23.0 Ongoing Projects 112.9 40.0 25.0 35.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 Expected Projects 241.8 0.0 2.0 12.5 56.9 74.4 95.9 Subtotal 354.7 40.0 27.0 47.5 69.8 74.4 95.9 Ongoing Projects 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Expected Projects 176.00 0.00 5.00 25.00 40.00 60.00 46.00 Subtotal 176.00 0.00 5.00 25.00 40.00 60.00 46.00 A. Total Ongoing Projects 7307.0 2335.5 1238.9 1506.9 1149.3 861.9 214.5 B. Total Expected Projects (Listed+Priority Area)* 8068.6 - 63.0 539.1 1456.7 2359.1 3650.7 Grand Total (A+B) 15375.7 2335.5 1301.9 2046.0 2606.0 3221.0 3865.2 Memorandum Item MOA Development Resource Allocation in SFYP 1563 2046 2606 3221 Subtotal 328.2 113.9 79.6 89.9 6.1 12.8 25.8 Ongoing Projo ects 32.4 4.2 15.5 7.0 5.4 0.3 0.0 Expected Projo ects 452.8 0.0 2.0 21.7 60.5 132.1 236.5DAM Subtotal 485.2 4.2 17.5 28.7 66.0 132.3 236.5 Ongoing Projo ects 6.0 1.5 0.8 1.8 1.0 0.9 0.0 Expected Projo ects 212.8 0.0 0.0 13.0 40.0 90.0 69.8SCA Subtotal 218.8 1.5 0.8 14.8 41.0 90.9 69.8 Ongoing Projo ects 138.3 53.6 15.7 16.4 31.6 20.7 0.4 Expected Projo ects 91.5 0.0 1.0 7.5 12.6 25.0 45.3SRDI Subtotal 229.8 53.6 16.7 24.0 44.2 45.7 45.7 Ongoing Projo ects 45.6 16.9 7.5 12.4 8.8 0.0 0.0 Expected Projo ects 91.2 0.0 1.0 8.3 16.8 25.0 40.2AIS Subtotal 136.8 16.9 8.5 20.6 25.7 25.0 40.2 Ongoing Projo ects 29.1 8.7 8.4 10.1 1.9 0.0 0.0 Expected Projo ects 186.4 0.0 2.0 15.0 30.1 56.4 82.9 Subtotal 215.5 8.7 10.4 25.1 32.0 56.4 82.9 Ongoing Projo ects 1471.6 472.5 156.0 256.3 245.0 307.3 34.5 Expected Projo ects 695.8 0.0 6.0 60.0 130.2 200.0 299.7 Subtotal 2167.4 472.5 162.0 316.3 375.2 507.3 334.2 Ongoing Projo ects 118.2 32.0 20.0 15.0 18.0 20.0 13.2 Expected Projo ects 212.8 0.0 1.0 16.0 50.5 62.8 82.6 Subtotal 331.0 32.0 21.0 31.0 68.5 82.8 95.8 Ongoing Projo ects 14.1 1.8 4.9 6.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 Expected Projo ects 120.0 0.0 2.0 15.0 30.0 50.0 23.0 Subtotal 134.1 1.8 6.9 21.0 31.4 50.0 23.0 Ongoing Projo ects 112.9 40.0 25.0 35.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 Expected Projo ects 241.8 0.0 2.0 12.5 56.9 74.4 95.9 Subtotal 354.7 40.0 27.0 47.5 69.8 74.4 95.9 Ongoing Projo ects 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Expected Projo ects 176.00 0.00 5.00 25.00 40.00 60.00 46.00 Subtotal 176.00 0.00 5.00 25.00 40.00 60.00 46.00 A. Total Ongoing Projo ects 7307.0 2335.5 1238.9 1506.9 1149.3 861.9 214.5 B. Total Expected Projo ects (Listed+Priority Area)* 8068.6 - 63.0 539.1 1456.7 2359.1 3650.7 Grand Total (A+B) 15375.7 2335.5 1301.9 2046.0 2606.0 3221.0 3865.2 Memorandum Item MOA Development Resource Allocation in SFYP 1563 2046 2606 3221 BSRI BMDA BJRI CDB BINA BIRTAN Year wise Project cost (Tk in Crore) Executing Agency Project Status Total Project cost (Tk in Crore) Expenditure upto June 2012(Tk in Crore) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Year wise Projo ect cost (Tk in Crore) Executing Agency Projo ect Status Total Projo ect cost (Tk in Crore) Expenditure upto June 2012(Tk in Crore) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 * Listed expected projects and Priority area base expected projects are selected on the basis of Sixth Five Year plan and Ministry policy documents Align Lines Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 78 Table 5.5: Department/Agency wise Medium Term Non-Development Costs (Tk. Crore) Year wise costing Executive agency/ Operation unit/programs 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Operation Unit: Secretariat 6839 7258 7838 8465 9143 Approved/ expected program 0 400 400 400 400 Total 6839 7658 8238 8865 9543 DAE: Operation unit 28 28 0 28 28 Field services division 77 79 82 84 86 Plant Protection department 10 10 11 11 11 Cash crop division-tobacco and jute 2 2 2 2 2 Food crops divisions 25 26 26 27 28 Agricultural education and training 20 21 22 22 23 Upazilla agriculture office 534 548 567 586 606 Approved/ expected program 20 0 0 0 0 Total 715 714 709 760 784 BADC: Operation unit 262 279 301 325 351 Approved/ expected program 143 0 0 0 0 Total 405 279 301 325 351 BARi: Operation unit 143 152 164 177 191 Approved/ expected program 1 0 0 0 0 Total 144 152 164 177 191 BRRI: Operation unit 38 40 44 47 51 Approved/ expecd program 3 0 0 0 0 Total 41 40 44 47 51 BJRI: Operation unit 20 22 23 25 27 Approved/ expected program 1 0 0 0 0 Total 21 22 23 25 27 BINA: Operation unit 14 15 16 17 19 Approved/ expected program 1 0 0 0 0 Total 15 15 16 17 19 BSRI: Operation unit 15 16 17 18 20 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 15 16 17 18 20 BMDA: Operation unit 0 0 0 0 0 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 BARC: Operation unit 13 14 15 16 18 Operation Unit: Secretariat 6839 7258 7838 8465 9143 Approved/ expected program 0 400 400 400 400 Total 6839 7658 8238 8865 9543 DAE: Operation unit 28 28 0 28 28 Field servrr ices division 77 79 82 84 86 Plant Protection departrr ment 10 10 11 11 11 Cash crop division-tobacco and jute 2 2 2 2 2 Food crops divisions 25 26 26 27 28 Agricultural education and training 20 21 22 22 23 Upazilla agriculture offff ice 534 548 567 586 606 Approved/ expected program 20 0 0 0 0 Total 715 714 709 760 784 BADC: Operation unit 262 279 301 325 351 Approved/ expected program 143 0 0 0 0 Total 405 279 301 325 351 BARi: Operation unit 143 152 164 177 191 Approved/ expected program 1 0 0 0 0 Total 144 152 164 177 191 BRRI: Operation unit 38 40 44 47 51 Approved/ expecd program 3 0 0 0 0 Total 41 40 44 47 51 BJRI: Operation unit 20 22 23 25 27 Approved/ expected program 1 0 0 0 0 Total 21 22 23 25 27 BINA: Operation unit 14 15 16 17 19 Approved/ expected program 1 0 0 0 0 Total 15 15 16 17 19 BSRI: Operation unit 15 16 17 18 20 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 15 16 17 18 20 BMDA: Operation unit 0 0 0 0 0 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 BARC: Operation unit 13 14 15 16 18 Year wise costingExecutive agency/yy Operation unit/programs 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Contd. Programs/Projects and Financing Needs 79 Year wise costing Executive agency/ Operation unit/programs 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Year wise costingExecutive agency/yy Operation unit/programs 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 CDB: Operation unit 24 26 28 30 33 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 25 26 28 30 33 SCA: Operation unit 7 7 8 9 9 Approved/ expected program 1 0 0 0 0 Total 8 7 8 9 9 AIS: Operation unit 7 8 9 9 10 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 7 8 9 9 10 DAM: Operation unit 12 13 14 15 16 Approved/ expected program 2 0 0 0 0 Total 14 13 14 15 16 SRDI: Operation Unit 21 22 24 26 28 Approved/ expected program 5 0 0 0 0 Total 25 22 24 26 28 BIRTAN: Operation Unit 14 15 16 17 18 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 14 15 16 17 18 Total operation unit (A) 8301 8999 9625 10357 11117 Total Programs (B) 175 400 400 400 400 Grand Total (A+B) 8476 9399 10025 10757 11517 BARC: Operation unit 13 14 15 16 18 Approved/ expecd program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 13 14 15 16 18 CDB: Operation unit 24 26 28 30 33 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 25 26 28 30 33 SCA: Operation unit 7 7 8 9 9 Approved/ expected program 1 0 0 0 0 Total 8 7 8 9 9 AIS: Operation unit 7 8 9 9 10 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 7 8 9 9 10 DAM: Operation unit 12 13 14 15 16 Approved/ expected program 2 0 0 0 0 Total 14 13 14 15 16 SRDI: Operation Unit 21 22 24 26 28 Approved/ expected program 5 0 0 0 0 Total 25 22 24 26 28 BIRTAN: Operation Unit 14 15 16 17 18 Approved/ expected program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 14 15 16 17 18 Total operation unit (A)AA 8301 8999 9625 10357 11117 Total Programs (B) 175 400 400 400 400 Grand Total (A+AA B) 8476 9399 10025 10757 11517 BARC: Operation unit 13 14 15 16 18 Approved/ expecd program 0 0 0 0 0 Total 13 14 15 16 18 81 Annual Performance Plan 6.1 Agency/Department wise Dominant Performance Parameters for Programs/Projects/Activities with Baseline and Yearly Targets for Five Years The dominant performance parameters for programs/projects/activities of the Ministry of Agricultureare presented in the Tables Annex A7.1 to A7.16. This draws heavily from the Ministry Budget Framework of the Ministry. However, there is a major change as compared with the MBF. As the MBF basically deals with outputs and outcomes as a result of the implementation of projects/programs, and the Secretariat does not implement any project, it is generally reported in the MBF that the Secretariat does not have any outcomes/outputs. However, budgetary practices in the OECD countries indicate that the policy and other documents published by the Secretariat can be regarded as their outputs. Activities and Outputs of the Secretariat The following published documents17 are regarded as outputs of the Secretariat and are indicated in Annex Table A7.1 with exact time schedules for their preparation and publication within the planning horizon: 1. Any published documents on Action/Operational/Business Plan, Budget, Statistics Yearbook, Annual Report, Policy documents, Reports of Working Groups, Expert Committees etc. 2. Any planned amendments of existing Acts, Laws and Regulations etc. 3. Any planned new Acts, Laws etc. 4. Any projects/programs relating to capacity building, training, data management, MIS, conducting surveys etc. 6.2 Broad Procurement Plan for Five Years Central Procurement Technical Unit (CPTU) in the IMED has made significant progres in introduction of procurement manual, guidelines, rules and regulations. Procurement plan presentation formats are appended with DPP/RDPP/TPP/RTPP. There are also various Rules and regulations for procurement planning. These procedures and guidelines are followed strictly by the MOA while preparing project proposals for approval by the Planning Commission and ECNEC. However, DPP annual phasing of project cost may not have direct links with actual development budget allocation due to time and cost over C h a p t e r 6 17 In Output Budgeting in OECD countries, these documents are regarded as outputs because these are available for public for discussion, debate, analysis, research leading to value addition and general social welfare. Some of these documents are also presented to the Parliament. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan runs as a result of project appraisal or delays in disbursement of donors’ funds. In most cases, actual budget provision is less than the amount shown in the DPP. Consequently, project/programme implementation falls behind target. Lack of required resources, change of priority etc. may be some of the other reasons for insufficient provision. DPP phasing of actual implementation of project may also be another factor affecting implementation because in most of the cases the DPP phasing of project costs, although done on the basis of rigorous feasibility analysis, becomes outdated by the time the actual implemen tation of the project is initiated by the agencies/departments. The procurement plans for irrigation machinery and equipment, fertilizer and seeds are presented in Tables 6.1 to 6.3. 82 Table 6.1: Year-wise projection and costing of irrigation machineries and other equipments (in Taka Lakh) Year-wise requirement and costing 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 Serial no. Description of irrigation machineries Number required costing Number required costing Number required costing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Engine, electric motor, pump (5 -Q, 2 -Q and 1 -Q power) 893 4050 910 4131 928 4214 2 Establi shment of Force Mode Tubewell 175 4900 200 5600 150 4200 3 Operations of irrigation machineries through solar power 7 140 15 300 30 600 4 Establishment of floating Pump 0 2200 0 1894 30 2100 5 Collection of Submarsible Pump and other equipments 315 280 350 269 450 346 6 Establishment of structure for irrigation water distribution system (in k.m) 900 7500 1500 11670 1500 11670 7 Establishment of Rabber Dam 2 2000 2 2000 3 6500 8 Total yearly cost 21070 25864 29630 9 Relevant equipments(10%) 211 25 9 296 Grand Total 21281 26123 29926 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Engine, electric motor, pump (5 -Q, 2 -Q and 1 -Q power) 893 4050 910 4131 928 4214 2 Establi shment of Force Mode Tubewell 175 4900 200 5600 150 4200 3 Operations of irrigation machineries through solar power 7 140 15 300 30 600 4 Establishment of floating Pump 0 2200 0 1894 30 2100 5 Collection of Submarsible Pump and other equipments 315 280 350 269 450 346 6 Establishment of structure for irrigation water distribution system (in k.m) 900 7500 1500 11670 1500 11670 7 Establishment of Rabber Dam 2 2000 2 2000 3 6500 8 Total yearly cost 21070 25864 29630 9 Relevant equipments(10%) 211 25 9 296 Grand Total 21281 26123 29926 Year-wise requirement and costing 2012 -13 2013 -14 2014 -15 Serial no. Description of irrigation machineries Number required costing Number required costing Number required costing Contd. Annual Performance Plan 83 Table 6.2: Demand and use of different Fertilizer from 2010-11 to 2011-12 and Projections for the years 2012-13 to 2014-15 (in lakh metric tons) 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14* 2014 -15* Name of the fertilizer Demand Use Demand Use Demand Use Demand Use Demand Use UREA 28.31 26.57 30.00 22.96 25.00 - 24.50 - 24.00 TSP 7.14 5.96 7.90 6.78 7.00 - 6.50 - 6.00 MOP 5.50 4.97 7.80 6.13 8.70 - 9.00 - 9.25 DAP 4.45 3.53 7.08 4.09 6.00 - 6.50 - 7.00 UREA 28.31 26.57 30.00 22.96 25.00 - 24.50 - 24.00 TSP 7.14 5.96 7.90 6.78 7.00 - 6.50 - 6.00 MOP 5.50 4.97 7.80 6.13 8.70 - 9.00 - 9.25 DAP 4.45 3.53 7.08 4.09 6.00 - 6.50 - 7.00 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14* 2014 -15*Name of the fertilizer Demand Use Demand Use Demand Use Demand Use Demand Use Requirement for irrigation machineries Year -wise requirement and costing Total 2015 -16 2016 -17 Serial no. Description of irrigation machineries Number required costing Number required costing Number required costing 1 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 Engine, electric motor, pump (5 -Q, 2-Q and 1-Q power) 881 4002 807 3666 4410 20063 2 Establishment of forcemodeTubewell 150 4200 200 5600 875 24500 3 Operationalize of irrigation machineries through solar power 50 1000 100 2000 202 4040 4 Establishment of floating Pump 50 3500 70 4900 150 14594 5 Collection of submursic Pump and other equipments 450 346 235 181 1800 1423 6 Establishment of structure for irrigation water distribution system (in k.m) 2000 15560 2500 19450 8400 65850 7 Establishment of Rabar Dam 4 6000 4 6000 15 22500 8 Total yearly cost 34609 41797 152970 9 Relevant equipments(10%) 346 418 1530 Grand Total 34955 42215 154500 1 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 Engine, electric motor, pump (5 -Q, 2-Q and 1-Q power) 881 4002 807 3666 4410 20063 2 Establishment of forcemodeTubewell 150 4200 200 5600 875 24500 3 Operationalize of irrigation machineries through solar power 50 1000 100 2000 202 4040 4 Establishment of floating Pump 50 3500 70 4900 150 14594 5 Collection of submursic Pump and other equipments 450 346 235 181 1800 1423 6 Establishment of structure for irrigation water distribution system (in k.m) 2000 15560 2500 19450 8400 65850 7 Establishment of Rabar Dam 4 6000 4 6000 15 22500 8 Total yearly cost 34609 41797 152970 9 Relevant equipments(10%) 346 418 1530 Grand Total 34955 42215 154500 Year -wise requirement and costing Total 2015 -16 2016 -17 Serial no. Description of irrigation machineries Number required costing Number required costing Number required costing Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 84 T a b le 6 .3 P la n f o r se e d p ro d u ct io n / p ro cu re m e n t a n d c o st in g f ro m 2 0 1 2 1 3 t o 2 0 1 6 1 7 P ro je ct io n fo r se e d p ro d u ct io n/ p ro cu re m e nt P ro d u ct io n/ p ro cu re m e nt in 2 0 1 2 1 3 7 1 6 1 0 2 6 1 5 1 0 2 5 1 4 1 0 2 4 1 3 1 0 2 S e ri a l n o . N a m e o f th e s e e d cr o p A m o u nt o f la n d (l a kh h e ct o re ) A g ro n om ic re q u ir em e n t (m et ri c to n ) A m o u nt re q u ir e d (M e tr ic to n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta l p ric e (l a kh t a ka ) A m o u nt re q u ir e d (M e tr ic t o n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta l p ri ce (l a kh ta ka ) A m o u nt re q u ir e d (M e tr ic to n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta l p ric e (l a kh t a ka ) A m o u n t re q u ir e d (M e tr ic t o n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta l p ric e (l a kh t a ka ) A m o u nt re q u ir e d (M e tr ic t o n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta l p ri ce ( la kh ta ka ) 1 A u sh (U fs h i) 6 .0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 9 5 2 5 2 7 4 1 3 5 0 2 7 3 6 5 1 3 5 0 2 8 3 7 8 1 4 8 5 3 0 4 4 6 1 8 0 0 3 2 5 7 6 2 A m a n (U fs h i) 3 6 .1 5 9 0 3 7 5 2 2 1 5 0 2 5 5 5 3 8 4 0 6 6 0 2 7 1 0 9 7 8 4 5 1 8 7 2 8 1 2 6 5 2 4 5 1 8 7 3 0 1 3 5 5 6 4 5 5 0 0 3 2 1 4 5 6 0 3 B o ro ( U fs h i) 3 7 .5 0 9 3 7 5 0 5 8 4 9 5 2 7 1 5 7 9 4 6 6 0 0 0 2 9 1 9 1 4 0 6 8 0 0 0 2 9 1 9 7 2 0 6 8 0 0 0 3 2 2 1 7 6 0 6 8 5 0 0 3 4 2 3 2 9 0 B o ro ( H yb ri d ) 1 0 .0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 5 0 5 1 6 5 2 4 8 3 5 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 7 5 8 7 5 0 5 0 0 0 1 8 0 9 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 8 5 9 2 5 0 T o ta l p ad d y se e d 8 9 .6 5 2 1 4 1 2 5 8 3 2 4 5 2 4 0 8 8 1 1 3 0 1 0 3 8 9 8 3 1 1 9 5 3 7 4 1 5 0 0 1 1 9 6 7 2 4 4 7 6 2 1 2 0 8 0 0 4 7 6 7 6 4 W h e at s e e d 4 .2 5 6 3 7 5 0 1 8 0 0 0 2 8 5 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 9 9 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 4 1 0 5 4 0 3 1 5 0 0 3 6 1 1 3 4 0 5 M a iz e s e e d 1 .8 0 6 2 5 0 3 4 0 6 5 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 7 0 1 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 7 5 1 6 5 0 2 2 0 0 8 0 1 7 6 0 2 2 0 0 8 5 1 8 7 0 T o ta l c e re a l s e e d 9 5 .7 0 2 8 4 1 2 5 1 0 1 5 8 5 2 9 3 4 9 1 4 5 0 1 0 4 9 3 8 3 1 5 2 7 3 7 5 3 0 7 0 1 5 2 8 7 2 5 7 0 6 2 1 5 4 5 0 0 6 0 8 8 6 6 P o ta to se e d 4 .2 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 8 1 8 4 1 6 1 2 8 0 0 0 2 0 5 6 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 2 2 7 9 2 0 3 6 0 0 0 2 5 9 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 2 6 0 7 L e n til s e e d 6 .5 8 2 3 1 8 4 1 8 0 0 7 5 1 3 5 0 2 5 1 0 8 0 2 0 0 8 2 5 1 0 8 5 2 1 3 4 2 7 7 5 9 0 2 4 9 8 3 1 5 0 9 5 2 9 9 2 .5 8 O il se e d 7 .3 6 1 7 5 7 8 1 7 0 0 7 0 1 1 9 0 2 2 6 5 7 5 1 6 9 9 2 2 6 5 8 0 1 8 1 2 2 5 0 0 8 5 2 1 2 5 2 9 0 0 9 0 2 6 1 0 9 P a d d y se e d 4 .5 0 4 0 0 0 1 3 1 8 7 5 9 8 9 1 8 5 0 8 0 1 4 8 0 2 0 0 0 8 0 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 5 1 7 0 0 2 1 0 0 9 0 1 8 9 0 1 0 V e g e ta b le s e e d 7 .5 0 2 8 2 2 1 1 9 3 0 0 3 5 7 1 4 2 3 2 0 4 5 4 1 5 2 3 3 0 5 0 2 1 5 2 3 4 0 5 1 7 1 6 0 3 5 0 5 6 0 1 1 S p ic e s se e d 4 .7 8 1 5 5 4 6 3 7 0 6 5 0 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 2 0 7 9 2 0 1 1 0 0 7 4 0 8 1 4 0 G ra n d t o ta l 13 0. 67 10 87 17 2 12 97 10 37 85 1 18 07 77 67 42 4 19 67 64 74 73 7 19 73 99 80 82 1 20 19 10 87 33 9 G ra n d to ta l 13 0. 67 10 87 17 2 12 97 10 37 85 1 18 07 77 67 42 4 19 67 64 74 73 1 1 S p ic e s se e d 4 .7 8 1 5 5 4 6 3 7 0 6 5 0 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 6 8 0 6 8 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 7 L e n til se e d 6 .5 8 2 3 1 8 4 1 8 0 1 A u sh (U fsff h i) 6 .0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 9 5 2 5 2 7 4 1 3 5 0 2 7 3 6 5 1 3 5 0 2 8 3 7 8 1 4 8 5 3 0 4 4 6 1 8 0 0 3 2 5 7 6 2 A m a n (U fsff h i) 3 6 .1 5 9 0 3 7 5 2 2 1 5 0 2 5 5 5 3 8 4 0 6 6 0 2 7 1 0 9 7 8 4 5 1 8 7 2 8 1 2 6 5 2 4 5 1 8 7 3 0 1 3 5 5 6 4 5 5 0 0 3 2 1 4 5 6 0 3 B o ro (U fsff h i) 3 7 .5 0 9 3 7 5 0 5 8 4 9 5 2 7 1 5 7 9 4 6 6 0 0 0 2 9 1 9 1 4 0 6 8 0 0 0 2 9 1 9 7 2 0 6 8 0 0 0 3 2 2 1 7 6 0 6 8 5 0 0 3 4 2 3 2 9 0 B o ro ( H yb ri d ) 1 0 .0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 5 0 5 1 6 5 2 4 8 3 5 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 7 5 8 7 5 0 5 0 0 0 1 8 0 9 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 8 5 9 2 5 0 T o ta lp ad d y se e d 8 9 .6 5 2 1 4 1 2 5 8 3 2 4 5 2 4 0 8 8 1 1 3 0 1 0 3 8 9 8 3 1 1 9 5 3 7 4 1 5 0 0 1 1 9 6 7 2 4 4 7 6 2 1 2 0 8 0 0 4 7 6 7 6 4 W h e at s e e d 4 .2 5 6 3 7 5 0 1 8 0 0 0 2 8 5 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 9 9 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 4 1 0 5 4 0 3 1 5 0 0 3 6 1 1 3 4 0 5 M a iz e se e d 1 .8 0 6 2 5 0 3 4 0 6 5 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 7 0 1 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 7 5 1 6 5 0 2 2 0 0 8 0 1 7 6 0 2 2 0 0 8 5 1 8 7 0 T o ta lc e re a ls e e d 9 5 .7 0 2 8 4 1 2 5 1 0 1 5 8 5 2 9 3 4 9 1 4 5 0 1 0 4 9 3 8 3 1 5 2 7 3 7 5 3 0 7 0 1 5 2 8 7 2 5 7 0 6 2 1 5 4 5 0 0 6 0 8 8 6 6 P o ta to se e d 4 .2 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 8 1 8 4 1 6 1 2 8 0 0 0 2 0 5 6 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 2 2 7 9 2 0 3 6 0 0 0 2 5 9 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 2 7 1 0 2 6 0 0 7 5 1 3 5 0 2 5 1 0 8 0 2 0 0 8 2 5 1 0 8 5 2 1 3 4 2 7 7 5 9 0 2 4 9 8 3 1 5 0 9 5 2 9 9 2 .5 8 O il se e d 7 .3 6 1 7 5 7 8 1 7 0 0 7 0 1 1 9 0 2 2 6 5 7 5 1 6 9 9 2 2 6 5 8 0 1 8 1 2 2 5 0 0 8 5 2 1 2 5 2 9 0 0 9 0 2 6 1 0 9 P a d d y se e d 4 .5 0 4 0 0 0 1 3 1 8 7 5 9 8 9 1 8 5 0 8 0 1 4 8 0 2 0 0 0 8 0 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 5 1 7 0 0 2 1 0 0 9 0 1 8 9 0 1 0 V e g e ta b le se e d 7 .5 0 2 8 2 2 1 1 9 3 0 0 3 5 7 1 4 2 3 2 0 4 5 4 1 5 2 3 3 0 5 0 2 1 5 2 3 4 0 5 1 7 1 6 0 3 5 0 5 6 0 7 7 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 2 0 7 9 2 0 1 1 0 0 7 4 0 8 1 4 0 7 19 73 99 80 82 1 20 19 10 87 33 9 P ro je ct io n fo r se e d p ro d u ct io n/ p ro cu re m e nt P ro d u ct io n/ p ro cu re m e nt in 2 0 1 2 1 3 7 1 6 1 0 2 6 1 5 1 0 2 5 1 4 1 0 2 4 1 3 1 0 2 S e ri a l n o . N a m e o f t f he se e d cr o p A m o u nt o f la n d (l a kh h e ct o re ) A g ro n om ic re q u ir em e n t (m et ri c to n ) A m o u nt re q u ir e d (M e tr ic to n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta lp ric e (l a kh ta ka ) A m o u nt re q u ir e d (M e tr ic to n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta l p ri ce (l a kh ta ka ) A m o u nt re q u ir e d (M e tr ic to n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta lp ric e (l a kh ta ka ) A m o u n t re q u ir e d (M e tr ic to n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta lp ric e (l a kh ta ka ) A m o u nt re q u ir e d (M e tr ic to n ) P ri ce p e r K .G (T a ka ) T o ta l p ri ce ( la kh ta ka ) Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism and Methodology 7.1 Monitoring and Evaluation System and Mechanism Monitoring, Evaluation, Reviewing and Reporting form an integral part of an effective Medium Term Strategic Business Planning and performance based budgeting. Plan becomes successful and the value for money is realized only when the proposed targets for outcomes/ outputs are achieved in time and within expenditure limits. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) involves collection of relevant data and preparing evaluation reports on regular basis. The reports are presented to the policy makers and budget officers at all levels for review, and to take appropriate policy measures which can be used to update MTSBP and to prepare next year’s budget. Existing Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism Ongoing development projects and programs for the Ministry are monitored and evaluated by the Ministry on regular basis. Monitoring has two parts: internal monitoring and external monitoring. Internal monitoring is the responsibility of the administrative ministry/division which holds monthly Annual Development Plan (ADP) Review Meeting to monitor the financial and physical progress of development projects included in the C h a p t e r 7 85 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan ADP prepared by the Planning Commission and under implementation by the Ministry. All concerned officials of the ministry and representatives of the Finance Division (FD), Economic Relations Division (ERD), Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED) and Planning Commission (PC) are represented in the ADP Review Committee (ADPRC). Agriculture Minister chairs such review meetings. Apart from financial and physical progress, different issues facing the project implementation and time and cost overruns are discussed in the review meeting. The Planning Wing performs as the secretariat of the ADPRC and prepares the working paper. In most cases, the administration division, budget and planning wings, and the concerned agencies are well represented in the ADP review meetings. As part of the internal M & E, a committee headed by additional secretary (Administration and Input Management) has been formed by the Ministry. The members of this committee are officials of the Ministry. They visit ongoing Projects/Programs regularly and submit report to the monitoring and reporting section of the Ministry. The reports mainly deal with the progress of the implementation of projects/programs, constraints in implemen tation and recommend measures to resolve these constraints. Every month the above mentioned Committee holds a meeting and discusses important issues, constraints and measures to tackle time and cost over-runs. External monitoring and evaluation of the development projects/programmes included in the ADP is the responsibility of the Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED) of the Ministry of Planning. IMED prepares monthly, quarterly and annual monitoring and evaluation reports on the basis of data and information sent by concerned Division/Agency in standard formats during the implementation of the projects, and submits these reports to the Executive Committee of the National Economic Council (ECNEC), concerned Line Ministries and other parties. Where ever possible, IMED seeks to explain the constraints in implementation and reasons for time and cost overruns so that corrective measures can be taken in time. As a part of the external monitoring and evaluation of projects and programs, the Economic Adviser’s Wing in the Finance Division also regularly visit ongoing programmes and submit reports to the relevant Ministry/ Division, Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED) of the Ministry of Planning and Finance Division. Proposed M & E Mechanism of the Annual Performance Plans In addition to the normal Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of projects financial and physical implementation for the purpose of IMED Monitoring and Evaluation as described above, it is desirable to monitor and evaluate the trends of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Inputs of the Ministry and Outputs and other performance parameters indicated for projects/programs/activities being implemented by the Agencies and Departments in order to judge the efficiency and effectiveness18 of the projects/ programs/activities and the value for money. In case of Ministry level Key Performance indicators (KPI’s), it is necessary to conduct independent study by third party such as Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Food Division (FPMU unit), IFRI, FAO, IRRI, BIDS and 86 18 There are three types of evaluation depending on evaluating the actual inputs, outputs and outcomes in relation to planned/ budgeted inputs, outputs and outcomes. While comparison of actual inputs with planned inputs (both financial and physical) determines (financial/ physical) compliance, comparison of actual outputs with planned outputs determines the efficiency of a project, and comparison of actual outcomes with planned outcomes determines the effectiveness of a project. Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism and Methodology other relevant organizations. For these activities, it is necessary to strengthen the M&E cells in the Secretariat and Agencies/Departments and to upgrade the needed Information and Communications Technology (ICT) infrastructure in Ministries/Divisions/Agencies/ Departments and their on-line inter-linkages. Particularly, the following support services will be strengthened for the M & E of the MTSBP and MTBF. All these responsibilities should be dealt by the Budget Management Branch or Budget Management Wing of the Ministry. M & E Support Services Strengthening M&E Structures in the Budget Management Branch (BMB): M & E of the KPIs, outputs, inputs contained in the MTSBP is critical for the realization of the targets set in the Medium Term Budgeting. MOA will strengthen the existing M & E Cell in the Budget Management Branch for developing necessary structures and systems to support monitoring and evaluation of the Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan. The M&E Cell will be given full responsibility to coordinate and undertake all M&E activities in the Ministry. Establish a comprehensive database: A comprehensive data-base management system is key to an efficient and effective M&E Framework, as timely availability of reliable data and quality statistics are important for performance-based medium term planning and budgeting and effective policy formulation. The Ministry and its supporting Agencies/Departments in collaboration with the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) would strengthen the institutional set-up and mechanism for designing and conducting appropriate surveys for collection of necessary and reliable data and information in time. The capacity for data collection, data warehousing and retrieval, collation, analysis and dissemination will be enhanced to ensure cross-validation, ownership and legitimacy of all data. In fact, an effective Management Information System (MIS) and online connec tions with other departments/agencies will be established and strengthened for M&E. Preparation and Approval of M&E Reports: Initially an Annual M & E Report on the past trends and performance of all KPIs, output, input and other Performance Indicators will be prepared by the Ministry. M & E Reports will be reviewed and approved by appropriate authority. Preparation of annual M& E Report: Hard copies of the Annual M & E Report would be sent to the Finance Division and the Planning Commission. Annual M & E Reports will be put on Ministry website for information of the general public, researchers and all stakeholders. 7.2 Monitoring and Evaluation Technique19 Evaluation Methodology Performance indicators for outputs/outcomes developed for the Ministry and each Department/Agency will be made available to the concerned authorities in charge of the 87 19 It may be mentioned clearly that the methodology proposed here on the basis of the guidelines for preparation of MTSBP has not been discussed with all the stakeholders. So this methodology is purely for discussion purpose and creating awareness for the evaluation methodology and technique. It is expected that as the preparation of MTSBP and the system of M & E of the MTSBP evolve over time, methodology for M & E will be reviewed and refined. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan implementation of the Strategy and Business Plan and for monitoring and evaluation of results. At the end of the year, achievements of targets will be reviewed and appropriate scores given for individual performance indicators. Table-7.1 presents a very simple methodology20 for determination of scores of the individual Key Performanceindicators. After calculating scores for individual KPI as indicated in Table 7.1, performance of KPIs can be rated by the Ministry as per the rating system21 indicated in Table 7.2. 7.3 Concluding Observation At the end, it may be mentioned that a soft version of the MTSBP will be posted on the Website of the Ministry of Agriculture. The MTSBP and the Annual Performance Plans are living documents and may have to be reviewed/modified/updated at periodic intervals in order to take care of the dynamics of the change in domestic and international economic environment and the policy change of the government. In general, the review and modification may be made after three years and confined to change in underlying policy framework or significant change in internal and external environment. The change in the MTSBP as a result can be effected by issuing an amendment to the existing plan. Besides, as and when necessary this document may be reviewed/modified/updated accordingly. 88 20 It may be mentioned here that the proposed evaluation methodology is not rigid or mandatory and it is being shown purely for illustrative purpose. The methodology could be refined as the works on M & E progress over time. 21 Like the proposed evaluation methodology for determination of scores/marks outlined earlier, the proposed rating system is not rigid or mandatory for any Ministry or Division. These techniques are being indicated purely for illustrative purpose. The rating methodology could be refined as the works on M & E progress over time. Table 7.1 Proposed Marks (Scores) for Input/Output/Outcomes KPIs for M&E ScoreActual Achievement of Output/ Outcome/ KPI 100(a) If the actual achievement of the output/outcome KPI equals 100 per cent or more of the planned output/outcome KPI. 100 multiplied by the Actual Output/ Outcome KPI divided by the Targeted Output/ Outcome KPI (b) If the actual achievement of the output/outcome KPI falls below the planned/budgeted target of the output/ outcome/ KPI. Table 7.2: Rating of KPIs on the Basis of Scores Range of Score (in percentage)Rating of Agency/ Department/ Secretariat/ Ministry 80-100(a) Excellent 70-79(b) Very Good 50 - 59(d) Average 60-69(c) Good Less than 50(e) Poor 89 A n n e x e s Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Annex-1 Composition of Technical Committee to prepare MTSBP 90 Annexes 91 Annex-2 Table A 2.1: Indices of Area and Production of Crops (Base: 1984-85 = 100) Source: Agriculture Statistics Yearbook 2011, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 92 Source: Agriculture Statistics Yearbook 2011, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Table A 2.2: Indices of Area and Production of Crops (Base: 1984-85 = 100) Annexes 93 Table A 2.3: Indices of Area and Production of Crops (Base: 1984-85 = 100) Annex-3 3.1 Past Trends of Agricultural Inputs and Outputs We have fitted the following two relations for area, production and yields of major agricultural crops: Log (Yit) =  + T (1) Log (Yit) =  +  Log (Crop GDPt) (2) Where Yit stands for area/ production/ yield of a variable in year T and Crop GDPt stands crop and horticulture GDP at constant prices in year T. Equation (1) is the exponential time trends for various variables. Equation (2) is the standard log-linear equation relating a variable with the crop GDP. In fact, the regression coefficient ‘’ in Equation (2) yields the elasticity of a variable with respect to the crop and horticulture GDP, since  = dLog (Yit) / dLog (Crop GDPt) The fitted regression coefficients  and  are presented in Table A3.1. The results indicate that the crop-GDP has very high correlation and the elasticities of most of the agriculture inputs and outputs are statistically significant. The exponential time trends for area, production and yields for various crops indicate increasing trends except for areas and production for Aus and Aman rice, wheat, pulses, oilseeds and sugarcane. The coefficient of variation for most of the variables is very high. This implies that the areas, production and yields for various crops are unstable overtime due to uncertainties and risks caused by unfavorable monsoons and natural disasters. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 94 Table A 3.1: Regression Results of Exponential Time Trends and Log-Linear Regression Equations for Area, Production and Yields of Crops Ln(Yt)=�+�T Ln(Yt)=�+�Ln(GDP) Items � � R � � � R Average Annual Growth Rate CV (%) AusArea 8.41 -0.03 -0.69 11.63 -0.64 -0.57 -1.3 -703 AusProd 7.47 0.00 -0.01 6.61 0.15 0.15 2.9 519 AusYield 5.97 0.03 0.93 1.89 0.79 0.95 3.9 170 AmanArea 9.58 0.00 -0.28 9.78 -0.05 -0.13 0.0 -64026 AmanProd 9.13 0.01 0.37 7.12 0.38 0.51 2.4 405 AmanYield 6.46 0.01 0.71 4.25 0.42 0.82 2.2 261 BoroArea 8.71 0.03 0.97 4.53 0.81 0.96 2.5 99 BoroProd 8.58 0.05 0.97 0.69 1.53 0.96 5.0 110 BoroYield 6.77 0.02 0.97 3.07 0.72 0.95 2.4 131 Rice Area 10.07 0.01 0.60 8.88 0.22 0.72 0.7 364 RiceProd 9.62 0.03 0.94 4.57 0.97 0.98 3.5 113 RiceYield 6.45 0.02 0.98 2.60 0.74 0.99 2.8 93 WheatArea 8.79 -0.08 -0.96 21.05 -2.38 -0.92 -6.9 -85 WheatProd 8.29 -0.07 -0.76 16.85 -1.69 -0.64 -4.8 -268 AusArea 8.41 -0.03 -0.69 11.63 -0.64 -0.57 -1.3 -703 AusProd 7.47 0.00 -0.01 6.61 0.15 0.15 2.9 519 AusYield 5.97 0.03 0.93 1.89 0.79 0.95 3.9 170 AmanArea 9.58 0.00 -0.28 9.78 -0.05 -0.13 0.0 -64026 AmanProd 9.13 0.01 0.37 7.12 0.38 0.51 2.4 405 AmanYield 6.46 0.01 0.71 4.25 0.42 0.82 2.2 261 BoroArea 8.71 0.03 0.97 4.53 0.81 0.96 2.5 99 BoroProd 8.58 0.05 0.97 0.69 1.53 0.96 5.0 110 BoroYield 6.77 0.02 0.97 3.07 0.72 0.95 2.4 131 Rice Area 10.07 0.01 0.60 8.88 0.22 0.72 0.7 364 RiceProd 9.62 0.03 0.94 4.57 0.97 0.98 3.5 113 RiceYield 6.45 0.02 0.98 2.60 0.74 0.99 2.8 93 WheatAtt rea 8.79 -0.08 -0.96 21.05 -2.38 -0.92 -6.9 -85 WheatProd 8.29 -0.07 -0.76 16.85 -1.69 -0.64 -4.8 -268 Ln(Yt)=� +� T Ln(Yt)=� +� Ln(GDP)Items � � R � � � R AvAA erage Annual Growth Rate CV (%) Cont. Annexes 95 Ln(Yt)=�+�T Ln(Yt)=�+�Ln(GDP) Items � � R � � � R Average Annual Growth Rate CV (%) Ln(Yt)=� +� T Ln(Yt)=� +� Ln(GDP)Items � � R � � � R AvAA erage Annual Growth Rate CV (%) WheatYield 6.41 0.02 0.35 2.71 0.69 0.50 2.1 569 TobacoArea 3.82 0.03 0.62 -1.47 1.00 0.73 4.7 249 TobacoProd 2.80 0.05 0.71 -5.87 1.65 0.81 8.7 192 TobacoYield 5.89 0.02 0.83 2.50 0.65 0.89 3.5 183 PulseArea 8.29 -0.08 -0.93 20.27 -2.32 -0.90 -5.5 -168 PulseProd 6.82 -0.06 -0.90 15.80 -1.75 -0.87 -4.1 -214 PulsesYield 5.43 0.02 0.96 2.45 0.58 0.94 1.7 226 OilseedArea 6.90 -0.01 -0.42 7.48 -0.13 -0.24 -1.6 -314 OilseedProd 5.10 0.03 0.90 -0.37 1.05 0.94 0.5 2441 OilseedYield 5.11 0.04 0.93 -0.94 1.18 0.89 1.9 464 SpiceArea 6.72 -0.02 -0.45 9.22 -0.51 -0.33 0.4 4331 SpiceProd 3.98 0.14 0.94 -16.05 3.90 0.89 13.5 124 SpiceYield 4.17 0.16 0.89 -18.36 4.41 0.81 18.7 232 SugarcaneArea 6.66 -0.04 -0.93 12.99 -1.22 -0.96 -3.3 -145 SugarcaneProd 9.47 -0.04 -0.93 16.04 -1.27 -0.95 -3.2 -244 SugarcaneYield 9.72 0.00 -0.15 9.96 -0.05 -0.14 0.1 7299 JuteArea 6.66 0.02 0.36 2.86 0.71 0.50 6.7 324 JuteProd 6.13 0.03 0.58 -0.25 1.20 0.71 8.6 238 JuteYield 6.37 0.02 0.78 3.80 0.49 0.81 2.1 328 PotatoArea 5.31 0.07 0.97 -5.41 2.07 0.96 6.3 148 PotaHighrod 6.52 0.10 0.95 -8.79 2.96 0.95 11.8 182 PotatoYield 8.12 0.03 0.80 3.53 0.88 0.81 4.5 297 Disbursed 5.69 0.15 0.98 -17.26 4.44 0.97 15.2 118 Recovery 5.75 0.14 0.92 -17.02 4.37 0.97 14.5 106 Oustanding 8.08 0.08 0.97 -4.43 2.41 0.98 8.5 85 Urea 7.61 0.01 0.40 7.02 0.13 0.22 0.6 989 TSP 6.36 -0.02 -0.37 9.72 -0.66 -0.33 9.3 336 MOP 4.80 0.03 0.35 0.84 0.79 0.27 14.8 329 Gypsum 5.08 -0.02 -0.26 8.67 -0.67 -0.33 2.1 2176 Fertilizer 7.96 0.01 0.31 7.02 0.19 0.21 2.4 542 AusSeed 4.25 0.09 0.89 -7.23 2.26 0.78 5.7 361 AmanSeed 6.43 0.13 0.96 -13.09 3.79 0.93 10.0 239 BoroSeed 6.56 0.16 0.94 -17.77 4.73 0.89 17.1 150 WheatSeed 9.15 0.02 0.54 4.63 0.85 0.64 10.3 321 PotatoSeed 7.80 0.06 0.96 -1.99 1.89 0.97 6.5 129 MustardSeed 4.16 0.09 0.80 -10.28 2.78 0.82 10.8 241 Seeds 9.00 0.10 0.93 -5.57 2.82 0.91 10.1 137 CropsGDP 5.20 0.03 0.97 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.2 80.1 WheatYield 6.41 0.02 0.35 2.71 0.69 0.50 2.1 569 TobacoArea 3.82 0.03 0.62 -1.47 1.00 0.73 4.7 249 TobacoProd 2.80 0.05 0.71 -5.87 1.65 0.81 8.7 192 TobacoYield 5.89 0.02 0.83 2.50 0.65 0.89 3.5 183 PulseArea 8.29 -0.08 -0.93 20.27 -2.32 -0.90 -5.5 -168 PulseProd 6.82 -0.06 -0.90 15.80 -1.75 -0.87 -4.1 -214 PulsesYield 5.43 0.02 0.96 2.45 0.58 0.94 1.7 226 OilseedArea 6.90 -0.01 -0.42 7.48 -0.13 -0.24 -1.6 -314 OilseedProd 5.10 0.03 0.90 -0.37 1.05 0.94 0.5 2441 OilseedYield 5.11 0.04 0.93 -0.94 1.18 0.89 1.9 464 SpiceArea 6.72 -0.02 -0.45 9.22 -0.51 -0.33 0.4 4331 SpiceProd 3.98 0.14 0.94 -16.05 3.90 0.89 13.5 124 SpiceYield 4.17 0.16 0.89 -18.36 4.41 0.81 18.7 232 SugarcaneArea 6.66 -0.04 -0.93 12.99 -1.22 -0.96 -3.3 -145 SugarcaneProd 9.47 -0.04 -0.93 16.04 -1.27 -0.95 -3.2 -244 SugarcaneYield 9.72 0.00 -0.15 9.96 -0.05 -0.14 0.1 7299 JuteArea 6.66 0.02 0.36 2.86 0.71 0.50 6.7 324 JuteProd 6.13 0.03 0.58 -0.25 1.20 0.71 8.6 238 JuteYield 6.37 0.02 0.78 3.80 0.49 0.81 2.1 328 PotatoArea 5.31 0.07 0.97 -5.41 2.07 0.96 6.3 148 PotaHighrod 6.52 0.10 0.95 -8.79 2.96 0.95 11.8 182 PotatoYield 8.12 0.03 0.80 3.53 0.88 0.81 4.5 297 Disbursed 5.69 0.15 0.98 -17.26 4.44 0.97 15.2 118 Recoveryrr 5.75 0.14 0.92 -17.02 4.37 0.97 14.5 106 Oustanding 8.08 0.08 0.97 -4.43 2.41 0.98 8.5 85 Urea 7.61 0.01 0.40 7.02 0.13 0.22 0.6 989 TSP 6.36 -0.02 -0.37 9.72 -0.66 -0.33 9.3 336 MOP 4.80 0.03 0.35 0.84 0.79 0.27 14.8 329 Gypsum 5.08 -0.02 -0.26 8.67 -0.67 -0.33 2.1 2176 Fertrr ilizer 7.96 0.01 0.31 7.02 0.19 0.21 2.4 542 AusSeed 4.25 0.09 0.89 -7.23 2.26 0.78 5.7 361 AmanSeed 6.43 0.13 0.96 -13.09 3.79 0.93 10.0 239 BoroSeed 6.56 0.16 0.94 -17.77 4.73 0.89 17.1 150 WheatSeed 9.15 0.02 0.54 4.63 0.85 0.64 10.3 321 PotatoSeed 7.80 0.06 0.96 -1.99 1.89 0.97 6.5 129 MustardSeed 4.16 0.09 0.80 -10.28 2.78 0.82 10.8 241 Seeds 9.00 0.10 0.93 -5.57 2.82 0.91 10.1 137 CropsGDP 5.20 0.03 0.97 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.2 80.1 Note: CV stands for coefficient of variation. Source: Estimated by authors on the basis of data for the period 2000-01 to 2010-11 obtained from the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Annex-4 A 4.1 Methodology for the projections of KPIs for the LMs Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for both inputs and outputs are projected on the basis of the historical growth rates22 adjusted for large variations, if any. However, only individual items (say aus, aman, rabi rice) are projected by this method, while the aggregate (i.e. total rice) is estimated on the basis of balance equations to satisfy consistency among various variables and general equilibrium within the system. Historical Growth Rates: The methodology used is the standard time series analysis to estimate historical growth rates on the basis of three time trend growth rates as described below. a. Least-squares time trend growth rate (TRGR) This method is used by the IMF to forecast the country growth rates for their World Economic Outlook (WEO) published twice in a year, wherever there is past data for at least 9 years to permit a reliable calculation. The least-squares growth rate, r, is estimated by fitting a linear regression trend line to the logarithmic annual values of the variable in the relevant period. The regression equation takes the form Ln Yt = a + bt which is equivalent to the following compound growth equation, Yt = Yo (1 + r)t In this equation, Y is the variable, t is time, r is the trend growth rate, Ln is the natural logarithm, and a = log Yo and b = Ln (1 + r) are the parameters to be estimated. If b* is the least squares estimate of b, the average annual growth rate, r, is obtained as r = [exp(b*) – 1] and is multiplied by 100 to express it as a percentage. The calculated growth rate is an average rate that is representative of the growth of available observations over the entire period. It does not necessarily match the actual growth rate between any two years. b. Exponential growth rate (EXPGR) The exponential growth rate between two points in time for a variable is calculated from the following equation r = Ln (Yn /Y1)/(n-1)and is multiplied by 100 to express it as a percentage. WhereYn and Y1 are the last and first observation in the period, n is the number of observations in the period, and Ln is the natural logarithm operator. This growth rate is 96 22 This is the standard method used in statistics and econometrics for projecting a variable on the basis of past time series data. Experiences indicate that when the time trend is a good fit, the observed growth rate provides a very good estimate for the future growth rate. Annexes based on a model of continuous and exponential growth between two points in time. It does not take into account the intermediate values of the series. c. Average of Annual Growth rates (AVEGR) Average Annual Growth Rate (μ) =  GRi/n GRi= 100* (Yi / Yi-1 -1) for i = 1, 2, … n for the past n years. CV = 100* SD/μ SD² =  (GRi- μ)²/n Where GRi stands for growth rate for the i-th year, CV for coefficient of variation and SD for standard deviation. A 4.2 Year wise projections of KPIs for the planning horizon After estimating these three kinds of growth rates, projected growth rate (PGR) for any KPI for the planning period is assumed to be equal to the minimum of the three historical growth rates. PGR = Minimum (EXPGR, TRGR, AVEGR) Thus KPIi for the t-th year is projected by the following formula: KPIit = KPI2009 (1+0.01*PGR)t This method of projection is based on the following set of assumptions: 1. There will be no major monsoon failures or no internal or external shocks during the planning period which might have adverse impact on agriculture. 2. The Government will continue to pursue the existing favorable policy package for agriculture. 3. Past trends and pattern of crop production and areas under cultivation of various crops will continue in future. Projected KPIs for various crops under these assumptions and the methodology are presented in the Tables A4.1 to A4.6. It may be noticed that the projected KPIs for some of the outputs (such as rice and wheat) are significantly different from those projected under the MBF for the Budget 2012-13 presented in Table A4.7. The differences are due to the following reasons: a. Coverage and definitions of crops are different as our analysis is based on the data obtained from the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. b. Our projections are consistent with the Sixth Five Year Plan target of about 5 percent growth rate for the crops and horticulture subsector within agriculture. c. As MBF projections are made within MTBF expenditure ceilings for the Agriculture Ministry, there is no guarantee that the Sixth Plan targets will be realised either for the crops sub-sector or for the overall agriculture sector. 97 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 98 Table A 4.1: Past Trends (2001-2010) and Projections of Key Performance Indicators for 2011-2016 (Area in '000 Acres, Production in '000 M Tons and Yield in Kg per Acre) Items Aus Area Aus Prod Aus Yield Aman Area Aman Prod Aman Yield Boro Area Boro Prod Boro Yield 2000-01 3274 1916 585 14110 11249 797 9295 11920 1282 2001-02 3069 1808 589 13955 10726 769 9319 11766 1263 2002-03 3073 1850 602 14041 11115 792 9501 12222 1286 2003-04 2971 1832 617 14030 11521 821 9745 12837 1317 2004-05 2532 1500 592 13047 9820 753 10042 13837 1378 2005-06 2556 1745 683 13416 10810 806 10047 13975 1391 2006-07 2238 1512 676 13382 10841 810 10496 14965 1426 2007-08 2270 1507 664 12474 9662 775 11385 17762 1560 2008-09 2633 1895 720 13585 11613 855 11654 17809 1528 2009-10 2432 1709 703 13993 12207 872 11811 18341 1553 2010-11 2750 2133 776 13951 12792 917 11788 18617 1579 Ln(Yt)=�+�T � 8.41 7.47 5.97 9.58 9.13 6.46 8.71 8.58 6.77 � -0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.02 R -0.69 -0.01 0.93 -0.28 0.37 0.71 0.97 0.97 0.97 Ln(Yt)=�+ �Ln(CropGDP) � 11.63 6.61 1.89 9.78 7.12 4.25 4.53 0.69 3.07 � -0.64 0.15 0.79 -0.05 0.38 0.42 0.81 1.53 0.72 R -0.57 0.15 0.95 -0.13 0.51 0.82 0.96 0.96 0.95 ExpGR -1.74 1.07 2.82 -0.11 1.29 1.40 2.38 4.46 2.08 TRGR -2.54 -0.02 2.58 -0.32 0.91 1.23 2.74 5.25 2.44 AveGR -1.35 2.86 3.90 -0.01 2.42 2.23 2.48 5.00 2.40 CV(%) -703 519 170 - 405 261 99 110 131 Proj. Method MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd PGR -2.54 -0.02 Derivd -0.32 0.91 Derivd 2.38 2.00 Derivd Projected P2011-12 2680 2132 796 13907 12908 928 12068 18989 1574 P2012-13 2612 2132 816 13862 13025 940 12355 19369 1568 P2013-14 2546 2131 837 13818 13143 951 12648 19757 1562 P2014-15 2481 2131 859 13775 13262 963 12949 20152 1556 P2015-16 2418 2130 881 13731 13382 975 13257 20555 1551 P2016-17 2357 2130 904 13687 13503 987 13572 20966 1545 Annual GR 2000-01 -1.9 10.5 12.7 0.1 9.2 9.1 3.0 8.1 4.9 2001-02 -6.3 -5.6 0.7 -1.1 -4.6 -3.6 0.3 -1.3 -1.5 2002-03 0.1 2.3 2.2 0.6 3.6 3.0 2.0 3.9 1.9 2003-04 -3.3 -1.0 2.4 -0.1 3.7 3.7 2.6 5.0 2.4 2004-05 -14.8 -18.1 -3.9 -7.0 -14.8 -8.3 3.0 7.8 4.6 2005-06 0.9 16.3 15.2 2.8 10.1 7.1 0.0 1.0 0.9 2006-07 -12.4 -13.4 -1.0 -0.3 0.3 0.5 4.5 7.1 2.5 2007-08 1.4 -0.3 -1.7 -6.8 -10.9 -4.4 8.5 18.7 9.4 2008-09 16.0 25.7 8.4 8.9 20.2 10.4 2.4 0.3 -2.0 2009-10 -7.6 -9.8 -2.4 3.0 5.1 2.1 1.3 3.0 1.6 2010-11 13.1 24.8 10.4 -0.3 4.8 5.1 -0.2 1.5 1.7 Plan Period -2.5 0.0 2.6 -0.3 0.9 1.2 2.4 2.0 -0.4 2000-01 3274 1916 585 14110 11249 797 9295 11920 1282 2001-02 3069 1808 589 13955 10726 769 9319 11766 1263 2002-03 3073 1850 602 14041 11115 792 9501 12222 1286 2003-04 2971 1832 617 14030 11521 821 9745 12837 1317 2004-05 2532 1500 592 13047 9820 753 10042 13837 1378 2005-06 2556 1745 683 13416 10810 806 10047 13975 1391 2006-07 2238 1512 676 13382 10841 810 10496 14965 1426 2007-08 2270 1507 664 12474 9662 775 11385 17762 1560 2008-09 2633 1895 720 13585 11613 855 11654 17809 1528 2009-10 2432 1709 703 13993 12207 872 11811 18341 1553 2010-11 2750 2133 776 13951 12792 917 11788 18617 1579 Ln(Yt)=� +� T � 8.41 7.47 5.97 9.58 9.13 6.46 8.71 8.58 6.77 � -0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.02 R -0.69 -0.01 0.93 -0.28 0.37 0.71 0.97 0.97 0.97 Ln(Yt)=� + � Ln(CropGDP) � 11.63 6.61 1.89 9.78 7.12 4.25 4.53 0.69 3.07 � -0.64 0.15 0.79 -0.05 0.38 0.42 0.81 1.53 0.72 R -0.57 0.15 0.95 -0.13 0.51 0.82 0.96 0.96 0.95 ExpGR -1.74 1.07 2.82 -0.11 1.29 1.40 2.38 4.46 2.08 TRGR -2.54 -0.02 2.58 -0.32 0.91 1.23 2.74 5.25 2.44 AvAA eGR -1.35 2.86 3.90 -0.01 2.42 2.23 2.48 5.00 2.40 CV(%) -703 519 170 - 405 261 99 110 131 Projo . Method MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd PGR -2.54 -0.02 Derivd -0.32 0.91 Derivd 2.38 2.00 Derivd Projo ected P2011-12 2680 2132 796 13907 12908 928 12068 18989 1574 P2012-13 2612 2132 816 13862 13025 940 12355 19369 1568 P2013-14 2546 2131 837 13818 13143 951 12648 19757 1562 P2014-15 2481 2131 859 13775 13262 963 12949 20152 1556 P2015-16 2418 2130 881 13731 13382 975 13257 20555 1551 P2016-17 2357 2130 904 13687 13503 987 13572 20966 1545 Annual GR 2000-01 -1.9 10.5 12.7 0.1 9.2 9.1 3.0 8.1 4.9 2001-02 -6.3 -5.6 0.7 -1.1 -4.6 -3.6 0.3 -1.3 -1.5 2002-03 0.1 2.3 2.2 0.6 3.6 3.0 2.0 3.9 1.9 2003-04 -3.3 -1.0 2.4 -0.1 3.7 3.7 2.6 5.0 2.4 2004-05 -14.8 -18.1 -3.9 -7.0 -14.8 -8.3 3.0 7.8 4.6 2005-06 0.9 16.3 15.2 2.8 10.1 7.1 0.0 1.0 0.9 2006-07 -12.4 -13.4 -1.0 -0.3 0.3 0.5 4.5 7.1 2.5 2007-08 1.4 -0.3 -1.7 -6.8 -10.9 -4.4 8.5 18.7 9.4 2008-09 16.0 25.7 8.4 8.9 20.2 10.4 2.4 0.3 -2.0 2009-10 -7.6 -9.8 -2.4 3.0 5.1 2.1 1.3 3.0 1.6 2010-11 13.1 24.8 10.4 -0.3 4.8 5.1 -0.2 1.5 1.7 Plan Period -2.5 0.0 2.6 -0.3 0.9 1.2 2.4 2.0 -0.4 Items Aus Area Aus Prod Aus Yield Aman Area Aman Prod Aman Yield Boro Area Boro Prod Boro Yield Annexes 99 Table A 4.2 Past Trends (2001-2010) and Projections of Key Performance Indicators for 2011-2016 (Area in '000 Acres, Production in '000 M Tons and Yield in Kg per Acre) Items Rice Area Rice Prod Rice Yield Wheat Area Wheat Prod Wheat Yield Pulse Area Pulse Prod Pulses yield 2000-01 26679 25085 940 1909 1673 876 1170 366 313 2001-02 26343 24300 922 1833 1606 876 1116 342 306 2002-03 26615 25187 946 1746 1507 863 1108 349 315 2003-04 26746 26190 979 1586 1253 790 1039 333 321 2004-05 25621 25157 982 1380 976 707 947 316 334 2005-06 26019 26530 1020 1183 735 621 833 279 335 2006-07 26116 27318 1046 988 737 746 769 258 336 2007-08 26129 28931 1107 958 844 881 558 204 366 2008-09 27872 31317 1124 975 849 871 559 196 351 2009-10 28236 32257 1142 922 969 1051 593 221 373 2010-11 28489 33542 1177 923 972 1053 627 232 370 Ln(Yt)=�+�T � 10.07 9.62 6.45 8.79 8.29 6.41 8.29 6.82 5.43 � 0.01 0.03 0.02 -0.08 -0.07 0.02 -0.08 -0.06 0.02 R 0.60 0.94 0.98 -0.96 -0.76 0.35 -0.93 -0.90 0.96 Ln(Yt)=�+�Ln(Crop GDP) � 8.88 4.57 2.60 21.05 16.85 2.71 20.27 15.80 2.45 � 0.22 0.97 0.74 -2.38 -1.69 0.69 -2.32 -1.75 0.58 R 0.72 0.98 0.99 -0.92 -0.64 0.50 -0.90 -0.87 0.94 ExpGR 0.66 2.91 2.25 -7.27 -5.43 1.84 -6.24 -4.56 1.68 TRGR 0.62 3.12 2.48 -7.95 -6.47 1.61 -7.65 -5.84 1.96 AveGR 0.70 3.53 2.79 -6.86 -4.82 2.12 -5.50 -4.09 1.65 CV(%) 364 113 93 -85 -268 569 -168 -214 226 Proj. Method Derivd Derivd Derivd AveGR AveGR Derivd AveGR AveGR Derivd PGR Derivd Derivd Derivd 1.00 2.00 Derivd 1.00 2.00 Derivd Projected P2011-12 28655 34030 1188 932 991 1064 633 237 374 P2012-13 28829 34526 1198 942 1011 1074 640 241 377 P2013-14 29012 35031 1207 951 1031 1085 646 246 381 P2014-15 29204 35544 1217 960 1052 1095 652 251 385 P2015-16 29405 36067 1227 970 1073 1106 659 256 389 P2016-17 29615 36598 1236 980 1095 1117 666 261 393 Annual GR 2000-01 0.8 8.8 7.8 -7.2 -9.1 -2.0 -5.0 -4.4 0.5 2001-02 -1.3 -3.1 -1.9 -4.0 -4.0 0.0 -4.6 -6.6 -2.0 2002-03 1.0 3.7 2.6 -4.7 -6.2 -1.5 -0.7 2.0 2.8 2003-04 0.5 4.0 3.5 -9.2 -16.9 -8.5 -6.2 -4.6 1.8 2004-05 -4.2 -3.9 0.3 -13.0 -22.1 -10.5 -8.9 -5.1 4.1 2005-06 1.6 5.5 3.8 -14.3 -24.7 -12.2 -12.0 -11.7 0.4 2006-07 0.4 3.0 2.6 -16.5 0.3 20.1 -7.7 -7.5 0.2 2007-08 0.0 5.9 5.9 -3.0 14.5 18.1 -27.4 -20.9 9.0 2008-09 6.7 8.2 1.5 1.8 0.6 -1.2 0.2 -3.9 -4.1 2009-10 1.3 3.0 1.7 -5.4 14.1 20.7 6.1 12.8 6.3 2010-11 0.9 4.0 3.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 5.7 5.0 -0.7 Plan Period 0.6 1.5 0.8 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2000-01 26679 25085 940 1909 1673 876 1170 366 313 2001-02 26343 24300 922 1833 1606 876 1116 342 306 2002-03 26615 25187 946 1746 1507 863 1108 349 315 2003-04 26746 26190 979 1586 1253 790 1039 333 321 2004-05 25621 25157 982 1380 976 707 947 316 334 2005-06 26019 26530 1020 1183 735 621 833 279 335 2006-07 26116 27318 1046 988 737 746 769 258 336 2007-08 26129 28931 1107 958 844 881 558 204 366 2008-09 27872 31317 1124 975 849 871 559 196 351 2009-10 28236 32257 1142 922 969 1051 593 221 373 2010-11 28489 33542 1177 923 972 1053 627 232 370 Ln(Yt)=� +� T � 10.07 9.62 6.45 8.79 8.29 6.41 8.29 6.82 5.43 � 0.01 0.03 0.02 -0.08 -0.07 0.02 -0.08 -0.06 0.02 R 0.60 0.94 0.98 -0.96 -0.76 0.35 -0.93 -0.90 0.96 Ln(Yt)=� +� Ln(Crop GDP) � 8.88 4.57 2.60 21.05 16.85 2.71 20.27 15.80 2.45 � 0.22 0.97 0.74 -2.38 -1.69 0.69 -2.32 -1.75 0.58 R 0.72 0.98 0.99 -0.92 -0.64 0.50 -0.90 -0.87 0.94 ExpGR 0.66 2.91 2.25 -7.27 -5.43 1.84 -6.24 -4.56 1.68 TRGR 0.62 3.12 2.48 -7.95 -6.47 1.61 -7.65 -5.84 1.96 AvAA eGR 0.70 3.53 2.79 -6.86 -4.82 2.12 -5.50 -4.09 1.65 CV(%) 364 113 93 -85 -268 569 -168 -214 226 Projo . Method Derivd Derivd Derivd AveGR AveGR Derivd AveGR AveGR Derivd PGR Derivd Derivd Derivd 1.00 2.00 Derivd 1.00 2.00 Derivd Projo ected P2011-12 28655 34030 1188 932 991 1064 633 237 374 P2012-13 28829 34526 1198 942 1011 1074 640 241 377 P2013-14 29012 35031 1207 951 1031 1085 646 246 381 P2014-15 29204 35544 1217 960 1052 1095 652 251 385 P2015-16 29405 36067 1227 970 1073 1106 659 256 389 P2016-17 29615 36598 1236 980 1095 1117 666 261 393 Annual GR 2000-01 0.8 8.8 7.8 -7.2 -9.1 -2.0 -5.0 -4.4 0.5 2001-02 -1.3 -3.1 -1.9 -4.0 -4.0 0.0 -4.6 -6.6 -2.0 2002-03 1.0 3.7 2.6 -4.7 -6.2 -1.5 -0.7 2.0 2.8 2003-04 0.5 4.0 3.5 -9.2 -16.9 -8.5 -6.2 -4.6 1.8 2004-05 -4.2 -3.9 0.3 -13.0 -22.1 -10.5 -8.9 -5.1 4.1 2005-06 1.6 5.5 3.8 -14.3 -24.7 -12.2 -12.0 -11.7 0.4 2006-07 0.4 3.0 2.6 -16.5 0.3 20.1 -7.7 -7.5 0.2 2007-08 0.0 5.9 5.9 -3.0 14.5 18.1 -27.4 -20.9 9.0 2008-09 6.7 8.2 1.5 1.8 0.6 -1.2 0.2 -3.9 -4.1 2009-10 1.3 3.0 1.7 -5.4 14.1 20.7 6.1 12.8 6.3 2010-11 0.9 4.0 3.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 5.7 5.0 -0.7 Plan Period 0.6 1.5 0.8 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Items Rice Area Rice Prod Rice Yield Wheat Area Wheat Prod Wheat Yield Pulse Area Pulse Prod Pulses yield Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 100 Table A 4.3: Past Trends (2001-2010) and Projections of Key Performance Indicators for 2011-2016 (Area in '000 Acres, Production in '000 M Tons and Yield in Kg per Acre) Items Oilsed Area Oilsed Prod Oilsed Yield Spice Area Spice Prod Spice yield Sugarcan Area Sugarcan Prod Sugarcn Yield 2000-01 948 292 308 588 397 675 417 6742 16168 2001-02 909 285 314 622 417 670 402 6502 16174 2002-03 897 277 309 625 425 680 410 6838 16678 2003-04 850 270 318 667 608 912 404 6484 16050 2004-05 828 304 367 364 1000 2747 388 6423 16554 2005-06 823 322 391 442 1184 2679 377 5511 14618 2006-07 841 683 812 683 1406 2059 371 5770 15553 2007-08 875 701 801 701 1390 1983 312 4984 15974 2008-09 1200 661 551 661 1213 1835 312 5233 16772 2009-10 1250 750 600 750 1350 1800 290 4491 15486 2010-11 1300 840 646 850 1473 1733 287 4671 16275 Ln(Yt)=�+�T � 6.22 3.59 4.28 5.84 3.91 4.97 6.66 9.47 9.72 � 0.03 0.13 0.09 0.03 0.14 0.11 -0.04 -0.04 0.00 R 0.64 0.90 0.82 0.42 0.92 0.71 -0.93 -0.93 -0.15 Ln(Yt)=�+�Ln(Crop GDP) � 0.09 -16.60 -9.78 -0.25 -16.57 -9.41 12.99 16.04 9.96 � 1.16 3.89 2.73 1.14 4.00 2.86 -1.22 -1.27 -0.05 R 0.76 0.92 0.80 0.55 0.84 0.59 -0.96 -0.95 -0.14 ExpGR 3.16 10.57 7.41 3.69 13.11 9.43 -3.74 -3.67 0.07 TRGR 3.29 13.36 9.75 2.97 15.50 12.17 -3.85 -4.02 -0.17 AveGR 2.32 10.66 8.98 5.60 14.18 17.94 -3.31 -3.20 0.08 CV(%) 541 334 393 425 156 347 -145 -244 7299 Proj. Method MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd PGR 2.32 7.40 Derivd 2.97 9.18 Derivd 2.00 3.00 Derivd Projected P2011-12 1330 902 678 875 1608 1837 293 4811 16435 P2012-13 1361 969 712 901 1756 1948 299 4955 16596 P2013-14 1393 1041 747 928 1917 2066 305 5104 16759 P2014-15 1425 1117 784 956 2093 2190 311 5257 16923 P2015-16 1458 1200 823 984 2285 2322 317 5415 17089 P2016-17 1492 1289 864 1013 2495 2462 323 5577 17256 Annual GR 2000-01 -12.1 -28.1 -18.2 -5.6 -2.2 3.6 -1.0 -2.4 -1.5 2001-02 -4.1 -2.4 1.8 5.8 5.0 -0.7 -3.6 -3.6 0.0 2002-03 -1.3 -2.8 -1.5 0.5 1.9 1.4 2.0 5.2 3.1 2003-04 -5.2 -2.5 2.9 6.7 43.1 34.1 -1.5 -5.2 -3.8 2004-05 -2.6 12.6 15.6 -45.4 64.5 201.4 -4.0 -0.9 3.1 2005-06 -0.6 5.9 6.6 21.4 18.4 -2.5 -2.8 -14.2 -11.7 2006-07 2.2 112.1 107.6 54.5 18.8 -23.2 -1.6 4.7 6.4 2007-08 4.0 2.6 -1.4 2.6 -1.1 -3.7 -15.9 -13.6 2.7 2008-09 37.1 -5.7 -31.2 -5.7 -12.7 -7.5 0.0 5.0 5.0 2009-10 4.2 13.5 8.9 13.5 11.3 -1.9 -7.1 -14.2 -7.7 2010-11 4.0 12.0 7.7 13.3 9.1 -3.7 -1.0 4.0 5.1 Plan Period 2.3 7.4 5.0 3.0 9.2 6.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2000-01 948 292 308 588 397 675 417 6742 16168 2001-02 909 285 314 622 417 670 402 6502 16174 2002-03 897 277 309 625 425 680 410 6838 16678 2003-04 850 270 318 667 608 912 404 6484 16050 2004-05 828 304 367 364 1000 2747 388 6423 16554 2005-06 823 322 391 442 1184 2679 377 5511 14618 2006-07 841 683 812 683 1406 2059 371 5770 15553 2007-08 875 701 801 701 1390 1983 312 4984 15974 2008-09 1200 661 551 661 1213 1835 312 5233 16772 2009-10 1250 750 600 750 1350 1800 290 4491 15486 2010-11 1300 840 646 850 1473 1733 287 4671 16275 Ln(Yt)=� +� T � 6.22 3.59 4.28 5.84 3.91 4.97 6.66 9.47 9.72 � 0.03 0.13 0.09 0.03 0.14 0.11 -0.04 -0.04 0.00 R 0.64 0.90 0.82 0.42 0.92 0.71 -0.93 -0.93 -0.15 Ln(Yt)=� +� Ln(Crop GDP) � 0.09 -16.60 -9.78 -0.25 -16.57 -9.41 12.99 16.04 9.96 � 1.16 3.89 2.73 1.14 4.00 2.86 -1.22 -1.27 -0.05 R 0.76 0.92 0.80 0.55 0.84 0.59 -0.96 -0.95 -0.14 ExpGR 3.16 10.57 7.41 3.69 13.11 9.43 -3.74 -3.67 0.07 TRGR 3.29 13.36 9.75 2.97 15.50 12.17 -3.85 -4.02 -0.17 AvAA eGR 2.32 10.66 8.98 5.60 14.18 17.94 -3.31 -3.20 0.08 CV(%) 541 334 393 425 156 347 -145 -244 7299 Projo . Method MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd PGR 2.32 7.40 Derivd 2.97 9.18 Derivd 2.00 3.00 Derivd Projo ected P2011-12 1330 902 678 875 1608 1837 293 4811 16435 P2012-13 1361 969 712 901 1756 1948 299 4955 16596 P2013-14 1393 1041 747 928 1917 2066 305 5104 16759 P2014-15 1425 1117 784 956 2093 2190 311 5257 16923 P2015-16 1458 1200 823 984 2285 2322 317 5415 17089 P2016-17 1492 1289 864 1013 2495 2462 323 5577 17256 Annual GR 2000-01 -12.1 -28.1 -18.2 -5.6 -2.2 3.6 -1.0 -2.4 -1.5 2001-02 -4.1 -2.4 1.8 5.8 5.0 -0.7 -3.6 -3.6 0.0 2002-03 -1.3 -2.8 -1.5 0.5 1.9 1.4 2.0 5.2 3.1 2003-04 -5.2 -2.5 2.9 6.7 43.1 34.1 -1.5 -5.2 -3.8 2004-05 -2.6 12.6 15.6 -45.4 64.5 201.4 -4.0 -0.9 3.1 2005-06 -0.6 5.9 6.6 21.4 18.4 -2.5 -2.8 -14.2 -11.7 2006-07 2.2 112.1 107.6 54.5 18.8 -23.2 -1.6 4.7 6.4 2007-08 4.0 2.6 -1.4 2.6 -1.1 -3.7 -15.9 -13.6 2.7 2008-09 37.1 -5.7 -31.2 -5.7 -12.7 -7.5 0.0 5.0 5.0 2009-10 4.2 13.5 8.9 13.5 11.3 -1.9 -7.1 -14.2 -7.7 2010-11 4.0 12.0 7.7 13.3 9.1 -3.7 -1.0 4.0 5.1 Plan Period 2.3 7.4 5.0 3.0 9.2 6.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 Items Oilsed Area Oilsed Prod Oilsed Yield Spice Area Spice Prod Spice yield Sugarcan Area Sugarcan Prod Sugarcn Yield Annexes 101 Table A 4.4 Past Trends (2001-2010) and Projections of Key Performance Indicators for 2011-2016 (Area in '000 Acres, Production in '000 M Tons and Yield in Kg per Acre) Items Jute Area Jute Prod Jute Yield Potato Area Potato Prod Potato Yield Maize Area Maize Prod Maize Yield 2000-01 1107 821 742 615 3216 5229 11 10 909 2001-02 1128 859 762 587 2994 5101 49 64 1306 2002-03 1079 800 741 606 3386 5587 72 117 1625 2003-04 1008 794 788 669 3907 5840 124 241 1944 2004-05 965 717 743 806 4855 6024 165 356 2158 2005-06 993 836 842 744 4161 5593 243 522 2148 2006-07 1034 884 855 852 5167 6065 373 902 2418 2007-08 1089 837 769 993 6648 6695 553 1346 2434 2008-09 1039 847 815 978 5268 5387 317 730 2303 2009-10 1029 922 896 1120 8168 7293 376 887 2359 2010-11 1751 1521 869 1137 8328 7325 425 1002 2358 Ln(Yt)=�+�T � 6.66 6.13 6.37 5.31 6.52 8.12 -0.92 -1.79 6.03 � 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.10 0.03 0.30 0.38 0.08 R 0.36 0.58 0.78 0.97 0.95 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.84 Ln(Yt)=�+�Ln(Crop GDP) � 2.86 -0.25 3.80 -5.41 -8.79 3.53 -41.64 -52.38 -3.84 � 0.71 1.20 0.49 2.07 2.96 0.88 8.00 9.96 1.95 R 0.50 0.71 0.81 0.96 0.95 0.81 0.78 0.77 0.71 ExpGR 4.59 6.17 1.58 6.15 9.51 3.37 36.54 46.07 9.53 TRGR 1.70 3.31 1.58 7.19 10.34 2.94 35.21 45.99 7.98 AveGR 6.68 8.62 2.13 6.34 11.84 4.53 61.20 98.53 17.30 CV(%) 324 238 328 148 182 297 162 157 149 Proj. Method MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd PGR 1.70 3.31 Derivd 6.15 9.51 Derivd 8.00 12.00 Derivd Projected P2011-12 1781 1571 882 1207 9120 7557 459 1122 2445 P2012-13 1811 1623 896 1281 9988 7797 496 1257 2536 P2013-14 1842 1677 911 1360 10939 8044 535 1408 2629 P2014-15 1873 1733 925 1443 11979 8300 578 1577 2727 P2015-16 1905 1790 940 1532 13119 8563 624 1766 2828 P2016-17 1938 1849 954 1626 14367 8835 674 1978 2933 Annual GR 2000-01 9.8 15.5 5.1 2.3 9.6 7.2 37.5 150.0 81.8 2001-02 1.9 4.6 2.7 -4.6 -6.9 -2.5 345.5 540.0 43.7 2002-03 -4.3 -6.9 -2.6 3.2 13.1 9.5 46.9 82.8 24.4 2003-04 -6.6 -0.7 6.2 10.4 15.4 4.5 72.2 106.0 19.6 2004-05 -4.3 -9.7 -5.7 20.5 24.3 3.1 33.1 47.7 11.0 2005-06 2.9 16.6 13.3 -7.7 -14.3 -7.2 47.3 46.6 -0.4 2006-07 4.1 5.7 1.5 14.5 24.2 8.4 53.5 72.8 12.6 2007-08 5.3 -5.3 -10.1 16.5 28.7 10.4 48.3 49.2 0.7 2008-09 -4.6 1.2 6.1 -1.5 -20.8 -19.5 -42.7 -45.8 -5.4 2009-10 -1.0 8.9 9.9 14.5 55.0 35.4 18.6 21.5 2.4 2010-11 70.2 65.0 -3.1 1.5 2.0 0.4 13.0 13.0 -0.1 Plan Period 1.7 3.3 1.6 6.1 9.5 3.2 8.0 12.0 3.7 2000-01 1107 821 742 615 3216 5229 11 10 909 2001-02 1128 859 762 587 2994 5101 49 64 1306 2002-03 1079 800 741 606 3386 5587 72 117 1625 2003-04 1008 794 788 669 3907 5840 124 241 1944 2004-05 965 717 743 806 4855 6024 165 356 2158 2005-06 993 836 842 744 4161 5593 243 522 2148 2006-07 1034 884 855 852 5167 6065 373 902 2418 2007-08 1089 837 769 993 6648 6695 553 1346 2434 2008-09 1039 847 815 978 5268 5387 317 730 2303 2009-10 1029 922 896 1120 8168 7293 376 887 2359 2010-11 1751 1521 869 1137 8328 7325 425 1002 2358 Ln(Yt)=� +� T � 6.66 6.13 6.37 5.31 6.52 8.12 -0.92 -1.79 6.03 � 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.10 0.03 0.30 0.38 0.08 R 0.36 0.58 0.78 0.97 0.95 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.84 Ln(Yt)=� +� Ln(Crop GDP) � 2.86 -0.25 3.80 -5.41 -8.79 3.53 -41.64 -52.38 -3.84 � 0.71 1.20 0.49 2.07 2.96 0.88 8.00 9.96 1.95 R 0.50 0.71 0.81 0.96 0.95 0.81 0.78 0.77 0.71 ExpGR 4.59 6.17 1.58 6.15 9.51 3.37 36.54 46.07 9.53 TRGR 1.70 3.31 1.58 7.19 10.34 2.94 35.21 45.99 7.98 AvAA eGR 6.68 8.62 2.13 6.34 11.84 4.53 61.20 98.53 17.30 CV(%) 324 238 328 148 182 297 162 157 149 Projo . Method MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd MinGR MinGR Derivd PGR 1.70 3.31 Derivd 6.15 9.51 Derivd 8.00 12.00 Derivd Projo ected P2011-12 1781 1571 882 1207 9120 7557 459 1122 2445 P2012-13 1811 1623 896 1281 9988 7797 496 1257 2536 P2013-14 1842 1677 911 1360 10939 8044 535 1408 2629 P2014-15 1873 1733 925 1443 11979 8300 578 1577 2727 P2015-16 1905 1790 940 1532 13119 8563 624 1766 2828 P2016-17 1938 1849 954 1626 14367 8835 674 1978 2933 Annual GR 2000-01 9.8 15.5 5.1 2.3 9.6 7.2 37.5 150.0 81.8 2001-02 1.9 4.6 2.7 -4.6 -6.9 -2.5 345.5 540.0 43.7 2002-03 -4.3 -6.9 -2.6 3.2 13.1 9.5 46.9 82.8 24.4 2003-04 -6.6 -0.7 6.2 10.4 15.4 4.5 72.2 106.0 19.6 2004-05 -4.3 -9.7 -5.7 20.5 24.3 3.1 33.1 47.7 11.0 2005-06 2.9 16.6 13.3 -7.7 -14.3 -7.2 47.3 46.6 -0.4 2006-07 4.1 5.7 1.5 14.5 24.2 8.4 53.5 72.8 12.6 2007-08 5.3 -5.3 -10.1 16.5 28.7 10.4 48.3 49.2 0.7 2008-09 -4.6 1.2 6.1 -1.5 -20.8 -19.5 -42.7 -45.8 -5.4 2009-10 -1.0 8.9 9.9 14.5 55.0 35.4 18.6 21.5 2.4 2010-11 70.2 65.0 -3.1 1.5 2.0 0.4 13.0 13.0 -0.1 Plan Period 1.7 3.3 1.6 6.1 9.5 3.2 8.0 12.0 3.7 Items Jute Area Jute Prod Jute Yield Potato Area Potato Prod Potato Yield Maize Area Maize Prod Maize Yield Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 102 Table A 4.5: Past Trends (2001-2010) and Projections of Key Performance Indicators for 2011-2016 (Agricultural Credits in Crore Taka and Fertilizers Use in '000 M Ton) Items Credit Disbursd Credit Recovered Credit Oustnding Urea TSP MOP Gypsum Fertilizer 2000-01 3020 2878 11137 2121 399 124 102 2991 2001-02 2955 3260 11498 2247 401 233 116 3285 2002-03 3278 3516 11913 2247 375 271 151 3339 2003-04 4048 3135 12706 2324 361 240 140 3364 2004-05 4957 3171 14040 2523 420 260 136 3755 2005-06 5496 4164 15377 2451 436 291 105 3683 2006-07 5293 4676 14583 2515 340 230 72 3551 2007-08 8581 6004 17823 2685 380 380 160 4090 2008-09 9285 8378 19598 2400 200 150 100 3005 2009-10 11117 10113 22589 2300 300 210 100 3134 2010-11 12184 12149 25492 2253 435 365 105 3817 Ln(Yt)=�+�T � 5.69 5.75 8.08 7.61 6.36 4.80 5.08 7.96 � 0.15 0.14 0.08 0.01 -0.02 0.03 -0.02 0.01 R 0.98 0.92 0.97 0.40 -0.37 0.35 -0.26 0.31 Ln(Yt)=�+�Ln(CropGDP) � -17.26 -17.02 -4.43 7.02 9.72 0.84 8.67 7.02 � 4.44 4.37 2.41 0.13 -0.66 0.79 -0.67 0.19 R 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.22 -0.33 0.27 -0.33 0.21 ExpGR 13.95 14.40 8.28 0.60 0.86 10.80 0.29 2.44 TRGR 15.96 14.82 8.18 0.78 -2.35 3.45 -1.73 0.93 AveGR 15.23 14.53 8.48 0.57 9.26 14.77 2.11 2.38 CV(%) 118 106 85 989 336 329 2176 542 Proj. Method MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR PGR 13.95 14.40 8.18 0.57 -2.35 3.45 -1.73 0.93 Projected P2011-12 13884 13898 27577 2266 425 378 103 3852 P2012-13 15821 15900 29832 2279 415 391 101 3888 P2013-14 18028 18190 32272 2291 405 404 100 3924 P2014-15 20543 20809 34911 2304 396 418 98 3960 P2015-16 23408 23806 37766 2318 386 432 96 3997 P2016-17 26674 27234 40854 2331 377 447 95 4034 Annual GR 2000-01 5.9 -4.0 4.6 -1.4 54.1 -48.1 -46.0 -6.9 2001-02 -2.1 13.3 3.2 5.9 0.5 87.9 13.7 9.8 2002-03 10.9 7.9 3.6 0.0 -6.5 16.3 30.2 1.6 2003-04 23.5 -10.8 6.7 3.4 -3.7 -11.4 -7.3 0.7 2004-05 22.4 1.1 10.5 8.6 16.3 8.3 -2.9 11.6 2005-06 10.9 31.3 9.5 -2.9 3.8 11.9 -22.8 -1.9 2006-07 -3.7 12.3 -5.2 2.6 -22.0 -21.0 -31.4 -3.6 2007-08 62.1 28.4 22.2 6.8 11.8 65.2 122.2 15.2 2008-09 8.2 39.5 10.0 -10.6 -47.4 -60.5 -37.5 -26.5 2009-10 19.7 20.7 15.3 -4.2 50.0 40.0 0.0 4.3 2010-11 9.6 20.1 12.9 -2.0 45.0 73.8 5.0 21.8 Plan Period 13.9 14.4 8.2 0.6 -2.4 3.4 -1.7 0.9 2000-01 3020 2878 11137 2121 399 124 102 2991 2001-02 2955 3260 11498 2247 401 233 116 3285 2002-03 3278 3516 11913 2247 375 271 151 3339 2003-04 4048 3135 12706 2324 361 240 140 3364 2004-05 4957 3171 14040 2523 420 260 136 3755 2005-06 5496 4164 15377 2451 436 291 105 3683 2006-07 5293 4676 14583 2515 340 230 72 3551 2007-08 8581 6004 17823 2685 380 380 160 4090 2008-09 9285 8378 19598 2400 200 150 100 3005 2009-10 11117 10113 22589 2300 300 210 100 3134 2010-11 12184 12149 25492 2253 435 365 105 3817 Ln(Yt)=� +� T � 5.69 5.75 8.08 7.61 6.36 4.80 5.08 7.96 � 0.15 0.14 0.08 0.01 -0.02 0.03 -0.02 0.01 R 0.98 0.92 0.97 0.40 -0.37 0.35 -0.26 0.31 Ln(Yt)=� +� Ln(CropGDP) � -17.26 -17.02 -4.43 7.02 9.72 0.84 8.67 7.02 � 4.44 4.37 2.41 0.13 -0.66 0.79 -0.67 0.19 R 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.22 -0.33 0.27 -0.33 0.21 ExpGR 13.95 14.40 8.28 0.60 0.86 10.80 0.29 2.44 TRGR 15.96 14.82 8.18 0.78 -2.35 3.45 -1.73 0.93 AvAA eGR 15.23 14.53 8.48 0.57 9.26 14.77 2.11 2.38 CV(%) 118 106 85 989 336 329 2176 542 Projo . Method MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR PGR 13.95 14.40 8.18 0.57 -2.35 3.45 -1.73 0.93 Projo ected P2011-12 13884 13898 27577 2266 425 378 103 3852 P2012-13 15821 15900 29832 2279 415 391 101 3888 P2013-14 18028 18190 32272 2291 405 404 100 3924 P2014-15 20543 20809 34911 2304 396 418 98 3960 P2015-16 23408 23806 37766 2318 386 432 96 3997 P2016-17 26674 27234 40854 2331 377 447 95 4034 Annual GR 2000-01 5.9 -4.0 4.6 -1.4 54.1 -48.1 -46.0 -6.9 2001-02 -2.1 13.3 3.2 5.9 0.5 87.9 13.7 9.8 2002-03 10.9 7.9 3.6 0.0 -6.5 16.3 30.2 1.6 2003-04 23.5 -10.8 6.7 3.4 -3.7 -11.4 -7.3 0.7 2004-05 22.4 1.1 10.5 8.6 16.3 8.3 -2.9 11.6 2005-06 10.9 31.3 9.5 -2.9 3.8 11.9 -22.8 -1.9 2006-07 -3.7 12.3 -5.2 2.6 -22.0 -21.0 -31.4 -3.6 2007-08 62.1 28.4 22.2 6.8 11.8 65.2 122.2 15.2 2008-09 8.2 39.5 10.0 -10.6 -47.4 -60.5 -37.5 -26.5 2009-10 19.7 20.7 15.3 -4.2 50.0 40.0 0.0 4.3 2010-11 9.6 20.1 12.9 -2.0 45.0 73.8 5.0 21.8 Plan Period 13.9 14.4 8.2 0.6 -2.4 3.4 -1.7 0.9 Items Credit Disbursd Credit Recovered Credit Oustnding Urea TSP MOP Gypsum Fertilizer Annexes 103 Table A 4.6: Past Trends (2001-2010) and Projections of Key Performance Indicators for 2011-2016 (Seeds distributed in '000 metric ton, and Crops GDP at constant prices in Billion Taka) Items Aus Seed Aman Seed Boro Seed Paddy Seeds Wheat Seed Potato Seed Oil Seed Total Seeds 2000-01 22 45 76 143 27 63 29 262 2001-02 21 46 101 169 24 70 29 291 2002-03 30 59 82 171 22 64 28 285 2003-04 35 51 124 209 22 73 27 332 2004-05 46 73 151 269 24 76 30 399 2005-06 47 71 128 246 22 87 32 388 2006-07 48 91 148 287 28 83 68 466 2007-08 48 136 161 345 30 100 70 545 2008-09 48 138 115 301 34 105 66 506 2009-10 49 139 118 306 39 110 75 530 2010-11 5 140 120 265 40 120 84 509 Ln(Yt)=�+�T � 3.70 1.82 4.00 4.04 2.30 3.20 1.29 4.50 � -0.01 0.13 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.13 0.07 R -0.06 0.96 0.56 0.87 0.81 0.96 0.90 0.95 Ln(Yt)=�+�Ln(CropGDP) � 11.38 -17.68 -0.30 -5.61 -6.81 -6.60 -18.91 -6.39 � -1.36 3.78 0.87 1.90 1.74 1.89 3.89 2.12 R -0.23 0.93 0.42 0.76 0.90 0.97 0.92 0.89 ExpGR -14.82 11.33 4.55 6.16 4.03 6.43 10.57 6.63 TRGR -1.28 13.82 3.90 7.47 5.30 6.44 13.36 7.77 AveGR -2.70 10.01 6.70 5.27 12.95 6.54 16.58 8.78 CV(%) -1292 240 347 311 228 129 205 129 Proj. Method MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR Derived PGR -14.82 10.01 3.90 5.27 4.03 6.43 10.57 6.30 Projected P2011-12 42 153 123 322 41 117 83 563 P2012-13 36 168 127 339 43 125 92 598 P2013-14 30 185 132 357 44 133 101 635 P2014-15 26 203 138 375 46 141 112 675 P2015-16 22 224 143 395 48 150 124 718 P2016-17 19 246 148 416 50 160 137 763 Annual GR 2000-01 -32.7 -27.6 1.9 -16.0 96.2 2.2 37.1 23.0 2001-02 -4.5 2.6 33.2 17.8 -9.0 10.6 -2.4 11.1 2002-03 42.9 27.2 -19.2 1.3 -7.4 -7.9 -2.8 -2.1 2003-04 16.7 -14.2 51.3 22.7 0.0 13.8 -2.5 16.4 2004-05 31.4 44.0 21.5 28.6 5.8 4.0 12.6 20.3 2005-06 2.2 -1.9 -14.9 -8.5 -5.5 14.5 5.9 -2.8 2006-07 2.1 28.0 15.1 16.4 25.9 -4.9 112.1 20.1 2007-08 0.0 49.2 8.8 20.2 7.1 20.9 2.6 17.0 2008-09 0.0 1.2 -28.3 -12.7 13.2 5.0 -5.7 -7.1 2009-10 2.1 0.7 2.6 1.7 14.9 4.9 13.5 4.8 2010-11 -89.8 0.9 1.7 -13.3 1.3 8.9 12.0 -4.1 Plan Period -14.8 10.0 3.9 5.3 4.0 6.4 10.6 6.3 2000-01 22 45 76 143 27 63 29 262 2001-02 21 46 101 169 24 70 29 291 2002-03 30 59 82 171 22 64 28 285 2003-04 35 51 124 209 22 73 27 332 2004-05 46 73 151 269 24 76 30 399 2005-06 47 71 128 246 22 87 32 388 2006-07 48 91 148 287 28 83 68 466 2007-08 48 136 161 345 30 100 70 545 2008-09 48 138 115 301 34 105 66 506 2009-10 49 139 118 306 39 110 75 530 2010-11 5 140 120 265 40 120 84 509 Ln(Yt)=� +� T � 3.70 1.82 4.00 4.04 2.30 3.20 1.29 4.50 � -0.01 0.13 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.13 0.07 R -0.06 0.96 0.56 0.87 0.81 0.96 0.90 0.95 Ln(Yt)=� +� Ln(CropGDP) � 11.38 -17.68 -0.30 -5.61 -6.81 -6.60 -18.91 -6.39 � -1.36 3.78 0.87 1.90 1.74 1.89 3.89 2.12 R -0.23 0.93 0.42 0.76 0.90 0.97 0.92 0.89 ExpGR -14.82 11.33 4.55 6.16 4.03 6.43 10.57 6.63 TRGR -1.28 13.82 3.90 7.47 5.30 6.44 13.36 7.77 AvAA eGR -2.70 10.01 6.70 5.27 12.95 6.54 16.58 8.78 CV(%) -1292 240 347 311 228 129 205 129 Projo . Method MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR MinGR Derived PGR -14.82 10.01 3.90 5.27 4.03 6.43 10.57 6.30 Projo ected P2011-12 42 153 123 322 41 117 83 563 P2012-13 36 168 127 339 43 125 92 598 P2013-14 30 185 132 357 44 133 101 635 P2014-15 26 203 138 375 46 141 112 675 P2015-16 22 224 143 395 48 150 124 718 P2016-17 19 246 148 416 50 160 137 763 Annual GR 2000-01 -32.7 -27.6 1.9 -16.0 96.2 2.2 37.1 23.0 2001-02 -4.5 2.6 33.2 17.8 -9.0 10.6 -2.4 11.1 2002-03 42.9 27.2 -19.2 1.3 -7.4 -7.9 -2.8 -2.1 2003-04 16.7 -14.2 51.3 22.7 0.0 13.8 -2.5 16.4 2004-05 31.4 44.0 21.5 28.6 5.8 4.0 12.6 20.3 2005-06 2.2 -1.9 -14.9 -8.5 -5.5 14.5 5.9 -2.8 2006-07 2.1 28.0 15.1 16.4 25.9 -4.9 112.1 20.1 2007-08 0.0 49.2 8.8 20.2 7.1 20.9 2.6 17.0 2008-09 0.0 1.2 -28.3 -12.7 13.2 5.0 -5.7 -7.1 2009-10 2.1 0.7 2.6 1.7 14.9 4.9 13.5 4.8 2010-11 -89.8 0.9 1.7 -13.3 1.3 8.9 12.0 -4.1 Plan Period -14.8 10.0 3.9 5.3 4.0 6.4 10.6 6.3 Items Aus Seed Aman Seed Boro Seed Paddy Seeds Wheat Seed Potato Seed Oil Seed Total Seeds Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 104 Table A 4.7: Projections of KPIs given in the Agriculture Ministry Budget Framework 2012-13 Medium Term Targets Indicators Unit Of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1.Innovation of technologies & improved varieties of crops Number 79 79 98 60 62 61 65 64 65 2. Expansion of soil sample testing facilities Percentage of soil sample facilities - 10 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Lakh hectares arable land covered by minor irrigation 7.03 7.49 7.46 7.98 8.15 8.68 9.24 10.01 10.56 3. Expansion of minor irrigation facilities on arable land % of arable land covered by minor irrigation 13.42 14.33 14.12 15.12 15.25 16.04 16.94 18.15 18.96 4. Production of crops a) Rice M.M.Ton 34.30 33.54 34.50 34.75 35 35.4 35.45 35.5 35.55 b) Wheat M.M.Ton 1.05 0.972 0.85 0.975 0.95 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.09 c) Pulse M.M.Ton 0.741 0.716 0.700 0.774 0.712 0.734 0.744 0.755 0.764 d) Oil seeds M.M.Ton 0.90 0.84 0.78 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 5. Production of cash crops a) Jute Lakh bale 80.00 84.00 51.70 79.88 52.7 53.5 54 54 55 b) Cotton ‘000 bale 94 80 120 110 250 390 530 670 740 c)Sugarcane Lakh M. Ton 75 75 80 75 82 84 86 88 90 d) Potato M.M.Ton 8.36 8.33 10.00 8.33 9.25 8.6 8.8 9.0 9.2 e) Spices M.M.Ton 2.353 2.571 2.220 2.64 2.25 2.28 2.26 2.28 2.3 f) Maize M.M.Ton 1.64 1.018 1.070 1.075 1.08 1.085 1.09 1.095 1.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1.Innovation of technologies & improved varieties of crops Number 79 79 98 60 62 61 65 64 65 2. Expansion of soil sample testing facilities Percentage of soil sample facilities - 10 10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Lakh hectares arable land covered by minor irrigation 7.03 7.49 7.46 7.98 8.15 8.68 9.24 10.01 10.56 3. Expansion of minor irrigation facilities on arable land % of arable land covered by minor irrigation 13.42 14.33 14.12 15.12 15.25 16.04 16.94 18.15 18.96 4. Production of crops a) Rice M.M.Ton 34.30 33.54 34.50 34.75 35 35.4 35.45 35.5 35.55 b) Wheat M.M.Ton 1.05 0.972 0.85 0.975 0.95 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.09 c) Pulse M.M.Ton 0.741 0.716 0.700 0.774 0.712 0.734 0.744 0.755 0.764 d) Oil seeds M.M.Ton 0.90 0.84 0.78 0.94 0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 5. Production of cash crops a) Jute Lakh bale 80.00 84.00 51.70 79.88 52.7 53.5 54 54 55 b) Cotton ‘000 bale 94 80 120 110 250 390 530 670 740 c)Sugarcane Lakh M. Ton 75 75 80 75 82 84 86 88 90 d) Potato M.M.Ton 8.36 8.33 10.00 8.33 9.25 8.6 8.8 9.0 9.2 e) Spices M.M.Ton 2.353 2.571 2.220 2.64 2.25 2.28 2.26 2.28 2.3 f) Maize M.M.Ton 1.64 1.018 1.070 1.075 1.08 1.085 1.09 1.095 1.1 Medium Term TargetsIndicators Unit Of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Annexes 105 Contd. Annex-5 Ministry Level Medium Term Strategy Major Strategic Objectives Relevant Policy Documents (National and Ministry/Divisi on level) Implementing Departments/ Agencies Desirable Actions 1. Create enabling environment for agricultural development  Vision 2021  Perspective Plan (2010-2021)  Sixth Five Year Plan (2011 2015)  Citizens charter  All Acts, Policies, Rules and Regulations of the Ministry of Agriculture  Fiscal regime and other government support for agriculture  Secretariat and all Departments /Agencies of the MOA  Review, develop and harmonize various agriculture policies;  Review, develop and harmonize legal and regulatory framework;  Advocate fiscal, monetary and other incentives for agriculture;  Advocate appropriate trade and tariff policies consistent with WTO regime  Strengthen private-private partnership in agriculture,  Mainstream poverty reduction and gender issues in agriculture;  Augment public investment in agricultural R&D for accelerating technological progress in agriculture;  Improve access to information and use of ICT for agriculture development;  Strengthen linkages among research institutions, extension services and their commercial applications by the farmers, NGOs and local government bodies;  Strengthen client-orientation by decentralizing program development to the upazila level is a priority; 2. Enhance production and productivity of crops  Vision 2021  Perspective Plan (2010-2021)  Sixth Five Year Plan (2011 2015)  Citizens charter  National Agriculture Policy  New Agricultural Extension Policy  National Integrated Pest Management Policy  Secretariat  Bangladesh Rice Research Institute  Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture  Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute  Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council  Bangladesh Jute Research Institute  Enhance adaptive research and development activities and effective research-extension linkages for agriculture development  Review and strengthen agricultural extension system and services;  Increase coverage of cultivable land under High yielding varieties and Hybrid;  Raise cropping intensity by spread of short duration and Hybrid multiple cropping;  Enhance rice production and yields through a breeding strategy focusing on grain quality, shorter maturity and hybrid and/or super rice;  Pursue balanced development of cereal and other crops;  Reduction of pre-harvest and post-harvest crop losses;  Targeted food security programmes; Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 106 Contd. Major Strategic Objectives Relevant Policy Documents (National and Ministry/Divisi on level) Implementing Departments/ Agencies Desirable Actions  The National Seed Policy of Bangladesh  Small scale Irrigation Policy  Policy for the Innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety crops and technologies  Policy for the determination of irrigation charge rate  National Jute Policy  Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute  Cotton Development Board  Department of Agricultural Extension  Bangladesh Applied Nutrition and Human Resources Development Board  Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation  Seeds Certification Agency  Agricultural Information Service  Barendra Multipurpose Development Authority  Crop-specific development programs  Increasing awareness about food value and nutrition through publications, meetings and workshops  Strengthen monitoring and Evaluation system 3. Enhance accessibility of affordable inputs and credit to farmers  Sixth Five Year Plan (2011 2015)  Citizens charter  National Agriculture Policy,  New Agricultural Extension Policy,  The National Seed Policy of Bangladesh ,  Secretariat  Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation  Barendra Multipurpose Development Authority Department of Agricultural Extension  Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute  Supply adequate quantity of quality inputs at affordable prices;  Enhance production of quality seeds of different crops in both public and private sectors and strengthen seed monitoring and evaluation activities  Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully level seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence  Ensure supply of quality fertilizers and pesticides at reasonable prices;  Ensure access to agriculture credits at affordable interest rates Annexes 107 Contd. Major Strategic Objectives Relevant Policy Documents (National and Ministry/Divisi on level) Implementing Departments/ Agencies Desirable Actions  Small scale Irrigation Policy  Policy for the Innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety crops and technologies  Policy for the determination of irrigation charge rate  Bangladesh Rice Research Institute  Bangladesh Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute  Seed Certification Agency  Bangladesh Jute Research Institute  Cotton Development Board  Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute  Expansion of minor irrigation coverage by encouraging optimal use of surface water  Increasing the area of arable land by reducing water logging and sub-mergence  Procurement of irrigation machinery and increasing its availability 5. Promote market access and product development for crops  Sixth Five Year Plan (2011 2015)  Citizens charter  National Agriculture Policy  New Agricultural Extension Policy  Secretariat  Department of Agriculture Marketing  Agricultural Information Services  Provide market information;  Promote market development by strengthening cold storage facilities, transportation system and supply chains for crops;  Announcement of appropriate procurement prices for food grains  Development and maintenance of market infrastructure  Providing technological support and technical assistance to agricultural entrepreneurs 4. Enhance land productivity and promote sustainable land use and environmental conservation  Sixth Five Year Plan (2011 2015)  Citizens charter  National Agriculture Policy  New Agricultural Extension Policy  Policy for the Innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety crops and technologies  Secretariat  Soil Resource Development Institute  Bangladesh Agriculture Research Institute  Department of Agricultural Extension  Agricultural Information Services  Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture  Efficient management of water resources;  Appropriate land-use policy and regulation to arrest agricultural land diversion;  Promote mechanized farming;  Promote agriculture in coastal areas and hilly terrains;  Application of contemporary science and technology to tackle environmental degradation, soil erosion, climate change etc.  Identification and classification of soil and land resources through soil survey  Extension of soil test facilities to Upazila and Union level  Popularize the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer among the farmers Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 108 Major Strategic Objectives Relevant Policy Documents (National and Ministry/Divisi on level) Implementing Departments/ Agencies Desirable Actions  The National Seed Policy of Bangladesh  Small scale Irrigation Policy  Policy for the Innovation of climate resilience and short duration variety crops and technologies  Policy for the determination of irrigation charge rate  Co-ordination with relevant government department and private sector to expand market reach for agricultural commodities  Exploit potential for diversification into higher value crops for domestic and external markets;  Improve marketing linkages and information networking;  Commercialize agriculture production by encouraging forward linkages with agro-based industries Annexes Annex-6 Annual Business Plan for Projects (Department/ Agency wise Medium Term costing of Development Projects)23 Ongoing Projects A6.1.1 Secretariat A6.1.2 Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) A6.1.3 Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation (BADC) A6.1.4 Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) A6.1.5 Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) A6.1.6 Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC) A6.1.7 Department of Agricultural Marketing (DAM) A6.1.8 Seed Certification Agency (SCA) A6.1.9 Soil Resource Development Institute (SRDI) A6.1.10 Agricultural Information Services (AIS) A6.1.11 Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute (BSRI) A6.1.12 Barend Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA) A6.1.13 Bangladesh Jute Research Institute (BJRI) A6.1.14 Cotton Development Board (CDB) A6.1.15 Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA) Listed expected Projects A6.2.1 Secretariat A6.2.2 Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) 109 23 1. In the MTSBP, total development allocations for the Ministry of Agriculture is categorized into two parts, (i) Ongoing projects, (ii) Expected projects. Expected Projects are also categorized into two categories: 1) Listed expected Projects 2) Priority area wise expected projects. The cost estimates have been made based on the ADP provision of 2012-13. Actual ADP provision in the subsequent years may differ from what has been provisioned in this document. Given that the MTSBP is a living document and likely to undergo revision in the third year, any change/or actual allocation will be reflected in the revised version. 2. Most of the ongoing projects are scheduled to be completed by FY2014-15 (Annex A6.1.1-A6.1.15).The sizable amount of unspent development resources in the MTSBP is kept reserved for FY 2015-16 and FY 2016-17 to implement listed and priority area wise expected projects. 3. Allocations for listed expected projects (Annex A6.2.1-A6.2.11) are those projects that are included in the green page under ADP 2012-13. 4. In addition, based on the priority areas of future agricultural development, project areas have been identified and listed under different implementing agencies in the priority area wise expected Projects. The priority areas are considered to be linked with the Sixth Five Year Plan objectives. Some block allocations are also shown in the table for priority areas (Annex A6.3.1-A6.3.6). Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan A6.2.3 Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation (BADC) A6.2.4 Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) A6.2.5 Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) A6.2.6 Department of Agricultural Marketing (DAM) A6.2.7 Seed Certification Agency (SCA) A6.2.8 Barend Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA) A6.2.9 Bangladesh Jute Research Institute (BJRI) A6.2.10 Cotton Development Board (CDB) A6.2.11 Bangladesh Applied Nutrition and Human Resource Development Board (BIRTAN) Priority area wise expected Projects A6.3.1 Research A6.3.2 Input Management A6.3.3 Technology dissemination and mechanization A6.3.4 Agricultural diversification and increased crop production A6.3.5 Agriculture marketing and commercial farming A6.3.6 Institutional human resource development 110 Annexes 111 A 6 .1 .1 : M in is tr y o f A g ri cu lt u re ( S e cr e ta ri a t) O n g o in g P ro je ct s2 4 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tiv ity Pr oj ec t (I A PP ) Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 6 11 85 6. 00 59 5. 27  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s (T o im pr ov e pr od uc tiv ity th ro ug h pr od uc tio n an d su pp ly o f qu al ity s ee d & im pr ov ed a gr il. eq ui pm en ts t o ta rg et g ro up s)  D ev el op m en t of ne w c ro ps  A do pt io n of n ew va ri et ie s an d pr od uc tio n pa ck ag es b y th e fa rm er s  H om es te ad pr od uc tio n in cr ea se  W at er u se ef fic ie nc y in cr ea se d an d ra in w at er u se in cr ea se d  Pr od uc tio n of Q ua lit y se ed a nd B re ed in g m at er ia l. H ig h G oB , ID A 42 64 .0 0 35 00 .0 0 25 00 .0 0 99 6. 73 0. 00 A gr ic ul tu ra l Se ct or Pr og ra m m e Su pp or t, Ph as e II : (A SP SI I/ A EC ) (2 nd R ev is ed ) (S ee d W in g Pa rt ) O ct ob er /0 6 D ec em be r/ 12 ) 78 7. 00 67 9. 38  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s (i ) Im pr ov ed l iv in g st an da rd s of p oo r,  FF S w it h an I C M ap pr oa ch es ta bl is he d an d de ve lo pe d in 3 35 U pa zi la s, w it h a ge og ra ph ic al f oc us on t he N or th , N or th W es t, B ar is al , an d N oa kh al i re gi on s, bu t m ai nt ai ni ng a na tio nw id e pr es en ce H ig h D A N ID A 40 .0 0 67 .6 2 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 24 D ur in g M id t er m r ev ie w , an y ch an ge /o r ac tu al a llo ca ti on w ill b e re fle ct ed i n th e re vi se d do cu m en t. A t th e sa m e ti m e, s lo w pr og re ss in g on g oi ng P ro je ct s w ill b e re vi se d or r es tr uc tu re d ac co rd in gl y. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 112 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er h ou se ho ld th ro ug h en ha nc ed , in te gr at ed a nd su st ai na bl e ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc tiv ity . (i i) I m pr ov ed de m an d dr iv en , in te gr at ed a nd de ce nt ra liz ed ex te ns io n sy st em de ve lo pe d to su pp or t po or m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er h ou se ho ld . (i ii) E nh an ce d ca pa ci ty o f th e co nc er ne d ag en ci es o f M O A  FF S de ve lo pe d in to cl ub s an d th en fa rm er as so ci at io ns a re pr ov id ed s up po rt fo r m ar ke ti ng , ag ri bu si ne ss a nd m ic ro e nt er pr is e de ve lo pm en t  Si gn ifi ca nt ly in cr ea se d nu m be r of F Ts d ev el op ed  A n in cr ea se d em ph as is o n lin ka ge s be tw ee n ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc tio n, f oo d us e an d nu tr it io n. H ig h D A N ID A N at io na l A gr ic ul ti ur al Te ch no lo gy Pr oj ec t, Ph as e 1 (2 nd R ev is ed ) PC U co m po ne nt 01 J ul y, 2 00 7 to 31 D ec em be r, 20 13 47 16 .0 0 14 12 .3 5  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts a nd c re di t to f ar m er s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s (T he d ev el op m en t ob je ct iv e of t he ph as e I of t he N AT P is t o im pr ov e ef fe ct iv en es s of th e na ti on al ag ri cu lt ur al te ch no lo gy s ys te m in B an gl ad es h. ) 1. H ig h pr io ri ty , pl ur al is ti c, pa rt ic ip at or y an d de m an d le d ag ri cu lt ur al re se ar ch . 2. D ec en tr al iz ed A gr ic ul tu ra l Ex te ns io n A pp ro ac h. 3. Pr om ot in g fa rm er m ar ke t lin ka ge th ro ug h de ve lo pm en t of su pp ly c ha in s 4. A gr ee d re fo rm s fo r th e A gr ic ul tu ra l Ex te ns io n an d R es ea rc h Sy st em H ig h G oB , ID A , IF A D 13 12 .0 0 19 91 .6 5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 To ta l of M oA 17 35 9. 00 26 87 .0 0 56 16 .0 0 55 59 .2 7 25 00 .0 0 99 6. 73 0. 00 Annexes 113 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. I nt eg ra te d A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tiv ity Pr oj ec t (I A PP ) (a gr ic ul tu re Ex te ns io n Pa rt ) Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 6 10 99 1. 00 73 9. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le in pu ts an d cr ed it to fa rm er s (i m pr ov e pr od uc tiv ity t hr ou gh pr od uc tio n an d su pp ly o f qu al ity se ed & im pr ov ed ag ric ul tu ra l eq ui pm en ts t o ta rg et g ro up s) 14 I m pr ov ed c ro p va ri et ie s, 2, 00 00 0 fa rm er s ad op ti on ,U ne m pl oy m en t re du ce d 10 % . H ig h W or ld B an k, G A FS P G oB 31 02 .0 0 25 00 .0 0 25 00 .0 0 21 50 .0 0 0. 00 2. G re at er R an gp ur A gr ic ul tu ra l an d R ur al D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t* Ju ly /0 6 Ju ne /1 3 69 46 .0 0 60 04 .6 5  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le in pu ts an d cr ed it to fa rm er s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s (T o co m ba t ch ro no lo gi ca lly la nd le ss , m ar gi na l an d sm al l f ar m er s to im pr ov e th ei r liv in g st an da rd de ve lo pm en t of so ci oe co no m ic co nd iti on in g re at er R an gp ur a re a) Im pr ov ed I rr ig at io n, m ar ke ti ng & C om m un ic at io n fa ci lit y U se o f ag ri cu lt ur al Eq ui pm en ts D is se m in at ed im pr ov e te ch no lo gy H ig h ID B + G oB 87 2. 00 69 .3 5 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 A 6 .1 .2 : D e p a rt m e n t o f A g ri cu lt u re E x te n si o n ( D A E ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 114 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 3. A gr ic ul tu re Se ct or Pr og ra m m e Su pp or t Ph as e II (D A E C om po ne nt ) O ct ob er /0 6 D ec em be r/ 12 ) 11 07 9. 00 96 48 .8 8  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le in pu ts an d cr ed it to fa rm er s (I m pr ov ed d em an d dr iv en , in te gr at ed an d de ce nt ra liz ed ex te ns io n sy st em s de ve lo pe d to su pp or t po or , m ar gi na l a nd s m al l fa rm er h ou se ho ld ) * 11 47 0 FF S * no . of f ar m er c lu bs re ce iv ed g ra nt s, tr ai ni ng , su pp or t in po st S ID R a nd p ar ti ci pa te d in s tu dy t ou rs * 16 24 F ar m er Tr ai ne rs d ev el op ed * In cr ea se d Li nk ag e be tw ee n ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc tio n, f oo d us e an d nu tr it io n * A pp ro pr ia te ag ri cu lt ur al te ch no lo gi es f or sm al l, po or a nd m ar gi na l fa rm er s * C ap ac ity o f M O A ag en ci es i m pr ov ed t o pr ov id e qu al ity as su ra nc e an d co nt ro l H ig h D A N ID A 10 41 .0 0 38 9. 12 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4. Em er ge nc y 20 07 C yc lo ne R ec ov er y an d R es to ra ti on Pr oj ec t (E C R R P) R ec ov er y of A gr ic ul tu re Se ct or ( C ro p) an d Im pr ov em en t Pr og ra m m e* A ug us t/ 08 Ju ne /1 3 92 94 .4 7 56 01 .3 0  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it to f ar m er s (I m pr ov e liv el ih oo d an d ho us eh ol d di et an d in cr ea se f oo d pr od uc tio n th ro ug h im pr ov ed s ee ds , ba la nc ed f er til iz er w ith in te ns iv e te ch ni ca l a ss is ta nc e an d pr od uc tio n m an ag em en t.) 1. I m pr ov ed H or ti cu lt ur e 2. Im pr ov ed s ee ds 3. B al an ce F er ti liz er s 4. D is tr ib ut ed 5 0 Po w er T ill er 5. D is tr ib ut ed 2 5 Po w er T hr es he r 6. D is tr ib ut ed U SG A pp lic at or a nd o th er s A gr o pr oc es si ng eq ui pm en t 7. Sm al l s ca le ir ri ga ti on s tr uc tu re 8. C ap ac ity B ui ld in g H ig h ID A 12 00 .0 0 24 93 .1 7 Annexes 115 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 5. C on st ru ct io n of R ub be r D am s in Sm al l M ed iu m R iv er s fo r In cr ea si ng o f Fo od Pr od uc tio n (D A E pa rt )* Ju ly /0 9 Ju ne /1 4) 14 32 9. 00 10 03 8. 90  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it to f ar m er s * Ef fic ie nt u til iz at io n of su rf ac e w at er in A gr ic ul tu re b y th e fa rm er s * In cr ea se c ro p pr od uc tio n in d am ar ea * M ax im um u ti liz at io n of s ur fa ce w at er th ro ug h R ub be r da m s * Ex pa nd t he ir ri ga ti on l an d * In cr ea se t he pr od uc tio n of B or o, T A m an , R ob i & o th er cr op s H ig h G oB 31 74 .0 0 11 16 .1 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6. E st ab lis hm en t of K ri sh ib id In st itu tio n, B an gl ad es h C om pl ex * M ar ch /1 0 Ju ne /1 3 76 32 .0 0 20 46 .2 8  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t (E st ab lis he d KI B co m pl ex w hi ch en ric he d sc ie nt ifi c ac hi ev em en t an d di ff us ed k no w le dg e to a gr ic ul tu re st ak eh ol de rs ) K IB c om pl ex co ns tr uc te d w it h pu bl ic , se m i pu bl ic an d pr iv at e fu nc ti on al ca te go ri es . En su re d de ve lo pm en t of a gr il. Ed uc at io n, r es ea rc h an d ex te ns io n. Es ta bl is he d lin ke d in fo rm at io na l ne tw or k H ig h G oB 50 20 .0 0 56 5. 72 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 7. I nt eg ra te d Pe st M an ag em en t Pr oj ec t (P ha se I I) Ju ly /1 0 Ju ne /1 3) 21 88 .5 2 13 88 .5 2  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t * En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s * To a ss is t in ac hi ev in g, f oo d se lf su ff ic ie nc y in Ba ng la de sh w ith ou t af fe ct in g en vi ro nm en t * To in cr ea se sm al lh ol de rs f ar m *3 95 2 N os . of F FS , *9 88 00 f ar m er s tr ai ne d, a nd g iv en ex po su re t o IP M ac ti vi ti es . * 25 00 N os . of I PM cl ub a ss is te d * 54 0 N os . of B io lo gi ca l co nt ro l an d O rg an ic f ar m in g de m o. s et u p * 20 0 de pa rt m en ta l an d fa rm er t ra in er s de ve lo pe d H ig h G oB 80 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 116 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 ou tp ut a nd in co m e on a n en vi ro nm en ta lly su st ai na bl e ba si s * To p op ul ar iz e Bi ol og ic al P es t C on tr ol t ec hn ol og y in v eg et ab le s pr od uc tio n fo r en su rin g pe st ic id e fr ee v eg et ab le s * To e nh an ce O rg an ic fa rm in g *3 0 w or ks ho ps a nd 27 0 IP M f ar m er s co ng re ss o rg an iz ed 8. I nt eg ra te d Q ua lit y H or tic ul tu re D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (2 nd Ph as e) .* Ju ly /1 0 D ec em be r/ 13 78 62 .6 0 24 68 .5 4  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s (T o in cr ea se c ap ac ity of H or tic ul tu re ce nt er s fo r qu al ity pl an tin g m at er ia l pr od uc tio n th ro ug h co lle ct io n, e va lu at io n an d co ns er va tio n of ge rm pl as m o f ho rt ic ul tu ra l c ro ps fr om lo ca l & ab ro ad an d to c re at e w id e ge ne tic b as e fo r fu tu re c ro p im pr ov em en t pr og ra m ) Im pr ov ed H or ti cu lt ur e, 1 36 50 fa rm er s an d 60 0 O ff ic e st af f tr ai ne d, Es ta bl is he d ge rm pl as m o f ho rt ic ul tu ra l cr op s In cr ea se d Li nk ag e be tw ee n ho rt ic ul tu ra l pr od uc tio n, f oo d us e an d nu tr it io n M ed iu m G oB 17 00 .0 0 15 00 .0 0 21 94 .0 6 0. 00 0. 00 9. S ec on d C ro p D iv er si fic at io n Pr oj ec t* * Ju ly /1 0 Ju ne /1 6) 34 97 8. 00 94 6. 81  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s (T o re du ce p ov er ty by im pr ov in g fa rm er s in co m e an d In cr ea se d ar ea t o 50 00 0 ha o f H Y V, 52 30 00 f ar m er s tr ai ne d, g en de r de ve lo pm en t, co ns tr uc ti on o f 6 H D T C a nd 1 1 D D of fic e R en ov at io n of 16 D D o ff ic e H ig h A D B + G oB 25 47 .0 0 40 00 .0 0 60 00 .0 0 12 00 0. 00 94 84 .1 9 Annexes 117 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 10 . M in im iz in g R ic e Y ie ld G ap Pr oj ec t Ja nu ar y/ 11 D ec em be r/ 13 19 95 .0 0 10 33 .0 4  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it to f ar m er s * To m in im iz e ric e yi el d ga p th ro ug h tr ai ni ng a nd de m on st ra tio n on m od er n cu lti va tio n pa ck ag e * To p ro vi de g oo d qu al ity s ee ds o f m od er n ric e va rit ie s * To m ai nt ai n so il he al th f er til ity th ro ug h so il te st ba se d fe rt ili ze r us e 30 00 F FS e st ab lis he d, 30 00 f ar m er s, 3 75 SA A O a nd 1 50 O ff ic er s t ra in ed , 90 00 s ee d be d 3 00 0 T. A m an & 6 00 0 B or o de m o es ta bl is he d, 30 00 F ie ld d ay s, 1 53 w or ks ho ps a rr an ge d, 50 t ho us an d po st er & 70 00 t ra in in g m an ua l di st ri bu te d, Q ua lit y se ed p ro cu re d an d di st ri bu te d H ig h G oB 67 0. 00 29 1. 96 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 11 . Fa rm er 's Tr an in g at t he U pa zi la L ev el fo r Tr an sf er o f Te ch no lo gy 2n d ph as e Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 4) 98 85 .0 0 42 9. 14  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s * To in st itu tio na liz e fa rm er 's t ra in in g th ro ug h de ve lo pm en t of ph ys ic al f ac ili tie s * To c ha ng e vi ew a nd id ea o f Fa rm er 's th ro ug h sy st em at ic pr ac tic al a nd o n fa rm t ra in in g * To in cr ea se t ec hn ic al sk ill s of e xt en si on w or ke rs * C on st ru ct 1 06 up az ila F ar m er 's Tr ai ni ng c en tr e (U FT C ) * Sk ill ed a nd kn ow le dg ea bl e fa rm er s *I m pl em en t m od er n cu lt ur al p ra ct ic es * In cr ea se y ie ld p er un it ar ea * R ed uc e co st o f pr od uc tio n H ig h G oB 25 00 .0 0 69 55 .8 6 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 so ci oe co no m ic co nd iti on o f th e ru ra l pe op le a nd le as t ec on om ic al ly de ve lo pe d ar ea ) Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 118 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 12 . U p gr ad at io n of A ri ha za r H or tic ul tu re ce nt re t o AT I Pr oj ec t Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 4) 17 78 .0 0 14 .5 6  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t (T o de ve lo p hu m an re so ur ce s th ro ug h pr ov id in g m od er n ag ric ul tu ra l ed uc at io n an d tr ai ni ng t o ga in s el f su ff ic ie nc y in f oo d) Es ta bl is he d AT I at A ra ih az ar . St ar ti ng D ip lo m a ag ri . Ed uc at io n, t ra in in g on Ex te ns io n se rv ic es an d ne w A gr ic ul tu ra l Te ch no lo gi es . M ed iu m G oB 80 0. 00 96 3. 44 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 13 . Tu be r C ro ps D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (D A E pa rt )* Ju ly /1 0 Ju ne /1 3 83 7. 00 37 6. 36  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s (T o ex te nd /c ul tiv at e tu be r va rie tie s of sw ee t po ta to , ar oi d & y am in d is tr es se d & S ID R a ff ec te d ar ea s an d cr ea te m ar ke t an d m ar ke rt in g fa ci lit ie s) . Te ch no lo gy D is se m in at io n Tr ai ni ng ( fa rm er s, SA A O & o ff ic er ). C re at e M ar ke t N at io na l w or ks ho p pu bl ic ity & p ub lic at io n m ot iv at io n to ur M ed iu m G oB 40 0. 00 30 .0 0 30 .6 4 0. 00 0. 00 14 . M uj ib na ga r In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (D A E Pa rt ) Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 6) 38 29 .0 0 46 5. 64  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s (T o in cr ea se 1 0% ov er al l a gr ic ul tu ra l pr od uc tio n a nd t o im pr ov e nu tr iti on al st at us a t le as t 10 % of t he p eo pl e of t he pr oj ec t ar ea ) 10 92 5 no . Te ch no lo gy D is se m in at io n Pr og ra m m e, 2 09 0 no . Te ch no lo gy v ill ag e, Tr ai ni ng ( 10 26 ba tc hf ar m er s, 1 25 ba tc h SA A O & of fic er ), 2 85 F ar m er s R al ly & 8 55 0. F ie ld da y, 5 N at io na l w or ks ho p, 8 7 ba tc he s m ot iv at io n to ur , 92 K ri sh iM el a H ig h G oB 35 0. 00 10 00 .0 0 12 00 .0 0 81 3. 36 0. 00 Annexes 119 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 15 . N at io na l A gr ic ul tu ra l Te ch no lo gy Pr oj ec t, P ha se 1 (2 nd R ev is ed ) D A E co m po ne nt 01 J ul y, 2 00 7 3 1 D ec em be r, 20 13 15 64 2. 00 93 46 .2 2  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s (S up po rt G oB 's st ra te gy t o im pr ov e na tio na l a gr ic ul tu ra l pr od uc tiv ity a nd fa rm in co m e, w ith a pa rt ic ul ar f oc us o n sm al l a nd m ar gi na l fa rm er s) N um be r of U pa zi lla ex te ns io n pl an s in 12 0 U pa zi lla a nd 12 00 U ni on l ev el m ic ro pl an p re pa re d, ap pr ov ed a nd im pl em en te d * 18 00 0 C IG s or ga ni ae d an d su pp or te d on a co nt in uo us b as is , 20 % o f th e C IG s ar e fo rm ed w it h w om en m em be rs H ig h ID A , IF A D 53 08 .0 0 98 7. 78 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 16 . Fa rm M ac hi ne ry Te ch no lo gy D ev el op m en t an d D is se m in at io n (D A E Pa rt )* Ju ly /1 0 D ec em be r/ 13 ) 32 0. 00 18 6. 07  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  (T o in cr ea se ag ric ul tu ra l pr od uc tio n by di ss em in at in g ap pr op ria te f ar m M ac hi ne ry te ch no lo gy a t fa rm le ve l a nd t he re by re du ci ng c os t of pr od uc tio n& m in im iz in g cr op lo ss ) * no . of fa rm m ac hi ne ry a t fa rm er le ve l *I nc re as ed u se o f fa rm m ac hi ne ry H ig h G oB 10 5. 00 28 .9 3 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 17 . St re ng th e ni ng M us hr oo m , D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t Ja nu ar y/ 09 Ju ne /1 3) 54 50 .6 3 42 20 .6 5  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t (I m pr ov in g di ve rs ifi ed a nd su st ai na bl e te ch no lo gi es o f di ff er en t w or ld po pu la r M us hr oo m s an d di ss em in at e th em t o th e gr ow er s 6 la b, 4 d or m at or ie s, 6 cu lt ur e ho us es , 20 se m ip ac ca c ul tu re ho us es , 1 an im al ho us e et c. es ta bl is he d 57 00 0 fa rm er s 42 0 TO T, 9 0 en tr ep re ne ur an d 13 20 o ff ic er tr ai ne d 10 0 w or ld po pu la r m us hr oo m va ri et ie s ge rm pl as m in tr od uc ed H ig h JD C F + G oB 75 2. 00 47 7. 98 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 120 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 18 . In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu re Ex te ns io n A pp ro ac h fo r Po ve rt y R ed uc ti on a nd Fo od s ec ur it ie s Pr oj ec t (I A PR FP ) Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 4) 15 00 .0 0 59 9. 66  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s * To in cr ea se f ar m pr od uc tio n an d to cr ea te e m pl oy m en t op po rt un iti es f or t he pe op le li vi ng in t he re m ot e ru ra l a re as by in tr od uc in g m ul tid is ci pl in ar y ag ric ul tu ra l pr od uc tio n ap pr oa ch * To d ev el op a s el f re lia nt m od el o f im pr ov ed li ve lih oo d & s us ta in ab le f oo d an d nu tr iti on al ly se cu re d vi lla ge * To u pg ra de t he kn ow le dg e, s ki lls an d ov er al l c ap ac ity of f ar m er s gr ou p, D A E of fic ia ls , st ak eh ol de rs a nd ot he r of fic ia ls C ro p yi el d in cr ea se s 20 3 0% e m pl oy m en t an d in co m e ge ne ra ti on op po rt un it ie s cr ea te d 2 3 fo ld s H ig h JD C F + G oB 60 0. 00 30 0. 34 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 19 . Pi ro jp ur , G op al ga nj & B ag er hu t In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t D A E pa rt Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 6) 54 50 .6 3 0. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s Sk ill ed m an po w er , R eh ab ili ta ti on o f D A E of fic es , En su re d Ve hi cl es , En su re d us e of A gr ic ul tu ra l eq ui pm en ts , In du ce d us e of m ac hi ne ry & eq ui pm en ts , D ev el op ed IC T f ac ili ti es H ig h G oB 10 4. 33 82 7. 63 20 00 25 18 .6 7 0. 00 fo r re du ci ng m al nu tr iti on , cr ea tin g em pl oy m en t op po rt un ity & ge ne ra tin g th ei r in co m e ul tim at el y al le vi at in g po ve rt y) Annexes 121 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 20 . Ea st er n In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t 2n d ph as e Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 5 20 36 .6 6 0. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s (T o re du ce p ov er ty by i m pr ov in g fa rm er s in co m e an d so ci oe co no m ic co nd it io n of t he ru ra l pe op le o f ea st er n ar ea ) 36 00 0 D em on st ra ti on , 45 00 0 fa rm er s, 4 50 0 SA A O & 1 35 0 of fic er s tr ai ne d 27 00 0 fie ld da y, 1 80 m ot iv at io na l to ur & 1 71 a gr il. F ai r M ed iu m G oB 10 4. 33 79 9. 20 11 33 .1 3 21 .S tr en gt he ni ng Ph yt os an it ar y C ap ac ity i n B an gl ad ee sh Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 7 14 54 0. 40 0. 00  To p ro te ct a nd C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l de ve lo pm en t (A gr ic ul tu re f ro m en tr y, in tr od uc tio n, es ta bl is hm en t an d sp re ad o f de st ru ct iv e pe st w ith p ro pe r ad op tio n of I SP M s in co ns on an ce w ith IP PC a nd a gr ee m en t on t he a pp lic at io n of Sa ni ta ry & Ph yt os an ita ry M ea su re o n in te rn at io na l t ra de ) Es ta bl is he d 6 ne w Q ua ra nt in e la b, C on st ru ct io n of 6 of fic e bu ild in g, 7 p os t en tr y qu ar an ti ne ce nt er , up gr ad at io n of 10 e xi st in g la b C ap ac ity b ui ld in g 54 56 q ua ra nt in e pe rs on ne l & e xp or te r im po rt er H ig h G oB 10 4. 34 65 54 .8 7 45 42 .1 7 12 08 .6 7 21 30 .3 5 (T o en su re f oo d se cu rit y in P iro jp ur , G op al go nj , Ba ge rh at an d in cr ea si ng c ro p pr od uc tio n ar ea b y br in gi ng f al lo w la nd un de r cu lti va tio n) . Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 122 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 22 . Fo od S ec ur ity th ro ug h en ha nc ed A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tio n, D iv er si fie d so ur ce s of In co m e, V al ue A dd it io n an d M ar ke ti ng i n B an gl ad es h (M ym en si ng h/ Sh er pu r) (F SM SP ) Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 5) 26 04 .0 0 15 7. 77  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s (T o es ta bl is h vi lla ge Ba se d O rg an iz at io n (V BO ) in o rd er t o m ob ili ze f ar m er 's gr ou p fo r be st ut ili za tio n of co m m un ity r ev ol vi ng fu nd a s a m od el so ci al u ni t to e ns ur e fo od s ec ur ity * To d ev el op ap pr op ria te m ar ke t lin ka ge a m on g th e pr od uc er a nd co ns um er * To e nh an ce in co m e ge ne ra tin g ac tiv iti es th ro ug h in cr ea si ng fa rm er 's k no w le dg e in v al ue a dd iti on , pr oc es si ng a nd ap pr op ria te p os t ha rv es t ha nd in g of ag ric ul tu ra l co m m od iti es ) *I nc re as ed 1 5 20 % yi el d of d iff er en t cr op * Es ta bl is he d 24 te ch no lo gy v ill ag e to co ns er ve b io di ve rs ity * 48 V B O d ev el op ed as a s us ta in ab le , se lf re lia nt , pe rf ec t gr ou p *E st ab lis hm en t of 39 6 FF S & o rg an iz ed no . of t ra in in g an d m ot iv at io na l to ur H ig h It al y, F A O G oB 12 71 .0 0 60 0. 00 57 5. 23 0. 00 0. 00 To ta l of D A E * LG E D P a rt o f th e P ro je ct s sh o w n a s D A E 's P a rt 17 11 68 .9 1 55 71 1. 99 32 52 5. 00 32 65 1. 45 20 17 5. 23 18 69 0. 70 11 61 4. 54 Annexes 123 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 A sh ug an j Po la sh A gr o Ir ri ga tio n Pr oj ec t (4 th Ph as e) 1 st R ev is ed 1 Ja nu ar y 20 09 Ju ne 2 01 4 26 82 .3 8 22 85 .5 1 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce a cc es si bi lit y of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To pr ov id e ir ri ga tio n fa ci lit ie s to 2 22 67 he ct re s of l an d) To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 96 25 0 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r. M ed iu m G O B 20 0. 00 19 6. 87 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 G re at er D ha ka Ir ri ga tio n A re a D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t( 2n d Ph as e) ( 1s t R ev is ed ) 2* Ju ly 2 01 0 D ec em be r 20 14 10 75 1. 72 65 09 .3 3 1. E xp an si on o f ir ri ga te d ar ea th ro ug h in st al la ti on of L LP a nd D T W . 2. R ee xc av at io n of kh al n al a 3. C on st ru ct io n of hy dr ol ic s tr uc tu re s. To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 49 21 3 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r th ro ug h 19 68 5 he ct re s of ir rig at ed la nd . H ig h G O B 23 00 .0 0 15 00 .0 0 44 2. 39 0. 00 0. 00 G re at er K hu ln a Je ss or e K us ht ia In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (2 nd Ph as e) 1 st re vi se d 3 Ju ly 2 00 9 Ju ne 2 01 4 25 81 .0 0 20 15 .7 6 1. E xp an si on o f ir ri ga te d ar ea th ro ug h in st al la ti on of L LP a nd D T W . 2. R ee xc av at io n of kh al n al a 3. C on st ru ct io n of hy dr ol ic s tr uc tu re s. 4. P ro vi di ng t ra in in g to f ar m er s To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 13 61 0 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r th ro ug h 54 44 .0 0 he ct re s of ir rig at ed la nd . H ig h G O B 32 7. 00 23 8. 24 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 G re at er Fa ri dp ur Ir ri ga tio n A re a D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (1 st re vi se d) 4* Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 5 94 62 .6 6 47 44 .5 5 1. E xp an si on o f ir ri ga te d ar ea th ro ug h in st al la ti on of L LP a nd D T W . 2. R ee xc av at io n of kh al n al a (T o pr ov id e irr ig at io n fa ci lit ie s to 3 33 6 he ct re s of l an d) To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 33 66 4. 50 m et ric t on s of f oo d gr ai n pe r ye ar . H ig h G O B 25 00 .0 0 15 00 .0 0 71 8. 11 0. 00 0. 00 A 6 .1 .3 : B a n g la d e sh A g ri cu lt u re D e v e lo p m e n t C o rp o ra ti o n ( B A D C ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 124 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 G re at er M ym en si ng h Ta ng ai l In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t( 2n d Ph as e) 5 Ju ly 2 00 9 Ju ne 2 01 4 25 40 .2 3 16 45 .9 3 1. E xp an si on o f ir ri ga te d ar ea th ro ug h in st al la ti on of L LP a nd D T W . 2. R ee xc av at io n of kh al n al a 3. C on st ru ct io n of hy dr ol ic s tr uc tu re s. 4. P ro vi di ng t ra in in g to f ar m er s (T o pr ov id e ir ri ga tio n fa ci lit ie s t o 92 71 he ct ar es o f la nd .) To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 18 92 5 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r. H ig h G O B 34 5. 00 54 9. 30 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Pa bn a N at or e Si ra jg an g In te gr at ed Ir ri ga tio n A re a D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (3 rd Ph as e) * 6* Ja nu ar y 20 11 Ju ne 2 01 4 15 17 4. 00 44 47 .9 9 1. E xp an si on o f ir ri ga te d ar ea th ro ug h in st al la ti on of L LP a nd D T W . 2. R ee xc av at io n of kh al n al a 3. C on st ru ct io n of hy dr ol ic s tr uc tu re s. 4. P ro vi di ng t ra in in g to f ar m er s 5. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 6. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To pr ov id e ir ri ga tio n fa ci lit ie s t o 45 70 4 he ct ar es o f la nd .) To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 11 46 71 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r H ig h G O B 22 00 .0 0 30 00 .0 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 125 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 Pr oj ec t f or En ha nc em en t of A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tio n an d Po ve rt y A lle vi at io n by In tr od uc in g Fo rc e M od e Tu be w el l Ir ri ga tio n Pr oj ec t 7* Ju ly 2 01 0 Ju ne 2 01 4 25 83 .4 3 16 93 .3 0 1. To o pe ra te f or ce m od e tu be w el ls an d ot he r ir ri ga ti on in fr as tr uc tu re s 2. P ro vi di ng t ra in in g to f ar m er s/ ow ne rs /o pe ra to r/ fie ld m an o f ir ri ga ti on eq ui pm en t (T o pr ov id e ir ri ga tio n fa ci lit ie s t o 33 36 he ct ar es o f la nd .) To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 83 40 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r. H ig h G O B 50 0. 00 39 0. 13 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Ex pa ns io n of Ir ri ga tio n th ro ug h U ti liz at io n of Su rf ac e W at er b y D ou bl e Li ft in g (2 nd Ph as e) 8 Ju ly 2 00 9 Ju ne 2 01 4 10 64 9. 90 78 00 .4 7 1. To o pe ra te l an d ba se p um ps a nd flo at in g pu m ps f or us in g su rf ac e w at er of t he p er en ni al ri ve rs /n at ur al w at er bo dy s by a pp ly in g do ub le l ift in g te ch ni qu es . 2. P ro vi di ng t ra in in g to f ar m er s/ ow ne rs /o pe ra to r/ fie ld m an o f ir ri ga ti on eq ui pm en t To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 13 78 12 .5 0 m et ric t on s of f oo d gr ai n pe r ye ar . H ig h G O B 14 00 .0 0 14 49 .4 3 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Pr oj ec t fo r A ct iv at in g In op er ab le D ee p Tu be w el ls o f B A D C f or Ir ri ga tio n* * 9* Ju ly 2 01 0 Ju ne 2 01 5 20 49 8. 00 71 05 .2 3 1. Ex pa nd i rr ig at ed ar ea t hr ou gh in op er ab le 2 c us ec D T W s th ro ug h re ha bi lit at io n an d bu ri ed p ip e sy st em . 2. T o cr ea te s el f em pl oy m en t an d al le vi at e po ve rt y of ow ne rs / m an ag er s/ op er at or s/ fie ld sm an a nd fa rm er s by up gr ad in g th ei r To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 16 75 80 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r. M ed iu m G O B 35 00 .0 0 57 76 .3 5 41 16 .4 2 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 126 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 Su rv ey a nd M on it or in g Pr oj ec t fo r D ev el op m en t of M in or Ir ri ga tio n Pr oj ec t (3 rd Ph as e) 10 Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 4 23 97 .5 0 13 63 .1 8 To c ol le ct m in or ir ri ga tio n re la te d da ta , an al yz e th e da ta a nd c on ve rt in to u se fu l in fo rm at io n, in cr ea se t he kn ow le dg e an d pr ov id e te ch ni ca l as si st an ce . Im pl em en ta tio n of t he pr oj ec t w ill c re at e th e pr ov is io n fo r m in or irr ig at io n da ta b an k at na tio na l l ev el w hi ch w ill g iv e te ch ni ca l as si st an ce a nd s up po rt to t he g ov er nm en t. H ig h G O B 70 0. 00 33 4. 32 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 G re at er B og ra R an gp ur D in aj pu r In te gr at ed A re a D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t 11 Ju ly 2 00 9 Ju ne 2 01 4 25 03 .6 8 16 54 .3 7 1. E xp an si on o f ir ri ga te d ar ea th ro ug h in st al la ti on of L LP a nd D T W . 2. R ee xc av at io n of kh al n al a 3. C on st ru ct io n of hy dr ol ic s tr uc tu re s. 4. P ro vi di ng t ra in in g to f ar m er s 5. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 14 82 0 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r th ro ug h irr ig at io n up to 5 92 8. 00 h ec tr es . H ig h G O B 34 3. 00 50 6. 31 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 sk ill s th ro ug h tr ai ni ng . (T o pr ov id e ir ri ga tio n fa ci lit ie s to 4 78 80 he ct re s of l an d by 14 25 i no pe ra bl e de ep t ub ew el l re ha bi lit at io n) Annexes 127 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 In no va tiv e U se o f Su rf ac e w at er P ro je ct (2 nd P ha se ) 12 Ju ly 2 00 9 Ju ne 2 01 4 25 22 .0 0 20 86 .5 9 1. E xp an si on o f ir ri ga te d ar ea th ro ug h in st al la ti on of L LP a nd D T W . 2. R ee xc av at io n of kh al n al a 3. C on st ru ct io n of hy dr ol ic s tr uc tu re s. 4. P ro vi di ng t ra in in g to f ar m er s 5. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 22 87 5 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r th ro ug h irr ig at io n up to 9 15 0. 00 h ec tr es . H ig h G O B 18 0. 00 25 5. 41 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 D ev el op m en t an d M ul ti pl ic at io n of A gr ic ul tu ra l Se ed s Pr oj ec t (2 nd P ha se )* 13 Ju ly 2 01 0 Ju ne 2 01 3 55 1. 00 43 2. 73 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To pr ov id e ir ri ga tio n fa ci lit ie s to 2 22 67 he ct re s of l an d) To p ro du ce 9 ( ni ne ) la kh p ot at o pl an tle ts fr om t w o tis su e cu ltu re la bs . H ig h G O B 10 3. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Es ta bl is hm en t of In te gr at ed Se ed C ol d St or ag e C om pl ex a t K ur ig ra m Pr oj ec t* 1 st re vi se d 14 Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 4 36 04 .2 5 29 8. 22 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. To p ro vi de de hu m id ifi ed st or ag e fa ci lit y fo r pu ls e oi l, ve ge ta bl es , ri ce a nd m ai ze s ee d to t he pr iv at e se ed pr od uc er s. C on st ru ct io n of o ne de hu m id ifi ed s to re ha vi ng 10 00 m t. ca pa ci ty t o pr ov id e st or ag e fa ci lit y fo r pu ls e oi l, ve ge ta bl es , ric e an d m ai ze s ee d to th e pr iv at e se ed pr od uc er s. H ig h G O B 12 00 .0 0 21 06 .0 3 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 128 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 C hi tt ag on g H ill T ra ct s In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (3 rd Ph as e) 15 Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 4 14 51 .5 0 60 0. 00 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. Ex pa ns io n of ir rig at io n to 6 50 0 ac re s of la nd th ro ug h 50 c on tr ol st ru ct ur es a nd 3 00 no s. o f po w er p um ps . M ed iu m G O B 42 1. 00 43 0. 50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 En ha nc in g Q ua lit y Se ed Su pp ly Pr oj ec t (B A D C P ar t) (1 st Ph as e) ** 16 Ja nu ar y 20 11 Ju ne 2 01 4 18 64 5. 60 18 07 .3 4 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To ge ne ti ca lly i m pr ov e th e se ed o f m aj or cr op s lik e ri ce w he at m ai ze , pu ls e, oi l et c) Pr od uc tio n of 3 44 50 m .t . ce rt ifi ed & tr ut hf ul ly la be le d se ed s fr om f ou nd at io n se ed . H ig h G O B + ID B 38 00 .0 0 30 00 .0 0 60 00 .0 0 40 38 .2 6 0. 00 Pr iv at e Se ct or S ee d D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (2 nd Ph as e) 17 Ja nu ar y 20 11 D ec em be r 20 13 18 16 .0 0 10 18 .8 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( Fo rm s el f re lie nt s ee d pr od uc in g fa rm er s gr ou p/ se ed co m pa ni es i n pr iv at e se ct or w ho w ill p ro du ce , pr oc es s, p re se rv e & m ar ke t se ed .) Pr iv at e se ct or s ee d en te rp ris e de ve lo pm en t, h um an re so ur ce d ev el op m en t, se ed m ar ke tin g & pr od uc tio n of q ua lit y se ed . H ig h G O B 60 0. 00 19 7. 20 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 129 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 Im pr ov em en t an d Q ua lit y Se ed Pr od uc tio n of R ic e, W he at , an d M ai ze (2 nd P ha se ) (B A D C P ar t) 18 M ar ch 2 01 0 D ec em be r 20 13 18 67 1. 00 13 64 3. 04 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To pr od uc e 14 00 00 m et ri c to ns o f qu al ity c er ea l se ed s (p ad dy , w he at a nd m ai ze ). To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 43 .2 7 la kh m et ric t on s pa dd y, a nd w he at w ho se m ar ke t pr ic e m ay b e tk . 10 81 75 0 la kh . H ig h G O B 28 00 .0 0 22 27 .9 6 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 M uj ib na go r In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (B A D C P ar t) 19 Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 6 14 93 1. 00 35 94 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To b ri ng ad di ti on al 2 46 75 he ct or s of l an d un de r ir ri ga ti on .) To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 61 68 7 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in . H ig h G O B 26 50 .0 0 20 00 .0 0 25 00 .0 0 41 87 .0 0 0. 00 Tu be r C ro ps D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (B A D C P ar t) * 20 Ju ly 2 01 0 Ju ne 2 01 4 38 55 3. 00 93 95 .1 2 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To in cr ea se q ua lit y se ed p ot at o pr od uc tio n, pr es er va tio n an d di st ri bu ti on t hr ou gh ou t th e co un tr y. ) Po ta to p ro du ct io n w ill be in cr ea se d an d hu ge am ou nt o f fo re ig n cu rr en cy w ill b e sa ve d. M ed iu m G O B 25 00 .0 0 12 00 0. 00 14 65 7. 88 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 130 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 Pu ls e an d oi l Se ed P ro je ct (2 nd Ph as e) 21 Ju ly 2 00 9 Ju ne 2 01 4 16 76 4. 11 69 07 .3 2 1. E nh an ce p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To b ui ld up p ul se a nd o il se ed s to ck o f fo un da tio n st an da rd 34 35 m et ri c to ns T LS 1 04 45 m et ri c to ns .) By u si ng t he se s ee ds 55 27 50 m et ric t on s of pu ls e an d oi l c ro ps w ill be p ro du ce d. H ig h G O B 20 00 .0 0 78 56 .7 9 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 C on st ru ct io n of R ub be r D am s in Sm al l an d M ed iu m R iv er s fo r In cr ea si ng o f Fo od Pr od uc tio n Pr oj ec t( B A D C Pa rt ) 22 Ju ly 2 00 9 Ju ne 2 01 6 57 31 .9 0 18 26 .1 7 1. E nh an ce p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce a cc es si bi lit y of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it to f ar m er s. (T o ex pa nd t he ir ri ga ti on l an d by en su ri ng t he m ax im um u ti liz at io n of w at er b y pa rt ic ip at or y w at er m an ag em en t an d m od er n te ch no lo gy .) To p ro du ce a dd iti on al 35 80 2 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er y ea r. H ig h G O B 40 2. 00 80 5. 31 26 98 .4 2 0. 00 0. 00 Es ta bl is hm en t of S ee d M ul ti pl ic at io n Fa rm i n th e So ut he rn C oa st al R eg io n (B ar is al a nd Pa tu ak ha li) Pr oj ec t* * 23 Ja nu ar y 20 12 Ju ne 2 01 4 24 49 7. 00 30 4. 79 1. E nh an ce p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To p ro du ce 11 50 0 m et ri c to ns qu al ity s ee d of r ic e, w he at , m ai ze , po ta to , pu ls e an d oi l se ed f ro m br ee de r se ed s. ) By u si ng o ne t hi rd o f th e se ed s ab ou t 9. 25 8 m ill io n to ns a dd iti on al fo od w ill b e pr od uc ed . H ig h G O B 50 00 .0 0 30 00 .0 0 60 00 .0 0 80 00 .0 0 21 92 .2 1 Annexes 131 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 In te gr at ed Q ua lit y H or tic ul tu re D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t( B A D C Pa rt )* 24 Ju ly 2 01 0 D ec em be r 20 13 36 35 .0 0 21 31 .3 9 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. To d ev el op H ig h yi el di ng va ri et ie s, p ac ka ge of p ro du ct io n an d po st h ar ve st te ch no lo gi es o f ho rt ic ul tu ra l cr op s. To p ro du ce a bo ut 13 75 00 0 m et ric t on s of f ru its a nd v eg et ab le s, 8. 7 co re s se ed lin gs , 93 la kh s ap lin gs o f flo w er s an d pl an ts . H ig h G O B 10 00 .0 0 50 3. 61 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Pi ro jp ur , G op al ga nj B ag er hu t In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t B A D C pa rt 25 Ju ly 2 01 2 Ju ne 2 01 7 13 96 7. 87 12 8. 93 To p ro du ce m or e fo od g ra in i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea op ti m um u ti liz at io n or r es ou rc e by ap pl yi ng m od er n an d lo ca l ap pr op ri at e te ch no lo gy s uc h re ex ca va tio n of k ha l na la i ns ta lla ti on o f LL Ps a nd co ns tr uc ti on o f ir ri ga ti on c ha nn el , hy dr ol ic s tr uc tu re . To e st ab lis h 20 0 M T ca pa ci ty s ee d pr oc es si ng , pr es er va tio n an d di st ri bu ti on c en te r. To b rin g ad di tio na l 22 00 h ec te rs o f cu lti va bl e la nd u nd er irr ig at io n af te r co m pl et io n of t he pr oj ec t by w hi ch 55 00 0 m et ric t on s of ad di tio na l f oo d gr ai n w ill b e pr od uc ed . H ig h G O B 0. 00 37 43 .2 9 25 00 .0 0 50 00 .0 0 25 95 .6 5 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 132 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 Im pr ov in g su rf ac e w at er ir ri ga ti on i n C oa st al a re as an d sy lh et di vi si on i n B an gl ad es h 26 Ju ly 2 01 2 Ju ne 2 01 4 46 8. 00 0. 00 1. To i m pr ov e su rf ac e w at er i rr ig at io n in C oa st al a re as a nd sy lh et d iv is io n in B an gl ad es h 2. D ev el op m en t of a n in ve st m en t fr am ew or k fo r im pr ov in g s ur fa ce w at er i rr ig at io n 3. C ap ac ity de ve lo pm en t fo r G ov t D ep t. a nd fa rm er s co m m un it ie s. It is e xp ec te d th at t he pr oj ec t w ill c on tr ib ut e to p ro du ct iv e, eq ui ta bl e an d su st ai na bl e w at er re so ur ce m an ag em en t an d im pr ov e fo od se cu rit y in r ur al a re as . H ig h G oB + FA O 29 5. 60 17 2. 40 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tiv ity Pr oj ec t (I A PP ) B A D C P ar t 27 Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 6 10 37 6. 00 19 28 .2 6 1. E nh an ce pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. ( To im pr ov e pr od uc tiv ity th ro ug h pr od uc tio n an d su pp ly o f qu al ity s ee d & im pr ov ed a gr il. eq ui pm en ts t o ta rg et g ro up s)  D ev el op m en t of n ew cr op s  A do pt io n of n ew va rie tie s an d pr od uc tio n pa ck ag es by t he f ar m er s  H om es te ad pr od uc tio n in cr ea se  W at er u se e ff ic ie nc y in cr ea se d an d ra in w at er u se in cr ea se d  Pr od uc tio n of Q ua lit y se ed a nd B re ed in g m at er ia l. H ig h G oB + ID A 18 58 .0 0 15 00 .0 0 40 00 .0 0 10 89 .7 4 0. 00 25 80 09 .7 3 8 7 3 6 8 .3 2 3 9 1 2 4 .6 0 5 5 2 3 9 .4 5 4 8 1 3 3 .2 2 2 3 3 4 1 .0 1 4 7 8 7 .8 6 Annexes 133 A 6 .1 .4 : B a n g la d e sh A g ri cu lt u ra l R e se a rc h I n st it u te ( B A R I) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. A gr ic ul tu ra l Se ct or Pr og ra m m e Su pp or t, Ph as e II : (A SP SI I/ A EC ) (2 nd R ev is ed ) B A R I Pa rt O ct ob er /0 6 D ec em be r/ 12 30 3. 00 27 8. 68  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s (i ) Im pr ov ed l iv in g st an da rd s of p oo r, m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er h ou se ho ld th ro ug h en ha nc ed , in te gr at ed a nd su st ai na bl e ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc tiv ity . (i i) I m pr ov ed d em an d dr iv en , in te gr at ed an d de ce nt ra liz ed ex te ns io n sy st em de ve lo pe d to su pp or t po or , m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er h ou se ho ld . (i ii) E nh an ce d ca pa ci ty o f th e co nc er ne d ag en ci es of M O A  FF S w it h an I C M ap pr oa ch e st ab lis he d an d de ve lo pe d in 33 5 U pa zi la s, w it h a ge og ra ph ic al f oc us on t he N or th , N or th W es t, B ar is al , an d N oa kh al i re gi on s, bu t m ai nt ai ni ng a na tio nw id e pr es en ce  FF S de ve lo pe d in to cl ub s an d th en fa rm er a ss oc ia ti on s ar e pr ov id ed s up po rt fo r m ar ke ti ng , ag ri bu si ne ss a nd m ic ro e nt er pr is e de ve lo pm en t  Si gn ifi ca nt ly in cr ea se d nu m be r of FT s de ve lo pe d  A n in cr ea se d em ph as is o n lin ka ge s be tw ee n ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc tio n, f oo d us e an d nu tr it io n. H ig h D A N ID A 16 .0 0 8. 32 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 134 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 2. St re ng th en in g of I nf or m at io n & C om m un ic at io n Te ch no lo gy (I C T ) an d B io m et ri ca l fa ci lit ie s at B A R I (1 st R ev is ed ) Ju ly 2 00 9 Ju ne 2 01 3 80 0. 00 51 4. 24 i. C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t To s tr en gt he n th e ca pa ci ty o f In fo rm at io n an d co m m un ic at io n Te ch no lo gy ( IC T ) an d B io m et ri ca l fa ci lit ie s of B A R I. ii. T o de ve lo p in te rn al , na ti on al , re gi on al a nd g lo ba l lin ka ge s to i m pr ov e re se ar ch a nd in fo rm at io n sh ar in g. iii . To f ac ili ta te cr ea tio n of en vi ro nm en t fo r th e es ta bl is hm en t of e g ov er na nc e at th e in st it ut e. iv . To d ev el op s ta te of th e ar t M IS , W eb a nd B io m et ri ca l la bo ra to ry f ac ili ti es . v. T o de ve lo p hu m an re so ur ce s in t he fie ld o f IC T a nd im pr ov e IC T se rv ic es o f th e in st it ut e an d to es ta bl is h a di vi si on at B A R I. T he b en ef it o f th is pr oj ec t w ill b e in th re e di st in ct a re as of R es ea rc h, Te ch no lo gy Im pl em en ta tio n/ Tr an sf er a nd M an ag em en t Sy st em H ig h JD C F 28 3. 00 2. 76 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 135 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 3. Im pr ov em en t an d Q ua lit y Se ed Pr od uc tio n of R ic e, W he at an d M ai ze (B A R I Pa rt ) M ar ch 2 01 0 D ec em be r 20 13 37 32 .0 0 24 92 .0 8  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it to f ar m er s To d ev el op h ig h yi el di ng s up er io r va ri et ie s of w he at an d hy br id m ai ze .  To d ev el op im pr ov ed te ch no lo gi es o f pr od uc tio n, pr oc es si ng a nd pr es er va tio n fo r ha rn es si ng p ot en ti al yi el d of i m pr ov ed va ri et ie s of w he at an d m ai ze .  To p ro du ce su ff ic ie nt q ua nt it ie s of b re ed er s ee d/ fo un da ti on s ee d an d in br ed l in es o f w he at a nd m ai ze .  To t ra ns fe r de ve lo pe d te ch no lo gi es t o th e en d us er s th ro ug h tr ai ni ng , de m on st ra ti on s, fie ld d ay s, pu bl ic at io ns a nd el ec tr on ic m ed ia .  To i m pr ov e th e kn ow le dg e an d sk ill of t he s ci en ti st s th ro ug h tr ai ni ng , vi si ts a nd h ig he r ed uc at io n.  Su st ai ne d va ri et al im pr ov em en t fo r he at , dr ou gh t, di se as e & q ua lit y  Im pr ov ed c ro p m an ag em en t pr ac ti ce s fo r hi gh yi el d  Ju di ci ou s m an ag em en t of fe rt ili ze rs , w at er a nd m ai ze e tc . H ig h 74 2. 00 49 7. 92 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 136 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 4. In te gr at ed Q ua lit y H or tic ul tu re D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (P ha se I I) (B A R I Pa rt )* Ju ly '1 0 D ec em be r 13 54 81 .0 0 18 98 .9 1  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s C ol le ct io n ev al ua ti on a nd co ns er va ti on o f ge rm pl as m o f ho rt ic ul tu ra l cr op s fr om l oc al a nd ab ro ad a nd t o cr ea te w id e ge ne tic ba se f or f ut ur e cr op im pr ov em en t pr og ra m .  to d ev el op h ig h yi el di ng v ar ie ti es , pa ck ag e of pr od uc tio n an d po st h ar ve st te ch no lo gi es o f ho rt ic ul tu ra l cr op s in cl ud in g ad ap ta ti on of m od er n ho rt ic ul tu ra l te ch no lo gi es .  to i nc re as e th e ca pa ci ty o f H or ti cu lt ur al C en te rs f or q ua lit y pl an ti ng m at er ia l pr od uc tio n  to b ui ld u p th e ca pa ci ty o f ho rt ic ul tu ra l st ak eh ol de rs a nd  T he p ro je ct a ct iv it ie s w ill g en er at e im pr ov ed v ar ie tie s an d te ch no lo gi es au gm en ti ng pr od uc tio n, pr es er va tio n an d ut ili za ti on o f ho rt ic ul tu ra l cr op s.  Q ua lit y se ed pr od uc tio n of ve ge ta bl es i n th e co un tr y w hi ch w ill in cr ea se v eg et ab le pr od uc tio n an d re du ce s ee d im po rt .  In cr ea se d pr od uc tio n of f ru its an d ve ge ta bl es .  In cr ea se d pr od uc tio n of f ru its an d ve ge ta bl es w ill al le vi at e m al nu tr it io n an d pr om ot e ex po rt . M ed iu m 12 00 .0 0 15 00 .0 0 88 2. 09 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 137 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 de ve lo pm en t of sk ill ed m an po w er i n nu rs er y se ct or w it h em ph as iz e to w om en t hr ou gh tr ai ni ng .  to d is se m in at e th e m od er n ho rt ic ul tu ra l te ch no lo gi es a t fie ld le ve l th ro ug h de m on st ra ti on a nd ot he r m ea ns  to p ro vi de t ec hn ic al an d lo gi st ic s up po rt to t he p ro du ce r an d ex po rt er t o re du ce po st h ar ve st l os se s.  to d ev el op pr oc es si ng a nd pr es er va tio n sy st em fo r ho rt ic ul tu ra l pr od uc es a t ho us eh ol d le ve l w it h a vi ew t o re du ce p os t ha rv es t lo ss es a nd e ns ur in g ho us eh ol d le ve l nu tr it io n th ro ug ho ut th e ye ar .  to b ui ld u p su st ai na bl e lin ka ge s am on g fa rm er s, tr ad er s, p ro ce ss or s an d ex po rt er s in or de r to m in im iz e m ar ke ti ng n et w or k al on g w it h im pr ov ed m ar ke tin g in fo rm at io n sy st em of h or ti cu lt ur al pr od uc e Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 138 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7  to i m pr ov e nu tr it io na l st at us , ge ne ra ti on o f w om en e m pl oy m en t op po rt un it ie s fo r po ve rt y al le vi at io n. 5. Fa rm M ac hi ne ry Te ch no lo gy D ev el op m en t an d D is se m in at io n (B A R I Pa rt )* Ju ly /2 01 0 Ju ne /2 01 3 14 62 .0 0 83 0. 26  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s. To i nc re as e cr op pr od uc tio n, a nd re du ce p os t ha rv es t lo ss es a nd pr od uc tio n co st b y us in g B A R I de ve lo pe d fa rm m ac hi ne ry .  To d ev el op aw ar en es s of t he fa rm er s th ro ug h de m on st ra ti on a nd tr ai ni ng a nd m ot iv at e th em t o ad op t fa rm m ac hi ne ry .  To p op ul ar iz e th e B A R I de ve lo pe d fa rm m ac hi ne ry am on g th e fa rm er s th ro ug h su bs id iz ed sa le .  To u ps ca le t he ca pa bi lit ie s of t he lo ca l fa rm m ac hi ne ry m an uf ac tu re rs a nd tr ad er s th ro ug h tr ai ni ng a nd o th er te ch ni ca l su pp or t.  In cr ea se d cr op pr od uc tio n, r ed uc ed po st h ar ve st l os s an d in cr ea se d ti m el in es s of op er at io ns .  R ed uc ed p ro bl em o f la bo ur a nd d ra ft po w er s ho rt ag e  En co ur ag e sm al l fa rm er s to f or m fa rm er s' g ro up /c o op er at iv e fo r ac hi ev in g th e be ne fit s of f ar m m ec ha ni za ti on  C re at e po si ti ve im pa ct o n th e us ef ul ne ss o f fa rm m ec ha ni za ti on am on g fa rm er s. H ig h 55 0. 00 81 .7 4 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 139 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7  To d ev el op kn ow le dg e an d sk ill of t he f ar m er s, op er at or s an d ex te ns io n pe rs on ne l on o pe ra ti on , re pa ir an d m ai nt en an ce o f B A R I de ve lo pe d fa rm m ac hi ne ry . To S tr en gt he n re se ar ch a nd de ve lo pm en t on fa rm m ac hi ne ry , po st ha rv es t pr oc es s en gi ne er in g an d re ne w ab le e ne rg y. 6. Tu be r C ro ps D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (B A R I Pa rt ) * Ju ly 2 01 0 Ju ne 2 01 3 27 52 .0 0 10 95 .1 5  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s.  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd u se a nd en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on .  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s. G er m pl as m co lle ct io n bo th f ro m lo ca l an d ex ot ic so ur ce s in o rd er t o de ve lo p hi gh y ie ld in g, di se as e re si st an t, sa lt a nd d ro ug ht to le ra nt a nd a ls o pr oc es si ng v ar ie tie s.  Su st ai ne d va ri et al im pr ov em en t.  Im pr ov ed m an ag em en t pr ac ti ce s.  Im pr ov ed s oi l an d w at er m an ag em en t.  Im pr ov ed p es t & di se as e m an ag em en t.  Im pr ov ed p os t ha rv es t pr oc es si ng . M ed iu m 12 00 .0 0 30 0. 00 15 6. 85 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 140 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 7. U pg ra di ng o f Pu ls es R es ea rc h Su b st at io n M ad ar ip ur t o R eg io na l Pu ls es R es ea rc h St at io n (R PR S) Ja nu ar y 20 11 Ju ne 2 01 4 18 16 .0 0 73 6. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s.  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s.  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd u se a nd en vi ro nm en t. C on se rv at io n co lle ct io n, id en ti fic at io n, ch ar ac te ri za ti on a nd  In cr ea se a re a an d pr od uc ti on o f pu ls es .  To m ak e av ai la bl e H Y V p ul se s to t he gr ow er s.  Im pr ov e so il he al th by b io lo gi ca l ni tr og en f ix at io n.  M ot iv at e fa rm er s in us in g m od er n te ch no lo gi es . H ig h 80 0. 00 28 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00  Po ta to b re ed er s ee d pr od uc tio n th ro ug h ti ss ue c ul tu re te ch ni qu e in o rd er to r ed uc e im po rt at io n. Pr od uc tio n an d di st ri bu ti on o f sw ee t po ta to a nd ar oi ds b re ed er se ed s.  In fr as tr uc tu re a nd m an po w er de ve lo pm en t.  Im pr ov em en t of se ed p ot at o qu al ity of p ub lic a nd pr iv at e se ct or s an d al so o f fa rm er s se ed s th ro ug h tr ai ni ng , de m on st ra ti on a nd fie ld d ay s. Annexes 141 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 ev al ua ti on o f ge rm pl as m o f pu ls es o f th e so ut he rn r eg io n of B an gl ad es h.  D ev el op m en t of hi gh y ie ld in g va ri et ie s w it h re si st an t to b io tic an d ab io ti c st re ss es .  C on du ct io n of re se ar ch b as ed de m on st ra ti on i n bl oc k an d tr ai ni ng of f ar m er s, N G O an d ex te ns io n pe rs on ne l.  Pr od uc tio n an d di st ri bu ti on o f br ee de r' s se ed a nd tr ut hf ul ly l ab el ed se ed s of i m pr ov ed va ri et ie s of p ul se s.  U pg ra di ng o f Pu ls es R es ea rc h Su b st at io n (P R SS ) to R eg io na l Pu ls es R es ea rc h St at io n (R PR S) w it h in cr ea si ng m an po w er , la nd a re a an d in fr as tr uc tu re . 8. En ha nc in g Q ua lit y Se ed Su pp ly ( 1s t R ev is ed )* Ju ly /2 01 1 Ju ne /2 01 4 58 03 .0 0 22 5. 05  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s.  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s  Su st ai na bl e st re ss to le ra nt v ar ie ti es o f m aj or c ro ps de ve lo pe d. H ig h 22 50 .0 0 20 00 .0 0 13 27 .9 5 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 142 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. To g en et ic al ly im pr ov e th e se ed s of m aj or c ro ps ; To in cr ea se p ro du ct io n of n uc le us , br ee de r an d qu al ity s ee ds o f R ic e, W he at , M ai ze , Tu be r cr op s, P ul se s, O il se ed c ro ps , Ve ge ta bl es , Fr ui ts , Sp ic es e tc ;  To m ul ti pl y an d di st ri bu te Fo un da ti on , C er ti fie d an d Tr ut hf ul ly L ab el ed Se ed s (T LS );  To b ui ld p hy si ca l in fr as tr uc tu re a nd st re ng th en h um an re so ur ce s de ve lo pm en t;  To i m pa rt t ra in in g an d te ch ni ca l ba ck up t o th e pu bl ic a nd p ri va te en tr ep re ne ur s, ex te ns io n se rv ic e pr ov id er s an d fa rm er s fo r qu al ity se ed p ro du ct io n an d ut ili za ti on ;  To s tr en gt he n fa rm ad ap tiv e re se ar ch at f ar m er s' f ie ld le ve l on i m pr ov ed va ri et ie s an d te ch no lo gi es o f di ff er en t cr op s.  B re ed er s ee ds o f B A R I m an da te d cr op s m ad e av ai la bl e.  Fo un da ti on , ce rt ifi ed an d T LS m ul ti pl ie d an d di st ri bu te d.  Y ie ld o f di ff er en t cr op s in cr ea se d co ns id er ab ly d ue t o th e us e of g oo d qu al ity s ee d. Annexes 143 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 9. D ev el op m en t of Sa fe V eg et ab le s Pr od uc tio n Te ch no lo gy U ti liz in g U rb an A gr ic ul tu ra l O rg an ic W as te in t he P er i U rb an A re as * Ja nu ar y 20 11 Ju ne 2 01 3 95 0. 00 39 5. 11  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s To d ev el op l es s gr ee nh ou se g as (G H G ) em itt in g en vi ro nm en t fr ie nd ly s ui ta bl e m et ho ds o f re cy cl in g th e ho us e ho ld , ki tc he n m ar ke t an d ho te l or ga ni c w as te s as or ga ni c fe rt ili ze r.  To e xa m in e th e po te nt ia lit y of lo ca lly a va ila bl e m at er ia ls f or m ak in g or ga ni c fe rt ili ze rs t o pr od uc e sa fe ve ge ta bl es .  To s ta nd ar di ze su st ai na bl e sa fe ve ge ta bl e pr od uc tio n te ch no lo gy f oc us in g go od a gr ic ul tu ra l pr ac ti ce s in p er i ur ba n ar ea s.  To o rg an iz e th e in te re st ed s af e ve ge ta bl e gr ow er s fr om p er i ur ba n ar ea s to t ra ns fe r  Im pr ov ed c ro ps m an ag em en t fo r ve ge ta bl es g ro w er s of p er iu rb an a re as ;  Su st ai ne d us e of m un ic ip al o rg an ic w as te ;  Ef fe ct iv e pr oj ec t m an ag em en t on or ga ni c w as te ;  Tr ai ne d m an po w er ;  D ev el op ed m ar ke t ch ai n of s af e ve ge ta bl e H ig h 37 0. 00 18 4. 89 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 144 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 th e te ch no lo gy th ro ug h de m on st ra ti on , fie ld da y, t ra in in g, w or ks ho p, sy m po si um , bo ok le ts , le af le ts fa ct s he et ;  To d ev el op a n ef fe ct iv e ne tw or k be tw ee n gr ow er s m un ic ip al au th or it ie s an d ho us eh ol ds f or sh ar in g th e w as te . 10 . C on tin ua tio n an d ex pa ns io n of P es ti ci de R es ea rc h in Pe st ic id e A na ly ti ca l La bo ra to ry a t B A R I M ay 2 01 1 Ju ne 1 5 85 9. 00 40 1. 28  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd u se a nd en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on C on ti nu at io n of re se ar ch a nd ex pn si on o f La b fa ci lit ie s;  A cc el er at io n of t he ac cr ed ita tio n pr oc ed ur es ;  D ev el op m en t of pr ot oc ol s of s in gl e an d m ul ti pl e pe st ic id e re si du es ;  D et er m in at io n of PH I fo r di ff er en t pe st ic id es a nd cr op s;  Su st ai na bl e pr ot oc ol fo r di ff er en t gr ou ps of p es ti ci de s w ill b e de ve lo pe d;  Sc en ar io o f pe st ic id e re si du e lo ad i n di ff er en t ag ro ec ol og ic al z on es w ill be k no w n;  A w ar en es s of s af e us e an d ha nd lin g of pe st ic id es f or fa rm er s' , G O , N G O pe rs on ne l an d pr iv at e en tr ep re ne ur s. M ed iu m JD C F 10 6. 00 20 0. 00 15 1. 72 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 145 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7  D et er m in at io n an d do cu m en ta ti on o f pe st ic id e re si du e fr om f ie ld c ol le ct ed sa m pl es o f ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc es ;  D is se m in at io n of ac qu ir ed t ec hn ol og y am on g fa rm er s an d st ak eh ol de rs . 11 . D ev el op m en t an d Ex pa ns io n of R es ea rc h an d R es ea rc h In fr as tr uc tu re of B A R I Ju ly , 20 12 Ju ne , 20 16 16 00 0. 00 0. 00  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd u se a nd en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on (S tr en gt he ni ng o f R eg io na l St at io n, su b st at io n an d st at io n fo r de ve lo pi ng a nd di ss em in at in g ne w va ri et y an d te ch no lo gy )  Im pr ov ed c ro p m an ag em en t re se ar ch ;  Su st ai ne d va ri et al im pr ov em en t;  Im pr ov ed s oi l an d w at er m an ag em en t;  Im pr ov ed i ns ec t, pe st s an d di se as e m an ag em en t Im pr ov ed p os t ha rv es t te ch no lo gy . H ig h G oB 10 00 .0 0 35 00 .0 0 55 00 .0 0 60 00 .0 0 0. 00 12 . M uj ib na ga r In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 6 61 9. 00 15 4. 05  En ha ne ni ng o f R eg io nb ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it to f ar m er s  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd u se a nd en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on  In cr ea se a re a an d pr od uc tio n of ve ge ta bl es , pu ls es , po ta to , oi ls ee ds a nd m ai ze .  To m ak e av ai la bl e se ed s of H Y V f ru it s, ve ge ta bl es , pu ls es , po ta to , oi ls ee ds a nd m ai ze t o th e gr ow er s. H ig h G oB 17 2. 00 15 0. 00 10 0. 00 42 .9 5 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 146 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 To p ro du ce m or e fo od g ra in i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea th ro ug h op tim um ut ili za ti on o f re so ur ce s by ap pl yi ng m od er n an d lo ca l ap pr op ri at e ag ri cu lt ur al te ch no lo gy ;  To b ri ng a dd it io na l 24 67 5 he ct ar es o f cu lt iv ab le l an d un de r ir ri ga ti on af te r co m pl et io n of th e pr oj ec t th ro ug h ex ca va tio n an d re ex ca va ti on o f 25 0 K m . kh al s/ na la s, op ti m um u ti liz at io n of 4 25 n os . of va ri ou s ca pa ci ty l ow lif t pu m ps , 13 0 no s. of f or ce m od e tu be w el ls a nd co ns tr uc ti on o f su rf ac e an d su b su rf ac e bu ri ed p ip e ir ri ga ti on c ha nn el in cl ud in g ot he r ne ce ss ar y hy dr au lic st ru ct ur e by w hi ch 61 68 7 m et ri c to n ad di ti on al f oo d gr ai n w ill b e pr od uc ed ;  To d is se m in at e po te nt ia l te ch no lo gi es f or in cr ea si ng ag ri cu lt ur al  To m ak e av ai la bl e se ed s of H Y V f ru it s, ve ge ta bl es , pu ls es , po ta to , oi ls ee ds a nd m ai ze t o th e gr ow er s.  Im pr ov e so il he al th by b io lo gi ca l ni tr og en f ix at io n.  M ot iv at e fa rm er s in us in g m od er n te ch no lo gi es . Annexes 147 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 pr od uc tio n in o rd er to e ns ur e fo od se cu ri ty ;  To i nc re as e ef fic ie nc y an d ef fe ct iv en es s of A gr ic ul tu ra l Ex te ns io n Sy st em by p ro vi di ng in st it ut io na l su pp or t an d m ob ili ty f ac ili tie s fo r ex te ns io n;  To d ev el op h ig h yi el di ng , in se ct a nd di se as e re si st an t va ri et ie s of ve ge ta bl es , po ta to , fr ui ts , pu ls es , oi ls ee ds a nd m ai ze su it ab le f or M uj ib na ga r ar ea s;  G en er at io n an d va lid at io n of s it e sp ec ifi c cr op pi ng pa tt er ns a nd co m po ne nt te ch no lo gi es ;  To i nc re as e in co m e of t he f ar m er s of th e pr oj ec t ar ea b y pr ov id in g fa ir p ri ce s to t he f ar m er s th ro ug h lin ki ng fa rm s to m ar ke ts an d ex te ns io n of m ar ke ti ng s er vi ce s. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 148 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it to f ar m er s To i nt ro du ce n ew hi gh y ie ld in g sh or t du ra ti on v ar ie ti es o f w he at a nd p ro te in en ri ch ed m ai ze w it h sp ec ifi c ad ap ta ti on to d ro ug ht , bo ro n de fic ie nc y an d ac id so il.  To i nt ro du ce n ew hi gh y ie ld in g sh or t du ra ti on v ar ie ti es o f oi ls ee ds a nd p ul se s w ith s pe ci fic a da pt io n to s al in ity , dr ou gh t, bo ro n de fic ie nc y an d ac id s oi l, ch ar la nd .  To d em on st ra te , va lid at e an d ad ap t ne w t ec hn ol og ie s in th e fa rm er s fie ld w it h pa rt ic ip at io n of fa rm er s, D A E, N G O , pr iv at e or ga ni za ti on et c.  To p ro du ce a nd su pp ly o f br ee de r' s se ed .  To d ev el op m et ho ds fo r re st or at io n of so il he al th a nd m ai nt en an ce o f so il fe rt ili ty .  D ev el op m en t of n ew cr op s  A do pt io n of n ew va ri et ie s an d pr od uc tio n pa ck ag es by t he f ar m er s  H om es te ad pr od uc tio n in cr ea se  W at er u se e ff ic ie nc y in cr ea se d an d ra in w at er u se i nc re as ed  Pr od uc ti on o f Q ua lit y se ed a nd B re ed in g m at er ia l. 13 . In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tiv ity Pr oj ec t (B A R I pa rt ) Ju ly /2 01 1 Ju ne /2 01 6 22 00 .0 0 14 4. 24 M ed iu m G oB I D A 67 3. 00 50 0. 00 50 0. 00 38 2. 76 0. 00 T o ta l B A R I 4 2 7 7 7 .0 0 9 1 6 5 .0 5 9 3 6 2 .0 0 9 2 0 5 .6 3 8 6 1 8 .6 1 6 4 2 5 .7 1 0 .0 0 Annexes 149 A 6 .1 .5 : B a n g la d e sh R ic e R e se a rc h I n st it u te ( B R R I) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P r o je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct C o st ( In La k h T a k a ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. S tr en gt he ni ng of R ic e B re ed er Se ed P ro du ct io n an d M ai nt en an ce o f N uc le us S to ck (1 st R ev is ed )* Ju ly /2 00 7 Ju ne /2 01 3 15 56 .0 0 13 10 .0 0 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r R ic e br ee de r se ed su pp ly i s in cr ea se d an d m ai nt ai n nu cl eu s st oc k H ig h G oB 24 5. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2. S tr en gt he ni ng an d C ap ac ity B ui ld in g of B io te ch no lo gy La bo ra to ry i n B R R I (1 st R ev is ed )* Ju ly /2 00 7 Ju ne /2 01 3 10 15 .2 0 83 0. 17 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r B io te ch no lo gy r es ea rc h ca pa ci ty s tr en gt he ne d M ed iu m G oB 18 2. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. F ar m M ac hi ne ry Te ch no lo gy D ev el op m en t an d D is se m in at io n (B R R I C om po ne nt )* Ju ly /2 01 0 Ju ne /2 01 5 17 08 .9 5 55 5. 01 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r Ex te nd ed e ff ic ti ve ag ri cu lt ur al m ac hi ne ry us e. H ig h G oB 45 0. 00 40 0. 00 30 3. 94 0. 00 0. 00 4. M in im iz in g R ic e Y ie ld G ap Pr oj ec t (B R R I C om po ne nt ) Ja nu ar y/ 20 11 D ec em be r/ 20 13 25 2. 00 12 4. 07 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r R ic e pr od uc tio n is in cr ea se d. H ig h G oB 12 4. 00 24 .0 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 5. B io te ch no lo gy R es ea rc h Fa ci lit ie s D ev el op m en t (B R FD ) at B R R I * M ay /2 01 1 Ju ne /2 01 3 60 8. 50 99 .1 5 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r B io te ch no lo gy r es ea rc h fa ci lit ie s ar e de ve lo pe d H ig h JD C F 50 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 6. E nh an ci ng Q ua lit y Se ed Su pp ly ( B R R I C om po ne nt )* Ju ly / 20 11 Ju ne /2 01 4 60 54 .3 2 57 .6 1 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r R ic e br ee de r se ed su pp ly i s in cr ea se d. H ig h ID B 11 20 .0 0 20 98 .0 0 16 60 .3 5 11 18 .3 6 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 150 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P r o je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct C o st ( In La k h T a k a ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 7. M uj ib na ga r In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ce t (B R R I C om po ne nt ) Ju ly /2 01 1 Ju ne /2 01 6 94 5. 00 14 7. 66 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r Im pr ov em en t of a re a sp ec ifi c te ch no lo gi es an d go od q ua lit y se ed . H ig h G oB 20 0. 00 15 0. 00 25 0. 00 19 7. 34 0. 00 8. I nt eg ra te d A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tiv ity Pr oj ec t (I A PP ) (B R R I pa rt ) Ju ly /2 01 1 Ju ne /2 01 6 20 56 .0 0 19 4. 69 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r St re ss t ol er en t va ri et y im pr ov em en t an d ex pa ns iio n. H ig h G A FS P Tr us t Fu nd 60 6. 00 36 6. 00 50 0. 00 38 9. 31 0. 00 9. P ir oj pu r G op al go nj B ag er ha t In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu re D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (B R R I Pa rt ) Ju ly /2 01 2 Ju ne /2 01 6 69 1. 91 0. 00 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r Im pr ov em en t of a re a sp ec ifi c te cn ol og ie s an d go od q ua lit y se ed . H ig h G oB 0. 00 10 0. 00 17 0. 00 18 0. 00 24 1. 91 10 . D ev el op m en t of R es ea rc h C ap ac ity o f th e B an gl ad es h R ic e R es ea rc h In st itu te Ja nu ar y/ 20 12 D ec em be r/ 20 13 23 66 .0 0 78 3. 85 In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc ti vi ty i n th e cr op s ec to r R es ea rc h fa ci lit ie s an d co ld t ol er en t va ri et y de ve lo pm en t M ed iu m K O IC A 90 0. 00 11 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 1 7 2 5 3 .8 8 4 1 0 2 .2 1 4 3 2 7 .0 0 3 2 4 8 .0 0 2 8 8 4 .2 9 1 8 8 5 .0 1 2 4 1 .9 1 Annexes 151 A 6 .1 .6 : B a n g la d e sh A g ri cu lt u re R e se a rc h C o u n ci l (B A R C ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. N at io na l A gr ic ul tu ra l Te ch no lo gy Pr oj ec t, P ha se 1 (2 nd R ev is ed ) B A R C c om po ne nt 01 J ul y, 20 07 t o 31 D ec em be r, 20 13 18 55 3. 00 78 08 .8 6  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd pr od uc t de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s 1. H ig h pr io ri ty , pl ur al is ti c, pa rt ic ip at or y an d de m an d le d ag ri cu ltu ra l re se ar ch . 2. D ec en tr al iz ed A gr ic ul tu ra l Ex te ns io n A pp ro ac h. 3. P ro m ot in g fa rm er m ar ke t lin ka ge th ro ug h de ve lo pm en t of su pp ly c ha in s. 4. A gr ee d re fo rm s fo r th e A gr ic ul tu ra l Ex te ns io n an d R es ea rc h Sy st em H ig h ID A I FA D G O B 51 55 .0 0 55 89 .1 4 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2. N at io na l A gr ic ul tu ra l Te ch no lo gy Pr oj ec t, P ha se 1 (2 nd R ev is ed ), K G F co m po ne nt ** 01 J ul y, 20 07 t o 31 D ec em be r, 20 13 59 29 .0 0 26 20 .4 8 H ig h ID A I FA D G O B 10 20 .0 0 22 88 .5 2 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. N at io na l A gr ic ul tu ra l Te ch no lo gy Pr oj ec t, P ha se 1 (2 nd R ev is ed ) H or te x co m po ne nt ** 34 58 .0 0 96 5. 12 H ig h ID A I FA D G O B 15 85 .0 0 90 7. 88 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2 7 9 4 0 .0 0 ** K G F an d H or te x is s ho w n in B A R C p ar t. 1 1 3 9 4 .4 6 7 7 6 0 .0 0 8 7 8 5 .5 4 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 01 J ul y, 20 07 t o 31 D ec em be r, 20 13 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 152 A 6 .1 .7 : D e p a rt m e n t o f A g ri cu lt u ra l M a rk e ti n g ( D A M ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. In te gr at ed Q ua lit y H or tic ul tu re D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (P ha se II ) D A M pa rt Ju ly 1 0 D ec em be r 13 24 70 .0 0 37 8. 23  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd pr od uc t de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s To d ev el op pr oc es si ng a nd Pr es er va tio n sy st em f or ho rt ic ul tu ra l lo ss es an d en su ri ng ho us eh ol d le ve l nu tr it io n th ro ug ho ut t he ye ar . T hi s is a s er vi ce or ie nt ed p ro je ct . T he re fo re , it is n ot fe as ib le t o m ea su re di re ct f in an ci al b en ef it . H ow ev er , th e pr oj ec t ou tp ut s ar e: a. Ex pa ns io n of l ow co st p ro ce ss in g te ch no lo gy o f ho rt ic ul tu ra l pr od uc es a t ho m es te ad l ev el am on g 18 00 0 fa rm er s an d m em be r of f ar m er 's f am ily . b. Ex te ns io n of l ow co st p os t ha rv es t ha nd lin g an d m ar ke ti ng p ra ct ic es at p ro du ce r' s le ve l. c. In cr ea se d on f ar m in co m e of t he t ar ge t fa rm er s by t he e nd of t he p ro je ct pe ri od . R ed uc ti on o f pr es en t le ve l of po st h ar ve st l os se s by 5 0% . d. G en er at io n of em pl oy m en t op po rt un ity i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea s pa rt ic ul ar ly f or vi lla ge w om en . e. Pr ot ec tio n fr om di st re ss s al e by M ed iu m G O B 11 00 .0 0 60 0. 00 39 1. 77 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 153 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 ab so rb in g se as on al gl ut t hr ou gh pr oc es si ng a nd pr es er va tio n. f. In cr ea se d su pp ly o f qu al ity h or ti cu lt ur al pr od uc es f or d om es ti c an d in te rn at io na l m ar ke ts . g. A w ar en es s ab ou t th e pr oc es si ng a nd pr es er va tio n of ho rt ic ul tu ra l pr od uc es w ill b e cr ea te d in t he pr oj ec t ar ea s. h. In cr ea se d nu tr iti on al in ta ke o f th e ta rg et gr ou p ho us eh ol ds an d ar ea s. 2. Pe ro jp ur G op al go nj B ag er ha t In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu re D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (D A M pa rt ). Ju ly '1 2 Ju ne 1 7 74 8. 00 0. 00  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s 1) T o in cr ea se in co m e of t he fa rm er s of t he pr oj ec t ar ea b y pr ov id in g fa ir pr ic es t o th e fa rm er s th ro ug h lin ki ng f ar m s to m ar ke ts a nd ex te ns io n of m ar ke tin g se rv ic es . 1. Im pr ov em en t of m ar ke ti ng s ys te m . 2. C on tr ib ut io n to t he na ti on al e co no m y. 3. Im pr ov em en t of m ar ke ti ng e ff ic ie nc y. 4. In cr ea se o f in co m e of t he f ar m er s an d al so p eo pl e en ga ge d in m ar ke ti ng . 5. R ed uc in g po st ha rv es t lo ss es b y re w ar di ng f ar m er s an d tr ad er s ab ou t st or ag e, h an dl in g, cl ea ni ng , an d gr ad in g et c. H ig h G O B 50 .0 0 50 .0 0 20 0. 00 30 0. 00 24 8. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 154 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 2) T o re du ce di st re ss s al e of cr op s of t he s m al l an d m ed iu m fa rm er s by pr ov id in g cr ed it fa ci lit ie s th ro ug h C om m er ci al B an ks ag ai ns t st or ed cr op s th ro ug h ex te ns io n of SH O G O R IP m od el . 3) T o re du ce p os t ha rv es t lo ss es a nd m ar ke ti ng c os t by pr ov id in g tr ai ni ng , m ot iv at io n an d ot he r pr om ot io na l ac ti vi ti es . 6. Pr ot ec tio n fr om di st re ss s al e in t he gl ut s it ua ti on b y cr ed it l in ka ge a nd al so b y pr oc es si ng & st or ag e im pr ov em en t 7. In cr ea se in t he s up pl y of h om em ad e pr o ce ss ed f oo ds in t he ar ea . 8. In cr ea se i n th e st an da rd o f liv in g & im pr ov em en t of so ci oe co no m ic co nd it io n of t he pe op le i n th e ar ea . 9. Ex te ns io n an d im pr ov em en t of p os t ha rv es t te ch no lo gy . 3. M uj ib na ga r In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (D A M C om po ne nt ) To ta l D A M Ju ly '1 1 Ju ne 1 6 77 2. 00 43 .5 9  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd pr od uc t de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s In cr ea se i n in co m e of t he f ar m er s of th e pr oj ec t ar ea by p ro vi di ng f ai r pr ic es t o th e fa rm er s th ro ug h lin ki ng f ar m s to m ar ke ts a nd ex te ns io n of m ar ke ti ng se rv ic es . 1. I m pr ov em en t of m ar ke ti ng s ys te m 2. C on tr ib ut io n to t he na ti on al e co no m y. 3. I m pr ov em en t of m ar ke ti ng e ff ic ie nc y. 4. I nc re as e of i nc om e of t he f ar m er s an d al so p eo pl e en ga ge d in m ar ke ti ng a t th e en d of t he p ro je ct pe ri od . 5. R ed uc ti on i n po st ha rv es t lo ss es b y re w ar di ng f ar m er s an d tr ad er s ab ou t st or ag e, h an dl in g, cl ea ni ng , an d gr ad in g et c. H ig h G O B 45 0. 00 10 0. 00 15 0. 00 28 .4 1 Annexes 155 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 To r ed uc e di st re ss sa le o f cr op s of th e sm al l an d m ed iu m f ar m er s by p ro vi di ng c re di t fa ci lit ie s th ro ug h C om m er ci al B an ks ag ai ns t st or ed cr op s th ro ug h ex te ns io n of SH O G O R IP m od el . To r ed uc e po st ha rv es t l os se s an d m ar ke ti ng co st b y pr ov id in g tr ai ni ng , m ot iv at io n an d ot he r pr om ot io na l ac ti vi ti es . 6. P ro te ct io n fr om di st re ss s al e in t he gl ut s it ua ti on b y cr ed it l in ka ge a nd al so b y pr oc es si ng & st or ag e im pr ov em en t 7. I nc re as e in s up pl y of h om e m ad e pr oc es se d fo od s in th e ar ea 8. I nc re as e in t he st an da rd o f liv in g & im pr ov em en t of so ci oe co no m ic co nd it io n of t he pe op le i n th e ar ea . 9. E xt en si on a nd im pr ov em en t of po st h ar ve st te ch no lo gy . H ig h G O B 3 2 4 2 .0 0 4 2 1 .8 2 1 5 5 0 .0 0 7 0 0 .0 0 5 4 1 .7 7 2 8 .4 1 0 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 156 A 6 .1 .8 : S e e d C e rt if ic a ti o n A g e n cy ( S C A ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tiv ity Pr oj ec t (I A PP ) SC A P ar t Ju ly /1 1 Ju ne /1 6 60 0. 00 15 0 To i m pr ov e pr od uc tiv ity t hr ou gh pr od uc tio n an d su pp ly o f qu al ity se ed & i m pr ov ed ag ri l. eq ui pm en ts t o ta rg et g ro up s  D ev el op m en t of n ew cr op s.  A do pt io n of n ew va ri et ie s an d pr od uc tio n pa ck ag es by t he f ar m er s.  H om es te ad pr od uc tio n in cr ea se d.  W at er u se e ff ic ie nc y in cr ea se d an d ra in w at er u se i nc re as ed .  Pr od uc ti on o f Q ua lit y se ed a nd B re ed in g m at er ia l. H ig h G oB + ID A 76 .0 0 18 0. 00 10 0. 00 94 .0 0 0. 00 A 6 .1 .9 : S o il R e so u rc e a n d D e v e lo p m e n t In st it u te ( S R D I) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. F oo d se cu ri ty pr og ra m m e 20 06 (1 st R ev is ed ) ( So il fe rt ili ty co m po ne nt )* Ja nu ar y/ 20 08 t o 31 D ec em be r 20 12 85 06 .0 0 53 05 .0 4  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd us e an d en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on 1. To I m pr ov e so il m an ag em en t in ta rg et a re as . 2. To i nc re as e di ve rs ity of c ro ps b ei ng gr ow n in t he t ar ge t ar ea s. 3. Y ie ld s of t ar ge t cr op s in cr ea se i n ta rg et a re as . H ig h G O B , Eu ro pe an U ni on 12 72 .0 0 12 00 .0 0 72 8. 96 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 157 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 To i m pr ov e fo od se cu ri ty o f th e fa m ili es o f sm al l an d m ar gi na l fa rm er s in a gr o ec ol og ic al ly di sa dv an ta ge d ar ea s. 2. S oi l re so ur ce m an ag em en t an d fa rm er s' se rv ic e* Ju ly /2 01 2 ju ne /2 01 5 19 99 .0 0 0. 00  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd us e an d en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on To i nc re as e cr op pr od uc tio n by su st ai ni ng pr od uc ti vi ty o f th e la nd a nd e ns ur in g ef fic ie nt u se o f fe rt ili ze rs . 1. C om pl et io n of 9 0 se m i de ta ile d up az ila su rv ey a nd p ri nt in g of 9 0 U pa zi la ni rd es hi ka ,9 00 u ni on Sa ha yi ka a nd U ni on fe st oo ns . 2. A ll la bo ra to ri es , fie ld of fic es a nd G IS u ni t ph ys ic al ly e qu ip pe d. M ed iu m G O B 95 .0 0 20 0. 00 12 00 .0 0 50 4. 00 0. 00 3. E st ab lis hm en t of F er til iz er Te st in g La bo ra to ri es an d R es ea rc h C en te rs * Ju ly /2 01 2 ju ne /2 01 5 31 15 .1 7 0. 00  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd us e an d en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on Es ta bl is hm en t of 2 st or ie d 4( fo ur ) fe rt ili ze r la bo ra to ry bu ild in gs a nd 1 st flo or o f ex is ti ng 1 (o ne ) la bo ra to ry bu ild in g w it h in st al lm en t of a ll ne ce ss ar y of fic e an d la bo ra to ry eq ui pm en t, ch em ic al s an d fu rn itu re . 1. La bo ra to ri es es ta bl is hm en t. 2. A na ly ti ca l se rv ic e st re ng th en ed . 3. To t ra in a bo ut 5 ,0 00 fa rm er s, f er ti liz er de al er s an d ot he r be ne fic ia ri es . H ig h G O B 17 4. 00 20 0 12 00 15 41 .1 7 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 158 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 4. I nt eg ra te d A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t in Pi ro jp ur G op al go nj B ag er ha t Ju ly /1 3 ju ne /1 8 11 7. 00 0. 00  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd us e an d en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on To a tt ai n fo od se cu ri ty t hr ou gh su st ai na bl e so il m an ag em en t pr ac ti ce s in t he pr oj ec t ar ea . 1. C om pl et io n of w ri ti ng u p of 1 99 U ni on S ah ay ik a, pr in ti ng o f 19 9 x 10 U ni on S ah ay ik a an d Fe rt ili ze r re co m m en da tio n fe st oo ns ( 19 9x 10 ) ha ng ed u p in t he pu bl ic p la ce s. 2. A nn ua l re po rt s on so il, w at er , ph ys ic al , ch em ic al c ha ng es , la nd u se , yi el d tr en ds , fa rm er pr ac ti ce s w ill b e pu bl is he d. H ig h G O B 0. 00 30 .0 0 30 .0 0 20 .0 0 37 .0 0 5. M in im iz in g ri ce yi el d ga p pr oj ec t Ja nu ar y/ 20 1 1 D ec em be r/ 2 01 3 93 .0 0 49 .9 9  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd us e an d en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on To a ch ie ve po te nt ia l yi el d of ri ce b y re du ci ng th e yi el d ga p at fa rm er 's l ev el th ro ug h us in g so il te st b as ed fe rt ili ze rs . 30 00 F FS es ta bl is he d, 30 00 fa rm er s, 3 75 S A A O an d 15 0 O ff ic er s tr ai ne d, 9 00 0 se ed be d 3 00 0 T. A m an & 60 00 B or o de m o es ta bl is he d, 30 00 Fi el d da ys , 15 3 w or ks ho ps a rr an ge d, 50 t ho us an d po st er & 7 00 0 tr ai ni ng m an ua l di st ri bu te d, Q ua lit y se ed pr oc ur ed a nd di st ri bu te d H ig h G O B 30 .0 0 13 .0 1 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 T o ta l S R D I 1 3 8 3 0 .1 7 53 55 .0 3 1 5 7 1 .0 0 1 6 4 3 .0 1 3 1 5 8 .9 6 2 0 6 5 .1 7 3 7 .0 0 Annexes 159 A 6 .1 .1 0 : A g ri cu lt u re I n fo rm a ti o n S e rv ic e ( A IS ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. In te ns ifi ca ti on o f A gr ic ul tu re In fo rm at io n Se rv ic e in T en A gr ic ul tu re R eg io ns ( 1s t R ev is ed ) Ju ly 2 00 8 Ju ne 2 01 5 22 73 .0 1 14 07 .7 4 1. To S tr en gt he n A gr ic ul tu ra l In fo rm at io n M an ag em en t Sy st em b y ac ce le ra ti ng & in te ns ify in g ne tw or k of A IS to w ar ds 1 0 (t en ) ag ric ul tu ra l r eg io ns ; 2. To i nt en si fy i nt er in st it ut io na l lin ka ge a m on g in fo rm at io n re la te d ag ri cu lt ur al in st it ut io ns ; 3. To a rr an ge tr ai ni ng /w or ks ho p/ se m in ar f or t he G O N G O s of fic er s, m ed ia r el at ed pe rs on ne l, pr og re ss iv e fa rm er s, l oc al e lit e pe rs on & e le ct ed m em be rs o f lo ca l go ve rn m en t fo r in cr ea si ng t he ir ca pa bi lit y in di ss em in at in g th e ag ri cu lt ur al in fo rm at io n an d te ch no lo gi es . 1. A rr an ge m en t of Tr ai ni ng a nd W or ks ho p/ Se m in ar : O ne h un dr ed ( 10 0) no s. t ra in in g an d 56 ( Fi ft y Si x) n os . of w or ks ho p/ se m in ar s w er e or ga ni ze d. T ot al 50 00 n os . pa rt ic ip an ts w er e tr ai ne d an d 16 80 no s. p ar ti ci pa nt s pa rt ic ip at ed i n th e w or ks ho p/ se m in ar s. 2. Pr od uc tio n of D oc um en ta ry F ilm an d Fi lle r/ Sp ot : El ev en n os . of do cu m en ta ry f ilm s an d 11 n os . of do cu m en ta ry f ill er s w er e pr od uc ed a nd ab ou t 28 00 n os . of vi de o sh ow s w er e pr oj ec te d in T V ch an ne ls a s w el l as m ob ile c in em a va n in r ur al a re as t o di ss em in at e m od er n te ch ni qu es of a gr ic ul tu re . 3. Pr od uc ti on o f Pr in t M at er ia ls : Su ff ic ie nt no s. o f pr in t, pu bl ic at io n & pu bl ic ity m at er ia ls (n ea r ab ou t 5 la cs ) w er e pr od uc ed a nd H ig h G O B G O B a nd 24 3. 00 31 8. 80 30 3. 47 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 160 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 di st ri bu te d to t he fa rm in g co m m un it ie s an d ta rg et p eo pl e. 4. Pr oc ur em en t of M ac hi ne ry , Eq ui pm en t & Fu rn it ur e' s: S om e m od er n m ac hi ne ry , eq ui pm en t, I C T to ol s an d fu rn it ur e in cl ud in g a pr in ti ng m ac hi ne w er e pr oc ur ed f or di ff er en t im po rt an t se ct io n of A IS , su ch as , e go ve rn an ce , au di o vi su al c en te r, pr es s se ct io n. 5. Pr oc ur em en t of Tr an sp or t Ve hi cl es : O ne M ob ile C in em a Va n fo r or ga ni zi ng fil m s ho w s, 0 5 no s. of R ep or ti ng S m al l Va n an d a do ub le pi ck u p w er e pr oc ur ed . B es id es , 10 n os . of M ot or C yc le s w er e pr oc ur ed . 6. C iv il W or k: T w o of fic e bu ild in gs o f re gi on al of fic e w er e co ns tr uc te d, o ne i n C om ill a an d an ot he r in R an ga m at i. 2. En ha nc in g R ur al C om m un ic at io n Se rv ic e fo r A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Ju ly 2 01 0 D ec em be r 20 12 40 2. 00 27 7. 54 1. To e ns ur e im pr ov ed liv el ih oo d an d fo od s ec ur ity th ro ug h pr ov id in g 1. Es ta bl is hi ng a C om m un ity R ad io St at io n at A m to ly i n B ar gu na D is tr ic t; M ed iu m G O B 7. 00 11 7. 46 58 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 161 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 th ro ug h C om m un ity R ur al R ad io P ro je ct ac tu al i nf or m at io n re qu ir ed b y a co st al b el t di sa st er fa ci ng c om m un ity th ro ug h m ai nt ai ni ng t he ir tr ad it io na l cu lt ur e an d le ar ni ng . 2. T o es ta bl is h a R ur al C om m un ity Se rv ic es ; 3. T o as si st f ar m er s to i nc re as e ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc tio n at f ar m an d ho m e le ve l , re ce iv in g kn ow le dg e of m od er n te ch no lo gy a t th ei r ow n co m m un ity us in g th ei r ow n la ng ua ge ; 4. T o w or k fo r th e in te ns iv e de ve lo pm en t of a si ng le c om m un ity , in st ea d of w ho le na ti on 2. E ff ec ti ve r ur al co m m un ic at io n an d co m m un ity r ad io se rv ic es f or liv el ih oo d im pr ov em en t; 3. S ta ff o f A IS , D A E, pa rt ne rs or ga ni za tio n an d co m m un ity a ge nt s tr ai ne d in r ad io br oa dc as tin g, co m m un ic at io n sk ill s an d m ul ti m ed ia m at er ia ls p ro du ct io n; 4. I m pr ov e in st itu tio na l an d lo ca l ca pa ci ti es in t he d es ig n an d im pl em en ta ti on o f co m m un ic at io n pl an s in s up po rt o f ag ri cu lt ur al ex te ns io n an d ad vi so ry s er vi ce s 3. En ha nc in g R ur al C om m un ic at io n Se rv ic e fo r A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t th ro ug h C om m un ity R ur al R ad io Pr oj ec t Ja nu ar y 20 12 J un e 20 14 18 80 .0 0 0. 00 1. T o co nd uc t fie ld su rv ey i n or de r to ge t fa rm er s pe rc ep tio n an d re al n ee d. 2. T o pr om ot e "E K ri sh i" a t th e se le ct ed a re as o f th e co un tr y th ro ug h A gr ic ul tu re In fo rm at io n an d a. A gr ic ul tu re In fo rm at io n an d C om m un ic at io n C en tr e (A IC C ) es ta bl is hm en t: 1 50 A IC C s w ou ld b e es ta bl is he d in 1 50 up az ill as u nd er 3 2 di st ri ct s ac ro ss t he co un tr y. N ec es sa ry IC T l og is ti cs w ou ld be p ro vi de d M ed iu m G O B 50 0. 00 80 0. 00 `5 80 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 162 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 C om m un ic at io n C en tr e (A IC C ) ru n by A IS . 3. To r ai se t he v oi ce of t he f ar m er s an d tr an sf or m t he ir gr ou p/ cl ub s (I PM , IC M , FF S, f oo d se cu ri ty g ro up a nd ot he rs ) in to fa rm er s in st it ut io n. 4. To i nc re as e th e ca pa bi lit y of t he fa rm er s to w or k ef fic ie nt ly f or be tt er p ro du ct io n an d al le vi at e th ei r po ve rt y. 5. To s tr en gt he n, in te ns ify a nd m od er ni ze di ss em in at io n of A gr ic ul tu ra l In fo rm at io n th ro ug h bo th P ri nt , El ec tr on ic m ed ia an d IC T. 6. To o rg an iz e tr ai ni ng an d w or ks ho p fo r th e ex te ns io n ag en ts , m ed ia pe rs on ne l, sc ie nt is ts a s w el l as fo r th e fa rm er s. 7. To e nh an ce q ua lit y se rv ic e de liv er y am on g th e fa rm er s by e st ab lis hi ng 1 0 di st ri ct l ev el of fic es . am on gs t th es e A IC C s. b. Es ta bl is hm en t of I C T la bs : 10 n os . of I C T la bs w ou ld b e es ta bl is he d in t en re gi on s. c. D ig it al a gr i In fo rm at io n/ kn ow le dg e B an k: T he re w ill b e 1 ce nt ra l ag ri cu lt ur al in fo rm at io n ba nk an d 10 d ig it al a gr i kn ow le dg e ba nk . d. Pr in t an d V id eo m at er ia ls de ve lo pm en t: D iff er en t pr in te d m at er ia ls ( lik e po st er /b oo kl et /f ol de r /l ea fle t et c. ) co nt ai ni ng a gr i in fo rm at io n an d te ch no lo gi es w ou ld be p ri nt ed . M or eo ve r di ff er en t fo rm s of 2 0 no s. v id eo m at er ia ls (f ilm /f ill er /d oc um en t ar y/ an im at io n/ m ul ti m ed ia e b oo k et c. ) w ou ld b e pr ep ar ed . e. C ap ac ity de ve lo pm en t an d aw ar en es s cr ea tio n: Fo r th e ca pa ci ty de ve lo pm en t of t he fa rm er s, e xt en si on pe rs on ne l, di ff er en t G O /N G O p er so nn el Annexes 163 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 27 b at ch es t ra in in g w ill b e ar ra ng ed , w he re t ot al 8 10 n os . pe rs on ne l w ill b e tr ai ne d. f. Ex pe di ti ng t he A IS ac ti vi ti es i n di st ri ct le ve l: Te n D is tr ic t of fic es in D ha ka , B og ra , D in aj pu r, M ou lo vi ba za r, C ox 's ba za r, B an de rb an , K us ti a, G op al ga nj , Ch an dp ur a nd S he rp ur w ou ld b e st eu p. g. Pr oc ur em en t of ve hi cl es : 10 n os . of re po rt in g sm al l va n fo r di st ri ct o ff ic es , 1 D ou bl e ca bi n pi ck u p an d 1 m ob ile c in em a va n, 2 3 m ot or c yc le s w ou ld b e pu rc ha se d. 4 5 5 5 .0 1 1 6 8 5 .2 8 7 5 0 .0 0 1 2 3 6 .2 6 8 8 3 .4 7 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 164 A 6 .1 .1 1 : B a n g la d e sh S u g a rc a n e R e se a rc h I n st it u te ( B S R I) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. St re ng th en in g B io te ch no lo gi ca l R es ea rc h of B an gl ad es h Su ga rc an e R es ea rc h In st itu te * N ov 2 01 0 D ec 2 01 4 88 4. 00 46 3. 62  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t.  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s. M ic ro p ro pa ga tio n of H ig h su ga r, H ig h yi el di ng s ug ar ca ne va ri et ie s, s te vi a an el it e sw ee te ni ng he rb , Pa lm yr a pa lm an d da te p al m f or ra pi d m ul ti pl ic at io n an d cl ea n se ed pr od uc tio n. V ar ie ty id en ti fic at io n an d pr ot ec tio n us in g D N A F in ge rp rin tin g, m ol ec ul ar ch ar ac te ri za ti on o f va ri et ie s, a ct iv e ge rm pl as m a nd de ve lo pm en t of M ar ke r A ss is te d Se le ct io n (M A S) f or su ga rc an e va ri et y se le ct io n. G en et ic tr an sf or m at io n of bi ot ic a nd a bi ot ic st re ss r es is ta nc e tr ai t( s) t hr ou gh A gr ob ac t er iu m m ed ia te d m et ho d of g en e tr an sf or m at io n.  C re at ed bi ot ec hn ol og ic al re se ar ch f ac ili tie s fo r su ga rc an e, d at e pa lm , Pa lm yr a pa lm , go lp at a, s te vi a an d ot he r su ga r cr op s at B SR I H ea d Q ua rt er , re gi on al s ta tio ns , su b st at io ns .  C re at io n of te ch no lo gy t ra ns fe r ca pa ci ty H ig h G O B 24 8. 00 10 0. 00 72 .3 8 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 165 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 2. Pi lo t Pr oj ec t fo r D at e pa lm , Pa lm yr a pa lm an d G ol pa ta D ev el op m en t Ju ly 2 01 0 D ec 2 01 3 86 2. 00 58 .8 6  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s D ev el op m en t of da te p al m , pa lm yr a pa lm a nd g ol pa ta va ri et ie s an d pr od uc tio n te ch no lo gi es . 2. D ev el op m en t of da te p al m , pa lm yr a pa lm a nd go lp at ag ur a nd sy ru p pr oc es si ng an d pr es er va tio n te ch no lo gi es . 3. D at e pa lm a nd pa lm yr a pa lm (N ov el & L oc al ) se ed lin g ra is in g, m ic ro p ro pa ga tio n, pl an ta ti on a nd m ai nt en an ce . a. C re at ed r es ea rc h fa ci lit ie s fo r da te pa lm , pa lm yr a pa lm an d go lp at a. b. In cr ea se t he pr od uc tio n of s ug ar , gu r an d ju ic e. c. In cr ea se d in co m e of th e ru ra l pe op le s an d th us c on tr ib ut e to r ed uc e po ve rt y an d up lif tm en t of nu tr it io na l st at us o f ru ra l pe op le s. d. C re at e en vi ro nm en t to d ev el op l oc al en tr ep re ne ur sh ip , m an uf ac tu re rs a nd tr ad er s. e. Pr op er u ti liz at io n of fa llo w l an d. M ed iu m G O B 25 0. 00 55 3. 14 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 3. C re at e Em pl oy m en t O pp or tu ni ti es o f C ha r D w el le rs i n G re at er R an gp ur D is tr ic ts t hr ou gh Su ga rc an e C ul ti va ti on Ju ly 20 11 Ju ne 2 01 5 82 1. 00 24 9. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd pr od uc t de ve lo pm en t. a. R es ea rc h fa ci lit ie s fo r su ga rc an e (g ur a nd ch ew in g va ri et y) cr ea te d. b. T he p ro du ct io n of gu r, sy ru p an d ju ic e in cr ea se d. c. Lo ca l en tr ep re ne ur sh ip , m an uf ac tu re rs a nd tr ad er s cr ea te d. H ig h JD C F 20 0. 00 25 0. 00 12 2. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 166 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 C re at e ye ar r ou nd w as e w is e em pl oy m en t an d se lf em pl oy m en t op po rt un ity f or m on ga a ff ec te d ch ar d w el le rs . 2. Im pr ov in g th e qu al ity o f lif e an d liv el ih oo d of t he un de rp ri vi le ge d pe op le l iv in g in t he ri ve ri ne c ha r ar ea s. 3. Es ta bl is h sm al l an d co tt ag e in du st ri es w it hi n or n ea rb y th e ri ve r ba si n w it h a vi ew t o en ha nc e in co m e of t he p oo r fa m ili es ( e. g. G ur m ak in g, s yr up & ju ic e pr ep ar at io n, pr es er va tio n an d m ar ke ti ng ). 4. Pr op er u ti liz at io n of ch ar h om es te ad an d fa llo w l an ds fo r cr op pr od uc tio n. 5. Em po w er w om en th ro ug h te ch no lo gy tr an sf er , po ve rt y re du ct io n an d nu tr it io na l im pr ov em en t. d. C ap ac ity b ui ld in g of th e re se ar ch er , st af f et c. o n po ve rt y re du ct io n. Annexes 167 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 4. Pi lo t Pr oj ec t fo r D ev el op m en t of Su ga rb ee t C ul ti va ti on Te ch no lo gi es i n B an gl ad es h Ju ly 20 11 Ju ne 2 01 4 34 5. 00 98 .1 0  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s Va ri et ie s/ C ul ti va rs co lle ct io n fr om ab ro ad a nd ch ar ac te ri za ti on . 2. Sc re en in g su ga rb ee t va ri et ie s su it ab le fo r cu lt iv at io n in B an gl ad es h. 3. D ev el op m en t of ag ro t ec hn ol og ie s fo r su ga rb ee t cu lt iv at io n. 4. St ud y on te ch no lo gi es f or tr ue s ee d pr od uc tio n, se ed lin g ra is in g an d m ic ro p ro pa ga tio n of s ug ar be et . 5. D ev el op m en t po st ha rv es t te ch no lo gi es a nd m ar ke ti ng s ys te m s of p ro du ce d su ga r be et f or s ug ar a nd ot he r by pr od uc ts . 6. Ec on om ic v ia bi lit y of s ug ar be et a s an al te rn at e cr op a nd ra w m at er ia l bo th fo r fa rm er a nd t he su ga r m ill er s. a. R es ea rc h fa ci lit ie s fo r su ga r be et c re at ed . b. T he p ro du ct io n of su ga r in cr ea se d. c. Ex te ns io n pe rs on ne l's t ra in ed on n ew t ec hn ol og ie s of s ug ar b ee t pr od uc tio n. d. Pr op er u ti liz at io n of l an d. M ed iu m G O B 13 7. 00 10 9. 90 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 T o ta l B S R I 2 9 1 2 .0 0 8 6 9 .5 8 8 3 5 .0 0 1 0 1 3 .0 4 1 9 4 .3 8 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 168 A 6 .1 .1 2 : B a ri n d M u lt ip u rp o se D e v e lo p m e n t A u th o ri ty ( B M D A ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. A ct iv at in g In op er ab le D ee p Tu be W el ls F or Ir ri ga tio n (1 st R ev is ed )* Ju ly 2 00 8 Ju ne 2 01 3 20 12 8. 00 16 64 8. 98 1. To a ct iv at e 25 69 no s. i no pe ra bl e/ un se rv ic ea bl e D T W th ro ug h el ec tr ifi ca ti on & en su re u ti liz at io n fo r ir ri ga ti on . 2. To e ns ur e ef fic ie nt us e of g ro un d w at er t hr ou gh co ns tr uc ti ng 2 56 9 no s. o f un de rg ro un d w at er d is tr ib ut io n ch an ne l (b ur ie d pi pe l in e) . 3. To e ns ur e co nt ro l ir ri ga ti on o f 0. 77 la kh h ec ta re o f la nd a nd a pr od uc tio n of 6 .6 6 la kh M . to ns o f fo od g ra in s m ar ke t va lu e of w hi ch i s ab ou t tk . 86 00 0. 00 la kh p er y ea r.  25 69 n os u nu se d D ee p tu be w el ls w ill co m e un de r ir ri ga ti on .  En su re c on tr ol ir ri ga ti on o f 0 .7 7 la kh h ec ta re l an d.  En su re e ff ic ie nt u se of g ro un d w at er . M ed iu m G O B 20 00 .0 0 14 79 .0 2 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 2. D ee pt ub e w el l in st al la ti on Pr oj ec t Ph as e ii* * Ja nu ar y 20 10 D ec em be r 20 13 24 78 5. 00 87 00 .0 0 1. To b ri ng 3 75 00 he ct ar es o f la nd un de r co nt ro lle d ir ri ga ti on m an ag em en t sy st em . 2. To i m pr ov e th e so ci o ec on om ic co nd it io n of t he pe op le i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea b y  37 50 0 he ct ar e of la nd w ill c om e un de r ir ri ga ti on .  En su re e ff ic ie nt u se of g ro un d w at er .  Pr od uc e 1. 87 5 la kh M .T f oo d gr ai ns . H ig h G O B 23 15 .0 0 30 00 .0 0 25 00 .0 0 80 00 .0 0 27 0. 00 Annexes 169 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 gr ow in g ad di ti on al 1. 87 5 la kh M T f oo d gr ai ns . 3. To c re at e 60 .0 0 la kh (0 .3 75 l ak h he ct ar es × 16 0 m an da ys ) m an d ay s jo b op po rt un ity f or m ar gi na l fa rm er s an d da ily w ag e la bo ur er s. 3. C om m an d ar ea de ve lo pm en t an d Tr ai ni ng Pr oj ec t, Ph as e 2. Ju ly '2 00 8 Ju ne '2 01 3 16 15 4. 00 12 99 9. 78 1. To e ns ur e th e co nt ro l an d be st us e of l ift ed g ro un d w at er . 2. To b ri ng a bo ut s el f su ff ic ie nc y in f oo d pr od uc tio n th ro ug h in cr ea si ng co m m an d ar ea w ith pr op er i rr ig at io n m an ag em en t. 3. To b ui ld u p a gr ou p of e ff ic ie nt a nd te ch ni ca l m an po w er th ro ug h pr ov id in g tr ai ni ng .  En su re b es t us e of lif te d gr ou nd w at er .  In cr ea se c om m an d ar ea b y co ns tr uc tin g bu rr ie d pi pe l in e. M ed iu m G oB & O w n Fu nd 25 00 .0 0 65 4. 22 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 4. C om m an d A re a Ex te nt io n & D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t. A pr il' 20 10 Ju ne '2 01 3 51 25 .0 0 28 40 .0 0 1. To E xt en d th e le ng th o f ex is ti ng pi pe lin e w at er di st ri bu ti on s ys te m of 1 00 0 no s. o f D ee p tu be w el ls . 2. To r ed uc e th e lo ss of i rr ig at io n w at er an d in cr ea se t he ir ri ga ti on e ff ic ie nc y of D T W s by co nt ro lle d us e of lif te d gr ou nd  12 01 0 he ct ar e of la nd c om es u nd er ir ri ga tio n th ro ug h ex is ti ng D ee p tu be w el ls .  A dd it io na l 0. 60 l ak h M T c ro ps w ill b e pr od uc ed . M ed iu m G O B 22 85 .0 0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 170 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 5. M ar ke ti ng o f A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc ts T hr ou gh D ev el op m en t of R ur al C om m un ic at io n Pr oj ec t ** O ct ob er ' 20 10 Ju ne '2 01 4 29 98 0. 00 28 00 .0 0 1. To p ro m ot e ru ra l co m m un ic at io n ne tw or k in 4 0 up az ill as a nd i ts re m ot es t pa rt o f 5 di st ri ct s R aj sh ah i, C ha pa i-N aw ab go nj , N ao ga on , N at or e an d Pa bn a by co ns tr uc ti ng Fe ed er R oa d in cl ud in g br id ge s/ cu lv er ts i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea . 2. To f ac ili ta te ag ri cu lt ur al a nd co m m er ci al ac ti vi ti es i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea , ea sy  40 0 km p ac ca r oa d w ill b e co ns tr uc te d.  Ea sy m ar ke ti ng fa ci lit ie s of ag ri cu lt ur al p ro du ct s w ill b e cr ea te d.  Ec ol og ic al b al an ce w ill b e re st or ed th ro ug h af fo re st at io n. H ig h G O B 20 00 .0 0 50 00 .0 0 60 00 .0 0 11 00 0. 00 31 80 .0 0 w at er i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea . 3. To p ro du ce ad di ti on al 0 .6 0 la kh M T ( A pp ro x. ) fo od gr ai ns f ro m in cr ea se d co m m an d ar ea o f in st al le d D T W s w it h pr op er i rr ig at io n m an ag em en t. 4. Fo r be tt er c ro p pr od uc tio n, 6 50 0 fa rm er s w ill b e tr ai ne d. 5. To r eh ab ila te de fe ct iv e/ ab an do ne d D T W t o co nt in ue ex is ti ng i rr ig at io n op er at io n. Annexes 171 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 6. * Pa nc ha ga rh , T ha ku rg ao n, D in aj pu r & Jo yp ur ha t In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu re D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t* Ju ly '2 01 0 Ju ne '2 01 3 27 09 5. 00 22 65 .0 0 T he m ai n ob je ct iv es of t he p ro je ct a re t o ex te nd i rr ig at io n fa ci lit y an d to im pr ov e th e so ci o ec on om ic c on di ti on of t he p eo pl e in t he pr oj ec t ar ea .  31 00 0 he ct ar e of la nd c om es u nd er co nt ro lle d ir ri ga ti on .  Su rf ac e w at er s to ra ge ca pa ci ty w ill b e bu ild up b y ex ca va ti ng ca na l an d po nd . M ed iu m G O B 25 00 .0 0 90 00 .0 0 80 00 .0 0 53 30 .0 0 0. 00 m ar ke ti ng f ac ili ty o f ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc ts a nd en su rin g fa ir p ri ce of f oo d gr ai ns t o lo ca l fa rm er s. 3. To u pg ra de s oc io ec on om ic d ev el op m en t of c om m on pe op le o f th e ar ea . A rr es t th e pr oc es s of d es er ti fic at io n & im pr ov e ec ol og ic al ba la nc e th ro ug h af fo re st at io n pr og ra m m e on bo th s id e of pr op os ed r oa ds b y la rg e sc al e pl an ta ti on . 4. To c re at e em pl oy m en t op po rt un it ie s in t he sh or t ru n fr om pr oj ec t co ns tr uc tio n ac ti vi ti es a nd i ts m ai nt en an ce w or k an d in l on g ru n fr om r oa d in fr as tr uc tu re de ve lo pm en t. Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 172 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. To b ri ng 3 10 00 he ct ar es o f la nd un de r co nt ro lle d ir ri ga ti on m an ag em en t sy st em b y in st al la ti on o f 12 00 n os . de ep tu be w el ls , re ex ca va ti on o f kh al s an d po nd s an d th ei r pr op er ut ili za ti on t hr ou gh ap pr op ri at e ir ri ga ti on a nd w at er m an ag em en t. 2. To e ns ur e su pp le m en ta ry ir ri ga ti on t o 29 50 0 he ct ar es o f la nd o f th e pr oj ec t ar ea . 3. To r e ex ca va te kh as k ha l, po nd s an d w at er b od y fo r in cr ea si ng t he ca pa ci ty o f re se rv oi r to h ol d ra in w at er i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea . 4. To c re at e ad di ti on al fo re st r es ou rc es f or de ve lo pi ng en vi ro nm en t an d so ci o ec on om ic co nd it io n th ro ug h pl an ta ti on o f 1 la kh fr ui t sa pl in g an d 2 la kh f or es t an d m ed ic in al s ap lin g.  3 la kh f or es t re so ur ce s w ill b e cr ea te d. Annexes 173 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 7. B ar in d R ai nw at er C on se rv at io n an d Ir ri ga tio n Pr oj ec t (P ha se i i) . M ar ch '2 01 1 Ju ne '2 01 4 23 89 5. 00 10 00 .0 0 1. To r e ex ca va te K ha s K ha l, Po nd an d w at er b od y fo r in cr ea si ng t he vo lu m e of r es er vo ir to h ol d ra in w at er in t he p ro je ct a re a an d to u se t hi s w at er f or v ar io us pu rp os es . 2. To e xt en d ir ri ga ti on fa ci lit ie s th ro ug h co ns er va ti on o f ra in w at er /s ur fa ce w at er n ea r ab ou t 50 00 0 he c. o f la nd by r e ex ca va tio n of 90 0 K m d er el ic t kh as k ha l/ kh ar i, 70 0 no s. o f kh as po nd /w at er b od y, 9 no . di gh i (i nc lu di ng w at er bo dy ) an d co ns tr uc ti on o f 21 2 no s. w at er co nt ro l st ru ct ur e & 2 no s. r ub be r da m .  Su rf ac e w at er re se rv oi r w ill b e cr ea te d of 9 00 k m kh al a nd 7 09 n os o f po nd .  Tw o R ub be r da m w ill be c on st ru ct ed f or su rf ac e w at er ir ri ga ti on .  50 00 0 he ct ar e of la nd c om e un de r su pp le m en ta ry ir ri ga ti on . H ig h G O B 20 00 .0 0 65 00 .0 0 80 00 .0 0 63 95 .0 0 5. To c re at e em pl oy m en t fa ci lit ie s fo r th e m ar gi na l fa rm er s an d da ily w ag e la bo re r. 6. To c re at e em pl oy m en t fa ci lit ie s fo r po or a nd d is tr es se d w om en . Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 174 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 3. To d ig 1 00 n os . of du g w el l fo r dr in ki ng p ur po se o f po or p eo pl e as w el l as s up pl em en ta ry ir ri ga ti on . 4. To d ev el op s ur fa ce w at er b od y fo r co ns er va ti on o f ra in w at er a nd t o re ch ar ge g ro un d w at er f ro m s uc h w at er b od y, t o m in im iz e te m pa ra tu re , to in cr ea se h um id ity in t he d ri es t pr oj ec t ar ea . 5. To c re at e ad di ti on al fo re st r es ou rc es f or de ve lo pi ng en vi ro nm en t an d so ci o ec on om ic co nd it io n th ro ug h pl an ta ti on o f 3 la kh fr ui ts s ap lin g an d 6 la kh f or es t & m ed ic in al p la nt sa pl in g. 14 71 62 .0 0 4 7 2 5 3 .7 6 1 5 6 0 0 .0 0 2 5 6 3 3 .2 4 2 4 5 0 0 .0 0 3 0 7 2 5 .0 0 3 4 5 0 .0 0 Annexes 175 A 6 .1 .1 3 : B a n g la d e sh J u te R e se a rc h I n st it u te ( B JR I) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. B as ic a nd A pp lie d R es ea rc h on J ut e (1 st R ev is ed ) Se pt em be r 20 10 A ug us t 20 18 11 82 0. 00 32 04 .3 6 1. To d ev el op s tr es s to le ra nt l in es /v ar ie ty w it h hi gh er p ro du ct iv ity . 2. To u pd at e th e dr af t ge no m e of t os sa j ut e an d ut ili za ti on o f us ef ul ge ne s in d ev el op in g m od er n ju te v ar ie ti es t o co m ba t th e up co m in g ch an ge d en vi ro nm en t. 3. To g en er at e th e se qu en ce o f de sh i ju te ge no m e an d an al yz e fo r pr ed ic ti ng u se fu l ge ne s. 4. To g en er at e th e se qu en ce i nf or m at io n of m ic ro be s in vo lv ed i n ju te r et tin g in d iff er en t en vi ro nm en t. 5. To s ca n th e av ai la bl e ju te g er m pl as m pr es er ve d in B JR I ge ne ba nk f or h ar ve st in g th e us ef ul g en e/ s. 6. To d ev el op a p la tf or m fo r ge no m e re se ar ch i n B an gl ad es h im m ed ia te ly be ne fit in g Ju te a nd la te r ot he r cr op s.  A m od er n ge no m e re se ar ch pl at fo rm i s ne ar in g co m pl et io n an d on t he ve rg e of b ei ng fu nc ti on al . O th er r es ea rc h w or ks a re i n pr og re ss . H ig h G O B 20 00 .0 0 15 00 .0 0 18 00 .0 0 20 00 .0 0 20 00 .0 0 T o ta l 1 1 8 2 0 .0 0 3 2 0 4 .3 6 2 0 0 0 .0 0 1 5 0 0 .0 0 1 8 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 0 .0 0 1 3 1 5 .6 4 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 176 A 6 .1 .1 4 : C o tt o n D e v e lo p m e n t B o a rd ( C D B ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. St re ng th en in g R es ea rc h A ct iv it ie s of C ot to n D ev el op m en t B oa rd Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 5 14 10 .1 5 18 0. 37 To i nc re as e re se ar ch ca pa ci ty o f C ot to n D ev el om en t B oa rd M od er n la bo ra to ri es , gr ee n ho us es , ge ne b an k w ill b e es ta bl is he d an d m od er n te ch no lo gi es o f co tt on p ro du ct io n w ill b e ev ol ve d. H ig h G O B 48 8. 00 60 0. 00 14 1. 78 0. 00 0. 00 1 4 1 0 .1 5 1 8 0 .3 7 4 8 8 .0 0 6 0 0 .0 0 1 4 1 .7 8 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 A 6 .1 .1 5 : B a n g la d e sh I n st it u te o f N u cl e a r A g ri cu lt u re ( B IN A ) O n g o in g P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. St re ng th en in g R es ea rc h an d Su b St at io ns D ev el op m en t of B IN A * M ay 2 01 0 Ju ne 2 01 4 11 29 2. 00 39 96 .2 1  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s a. D ev el op m en t an d im pr ov em en t of lo ca ti on s pe ci fic h ig h yi el di ng f ie ld a nd ho rt ic ul tu ra l cr op va ri et ie s to le ra nt t o bi ot ic ( di se as e an d in se ct s) a nd a bi ot ic (s al in ity , ac id ity , a. D ev el op ed ex po rt q ua lit y H Y V a m an r ic e ve ri ty (B IN A dh an 9 ) sa lin ity t ol er an t ri ce v ar ie ty B IN A dh an 8 , sa lin e to le ra nt gr ou nd nu t (B IN A ch in ab ad a m 5 & 6) , su m m er m un gb ea n (B IN A m oo g 8) , Pu ls es (B IN A m as ur 5 & 6) , So ya b ea n H ig h G O B 25 00 .0 0 35 00 .0 0 12 95 .7 9 0. 00 0. 00 Annexes 177 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 dr ou gh t, w at er lo gg in g an d su bm er ge nc e) st re ss es u si ng n uc le ar an d ad va nc ed te ch ni qu es . b. Es ta bl is h su b st at io n fa ci lit ie s th ro ug h ac qu is it io n of l an d, co ns tr uc ti on a nd fu rn is hi ng o f re se ar ch an d of fic e bu ild in g an d de ve lo pm en t of ex pe ri m en ta l fa rm . c. D ev el op m en t of re se ar ch f ac ili tie s fo r ne w d iv is io ns a nd su b st at io ns t hr ou gh pr oc ur em en t of eq ui pm en t, f ur ni tu re ch em ic al s, g la ss w ar e an d co ns um ab le s, e tc . d. C re at io n of m an po w er an d in fr as tr uc tu re f or th e ne w d iv is io ns (B io te ch no lo gy , H or ti cu lt ur e an d A gr ic ul tu ra l Ec on om ic s) a nd su bs ta ti on s (C ha pa in aw ab ga nj , B ar is al , K ha gr ac ha ri , Su na m ga nj , N oa kh al i, Sh er pu r an d G op al ga nj ). e. M ol ec ul ar ch ar ac te ri za ti on (D N A f in ge r pr in ti ng ) of c ul ti va rs , ba ct er ia l st ra in s, l an dr ac es a nd ge rm pl as m s to ck s. (B IN A so ya be an 1 & 2 ), M us ta rd (B IN A sa ri sh a 7 & 8) a nd S es am e (B IN A ti l 2) . b. Es ta bl is hm en t of 7 ne w s ub st at io ns (C ha pa in aw ab ga nj , B ar is al , K ha gr ac ha ri , Su na m ga nj , N oa kh al i, Sh er pu r an d G op al ga nj ) ar e on go in g. c. D ev el op m en t of ne w t hr ee di vi si on s (B io te cc hn ol og y, H or ti cu lt ur e, A gr ic ul tu re Ec on om ic s ar e on g oi ng . d. C re at io n of m an po w er f or 7 ne w s ub s ta ti on s an d th re e ne w di vi si on s is u nd er pr oc es s. e. M ol ec ul ar ch ar ac te ri za ti on re se ar ch i s on go in g. f. Id en ti fie d yi el d ga p of B IN A dh an 5 & 6. g. Tr ai ne d m or e th an 1 00 0 fa rm er s, 2 50 ex te ns io n Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 178 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 f. In ve st ig at e on t he ec on om ic a nd fin an ci al f ea si bi lit y, yi el d ga p, r is k an d ad op ti on o f th e va ri et ie s/ te ch no lo gi es de ve lo pe d at B IN A . g. D ev el op s ki lle d m an po w er f or ef fe ct iv e re se ar ch a nd di ss em in at io n of B IN A de ve lo pe d te ch no lo gi es t hr ou gh zo na l an d re gi on al tr ia ls a nd t ra in in g of ex te ns io n w or ke rs an d fa rm er s of ad ja ce nt a re as o f al l th e su bs ta ti on s. w or ke rs , 10 0 sc ie nt is t an d 50 fr om o th er re la te d or ga ni za tio n. T o ta l B IN A 1 1 2 9 2 .0 0 3 9 9 6 .2 1 2 5 0 0 .0 0 3 5 0 0 .0 0 1 2 9 5 .7 9 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 A 6 .2 .1 : M in is tr y o f A g ri cu lt u re ( S e cr e ta ri a t) L is te d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s2 5 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. Pr oj ec ts o n IC T D ev el op m en t, E G ov er na nc e Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 7 10 00 .0 0 0. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t 1. D ev el op in g IC T in fr as tr uc tu re fa ci lit ie s an d ex pa ns io n of co nn ec ti vi ty 1. Li nk in g w it h "D ig it al B an gl ad es h Se cr et ar ia t" es ta bl is he d. 2. E G ov er na nc e en ha nc ed . H ig h (M id te rm 2 nd t o 3r d ye ar o f M T SB P) G O B 10 0. 00 20 0. 00 20 0. 00 20 0. 00 30 0. 00 25 D ur in g M id t er m r ev ie w , an y ch an ge /o r ac tu al a llo ca ti on w ill b e re fle ct ed i n th e re vi se d do cu m en t. Annexes 179 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 2. Tr an sf or m in g tr ad it io na l fil e ba se d ad m in is tr at iv e w or k in th e pu bl ic s ec to r in to e go ve rn m en t/ di gi ta l go ve rn m en t fo r be tt er an d ef fic ie nt s er vi ce s to t he p eo pl e. 3. D ep lo ym en t of a ro bu st , co un tr y w id e sy st em o f m ar ke t in fo rm at io n w it h da ily pr ic e up da te o f al l m ar ke ts i n th e co un tr y. 4. D ig it al ly p ub lis h al l pu bl ic at io ns i n B an gl a us in g a st an da rd en co di ng t o gu ar an te e do cu m en t po rt ab ili ty 5. La un ch in g of o nl in e da ta s ha ri ng a nd de ci si on m ak in g sy st em . 6. C re at in g a ne tw or k fo r th e go ve rn m en t to co nn ec t al l ag en ci es 7. IC T t ra in in g to M in is tr y pe rs on ne l. 3. A ll th e ag en ci es un de r m in is tr y is co nn ec te d to a co m m on ne tw or k. 4. En ha nc ed o nl in e pu bl ic at io ns . 5. Tr ai ne d m an po w er . T o ta l M o A 1 0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 1 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 3 0 0 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 180 A 6 .2 .2 : D e p a rt m e n t o f A g ri cu lt u re E x te n si o n ( D A E ) Li st e d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. A gr ic ul tu ra l su pp or t fo r sm al lh ol de rs i n So ut hw es te rn R eg io n of B an gl ad es h Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 7 15 00 0. 00 0. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s To i m pr ov e liv el ih oo d of l an dl es s, m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er th ro ug h in te gr at ed an d su st ai na bl e ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc tiv ity . In cr ea se d fie ld cr op s, f ru its , ve ge ta bl es a nd sp ic es c ul ti va ti on . In cr ea se d C ro pp in g In te ns ity , in tr od uc ed sa lin e to le ra nt va ri et ie s et c. H ig h (I m m ed ia t e 1s t ye ar of M T SB P) ID B a nd G oB 20 0. 00 20 61 .7 0 43 07 .8 2 60 00 .0 0 24 30 .4 8 2. C ro p In te ns ifi ca ti on T hr ou gh F al lo w La nd U ti liz at io n in G re at er Sy lh et R eg io n Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 6) 14 91 5. 68 0. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t.  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  To i nc re as e cr op pi ng in te ns ity b y br in gi ng fa llo w l an d un de r cu lt iv at io n th ro ug h ef fic ie nt i rr ig at io n fa ci lit ie s ad op ti ng su st ai na bl e ag ri cu lt ur al te ch no lo gy .  Pu bl ic ity & Pu bl ic at io n  Tr ai ne d Fa rm er s/ SA A O / O ff ic er s  M ot iv at io n To ur  R al ly & W or ks ho p/ Se m in ar  D em on st ra ti on  R ep ai r, M ai nt en an ce & R eh ab ili ta ti on  M ac hi ne ry & A gr il eq ui pm en t's  C on st ru ct io n W or ks M ed iu m (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB 40 0. 00 15 00 30 00 55 00 45 15 .6 8 3. C it ru s D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (M an da ri n, or an ge a nd ot he rs ) Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 7 43 87 .0 0 0. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s To i nc re as e pr od uc tio n an d di ss em in at io n of C it ru s Fr ui ts . B lo ck D em o 64 8 ha , H om es te ad g ar de n 72 0 ha , 40 00 0 tr ai ne d Fa rm er s H ig h (I m m ed ia t e 1 st y ea r of M T SB P) G oB 20 0. 00 50 0. 00 10 00 .0 0 15 00 .0 0 11 87 .0 0 Annexes 181 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 4. Es ta bl is hm en t of tw o AT I at B an ch ar am pu r U pa zi la , B ra hm an ba ri a D is tr ic t an d Sa tu ri a U pa zi la , M an ik go ng D is tr ic t Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 5 23 40 .0 0 0. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t To i nc re as e te ch ni ca l m an po w er i n th e co un tr y fo r up gr ad in g ag ric ul tu ra l k no w le dg e an d sk ill a m on g yo un g ge ne ra ti on t o en ha nc e fo od s ec ur ity an d ag ric ul tu ra l g ro w th of t he c ou nt ry . Es ta bl is he d tw o AT I at B an ch ar am pu r an d Sa tu ri a. St ar ti ng D ip lo m a in ag ri . Ed uc at io n, tr ai ni ng o n Ex te ns io n se rv ic es an d ne w A gr ic ul tu ra l Te ch no lo gi es . M ed iu m (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB 0. 00 15 88 .5 3 75 1. 47 0. 00 0. 00 5. En ha nc em en t of A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tio n & R ur al Em pl oy m en t T hr ou gh Ex te ns io n of A gr ic ul tu ra l En gi ne er in g Te ch no lo gi es Pr oj ec t, p ha se ii * Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 7 20 79 4. 47 0. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s To m ak e ag ri cu lt ur e ec on om ic al ly pr of ita bl e th ro ug h re du ct io n of op er at io na l co st & lo ss es o f pr od uc es . In cr ea se d us e of su rf ac e w at er r e ex ca va ti on o f K ha l/ ca na l & w at er bo di es 1 32 00 00 fa rm er s, 2 13 0 st af f an d 98 55 0 of fic er tr ai ne d. H ig h (I m m ed ia t e 1 st y ea r of M T SB P) G oB 50 0. 00 20 47 .0 0 50 46 .0 0 80 00 .0 0 52 01 .4 7 6. M ag ur a, Je ss or e, N ar ai l, K hu ln a an d Sa tk hi ra In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu re D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (M JN K S IA D P) D A E pa rt Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 7 45 00 .0 0 0. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s To p ro m ot e sa lin ity re si st an t cr op v ar ie ty an d to d ev el op al te rn at iv e sy st em s to re du ce r is ks a nd ad ap ta tio n to e ns ur e fo od s ec ur ity o f th e ru ra l po or . Pr in tin g & p ub lic at io n, Tr ai ni ng , Fi el d da y, M ot iv at io n to ur co m pl et ed R al ly / Se m in ar /W or ks ho p  Te ch no lo gy di ss em in at io n  M id te rm ev al ua tio n & Su rv ey  R ep ai r an d M ai nt en an ce M ed iu m (( M id te rm 2 nd t o 3r d ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB 20 0. 00 19 61 .6 7 74 3. 15 74 3. 15 85 2. 03 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 182 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 7. Ex pa ns io n of U re a D ee p Pl ac em en t (U D P) Te ch no lo gy Ju ly /1 2 Ju ne /1 6) 10 41 2. 79 0. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s To i m pr ov e fa rm er 's in co m e & s oc io ec on om ic c on di ti on by i nc re as in g fa rm pr od uc tio n an d re du ci ng c os t by us in g te ch no lo gi es o f U D P & b al an ce d fe rt ili ze rs . 4. 19 m ill io n ha o f la nd c ov er ed b y U D P te ch no lo gy , 4. 2 m ill io n fa rm fa m ili es a do pt ed U D P te ch . 75 00 s ta ff a nd 0. 8 m ill io n fa rm er s tr ai ne d H ig h (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar o f M T SB P) U SA ID 10 0. 00 17 95 .0 3 40 29 .6 2 44 88 .1 4 0. 00 7 2 3 4 9 .9 4 0 .0 0 1 6 0 0 .0 0 1 1 4 5 3 .9 3 1 8 8 7 8 .0 6 2 6 2 3 1 .2 9 1 4 1 8 6 .6 6 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 Es ta bl is hm en t of P ul se a nd oi l Se ed M ul ti pl ic at io n Fa rm a nd Se ed Pr oc es si ng C en tr e at Su ba rn ac ha r in N oa kh al i D is tr ic t Pr oj ec t 1 Ju ly 2 01 2 Ju ne 2 01 6 35 38 .7 6 0. 00 1. E nh an ce p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce a cc es si bi lit y of af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. To e ns ur e pr op er u se o f qu al ity p ul se a nd o il se ed o f fa rm er s le ve l of ch ar a re a an d cr ea te fa ci lit ie s fo r pr oc es si ng an d pr es er va ti on c en te rs at t he a re a. To p ro du ce m or e cr op s in t he se ar ea s w hi ch w ill al le vi at e th e po ve rt y & u pl ift th e so ci o ec on om ic co nd it io n of t he pe op le . H ig h (I m m ed ia t e 1s t ye ar of M T SB P) G O B 0. 00 11 04 .5 4 10 56 .0 9 71 1. 19 66 6. 94 A 6 .2 .3 : B a n g la d e sh A g ri cu lt u re D e v e lo p m e n t C o rp o ra ti o n ( B A D C ) Li st e d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s Annexes 183 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 M ai nt en an ce , R eh ab ili ta ti on of B A D C 's Ex is ti ng Fe rt ili ze r G od ow ns a nd St re ng th en in g of F er ti liz er M an ag em en t A ct iv it ie s Pr oj ec t 2 Ju ly 2 01 2 Ju ne 2 01 7 13 43 0. 90 0. 00 1. E nh an ce p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce a cc es si bi lit y of af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. In cr ea se s to ra ge ca pa ci ty o f fe rt ili ze r an d en su re d is tr ib ut io n qu al ity f er ti liz er t o th e fa rm er s. In cr ea se 13 00 00 m t . st or ag e ca pa ci ty o f fe rt ili ze r. H ig h (I m m ed ia t e 1s t ye ar of M T SB P G O B 20 0. 00 38 00 .0 0 37 22 .9 7 26 41 .0 0 30 66 .9 3 M ag ur a Je ss or e N or ai l K hu ln a Sa tk hi ra In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (B A D C P ar t) 3 Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 7 14 50 0. 00 0. 00 1. E nh an ce p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s 2. E nh an ce a cc es si bi lit y of af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. To p ro vi de i rr ig at io n fa ci lit ie s to 2 21 00 he ct ar es o f cu lt iv ab le la nd . To p ro du ce ad di tio na l 52 75 0 m et ric to ns o f fo od gr ai n pe r ye ar . M ed iu m (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar o f M T SB P) G O B 20 0. 00 20 00 .0 0 50 00 .0 0 65 00 .0 0 80 0. 00 Sy lh et D iv is io n In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t 4 Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 4 84 29 .0 0 0. 00 To p ro vi de i rr ig at io n fa ci lit ie s to 6 93 0 he ct ar es o f cu lt iv ab le la nd . To p ro du ce ad di tio na l 3 11 85 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er ye ar . H ig h (( M id t er m 2 nd t o 3r d ye ar o f M T SB P) G O B 20 0. 00 11 01 .7 3 54 99 .0 4 16 28 .2 3 0. 00 Ea st er n In te gr at ed Ir ri ga tio n A re a D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t 5 Ju ly 2 01 3 Ju ne 2 01 7 10 20 0. 00 0. 00 1. T o co ns tr uc t m od er n ir ri ga ti on f ac ili ti es s uc h as D T W , su rf ac e an d su b su rf ac e ir ri ga ti on ch an ne l. R ee xc av at io n of k ha l na la a nd h os e pi pe f ac ili ti es . 2. P ro vi di ng t ra in in g to fa rm er s/ ow ne rs / op er at or /f ie ld m an o f ir ri ga ti on e qu ip m en t To p ro du ce ad di tio na l 4 97 85 m et ric t on s of fo od g ra in p er ye ar . H ig h (I m m ed ia t e 1s t ye ar of M T SB P G O B 20 0. 00 13 04 .9 0 50 03 .0 5 18 12 .3 0 18 79 .7 5 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 184 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 B ar is al Pa tu ak ha li Ir ri ga tio n A re a D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t 6 Ju ly 2 01 3 Ju ne 2 01 8 12 25 1. 41 0. 00 M ed iu m (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) 0. 00 13 41 .6 9 53 43 .0 0 30 13 .0 0 25 53 .7 2 M or de rn iz at io n, R ep ai r an d m ai nt en an ce of B A D C 's ex is ti ng s ee d pr od uc tio n, pr oc es si ng an d di st rib ut io n pr oj ec t 7 Ju ly 2 01 3 Ju ne 2 01 8 30 03 0. 87 0. 00 M ed iu m (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar ) of M T SB P 0. 00 30 00 .0 0 90 00 .0 0 90 00 .0 0 90 30 .8 7 M in or Ir ri ga tio n D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t th ro ug h So la r En er gy u se 8 Ju ly 2 01 3 Ju ne 2 01 8 19 32 6. 00 0. 00 M ed iu m (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) 0. 00 10 00 .0 0 50 00 .0 0 70 00 .0 0 63 26 .0 0 Pr oj ec t fo r Ir ri ga tio n Ex pa ns io n in Po ve rt y Pr on e A re a un de r gr ea te r R an gp ur D is tr ic t th ro ug h M od er n M in or Ir ri ga tio n Pr ac ti ce s 9 Ju ly 2 01 2 Ju ne 2 01 7 75 88 .9 7 0. 00 To p ro vi de i rr ig at io n fa ci lit ie s t o 61 42 he ct ar es of cu lt iv ab le la nd . To p ro du ce ad di tio na l 15 35 5 m et ric to ns o f fo od gr ai n pe r ye ar . H ig h (I m m ed ia te 1 st y ea r of M T SB P) G O B 30 0. 00 69 0. 43 25 23 .9 5 23 00 .0 0 17 74 .5 9 C on st ru ct io n of R ub be r D am t o U til iz e Su rf ac e W at er fo r En ha nc in g A gr ic ul tu ra l Pr od uc tio n Pr oj ec t* 10 Ju ly 2 01 1 Ju ne 2 01 6 16 65 0. 00 0. 00 To p ro vi de i rr ig at io n fa ci lit ie s to 9 60 0 he ct ar es o f cu lt iv ab le la nd . To p ro du ce ad di tio na l 33 60 0 m et ric to ns o f fo od gr ai n pe r ye ar . H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) G O B 50 0. 00 20 00 .0 0 46 13 .9 2 40 00 .0 0 55 36 .0 8 13 59 45 .9 1 0 .0 0 1 6 0 0 .0 0 1 7 3 4 3 .2 9 4 6 7 6 2 .0 2 3 8 6 0 5 .7 2 3 1 6 3 4 .8 8 Annexes 185 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 C ro p pr od uc tio n in st re ss p ro ne ar ea s th ro ug h te ch no lo gi ca l in te rv en ti on to a dd re ss cl im at e ch an ge i ss ue 1 Ja nu ar y/ 20 13 D ec /2 01 7 80 5. 00 0. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al d ev el op m en t  En ha nc e pr od uc ti on a nd pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s To s tr en gt he n en vi ro nm en ta l st re ss re se ar ch f or s us ta in ab le cr op p ro du ct io n in t he pr ob le m a re as o f B an gl ad es h th ro ug h de ve lo pm en t of en vi ro nm en ta l st re ss to le ra nt v ar ie ti es a nd te ch no lo gi es ;  To i nc re as e cr op pi ng in te ns ity a nd p ro du ct io n in t he p ro bl em a re as th ro ug h di ss em in at io n of st re ss t ol er nt v ar ie ty a nd te ch no lo gy ;  To d ev el op a bi ot ic s tr es s (S al in ity , dr ou gh t, w at er lo gg in g, te m pe ra tu re , ha il st or m et c) t ol er an t cr op va ri et ie s th ro ug h st ud di ng t he s tr es s to le ra nt m ec ha ni sm s;  To d ev el op i m pr ov ed pr od uc ti on t ec hn ol og ie s fo r th e st re ss a re as co m ba ti ng c lim at e ch an ge ; M ed iu m (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB + D on or A ge nc y 10 0. 00 20 0. 00 20 0. 00 20 0. 00 10 5. 00 A 6 .2 .4 : B a n g la d e sh A g ri cu lt u ra l R e se a rc h I n st it u te ( B A R I) L is te d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 186 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7  To p ro du ce br ee de r/ fo un da ti on s ee d of d iff er en t cr op s;  To d is se m in at e po te nt ia l te ch no lo gi es t hr ou gh pa rt ic ip at or y fie ld de m on st ra ti on , fie ld d ay , tr ai ni ng , w or ks ho p, sy m po si um , bo ok le ts , le af le ts , fa ct s he et s an d el ec tr on ic m ea ns . St re ng th en in g pu ls e pr od uc tio n fo r liv el ih oo ds , fo od a nd nu tr it io na l se cu ri ty , an d fo r su st ai na bl e in te ns ifi ca ti on in t he c er ea l ba se d cr op pi ng sy st em i n B an gl ad es h 2 Ja nu ar y/ 20 13 D ec /2 01 7 98 5. 00 0. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc ti on a nd pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s G er m pl as m e nh an ce m en t fo r hi gh er a nd s ta bl e yi el d w it h re si st an ce t o bi ot ic a nd a bi ot ic st re ss es ; im pr ov ed pr od uc ti on t ec hn ol og ie s af fo rd ab le t o sm al l f ar m er s.  Pr od uc tio n an d di st ri bu ti on o f qu al ity se ed s of f ar m er p re fe rr ed va ri et ie s al on g w it h pr od uc ti on t ec hn ol og ie s  Im pr ov em en t of c ap ac ity at f ie ld l ev el s fo r fa rm er pa rt ic ip at or y ad ap ti ve re se ar ch a nd t ec hn ol og y tr an sf er f or a do pt io n an d ex pa ns io n of i m pr ov ed pu ls e pr od uc tio n te ch no lo gi es  N at ur al r es ou rc e co ns er va ti on , en vi ro nm en ta l pr ot ec tio n, im pr ov ed s oi l he al th , an d su st ai na bl e ag ri cu lt ur e. M ed iu m (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB + D on or A ge nc y 20 0. 00 20 0. 00 20 0. 00 20 0. 00 18 5. 00 Annexes 187 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7  Pu ls es a s an o pt io n in ri ce f al lo w s an d fo r va ri ou s pr od uc tio n sy st em s. In te rv en tio n of I m pr ov ed So il an d W at er M an ag em en t Te ch no lo gi es fo r C ro p Pr od uc tio n in C oa st al a nd D ro ug ht P ro ne A re as o f B an gl ad es h. 3 Ja nu ar y/ 20 13 D ec /2 01 5 26 0. 00 0. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc ti on a nd pr od uc tiv ity o f cr op s.  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. To a ss es s th e ch an ge o f cl im at e by a na ly zi ng lo ng t er m a gr o cl im at e pa ra m et er s an d to p re di ct th e fu tu re s ce na ri o;  To i nc re as e cr op a nd w at er p ro du ct iv ity b y th e ad ap ta ti on o f im pr ov ed sa lin ity a nd d ro ug ht m an ag em en t te ch ni qu es fo r cr op p ro du ct io n;  To i nc re as e su rf ac e w at er ir ri ga ti on s ou rc es d ur in g dr y se as on b y re no va tio n of e xi st in g po nd s, c an al s an d di tc he s of p ilo t ba si s;  To m in im iz in g th e yi el d lo ss es o f cr op y ie ld d ue to t he e ff ec t fo c lim at e ch an ge ;  Tr an sf er t he m at ur ed te ch no lo gi es t hr ou gh f ie ld da ys , tr ai ni ng s, de m on st ra ti on s an d pu bl ic at io ns . H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB + D on or A ge nc y 10 0. 00 10 0. 00 60 .0 0 0. 00 0. 00 2 0 5 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 4 0 0 .0 0 5 0 0 .0 0 4 6 0 .0 0 4 0 0 .0 0 2 9 0 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 188 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 C ro p In te ns ifi ca ti o n T hr ou gh Fa llo w L an d U ti liz at io n in G re at er Sy lh et R eg io n (B R R I Pa rt ) 1 Ju ly /2 01 2 Ju ne /2 01 6 10 00 .0 0 0. 00  In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc tiv ity i n th e cr op se ct or Im pr ov em en t of ar ea s pe ci fic te cn ol og ie s an d go od q ua lit y se ed . M ed iu m (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar of M T SB P) G oB 10 0. 00 20 0. 00 20 0. 00 30 0. 00 20 0. 00 M ag ur a Je ss or e N ar ai l K hu ln a Sa th kh ir a In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (B R R I Pa rt ) 2 Ju ly /2 01 2 Ju ne /2 01 6 11 00 .0 0 0. 00  In cr ea se p ro du ct io n an d pr od uc tiv ity i n th e cr op se ct or Im pr ov em en t of ar ea s pe ci fic te cn ol og ie s an d go od q ua lit y se ed . M ed iu m (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar of M T SB P) G oB 10 0. 00 20 0. 00 25 0. 00 30 0. 00 35 0. 00 2 1 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 4 0 0 .0 0 4 5 0 .0 0 6 0 0 .0 0 5 5 0 .0 0 A 6 .2 .5 : B a n g la d e sh R ic e R e se a rc h I n st it u te ( B R R I) L is te d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 M ag ur a Je ss or N ar ai l Kh ul na S at kh ir a In te gr at ed A gr ic ul tu ra l D ev el op m en t Pr oj ec t (D A M pa rt ). 1 Ju ly '1 1 J un e 16 20 00 .0 0 0. 00  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s.  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss an d pr od uc t de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s. 1. T o in cr ea se i nc om e of fa rm er s of t he p ro je ct 1. I m pr ov em en t of m ar ke ti ng sy st em . 2. C on tr ib ut io n to t he na ti on al ec on om y. M ed iu m (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB 10 0. 00 10 0. 00 20 0. 00 10 00 .0 0 60 0. 00 A 6 .2 .6 : D e p a rt m e n t o f A g ri cu lt u ra l M a rk e ti n g ( D A M ) E x p e ct e d P ro je ct s Annexes 189 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 ar ea b y pr ov id in g fa ir pr ic es t o th e fa rm er s th ro ug h lin ki ng f ar m s to m ar ke ts a nd e xt en si on o f m ar ke ti ng s er vi ce s. 2. T o el im in at e di st re ss s al e of c ro ps o f th e sm al l an d m ed iu m f ar m er s by pr ov id in g cr ed it f ac ili ti es th ro ug h C om m er ci al B an ks a ga in st s to re d cr op s th ro ug h ex te ns io n of S H O G O R IP m od el . 3. T o re du ce p os t ha rv es t lo ss es a nd m ar ke ti ng co st b y gi vi ng t ra in in g. 3. I m pr ov em en t of m ar ke ti ng ef fic ie nc y. 4. I nc re as ed in co m e of t he fa rm er s an d al so p eo pl e en ga ge d in m ar ke ti ng le ve l at t he en d of t he pr oj ec t pe ri od . 5. R ed uc ti on o f po st h ar ve st lo ss es b y aw ar di ng fa rm er s an d tr ad er s ab ou t st or ag e, ha nd lin g, cl ea ni ng , an d gr ad in g et c. 6. P ro te ct io n fr om d is tr es s sa le i n th e gl ut s it ua ti on by c re di t lin ka ge a nd al so b y pr oc es si ng & st or ag e im pr ov em en t 7. I nc re as ed su pp ly o f ho m e m ad e pr oc es se d fo od s. G oB Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 190 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s S L N o Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st ( T k in l a k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 ( T k i n la k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t o u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 C ro p In te ns ifi ca ti o n T hr ou gh Fa llo w L an d U ti liz at io n in Sy lh et R eg io n (D A M p ar t) . 2 Ju ly '1 2 J un e 17 23 40 .0 0 0. 00  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty o f af fo rd ab le i np ut s an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss an d pr od uc t de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s 1. T o bu ild u p su st ai na bl e lin ka ge s am on g fa rm er s, tr ad er s, p ro ce ss or s an d ex po rt er s in o rd er t o m in im iz e m ar ke ti ng c os t an d in cr ea se p ro fit ab ili ty by p ro vi di ng m ar ke tin g in fo rm at io n an d ot he r se rv ic es . 2. T o de ve lo p pr oc es si ng an d pr es er va ti on s ys te m fo r ag ri cu lt ur al p ro du ce s at h ou se ho ld l ev el w it h a vi ew t o re du ce p os t ha rv es t lo ss es a nd en su ri ng h ou se ho ld le ve l nu tr it io n th ro ug ho ut t he y ea r. 3. T o im pr ov e nu tr it io na l st at us , ge ne ra ti on o f w om en e m pl oy m en t op po rt un it ie s fo r po ve rt y al le vi at io n. 1. E xp an si on o f lo w c os tp ro ce ss in g te ch no lo gy , pr es er va tio n of ag ri cu lt ur al pr od uc es a t ho m es te ad le ve l am on g 62 50 f ar m er s, tra de rs , e xp or te rs , pr oc es so rs e tc . an d tr ai ne d up 50 D AM o ff ic er s in r el ev an t fie ld . 2. E xt en si on o f lo w c os t po st ha rv es t ha nd lin g an d m ar ke ti ng pr ac ti ce s at pr od uc er 's le ve l. 3. I nc re as ed o n fa rm i nc om e of t he t ar ge t fa rm er s by t he en d of th e pr oj ec t pe rio d. R ed uc tio n of p re se nt le ve l of p os t ha rv es t lo ss es b y 30 % . 4. G en er at io n of em pl oy m en t op po rt un ity i n th e pr oj ec t ar ea s pa rt ic ul ar ly fo r vi lla ge w om en . 5. P ro te ct io n fr om di st re ss s al e by a bs or bi ng se as on al g lu t th ro ug h pr oc es sin g an d pr es er va tio n at h om e st ea d le ve l. M ed iu m (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB 10 0. 00 30 0. 00 50 0. 00 10 00 .0 0 44 0. 00 4 3 4 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 4 0 0 .0 0 7 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 0 .0 0 1 0 4 0 .0 0 Annexes 191 A 6 .2 .7 : S e e d C e rt if ic a ti o n A g e n cy ( S C A ) Li st e d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. M od er ni za ti on o f Se ed C er tif ic at io n A ge nc y Pr oj ec t Ju ly /1 3 Ju ne /1 7 15 00 0. 00 0. 00 1. I nc re as in g th e ca pa ci ty o f Se ed C er ti fic at io n ag en cy . 2. M od er ni za ti on o f Se ed T es ti ng fa ci lit ie s fo r IS TA ac cr ed ita tio n. 3. C ap ac ity b ui ld in g of re gi on al a nd m in i re gi on al t es tin g la bo ra to ri es . 4. S tr en gt he ni ng s ee d m ar ke t m on it or in g ac ti vi te s. 5. P ro vi di ng h om e an d ab ro ad t ra in in g an d de ve lo pm en t of I C T. 1. A va ili bi lit y of qu al ity s ee d in cr ea se d. 2. Q ua lit y of s ee d te st a nd n um be r of t es te d sa m pl es in cr ea se d 3. D N A f in ge r pr in ti ng te ch no lo gy st re ng ht he nd 4. I ST A a cc re di ta tio n of N ST L ac hi ev ed . 5. D ig it al iz at io n of SC A a ct iv it es . 6. S ki lle d te ch ni ca l pr of es si on al s de ve lo pe d. 7. T ra ns po rt v eh ic le fo r H Q , N ST L, R ST L, V T L, R FO an d FO o ff ic es 8. F ac ili ti es o f co nt ro l ro om a t G az ip ur in cr ea se d. 9. N ec es sa ry co ns tr uc ti on a nd re no va tio n. 10 . Pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr od uc tio n of cr op s in cr ea se d co nt ri bu ti ng t he de ve lo pm en t of fa rm f am ili es . 11 . Ta gg in g sy st em im pr ov ed H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P G O B 0. 00 10 00 .0 0 25 00 .0 0 60 00 .0 0 55 00 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 192 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 St re ng th en in g Se ed C er ti fic at io n Se rv ic es P ro je ct . Ju ly /1 3 Ju ne /1 7 62 75 .0 0 0. 00 1. E st ab lis hm en t of n ew fie ld l ev el o ff ic es a nd in cr ea si ng t he ca pa ci ty o f fie ld of fic es t o co ve r m or e ar ea s to m ee t in cr ea si ng d em an d of se ed i n th e co un tr y an d to s up pl y ef fic ie nt a nd t im el y fie ld i ns pe ct io n se rv ic es . 2. C ap ac ity b ui ld in g of Va ri et y Te st in g La bo ra to ry an d m od er ni za ti on o f V C U (v al ue f or c ul ti va ti on an d u se s) t es t pr oc ed ur e. 3. C ap ac ity b ui ld in g of Se ed T es ti ng La bo ra to ri es w it h se ed he al th t es t fa ci lit ie s. 4. A rr an gi ng t ra in in g fo r fa rm er s, s ee d pr od uc er s, s ee d de al er s, o ff ic er s & st af f. 5. S tr en gt he ni ng m ar ke t m on it or in g ac ti vi ti es t o st op im po rt a nd s al e of ad ul te ra te d an d lo w qu al ity se ed i n th e m ar ke t. 1. P ro du ct io n of ce rt ifi ed s ee d in cr ea se d, q ua lit y of se ed i n th e co un tr y in cr ea se d, f oo d se cu ri ty ac hi ev ed . 2. G en et ic al ly p ur e va ri et ie s of c ro ps re le as ed , fa rm er 's n ee d ba se d va ri et ie s m ad e av ai la bl e. 3. Q ua lit y of s ee d te st a nd n um be r of t es te d sa m pl es in cr ea se d, t im el y de liv er y of s ee d te st r es ul ts . 4. H um an r es ou rc e in s ee d se ct or de ve lo pe d, aw ar en es s fo r pr od uc in g an d us in g hi gh qu al ity s ee d in cr ea se d. 5. A va ila bi lit y of qu al ity s ee d in cr ea se d, fa rm er s sa ve d fr om l os s an d de ce pt io ns . M ed iu m (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) G O B 0. 00 30 0. 00 15 00 .0 0 30 00 .0 0 14 75 .0 0 2 1 2 7 5 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 1 3 0 0 .0 0 4 0 0 0 .0 0 9 0 0 0 .0 0 6 9 7 5 .0 0 Annexes 193 A 6 .2 .8 : B a ri n d M u lt ip u rp o se D e v e lo p m e n t A u th o ri ty ( B M D A ) Li st e d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. R eh ab ili ta ti on o f O ld D ee p Tu be w el ls a nd C on st ru ct io n of R ec ha rg e W el l on E xp er im en ta l B as is Ju ly '2 01 2 Ju ne '2 01 5 85 91 .0 0 0. 00 1. C re at in g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t. 2. i nc re as e G ro un d w at er r ec ha rg e th ro ug h re ch ar ge w el l. 3. T o re ha bi lit at e ex is tin g Pa ck ed u p/ C ho ke d up / sa nd p um pi ng D ee p Tu be W el ls f or co nt in uo us i rr ig at io n. 4. T o ca rr y on p re se nt ir ri ga ti on s ys te m o f 18 00 0 (a pp ro x. ) he ct ar e la nd o f th e ar ea . 5. T o m ak e su re pr od uc ti on o f 1. 56 l ac M T ( ap pr ox .) f oo d gr ai ns p er a nn um a nd to e ns ur e 28 .8 l ac m an d ay s (a pp ro x. ) jo b op po rt un it ie s fo r D ee p Tu be W el l's op er at or s, V en di ng D ea le rs , se cu ri ty gu ar d an d so o n. 1. G ro un d w at er re ch ar ge w ill b e en ha nc ed . 2. I rr ig at io n fa ci lit ie s w ill b e co nt in ui ng th ro ug h pr ob le m at ic D ee p tu be w el ls . 3. P re se nt i rr ig at io n fa ci lit ie s of 18 00 0 he ct ar e la nd w ill co nt in ue . H ig h (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar of M T SB P G O B 20 0. 00 20 00 .0 0 35 00 .0 0 28 91 .0 0 0. 00 2. B M D A S ee d Pr od uc tio n St re ng th en in g Pr oj ec t* Ju ly '2 01 2 Ju ne '2 01 7 34 16 .4 3 0. 00 1. F ill u p th e de fic it o f qu al ity p ad dy a nd w he at s ee d in t he pr oj ec t ar ea . 2. M ot iv at in g fa rm er s fo r pr od uc in g im pr ov ed s ee d of lo ca l an d hi gh yi el di ng v ar ie ty th ro ug h de m on st ra ti on p lo t. 1. 3 00 0 M T s ee d pr od uc tio n ca pa ci ty b ui ld up of B M D A . 2. W ip in g qu al ity se ed d ef ic it . M ed iu m (M id t o lo ng t er m ) G O B 10 0. 00 85 4. 75 69 7. 44 86 9. 27 89 4. 97 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 194 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 3. T ra in f ar m er s on p ro du ct io n, pr oc ur em en t, pr oc es si ng a nd pr es er va tio n of qu al ity p ad dy a nd w he at s ee d. 3. I rr ig at io n Pr og ra m m e T hr ou gh S ur fa ce W at er A ug m en ta tio n* Ja nu ar y 20 13 Ju ne 20 16 93 80 .9 9 0. 00 1. T o re du ce t he s tr es s on g ro un d w at er b y ut ili za ti on o f su rf ac e w at er . 2. T o in cr ea se w at er re se rv oi r by r e ex ca va ti ng 3 0k m K ha s K ha l an d co ns tr uc ti ng 1 0 no s su bm er ge d w ei r to ho ld s ur fa ce w at er f or ir ri ga ti on a nd o th er pu rp os es . 3. T o ex te nd c on tr ol le d ir ri ga ti on f ac ili ti es i n 12 00 0 he ct ar e la nd th ro ug h 27 5 no s of LL P an d 2, 51 ,6 25 m B ur ri ed p ip e lin e. 4. T o re du ce i rr ig at io n co st u si ng a va ila bl e su rf ac e w at er i ns te ad of g ro un d w at er . 5. T o cr ea te a dd it io na l fo re st r es ou rc es th ro ug h pl an ta ti on o f 1. 10 la kh f ru its , fo re st an d m ed ic in al s ap lin gs an d th us i m pr ov e en vi ro nm en ta l c on di tio n. 6. T o de ve lo p a m in i Ec o pa rk o n th e ba nk of t he r e ex ca va te d ca na l f or r ec re at io n of th e ru ra l po pu la ti on . 1. 3 0k m w at er re se rv oi r w ill b e to h ol d su rf ac e w at er . 2. 1 20 00 h ec ta re la nd w ill c om e un de r su rf ac e ir ri ga ti on . 3. A m in i Ec ho p ar k w ill b e es ta bl is he d fo r re cr ea tio n. H ig h (I m m ed ia te 1 st y ea r of M T SB P G O B 20 0. 00 24 03 .5 5 29 08 .8 9 38 68 .5 5 0. 00 Annexes 195 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 4. S m ar t C ar d B as ed P re pa id Pu m p U sa ge s A nd E ne rg y M ea su ri ng Sy st em P ro je ct (P PU EM ) Ph as e II * Ju ly '2 01 2 Ju ne '2 01 5 24 80 .5 9 0. 00 1. T o su pp ly i rr ig at io n w at er t o th e cr op fie ld w it h pr e pa ym en t sy st em ac co rd in g to f ar m er s ac tu al d em an d. 2. T o es ta bl is h Pr e pa id Pu m p U sa ge s an d En er gy M ea su ri ng U ni t in 4 50 0 D ee p Tu be W el ls . 3. T o in cr ea se a dd it io na l em pl oy m en t fa ci lit ie s fo r th e la bo re rs a nd m ar gi na l fa rm er s du ri ng a nd a ft er pr oj ec t im pl em en ta ti on . 4. T o pr ev en t m et er ta m pe ri ng a nd t hu s to c he ck p ilf er ag e of el ec tr ic ity . 1. A ut om at io n of ir ri ga ti on s ys te m of 4 50 0 D ee p tu be w el ls w ill b e es ta bl is he d. 2. R ev en ue co lle ct io n fu nc ti on in g sm oo th ly . M ed iu m (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar o f M T SB P G O B 10 0. 00 69 6. 48 89 4. 16 78 9. 95 0. 00 2 3 8 6 9 .0 1 0 .0 0 6 0 0 .0 0 5 9 5 4 .7 8 8 0 0 0 .4 9 8 4 1 8 .7 7 8 9 4 .9 7 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 196 A 6 .2 .9 : B a n g la d e sh J u te R e se a rc h I n st it u te ( B JR I) L is te d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. D ev el op m en t an d D is se m in at io n of A gr ic ul tu ra l Te ch no lo gi es f or Ju te a nd A lli ed Fi br e C ro ps Ju ly 2 01 3 Ju ne 2 01 5 98 8. 00 0. 00  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s Pr om ot e re se ar ch a nd de ve lo pm en t of h ig h yi el di ng v ar ie ti es (H Y V ) of j ut e an d al lie d fib re c ro ps a nd di ve rs ifi ed j ut e pr od uc ts . D is se m in at e m od er n ju te a nd j ut e se ed p ro d u ct io n te ch n o lo g ie s at fa rm er 's l ev el a nd po pu la ri ze t he di ve rs ifi ed j ut e pr od uc ts . R es ea rc h Fa ci lit ie s fo r bo th ag ri cu lt ur al a nd te ch no lo gi ca l w in g w ill b e de ve lo pe d di ss em in at ed a nd po pu la ri ze d. H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m ) G O B 10 0. 00 21 9. 25 50 9. 75 15 9. 00 0. 00 T o ta l B JR I 9 8 8 .0 0 0 .0 0 1 0 0 .0 0 2 1 9 .2 5 5 0 9 .7 5 1 5 9 .0 0 0 .0 0 Annexes 197 A 6 .2 .1 0 : C o tt o n D e v e lo p m e n t B o a rd ( C D B ) Li st e d e x p e ct e d P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. E xt en si ve C ot to n C ul ti va ti on Pr oj ec t* Ju ly , 20 13 to J un e, 20 18 12 00 0. 00 0. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 1. I nc re as e ar ea u nd er co tt on c ul ti va ti on b y br in gi ng n ew a re as w it ho ut d is tu rb in g fo od s ec ur ity . 2. I m pr ov e ca pa bi lit ie s of C ot to n D ev el op m en t B oa rd . 1. T ot al a re a un de r co tt on c ul ti va ti on w ill b e in cr ea se d. 2. T ec hn ol og y di ss em in at io n an d ex te ns io n ca pa bi lit ie s of C D B p er so nn el w ill b e im pr ov ed . 3. I m pr ov e ca pa bi lit ie s of C ot to n D ev el op m en t B oa rd . H ig h (M id t er m 2n d to 3 rd ye ar o f M T SB P) G O B 20 0. 00 15 00 .0 0 30 00 .0 0 50 00 .0 0 23 00 .0 0 T o ta l 1 2 0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 0 .0 0 1 5 0 0 .0 0 3 0 0 0 .0 0 5 0 0 0 .0 0 2 3 0 0 .0 0 A 6 .2 .1 1 : B an g la d es h A p p lie d N u tr it io n a n d H u m an R es o u rc e D ev el o p m en t B o ar d ( B IR T A N ) Li st ed e xp ec te d P ro je ct s N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 1. S tr en gt he ni ng o f Tr ai ni ng a nd R es ea rc h C ap ab ili ti es o f B IR TA N Ju ly '2 01 2 to Ju ne '2 01 6 17 60 0. 00 0. 00  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ric ul tu ra l d ev el op m en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s a. To s tr en gt he n th e m ot iv at io na l an d aw ar en es s bu ild in g a. B et te r tr ai ni ng fa ci lit ie s de ve lo pe d b. B et te r re se ar ch fa ci lit ie s de ve lo pe d c. In fr as tr uc tu re de ve lo pe d d. Ex te nt o f m al nu tr iti on re du ce d H ig h (I m m ed ia t e 1s t ye ar of M T SB P G oB 50 0. 00 25 00 .0 0 40 00 .0 0 60 00 .0 0 46 00 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 198 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 tr ai ni ng o f B IR TA N (1 0, 08 0 pe rs on s) o n fo od b as ed n ut ri ti on , fo od h yg ie ne a nd sa ni ta ti on , fo od s af et y an d nu tr it io na l se cu ri ty , po st h ar ve st te ch no lo gi es , fo od pr oc es si ng a nd pr es er va tio n, co ns eq ue nc es o f fo od ad ul te ra ti on , et c. b. To p ro vi de r es ea rc h fa ci lit ie s fo r fo od ba se d nu tr it io n to re du ce m al nu tr it io n in th e co un tr y, c. To c on st ru ct b ui ld in gs fo r th e pr oj ec t he ad of fic e, r eg io na l of fic es , re se ar ch la bo ra to ri es , tr ai ni ng ce nt er s, r es id en ti al ac co m m od at io ns , an d to d ev el op ex pe ri m en ta l fie ld s an d fa rm s fo r th e pr oj ec t im pl em en ta ti on , d. To e xt en d th e ap pl ie d nu tr it io n ed uc at io n an d tr ai ni ng p ro gr am at c om m un ity l ev el s an d in t he ed uc at io na l in st it ut io ns , e. To i m pr ov e th e nu tr it io na l st at us o f th e pe op le l iv in g in m on ga , ch ar la nd s, co as ta l be lt s, h ao r, hi ll tr ac ts , ba ri nd , e. N ut ri ti on t ra in in g an d ed uc at io n pr og ra m st re ng th en ed f. M or e nu m be r of H ig hi cs o n nu tr it io n at t he te xt b oo ks g. R ec om m en da ti on of l oc at io n w is e fo od i nt ak e ha bi t/ pa tt er n h. Le ss i nt ak e of r ic e i. M or e in ta ke o f nu tr it io na lly r ic h pu ls es , ve ge ta bl es an d fr ui ts j. M or e in ta ke o f m ea t, m ilk , eg gs an d fis he s k. B al an ce d fo od ha bi t l. M an po w er de ve lo pe d Annexes 199 N a m e o f th e P ro g ra m m e / P ro je ct s Y e a r o f st a rt in g a n d co m p le ti o n T o ta l P ro je ct co st (T k i n la k h ) E x p e n d it u re u p to J u n e 2 0 1 2 (T k i n l a k h ) D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e s a n d a ct iv it ie s D o m in a n t O u tp u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / M e d iu m / Lo w ) S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 dr ou gh t an d flo od pr on e ar ea s, t o en su re th e pr op er f oo d ba sk et , an d re co m m en d fo r ea ch of t he s pe ci fic lo ca tio ns a cc or di ng t o th e av ai la bi lit y of t he fo od i te m s gr ow n th er ei n, f. To c re at e es se nt ia l m an po w er p os ts a nd re cr ui t an d de ve lo p sk ill ed m an po w er f or ef fe ct iv e re se ar ch a nd di ss em in at io n of te ch no lo gi es o n fo od ba se d nu tr it io n. 1 7 6 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 5 0 0 .0 0 2 5 0 0 .0 0 4 0 0 0 .0 0 6 0 0 0 .0 0 4 6 0 0 .0 0 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 200 E x p e ct e d P ro je ct s (P ri o ri ty A re a w is e ) T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 A 6. 3. 1. R es ea rc h 1. D ev el op m en t of v ar ie ti es to le ra nt t o st re ss es ( e. g. dr ou gh t, s al in ity , w at er lo gg in g) 2. B io t ec hn ol og y re se ar ch 3. A gr o ec ol og ic al z on e ba se d re se ar ch 4. C lim at e ch an ge m it ig at io n/ ad ap ti ve re se ar ch 5. R es ea rc h on t he im pr ov em en t of s oi l fe rt ili ty 6. A ss es sm en t of i m pa ct ev al ua tio n on c ro p pr od uc tio n an d te ch no lo gy d ev el op m en t 7. D ev el op m en t of i nt eg ra te d pe st m an ag em en t (I PM ) 8. D ev el op m en t of q ua lit y pl an ti ng m at er ia ls 9. C on se rv at io n of s oi l, pl an t an d ge ne tic r es ou rc es 10 . Q ua lit y im pr ov em en t of ho rt ic ul tu re a nd o th er cr op s 11 . Y ie ld g ap m in im iz at io n 12 . Im pr ov em en t of q ua lit y of f oo d gr ai n an d ot he r ag ri cu lt ur al p ro du ce s w it h m or e di ge st ib le p ro te in 13 . In cr ea se i n ef fic ie nc y of w at er u se i n ri ce cu lt iv at io n 14 . In te gr at ed p la nt nu tr ie nt s sy st em a nd A ll R es ea rc h In st itu tio n un de r N A R S sy st em l ik e B R R I, B A R I, B JR I, B IN A , B SR I SR D I, un de r th e co or di na te d le ad er sh ip o f B an gl ad es h A gr ic ul tu re R es ea rc h C ou nc il (B A R C ) an d K G F  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 1. D ev el op m en t of va ri et ie s to le ra nt t o st re ss es ( e. g. dr ou gh t, s al in ity , w at er l og gi ng ) 2. B io t ec hn ol og y re se ar ch 3. A gr o ec ol og ic al z on e ba se d re se ar ch 4. C lim at e ch an ge m it ig at io n/ ad ap ti ve re se ar ch 5. A ss es sm en t of im pa ct e va lu at io n on cr op p ro du ct io n an d te ch no lo gy de ve lo pm en t 6. D ev el op m en t of in te gr at ed p es t m an ag em en t (I PM ) 7. D ev el op m en t of qu al ity p la nt in g m at er ia ls 8. Q ua lit y im pr ov em en t of h or ti cu lt ur e an d ot he r cr op s 9. C ro p zo ni ng b as ed cr op p ro du ct io n, 1. Y ie ld p er u ni t of la nd i nc re as ed . 2. E ff ic ie nt w at er u se 3. D ev el op m en t of va ri et ie s to le ra nt to s tr es se s (e .g . dr ou gh t, s al in ity , w at er l og gi ng ); 4. R ai n fe d te ch no lo gy in tr od uc ed . 5. I m pr ov ed p os t ha rv es t sy st em . 6. I nc re as ed c ro p pr od uc ti on i n hi ll ar ea s. 7. B io t ec hn ol og y re se ar ch de ve lo pm en t 8. I nc re as ed pr od uc tio n of ce re al s an d ot he r cr op s by t he de ve lo pm en t of ne w i m pr ov ed va ri et ie s; 9. L oc at io n sp ec ifi c va ri et al s de ve lo pm en t 10 . D ev el op m en t of sh or t du ra ti on , he at t ol er an t ce re al s, ve ge ta bl es , pu ls es 11 . Im pr ov ed fa rm in g sy st em H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m ) G oB + D on or 16 0. 00 24 26 .7 7 11 74 2. 44 27 85 9. 54 60 46 0. 31 Annexes 201 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 su st ai na bl e so il m an ag em en t sy st em ; 15 . Po st h ar ve st t ec hn ol og y, pr es er va tio n an d re le va nt ag ri cu lt ur al m ac hi ne ry ; 16 . H ig he r ph ot os yn th et ic ef fic ie nc y; 17 . Te ch no lo gi es f or m ax im um u se o f co m m od it ie s an d th ei r by pr od uc ts f or v al ue a dd iti on ; 18 . Fr ui ts a nd v eg et ab le s fo r of f se as on p ro du ct io n in cl ud in g pr es er va ti on , st or ab ili ty a nd t ol er an ce to t ra ns po rt at io n da m ag e 19 . D ev el op m en t of h yb ri d te ch no lo gy f or v eg et ab le s, m ai ze a nd s un flo w er s; 20 . M an ag em en t of s oi l an d pl an t nu tr ie nt s w it h ba la nc ed u se o f or ga ni c nu tr ie nt s; 21 . M an ag em en t of o n fa rm w at er r es ou rc es i n bo th ir ri ga te d an d ra in f ed ag ri cu lt ur e; 22 . C on se rv at io n of s oi l, pl an t an d ge ne tic re so ur ce s; 23 . A ss es si ng t he en vi ro nm en ta l im pa ct s of de cl in in g gr ou nd w at er le ve l; 24 . R es ea rc h on t ill ag e op er at io n to r ed uc e tu rn ar ou nd t im e, m ul ti pl e cr op pi ng a nd r el ay cr op pi ng ; pl an ni ng a nd im pl em en ta ti on 10 . C ro p di ve rs ifi ca ti on ba se d ag ro e co lo gi ca l im pa ct 11 . Y ie ld g ap m in im iz at io n 12 . Pr e ha rv es t an d po st h ar ve st lo ss m in im iz at io n 13 . R ed uc ti on o f N ut ri ti on al P ro bl em s Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 202 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 25 . R ai n fe d te ch no lo gy w it h m aj or t hr us ts o n de ve lo pm en t of c ro p cu lt iv at io n an d m an ag em en t pr ac ti ce s (e .g . ze ro /m in im um ti lla ge , re la y cr op pi ng , ap pr op ri at e pl an ti ng sc he du le a nd u se o f fe rt ili ze rs i nc lu di ng m ic ro nu tr ie nt s) 26 . D ev el op m en t an d pi lo t te st in g of d iff er en t sc al es of p ro du ce rs p ro ce ss or s ag ro b us in es s sc he m es , in cl ud in g co nt ra ct g ro w in g sc he m es 27 . M an ag em en t of h ill ag ri cu lt ur e in t he e as te rn an d so ut h ea st er n pa rt s of t he c ou nt ry 28 . G en et ic m od ifi ca ti on a nd ti ss ue c ul tu re 29 . In cr ea se i n pr od uc tio n of ce re al s an d ot he r cr op s by t he d ev el op m en t of ne w i m pr ov ed v ar ie tie s 30 . Lo ca ti on s pe ci fic v ar ie ta ls de ve lo pm en t 31 . G er m pl as m c ol le ct io n an d th ei r ut ili za ti on i n cr op i m pr ov em en t 32 . D ev el op m en t of s ho rt du ra ti on , he at t ol er an t ce re al s, v eg et ab le s, p ul se s an d oi ls ee d va rie tie s 33 . Im pr ov em en t of s oi l he al th b y or ga ni c fa rm in g 34 . Fa rm in g sy st em r es ea rc h Annexes 203 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 A 6. 3. 2. In pu t M an ag em en t 1. E ns ur in g th e su pp ly o f hi gh y ie ld in g an d hy br id se ed . 2. E ns ur in g th e su pp ly o f qu al ity f er ti liz er . 3. M od er ni za ti on o f Ir ri ga ti on m an ag em en t w ith i nf ra st ru ct ur e de ve lo pm en t. 4. I m pr ov e so il fe rt ili ty . 5. D ev el op m en t of I C T ba se d in pu t di st ri bu ti on m an ag em en t. 6. T ra in in g an d su pp or t se rv ic es f or p ri va te re se ar ch a nd d ev el op m en t, va ri et y te st in g an d re gi st ra tio n, p la nt m at er ia l in sp ec tio n an d m ai nt ai ni ng ge rm pl as m , su pp or ti ng s ee d as so ci at io ns a nd pr om ot io n of f ar m er a nd co m m un ity b as ed s ee d pr og ra m . 7. S tr en gt he ni ng a ge nc ie s in or de r to e ns ur e qu al ity o f se ed a t al l st ag es o f it s pr od uc tio n br ee de r, fo un da ti on a nd c er ti fie d se ed . 8. C re at in g fa ci lit ie s an d in fr as tr uc tu re s up po rt f or hy br id s ee d re se ar ch , m ar ke ti ng a nd de ve lo pm en t 9. T ra in in g an d te ch ni ca l as si st an ce t o fa rm er s to ex te nd i m pr ov ed m et ho ds of s ee d pr od uc tio n, te st in g an d st or ag e B A D C , D A E, B M D A , SC A  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s 1. E ns ur in g th e su pp ly of h ig h yi el di ng a nd hy br id s ee d 2. E ns ur in g th e su pp ly of q ua lit y fe rt ili ze r 3. M od er ni za ti on o f ir ri ga ti on m an ag em en t w it h in fr as tr uc tu re de ve lo pm en t 4. D ev el op m en t of I C T ba se d in pu t di st ri bu ti on m an ag em en t 5. C om m an d ar ea de ve lo pm en t ac ti vi ti es i n su rf ac e w at er i rr ig at io n pr oj ec t an d to e xp lo re ex pa ns io n of ir ri ga ti on . 1. S ee d Se ct or o f di ff er en t cr op s. 2. D ev el op ed in fr as tr uc tu re f or pr od uc tio n of hy br id s ee d. 3. D ev el op m en t of fa rm er 's kn ow le dg e re ga rd in g se ed pr od uc tio n, te st in g an d st or ag e. 4. B et te r ut ili za ti on of s ur fa ce w at er in i rr ig at io n pr oj ec ts 5. N on o ve rl ap pi ng co m m an d ar ea de ve lo pm en t. H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m ) G oB + D on or 28 0. 00 42 46 .8 5 20 54 9. 26 48 75 4. 20 10 58 05 .5 4 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 204 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 10 . C om m an d ar ea de ve lo pm en t in s ur fa ce w at er i rr ig at io n. 11 . W at er c on se rv at io n fo r ir ri ga ti on a nd o th er u se s. 12 . C lim at e ch an ge ad op ti on a nd m it ig at io n. A 6. 3. 3. Te ch no lo gy D is se m in at i on a nd m ec ha ni za ti on 1. P at ro ni zi ng m ec ha ni za ti on in a gr ic ul tu re 2. S tr en gt he ni ng r es ea rc h ex te ns io n fa rm er in ve st or m ar ke t lia is on . 3. E ns ur in g th e ex te ns io n of lo ca l ap pr op ri at e te ch no lo gy . 4. T ec hn ol og y de ve lo pm en t fo r pr od uc tio n, pr oc es si ng a nd pr es er va ti on o f qu al ity se ed i nc lu di ng h yb ri d se ed . 5. P ro m ot io n of I C T b as ed E K ri sh i. 6. A w ar en es s bu ild in g pr og ra m , tr ai ni ng , de m on st ra ti on . D A E, A IS , N A R S, B A D C  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t.  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s.  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s.  En ha nc e la nd pr od uc ti vi ty a nd pr om ot e su st ai na bl e la nd u se a nd en vi ro nm en ta l co ns er va ti on . 1. D ev el op m en t of qu al it at iv e de m on st ra ti on , fie ld da ys , ag ri cu lt ur al ex hi bi ti on . 2. D ec en tr al iz ed a nd fa rm in g sy st em ap pr oa ch t o ex te ns io n sy st em . 3. P ri or ity t o m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er s. 4. P ro m ot io n of m ec ha ni ze d ag ri cu lt ur e. 1. E nh an ce d m ec ha ni ze d fa rm in g. 2. R es ea rc h ex te ns io n fa rm er in ve st or m ar ke t lin ka ge e st ab lis he d 3. R ed uc ed p os t ha rv es t l os s. 4. D ev el op m en t of va ri et ie s to le ra nt to s tr es se s (e .g . dr ou gh t, s al in ity , w at er l og gi ng ). 5. A gr ic ul tu ra l In fo rm at io n Sy st em en ha nc ed . 6. E K ri sh i po pu la ri ze d al l ov er t he c ou nt ry . 7. Pu bl ic a w ar en es s ra is ed . 8. Im pr ov ed w ea th er fo re ca st in g te ch ni qu e. 9. A cc es si bi lit y to in fo rm at io n w ill be i nc re as ed . 10 .T ra in ed e xt en si on pe rs on ne l. H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB + D on or 16 0. 00 24 26 .7 7 11 74 2. 44 27 85 9. 54 60 46 0. 31 Annexes 205 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 5. C om m un ity s ee d pr od uc tio n, s to ra ge an d di st ri bu ti on 6. M IS ( IC T ) ba se d kn ow le dg e m an ag em en t sy st em 7. B us in es s de ve lo pm en t in it ia ti ve i n ag ri cu lt ur e es pe ci al ly ca pa ci ty b ui ld in g of ex te ns io n pe rs on ne l 8. E xp an si on o f co m m un ity b as ed e in fo rm at io n ce nt er s 9. E ff ic ie nt u ti liz at io n of m as s m ed ia ( pr in t an d el ec tr on ic m ed ia ) fo r ag ri i nf or m at io n/ te ch no lo gy di ss em in at io n. A 6. 3. 4. A gr ic ul tu ra l di ve rs ifi ca ti on & In cr ea se d C ro p pr od uc tio n 1. C ro p zo ni ng b as ed c ro p pr od uc ti on , pl an ni ng a nd im pl em en ta ti on 2. P ro pe r ut ili za ti on o f la nd in u nu se d ar ea , ch ar , ba ri nd , ha or , hi ll tr ac ts an d co as ta l ar ea s 3. C ro p di ve rs ifi ca ti on b as ed ag ro e co lo gi ca l im pa ct 4. Y ie ld g ap a nd k no w le dg e ga p m in im iz at io n 5. P re h ar ve st a nd p os t ha rv es t lo ss m in im iz at io n D A E, B R R I, B A R I, B JR I, B IN A , B SR I SR D I, B A D C , C D B  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t.  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s.  En ha nc e ac ce ss ib ili ty of a ff or da bl e in pu ts an d cr ed it t o fa rm er s. 1. T o at ta in s el f su ff ic ie nc y in f oo d gr ai n pr od uc tio n al on g w it h in cr ea se d pr od uc tio n of o th er nu tr it io na l cr op s; 1. S el f su ff ic ie nc y in fo od g ra in at ta in ed . 2. I nc om e of fa rm er s ro se . 3. P ro du ct io n of H Y V i nc re as ed . 4. I nc re as ed u se o f su rf ac e w at er f or ir ri ga ti on . 5. Y ie ld g ap m in im iz at io n. 6. C om m er ci al fa rm in g pr om ot ed . 7. D ec en tr al iz ed ex te ns io n sy st em in tr od uc ed . H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m ) G oB + D on or 12 0. 00 18 20 .0 8 88 06 .8 3 20 89 4. 66 45 34 5. 23 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 206 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 2. I nc re as e pr od uc tiv ity an d re al i nc om e of fa rm in g fa m ili es i n ru ra l ar ea s on su st ai na bl e ba si s; 3. T o pr om ot e ad op tio n of m od er n ag ri cu lt ur al pr ac ti ce s in d ro ug ht , su bm er ge nc e an d sa lin e pr on e ar ea s to en co ur ag e re se ar ch on a da pt at io n to cl im at e ch an ge ; 4. T o gr ad ua lly s hi ft t he m ai n H Y V, i rr ig at io n fe d B or o ri ce pr od uc tio n to t he So ut he rn a re as a nd to u ti liz e ne w s al in ity , su bm er ge nc e, a nd ot he r St re ss t ol er an t va ri et ie s an d al so t o ut ili ze a bu nd an t su rf ac e w at er f or ir ri ga ti on ; 5. P ro pe r us e of ge ne ti ca lly m od ifi ed te ch no lo gy i n ag ri cu lt ur e; 6. U ti liz e ab un da nt su rf ac e w at er f or ir ri ga ti on ; 7. U ti liz e th e ir ri ga te d no rt h ea st er n up la nd s to g ro w m or e hi gh va lu e ca sh c ro ps l ik e w he at , m ai ze , co rn et c. a nd h or ti cu lt ur e pr od uc ts ; Annexes 207 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 8. T o em ph as iz e on y ie ld ga p re du ct io n an d al so t o em ph as iz e on m ax im iz at io n of y ie ld in A us a nd A m an cr op s w it h si m ila r ca re a s th e B or o cu lt iv at io n fo r en su ri ng s el f su ff ic ie nc y in f oo d gr ai n; 9. T o st re ng th en f ar m in g sy st em /c ro pp in g sy st em /w ho le f ar m ap pr oa ch b as ed te ch no lo gy t ra ns fe r 10 . In cr ea se p ro du ct io n of j ut e, m ea su re s ha ve t o be t ak en t o im pr ov e ju te v ar ie ty an d re tt in g sy st em t o ob ta in q ua lit y fib er s; 11 . To i nc lu de o il cr op s an d sp ic es f or in cr ea se d pr od uc tio n 12 . Pr om ot io n of p ul se cr op ; 13 . To b ri ng c oa st al a nd hi lly a re as u nd er in te ns iv e cu lt iv at io n; 14 . En co ur ag e co m pa ra tiv el y la rg e fa rm t o gr ad ua te i nt o co m m er ci al f ar m in g; 15 . To p ro m ot e th e us e of m od er n te ch no lo gi es w it h th e he lp o f IC T; Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 208 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 16 . To s tr en gt he n ag ri cu lt ur al m ec ha ni za ti on f or en ha nc in g pr od uc tio n; 17 . To d ev el op c ro p zo ni ng m ar ke t ba se d ag ri cu lt ur e on t he ba si s of A EZ . 18 . To s tr en gt he n de ce nt ra liz ed kn ow le dg e ba se d ex te ns io n sy st em . A 6. 3. 5. A gr ic ul tu re M ar ke ti ng an d C om m er ci a l Fa rm in g 1. C om m er ci al iz at io n of ag ri cu lt ur e m ar ke ti ng . 2. W ho le sa le m ar ke t de ve lo pm en t, p ro m ot io n of a gr o pr oc es si ng in du st ri es , m ar ke t m an ag em en t. 3. I m pr ov em en t of s to ra ge fa ci lit ie s, p ar ti cu la rl y fo r m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er s. 4. D ev el op m en t of I C T ba se d m ar ke t m an ag em en t. 5. P ri or it iz at io n of pr od uc tio n of h ig h va lu e cr op s. 6. D ev el op m en t of pu bl ic /p ri va te a gr o in du st ri es . D A M a nd H or te x  Pr om ot e m ar ke t ac ce ss a nd p ro du ct de ve lo pm en t fo r cr op s.  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t. 1. D A M w ill b e st re ng th en ed t o pr ov id e im pr ov ed m ar ke ti ng s er vi ce s. 2. W ho le sa le m ar ke t de ve lo pm en t, pr om ot io n of a gr o pr oc es si ng i nd us tr ie s, m ar ke t m an ag em en t, cr ea tio n of M IS i n D A M , cl as si fic at io n, gr ad in g an d st an da rd iz at io n of ag ri cu lt ur al p ro du ct s, im pr ov em en t of st or ag e fa ci lit ie s, pa rt ic ul ar ly f or m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er s. 1. W ho le sa le m ar ke t de ve lo pe d. 2. G ro w er s se lli ng th ei r pr od uc ts w it h fa ir r et ur ns . 3. M IS d ev el op m en t of D A M . 4. I m pr ov ed m ar ke ti ng fa ci lit ie s fo r m ar gi na l an d sm al l fa rm er s. 5. P er fo rm an ce o f ag ro p ro ce ss in g in du st ri es en ha nc ed . H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m w it hi n 5t h ye ar o f M T SB P) G oB + D on or 40 .0 0 60 6. 69 29 35 .6 1 69 64 .8 9 15 11 5. 08 Annexes 209 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 3. M od er ni za ti on a nd m ec ha ni za ti on o f fo od s to ra ge s ys te m al on g w it h m od er n w ei gh in g an d ba gg in g, c on ve yo rs fo r ae ra ti on , ad eq ua te d ry in g sy st em , en to le te rs et c. i s ne ed ed i n or de r to e nh an ce ef fic ie nt h an dl in g an d di st ri bu ti on o f fo od gr ai n, a nd i nc re as e sh el f lif e an d m ai nt ai n qu al ity . 4. C ap ac ity B ui ld in g of H or te x Fo un da ti on t o pr om ot e ag ro pr oc es si ng i nd us tr ie s. A 6. 3. 6. In st it ut io na l & H um an R es ou rc e D ev el op m en t 1. S tr en gt he ni ng r es ea rc h ex te ns io n fa rm er in ve st or m ar ke t lia is on . 2. D ev el op m en t of t ra in ed m an po w er . 3. D ev el op t he e ff ic ie nc y of m an po w er o f di ff er en t or ga ni za tio ns u nd er M in is tr y of A gr ic ul tu re . 4. D ev el op m en t of I C T i n ev er y se ct or o f im pl em en ti ng a ge nc ie s in cl ud in g M in is tr y of A gr ic ul tu re . 5. I ns ti tu ti on al c ap ac ity de ve lo pm en t to p ro m ot e Pu bl ic P ri va te p ar tn er sh ip . 6. S te ps t o be t ak en t o en su re t he a va ila bi lit y of l ab or . M in is tr y of A gr ic ul tu re (M oA ) an d al l im pl em en ti ng ag en ci es  C re at e en ab lin g en vi ro nm en t fo r ag ri cu lt ur al de ve lo pm en t  En ha nc e pr od uc tio n an d pr od uc ti vi ty o f cr op s 1. D ev el op m en t of qu al it at iv e de m on st ra ti on , fie ld da ys , ag ri cu lt ur al ex hi bi ti on ; 2. S tr en gt he ni ng o f fie ld le ve l ac ti vi ti es th ro ug h pr op er de le ga ti on o f au th or ity f ro m he ad qu ar te rs t o fie ld le ve l; 1. L in ki ng w it h "D ig it al B an gl ad es h Se cr et ar ia t" es ta bl is he d 2. E G ov er na nc e en ha nc ed . 3. A ll th e ag en ci es un de r m in is tr y is co nn ec te d to a co m m on ne tw or k. 4. K no w le dg e ga p at ex te ns io n ag en ts an d fa rm er s le ve l m in im iz ed . 5. P er fo rm an ce o f ag ro p ro ce ss in g in du st ri es im pr ov ed . H ig h (M id t o lo ng t er m ) G oB 40 .0 0 60 6. 69 29 35 .6 1 69 64 .8 9 15 11 5. 08 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 210 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 7. E st ab lis hm en t of s m al l fa rm er s a nd tr ai ni ng in st it ut e to t ra in l oc al fa rm er s 3. B us in es s de ve lo pm en t in it ia ti ve i n ag ri cu lt ur e es pe ci al ly ca pa ci ty b ui ld in g of ex te ns io n pe rs on ne l. 4. E st ab lis hm en t of A T Is to m ee t th e gr ow in g ne ed s of e xt en si on pe rs on ne l in cl ud in g w om en e xt en si on ag en ts . 5. E m ph as iz e AT Is a nd C ER D I to p ro vi de tr ai ni ng i n ag ri cu lt ur al m an ag em en t, in st ru ct io n in t he pr od uc ti on o f tr ai ni ng m at er ia ls , tr ai ni ng o f tr ai ne rs a nd o f ex te ns io n ag en ts . 6. T o m in im iz e in fo rm at io n ga p. 7. M od er n IC T t oo ls f or ag ri cu lt ur al in fo rm at io n di ss em in at io n th ro ug h de ve lo pm en t of r eg io na l pr in ti ng fa ci lit ie s. 8. K no w le dg e di ss em in at io n to st re ng th en r es ea rc h ex te ns io n fa rm er in ve st or m ar ke t lia is on . 9. D ev el op in g IC T in fr as tr uc tu re f ac ili tie s an d ex pa ns io n of co nn ec ti vi ty . 6. W el l co or di na te d fie ld l ev el ac ti vi ti es . 7. E st ab lis hm en t of tr ai ni ng i ns ti tu te fo r sm al l an d m ar gi na l fa rm er . 8. I nt en si ve t ra in in g fo r ex te ns io n ag en ts . 40 .0 0 60 6. 69 29 35 .6 1 69 64 .8 9 15 11 5. 08 Annexes 211 T h e m a ti c A re a P ro je ct / P ri o ri ty A re a Im p le m e n ti n g A g e n cy D o m in a n t st ra te g ic o b je ct iv e D o m in a n t o u t p u t P ri o ri ty (H ig h / m e d iu m / l o w a n d p ro b a b le ye a r o f st a rt in g S o u rc e s o f F in a n ci n g 2 0 1 2 1 3 Y e a r w is e P ro je ct c o st ( T k i n l a k h ) 2 0 1 3 1 4 2 0 1 4 1 5 2 0 1 5 1 6 2 0 1 6 1 7 10 . Tr an sf or m in g tr ad it io na l fil e ba se d ad m in is tr at iv e w or k in t he p ub lic s ec to r in to e g ov er nm en t/ di gi ta l go ve rn m en t fo r be tt er a nd ef fic ie nt s er vi ce s to th e pe op le 11 . IC T t ra in in g to M in is tr y an d ag en cy le ve l 40 .0 0 60 6. 69 29 35 .6 1 69 64 .8 9 15 11 5. 08 8 0 0 .0 0 T o ta l E x p e ct e d P ro je ct s (P ri o ri ty A re a W is e ) 1 2 1 3 3 .8 6 5 8 7 1 2 .1 8 1 3 9 2 9 7 .7 1 3 0 2 3 0 1 .5 4 Annexes 213 Annex-7 Department/Agency Wise Annual Performance Plans26 A 7.1: Secretariat: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets 26 In the MTSBP, Department/Agency Wise Annual Performance Plans have been made mostly on the basis of 2012-13 Ministry Budget Framework information. Any change/revision will be reflected in the revised document. Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit ofmeas ureme nt Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Preparation of MBF Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2. Publication of Annual Report Annual Report published 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3. Amendment of NAP NAP amended 1 4. Enactment of new Act, say on agriculture FDI 1 5. Review and updating of MTSBP 1 6. ADP Monitoring and Evaluation Report for the MOA 7. Annual Financial Report of the MOA 8. Strengthening MIS 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Preparation of MBF Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2. Publication of Annual Report Annual Report published 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3. Amendment of NAP NAP amended 1 4. Enactment of new Act, say on agriculture FDI 1 5. Review and updating of MTSBP 1 6. ADP Monitoring and Evaluation Reportrr for the MOA 7. Annual Financial Report of the MOA 8. Strengthening MIS 1 1 1 1 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit ofmeas ureme nt Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategi c Objectiv es Unit ofmeasure ment Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Farmers trained Lakh 7.15 7.42 8.00 7.50 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.25 Exhibitions conducted Lakh 1.35 1.33 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.52 1.58 Field days/rallies organized Number (in thousands) 32.15 29.05 30.50 29.20 29.70 30.0 0 30.50 30.50 30.50 Agriculture Fairs conducted Number 238 238 540 529 530 550 550 570 580 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, demonstrations, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Motivation Tours conducted 1 Number 141 142 250 280 386 350 370 400 420 2. Provision of E agriculture based information services Computers distributed and internet access provided to “Upazilas” 1 Number of beneficiaries 133 133 194 194 200 250 300 325 350 3. Ensuring supply of fertilizers and other inputs at administered prices Fertilizer distribution Inspected 1 Number (inspection) 235 237 239 241 243 244 245 246 247 A 7.2: Department of Agricultural Extension: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 214 4. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Foundation, certified seeds distributed 1 Metric Ton (in thousands) 1.36 1.26 1.30 1.34 1.31 1.32 1.32 1.34 1.35 5. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence Foundation seed of paddy Distributed 1 Metric Ton 360 360 400 400 410 415 420 400 410 6. Extension of soil testing facilities to Upazila and Union lebel. Soil samples analyzed 2 Number (in thousands) 53.00 53.97 54.00 50.00 45.00 46.0 0 47.00 48.00 50.00 Heaps prepared at farmers’ homesteads Lakh 20.0 19.8 16.0 15.5 15.5 14.5 15.5 1.20 1.10 7. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green manure and bio fertilizer Demonstration of green manure conducted 2 Number ( in thousands) 5.80 5.68 5.60 5.60 5.80 6.00 6.20 6.30 6.40 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Trained Farmers 1 Person (in thousands) 18.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 Expanded irrigation area Lakh Hector 5.35 5.35 5.70 5.70 6.00 6.50 6.85 7.00 7.15 2. Expansion of minor irrigation coverage by encouraging optimal use of surface water, increasing the area of arable land by reducing water logging and sub mergence Increased arable land 1 Hector( in thousands) 97.00 97.70 89.00 89.60 90.00 90.50 90.60 90.70 90.80 3. Procurement of irrigation machinery and increasing its availability Machinery items procured 1 Number (in thousands) 1.90 1.90 0.99 0.99 1.53 1.55 1.60 1.63 1.70 4. Ensuring the supply of fertilizers and other inputs at administered prices Non-urea fertilizer distributed 1 Lakh Metric Ton 5.09 5.09 7.00 7.00 9.50 10.50 12.00 13.50 15.00 5. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Produced seeds 1 Lakh Metric Ton 1.43 1.07 1.54 1.27 1.36 1.45 1.53 1.59 1.64 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Trained Farmers 1 Person (in thousands) 18.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 Expanded irrigation area Lakh Hector 5.35 5.35 5.70 5.70 6.00 6.50 6.85 7.00 7.15 2. Expansion of minor irrigation coverage by encouraging optimal use of surface water, increrr asing the arerr a of arable land by rerr ducing waww ter logging and sub mergrr ence Increased arable land 1 Hector( in thousands) 97.00 97.70 89.00 89.60 90.00 90.50 90.60 90.70 90.80 3. Procurement of irrigation machinery and increasing its availability Machinery items procured 1 Number (in thousands) 1.90 1.90 0.99 0.99 1.53 1.55 1.60 1.63 1.70 4. Ensuring the supply of fertilizers and other inputs at administered prices Non-urea fertilizer distributed 1 Lakh Metric Ton 5.09 5.09 7.00 7.00 9.50 10.50 12.00 13.50 15.00 5. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Produced seeds 1 Lakh Metric Ton 1.43 1.07 1.54 1.27 1.36 1.45 1.53 1.59 1.64 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 A 7.3: Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Annexes 215 6. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence Produced seeds 1 Metric Ton (in thousands) - 1.60 1.60 2.40 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 7. Encouraging participation of the private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange Arranged meeting/ seminar 1 Number 25 25 25 25 30 35 40 40 45 6. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence Produced seeds 1 Metric Ton (in thousands) - 1.60 1.60 2.40 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 7. Encouraging participation of the private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange Arranged meeting/ seminar 1 Number 25 25 25 25 30 35 40 40 45 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Innovated varieties of paddy and other crops 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of different crops, and technologies 1 Number 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2. Innovation of salinity, drought and water submergence tolerant technologies and varieties of rice and other crops Salinity, drought and water submergence resistant crop varieties developed and technologies innovated 1 Number 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Trained farmers 2.20 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 3. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Field demonstration 1 Number (in thousands) 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 4. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Produced and distributed breeder seeds 1 Metric Ton 125.00 115.31 130.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 140.00 145.00 150.00 5. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, draught and water submergence Produced and distributed breeder seeds 1 Metric Ton 15.00 15.00 20.00 17.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 6. Encouraging the participation of private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange. Technologies transferred 1 Number 24 22 24 24 25 26 27 28 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Innovated varieties of paddy and other crops 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of diffff erent crops, and technologies 1 Number 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2. Innovation of salinity, drought and water submergence tolerant technologies and varieties of rice and other crops Salinity, drought and water submergence resistant crop varieties developed and technologies innovated 1 Number 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Trained farmers 2.20 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 3. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Field demonstration 1 Number (in thousands) 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 4. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Produced and distributed breeder seeds 1 Metric Ton 125.00 115.31 130.00 125.00 130.00 135.00 140.00 145.00 150.00 5. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, draught and water submergence Produced and distributed breeder seeds 1 Metric Ton 15.00 15.00 20.00 17.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 6. Encouraging the participation of private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange. Technologies transferred 1 Number 24 22 24 24 25 26 27 28 30 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Innovated agriculture technologies A 7.4: Bangladesh Rice Research Institute: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 216 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Innovated varieties 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of different crops, and technologies Innovated technologies 1 Number - 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Number (Batch) 125 125 125 125 150 200 250 300 350 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Farmers trained 1 Person (in thousands) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 3. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Produced breeder and truthfully level seeds 1 Metric ton (in thousands) 1.20 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.40 1.50 4. Encouraging the participation of private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange. Memorandum of Understandin g signed 1 Number - - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Books and leaflets distributed - 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 5. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer Crop pattern based on organic fertilizer 2 Number - 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Innovated varieties 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of diffff erent crops, and technologies Innovated technologies 1 Number - 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Number (Batch) 125 125 125 125 150 200 250 300 350 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Farmers trained 1 Person (in thousands) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 3. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Produced breeder and truthfully level seeds 1 Metric ton (in thousands) 1.20 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.40 1.50 4. Encouraging the participation of private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange. Memorandum of Understandin g signed 1 Number - - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Books and leaflets distributed - 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 5. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer Crop pattern based on organic fertilizer 2 Number - 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 A 7.5: Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Innovated new varieties of jute 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of different crops, and technologies. Innovated technology 1 Number 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Training provided 1 Number (in thousands) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Innovated new varieties of jute 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of diffff erent crops, and technologies. Innovated technology 1 Number 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Training provided 1 Number (in thousands) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 A 7.6: Bangladesh Jute Research Institute: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Annexes 217 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit ofmeasure ment Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Innovated varieties of paddy and wheat 3 3 5 5 5 4 6 5 6 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of different crops, and technologies Innovated varieties of pulse, oil seed, vegetable, fruit and spices 1 Number 4 4 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 2. Innovation of salinity, drought and water submergence tolerant technologies and varieties of rice and other crops Innovation of BINA-- 8 (tolerant to salinity) and BINA 9(tolerant to submergence) 1 Number 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Training 1 Person (in thousand) 1.60 1.55 1.65 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.75 1.80 1.80 3. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications 1 Number (in thousand) 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 4. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Seeds produced and distributed 1 Metric ton 100 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 5. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence Seeds distributed 1 Metric ton 10 10 15 15 20 20 20 25 25 Microbe fertilizer produced Metric ton 2 2 5 5 6 6 7 8 8 6. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer Innovated varieties of microbe fertilizer developed 1 Number 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Innovated varieties of paddy and wheat 3 3 5 5 5 4 6 5 6 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of diffff erent crops, and technologies Innovated varieties of pulse, oil seed, vegetable, fruit and spices 1 Number 4 4 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 2. Innovation of salinity, drought and water submergence tolerant technologies and varieties of rice and other crops Innovation of BINA-- 8 (tolerant to salinity) and BINA 9(tolerant to submergence) 1 Number 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Trarr ining 1 Person (in thousand) 1.60 1.55 1.65 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.75 1.80 1.80 3. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications 1 Number (in thousand) 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 4. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Seeds produced and distributed 1 Metric ton 100 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 5. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence Seeds distributed 1 Metric ton 10 10 15 15 20 20 20 25 25 Microbe fertilizer produced Metric ton 2 2 5 5 6 6 7 8 8 6. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer Innovated varieties of microbe fertilizer developed 1 Number 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit ofmeasure ment Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Block and experimental exhibitions organized A 7.7: Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Produced breeder seeds Kilogram (in thousands) 2.82 2.82 2.95 2.95 3.00 3.10 3.25 3.50 3.50 3. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Produced truthfully lebel seeds 1 Metric ton 86 86 100 100 100 100 110 115 120 Memorandum of understanding signed 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 4. Encourage participation of the private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange Fairs organized 1 Number 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Produced breeder seeds Kilogram (in thousands) 2.82 2.82 2.95 2.95 3.00 3.10 3.25 3.50 3.50 3. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Produced truthfully lebel seeds 1 Metric ton 86 86 100 100 100 100 110 115 120 Memorandum of understanding signed 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 4. Encourage participation of the private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange Fairs organized 1 Number 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 218 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit ofmeasure ment Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of different crops, and technologies Innovated varieties developed 1 Number 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 Farmers trained Person (in thousands) 1.30 1.28 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.85 1.90 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Block Exhibitions organized 1 Number 270 268 280 493 500 535 550 580 600 3. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Seeds produced 1 Metric ton 300 300 350 320 360 370 390 400 420 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of diffff erent crops, and technologies Innovated varieties developed 1 Number 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 Farmers trained Person (in thousands) 1.30 1.28 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.85 1.90 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Block Exhibitions organized 1 Number 270 268 280 493 500 535 550 580 600 3. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Seeds produced 1 Metric ton 300 300 350 320 360 370 390 400 420 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit ofmeasure ment Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 A 7.8: Bangladesh Sugarcane Research Institute: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Farmers trained Person (in thousands) 7.00 5.50 5.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.20 6.50 7.30 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Plot exhibitions organized 1 Number (plot) 100 150 150 260 175 170 160 150 145 Excavated canal Kilometer - - 35 35 250 250 250 215 230 Cross dams constructed - 5 5 60 70 70 35 40 Rubber dams constructed - - - 1 1 2 1 3 Ponds re excavated - - - 200 200 260 200 230 Dug wells excavated Number - 40 40 30 30 32 35 42 2. Expansion of minor irrigation coverage by encouraging optimal use of surface water, and increasing the area of arable land by reducing water logging and sub-mergence Area covered under complementar y irrigation 1 Hector (in thousands) - 1.75 1.75 12.50 12.50 12.50 13.00 13.20 Deep tube well Installed and connected to electricity 800 800 460 500 650 675 700 725 750 Energy driven pump used Number - - 20 50 50 70 75 3. Procurement of irrigation machineries and increasing its availability Irrigation machinery under pre-paid meter system 1 Number (in thousands) - - - 1.00 2.00 1.50 1.55 1.60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Farmers trained Person (in thousands) 7.00 5.50 5.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.20 6.50 7.30 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Plot exhibitions organized 1 Number (plot) 100 150 150 260 175 170 160 150 145 Excavated canal Kilometer - - 35 35 250 250 250 215 230 Cross dams constructed - 5 5 60 70 70 35 40 Rubber dams constructed - - - 1 1 2 1 3 Ponds re excavated - - - 200 200 260 200 230 Dug wells excavated Number - 40 40 30 30 32 35 42 2. Expansion of minor irrigation coverage by encouraging optimal use of surface water, and increrr asing the arerr a of arable land by rerr ducing waww ter logging and sub-mergrr ence Area covered under complementar y irrigation 1 Hector (in thousands) - 1.75 1.75 12.50 12.50 12.50 13.00 13.20 Deep tube well Installed and connected to electricity 800 800 460 500 650 675 700 725 750 Energy driven pump used Number - - 20 50 50 70 75 3. Procurement of irrigation machineries and increasing its availability Irrigation machinery under pre-paid meter system 1 Number (in thousands) - - - 1.00 2.00 1.50 1.55 1.60 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 A 7.9: Barend Multipurpose Development Authority: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Annexes 219 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit ofmeasure ment Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 New research action plans prepared 30 28 32 32 35 37 37 39 38 New research proposals approved Number 35 35 40 34 40 40 40 40 40 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of different crops, and technologies. New research proposals funded 1 Taka in crore 0.85 0.65 1.40 1.30 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Farmers trained 1 Person 36 35 40 40 42 44 46 48 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 New research action plans prepared 30 28 32 32 35 37 37 39 38 New research proposals approved Number 35 35 40 34 40 40 40 40 40 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of diffff erent crops, and technologies. New research proposals funded 1 Taka in crore 0.85 0.65 1.40 1.30 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Farmers trained 1 Person 36 35 40 40 42 44 46 48 50 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit ofmeasure ment Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 A 7.10: Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of different crops, and technologies. Innovation of varieties 1 Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Farmers training course 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 Participants Number 18.00 15.82 19.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 16.00 27.00 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Exhibition and trial 1 Number (in thousands) 57 55 60 55 65 70 75 80 85 3. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Production and distribution of truthfully lebel seeds 1 Metric ton 220 130 225 200 220 240 260 280 300 Workshop 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4. Encouraging the participation of the private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange Meeting/ Seminar 1 Number 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 5. Marketing and ginning of cotton seeds Cotton seeds ginned 1 Metric ton 325 182 425 300 450 475 500 525 550 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Innovation of high yielding varieties of diffff erent crops, and technologies. Innovation of varieties 1 Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Farmers training course 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 Participants Number 18.00 15.82 19.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 16.00 27.00 2. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Exhibition and trial 1 Number (in thousands) 57 55 60 55 65 70 75 80 85 3. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Production and distribution of truthfully lebel seeds 1 Metric ton 220 130 225 200 220 240 260 280 300 Workshop 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 44. Encouraging the participation of the private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange Meeting/ Seminar 1 Number 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 5. Marketing and ginning of cotton seeds Cotton seeds ginned 1 Metric ton 325 182 425 300 450 475 500 525 550 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Unit of measurement Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 A 7.11: Cotton Development Board: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 220 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Trained Farmers 1 Person 450 400 450 450 400 450 500 550 600 Amount of certified paddy seeds-45 30 30 70 65 100 110 120 130 140 Wheat-3 2.5 2.5 4 4 5 6 8 9 10 Potato-2 1.8 1.8 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jute-13 4 4 4 4 5 6 7 8 10 2. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Jute-13 2 Metric ton 4 4 4 4 5 6 7 8 10 3. Production, certification and distribution breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence Breeder seeds certified 2 Metric ton(in lakh) 4.16 4.17 4,18 5.00 5.17 6.17 7.18 8.18 10.20 4. Ensuring the standardization of seeds Seed samples examined 2 Metric ton(in thousands) 25.50 35.29 26.96 38.82 46.97 51.00 56.00 62.00 65.00 5. Encouraging participation of the private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange. Participants of Workshop, Field day, Seminars 2 Person (in thousands) 1.00 .60 1.00 1.20 2.00 2.50 2.60 2.80 2.80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Trained Farmers 1 Person 450 400 450 450 400 450 500 550 600 Amount of certified paddy seeds-45 30 30 70 65 100 110 120 130 140 Wheat-3 2.5 2.5 4 4 5 6 8 9 10 Potato-2 1.8 1.8 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jute-13 4 4 4 4 5 6 7 8 10 2. Production, certification and distribution of breeder, foundation, certified and truthfully lebel seeds Jute-13 2 Metric ton 4 4 4 4 5 6 7 8 10 3. Production, certification and distribution breeder, foundation and truthfully lebel seeds tolerant to salinity, drought and water submergence Breeder seeds certified 2 Metric ton(in lakh) 4.16 4.17 4,18 5.00 5.17 6.17 7.18 8.18 10.20 4. Ensuring the standardization of seeds Seed samples examined 2 Metric ton(in thousands) 25.50 35.29 26.96 38.82 46.97 51.00 56.00 62.00 65.00 5. Encouraging participation of the private sector in production and development of seeds through meetings, seminars, fairs and technology exchange. Participants of Workshop, Field day, Seminars 2 Person (in thousands) 1.00 .60 1.00 1.20 2.00 2.50 2.60 2.80 2.80 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Unit of measurement A 7.12: Seed Certification Agency: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Annexes 221 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Trained farmers Number (in thousands) 2.00 2.00 2.20 2.20 2.40 2.40 2.48 2.60 2.60 Poster printed and distributed 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 Booklet printed and distributed 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Leaflet printed and distributed 1 Number (in thousands) 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 Video/ Film filler made and displayed 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 Advertisement in Television and Radio 10 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 14 Cinema show Number 50 50 55 55 60 65 70 70 70 Online agriculture technology transfer Number (in thousands) - 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 Agriculture information service at finger touch - 1 1 3 3 4 4 4 Updated Website - 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 E- Book 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Broadcasted “Mati o Manush” Program 100 100 104 104 100 108 110 110 110 2. Provision of E agriculture based information services Talk show 1 Number 40 40 41 41 45 45 50 50 50 Film Filler 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 Video footage Number 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 Poster 50i 50 50 50 55 i 55 60 60 60 Booklet 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 Leaflet Number (in thousands) 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 3. Increasing awareness about food value and nutrition through publications, meetings and workshops Cinema show 1 Number 840 840 840 840 810 820 830 830 830 Establishment of Community Radio 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Documentary prepared 10 10 12 12 15 16 18 20 20 4. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer Fillers prepared 2 Number 10 10 13 13 15 20 20 20 20 Database on agriculture market related information 10 10 12 12 16 17 18 19 20 Online information covering agriculture market related issues 10 10 12 12 16 17 18 19 20 5. Publicity and preservation of information on agricultural marketing and development Farmers database 3 Number 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Trained farmers Number (in thousands) 2.00 2.00 2.20 2.20 2.40 2.40 2.48 2.60 2.60 Poster printed and distributed 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 Booklet printed and distributed 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Leaflet printed and distributed 1 Number (in thousands) 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 Video/ Film filler made and displayed 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 Advertisement in Television and Radio 10 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 14 Cinema show Number 50 50 55 55 60 65 70 70 70 Online agriculture technology transfer Number (in thousands) - 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 Agriculture information service at finger touch - 1 1 3 3 4 4 4 Updated Website - 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 E- Book 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Broadcasted “Mati o Manush” Program 100 100 104 104 100 108 110 110 110 2. Provision of E agriculture based information services Talk show 1 Number 40 40 41 41 45 45 50 50 50 Film Filler 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 Video foff otage Number 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 Poster 50i 50 50 50 55 i 55 60 60 60 Booklet 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 Leaflet Number (in thousands) 50 50 50 50 55 55 60 60 60 3. Increasing awareness about food value and nutrition through publications, meetings and workshops Cinema show 1 Number 840 840 840 840 810 820 830 830 830 Establishment of Community Radio 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Documentary prepared 10 10 12 12 15 16 18 20 20 4. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer Fillers prepared 2 Number 10 10 13 13 15 20 20 20 20 Database on agriculture market related information 10 10 12 12 16 17 18 19 20 Online information covering agriculture market related issues 10 10 12 12 16 17 18 19 20 5. Publicity and preservation of information on agricultural marketing and development Farmers database 3 Number 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Unit of measurement A 7.13: Agricultural Information Services: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 222 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Publish market price in Website 1 417 417 417 417 417 417 417 417 417 1. Publicity and preservation of information on agricultural marketing and development Publish Bulletin 3 Number 300 317 320 325 327 328 330 332 340 Construction of Market, Assembling centre, Cool chamber and processing centre 106 106 106 106 156 156 156 156 156 Market infrastructure constructed/ repaired Number 1 1 6 0 6 7 8 9 10 2. Development and maintenance of market infrastructure and provide other supports Farmers marketing group, processing group and farmers group 3 Number (in thousands) 1.09 1.09 1.15 1.15 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Entrepreneurs hip created Person (in thousands) 30.54 30.54 32.00 32.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 3. Providing technological support and technical assistance to agricultural entrepreneurs and encouraging them invest in agro-processing and agro-business Establish training cum agro processing centre 3 Number 10 10 10 10 14 14 14 14 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Publish market price in Website 1 417 417 417 417 417 417 417 417 417 1. Publicity and preservation of information on agricultural marketing and development Publish Bulletin 3 Number 300 317 320 325 327 328 330 332 340 Construction of Market, Assembling centre, Cool chamber and processing centre 106 106 106 106 156 156 156 156 156 Market infrastructure constructed/ repaired Number 1 1 6 0 6 7 8 9 10 2. Development and maintenance of market infrastructure and provide other supports Farmers marketing group, processing group and farmers group 3 Number (in thousands) 1.09 1.09 1.15 1.15 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Entrepreneurs hip created Person (in thousands) 30.54 30.54 32.00 32.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 3. Providing technological support and technical assistance to agricultural entrepreneurs and encouraging them invest in agro-processing and agro-business Establish training cum agro processing centre 3 Number 10 10 10 10 14 14 14 14 14 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Unit of measurement A 7.14: Department of Agricultural Marketing: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Field surveys undertaken 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 50 55 1. Identification of soil and land resources through soil survey and classification of land and soil resources in terms of their productivity Upazilla directories printed Number 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 50 55 2. Extension of soil test facilities to Upazila and Union level Soil samples analyzed Number 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 3. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer Farmers trained 2 Number (in thousands) 12.00 12.00 7.00 7.50 0.30 0.50 0.70 0.90 1.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Field surveys undertaken 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 50 55 1. Identification of soil and land resources through soil survey and classification of land and soil resources in terms of their productivity Upazilla directories printed Number 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 50 55 2. Extension of soil test facilities to Upazila and Union level Soil samples analyzed Number 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 40.00 50.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 3. Popularize among the farmers the use of organic fertilizer, green fertilizer and microbe fertilizer Farmers trained 2 Number (in thousands) 12.00 12.00 7.00 7.50 0.30 0.50 0.70 0.90 1.00 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Unit of measurement A7.15 Soil Resource Development Institute: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Annexes 223 Medium Term Targets Activities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Farmers, school teachers, social workers and others trained 1 Personin thousands) 3.60 3.21 4.00 3.60 4.15 4.20 4.30 4.50 4.65 Workshops organized 4 2 8 6 8 9 10 10 10 Short stories, forecast through Radio 24 14 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2. Increasing awareness about food value and nutrition through publications, meetings and workshops Fairs organized 1 Number 8 6 8 8 8 10 12 12 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. Promotion of use of innovated varieties and technologies by farmers through training, exhibitions, fairs, rallies, seminars, workshops and publications Farmers, school teachers, social workers and others trained 1 Personin thousands) 3.60 3.21 4.00 3.60 4.15 4.20 4.30 4.50 4.65 Workshops organized 4 2 8 6 8 9 10 10 10 Short stories, forecast through Radio 24 14 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 2. Increasing awareness about food value and nutrition through publications, meetings and workshops Fairs organized 1 Number 8 6 8 8 8 10 12 12 12 Medium Term TargetsActivities Output Indicator Related Strategic Objectives Revised Target 2010-11 Actual 2010-11 Target 2011-12 Revised Target 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Unit of measurement A 7.16: Bangladesh Applied Nutrition and Human Resource Development Board: Activities, Output Indicators and Targets Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan 224 Allen, Richard and Daniel Tommasi(2001) Managing Public Expenditure- A Reference Book for Transition Countries, pp.1-497, OECD, 2001. Asian Development Bank (2011)Bangladesh Country Table, inKey Indicators for Asia and Pacific,ADB, Philippines, August 2011. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2011) 2010 Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh, Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, August 2011. www.bbs.gov.bd Bangladesh, Government of People’s Republic (2011a) Sixth Five Year Plan FY2011 FY2015,Accelerating Growth and Reducing Poverty, Part-1: Strategic Directions and Policy Framework, pp.1-256; Part-2: Sectoral Strategies, Programs and Policies, pp.1-496, July 2011. , (2011b) Bangladesh Country Investment Plan, A Road Map Towards Investment in Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition, pp.1-158,Ministry of Food and Disaster Management, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, June 2011. , (2011c) Third Primary Education Development Programme (PEDP3) – Main Programme Document, Implementation Guide and Annexes,pp.1-392, Directorate of Primary Education, Ministry of Primary and Mass Education, June 2011. , (2011d)Strategic Plan for Health, Population and Nutrition Sector Development Program (HPNSDP),pp.1-80, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, April 2011. , (2010e) 2009 Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh,pp.1-333, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, August 2010. , (2010f) Allocation of business among the different ministries and divisions (schedule I of the Rules of Business 1996) (Revised up to June 2010), Cabinet Division. , (2008g) Project Preparation, Processing, Approval and Revision Procedures for Public Sector, pp.1-90, Planning Commission, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People Republic of Bangladesh, 2008. Bangladesh, Government of People’s Republic, Ministry of Agriculture Websitewww.moa. gov.bd a. Organogram (Organizational Chart) b. Citizens Charter c. Selected DPP References 225 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan Bryson, John M. (2011) Strategic Planning for Public and Non-Profit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement, 4th Edition, 576 pages, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, July 2011. , (1999) Strategic Management in Public and Voluntary Services: A Reader, Pergamon, Amsterdam. , AndEinsweiler, R. C. (1988)Strategic Planning: Threats and Opportunities for Planners, American Planning Association, Chicago. Das, Tarun (2010)Relation between Public Finance Reforms and Macroeconomic Reforms, pp.1-35, AfDB Institutional Support Project, Ministry Of Finance and Economic Affairs, Quadrangle, Banjul, the Gambia, April 2010. , (2008a)Program Budgeting, Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), pp.1-51, ADB Capacity Building Project on Governance Reforms, Ministry of Finance,Mongolia, May 2008. , (2008b)Budget Performance Evaluation- Methodology, Systems and Management, pp.1-53, ADB Capacity Building Project on Governance Reforms, MOF, Mongolia, April 2008. , (2008c) Guidelines for Medium Term Budgeting and Program Budgeting for Line Ministries in Mongolia,pp.1-47, ADB Capacity Building Project on Governance Reforms, Ministry of Finance,Mongolia, January2008. , (2007a) Interlinkages between UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), National Development Plans and Poverty Reduction Growth Strategy – Selected Country Experiences from ESCAP, Part-1, pp.1-84, Part-2, pp.1-78, UN-ESCAP, Bangkok, Oct 2007. , (2007b)Preparation of Strategic Business Plans- Framework and Guidelines to Line Ministries, pp.1-74, ADB Capacity Building Project, MOF, Mongolia,Sep 2007. Finance Division (2012a) An Operational Guideto Prepare Medium Term Strategic Business Plans (MTSBP) For Line Ministries/Division, pp.1-42, Strengthening Public Expenditure Management Program, Deepening Medium Term Budgeting Framework and Financial Accountability Project, Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh, April 2012. , (2012b)Bangladesh Economic Review 2011, pp.1-323, Economic Adviser’s Wing, Finance Division, Ministry of Finance, May 2012.www.mof.gov.bd , (2012c) Ministry Budget Framework (MBF), 2011-12 , (2013d) Ministry Budget Framework (MBF), 2012-13 , (2012e) Budget in Brief, 2011-12 , (2013f) Budget in Brief, 2012-13 , (2012g) Demand for grants of the Ministry of Agriculture, 2011-12 226 References , (2013h) Demand for grants of the Ministry of Agriculture, 2012-13 Government of Mongolia(2005) Health Sector Strategic Master Plan 2006-2015 and Medium Term Expenditure Framework, pp.1-62, Ministry of Health, Ulaanbaatar. Government of Rwanda, Ministry of Agriculture and Animal resources (2009) Agriculture Sector Investment Plan 2009-2012,pp.1-37. Government of USA (2005) Performance Management Process: Strategic Planning, Budget and Performance Management cycle, General Services Administration (GSA), Office of the Chief financial Officer, 31 January 2005. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (2007)Power Sector Strategy,pp.1-34, Ministry of Energy and Water, April 15, 2007. Kim, John M. (2007) edited. From Line-item to Program Budgeting- Global Lessons and the Korean Case, pp.1-281, Korea Institute of Public Finance and the World Bank, Seoul, Korea. Mercer, John (2003) CASCADE Performance Budgeting- A Guide to an Effective System of Integrating Budget and Performance Information and for Linking Long-Term Goals for Day-to-Day Activities, USA, May 2003, www.governmentperformance.info Mintzberg,Henry. (1994)The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Re-conceiving Rolesfor Planning, Plans, and Planners, New York: The Free Press. OECD (2001) Managing Public Expenditure- A Reference Book for Transition Countries, pp.1-497, edited by Richard Allen and Daniel Tommasi, OECD, 2001. Poister, Theodore H. and Gregory D. Streib (1999) Strategic Management in the Public Sector: Concepts, Models, and Processes, pp.308-325, Vol.22, No.3, Public Productivity and Management Review, March 1999. Republic of the Gambia (2006) Education SectorStrategic Plan, 2006-2015, pp.1-106, Department of State for Education, Banjul, Sept 2006. Republic of South Africa (2011) Estimates of National Expenditure 2011, pp.1-948, National Treasury, Pretoria, 23 February 2011. , (2010a) Strategic Plan for the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 2010-2011, pp.1-86, Pretoria. , (2010b) Framework for Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans, pp.1-51, National Treasury, Pretoria, August 2010. Republic of Uganda (2010) Agriculture Sector DevelopmentStrategy and Investment Plan, 2010/11 -2014/15, pp.1-149, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Entebbe, March 2010. United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific (2004) Guidelines on StrategicPlanning and Management of Water Resources, PP.1-94, ST/ESCAP/2346,UN-ESCAP, United Nations, New York. 227 Medium Term Strategy and Business Plan USA, Office of Management and Budget (2007) Preparing and submitting aStrategic Plan, Section 210,pp.1-4, OMB Circular No. A–11 (2007), Executive Office of the President,United States of America, Washington D.C. 20503. World Bank (2010) BangladeshPublic Expenditure and Institutional Review- Towards a Better Quality of Public Expenditure(In Two Volumes) Volume I: Main Report, pp.1 189, Volume-II: Sectoral Analysis, pp.1-95, Report No. 47767-BD, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Unit, South Asia region, June 2010. , (1998) Public Expenditure Management Handbook, pp.1-193, June 1998. 228